Leftover Pills Research Articles

Discrepancy between antibiotic pack sizes and guideline recommendations: a real-world analysis based on claims data.

Antibiotics are often only available in predefined pack sizes, which may not align with guideline recommendations. This can result in leftover pills, leading to inappropriate self-medication or waste disposal, which can both foster the development of antibiotic resistance. The magnitude of inappropriate pack sizes is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential non-conformity of prescribed antibiotic pack sizes. This retrospective observational study was based on claims data from a large Swiss health insurance company. The study analysed the prescriptions of eleven different antibiotic substances recommended for the five most common indications for antibiotics in Switzerland. All prescriptions for adult outpatients issued by general practitioners in 2022 were included and extrapolated to the entire Swiss population. Potential non-conformity was defined as a mismatch between the total dosage in a pack and the total dosage recommended. A total of n = 947,439 extrapolated prescriptions were analysed. In 10 of 23 of all analysed substance/indication combinations none of the prescribed packs aligned with the respective guideline recommendation. Considering pack sizes in which the total prescribed dosage of a substance did not correspond to any of the total dosages recommended in at least one of the guidelines, 31.6% of prescriptions were potentially non-conform and an estimated number of 2.7million tablets were overprescribed. We found a large discrepancy between prescribed pack sizes and guideline recommendations. Since inadequately prepacked antibiotics may lead to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary waste, efforts are needed to implement alternatives like exact pill dispensing.

Opioid consumption following foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review

Objective: Systematically review studies characterizing postoperative opioid consumption in patients submitted to foot and anklesurgery to identify trends in opioid consumption among regions of procedures (forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot/ankle) and ultimatelycreate prescribing guidelines that treat patient’s pain adequately while limiting leftover pills. Methods: A systematic review was performed following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies that reported mean opioid consumption following foot and ankle surgery were included, as well as data from our institution that fit the review’s parameters. Studies that did not report this data or reported patients receiving alternative surgical techniques were excluded. The risk of bias in non-randomized studies – of exposure (ROBINS-E) tool and the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria were used to assess bias and study quality, respectively. Results: Three hundred ninety-five articles were identified, and six studies, including our institution’s, met inclusion criteria. Reported data from 2,445 patients were synthesized to show opioid consumption overall, by region of surgery, and by invasiveness of procedure. Four of five studies found significantly higher opioid use postoperatively in patients submitted to hindfoot/ankle surgery, and two of five studies found significantly higher consumption among those submitted to bony foot and ankle surgery. Conclusion: Prescribing physicians must approach foot and ankle patients on a case-by-case basis to ensure adequate pain management while mitigating excess opioid risk. For prescriptions of 5 mg oxycodone pills, we recommend 15-, 20-, and 25-pill prescriptions for patients submitted to forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot/ankle surgery. Level of Evidence I; Systematic review.

A practice already in use: a snapshot survey on the use of doxycycline as a preventive strategy (Doxy-PEP and Doxy-PrEP) in the GBMSM population in Spain.

. While doxycycline shows promise as a preventative measure against certain STIs (post-exposure prophylaxis or PEP, and pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP), very few medical and scientific associations favor its community use. Nevertheless, sexual health organizations for gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) community have noticed an increase in requests of its use. . The sexual health organization "Stop Sida" in Spain launched an anonymous snapshot survey to evaluate the current use of doxycycline as prevention strategy (both PEP and PrEP) in Spain through its social networks and its support groups in telegram. . 150 valid answers were obtained from different parts of Spain. 82 respondents (54,6% of total) had ever taken doxycycline, out of which 29 (35,4%) indicated the use as doxy-PEP and 7 (8,5%) as doxy-PrEP. The self-reported rate of STI diagnoses (mainly of syphilis and chlamydia) in the past 12 months was lower among those participants who reported having used doxy-PEP compared with those who did not report using doxy-PEP. The most common ways to obtain the doxycycline were telling a specialist that they have had a risky contact or by using leftover pills from a previous treatment. The current study is the first study to describe the use of doxycycline as a preventive strategy among the GBMSM community in Spain, and the first designed, launched and analyzed entirely by an NGO dealing with sexual health for the GBMSM community. The results obtained are aligned with other studies in other parts of Europe, such as Germany.

Opioid Consumption Following Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review

Category: Other; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The opioid epidemic in the United States has gained significant attention over the past few years. Subsequently, there have been several publications characterizing postoperative opioid consumption in patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery. Our goal was to systematically review the literature to identify trends in opioid consumption between procedures of the forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot and ankle and ultimately create finalized prescribing guidelines that treat patients’ pain adequately while limiting leftover pills. Methods: A systematic review was performed in concordance with the MOOSE guidelines. We included retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies that reported on mean opioid consumption following foot and ankle surgery, as well as unpublished data from our institution that fit the review’s parameters. We excluded studies that did not report this data or reported patients receiving alternative surgical techniques. The ROBINS-E tool was used to assess bias and the MINORS criteria was used to evaluate study quality. Results: Six studies met inclusion criteria from 395 identified articles. Reported data from 2,445 patients were analyzed for overall opioid consumption, region of surgery, and invasiveness of procedure. Five studies standardized opioids prescribed and consumed to a 5-milligram oxycodone "pill." Of the three studies reporting mean pill consumption by region of surgery, 16.1, 27.8, and 26.4 pills were consumed by forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot patients, respectively. The largest mean and median pill consumption was observed in hindfoot patients (45.7 and 22, respectively). 4 of 5 studies found significantly higher opioid use in hindfoot and ankle patients, and 2 of 5 studies found significantly higher consumption among those undergoing bony versus soft-tissue procedures. Across all studies, patients used 45.7%-75.2% of their opioid prescriptions. Conclusion: In this systematic review, we identify literature reported mean number of recommended pills to be subscribed for each anatomical region, as prescriptions could be decreased by around half and still adequately control pain. This can be of significant aid in providing final guidelines to orthopedic surgeons to finalize prescription patterns in foot and ankle surgery based on the published literature.

Translated article] Adherence and quality of life in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with oral antineoplastic drugs

ObjectiveTo evaluate adherence and quality of life to oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. To compare adherence and quality of life according to treatment subgroups and treatment-line subgroups. MethodsWe conducted a descriptive prospective study from June to November 2021 in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, seen at the Oncology Pharmacy and treated with oral antineoplastic drugs for at least 6 months prior to inclusion in the study were included. Adherence was assessed using Morisky's 8 item Medication Adherence Scale and leftover pills counts, considering adherents if their adherence rate was ≥90%. Quality of life was assessed with Euro-Qol EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue scale and QLQ-C30 questionnaire from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Two interviews were scheduled: at the time of inclusion and at 3 months. The clinical history was reviewed and demographic and clinical variables were collected. The data statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS® 25.0 software. ResultsTwenty three patients were included, all of them showed an adherence rate higher than 90%; 20 patients were considered high adherent, and 3 patients médium adherent to treatment according to Morisky's 8 item Medication Adherence Scale. The results of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire showed that the patients were all of them autonomous in their personal care and daily activities, 69.6% did not have any mobility problems and 78.3% did not have anxiety/depression; 56.5% had some type of pain. Eighteen patients had no fatigue, and 5 had mild/moderate fatigue according to Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue scale. The results of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire showed that patients had a high /healthy functional level, a good quality of life and a low level of symptoms. Analysis by treatment subgroups and by treatment-line subgroups did not show statistically significant differences in adherence or quality of life. ConclusionsPatients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and treated with oral antineoplastic therapies showed a high adherence rate and referred a good quality of life.

Adherencia y calidad de vida en los pacientes con leucemia linfocítica crónica tratados con antineoplásicos orales

ObjectiveTo evaluate adherence and quality of life to oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. To compare adherence and QoL according to treatment subgroups and treatment-line subgroups. MethodsWe conducted a descriptive prospective study from June to November 2021 in a tertiary care hospital. Patients treated at the Oncology Pharmacy with a diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and treatment with oral antineoplastics for at least 6 months before inclusion in the study were included. Adherence was assessed using Morisky’s 8 item Medication Adherence Scale and leftover pills counts, considering adherents if their adherence rate was ≥ 90%. Quality of life was assessed with Euro-Qol EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue scale and QLQ-C30 questionnaire from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Two interviews were scheduled: at the time of inclusion and at 3 months. Variable collected: demographic data, clinical data (disease and treatment); and response (scores obtained from questionnaires and adherence rate). The data statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS® 25.0 software. ResultsTwenty three patients were included, all of them showed an adherence rate higher than 90%; 20 patients were considered high adherent, and 3 patients medium adherent to treatment according to Morisky’s 8 item Medication Adherence Scale. The results of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire showed that the patients were all of them autonomous in their personal care and daily activities, 69.6% did not have any mobility problems and 78.3% did not have anxiety/depression; 56.5% had some type of pain. Eighteen patients had no fatigue, and 5 had mild/moderate fatigue according to Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue scale. The results of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire showed that patients had a high /healthy functional level, a good quality of life and a low level of symptoms. Analysis by treatment subgroups and by treatment-line subgroups did not show statistically significant differences in adherence or quality of life. ConclusionsPatients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and treated with oral antineoplastic therapies showed a high adherence rate and referred a good quality of life.

Opioid use after elective spine surgery: Do spine surgery patients consume less than prescribed today?

BackgroundThe opioid epidemic in the US has led prescribers to reevaluate postoperative pain control particularly in the field of spine surgery, where postoperative analgesia requirements and consumption have historically been high. There is a need to mitigate the quantity of unused pills after surgery by adjusting prescribing practices. Achieving the balance of pain control after surgery without overprescribing opioids may be accomplished by developing a modified approach to prescribing practices; however, there is a need to first understand the opioid requirements of the modern spine surgery patient with respect to their elective spine surgery. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine the percentage of opioids not utilized at 90-days after elective spine surgery. Secondary aims were to identify differences in the percentage of unused opioids between surgical subgroups and preoperative opioid status, to determine factors associated with opioid utilization, and to estimate the distribution of opioids consumed to control pain up to the 90th percentile in each surgical subgroup. MethodsIn this prospective, observational cohort study, adults undergoing elective spine surgery at a multi-surgeon, single center were prospectively enrolled and divided into subgroups: anterior cervical, lumbar decompression, and short-segment lumbar fusion. Prescribed MMEs were identified from prescriptions, consumed MMEs were obtained from pill counts, and the percent leftover was calculated. Distributions of MMEs consumed were analyzed to compare utilization between preoperative opioid users or non-users within each surgical subgroup. ResultsOf 117 patients, 41.9% were preoperative opioid users. The percentage of unused opioids by surgical subgroup was: 45.4% cervical, 57.3% lumbar decompression, and 37.4% lumbar fusion (p=0.066). The percentage of unused opioids by preoperative opioid exposure was greater in the opioid non-users (58.0%) than users (28.4%, p<0.001)). Regression analysis showed that surgical subgroup and preoperative opioid exposure were associated with leftover opioids. ConclusionsAt 90-days, the percentage of unused opioids was over 45% in this cohort of elective spine surgery patients and was nearly double in the group without preoperative opioid exposure. These results suggest the modern elective spine surgery patient is using less opioids than prescribed, supporting the conclusion that the number of MMEs prescribed can be reduced to minimize quantities of leftover pills available for diversion, without sacrificing the priority of appropriate postoperative pain control.

Surgery Prescription Opioid Misuse and Diversion in US Adults and Associated Risk Factors.

To justify a practice change, it is critical to determine if opioids prescribed after surgery, surgery prescription (Rx) opioids, are in fact associated with opioid misuse and diversion. Currently, there is only limited data to support this assumption. We administered a 40-question survey to US adults (18+) who had received a surgery Rx opioid within the last 5y on Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing worksite. Incidence and risk factors for surgery Rx opioid misuse, self-reported taking of surgery Rx opioids in a way other than instructed by a provider, and diversion, self-reported having one's surgery Rx opioids shared, sold, or stolen, were analyzed. The government validated Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) was used. A total of 966 participants from all 50 states met inclusion: 52% were male, 43% were aged 30-39y, and 79% self-identified as white. Overall, 34% (n=333) of respondents reported misusing their surgery Rx opioids and risk factors included working in healthcare, scoring high on the ORT, experiencing an elevated mood with opioids, refilling a Rx, and keeping leftover pills. A total of 22% (n=212) reported diverting their surgery Rx opioids, and risk factors included working in healthcare, scoring high on the ORT, undergoing plastic surgery, refilling a Rx, and keeping leftover pills. Rates of surgery Rx opioid misuse and diversion in the US may be as high as one in three and one in five adults, respectively. Efforts to improve leftover pill disposal and risk stratification for prescribing patterns may help to mitigate risk.

Factors Associated With Safe Prescription Opioid Disposal After Surgery in Adolescents

IntroductionUnused prescription opioids contribute to diversion, unintended exposure, and poisonings in adolescents. Factors associated with safe prescription opioid disposal for adolescents undergoing surgery are unknown. MethodsParents of adolescents (13-20 y) undergoing surgery associated with an opioid prescription were enrolled preoperatively. Parents completed a baseline survey measuring sociodemographics and family history of substance abuse and two postoperative surveys capturing opioid use and disposal at 30 and 90 d. Safe disposal was defined as returning opioids to a healthcare facility, pharmacy, take-back event, or a police station. Factors associated with safe opioid disposal were assessed using bivariate analysis. ResultsOf 119 parent-adolescent dyads, 90 (76%) reported unused opioids after surgery. The majority of parents reporting unused opioids completed the surveys in English (80%), although many (44%) spoke another language at home. Most reported income levels <$60,000 (54%), did not attend college (69%), and had adequate health literacy (66%). Most parents (78%) did not report safe opioid disposal. Safe opioid disposal was associated with younger patient age, (median 14 y, IQR 13-16.5 versus median 15.5 y, IQR 14-17, P = 0.031), fewer days taking opioids (median 5, IQR 2-6 versus median 7, IQR 4-14, P = 0.048), and more leftover pills (median 20, IQR 10-35 versus median 10, IQR 5-22, P = 0.008). ConclusionsMost parents fail to safely dispose of unused opioids after their adolescent’s surgery. Younger patient age, shorter duration of opioid use, and higher number of unused pills were associated with safe disposal. Interventions to optimize prescribing and educate parents about safe opioid disposal are warranted.

The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study (OARS)\u2014a comparison of opioid vs. non-opioid combination analgesics for management of post-surgical pain: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

BackgroundEveryday people die unnecessarily from opioid overdose-related addiction. Dentists are among the leading prescribers of opioid analgesics. Opioid-seeking behaviors have been linked to receipt of initial opioid prescriptions following the common dental procedure of third molar extraction. With each opioid prescription, a patient’s risk for opioid misuse or abuse increases. With an estimated 56 million tablets of 5 mg hydrocodone annually prescribed after third molar extractions in the USA, 3.5 million young adults may be unnecessarily exposed to opioids by dentists who are inadvertently increasing their patient’s risk for addiction.MethodsA double-blind, stratified randomized, multi-center clinical trial has been designed to evaluate whether a combination of over-the-counter non-opioid-containing analgesics is not inferior to the most prescribed opioid analgesic. The impacted 3rd molar extraction model is being used due to the predictable severity of the post-operative pain and generalizability of results. Within each site/clinic and gender type (male/female), patients are randomized to receive either OPIOID (hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/300 mg) or NON-OPIOID (ibuprofen/acetaminophen 400/500 mg). Outcome data include pain levels, adverse events, overall patient satisfaction, ability to sleep, and ability to perform daily functions. To develop clinical guidelines and a clinical decision-making tool, pain management, extraction difficulty, and the number of tablets taken are being collected, enabling an experimental decision-making tool to be developed.DiscussionThe proposed methods address the shortcomings of other analgesic studies. Although prior studies have tested short-term effects of single doses of pain medications, patients and their dentists are interested in managing pain for the entire post-operative period, not just the first 12 h. After surgery, patients expect to be able to perform normal daily functions without feeling nauseous or dizzy and they desire a restful sleep at night. Parents of young people are concerned with the risks of opioid use and misuse, related either to treatments received or to subsequent use of leftover pills. Upon successful completion of this clinical trial, dentists, patients, and their families will be better able to make informed decisions regarding post-operative pain management.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04452344. Registered on June 20, 2020

The Use of Opioid Analgesia after Surgery: Assessing Postoperative Prescriptions from a Patient and Surgeon Perspective

Purpose: Nonmedical use of prescription opioids continues to be a public health crisis in the United States that disproportionately affects rural communities with diversion of pills from friends and family being the most common source. The primary goal of the study was to identify current opioid prescription practices, and to assess the discrepancy in amount of opioids prescribed by surgeons versus the amount needed post-operatively by patients. Patient factors that may influence postoperative analgesia needs and their management of leftover prescription opioids were also evaluatedMethods: Patients ≥18 years-of-age who underwent a surgery between July and December 2018 by the subspecialty departments of Acute Care and General Surgery at a tertiary care facility in the rural Midwest were surveyed at their first post-operative visit to assess their postoperative analgesic needs. Resident and attending surgeons in the above departments were also surveyed to identify different factors that influenced their narcotic prescription practices.Results: Surveys from 252 patients, 12 attending surgeons, and 14 general surgery residents met inclusion criteria. Of patients who received a narcotic prescription, 19.9% did not fill their prescription, 64.1% of whom were >60 years old, and 72.1% resided within an hour of the hospital. Average reported prescription size was 11-40 pills; however, most used more than 5 pills regardless of the type of operation (P=0.59) and history of chronic pain (P=0.07). Inability to call in narcotic prescriptions and patients' distance from care influenced providers' prescription practices, with 77.9% of resident physicians and 68.3% of attending surgeons stating they would prescribe fewer if given the ability to call in a narcotic prescription.Conclusions: Regardless of the operation complexity, a majority of patients required fewer than five opioid pills after discharge and would be willing to return leftover pills. Development of opioid stewardship programs within the healthcare sector may reduce the number of opioids available for diversion and misuse.

Use of post-discharge opioid consumption patterns as a tool for evaluating opioid prescribing guidelines

BackgroundLeftover pills from postoperative opioid prescriptions place patients and members of their communities at risk for opioid misuse. We aimed to better understand patients’ post-discharge opioid consumption patterns to inform new methods of postoperative opioid prescribing. MethodsWe assessed post-discharge opioid consumption of general surgery patients and assessed the adequacy of discharge opioid prescriptions. We then compared patient opioid consumption to a number of theoretical discharge prescriptions based on different opioid prescribing guidelines and a proposed discharge prescription based on the metric 24-h pre-discharge opioid consumption (PDOC). Results62/99 patients (62.6%) returned an opioid log book. Median 24-h PDOC was 22.5 MME (IQR 5.0–45.0) and median discharge prescription size was 15 pills (IQR:10–20). Prescriptions were adequate for 83.7% of patients. The median number of pills used was 3 (IQR:0–11) and median time to opioid cessation was 3 days (IQR:0–5). Actual prescriptions were consistent with national opioid prescribing guidelines. Prescriptions based on the formula 2 × 24-h PDOC would have decreased the number of leftover pills by 7.5 per patient. ConclusionsDespite prescribing opioids consistent with national opioid prescribing guidelines, patients still receive too many pills. Improved opioid prescribing could be accomplished by use of the formula 2 × 24-h PDOC.

Using an Environmentally Friendly Disposal Bag to Discard Leftover Opioids After Gynecologic Surgery.

To evaluate the effects of an environmentally friendly drug deactivation bag on opioid disposal among patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. This prospective cohort study included patients undergoing gynecologic procedures requiring an opioid prescription from March 2020 to December 2020. Patients were managed on a restrictive opioid prescribing algorithm and given an opioid disposal bag. The carbon drug deactivation bag neutralizes the opioid medication and can be discarded safely in the trash. Patients were educated about pain management goals and the disposal bag. Patients were surveyed at their postoperative visit to evaluate satisfaction, number of leftover pills, and disposal methods. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 26. Two hundred patients were asked to complete the survey, with a response rate of 78%. The most common procedures were exploratory laparotomy (50%) and minimally invasive hysterectomy (41%). Most patients (91%, 95% CI 91-97) filled their opioid prescription and 64 (41%, 95% CI 34-48) had leftover opioid pills. Most patients with leftover opioid pills (73%, 95% CI 67-79) discarded them; 78%, 95% CI 69-80 used the disposal bag. Patients undergoing an exploratory laparotomy most commonly used the disposal bag. All patients who used the disposal bag stated they would use it again. Despite a restrictive opioid prescribing algorithm, 41% of gynecologic surgical patients had leftover opioid pills. This study demonstrated that leftover opioid pills were safely discarded 73% of the time when patients were provided an opioid disposal bag and preoperative education.

Optimizing Post-Cesarean Opioid Prescription Practices at Mayo Clinic: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Optimal prescriptions practices of opioids in the post-cesarean period remain controversial. The primary aim of this initiative was to minimize unused prescription narcotic medication, with a goal of ≤4 leftover pills of 5-mg oxycodone at postoperative day (POD) 14 without affecting pain or satisfaction measures. This was a prospective longitudinal quality improvement (QI) initiative starting in 2017 utilizing the DMAIC methodology. The measurement phase consisted of validated surveys over 3 months, along with chart review to determine current institutional prescription practices and predictors of outpatient opioid use. Resulting recommendations were adopted, and 1 year later, all patients undergoing cesarean were surveyed for 3 months to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. The study was approved by the Department's QI Committee. The response rate was 48%, with 50 of 101 patients completing surveys pre-intervention and 52 of 111 post-intervention. Pre-intervention, surplus medication was predicted (p <0.05) only by the quantity of the opioid prescription. In addition, patients who required ≤37.5 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) during the inpatient postoperative stay did not require outpatient narcotic prescriptions. Thereafter, a strategy of matching inpatient use to outpatient prescription 1:1 in a linear regression model (p <0.001, R 2 0.55) optimally matched patient needs up to 200 MME. In the post-intervention survey, mean (SD) prescription decreased from 17.6 (13.7) MME to 8.4 (8.3) MME (p <0.01); 39% compared with 16% of women were discharged without a prescription (p <0.01); and amongst all patients 82.7% compared with 59.6% (p <0.01) had ≤4 pills remaining without differences in patient satisfaction or pain perception. This initiative highlights a practical approach to QI utilizing industry techniques in health care. This approach resulted in significant reductions in over-prescription and unused medication, without impacting pain or satisfaction scores. · 20% of patients may manage pain at home without opioids.. · In-hospital opioid use is reflective of outpatient need.. · Customize prescriptions to reduce leftover narcotics..

Use of An Opioid Disposal Bag for Leftover Pills in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Surgery

Use of An Opioid Disposal Bag for Leftover Pills in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Surgery

Opioid disposal rates after spine surgery.

Background: Diversion of prescription opioids pills is a significant contributor to opioid misuse and the opioid epidemic. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency and quantity of excess opioid pills among patients undergoing spine surgery. Further, we wanted to determine the frequency of appropriate opioid disposal.Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective spine surgery within a multi-hospital, academic, urban university health system enrolled in a text-messaging program used to track postoperative opioid disposal. Patients who self-reported discontinuation of opioid use but with leftover pills were contacted via telephone and surveyed on opioid disposal.Results: Of the 291 patients who enrolled in the text-messaging program, 192 (66%) patients reported discontinuing opioids within 3 months of surgery. Although 76 (40%) reported excess opioid pills after cessation of use, only 47 (62%) participated in the telephone survey regarding opioid disposal. The median number of leftover pills among these 47 patients was 5 (5, 15) and 64% had not disposed of their prescription.Conclusion: Among the 47 telephone survey participants, a persistent gap remained in postoperative opioid excess and improper disposal. Future efforts must focus on initiatives to improve opioid disposal rates to reduce the quantity of opioids at risk for diversion and to reduce excess prescribing.

Use of an opioid disposal bag for leftover pills in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing surgery

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of an environmentally-friendly drug deactivation bag on opioid disposal in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing surgery. Methods: This descriptive study included gynecology oncology patients undergoing any surgical procedure requiring an opioid prescription from 3/2020-9/2020. Patients were managed on a restrictive opioid prescribing algorithm (ROPA) and given an opioid disposal bag at their preoperative visit. The carbon drug deactivation bag used neutralizes the opioid medication and is environmentally friendly making it disposable in the trash. Patients were educated preoperatively about pain management goals, the disposal bag, and the ROPA. Patients were asked to complete a survey at their postoperative visit evaluating patient satisfaction, number of leftover pills, and disposal methods. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics v.25. Results: 140 patients were asked to complete the survey. The response rate was 78.5% (110 patients). The most common procedures were exploratory laparotomy (36.3%) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (32.7%). Ovarian and endometrial cancer were the most frequent diagnoses (17.2% and 27.3%, respectively). 91.8% of patients filled their opioid prescription and 47 (42.7%) had leftover pain medications. 55.3% of patients with leftover medications used the deactivation bag to dispose of them, 12.8% flushed or threw them away, and 31.9% did not dispose of them. Leftover opioid pill amounts included: Conclusions: Despite a restrictive opioid prescribing practice, 40% of patients had leftover opioids. Over half of these patients used the opioid disposal bag to discard their leftover pills. The disposal bag was most commonly used by patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy given the larger number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge. The use of a drug deactivation bag is unlikely to be beneficial in patients undergoing minor outpatient surgery.

The Association between Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathway with Standardized Discharge Prescriptions and Opioid Use and Pain Experience after Cesarean Delivery.

This study was aimed to evaluate opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD) and to assess implementation of an enhanced recovery after CD (ERAS-CD) pathway and its association with inpatient and postdischarge pain control and opioid use. We conducted a baseline survey of women who underwent CD from January to March 2017 at a single, urban academic hospital. Patients were called 5 to 8 days after discharge and asked about their pain and postdischarge opioid use. An ERAS-CD pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative, including use of nonopioid analgesia and standardization of opioid discharge prescriptions to ≤25 tablets of oxycodone of 5 mg. From November to January 2019, a postimplementation survey was conducted to assess the association between this initiative and patients' pain control and postoperative opioid use, both inpatient and postdischarge. Data were obtained from 152 women preimplementation (PRE) and 137 women post-implementation (POST); complete survey data were obtained from 102 women PRE and 98 women POST. The median inpatient morphine milligram equivalents consumed per patient decreased significantly from 141 [range: 90-195] PRE to 114 [range: 45-168] POST (p = 0.002). On a 0- to 10-point scale, median patient-reported pain scores at discharge decreased significantly (PRE: 7 [range: 5-8] vs. POST 5 [range: 3-7], p < 0.001). The median number of pills consumed after discharge also decreased significantly (PRE: 25 [range: 16-30] vs. POST 17.5 [range: 4-25], p = 0.001). The number of pills consumed was significantly associated with number prescribed (p < 0.001). The median number of leftover pills and number of refills did not significantly differ between groups. Median patient-reported pain scores at the week after discharge were lower in the POST group (PRE: 4 [range: 2-6] vs. POST 3[range: 1-5], p = 0.03). Implementing an ERAS-CD pathway was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient and postdischarge opioid consumption while improving pain control. Our data suggest that even fewer pills could be prescribed for some patients. · An ERAS-CD pathway was associated with decreased opioid use.. · Outpatient opioid consumption after cesarean warrants further study.. · Physician prescribing drives patients' opioid consumption..

Patient-centered Opioid Prescribing: Breaking Away From One-Size-Fits-All Prescribing Guidelines

BackgroundProcedure-based opioid-prescribing guidelines have reduced the amount of opioids prescribed after surgery; however, many patients are still overprescribed opioids. The 24-h predischarge opioid consumption (PDOC) metric has been proposed to guide patient-centered prescribing. Materials and methodsThis is a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. We assessed the correlation between inpatient opioid use and discharge prescriptions using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). The adequacy of discharge prescriptions for individual patients was assessed using 2 models, one assuming constant opioid use (based on 24-h PDOC) and the other assuming a linear taper. ResultsOf 596 included patients, gastric bypass and colectomy were the most common operations. Median length of stay was 3.5 d. Inpatient opioid use and discharge prescriptions were weakly correlated (r = 0.35). Patients with no opioid use 24 h before discharge (n = 133, 22.3%) were frequently discharged with opioid prescriptions. Patients with high opioid use (24-h PDOC >60 MME) were often discharged with prescriptions that would have lasted <48 h (164/200, 82%). Assuming constant opioid use, discharge prescriptions would have lasted patients a median of 5.1 d. With linear opioid tapering, 440 (72.9%) patients would have had leftover pills. A theoretical discharge prescription of 4 times 24-h PDOC would reduce the median prescription by 130 MMEs and allow a linear taper for 97.6% of patients. ConclusionsAt our institution, opioid prescribing was rarely patient-centered, with little correlation between patient's inpatient opioid use and discharge prescriptions. This leads to overprescribing for most patients and underprescribing for others.

Guidelines for Patient-CenteredOpioid Prescribing and Optimal FDA-Compliant Disposal of Excess Pills after Inpatient Operation: Prospective Clinical Trial

To optimize responsible opioid prescribing after inpatient operation, we implemented a clinical trial with the following objectives: prospectively validate patient-centered opioid prescription guidelines and increase the FDA-compliant disposal rate of leftover opioid pills to higher than currently reported rates of 20% to 30%. We prospectively enrolled 229 patients admitted for 48 hours or longer after elective general, colorectal, urologic, gynecologic, or thoracic operation. At discharge, patients received a prescription for both nonopioid analgesics and opioids based on their opioid usage the day before discharge: if 0 oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were used, then five 5-mg oxycodone pill-equivalents were prescribed; if 1 to 29 MME were used, then fifteen 5-mg oxycodone pill-equivalents were prescribed; if 30 or more MME were used, then thirty 5-mg oxycodone pill-equivalents were prescribed. We considered patients' opioid pain medication needs to be satisfied if no opioid refills were obtained. To improve FDA-compliant disposal of leftover pills, we implemented patient education, convenient drop-box, reminder phone call, and questionnaire. Our opioid guideline satisfied 93% (213 of 229) of patients. Satisfaction was significantly higher in lower opioid usage groups (p= 0.001): 99% (99 of 100) in the 0 MME group, 90% (91 of 101) in the 1 to 29 MME group, and 82% (23 of 28) in the 30 or more MME group. Overall, 95% (217 of 229) of patients used nonopioid analgesics. Sixty percent (138 of 229) had leftover pills; 83% (114 of 138) disposed of them using an FDA-compliant method and 51% (58 of 114) used the convenient drop-box. Of 2,604 prescribed pills, only 187 (7%) were kept by patients. This clinical trial prospectively validated a patient-centered opioid discharge prescription guideline that satisfied 93% of patients. FDA-compliant disposal of excess pills was achieved in 83% of patients with easily actionable interventions.