Abstract: In recent years, the expansion of the global marketplace, driven by the digital revolution, has led to a growing complexity in trademark disputes. The balance between protecting intellectual property and preventing consumer confusion has become increasingly delicate. Traditionally, trademark law was designed primarily to prevent consumer confusion and ensure fair competition. However, with the introduction of the dilution concept, this focus has shifted, resulting in expanded trademark rights that can inhibit innovation and free competition. This paper revisits the original intent of trademark law, advocating for a refocus on consumer confusion as the core principle. Through an examination of legislative intent, theoretical underpinnings, and case law, this paper demonstrates the need to reorient trademark protections to ensure they serve the broader goal of market fairness and economic development. This research highlights that excessive protection of trademark rights can lead to monopolistic practices, which ultimately harm both consumers and market competition. It contributes to the ongoing discussion about how to balance trademark rights with consumer protection, aiming to guide future legal reforms that foster both innovation and competition.