AbstractObjectiveFish abundance and growth are regulated by a combination of bottom‐up and top‐down forces, but many management techniques depend more heavily on the latter. Here, we evaluated whether intersystem variation in nutrient loading and bottom‐up forces play more dominant roles in the control of abundance and growth of species across similar lakes than intra‐ and interspecific compensatory effects. We aimed to assess whether patterns of abundance and growth are consistent among fish species across lakes.MethodsWe tested this by evaluating pairwise comparisons of catch‐per‐unit‐effort, condition, and length‐at‐age data for 11 common warmwater fish species from 184 mesotrophic and eutrophic glacial lakes in Indiana, United States. We characterized the environmental conditions of each lake using limnological measurements (e.g., chlorophyll‐a concentration and surface temperature), lake morphology descriptions (e.g., depth and size), catchment characteristics (e.g., percent agricultural land cover), and nutrient load modeling using the Long‐Term Hydrologic Impact Analysis model. Taking a meta‐analysis approach, we used effect size calculation from pairwise correlations among lakes to identify environmental and community impacts on species abundance, condition, and length at age.ResultWe demonstrated that there were positive associations among most species comparisons (i.e., multiple species experiencing relatively fast growth in the same lake). Evaluations of environmental conditions among systems suggested that differences in estimated phosphorus input and the limnological measurements of total phosphorus, Secchi depth, and chlorophyll‐a concentration were good predictors of length at age and catch per unit effort for fish.ConclusionOur results indicated that there is a strong and consistent influence of environmental conditions and bottom‐up processes in determining species abundance and growth. This suggests that bottom‐up forces and environmental conditions linked to nutrient loading likely determine the upper boundary of fish abundance and growth in these lakes.