Limited Testicular Microlithiasis Research Articles

Clinical and seminal parameters associated with testicular microlithiasis and its severity in males from infertile couples.

Is there an association of testicular microlithiasis (TM) and its severity with testicular dysfunction in men from infertile couples? The presence of ≥5 testis microcalcifications per sonogram at the scrotal ultrasonography (US) of infertile males was associated with a more severe testicular dysfunction as compared to males with limited, or without, TM. TM, representing an incidental finding in the scrotal US, is associated with male infertility and a higher risk for testicular cancer as compared to that in infertile males without TM. Still, there are unresolved questions on the relation between TM severity and testicular dysfunction in infertile men, as well as on the identification of risk factors for TM. This study was an observational, retrospective, case-control investigation involving males who underwent clinical evaluation, measurement of reproductive hormones, seminal analysis and scrotal US as part of diagnostic work-up for couple infertility at an andrology clinic, between January 2004 and December 2018. One hundred patients, out of the 2112 scored men, were found to have TM during the US evaluation. One hundred male partners from 100 infertile couples without TM, comprising the control group, were selected through a matched analysis by age and date of evaluation to reduce the confounding effect of both age and technique variability all along the long period of observation. TM was defined as limited TM (LTM) or classical TM (CTM), when the maximum number of hyperecogenic spots per sonogram was <5 or ≥5, respectively. CTM, LTM and control groups were compared for clinical variables, serum levels of FSH, LH, and total testosterone, as well for semen parameters and scrotal US features. After the exclusion of cases with testicular nodules to eliminate the possible confounding effect of testis cancer on testicular dysfunction, cases with CTM showed a lower mean testis volume (P = 0.03) and a lower sperm concentration (P = 0.03) as compared to the other two groups. A higher FSH level was observed in the CTM group compared to the LTM group (P = 0.02) and in controls (P = 0.009). The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only a smaller testicle volume exhibited an independent significant association with a higher odds of detecting CTM (odds ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.94; P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between groups in the prevalence of risk factors for testicular cancer, or in the prevalence of conditions associated with TM. The retrospective design of the study did not allow conclusions to be drawn about the possible underlying links in the associations of TM with defective spermatogenesis. Males from infertile couples who exhibit a reduced testicular volume should undergo scrotal US, independent of sperm parameters, to exclude CTM and, eventually, testis cancer, although the association of CTM and current or future testis cancer risk is not yet clear. Evidence is provided here demonstrating that the presence of LTM has no clinical relevance in males from infertile couples. Investigation was funded by Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, PRIN 2018, Italy. The authors have not declared any competing interests. N/A.

Prevalence and Chronological Changes of Testicular Microlithiasis in Isolated Congenital Undescended Testes Operated On at Less Than 3 Years of Age

To clarify the prevalence and chronological changes of testicular microlithiasis in isolated congenital undescended testes, retrospective chart review was performed. Among children with palpable isolated undescended testes who underwent orchiopexy at less than 3 years of age between January 2009 and May 2016, those who had preoperative testicular ultrasonography were enrolled. Testicular microlithiasis was classified as limited or classic. Sixty-five patients (54 unilateral undescended testes and 11 bilateral undescended testes) were enrolled. Preoperative evaluation demonstrated limited testicular microlithiasis in only 2 undescended testes in 2 patients (1 with unilateral undescended testes and 1 with bilateral undescended testes). Of these patients, 1 with unilateral undescended testes had limited testicular microlithiasis and the other with bilateral undescended testes had classic testicular microlithiasis after surgery. Among 53 unilateral undescended testes without microlithiasis preoperatively, limited and classic testicular microlithiasis was found in 1 and 6 testes, respectively, during follow-up. Testicular microlithiasis was identified in 2 on the contralateral descended testis of unilateral undescended testes postoperatively. Among 10 patients with bilateral undescended testes without microlithiasis preoperatively, limited testicular microlithiasis was detected in 4 during follow-up. Testicular microlithiasis was not diminished or resolved during follow-up. The overall prevalence of testicular microlithiasis in undescended testes (21.1%) was significantly higher than that in the contralateral descended testis in patients with unilateral undescended testes (3.7%) (P < .01). Most testicular microlithiasis was identified postoperatively and never improved. The prevalence of testicular microlithiasis in isolated congenital undescended testes increased with time even if operated on early in life.

The Association Between Testicular Microlithiasis and Semen Parameters in Chinese Adult Men With Fertility Intention: Experience of 226 Cases

To investigate the association between testicular microlithiasis (TM) and semen parameters in Chinese adult men with fertility intention. We retrospectively reviewed the ultrasonography results of the reproductive system of 16,204 consecutive adult male patients in our hospital with fertility intention from November 2012 to October 2013. TM was diagnosed by scrotal ultrasonography. Patients with TM were divided into classic testicular microlithiasis (CTM) or limited testicular microlithiasis (LTM). The clinical data of CTM, LTM, and non-TM groups, especially of patients in whom sperms were found in semen analysis, were collected and analyzed. There were 226 men (1.39%) diagnosed with TM. The mean age was 28.96 ± 5.12 years (range, 21-46 years), whereas mean testicular volume was 15.38 ± 4.90 mL (range, 1.62-31.23 mL). CTM and LTM were detected in 141 (62.39%) and 85 patients (37.61%), respectively. Among 200 patients who underwent semen analysis, sperms were found in 159 men (79.5%; 97 men with CTM and 62 men with LTM). One hundred and twenty cases without TM (ie, non-TM group) were collected in the control group. Sperm concentration, total motility, and percentage of progressively motile of CTM, LTM, and non-TM groups was (38.01 ± 31.58 million/mL vs 52.31 ± 33.26 million/mL vs 67.16 ± 36.94 million/mL; P <.001), (46.03 ± 23.69% vs 55.37 ± 24.16% vs 62.08 ± 20.45%; P <.001), and (35.88 ± 20.17% vs 43.15 ± 21.08% vs 47.10 ± 17.84%; P <.001), respectively. TM is associated with worse semen parameters in adult men with fertility intention. The extent of microlithiasis correlates inversely with semen parameters.

Testicular Microlithiasis in Boys and Young Men With Congenital or Acquired Undescended (Ascending) Testis

We assessed the prevalence of testicular microlithiasis by ultrasound in boys and young men with congenital or acquired undescended (ascending) testis. During followup for testicular growth patients with congenital or acquired undescended (ascending) testis were also screened by ultrasound for testicular microlithiasis, which was defined as echogenic foci without shadowing within the testis parenchyma. Classic microlithiasis was defined as 5 or more echogenic foci in either or both testes and limited microlithiasis as fewer than 5 foci. We performed 181 ultrasounds in 181 patients (199 congenital undescended testes) with a mean age of 12.6 years (range 2.6 to 28.6) and 636 ultrasounds in 320 patients (350 acquired undescended/ascending testes) with a mean age of 12.4 years (4.1 to 24.1). Age in both patient groups was equivalent. Median followup was 1.34 years (range 0 to 3.2). Testicular microlithiasis was found in 14 patients (2.8%), of whom 11 (2.2%) displayed classic testicular microlithiasis and 3 (0.6%) exhibited limited testicular microlithiasis. Among these 14 patients 5 had congenital undescended testes, which demonstrated classic microlithiasis. Of these 5 patients 4 had chromosomal deformities. The remaining 9 patients had acquired undescended (ascending) testis, which exhibited classic microlithiasis in 6 instances and limited microlithiasis in 3. The prevalence of testicular microlithiasis in patients with undescended testis is 2.8%. There is no difference in the prevalence of testicular microlithiasis between congenital and acquired undescended (ascending) testes.

Prevalence of Testicular Microlithiasis in Asymptomatic Males 0 to 19 Years Old

We assessed the prevalence of testicular microlithiasis via ultrasound in asymptomatic males 0 to 19 years old. We studied only patients with 2 scrotal testes at birth and at examination. We excluded boys with a history of undescended testis, hydrocele, varicocele and syndromes associated with testicular microlithiasis. To assess for testicular microlithiasis, we scanned the scrotum ultrasonographically by recording transverse and longitudinal images of each testis. Classic testicular microlithiasis was defined as 5 or more echogenic foci in either or both testes. Boys with fewer than 5 microliths (but with at least 1) were deemed to have limited testicular microlithiasis. We examined 694 asymptomatic boys between October 2007 and July 2008, of whom 670 participated in the study. Classic testicular microlithiasis was present in 16 boys (2.4%) and limited testicular microlithiasis in 12 (1.8%), yielding a total prevalence of 4.2%. Classic testicular microlithiasis was found in 1 patient younger than 6 years, 8 boys 6 to 12 years old and 7 boys older than 12 years. There was a significant difference in prevalence among the 3 age groups (p = 0.032). Testicular malignancies were not found in any patient. Of the 24 boys excluded from the study testicular microlithiasis was seen in 4. The prevalence of classic testicular microlithiasis in asymptomatic boys is 2.4% and increases with age.

Development of a Primary Testicular Tumour during Surveillance for Testicular Microlithiasis

We describe a case of the development of a testicular tumour in a patient with unilateral limited testicular microlithiasis after five years on a follow-up surveillance program. We discuss the risk factors for the development of a testicular tumour, review the literature, and suggest a management strategy for follow-up of patients with testicular microlithiasis.

Calcificaciones intratesticulares en la edad pediátrica

IntroductionTesticular microlithiasis (TM) represents an uncommon occurrence at paediatrics with a radiological incidence between 0.16 to 0.6% according to reports. The greater use of ultrasound as well as the availability of high-frequency probes has increased the number of incidental TM being diagnosed. Material and MethodFrom january 1998 to october 2002 seven children, aged 9 to 13 years (average 11 years and 1 months), were diagnosed of MT in our department. Sonographic appearance was hyperechogenic multiple small foci of 1-3mm without acoustic shadowing of the testicular parenchyma. AimTo evaluate sonographic patterns of TM, their associations, clinical consequences and to determine their management. ResultsAll children were asymptomatic and the reasons for the ultrasound were: cryptorchism (3), short height (1), gynecomastia (1), varicocele (1) and scrotum trauma (1). It should be noted that 3 of the cases showed bilateral TM. Out of 10 testicles with TM, 8 met classic testicular microlithiasis (CTM) criteria (at least one image that showed five or more microliths in either or both testes) and 2 had limited testicular microlithiasis (LTM) (to have at least one microlith). Clinical and radiological follow-up is being performed annually, ranging from 18 months to 6 years, during which there hasn’t been progression or regression in the number of TM or in their distribution. In none of these cases there has been shown a related testicular cancer. ConclusionsIn other broad reviews it has been shown that there is no evidence to suggest that the TM have to be considered as premalignant lesions by themselves. However, the association among TM and cancer exists. Because of that, and due to the lack of consensus, we recommend annual clinical and radiological (ultrasound) follow-up until puberty, and thereafter the patient should be informed of unknown natural history of this condition. We do not recommend more invasive procedures such as biopsy except: 1) apart form the TM there is a change in the echogenicity or 2) if there is a change in the number or distribution of the TM.

Microlitiasis testiculares en la edad pediátrica

AimTo evaluate the ecographic patterns of testicular microlithiasis (TM) in paediatric age, its associations, clinical implications and how to manage them. Material and methodsMaterial and methods: We study four children between 11 and 13 years old with testicular microlithiasis. The ecographic study is realized with a 7.5 Mhz linear probe. ResultsTwo of the cases present bilateral microlithiasis. In five of the testicles, the presentation fits the pattern of classic testicular micro-lithiasis (CTM) (≥?5 echogenic foci per transducer field) and one testicle presents limited testicular microlithiasis (< 5 echogenic foci per transducer field). Distribution in the case of CTM is diffuse in two testes, peripheral in another two testicles and central in one of them. In one of the bilateral presentations, a biopsy of both testes is performed, observing intratubular calcification in both. None of them has developed a tumor during the follow-up period, which ranges from nine months to four years. ConclusionsTM have a characteristic echographic appearance. In the absence of focal lesions, they must undergo echographic and clinical control. Neither tumor marker assessment nor biopsy is necessary.

Testicular microlithiasis: US follow-up.

To determine in patients with testicular microlithiasis (TM) the short-term natural history of classic TM (CTM) and limited TM (LTM). In 104 patients, testicular microliths were identified on ultrasonographic (US) images; 39 patients had five or more microliths on at least one US image (criterion for CTM), and 65 patients had fewer than five microliths (criterion for LTM). Attempts were made to have all patients return for follow-up US to assess for change in TM or development of tumor. Seven (18%) of the 39 patients with CTM and one (2%) of the 65 patients with LTM had tumor at presentation (P =.004). Among all 104 patients, follow-up US was performed in 72 patients (31 with CTM, 41 with LTM), with mean follow-up of 45 months (range, 12-90 months). None of these patients had interval development of testicular neoplasm. LTM did not progress to CTM in any patient. Progression in number of microliths was seen in two patients with CTM. Patients with LTM have a lower prevalence of associated malignancy than do patients with CTM. The risk of developing malignancy in patients with isolated TM (LTM or CTM) is low at short-term follow-up. These results raise the question of the need for routine US in this patient population.