Cleavage Of LexA Repressor Research Articles

Crystal structure of RecX: A potent regulatory protein of RecA fromXanthomonas campestris

Crystal structure of RecX: A potent regulatory protein of RecA from<i>Xanthomonas campestris</i>

Biochemical characterization of a mutant RecA protein altered in DNA-binding loop 1.

The double substitution of Glu156 with Leu and Gly157 with Val in the Escherichia coli RecA protein results in a severely reduced level of recombination and constitutive coprotease behavior. Here we present our examination of the biochemical properties of this mutant protein, RecA N99, in an effort to understand its phenotype and the role of loop 1 (L1) in RecA function. We find that RecA N99 protein has reduced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-dependent ATP hydrolysis activity, which is not as sensitive to the presence of SSB protein as wild-type RecA protein. RecA N99 protein is also nearly unable to utilize duplex DNA as a polynucleotide cofactor for ATP hydrolysis, and it shows both a decreased rate of association with ssDNA and a diminished capacity to bind DNA in the secondary binding site. The mutant protein has a corresponding reduction in DNA strand exchange activity, which probably results in the decrease in recombination activity in vivo. The constitutive induction of the SOS response may be a consequence of the impaired ability to repair damaged DNA, resulting in unrepaired ssDNA which can act as a cofactor for the cleavage of LexA repressor. These findings point to an involvement of L1 in both the primary and secondary DNA binding sites of the RecA protein.

Modulation of RecA Nucleoprotein Function by the Mutagenic UmuD′C Protein Complex

The RecA, UmuC, and UmuD' proteins are essential for error-prone, replicative bypass of DNA lesions. Normally, RecA protein mediates homologous pairing of DNA. We show that purified Umu(D')2C blocks this recombination function. Biosensor measurements establish that the mutagenic complex binds to the RecA nucleoprotein filament with a stoichiometry of one Umu(D')2C complex for every two RecA monomers. Furthermore, Umu(D')2C competitively inhibits LexA repressor cleavage but not ATPase activity, implying that Umu(D')2C binds in or proximal to the helical groove of the RecA nucleoprotein filament. This binding reduces joint molecule formation and even more severely impedes DNA heteroduplex formation by RecA protein, ultimately blocking all DNA pairing activity and thereby abridging participation in recombination function. Thus, Umu(D')2C restricts the activities of the RecA nucleoprotein filament and presumably, in this manner, recruits it for mutagenic repair function. This modulation by Umu(D')2C is envisioned as a key event in the transition from a normal mode of genomic maintenance by "error-free" recombinational repair, to one of "error-prone" DNA replication.

Differential cleavage of LexA and UmuD mediated by recA pro67 mutants: implications for common LexA and UmuD binding sites on RecA

In Escherichia coli, RecA-mediated cleavage of LexA repressor is a key regulatory event required for expression of SOS genes involved in the repair of DNA damage. RecA also mediates the cleavage of UmuD protein to UmuD′, a form active in SOS mutagenesis. To determine whether LexA and UmuD have common binding determinants on RecA, we have compared the ability of several recA mutants to function in the cleavage of LexA versus UmuD in vivo. The data reveal that while some recA mutations at Pro67 have a similar effect on LexA and UmuD cleavage, others have striking differential effects. For example, a Pro67 → Trp mutation results in a high level of constitutive cleavage of both proteins. However, Pro67 → Asp and Glu mutations promote constitutive cleavage of LexA and reduce induction of UmuD cleavage to just 5 to 10% of wild-type activity. In contrast, Pro67 → Arg prevents LexA cleavage while allowing nearly 50% of wild-type induction of UmuD cleavage. These results are consistent with the idea that Pro67 is located at a site in the nucleoprotein filament where both LexA and UmuD contact RecA.

Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA Protein with LexA Repressor: I. LexA REPRESSOR CLEAVAGE IS COMPETITIVE WITH BINDING OF A SECONDARY DNA MOLECULE

Essential to the two distinct cellular events of genetic recombination and SOS induction in Escherichia coli, RecA protein promotes the homologous pairing and exchange of DNA strands and the proteolytic cleavage of the LexA repressor, respectively. Since both of these activities require single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and ATP, the inter-relationship between these reactions was investigated and found to display many parallels. The extent of active complex formed between RecA protein and M13 ssDNA, as measured by both ATP hydrolysis and LexA proteolysis, is stimulated in a similar manner by either a reduction in magnesium ion concentration or the presence of single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein. However, unexpectedly, SSB protein inhibits both LexA proteolysis and ATP hydrolysis (in assays containing repressor) at concentrations of RecA protein that are substoichiometric to the ssDNA, arguing that LexA repressor affects the competition between RecA and SSB proteins for limited ssDNA binding sites. Additionally, attenuation of LexA repressor cleavage in the presence of double-stranded DNA or by an excess of ssDNA suggests that interaction of the RecA nucleoprotein filament with either LexA repressor or a secondary DNA molecule is mutually exclusive. The significance of these results is discussed in the context of both the regulation of inducible responses to DNA damage, and the competitive relationship between the processes of SOS induction and genetic recombination.

3.4.21.88 Repressor Lex A

European Journal of BiochemistryVolume 232, Issue 1 p. 1-1 Free Access 3.4.21.88 Repressor Lex A First published: August 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20774.x_2AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Horii, T., Ogawa, T. & Ogawa, H. (1981) Nucleotide sequence of the LexA gene of E. coli. Cell 23, 689– 697. 2 Slilaty, S.N. & Little, J.W. (1987) Lysine-156 and serine-119 are required for LexA repressor cleavage: a possible mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 3987– 3991. 3 Kim, B. & Little, J.W. (1993) LexA and λ CI repressors as enzymes: specific cleavage in an intermolecular reaction. Cell 73, 1165– 1173. 4 Little, J.W., Kim, B., Roland, K.L., Smith, M.H., Lin, L.-L. & Slilaty, S.N. (1994) Cleavage of LexA repressor. Methods Enzymol. 244, 266– 284. Volume232, Issue1August 1995Pages 1-1 ReferencesRelatedInformation

SOS induction in Escherichia coli by single-stranded DNA of mutant filamentous phage: monitoring by cleavage of LexA repressor.

Infection of Escherichia coli in the presence of chloramphenicol with mutant filamentous phage that are defective in the initiation of minus-strand DNA synthesis induces the SOS response as monitored by cellular LexA levels. This observation demonstrates that single-stranded DNA serves as a primary signal for SOS induction in vivo.

20] Cleavage of LexA repressor

Publisher Summary This chapter examines cleavage of LexA repressor. In normally growing cells, about 20 SOS genes are turned off by the LexA repressor. On inducing treatments, LexA undergoes specific proteolytic cleavage; cleavage inactivates LexA and leads to derepression of the SOS genes. This specific cleavage reaction is of biological interest as it controls the state of the SOS regulatory system. Lex A cleavage is catalyzed in vivo and at neutral pH in vitro , by interaction with another regulatory protein, RecA, which is activated in vivo by inducing treatments. The use of mutant proteins with an increased rate of cleavage allows the development of an intermolecular cleavage reaction in which one molecule of LexA acts as an enzyme to attack other molecules. LexA is 22.7 kDa in size and is organized into two structural and functional domains separated by a hinge region. LexA N-terminal region is the DNA binding domain; its C-terminal domain contains the contacts for dimerization, and all the elements necessary for specific cleavage. The cleavage site, Ala 84 -Gly 85 , lies in the hinge region. A tryptic fragment comprising residues 68-202 undergoes both autodigestion and RecA-mediated cleavage at normal rates.

Novel mechanism for UV sensitivity and apparent UV nonmutability of recA432 mutants: persistent LexA cleavage following SOS induction.

The recA432 mutant allele was isolated (T. Kato and Y. Shinoura, Mol. Gen. Genet. 156:121-131, 1977) by virtue of its defect in cellular mutagenesis (Mut-) and its hypersensitivity to damage by UV irradiation (UVs), which were phenotypes expected for a recA mutant. However, we found that in a different genetic background (lexA51 sulA211 uvrB+), recA432 mutants expressed certain mutant phenotypes but not the Mut- and UVs phenotypes (D.G. Ennis, N. Ossanna, and D.W. Mount, J. Bacteriol. 171:2533-2541, 1989). We present several lines of evidence that these differences resulted from the sulA genotype of the cell and that the apparent UVs and Mut- phenotypes of the sulA+ derivatives resulted from lethal filamentation of induced cells because of persistent derepression of sulA. First, transduction of sulA(Def) mutations into the recA432 strains restored cellular mutagenesis and resistance to UV. Second, recA432 sulA+ strains underwent filamentous death following SOS-inducing treatments. Third, cleavage of LexA repressor in a recA432 strain continued at a rapid rate long after UV induction, at a time when cleavage of the repressor in the recA+ parental strain had substantially declined. Fourth, we confirmed that a single mutation (recA432) conferring both the UVs and Mut- phenotypes mapped to the recA gene. These findings indicate that the RecA432 mutant protein is defective in making the transition back to the deactivated state following SOS induction; thus, the SOS-induced state of recA432 mutants is prolonged and can account for an excess of SulA protein, leading to filamentation. These results are discussed in the context of molecular models for RecA activation for LexA and UmuD cleavage and their roles in the control of mutagenesis and cell division in the SOS response.

In vitro analysis of mutant LexA proteins with an increased rate of specific cleavage

Specific cleavage of LexA repressor plays a crucial role in the SOS response of Escherichia coli. In vivo, cleavage requires an activated form of RecA protein. However, previous work has shown that the mechanism of cleavage is unusual, in that the chemistry of cleavage is probably carried out by residues in the repressor, and not those in RecA; RecA appears to facilitate this reaction, acting as a coprotease. We recently described a new type of lexA mutation, a class termed lexA (Ind S) and here called Ind S, that confers an increased rate of in vivo cleavage. Here, we have characterized the in vitro cleavage of these Ind S mutant proteins, and of several double mutant proteins containing an Ind S mutation and one of several mutations, termed Ind −, that decrease the rate of cleavage. We found, first, that the autodigestion reaction for the Ind S mutant proteins had a higher maximum rate and a lower apparent p K a than wild-type LexA. Second, the Ind S mutations had little or no effect on the rate of RecA-mediated cleavage, measured at low protein concentrations, implying that the value of k cat K m was unaffected. Third, the rate of autodigestion for the double-mutant proteins, relative to wild-type, was about that rate predicted from the product of the effects of the two single mutations. Finally, by contrast, these proteins displayed the same rate of RecA-mediated cleavage as did the single Ind − mutant protein. We interpret these data to mean that the Ind S mutations mimic to some extent the effect of RecA on cleavage, perhaps by favoring a conformational change in LexA. We present and analyze a model that embodies these conclusions.

C-terminal truncated Escherichia coli RecA protein RecA5327 has enhanced binding affinities to single- and double-stranded DNAs

RecA5327 is a truncated RecA protein that is lacking 25 amino acid residues from the C-terminal end. The expression of RecA5327 protein in the cell resulted in the constitutive induction of SOS functions without damage to the DNA. Purified RecA5327 protein effectively promoted the LexA repressor cleavage reaction and ATP hydrolysis at a lower concentration of single-stranded DNA than that required for wild-type RecA protein. A DNA binding study showed that RecA5327 has about ten times higher affinity for single-stranded DNA than does the wild-type RecA protein. Moreover RecA5327 protein binds stably to double-stranded (ds) DNA in conditions where the wild-type RecA protein could not bind. The binding of RecA5327 protein to dsDNA was associated with the unwinding of dsDNA, suggesting that RecA5327 binds to dsDNA in the same manner as does the wild-type protein. The fact that RecA5327 does not bind stoichiometrically but forms short filaments on dsDNA suggests that it nucleates to dsDNA much more frequently than does the wild-type protein. The role of the 25 C-terminal residues, in the regulation of RecA binding to DNA, is discussed.

Site-directed mutagenesis of the RecA protein of Escherichia coli. Tyrosine 264 is required for efficient ATP hydrolysis and strand exchange but not for LexA repressor inactivation.

The role of Tyr264 in nucleotide binding and hydrolysis catalyzed by the RecA protein of Escherichia coli was investigated by constructing Gly, Ser, and Phe substitution mutations using oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. The corresponding mutant recA genes neither restored resistance to killing by ultraviolet irradiation nor increased homologous recombination in a recA strain. The purified RecA(Gly264) protein was unable to bind nucleotide, hydrolyze ATP, or form stable ternary complexes with adenosine 5'-O-thiotriphosphate and DNA although the mutant protein bound DNA normally in the absence of nucleotide. The RecA (Phe264) and RecA(Ser264) proteins hydrolyzed ATP poorly and the rates were reduced approximately 8- and 18-fold, respectively. Although capable of low levels of ATP hydrolysis, neither the RecA(Phe264) nor the RecA(Ser264) protein promoted DNA pairing or strand exchange reactions in vitro. Furthermore, these mutant RecA proteins were impaired in their ability to form salt-resistant ternary complexes with adenosine 5'-O-thiotriphosphate) and DNA as judged by filter binding. Nevertheless, nucleoprotein complexes formed with either RecA(Phe264) or RecA(Ser264) protein directed efficient cleavage of LexA repressor in vitro. These results demonstrate that Tyr264 is required for efficient ATP hydrolysis and for homologous pairing of DNA but does not participate in activating RecA protein for LexA repressor autodigestion.

RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity

The DNA damage-inducible SOS response of Escherichia coli includes an error-prone translesion DNA replication activity responsible for SOS mutagenesis. In certain recA mutant strains, in which the SOS response is expressed constitutively, SOS mutagenesis is manifested as a mutator activity. Like UV mutagenesis, SOS mutator activity requires the products of the umuDC operon and depends on RecA protein for at least two essential activities: facilitating cleavage of LexA repressor to derepress SOS genes and processing UmuD protein to produce a fragment (UmuD') that is active in mutagenesis. To determine whether RecA has an additional role in SOS mutator activity, spontaneous mutability (tryptophan dependence to independence) was measured in a family of nine lexA-defective strains, each having a different recA allele, transformed or not with a plasmid that overproduces either UmuD' alone or both UmuD' and UmuC. The magnitude of SOS mutator activity in these strains, which require neither of the two known roles of RecA protein, was strongly dependent on the particular recA allele that was present. We conclude that UmuD'C does not determine the mutation rate independently of RecA and that RecA has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.

Investigation of RecA--polynucleotide interactions from the measurement of LexA repressor cleavage kinetics. Presence of different types of complex.

The proteolysis of the LexA repressor in the presence of RecA and various polynucleotides was studied by measuring the fluorescence decrease of LexA upon cleavage. The results were compared with the DNA binding of RecA to investigate the presence of multiple DNA-RecA complexes. All single-stranded polydeoxyribonucleotides (DNA) efficiently stimulated the proteolysis and the maximum activation was reached in the presence of three or four nucleotides of polynucleotide per monomer of RecA. The stimulative effect was decreased in the presence of larger amounts of poly(dA), poly(dT) or heat-denatured DNA, whereas the excess of single-stranded DNAs chemically modified with chloroacetaldehyde did not present such an inhibitory effect, despite the fact that a second DNA molecule is likely to interact with RecA as monitored by the intrinsic fluorescence of these DNA species. The complicated cleavage promotion and inhibition pattern is tentatively explained by a three-state model assuming that RecA may interact with three single-stranded DNA molecules. According to this model, occupation of the first site would be necessary and sufficient for cleavage promotion, the second site would be neutral with respect to cleavage and the occupation of the third site would inhibit LexA cleavage at least partially. Double-stranded natural DNA did not stimulate cleavage, even under conditions where RecA binds quantitatively to the DNA. No polyribonucleotides (RNA) examined showed a significant stimulative effect either, nor did they appear to interact with RecA.

Non-mutability by ultraviolet light in uvrD recB derivatives of Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA is due to inhibition of RecA protein activation

The deficiency in UV mutagenesis in uvrD3 recB21 strains of E. coli is almost completely overcome by constitutive activation of RecA protein and expression of the SOS system (by recA730 or 43°C treated recA441 lexA71). When SOS was expressed but RecA protein not self-activated ( recA441 lexA71 at 30°C), uvrD3 recB21 still reduced UV mutagenesis at low doses. The uvrD3 recB21) combination is therefore inhibiting activation of RecA protein. It is suggested that the DNA unwinding activity of the products of the uvrD and recB genes may be involved in generating single-stranded DNA needed to activate RecA protein both for the cleavage of LexA repressor and for a futher role in UV mutagenesis.

RecA protein-promoted cleavage of LexA repressor in the presence of ADP and structural analogues of inorganic phosphate, the fluoride complexes of aluminum and beryllium

Complexes formed from A13+ or Be2+ and fluoride inhibit the single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity of RecA protein. In contrast, poly(dT)-RecA-ADP complexes, which are inactive for cleavage of LexA protein, become fully active in the presence of AlF4- or BeF3- ions. These data suggest that fluoride complexes of aluminum and beryllium (called herein X) convert RecA-ADP complexes, which bind weakly to single-stranded DNA, into RecA-ADP-X complexes, which bind tightly to single-stranded DNA, the ADP-X moiety behaving as a nonhydrolyzable analogue of ATP. We propose that AlF4- and BeF3- ions act as analogues of inorganic phosphate by binding to the site of the gamma-phosphate of ATP on RecA-ADP complexes, hence mimicking the single-stranded DNA-RecA-ADP-Pi transition state. We conclude that the elementary reaction that switches RecA protein from a high affinity single-stranded DNA binding state to a low affinity single-stranded DNA binding state is not ATP hydrolysis per se but Pi release.

Activation of protease-constitutive recA proteins of Escherichia coli by all of the common nucleoside triphosphates

To understand why the RecA proteins of the protease-constitutive recA1202 and recA1211 mutants show very high protease activities in vivo without the usual need for DNA damage (E. S. Tessman and P. Peterson, J. Bacteriol. 163:677-687, 1985), we examined the activation of the mutant proteins by nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) in vitro. In vivo, the mutant protease activities are resistant to inhibition by cytidine plus guanosine (C + G) in the growth medium, in contrast to the activities of weaker mutants, such as recA441, which are sensitive to C + G inhibition. We found that RecA1202 and RecA1211 proteins, in contrast to RecA+, can use natural NTPs other than ATP and dATP as cofactors in the cleavage of LexA repressor. The effectiveness of NTPs in promoting LexA cleavage by RecA1202 and RecA1211 proteins decreased in roughly the following order: dATP greater than ATP greater than UTP greater than ATP-gamma S greater than dCTP greater than CTP greater than dGTP greater than GTP greater than TTP. These mutant proteins showed higher affinities for ATP and single-stranded DNA and higher repressor cleavage activities than RecA+ protein. With the various effectors (single-stranded DNA or NTPs), the RecA1202 protein always showed more activity than RecA1211 in the cleavage of LexA repressor in vitro, which is consistent with the greater activity of the recA1202 mutant in vivo. The results explain, in part, why some recA mutants have unusually high constitutive RecA protease activity and why that activity is more or less resistant to C + G inhibition.

Lysine-156 and serine-119 are required for LexA repressor cleavage: a possible mechanism.

LexA repressor of Escherichia coli is inactivated in vivo by a specific cleavage reaction requiring activated RecA protein. In vitro, cleavage requires activated RecA at neutral pH and proceeds spontaneously at alkaline pH. These two cleavage reactions have similar specificities, suggesting that RecA acts indirectly to stimulate self-cleavage, rather than directly as a protease. We have studied the chemical mechanism of cleavage by using site-directed mutagenesis to change selected amino acid residues in LexA, chosen on the basis of kinetic data, homology to other cleavable repressors, and potential similarity of the mechanism to that of proteases. Serine-119 and lysine-156 were changed to alanine, a residue with an unreactive side chain, resulting in two mutant proteins that had normal repressor function and apparently normal structure, but were completely deficient in both types of cleavage reaction. Serine-119 was also changed to cysteine, another residue with a nucleophilic side chain, resulting in a protein that was cleaved at a significant rate. These and other observations suggest that hydrolysis of the scissile peptide bond proceeds by a mechanism similar to that of serine proteases, with serine-119 being a nucleophile and lysine-156 being an activator. Possible roles for RecA are discussed.

5-Azacytidine: survival and induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli K-12

Survival and induction of the SOS system by 5-azacytidine, an analog of cytidine, were studied in Escherichia coli K-12. This compound did not produce any effect on the viability of dcm and dam dcm mutants. Furthermore, recA430 and lexA1 strains (both mutations interfere with LexA repressor cleavage but not recombination proficiency) were more resistant than the wild-type strain of E. coli K-12. In contrast, recBC and recA13 mutants were more sensitive to 5-azacytidine than the wild type. Transient exposure of E. coli to 5-azacytidine for 60 min induced both recA-dependent inhibition of cell division and induction of λ prophage in Dcm + strains but not in Dcm − mutants. Expression of both functions was dependent on recBC exonuclease. On the other hand, 5-azacytidine was unable to trigger the induction of umuCD and mucB genes and no amplification of RecA protein synthesis in either Dcm + or Dcm − strains was observed. These last results are in agreement with previously reported data suggesting that there is a discrimination in the expression of the several SOS functions and that some SOS genes may be induced without amplification of RecA protein synthesis.

Base pair substitution and frameshift mutagenesis induced by apurinic sites and two fluorene derivatives in a recA441 lexA (Def) strain.

One of the consequences of the induction of the Escherichia coli SOS system is the increased ability of the cells to perform mutagenesis. Induction of the SOS system is the result of derepression of a set of genes through a regulatory mechanism controlled by LexA and RecA. In response to an inducing signal, RecA is activated in a form that facilitates the proteolytic cleavage of LexA repressor. Previous works have shown that activated RecA plays a second role, i.e. it is required for the establishment of base pair substitution mutations promoted by UV irradiation. Using a forward mutational assay and recA441 lexA (Def) host bacteria, we show that the result can be extended not only to other mutagens promoting base pair substitution mutations (Apurinic sites, Ap sites and N-hydroxy-N-2-aminofluorene, N-OH-AF) but also mutagens promoting frameshift mutations (N-Acetoxy-N-2-acetylaminofluorene, N-AcO-AAF). In the recA441 lexA (Def) strain all the genes which are part of the lexA regulon, including recA itself, are expressed constitutively. The recA441 mutation allows RecA to acquire its activated form when the bacteria are grown at 42 degrees C. We show that in such strains Ap sites or N-OH-AF induce a high level of mutations only when the bacteria are grown at 42 degrees C. On the other hand, we show that N-AcO-AAF can promote mutations even at 30 degrees C; the number of mutations being increased when the bacteria were grown at 42 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)