Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System Users Research Articles

Extended Use of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) 52 mg: A Population Pharmacokinetic Approach to Estimate In Vivo Levonorgestrel Release Rates and Systemic Exposure Including Comparison With Two Other LNG-IUSs

ABSTRACT With over 30 years of use, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) have proven to be highly effective methods of contraceptives. The active ingredient in LNG-IUS, levonorgestrel (LNG), is released directly into the uterine cavity, which causes suppression of endometrial maturation and thickened cervical mucus. A variety of LNG-IUS options exhibit well-established safety profiles and efficacy, providing anywhere between 2 and 18 times lower systemic exposure when compared with LNG-containing pills or implants. Patient-centered decision-making regarding product choice may be encouraged through standardized comparisons of LNG release and exposure during the time of their respective usage periods. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and PK of extended Mirena use from beyond 5 years to the conclusion of 8 years was designed in the Mirena Extension Trial (MET), thereby facilitating comparisons with LNG-IUS 19.5 mg and LNG-IUS 13.5 mg. Using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods and SHBG concentrations, the authors determined concentrations of plasma LNG levels. Dichloromethane was used for extracting residual LNG from the elastomer material from removed IUS devices, which was then quantified via liquid chromatography and external calibration on a reversed-phase column. Although previous models used measured LNG and SHBG (serum) concentrations, the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) allows for a uniform method of comparison among different pharmacologic studies. The popPK approach allows for a reliable estimates of in vivo LNG exposure and release during the entirety of the 8-year use period. The MET enrolled premenopausal women aged 18–35 years for a multicenter, single-arm study regarding patients who had used LNG-IUS 52 mg for the last 4.5–5 years for up to 8 years. The study took place from December 22, 2016 to May 28, 2021 throughout 54 US centers, with the primary outcome of contraceptive efficacy and failure rate. Participants each provided written, informed consent. Study strengths of the popPK approach included its robust methodology, its ability to provide in vivo release rate estimates, a stepwise demo of model suitability from use years 6 to 8, model-based estimation of unbound LNG, and the ability to provide estimates for both population and individual PK profiles from sparse available sampling. Limitations include the possibility of findings being group effects possibly inapplicable to all LNG-IUS users. In addition, the data fail to provide local endometrial and cervical LNG concentrations due to the systemic nature of the LNG exposure. Finally, the popPK Mondale should not be used for theoretical question addressing (such as creating rate release estimates outside of available data sets). In conclusion, a broad data set indicates that reliable LNG exposure is delivered by 8-year popPK and release models for up to 7 years of LNG-IUs 52 mg use. Efficacy is data-supported for 6–8 years of use, with constant LNG release throughout this time frame. Systemic LNG exposure from LNG-IUD 52 mg proved both comparable to other LNG-IUS devices and significantly lower than oral and implanted LNG-containing contraceptives.

Female sexual function in women using LARC methods

Objective This study aims to assess sexual function (SF) and quality of life (QoL) among women using copper intrauterine devices (Cu-IUD), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or etonogestrel(ENG)-releasing subdermal implant. Methods This is a cross-sectional study involving 213 women who are sexually active, using Cu-IUD, LNG-IUS or ENG implant for at least one year. SF assessment was carried out through the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and QoL was made through The Short Form Health Research. Results Frequency of sexual dysfunction score in Cu-IUD users was 33.8%; 47.2% in LNG-IUS users and 47.8% in ENG-implant users, without difference between groups. Desire domain had higher score in Cu-IUD users (Cu-IUD:4.20 ± 1.15 × LNG-IUS:3.76 ± 1.17 × ENG-implant:3.63 ± 1.15; p = .009). Between Cu-IUD and LNG-IUS users there was no difference in FSFI score. Total FSFI score was higher in Cu-IUD group when compared only to ENG-implant (Cu-IUD:27.48 ± 6.14 × Implant:25.07 ± 6.89; p = .029). Regarding the QoL score, difference was found only in general health domain (Cu-IUD:65.22 ± 14.91 × LNG-IUS:62.61 ± 19.04 × Implant:58.33 ± 16.46; p = .034), with lower score for implant group. Conclusion There was no difference in the SF total score between the users of Cu-IUD, LNG-IUS and ENG implant. However, the score of the FSFI desire domain and general health status were higher among users of the Cu-IUD.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia

Research questionHow does use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia affect endometrial hyperplasia regression and pregnancy rates compared with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)? DesignThis prospective cohort study included 215 infertile women with an indication for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed by hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy. At the time of first- and second-line treatment, patients were offered therapy with either oral MPA 10 mg daily or LNG-IUS. Follow-up biopsies were scheduled after 90 days’ treatment. After endometrial hyperplasia regression, patients were admitted to IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. ResultsBaseline characteristics and confounders including age at diagnosis, body mass index and duration of infertility did not differ between LNG-IUS users and control participants and were accounted for using propensity score weighting. Endometrial hyperplasia regression rate at first follow-up was higher in the LNG-IUS group than the oral progestins group (28/28, 100% and 110/187, 58.8%; P < 0.001), while that after second-line treatment was comparable between the two groups (89/91, 97.8% and 122/124, 98.4%; P = 0.22). Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and cumulative live birth rate following ART in patients ever receiving LNG-IUS were similar to those of patients receiving only MPA (34% versus 39.5%, 22.6% versus 34.7% and 26.4% versus 25.8%). ConclusionEndometrial hyperplasia regression is greater in women receiving LNG-IUS compared with oral MPA, while live birth rates following ART are comparable between the two groups. The use of LNG-IUS does not jeopardize the chances of pregnancy in women seeking fertility treatment.

Continuation Rates of the 52-mg Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System according to the Primary Reason for its Use.

To evaluate whether continuation rates with the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) up to 5 years after placement differed between women using the method exclusively for contraception and those using the device for medical reasons alone. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a family planning clinic with 5,034 LNG-IUS users: 4,287 using the method exclusively for contraception and 747 for medical reasons alone. The continuation rate at 1 to 5 years of use was calculated by life table analysis. Initially, the continuation rate was significantly higher in the contraception group: 85.8 versus 83.4 and 77.4 versus 76.0 per 100 women-years in the 1st and 2nd years of use, respectively. There were more discontinuations due to bleeding/spotting in the medical reasons group in the first two years. The discontinuation rate according to reason for use was not significantly different from the third to the fifth year of use. No women discontinued due to amenorrhea in either group. The continuation rate was significantly higher in the contraception group in the first two years of use. Amenorrhea was not a reason for discontinuation in either group, suggesting that counselling in this respect was adequate. Nevertheless, counselling could perhaps have been better with regards to the expected long period of bleeding and spotting in the first two years after placement.

Hysteroscopic management of endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Introduction This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of hysteroscopy in the management of symptoms related to endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Material and methods Twenty-three LNG-IUS users presenting with endometrial polyps and/or submucous leiomyomas and irregular uterine bleeding were recruited for hysteroscopic examination and surgery. Intrauterine pathology was investigated and treated by hysteroscopic resection with the LNG-IUS in situ, and the effect of the procedure on symptoms was evaluated after three to six months. Results Intrauterine pathology was successfully resected by hysteroscopy in 23 (100.0%) out of 23 cases. Following hysteroscopy, 18 (78.3%) women reported amenorrhea, one (4.3%) regular spotting, three (13.0%) irregular spotting and one (4.3%) patient resumed normal menstrual cycle. We conclude that 19 (82.6%) patients were postoperatively asymptomatic. All procedures were uncomplicated and 4 (17.4%) were carried out without general anesthesia as office procedures. Conclusion Endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas can develop in LNG-IUS users, and this can cause irregular uterine bleeding. Hysteroscopic resection of these pathologies is a feasible method in the clinical management of symptoms.

Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.

Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Epidemiological studies have shown that some hormonal contraceptive methods are associated with increased breast cancer risk, especially if used over long periods. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the risk of breast cancer development in women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). We performed a thorough review of peer-reviewed publications from 10 January 1999, through 31 July 2019, using combinations of search terms for breast cancer risk and LNG-IUS in the Medline, EMBASE, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), and Scielo databases. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017059076). Studies reporting breast cancer risk estimates among healthy users of LNG-IUS were included according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) criteria. Two authors performed data extraction, and a third author resolved disagreements. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Downs and Black instrument. A funnel plot was generated, and a linear regression test of funnel plot asymmetry was used to assess publication bias. Finally, we performed a random-effects model (owing to high study heterogeneity) meta-analysis of seven suitable studies, stratified by the age distribution of patients (<50years, ≥50years, and mixed). We identified 96 studies and manually cross-referenced and excluded duplicate articles. Seventy articles were excluded on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in the assessment of 26 full-text articles. Eight articles were considered adequate for inclusion in this systematic review, and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three publications were case-control studies and five were cohort studies. According to the Downs and Black instrument, 5 studies were rated as "good" and 3 studies were deemed "fair". Our meta-analysis results indicated increased breast cancer risk in LNG-IUS users: for all women, odds ratio (OR)=1.16 (95% CI 1.06-1.28, I2 =78%, P<.01); for women aged <50years, OR=1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.22, I2 =66%, P=.02); and for women aged ≥50years, OR=1.52 (95% CI 1.34-1.72, I2 =0%, P=.84). Current evidence suggests that LNG-IUS users have an increased breast cancer risk regardless of age and indication. The effect of LNG-IUS on breast cancer risk seems to be larger in older users. However, our systematic review detected methodological issues across the available studies, and confounding factors may be responsible for at least a fraction of the risk effects associated with LNG-IUS use. Nevertheless, users of LNG-IUS should be aware of these trends. We believe that caution is needed, and risks should be balanced against proven health benefits (eg effective treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding and avoidance of surgical interventions), when prescribing LNG-IUS for long periods of use, especially in women with other known breast cancer risk factors such as old age, obesity, and familial predisposition.

Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.

To evaluate the relative risk of cervical neoplasms among copper intrauterine device (Cu IUD) and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) users. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 10,674 patients who received IUDs at Columbia University Medical Center. Our data were transformed to a common data model and are part of the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics network. The cohort patients and outcomes were identified by a combination of procedure codes, condition codes, and medication exposures in billing and claims data. We adjusted for confounding with propensity score stratification and propensity score 1:1 matching. Before propensity score adjustment, the Cu IUD cohort included 8,274 patients and the LNG-IUS cohort included 2,400 patients. The median age for both cohorts was 29 years at IUD placement. More than 95% of the LNG-IUS cohort used a device with 52 mg LNG. Before propensity score adjustment, we identified 114 cervical neoplasm outcomes. Seventy-seven (0.9%) cervical neoplasms were in the Cu IUD cohort and 37 (1.5%) were in the LNG-IUS cohort. The propensity score matching analysis identified 7,114 Cu IUD and 2,174 LNG-IUS users, with covariate balance achieved over 16,827 covariates. The diagnosis of high-grade cervical neoplasia was 0.7% in the Cu IUD cohort and 1.8% in the LNG-IUS cohort (2.4 [95% CI 1.5-4.0] cases/1,000 person-years and 5.2 [95% CI 3.7-7.1] cases/1,000 person-years, respectively). The relative risk of high-grade cervical neoplasms among Cu IUD users was 0.38 (95% CI 0.16-0.78, P<.02) compared with LNG-IUS users. By inspection, the Kaplan-Meier curves for each cohort diverged over time. Copper IUD users have a lower risk of high-grade cervical neoplasms compared with LNG-IUS users. The relative risk of cervical neoplasms of LNG-IUS users compared with the general population is unknown.

Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess whether the ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were lower among women using the progestin-only pill (POP) or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and similar to the decrease observed in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill users.Methods: This retrospective study comprised 565 hormonal contraceptive users (COC, POP, LNG-IUS or contraceptive vaginal ring) and 983 non-hormonal contraceptive users, who were seen in two Danish fertility assessment and counselling clinics between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted multiple regression analysis was used to examine the differences in AMH and AFC between hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive users.Results: Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AMH was 31.1% lower among COC users [95% confidence interval (CI) −39.6%, −25.9%; p < 0.001], 35.6% lower among POP users (95% CI −49.0%, −18.6%; p < 0.001) and 17.1% lower among LNG-IUS users (95% CI −31.4%, 0.002%; p = 0.052); no significant differences were seen among vaginal ring users. Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AFC was 31.3% lower among COC users (95% CI −35.0%, −25.3%; p < 0.001) and 29.7% lower among POP users (−39.1%, −17.9%; p < 0.001); no significant differences were seen among LNG-IUS or vaginal ring users. Ovarian volume was more than 50% reduced among COC and vaginal ring users (p < 0.001) but was unchanged among POP and LNG-IUS users.Conclusion: Assessment of ovarian reserve markers among users of all types of hormonal contraception should be interpreted cautiously and the type of contraceptive method considered.

Change in Vaginal Flora as Indicated by Pap Smear (Schröder’s Classification) in Women Using Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System “Mirena”—Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The use of intrauterine device alters the normal balance between vaginal flora. It might change cervicovaginal environment, which was suggested to increase the risk for vulvovaginitis. It was found that up to 85% of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users become amenorrheic 4 months after insertion, or bleed only sporadically. It was hypothesized that this would have a beneficial effect on vaginal flora maintaining normal balance. Objectives: The aim of this study was to detect the effect of hormonal intrauterine system (“Mirena”: 20 microgram/24 hours intrauterine delivery system Levonorgestrel) on vaginal flora by using pap smear before and 6 months after insertion. Study design: A prospective cohort study was carried out in a university maternity hospital. 210 subjects were included with pap smear taken at time of insertion of IUS “Mirena” and another one taken 6 months later to detect percentage of incidence of infection in IUS users. Vaginal flora was studied, and lactobacilli were graded according to Schr?der’s classification. A comparison was made to allow detection of changes in vaginal flora caused by presence of hormonal IUS “Mirena”. Results: Over half of cases (57.2%) showed worse vaginal flora after hormonal IUS “Mirena” insertion than before. There was a highly statistically significant difference between Schr?der’s Grades before and after insertion (P value < 0.001) as 44.8% of cases presented by Grade I, 44.4% of cases presented by grade IIa, 38% of cases presented by grade IIb before insertion developed Grade III after insertion. Conclusion: Insertion of hormonal IUS “Mirena” results in significant change in microbial flora towards pathological bacteria.

Control of endometriosis-associated pain with etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: randomized clinical trial

To assess the efficacy of an etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant or the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Noninferiority randomized clinical trial in which women with endometriosis were assigned to use an ENG implant (experimental treatment) or an LNG-IUS (active comparator). Monthly follow-up visits were conducted up to 6months. University teaching hospital. One hundred three women, with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, or both for more than 6months. In cases of deep endometriosis, vaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging were used as additional diagnostic tools. The ENG implant or the LNG-IUS were inserted within the first 5days of the menstrual cycle. Daily scores of noncyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea were evaluated using a daily visual analogue scale. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire at baseline and up to 6months. Bleeding patterns were assessed daily from a menstrual calendar. Both contraceptives improved significantly the mean visual analogue scale endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, without significant differences between treatment group profiles. Health-related quality of life improved significantly in all domains of the core and modular segments of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire, with no difference between both treatment groups. The most common bleeding patterns at 180days of follow-up were amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding and infrequent bleeding and spotting among ENG implant and LNG-IUS users, respectively. In this noninferiority study both contraceptives improved significantly pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and health-related quality of life in endometriosis. Clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT02480647.

Does levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system increase breast cancer risk in peri-menopausal women? An HMO perspective

PurposeTo evaluate the association between levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) use and breast cancer (BC) risk.MethodsA cohort of all Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) female members aged 40–50 years between 1/2003 and 12/2013 was used to identify LNG-IUS users as “cases,” and 2 age-matched non-users as “controls.” Exclusion criteria included: prior BC diagnosis, prior (5 years pre-study) and subsequent treatment with other female hormones or prophylactic tamoxifen. Invasive tumors were characterized by treatments received (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, trastuzumab, or combination thereof).ResultsThe analysis included 13,354 LNG-IUS users and 27,324 controls (mean age: 44.1 ± 2.6 vs. 44.9 ± 2.8 years; p < 0.0001). No significant differences in 5-year Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimates for overall BC risk or ductal carcinoma in situ occurrence were observed between groups. There was a trend towards higher risk for invasive BC in LNG-IUS users (5-year KM-estimate: 1.06% vs. 0.93%; p = 0.051). This difference stemmed primarily from the younger women (40–45 years; 0.88% vs. 0.69%, p = 0.014), whereas in older women (46–50 years), it was non-significant (1.44% vs. 1.21%; p = 0.26). Characterization of invasive BC by treatment demonstrated that LNG-IUS users had similar proportions of tumors treated with hormonal therapy, less tumors treated with trastuzumab, (7.5% vs. 14.5%) and more tumors treated with chemotherapy alone (25.8% vs. 14.9%; p = 0.041).ConclusionsIn peri-menopausal women, LNG-IUS was not associated with an increased total risk of BC, although in the subgroup of women in their early 40’s, it was associated with a slightly increased risk for invasive tumors.

Relationship between user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and bleeding patterns.

Satisfaction with a contraceptive method constitutes an important factor in its acceptance and long-term use. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between user satisfaction with the 20-μg/day levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the bleeding patterns reported at two different time-points during follow-up. A total of 251 LNG-IUS users aged 18-45 years were invited to answer a questionnaire on their return to the clinic for a routine follow-up visit and again 1 year later. Data were collected face-to-face. Twenty women discontinued prematurely; therefore, the analysis was performed on 231 women. Most users were either highly satisfied (66.6% and 66.2% at the first and second interviews, respectively) or satisfied (26.4% and 26.4% at the first and second interviews, respectively) with the LNG-IUS. Satisfaction was related to amenorrhea (P < 0.001) and duration of use (P < 0.001). Prolonged bleeding and spotting were the main causes of dissatisfaction with the device. Most LNG-IUS users in this sample were satisfied with the device. The only two factors associated with satisfaction were amenorrhea and duration of use, while prolonged bleeding and spotting were the main causes of dissatisfaction. These findings could be useful for health-care professionals and policy-makers when developing information material for women. The study provides insight into the profile of satisfied LNG-IUS users; however, this information is not suitable for counseling women who are considering using an LNG-IUS.

Assessment of the quality of cervical mucus among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system at different times of use

Background and objectives: The quality of cervical mucus (CM) among the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) users is controversial. The objectives were to assess CM compared to the levels of oestradiol (E2) and the frequency of cycles with luteal activity among users of the LNG-IUS.Materials and methods: In total, 224 LNG-IUS users for between two months and five years were recruited at a Brazilian family planning clinic. For the cross-sectional part of the study, we enrolled 175 LNG-IUS users at 2, 6 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after insertion (25 women in each group), and we performed one evaluation. For the prospective part of the study, we enrolled 49 LNG-IUS users at the same lengths of use after insertion (7 women in each group), and we evaluated these women once a week for five consecutive weeks. .Results: Mean (± SEM) CM scores of all evaluations among women with single and weekly evaluations were between 3.3 ± 0.9 and 8.5 ± 0.3, respectively independently of the length of use of the LNG-IUS. Mean E2 values ranged from 45.5 ± 6.8 to 472.5 ± 34.7 pg/ml and the maximum ovarian follicle diameter on the days of evaluation varied from 14.0 ± 1.3 to 31.2 ± 0.4 mm.Conclusions: The mean CM score of all evaluations, independent of the length of use of the LNG-IUS and normal levels of serum E2, was below 10 was according to the WHO is inadequate for sperm penetration.

Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use on the cancer risk of the ovary and fallopian tube

Background: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is used for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding. A long-term hormone therapy can modify the risk of gynecologic cancers. Little is known about the impact of LNG-IUS use on the risk for invasive and borderline ovarian tumor subtypes or for primary fallopian tube carcinoma. We examined the associations of LNG-IUS use with these tumors.Material and methods: We identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry of Finland the women aged 30–49 years who had used LNG-IUS for menorrhagia in 1994–2007, and from the Finnish Cancer Registry ovarian cancers and primary fallopian tube carcinomas diagnosed before the age of 55 and by the end of 2013.Results: A total of 77 invasive ovarian cancers and seven primary fallopian tube carcinoma cases were diagnosed in a cohort of 93 843 LNG-IUS users during the follow-up of 1 083 126 women-years. The LNG-IUS users had decreased risk for both invasive ovarian cancer [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.73] and for borderline ovarian tumors (SIR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57–0.99) as compared to the background population. The risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma was not increased (SIR 1.22, 95% CI 0.49–2.50). Decreased risks for mucinous (SIR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24–0.87), endometrioid (SIR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28–0.98), and serous ovarian carcinomas (SIR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55–0.99) were seen in LNG-IUS users.Conclusions: LNG-IUS use associated with decreased risk for both invasive and borderline ovarian tumors. The incidence of primary fallopian tube carcinoma did not significantly differ between LNG-IUS users and the background population.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and the risk of breast cancer: A nationwide cohort study

Background. Prolonged steroid hormone therapy increases the risk of breast cancer, especially the risk of lobular cancer, but the effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) use is controversial. In this study we aimed to test the hypothesis that risk for lobular breast cancer is elevated among LNG-IUS users.Material and methods. We identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry of Finland the women aged 30–49 who had used LNG-IUS for the treatment or prevention of menorrhagia in 1994–2007, and from the Finnish Cancer Registry breast cancers diagnosed before the age of 55 and by the end of 2012.Results. A total of 2015 women had breast cancer diagnosed in a cohort of 93 843 LNG-IUS users during follow-up consisting of 1 032 767 women-years. The LNG-IUS users had an increased risk for both ductal breast cancer [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–1.25] and for lobular breast cancer (SIR 1.33, 95% CI 1.20–1.46), as compared with the general female population. The highest risk was found in LNG-IUS users who purchased the device at least twice, whose SIR for lobular cancer was 1.73 (95% CI 1.37–2.15).Conclusions. The results imply that intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel is not only related to an excess risk of lobular breast cancer but also, in contrary to previous assumptions, to an excess risk of ductal breast cancer.

The continuation rates of long-acting reversible contraceptives in UK general practice using data from The Health Improvement Network.

The purpose of this study was to determine the continuation rates of new users of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods in the UK, using data from general practice. We conducted an observational study using a general practitioner (GP) database, The Health Improvement Network (THIN). The methods studied were copper intrauterine devices (Cu-IUDs), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), progestogen-only implants and progestogen-only injections. The study population comprised women in THIN aged 18-44 years during the period 2004-2009 who had been registered with their GP for at least 5 years, with a computerized prescription history of at least 1 year. Using computer algorithms, the database was searched for the Read and Multilex codes for each LARC method. New LARC users were identified and followed until there was a record indicating termination of use or the study period ended. The proportion of women who discontinued use during the same year of administration was 7.5% for Cu-IUDs, 10.6% for LNG-IUS, 13.2% for progestogen-only implants and 54.4% for progestogen-only injections. By the end of the study, a higher proportion of Cu-IUD and LNG-IUS users (21.1 and 18.6%, respectively) undertook consecutive use of the same method than progestogen-only implant users (10.7%). Manual review of computerized profiles demonstrated the validity of this approach. In the UK, the continuation rates of LARCs are high, and approximately one fifth of women chose to have a second intrauterine device fitted after expiry of the first device. A validation step demonstrated the reliability of the methodology and computer algorithms used.

Weight variation in users of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a copper intrauterine device for up to ten years of use

Background and objective Data on record regarding weight variation in depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) users are controversial. To date, no studies have yet evaluated weight variation in DMPA and LNG-IUS users in up to ten years of use compared to non-hormonal contraceptive users.Materials and methods A retrospective study analysed weight variations in 2138 women using uninterruptedly DMPA (150 mg intramuscularly, three-monthly; n = 714), the LNG-IUS (n = 701) or a copper-intrauterine device (Cu-IUD; n = 723).Results At the end of the first year of use, there was a mean weight increase of 1.3 kg, 0.7 kg and 0.2 kg among the DMPA-, LNG-IUS- and Cu-IUD users, respectively, compared to weight at baseline (p < 0.0001). After ten years of use, the mean weight had risen by 6.6 kg, 4.0 and 4.9 kg among the DMPA-, LNG-IUS- and Cu-IUD users, respectively. DMPA-users had gained more weight than LNG-IUS- (p = 0.0197) and than Cu-IUD users (p = 0.0294), with the latter two groups not differing significantly from each other in this respect (p = 0.5532).Conclusion Users of hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive methods gained a significant amount of weight over the years. DMPA users gained more weight over the treatment period of up to ten years than women fitted with either a LNG-IUS or a Cu-IUD.Chinese 摘要背景和目的 目前大多关于使用醋酸甲羟孕酮、左炔诺孕酮——宫内释放系统以及含铜宫内节育器避孕的妇女体重改变的资料数据是有争议的。到目前为止，还没有关于使用醋酸甲羟孕酮、左炔诺孕酮——宫内释放系统避孕与非激素避孕方法十年妇女体重变化的研究。材料和方法 回顾性地研究了2138名妇女，包括持续使用醋酸甲羟孕酮（每3个月肌肉注射150mg； n= 714），使用左炔诺孕酮—宫内释放系统(n= 701)或者使用含铜宫内节育器避孕(Cu-IUD; n= 723).结果 在所有的研究对象中，在使用的第一年末，相比较于她们的基础体重，使用醋酸甲羟孕酮、左炔诺孕酮—宫内释放系统以及含铜宫内节育器避孕的妇女分别有1.3 kg, 0.7 kg 和0.2 kg体重的增加(p ＜0.0001)。在使用十年以后，使用醋酸甲羟孕酮、左炔诺孕酮—宫内释放系统以及含铜宫内节育器避孕的妇女分别有6.6 kg, 4.0 和 4.9 kg体重的增加。与使用左炔诺孕酮—宫内释放系统和含铜宫内节育器避孕的妇女相比，使用醋酸甲羟孕酮避孕的妇女体重增加更多，p值分别为 0.0197和0.0294；而使用前二者避孕方法的妇女体重的改变相互没有显著性差异 (p= 0.5532).结论 长期使用不论是激素避孕还是非激素避孕方法的妇女体重都有显著增加。使用醋酸甲羟孕酮避孕十年的妇女比使用左炔诺孕酮—宫内释放系统以及含铜宫内节育器避孕的妇女的体重增加更多。

Cancer risk in women using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in Finland.

To examine the association between premenopausal use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and cancer incidence in Finland with a special focus on endometrial adenocarcinoma. All Finnish women aged 30-49 years using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of menorrhagia in 1994-2007 (n=93,843) were identified from the National Reimbursement Registry and linked to the Finnish Cancer Registry data. The incidence of cancers in levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users was compared with that in the general population. A total of 2,781 cancer cases were detected in levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users during the follow-up of 855,324 women-years. The standardized incidence ratio (observed-to-expected ratio) for endometrial adenocarcinoma was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.70; 34 observed compared with 68 expected cases) after the first levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system purchase and 0.25 (95% CI 0.05-0.73; three observed compared with 12 expected cases) after two purchases. The standardized incidence ratio for ovarian cancer was 0.60 (95% CI 0.45-0.76; 59 observed compared with 99 expected cases), for pancreatic cancer 0.50 (95% CI 0.28-0.81; 15 observed compared with 30 expected cases), and for lung cancer 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.91; 43 observed compared with 63 expected cases). The standardized incidence ratio for breast cancer among all levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users was 1.19 (95% CI 1.13-1.25; 1,542 observed compared with 1,292 expected cases). The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system may have a protective effect against endometrial malignant transformation. Using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of menorrhagia during reproductive years was associated with a lower incidence of endometrial, ovarian, pancreatic, and lung cancers than expected. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use was associated with a higher than expected incidence of breast cancer. II.

A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.

Does intensive counselling before insertion and throughout the first year of use have any influence on discontinuation rates due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding in users of three long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)? Intensive counselling had a similar effect to routine counselling in terms of discontinuation rates due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding in new users of the contraceptives. Contraceptive efficacy and satisfaction rates are very high with LARCs, including the etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD). However, unpredictable menstrual bleeding constitutes the principal reason for premature discontinuation, particularly in the cases of the ENG-implant and the LNG-IUS. A randomized clinical trial was conducted between 2011 and 2013, and involved 297 women: 98 ENG-implant users, 99 LNG-IUS users and 100 TCu380A IUD users. Women accepting each contraceptive method were randomized into two groups after the women chose their contraceptive method. Group I received routine counselling at the clinic, including information on safety, efficacy and side effects, as well as what to expect regarding bleeding disturbances. Group II received 'intensive counselling'. In addition to the information provided to those in Group I, these women also received leaflets on their chosen method and were seen by the same three professionals, the most experienced at the clinic, throughout the year of follow-up. These three professionals went over all the information provided at each consultation. Women in both groups were instructed to return to the clinic after 45 (±7) days and at 6 and 12 (±1) months after insertion. They were instructed to record all bleeding episodes on a menstrual calendar specifically provided for this purpose. Additionally, satisfaction with the method was evaluated by a questionnaire completed by the women after 12 months of use of the contraceptive method. There were no significant differences between the intensive and routine counselling groups on the discontinuation rates due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding of the three contraceptives under evaluation. The 1-year cumulative discontinuation rates due to menstrual bleeding irregularities were 2.1, 2.7 and 4.0% and the continuation rates were 82.6, 81.0 and 73.2%, for the ENG-implant, the LNG-IUS or the TCu380A IUD users, respectively. The main reasons for discontinuation of the methods were weight gain in users of the ENG-implant and expulsion of the TCu380A. The main limitations are that we cannot assure generalization of the results to another settings and that the routine counselling provided by our counsellors may already be appropriate for the women attending the clinic and so consequently intensive counselling including written leaflets was unable to influence the premature discontinuation rate due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding. Additionally, counselling could discourage some women from using the LARC methods offered in the study and consequently those women may have decided on other contraceptives. Routine counselling may be sufficient for many women to help reduce premature discontinuation rates and improve continuation rates and user satisfaction among new users of LARC methods. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01392157). The study was partially funded by the Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) grant # 2012/01379-0, the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) grant #573747/2008-3 and by Merck (MSD), Brazil under an unrestricted grant. The LNG-IUS were donated by the International Contraceptive Access Foundation (ICA) and the copper IUD by Injeflex, São Paulo, Brazil. L.B. has occasionally served on the Board of MSD, Bayer and Vifor.