Background:Systemic Sclerosis (SS) is a heterogenous disease with a broad range of organ involvement. Calcinosis is a common problem and although it may affect almost any body tissue, it is typically seen in the limbs.1Its presence relates with higher risk of digital ulcers and infection.2It is still unknown whether patients with calcinosis also have other clinical features that differentiate them from the remaining.Objectives:To determine the prevalence of calcinosis in a SS cohort and to evaluate if its presence relates with specific clinical features.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted evaluating a cohort of SS patients. Plain radiographs were taken to assess calcinosis at elbows, hands, knees and feet. Clinical data was obtained and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26®.Results:We included 25 patients, 21 females [n= 21 (84%)], median (min, max) age was 58 (27, 75) years-old. Regarding disease classification, 16 (64%) had limited SS, 4 (16%) had diffuse SS, 3 (12%) had overlap syndrome and 2 (8%) had early SS. Ten (40%) patients had radiological calcinosis in at least one site, seven of which (70%) were subclinical. The most affected areas were knees and hands [n=6 (24%)]. Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of patients with and without calcinosis. Limited SS was significantly more prevalent in the calcinosis group [n=9 (90%) vs. n=7 (46.7%), p=0.04]. All patients had Raynaud phenomenon [n=10 (100%) vs. 15 (100%)]. Current or past digital ulcers [n=5 (50%) vs. n=6 (40%), p=0.697], telangiectasias [n=9 (90%) vs. n=11 (73.3%), p=0.615], pulmonary hypertension [n=2 (20%) vs. n=1 (6.7%), p=0.550] and esophageal involvement [n=6 (60%) vs. n=6 (40%), p=0.428] were more frequent in the calcinosis group but with no statistical significance. Although late capillaroscopic pattern was more frequent in the calcinosis group, there was no statistical significance difference [n=4 (40%) vs. n=1 (6.7%), p=0.121]. Seropositivity for centromere-B antibodies was more frequent in the calcinosis group but with no statistical significance [n=7 (70%) vs. n=8 (53.3%), p=0.678].Table 1.Demographic and clinical data of patients with and without calcinosis.Demographic and clinical dataCalcinosis (n=10)No calcinosis (n=15)p-valueFemale gender, n (%)9 (90)12 (80)0.626Age (years), median [min,max]68.5 [27, 75]52 [36, 73]0.129Cutaneous classificationLimited, n (%)9 (90)7 (46.7)0.04Diffuse, n (%)1 (10)3 (20)0.626Early, n (%)0 (0)2 (13.3)0.500Overlap, n (%)0 (0)3 (20)0.250Clinical manifestationsCurrent or previous digital ulcers, n (%)5 (50)6 (40)0.697Interstitial lung disease, n (%)2 (20)4 (26.7)1.000Pulmonary hypertension, n (%)2 (20)1 (6.7)0.550Arthritis, n (%)2 (20)3 (20)1.000Calcinosis, n (%)3 (30)0 (0)0.052Esophageal involvement, n (%)6 (60)6 (40)0.428NFC patternsNon specific abnormalities, n (%)1 (10)3 (20)0.626Early scleroderma, n (%)1 (10)1 (6.7)1.000Active scleroderma, n (%)3 (30)10 (58.8)0.111Late scleroderma, n (%)4 (40)1 (6.7)0.121AutoantibodiesCentromere B, n (%)7 (70)8 (53.3)0.678Scl-70, n (%)1 (10)4 (26.7)0.615Conclusion:The prevalence of calcinosis was similar to that reported in literature (18-49%). This study confirmed the association, already found in previous studies, between calcinosis and the limited form of SS and raises attention for the importance of calcinosis radiographic screening since there was a high prevalence of subclinical calcinosis.1Although there were some clinical differences between patients with and without calcinosis, given the small cohort, statistical significance was not obtained. Larger studies are needed to increase statistical power.
Read full abstract