Limited Dorsiflexion Range Of Motion Research Articles

Effect of varied dorsiflexion range of motion on landing biomechanics in chronic ankle instability.

Limited dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) is a risk factor for lateral ankle sprain. However, varied DFROM exists within the chronic ankle instability (CAI) population, and how the variability may influence altered movement patterns during landing is unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify different movement strategies during maximal jump landing/cutting among CAI patients classified by varied DFROM. One hundred CAI subjects were classified into 3 subgroups based on their DFROM, measured by the weight-bearing lunge test: a Hypo- (≤40°), Normal- (40-50°), and Hyper-DFROM group (≥50°). Participants completed five trials of maximal jump landing/cutting. Lower extremity joint angles and EMG activation of seven muscles were collected from initial contact to toe-off. Functional analyses of variance were used to evaluate between-group differences for these outcome variables. Hypo-DFROM group (14M, 10F) displayed the reduced ankle dorsiflexion and inversion angles with increased hip flexion angle as a compensatory kinematic chain movement strategy. In addition, motion restrictions of the ankle are associated with altered muscle activation in both distal and proximal muscles during landing/cutting. Normal-DFROM (25M, 30F) and Hyper-DFROM (11M, 10F) groups also have different movement strategies including greater inversion angle and less EMG activation, which could contribute to further ankle injuries. Our data suggest that limited DFROM negatively affects the ankle joint during demanding movement within the CAI population. These movement patterns in CAI patients with pathomechanical deficits could contribute to further ankle sprains.

Effects of gastrocnemius stretching with talus-stabilizing taping on ankle dorsiflexion and balance in individuals with limited ankle dorsiflexion: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Various interventions have been recommended to increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM); however, few studies have investigated the long-term effects of applying gastrocnemius stretching with talus-stabilizing taping (GSTST). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of gastrocnemius stretching (GS) and GSTST on DFROM and balance in subjects with limited DFROM. METHODS: Twenty-six subjects with limited DFROM were randomly allocated to either the GS group (n= 13) or GSTST group (n= 13) for 6 weeks. Maximum DFROM before heel-off during gait, passive DFROM, posterior talar glide, flexibility of the gastrocnemius, and the lower-quarter Y-balance test (YBT-LQ) were assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the changes in variables. RESULTS: The GSTST group had greater maximum DFROM before heel-off, passive DFROM, and posterior talar glide than the GS group. Gastrocnemius flexibility and YBT-LQ scores increased significantly post-intervention in both groups; however, there was no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: GSTST is recommend for improving ankle DFROM and balance in subjects with limited DFROM.

Foot kinematics and leg muscle activation patterns are altered in those with limited ankle dorsiflexion range of motion during incline walking

BackgroundLarger ankle dorsiflexion (DF) is required when walking on inclined surfaces. Individuals with limited DF range of motion (ROM) may experience greater tissue stress on sloped surfaces and walk in altered gait patterns compared to the those with normal DF ROM. Research questionWould the individuals with limited DF ROM walk with distinctive ankle DF patterns compared to those with normal DF ROM on the inclined surfaces? MethodsTen Limited DF ROM (passive ROM=35.3 ± 2.7°) and nine Normal DF ROM (passive ROM=46.4 ± 4.2°) participants walked on a treadmill at five slope angles (0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°) for 2 min at a self-selected speed. The peak DF angles and the peak myoelectric activity levels of the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles were quantified during the swing and stance phases of each walking trial, and they were compared between the two groups. ResultsParticipants with limited DF ROM walked with smaller peak DF (3.1° at 0° slope ~ 8.4° at 20° slope) and greater peak TA activity in swing than those of the Normal ROM participants (3.4° ~ 12.2°), with significant differences at 20° slope. The peak DF angle in stance (Limited: 9.6° ~ 19.0°; Normal: 10.1° ~ 21.0°) did not differ between the two groups at all slopes, but the peak activity of the SOL muscle was significantly greater for the Limited group at slopes of 10° and higher. SignificanceStudy results indicate that incline walking could be more challenging to the individuals with limited DF ROM as they need to approach and push-off the sloped surfaces with more efforts of the dorsiflexor and the plantar flexor muscles, respectively. Prolonged walking on inclined surfaces may produce faster development of muscle fatigue or tissue damage than those with normal DF ROM.

Utility of the Overhead Squat and Forward Arm Squat in Screening for Limited Ankle Dorsiflexion.

Rabin, A and Kozol, Z. Utility of the overhead squat and forward arm squat in screening for limited ankle dorsiflexion. J Strength Cond Res 31(5): 1251-1258, 2017-Limited ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM) has been implicated in several lower extremity disorders. Effective screening for DF ROM may, therefore, help to identify "at risk" individuals. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the utility of 2 screening tests in detecting limited ankle DF ROM. Fifty-three healthy participants underwent an overhead squat (OS) test and a forward arm squat (FAS) test, as well as bilateral testing of weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing ankle DF ROM. Participants whose DF ROM fell below 1 SD from the sample average were considered to have limited DF ROM. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratio (LR) of the OS and FAS in detecting individuals with limited DF ROM was calculated. The sensitivity of the OS was 1.00 regardless of the mode or the side of testing, whereas specificity ranged from 0.34 to 0.36. The positive LR of the OS ranged from 1.52 to 1.56, whereas negative LR was 0.00. The sensitivity of the FAS ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, whereas specificity ranged from 0.84 to 0.88. The positive and negative LR of the FAS ranged from 3.49 to 6.02, and 0.34 to 0.53, respectively. Our findings suggest that the OS and FAS may be used as complementing tests in screening for ankle DF limitation. Because of its excellent sensitivity, the OS should be performed first, and if negative, may confidently rule out limited DF ROM. However, given a positive OS, testing should proceed with the FAS, to more confidently rule in limited DF ROM.

Correlations Among Foot Arching, Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion, and Obesity Level in Primary School Children

This study sought to assess the prevalence of flat feet in primary school children and to find correlations among arch height, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), and obesity level. The 400 children aged 10 to 12 years who took part in the study had their body height, weight, and fat percentage measured. Based on these measurements, body mass index was calculated and weight status was categorized for all of the participants. The height of the longitudinal arch of the foot was measured on a computerized podoscope and given in Clarke's angles. Dorsiflexion ROM was assessed with the child in the nonweightbearing sitting position with the knees 90° flexed. The arithmetic mean and standard deviation were implemented to analyze the data. Intergroup differences were assessed by Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and post hoc Tukey tests. Significance was accepted at P = .05. Flat feet were found in 36% of participants; limited ROM was found in both feet in 25% of participants and in one foot in 12%. No significant differences in dorsiflexion ROM in children with high-arched, normal, and flat feet were revealed. Excessive body weight was disclosed in 21% of participants. Overweight and obese children had significantly lower foot arches and notably smaller ankle dorsiflexion ROM than those with normal weight. Ankle dorsiflexion ROM is similar in children with high-arched, normal, and flat feet. However, limited dorsiflexion ROM is more often found in children with excessive weight.

The association between loss of ankle dorsiflexion range of movement, and hip adduction and internal rotation during a step down test

A pattern of excessive hip adduction and internal rotation with medial deviation of the knee has been associated with numerous musculo-skeletal dysfunctions. Research into the role that ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM) play in lower limb kinematics is lacking. The objective of this cross-sectional, observational study was to investigate the relationship between ankle DF ROM, and hip adduction and hip internal rotation during a step-down test with and without heel elevation in a healthy female population. Hip and ankle ROM was measured kinematically using a ten-camera Optitrack motion analysis system. Thirty healthy female participants (mean age = 20.4 years; SD = 0.9 years) first performed a step-down test with the heel of the weight bearing foot flat on the step and then with the heel elevated on a platform. Ankle DF, hip adduction and hip internal rotation were measured kinematically for the supporting leg. Participants who had 17° or less of ankle DF ROM displayed significantly more hip adduction ROM (p = 0.001; Cohen's d effect size = 1.2) than the participants with more than 17° of DF during the step-down test. Participants with limited DF ROM showed a significant reduction in hip adduction ROM during the elevated-heel step-down test (p = 0.008). Hip internal rotation increased in both groups during the EHSD compared to the step-down test (p > 0.05) Reduced ankle DF ROM is associated with increased hip adduction utilised during the step-down test. Ankle DF should be taken into account when assessing patients with aberrant frontal plane lower limb alignment.

Effect of treadmill walking with ankle stretching orthosis on ankle flexibility and gait.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of the ankle in the lunge to estabilish effectiveness of an ankle stretching orthosis (ASO) on the ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) of individuals with limited dorsiflexion ROM. [Subjects and Methods] Forty ankles with decreased dorsiflexion ROM of 20 participants were evaluated in this study. After wearing the ASO, participants walked on a treadmill for 15 minutes. Participants walked on the treadmill at a self-selected comfortable speed. Ankle dorsiflexion ROM, maximum dorsiflexion ROM before heel-off, and time to heel-off during the stance phase of gait were measured before and after 15 minutes of treadmill walking with the ASO. The differences in all variables between before and after treadmill walking with ASO were analyzed using the paired t-test. [Results] Ankle active and passive ROM, and dorsiflexion ROM during lunge increased significantly after treadmill walking with ASO. Treadmill walking with the ASO significantly increased the angle of maximal dorsiflexion before heel-off and time to heel-off during the stance phase. [Conclusion] The results of this study show that treadmill walking with the ASO effectively improved ankle flexibility and restored the normal gait pattern of the ankle joint by increasing dorsiflexion ROM, maximal angle of dorsiflexion, and time to heel-off in the stance phase.

Effects of joint mobilization on chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of joint mobilization, in which movement is applied to the ankle's dorsiflexion range of motion, on dynamic postural control and on the self-reported instability of patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial with repeated measures and a follow-up period. Ninety patients with a history of recurrent ankle sprain, self-reported instability, and a limited dorsiflexion range of motion, were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (Joint Mobilizations, 3 weeks, two sessions per week) the placebo group (Sham Mobilizations, same duration as joint mobilization) or the control group, with a 6 months follow-up. Dorsiflexion Range of Motion (DFROM), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and CAI Tool (CAIT) were outcome measures. A separate 3 × 4 mixed model analysis of variance was performed to examine the effect of treatment conditions and time, and intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of the independent variable. Results: The application of joint mobilization resulted in better scores of DFROM, CAIT, and SEBTs in the intervention group when compared with the placebo or the control groups (p < 0.001). The effect sizes of group-by-time interaction, measured with eta-squared, oscillated between 0.954 for DFROM and 0.288 for SEBT posteromedial distance. In within-group analysis, the manipulation group showed an improvement at 6 months follow-up in CAIT [mean = 5.23, CI 95% (4.63–5.84)], DFROM [mean = 6.77, CI 95% (6.45–7.08)], anterior SEBT [mean = 7.35, CI 95% (6.59–8.12)], posteromedial SEBT [mean = 3.32, CI 95% (0.95–5.69)], and posterolateral SEBT [mean = 2.55, CI 95% (2.20–2.89)]. Conclusion: Joint mobilization techniques applied to subjects suffering from CAI were able to improve ankle DFROM, postural control, and self-reported instability. These results suggest that joint mobilization could be applied to patients with recurrent ankle sprain to help restore their functional stability.Implications for RehabilitationFunctional instability is a very common sequela in patients with CAI, resulting in reduced quality of living due to the limitations it imposes on daily life activities.The mobilization with movement technique presented by Mulligan, and based on the joint mobilization accompanied by active movement, appears as a valuable tool to be employed by physical therapists to restore ankle function after a recurrent ankle sprain history.ROM restriction, subjective feeling of instability and dynamic postural control are benefiting from the joint mobilization application.

Dorsiflexion deficit during jogging with chronic ankle instability

The purpose of the study was to determine whether individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) demonstrate altered dorsiflexion/plantar flexion range of motion (ROM) compared to controls during jogging. The case control study took place in a university motion analysis laboratory. Fourteen volunteers participated in the study, seven suffered from CAI (age 25 ± 4.2 years, height 173 ± 9.4 cm, mass 71 ± 8.1 kg) and seven were healthy, matched controls (age 25 ± 4.5 years, height 168 ± 5.9 cm, mass 67 ± 9.8 kg). All subjects jogged on an instrumented treadmill while a ten-camera motion analysis system collected three-dimensional kinematics of the lower extremities. The main outcome measure was sagittal plane (dorsiflexion/plantar flexion) range of motion of the ankle throughout the gait cycle. CAI subjects had significantly less dorsiflexion compared to the control group from 9% to 25% during jogging (4.83 ± 0.55°). CAI subjects demonstrated limited ankle dorsiflexion ROM during the time of maximal dorsiflexion during jogging. Limited dorsiflexion ROM during gait among individuals with CAI may be a risk factor for recurrent ankle sprains. These deficits should be treated appropriately by rehabilitation clinicians.

Effects of an eight-week stretching program on the passive-elastic properties and function of the calf muscles of older women

Calf muscle stretching programs are used to increase dorsiflexion range of motion at the ankle, yet the effects of the stretching programs on the passive properties of aged calf muscles and on standing and ambulatory function have not been studied. This initial study examined the effects of an eight-week stretching program on the passive-elastic properties of the calf muscles of older women and on selected functional activities. Nineteen women aged 65-89 years with limited dorsiflexion range of motion first completed a timed agility course, a timed 10-m walk and a standing functional reach test. A dynamometer then moved the right ankle from plantarflexion to maximal dorsiflexion and back to plantarflexion at 5 deg s(-1) to measure calf muscle passive properties. The women were randomly assigned to a group that stretched three-times a week for eight-weeks (n=10) or to a control group (n=9) that did not. The tests were repeated after the stretching program. The stretching group showed increased maximal dorsiflexion range of motion, passive resistive forces (Newtons [N]), and the absorbed and retained passive-elastic energy (deg N) (P<0.05). They also had decreased times for the agility course and the 10-m walk (P<0.05). The functional reach test did not change for either group. The eight-week stretching program most likely increased the maximal length, length extensibility and passive resistive forces of the calf muscles. Adaptations of other ankle and leg structures also may have contributed. The passive adaptations were associated with enhanced performances of ambulatory functional activities.

Slow passive stretch and release characteristics of the calf muscles of older women with limited dorsiflexion range of motion

Objective. Examine the slow passive stretch and release characteristics of the calf muscles of older women with limited dorsiflexion range of motion. Design. A cross-sectional comparative design. Background. The passive stretch and release characteristics of the calf muscles of older women with limited dorsiflexion range of motion have not been studied. Methods. Fifteen older women (mean 79 years) with active dorsiflexion ⩽10° and 15 younger women (mean 24 years) without limited dorsiflexion were tested. The right ankle was stretched from plantarflexion to maximal dorsiflexion and released into plantarflexion at 5°/s with minimal surface EMG activity in the soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles. Length, passive-elastic stiffness and stored passive-elastic energy were examined. Results. The older women had less maximal passive dorsiflexion, a greater initial stretch angle, and less angular change than the younger women ( P<0.05). The maximal passive resistive force (Newtons) of the stretch phase, and the stored passive-elastic energy (° N) during both stretch and release phases were also less ( P<0.001). The older women had greater passive-elastic stiffness at 0° and 5° of dorsiflexion ( P<0.001). Conclusions. The older women had decreased calf muscle length, extensibility, maximal passive resistive force, stored passive-elastic energy, but greater angle-specific-stiffness at 0 and 5° of passive dorsiflexion. Relevance Older women with limited dorsiflexion range of motion have decreased calf muscle length, passive resistive forces and stored passive-elastic energy that may impact static and dynamic standing balance activities. Greater passive-elastic stiffness within their ambulatory dorsiflexion range of motion may partially compensate for the deficits.

Effect of Superficial Heat, Deep Heat, and Active Exercise Warm-up on the Extensibility of the Plantar Flexors

Warm-up prior to static stretching enhances muscle extensibility. The relative effectiveness of different modes of warm-up, however, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of superficial heat, deep heat, and active exercise warm-up prior to stretching compared with stretching alone on the extensibility of the plantar-flexor muscles. Ninety-seven subjects (59 women, 38 men) with limited dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 groups. Female subjects had a mean age of 27.6 years (SD=7.68, range=17-50), and male subjects had a mean age of 26.8 years (SD=6.87, range=18-48). The first group (group 1) was a control group and did not perform the stretching protocol. The 4 experimental groups (groups 2-5) performed a stretching protocol 3 days per week for 6 weeks. Group 2 performed the static stretching protocol only; group 3 performed active heel raises before stretching; group 4 received 15 minutes of superficial, moist heat to the plantar-flexor muscles before stretching; and group 5 received continuous ultrasound for 7 minutes before stretching. Dorsiflexion ROM measurements were taken initially and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks. All experimental groups increased active and passive range of motion (AROM and PROM). The mean AROM/PROM differences at 6 weeks were 1.11/1.39 degrees for group 1, 4.10/6.11 degrees for group 2, 4.16/4.21 degrees for group 3, 4.38/4.90 degrees for group 4, and 6.20/7.35 degrees for group 5. The group receiving ultrasound before performing the stretching protocol (group 5) displayed the greatest increase in both AROM (6.20() and PROM (7.35(). Among the modalities tested, the use of ultrasound for 7 minutes prior to stretching may be the most effective for increasing ankle dorsiflexion ROM.