Practice Of Lifestyle Medicine Research Articles

American College of Lifestyle Medicine Expert Consensus Statement: Lifestyle Medicine for Optimal Outcomes in Primary Care.

Identify areas of consensus on integrating lifestyle medicine (LM) into primary care to achieve optimal outcomes. Experts in both LM and primary care followed an a priori protocol for developing consensus statements. Using an iterative, online process, panel members expressed levels of agreement with statements, resulting in classification as consensus, near consensus, or no consensus. The panel identified 124 candidate statements addressing: (1) Integration into Primary Care, (2) Delivery Models, (3) Provider Education, (4) Evidence-base for LM, (5) Vital Signs, (6) Treatment, (7) Resource Referral and Reimbursement, (8) Patient, Family, and Community Involvement; Shared Decision-Making, (9) Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity, and (10) Barriers to LM. After three iterations of an online Delphi survey, statement revisions, and removal of duplicative statements, 65 statements met criteria for consensus, 24 for near consensus, and 35 for no consensus. Consensus was reached on key topics that included LM being recognized as an essential component of primary care in patients of all ages, including LM as a foundational element of health professional education. The practice of LM in primary care can be strengthened by applying these statements to improve quality of care, inform policy, and identify areas for future research.

Lifestyle Medicine Intensivist Competencies: 2023 Expert Consensus Update

Objective: The objective of this expert consensus process was to identify the competencies that lifestyle medicine (LM) Intensivists should be expected to have within their skill set. Methods: Expert panel members with experience in intensive, therapeutic lifestyle change (ITLC) updated and expanded a previously published set of competencies for this intensive LM practice, using an established process for developing consensus statements adapted for the topic. The previously published set of competencies was discussed for possible revision and expansion. Proposed changes were assessed for consensus using a modified Delphi process. Results: The expert panel revised the original list of 34 competencies, maintaining the 6 initial proposed topics that were previously published as Specialist Competencies: (1) Practice-Based Learning and Improvement, (2) Patient Care and Procedural Skills (3) Systems-Based Practice, (4) Medical Knowledge, (5) Interpersonal and Communication Skills, and (6) Professionalism. After a series of meetings and an iterative Delphi process of voting and revision, a final set of 46 competency statements for LM Intensivists achieved consensus. Conclusion: These competencies define the scope of practice and desired skill set for LM Intensivists. Further, these competencies establish a standard for certification of LM Intensivists.

Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners Implementing a Greater Proportion of Lifestyle Medicine Experience Less Burnout.

To identify reasons for burnout, characterize the effect of lifestyle medicine (LM) practice on burnout, and assess the risk of burnout in relation to the proportion of LM practice. Analysis of mixed methods data from a large, cross-sectional survey on LM practice. Web-based survey platform. Members of an LM medical professional society at the time of survey administration. Practitioner members of a medical professional society were recruited to a cross-sectional, online survey. Data were collected on LM practice and experiences with burnout. Free-text data were thematically grouped and counted, and the association of burnout with the proportion of lifestyle-based medical practice was analyzed using logistic regression. Of 482 respondents, 58% reported currently feeling burned out, 28% used to feel burned out but no longer do, and 90% reported LM had positively impacted their professional satisfaction. Among LM practitioners surveyed, practicing more LM was associated with a 43% decrease (0.569; 95% CI: 0.384, 0.845; P = 0.0051) in the odds of experiencing burnout. Top reasons for positive impact included professional satisfaction, sense of accomplishment, and meaningfulness (44%); improved patient outcomes and patient satisfaction (26%); enjoyment of teaching/coaching and engaging in relationships (22%); and helps me personally: quality of life and stress (22%). Implementing LM as a greater proportion of medical practice was associated with lower likelihood of burnout among LM practitioners. Results suggest that increased feelings of accomplishment due to improved patient outcomes and reduced depersonalization contribute to reduced burnout.

Provider-Perceived Value of Interprofessional Team Meetings as a Core Element of a Lifestyle Medicine Program: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of One Center’s Experience

Interprofessional care improves outcomes for medically complex patients and may be a valuable addition to standard lifestyle medicine practice, but implementation barriers exist. The purpose of this study was to explore the key features, perceived impact, and implementation considerations related to holding interprofessional team meetings as part of an intensive lifestyle medicine program. In this mixed-methods study, focus groups were conducted with 15 lifestyle medicine clinicians from various healthcare disciplines who had participated in interprofessional team meetings. Quantitative descriptive statistics of the meeting minutes were also calculated. Clinician-perceived benefits from participating in interprofessional team meetings included increased acquisition of knowledge, access to other clinicians, collaborative decision-making, patient satisfaction, and achievement of patient-centered goals. Participants described the importance of preparing an agenda for the interprofessional team meetings in advance, but a major implementation challenge was the time required to prepare for and conduct the meetings. Commitment and financial support by organization and program leadership were reported as key facilitators to implementing the meetings. Clinicians perceive significant value from incorporation of interprofessional team meetings into an intensive lifestyle medicine program, but successful implementation of meetings requires investment from all levels within a healthcare system.

Incorporating Mental Health Into Lifestyle Medicine.

The evidence-based interconnection between mental health with lifestyle medicine practice is discussed. The extent to which physical health, and mental and behavioral health overlap are significant, and their interaction is seen in many ways. These bidirectional influences form a continuous thread through all lifestyle medicine pillars. The intersection of mental health and lifestyle should be considered and applied to provide optimal evidence-based lifestyle medicine for all patient populations who will benefit from the specific attention to diet, physical activity, relationships, stress, sleep, and substance use. Lifestyle medicine can be utilized to directly address and treat a range of mental health symptoms and disorders, and physical illnesses. In addition, behavior change skills and addressing the psychological factors contributing to barriers are crucial to helping patients reach their lifestyle medicine goals. Approaches to practice that attend to, and address, mental and behavioral health are relevant to and necessary for all types of providers who work within the lifestyle medicine framework.

Nudging as a Support for Behavioral Change in Lifestyle Medicine.

The practice of lifestyle medicine and its emphasis on behavioral change continues to grow around the world. Yet much of the burden of disease weighing on healthcare systems from chronic, modifiable conditions remains stubbornly present. From a behavior change perspective, efforts to date have primarily focused on public health messaging and public health campaigns (global approaches) to interventions such as health coaching (individual approaches). There exists an opportunity to consider contextual elements which support behavioral change. The practice of "nudging" behavior in primary care and allied health settings is proposed as a means of responding to these contextual opportunities. Nudging does not assure change; however, it can invite curiosity about change and small behavioral efforts in the direction of a desired change. Furthermore, its nature conserves autonomy and patient choice while inviting a health-creating behavior. As such, when considered and applied in the context of public health and individual treatment options, it creates a consistent milieu in which behavior change is facilitated.

"Incorporating a Gym Facility in a Lifestyle Medicine Practice for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus".

Incorporating a gym or fitness facility into a lifestyle-focused clinic is potentially one of the most critical facets of the patient-focused care, especially for those with obesity, cardiometabolic disease, and all types of diabetes mellitus. The evidence for prioritizing physical activity and exercise as medicine is well-researched and universally recommended as first-line therapy plus prevention of many chronic disease states. Having a fitness center on-site as part of any clinic could improve patient utilization, reduce barrier to entry, and decrease hesitation to engage in exercise like resistance training. While the conceptualization may seem simple, the pragmatic application and implementation takes proper planning. Developing such a gym will depend upon gym size preference, program development, cost, and available personnel. Thought needs to be put into deciding which type of exercise and ancillary equipment, ranging from aerobic or resistance machines to free weights, will be included and in what format. Fee and payment options should be carefully considered to assure the budget works financially for both the clinic and patient population. Finally, graphic examples of clinical gyms are described to convey the potential reality of such an optimal setting.

Addressing Food Insecurity to Optimize Nutritional Status.

Chronic health conditions related to diet are linked with increased risk for COVID-19 infection, complications, and mortality. Adherence to a healthy diet pattern can be protective, but a major barrier to healthy eating is the high cost of healthy foods. Access to healthy foods is especially limited in households that experience food insecurity, not having enough food or resources to get food. Individuals who live in these households are also at increased risk for a number of health conditions. Addressing food insecurity within lifestyle medicine practice is needed to achieve optimal nutrition status. Emerging food as medicine and other food access programs are promising but coverage of such programs is lacking through healthcare insurers. Medicaid waivers are a potential solution and have been utilized in a handful of states.

Lifestyle Medicine Reimbursement: A Proposal for Policy Priorities Informed by a Cross-Sectional Survey of Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners.

Lifestyle medicine (LM) is a rapidly emerging clinical discipline that focuses on intensive therapeutic lifestyle changes to treat chronic disease, often producing dramatic health benefits. In spite of these well-documented benefits of LM approaches to provide evidence-based care that follows current clinical guidelines, LM practitioners have found reimbursement challenging. The objectives of this paper are to present the results of a cross-sectional survey of LM practitioners regarding lifestyle medicine reimbursement and to propose policy priorities related to the ability of practitioners to implement and achieve reimbursement for these necessary services. Results from a closed, online survey in 2019 were analyzed, with a total of n = 857 included in this analysis. Results were descriptively analyzed. This manuscript articulates policy proposals informed by the survey results. The study sample was 58% female, with median age of 51. A minority of the sample (17%) reported that all their practice was LM, while 56% reported that some of their practice was LM. A total of 55% of practitioners reported not being able to receive reimbursement for LM practice. Of those survey respondents who provided an answer to the question of what would make the practice of LM easier (n = 471), the following suggestions were offered: reimbursement overall (18%), reimbursement for more time spent with patients (17%), more support from leadership (16%), policy measures to incentivize health (13%), education in LM for practitioners (11%), LM-specific billing codes and billing knowledge along with better electronic medical record (EMR) capabilities and streamlined reporting/paperwork (11%), and reimbursement for the extended care team (10%). Proposed policy changes focus on three areas of focus: (1) support for the care process using a LM approach, (2) reimbursement emphasizing outcomes of health, patient experience, and delivering person-centered care, and (3) incentivizing treatment that produces disease remission/reversal. Rectifying reimbursement barriers to lifestyle medicine practice will require a sustained effort from health systems and policy makers. The urgency of this transition towards lifestyle medicine interventions to effectively address the epidemic of chronic diseases in a way that can significantly improve outcomes is being hindered by current reimbursement policies and models.

Social Prescribing and Lifestyle Medicine-A Remedy to Chronic Health Problems?

Social prescribing has been identified as a chance to take a holistic approach to people’s health and wellbeing, especially for people with one or more long-term conditions. Its systemic implementation was a part of the recent United Kingdom National Health Service Long Term Plan. With a lifestyle medicine focus on equipping patients in tools necessary for self-care and self-management of their lifestyle-related health problems that coexists with the need for creating an environment supporting healthy choices, a social prescribing model seems to offer a promising strategy for advancing lifestyle medicine. This idea was discussed during a meeting hosted by the Polish Society of Lifestyle Medicine in collaboration with European Rural and Isolated Practitioners Association, Polish Society of Young Family Doctors (“Młodzi Lekarze Rodzinni”), British Society of Lifestyle Medicine and European Lifestyle Medicine Council in June 2020. The aftermath—this position statement is an Authors’ attempt at summarizing the common ground for social prescribing and lifestyle medicine. It collects experiences of practitioners and researchers from five European countries as well as making recommendations for applying this model in Poland. Despite referring to local conditions, it might provide universal takeaway messages for any healthcare providers interested in combining social prescribing with lifestyle medicine practice.

Digital Lifestyle Medicine: Designing, Delivering, and Scaling for Impact.

Digital Lifestyle Medicine (DLM) is a consumer-centric model of care which elevates the importance of daily behaviors in preventing and reversing chronic disease using virtual and digital modalities to reach patients in the context where lifestyle behaviors occur and empower them to stay well. DLM is health care reimagined, designed to inspire patients to live their best life by enabling skill-building, self-efficacy, and sustainable behavior change supported by peers, scientific-evidence, and a multidisciplinary team of lifestyle medicine (LM) clinicians. Importantly, it requires insights and collaboration from healthcare experts and technology entrepreneurs to provide a profoundly different "user experience" layered with context, relevance, and scalability. Using examples from our DLM practice, we describe how key components of LM practice, including a multidisciplinary care team, behavior change support, health coaching, and peer support, are prime for digital delivery. We conclude by providing preliminary patient outcomes to date, key success factors, and opportunities for enhancement and expansion to inform the adoption and successful implementation of DLM across the collective of LM practice.

Direct Primary Care: A Successful Financial Model for the Clinical Practice of Lifestyle Medicine.

Primary care has been shown to significantly decrease the overall cost of a population's health care while improving the quality of each person's well-being. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is ideally positioned to be delivered via primary care and has been shown to improve short- and long-term health outcomes of patients and populations. Direct primary care (DPC) represents a viable alternative to the fee-for-service reimbursement model. It has been shown to be economically and financially sustainable. Furthermore, it has the potential to fulfill the Quadruple Aim of health care in the United States. LM practiced in a DPC model has the potential to transform health care delivery. This article will discuss the need for health care systems change, provide an overview of the DPC model, demonstrate a basic understanding of the benefits, and review the steps needed to de-risk the investment of time, money, and resources for our future DPC providers.

Lifestyle Medicine Prescriptions.

Lifestyle Medicine prescriptions are a foundational component to the practice of Lifestyle Medicine. With expanding technology, prescriptions are moving from single sheets of paper to customizable ongoing feedback that encourages continuous dialogue and feedback between patient and provider.

Lifestyle Medicine Practice to Diagnose the Relationship between Sleep Patterns and Glucoses of Three Type 2 Diabetes Patients Using GH-Method: Math-Physical Medicine (No. 353)

The author applies his GH-method: math-physical medicine research methodology and lifestyle medicine practice to diagnose the relationship between sleep patterns and glucoses of three type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients in particular the female case referred to as Case A, who has an irregular sleep pattern

Inspiring Medical Students to Choose Primary Care Through Lifestyle Medicine Education.

Despite a growing interest in lifestyle medicine, students at most medical schools in the United States are not receiving enough nutrition education and training in the principles of lifestyle modification to be effective at applying this knowledge to real-world clinical practice. Moreover, the rising prevalence of chronic lifestyle-related diseases and the increasing deficit of primary care providers is overwhelming the US health care system. The need for primary care physicians is being circumvented by medical students' diminishing interest in primary care partly due to concerns about salary, prestige, and being too broad in focus. Students may also recognize that the pharmaceutically based management of chronic conditions and supplemental lifestyle recommendations are often fraught with nonadherence, resulting in the progression of disease states. However, some medical schools have incorporated the concepts and practice of lifestyle medicine into their curriculums. This integration has the potential to inspire medical students to choose a primary care specialty, because students become more adept at addressing and treating the root causes of chronic disease. Lifestyle medicine education can empower students interested in primary care to fulfill their initial desires to treat and heal that may have inspired them to want to become doctors in the first place.

Building a Thriving Lifestyle Medicine Practice Within a Primary Care Clinic: A Model for Aspiring Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners.

The field of Lifestyle Medicine (LM) is growing rapidly as individuals and communities seek real solutions to the hardship of chronic disease. Providers across various medical specialties and allied health professions are gaining certification in this field, and yet are struggling with implementation. Time constraints, concern about reimbursement, and lack of clinical experience in counseling patients are often cited as obstacles. This article will address these issues and demonstrate how LM can be successfully practiced in a standard primary care setting. Active participation in the local community is essential. Office visits must be prepared for efficiently, and encounters should focus on teaching simple concepts to patients. At-home learning activities can then be used to build on these concepts. Referral to health coaches and outside programs are helpful options as well. Equipping providers with practice tools to promote lifestyle change will improve satisfaction for patients and providers alike and is an important step toward advancing the field of LM.

Establishing Competencies for Physicians Who Specialize in the Practice of Lifestyle Medicine

Purpose: This activity by the Expert Lifestyle Medicine Panel (ELMP) proposes a set of competencies for providers who specialize in the practice of lifestyle medicine (LM), focused on intensive therapeutic lifestyle change. Methods: ELMP invited a core consensus group consisting of 13 providers who specialize in LM and key stakeholders to develop, by consensus, a set of competencies for those specializing in the practice of LM based on the LM core competencies for primary care physicians published in 2010. Two ELMP members (JK and MCK) facilitated and moderated the consensus process conducted by email and teleconference. The competencies were emailed to the consensus group for comment and revision and, through an iterative process, full consensus was reached by the 13-member group. Competencies were organized into the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Medical Specialties (ACGME/ABMS) categories. Results: The final set of competencies consist of 34 competencies in the 6 ACGME/ABMS categories. Conclusion: This new set of competencies will provide guidance for the education, certification, and practice of lifestyle medicine by physicians and other health providers who specialize in the practice of intensive lifestyle medicine treatment.

Reforming Women’s Health Care: A Call to Action for Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners to Save Lives of Mothers and Infants

Maternal and infant mortality are fundamental indicators of a society's health and wellness. These measures depict a health crisis in the United States. Compared with other rich countries, women in the United States more frequently die from pregnancy or childbirth, and infants are less likely to survive to their first birthday. Most of these deaths are preventable; disproportionately affect diverse, low-income groups; and are perpetuated by social and health care inequities and subpar preventive care. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is uniquely positioned to ameliorate this growing crisis. The article presents key prescriptions for LM practitioners to build health and health equity for women. These prescriptions, summarized by the acronym PURER, include action in the areas of (1) practice, (2) understanding/empathy, (3) reform, (4) empowerment, and (5) relationship health. The PURER approach focuses on partnering with diverse female patients to promote resilience, promoting social connection and engagement, facilitating optimal family planning and advocating for culturally responsive, equitable health care systems. Through PURER, LM practitioners can help women and partners resiliently overcome the harmful challenges of discrimination and stress characterizing present-day American life. Over time, the equitable and collective practice of LM can help ameliorate the health care barriers undermining the health of women, families, and society.

Characterization of Patients in a Lifestyle Medicine Practice.

Objective. Lifestyle medicine is a relatively new specialty within medicine. The aim of this report is to characterize patients who present to a lifestyle medicine clinical practice. Methods. LifeStyle Medical Centers is an independent, community-based practice; this report is based on over 3200 patients within this practice. Most of the data presented were obtained from an intake questionnaire developed by the practice to provide background and screening particularly relevant to lifestyle medicine, including areas such as stress, sleep, physical activity, health knowledge, motivation, weight loss history and goals, and smoking. Results. Patients who present for lifestyle care come with varied goals, past histories, and current lifestyle issues. Many express a very high level of motivation to lose an unrealistically large amount of weight. The prevalence of physical inactivity, inadequate sleep, high stress, and risk of depression are high, yet the importance of these to health and well-being are often not recognized by the patient. Over 90% of the cost of care was covered by insurance. Conclusions. Having a better understanding of the patients who come to a lifestyle medicine clinic will help practices better design their lifestyle programs and guide lifestyle medicine providers to better engagement and care of their patients.

A New Approach for Lifestyle Medicine Payment.

With more than 85% of health care costs attributable to chronic health conditions, an emphasis on treating the underlying causes of these conditions is imperative. Lifestyle medicine offers treatments that can reverse a wide range of chronic health conditions at minimal cost and without negative side effects. Although one might expect its use to be widespread among health care professionals, it is far from common in everyday practice. A significant contributing factor is the lack of financial incentives for health care providers who practice lifestyle medicine. Current practitioners generally do not receive remuneration consistent with the cost savings resulting from reversing chronic health conditions using lifestyle medicine. The Actuarial Patient Value model offers a new approach to encourage the practice of lifestyle medicine through the use of cash financial incentives based on actual patient health outcomes. This model aligns the incentives of the 3 primary stakeholders in the health care system by offering providers increased compensation, giving patients the opportunity to learn about and achieve optimal health, and reducing costs for health care payers.