Left Ventricular Epicardial Pacing Research Articles

Cardiac resynchronization therapy using endocardial versus trans-coronary sinus, epicardial left ventricular pacing: the Epi-Endo study

Abstract Aims Some studies have suggested that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing (Endo-CRT) is superior to a conventional transvenous, epicardial CRT (Epi-CRT). To determine whether, in CRT recipients, endocardial LV pacing is haemodynamically superior to trans-coronary vein (trans-CV) LV epicardial pacing. Methods and results At implantation patients (n=16; aged 68.9±8.32 years; 13 male) underwent Epi-CRT and Endo-CRT in basal, mid and apical myocardial segments, delivered using the trans-CS lead and an intra-cavitary, roving EP catheter to achieve juxtapositions of the epicardial and endocardial side of the LV free wall respectively. Myocardial scar was quantified using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. An acute haemodynamic response (AHR) was defined as a ≥10% increase in the maximal rate of rise of LV pressure (%LV dP/dtmax) in relation to RV pacing (DOO). When the 84 paired segments were taken together, the %ΔLV dP/dtmax was higher with Endo-CRT than with Epi-CRT (9.9±8,6% vs 7.9±8.3% respectively, p<0.002; 52.3% vs 28.6% responders [p<0.045). However, Endo-CRT was not always superior to epi-CRT in individual patients. For example, in basal segments, only 5/10 (50%) patients were converted from non-responders with epi-CRT to responders with endo-CRT whereas 1/4 (25%) epi-CRT responder was converted to a non-responder with endo-CRT (Figure). There was no difference in ΔLV dP/dtmax between Epi-CRT and endo-CRT in segments with myocardial scar. Conclusions On average, endo-CRT provides a better AHR than epi-CRT. Within patients, however, endo-CRT is not always better.Epicardial versus Endocardial CRT

Proarrhythmic effect of bipolar epicardial left ventricular stimulation in CRT resolved maintaining biventricular pacing with unipolar-cathodical configuration: A peculiar case report.

The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is controversial. Several studies reported a decreased risk, but some studies reported a potential proarrhythmic effect of epicardial left ventricular pacing resolved upon discontinuation of biventricular pacing (BiVp). A 67-year-old woman with a history of heart failure due to nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block was hospitalized for CRT device implantation. Unpredictably, as soon as the leads have been connected to the generator, an electrical storm (ES) occurred with relapsing self-resolving polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) triggered by ventricular extra beats with short-long-short sequences. The ES was resolved without interrupting BiVp switching to unipolar left ventricular (LV) pacing. This allowed to keep CRT active with extreme clinical benefit for the patient and to demonstrate that the cause of the PVT was the anodic capture of bipolar LV stimulation. Reverse electrical remodeling was also demonstrated after 3 months of effective BiVp. Proarrhythmic effect of CRT is a rare but significant complication of CRT, and it may compel to discontinuation of the BiVp. The reversal of the physiological transmural activation sequence of epicardial LV pacing and subsequent prolonging of corrected QT interval have been speculated as the most probable explanation, but our case highlights the possibility that the anodic capture may play a relevant role in PVT genesis.

Kardiyak Resenkronizasyon Tedavisinin Ventriküler Repolarizasyon Parametreleri ve Ventriküler Aritmiler Üzerindeki Etkisi

Objective: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is commonly used in patients with heart failure (HF) along with left ventricular mechanic and electrical dyssencrony. Left ventricular epicardial pacing in CRT patients changes the normal myocardial activation and increases the transmural dispersion of repolarization. We aimed to investigate the impact of CRT on repolarization parameters and reveal its consequences on arrhythmic events.
 Materials and Methods: The study consisted of 54 patients treated with CRT. Repolarization parameters; QT, T peak-to-T end and JT, Tpe/QT, QT dispersion and Tpe dispersion were measured. The patients were also investigated in two subgroups according to the presence of ventricular arrhythmias at the end of follow-up. Subgroups were compared in terms of repolarization parameters.
 Results The change in repolarization parameters according to baseline values were also compared in the whole group.In the whole study group, all of the repolarization parameters significantly increased in the acute phase. In the chronic phase, these abnormalities were significantly diminished. The comparison of the two subgroups did not show any significant difference in respect of repolarization parameters. 
 Conclusion: Epicardial pacing prolongs myocardial repolarization time and increases transmural dispersion of repolarization. However, these abnormalities were transient and were not associated with ventricular arrhythmias.

Endocardial pacing results in better electrical resynchronization and hemodynamic improvement than epicardial pacing in CRT

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The original study was financially supported by Medtronic (Minneapolis, Minnesota). The investigation of the current abstract is unrelated to the original financial support. Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is conventionally applied by means of a transvenous epicardial left ventricular (LV) lead. Studies suggest that endocardial LV pacing may result in better resynchronization and LV function than epicardial LV pacing. Purpose To investigate whether endocardial pacing results in better electrical resynchronization and hemodynamic improvement compared to epicardial pacing. Methods Patients with an indication for CRT were prospectively included from two hospitals. In all patients, LV pacing was performed endocardially and epicardially in the postero-lateral region. QRS area was calculated from vectorcardiograms that were synthesized from 12-lead ECGs. Acute hemodynamic improvement was assessed as the change in maximum rate of rise of LV-pressure (%ΔLVdP/dtmax). We assessed the effects of endocardial and epicardial LV pacing on the change in QRS area (∆QRS area) and LVdP/dtmax (%ΔLVdP/dtmax). Results A total of 16 patients (age 66 ± 11 years, 56% male, 31% ischemic cardiomyopathy, QRS duration 166±18ms, LBBB in 88%) were included. Endocardial pacing resulted in greater ∆QRS area than epicardial pacing (-51 ± 34 µVs vs. -24 ± 37 µVs, p = 0.021, Panel A). In addition, endocardial pacing led to a larger %ΔLVdP/dtmax as compared to epicardial pacing (21 ± 12% vs. 18 ± 9%, p = 0.025, Panel B). Conclusion Compared to conventional epicardial LV pacing in CRT, endocardial LV pacing results in better electrical resynchronization and acute hemodynamic improvement.

Left ventricular epicardial pacing achieved hyper-responsiveness in young children with dilated cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block.

AimsThe management of heart failure (HF) in young children is challenging. The present study aimed to clarify the effect of left univentricular epicardial pacing on dilated cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block (LBBB) in children.Methods and resultsA total of five cases (30.86 ± 16.39 months, three female) of children weighing 5.8–15 kg with dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB were included in this study. LBBB in one child occurred after device closure of peri‐membranous ventricular septal defects, and the remaining four were idiopathically discovered early after birth. Before implantation, all children suffered from refractory HF and cardiac dilatation; the left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.48 ± 5.84% with Ross Heart Failure Classification III–IV. Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony were observed in all children with QRS duration >140 ms and prolonged septal‐to‐left posterior wall motion delay. Left univentricular epicardial pacing was successfully implanted via left axillary minithoracotomy in the five children. Sensed atrioventricular delays (83 ± 15 ms) were optimized by velocity time integral of aortic blood flow before discharge. During the follow‐up period (10.8 ± 2.68 months), the dilated failing heart was reversed significantly in terms of decreased left ventricular dimension (55.62 ± 3.46 vs. 38.94 ± 3.69 mm, P = 0.005), while the left ventricular ejection fraction improved to 60.18 ± 8.78% (P = 0.006).ConclusionsIn young children with low body weight, if HF is caused by or related to LBBB, left ventricular epicardial pacing still has an excellent effect.

Endocardial pacing is not haemodynamically superior to trans-coronary sinus epicardial pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Endo-Epi CRT study

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Medtronic Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) conventionally involves trans-coronary sinus, epicardial left ventricular (LV) pacing. Some studies have suggested that endocardial LV pacing may be superior to epicardial LV pacing. Objectives To compare the acute haemodynamic effects of CRT when delivered from endocardial (Endo-CRT) and epicardial LV stimulation sites (Epi-CRT). Methods and results Sixteen CRT recipients (aged 70.4 ± 10.1 years [mean ± SD], 62.5% male, QRS: 156.5 ± 16.1 ms, LBBB in 13 [81.3%]) in sinus rhythm underwent intra-procedural measurements of the rate of rise of LV pressure (dP/dtmax) during Endo- and Epi-CRT (RADI pressure wire). Epi-CRT was delivered in basal, mid and apical positions. The Endo-CRT pacing site was chosen using iterative, biplane fluoroscopic views, to target the same position as the Epi-CRT site on the endocardium (see Figure A). Compared to AAI pacing (10 beats per minute above intrinsic rate), both Endo-CRT and Epi-CRT led to an increase in LV dP/dtmax (6.52 ± 8.90% and 6.15 ± 7.97% respectively, both p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the change in LV dP/dtmax (ΔLV dP/dtmax) between Endo-CRT and Epi-CRT at basal (p = 0.54), mid (p = 0.78) or apical LV stimulation sites (p = 0.12) [Figure B]. Conclusions Endo-CRT is not haemodynamically superior to Epi-CRT. Abstract Figure.

Left Ventricular Enlargement, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Efficacy, and Impact of MultiPoint Pacing.

Left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing results in slowly propagating paced wavefronts. We postulated that this effect might limit cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy in patients with LV enlargement using conventional biventricular pacing with single-site LV pacing, but be mitigated by LV stimulation from 2 widely spaced sites using MultiPoint pacing with wide anatomic separation (MPP-AS: ≥30 mm). We tested this hypothesis in the multicenter randomized MPP investigational device exemption trial. Following implant, quadripolar biventricular single-site pacing was activated in all patients (n=506). From 3 to 9 months postimplant, among patients with available baseline LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measures, 188 received biventricular single-site pacing and 43 received MPP-AS. Patients were dichotomized by median baseline LVEDV indexed to height (LVEDVIMedian). Outcomes were measured by the clinical composite score (primary efficacy end point), quality of life, LV structural remodeling (↑EF >5% and ↓ESV 10%) and heart failure event/cardiovascular death. LVEDVIMedian was 1.1 mL/cm. Baseline characteristics differed in patients with LVEDVI>Median versus LVEDVI≤Median. Among patients with LVEDVI>Median, biventricular single-site pacing was less efficacious compared to patients with LVEDVI≤Median (clinical composite score, 65% versus 79%). In contrast, MPP-AS programming generated greater clinical composite score response (92% versus 65%, P=0.023) and improved quality of life (-31.0±29.7 versus -15.7±22.1, P=0.038) versus biventricular single-site pacing in patients with LVEDVI>Median. Reverse remodeling trended better with MPP-AS programming. In patients with LVEDVI>Median, heart failure event rate increased following the 3-month randomization point with biventricular single-site pacing (0.0150±0.1725 in LVEDVI>Median versus -0.0190±0.0808 in LVEDVI ≤Median, P=0.012), but no heart failure event occurred in patients with MPP-AS programming between 3 and 9 months in LVEDVI>Median. All measured outcomes did not differ in patients receiving MPP-AS and biventricular single-site pacing with LVEDVI≤Median. Conventional biventricular single-site pacing, even with a quadripolar lead, has reduced efficacy in patients with LV enlargement. However, the greatest response rate in patients with larger hearts was observed when programmed to MPP-AS pacing.

A Hybrid Procedure Combining Mini-Thoracotomy with Interventional Endocardial Lead Implantation for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure: A Report of Four Cases

We describe the application and effectiveness of transthoracic electrode implantation for epicardial left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with chronic congestive heart failure. We assessed four patients with chronic congestive heart failure for whom implantation of endocardial electrodes was contraindicated. The epicardial electrodes were implanted via a mini-thoracotomy in the fourth or fifth left intercostal space. We analyzed the surgical implantation technique and the short-term effectiveness of the procedure. The epicardial electrodes successfully were implanted in all four patients. The patients' hemodynamic status, cardiac function, and symptoms significantly improved. Patients I, II, III, and IV were discharged from the hospital on the 8, 11, 4, and 7 days, respectively, after the operation. Follow up lasted for 12 months. None of the patients presented with electrode fractures or surgical wound infections, and the pacing threshold and electrode impedance were normal. In one case, phrenic nerve stimulation occurred due to the low placement position of the electrode. When the electrode was moved slightly inward and upward, the sacral nerve stimulation sign disappeared, and no other complications were noted. One patient developed capsule infection, and the presence of an ectopic pacemaker was noted; therefore, a pacemaker replacement procedure was required. In CRT, the implantation of a left ventricular epicardial electrode through a left-sided small incision is safe, feasible, and effective. This hybrid surgery combining interventional and cardiac techniques can maximize the curative effect of CRT.

Left ventricular endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than conventional epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar

BackgroundEpicardial pacing increases risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when pacing in proximity to scar. Endocardial pacing may be less arrhythmogenic as it preserves the physiological sequences of activation and repolarization.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the relative arrhythmogenic risk of endocardial compared to epicardial pacing, and the role of the transmural gradient of action potential duration (APD) and pacing location relative to scar on arrhythmogenic risk during endocardial pacing.MethodsComputational models of ICM patients (n = 24) were used to simulate left ventricular (LV) epicardial and endocardial pacing 0.2–3.5 cm from a scar. Mechanisms were investigated in idealized models of the ventricular wall and scar. Simulations were run with/without a 20-ms transmural APD gradient in the physiological direction and with the gradient inverted. Dispersion of repolarization was computed as a surrogate of VT risk.ResultsPatient-specific models with a physiological APD gradient predict that endocardial pacing decreases VT risk (34%; P <.05) compared to epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar (0.2 cm). Endocardial pacing location does not significantly affect VT risk, but epicardial pacing at 0.2 cm compared to 3.5 cm from scar increases it (P <.05). Inverting the transmural APD gradient reverses this trend. Idealized models predict that propagation in the direction opposite to APD gradient decreases VT risk.ConclusionEndocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than epicardial pacing when pacing proximal to scar and is less susceptible to pacing location relative to scar. The physiological repolarization sequence during endocardial pacing mechanistically explains reduced VT risk compared to epicardial pacing.

Feasibility of RA-LV pacing in patients with symptomatic left bundle branch block: a pilot study.

Several studies have reported the adverse effects of right ventricular apical pacing. Permanent His bundle pacing is proved to be the most physiological. But it can be technically difficult sometimes. One recent large multicenter randomized trial showed that pacing from left ventricular apex or mid-lateral wall has the greatest potential to prevent pacing-induced reduction of cardiac pump function (by maintaining left ventricular mechanical synchrony) and, therefore, can be considered as physiological site. In our study, we have wanted to see the outcome of left ventricular pacing through coronary sinus branch with active fixation bipolar lead as a routine pacing technique in patients with symptomatic left bundle branch block. In our study we have recruited 27patients for left ventricular pacing through coronary sinus branch (as done in cardiac resynchronization therapy) with active fixation bipolar lead and 33 patients for right ventricular apical pacing (control) and compared left ventricular pacing with right ventricular apical pacing in patients with history of syncope with left bundle branch block in baseline electrocardiography who presented with atrio-ventricular block or prolonged HV interval (≥ 70ms) on electrophysiology study in term of procedure and fluoroscopy time and short-term lead performance and left ventricular function. The results of our study showed that left ventricular pacing through a tributary of coronary sinus is associated with shortened QRS duration (21.10 ± 3.92ms) and better LV function (higher left ventricular ejection fraction 64.00 ± 3.03 vs. 59.73 ± 6.73 and lower left ventricular diastolic internal diameter 4.58 ± 0.32 vs. 5.23 ± 0.40cm) in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing. However, the total procedure time and fluoroscopy time was significantly higher (73.75 ± 11.02 vs. 63.32 ± 6.06min and 7.08 ± 1.48 vs. 5.02 ± 1.39min, respectively) in left ventricular pacing group. The results of this study indicate that transvenous left ventricular epicardial pacing may be an option for physiological pacing in patients with symptomatic left bundle branch block.

Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis

BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) increases the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when the left ventricular (LV) epicardial lead is implanted in proximity to scar.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms underpinning this risk by investigating the effects of pacing on local electrophysiology (EP) in relation to scar that provides a substrate for VT in ICM patients undergoing CRT.MethodsImaging data from ICM patients (n = 24) undergoing CRT were used to create patient-specific LV anatomic computational models including scar morphology. Simulations of LV epicardial pacing at 0.2–4.5 cm from the scar were performed using EP models of chronic infarct and heart failure (HF). Dispersion of repolarization and the vulnerable window were computed as surrogates for VT risk.ResultsSimulations predict that pacing in proximity to scar (0.2 cm) compared to more distant pacing to a scar (4.5 cm) significantly (P <.01) increased dispersion of repolarization in the vicinity of the scar and widened (P <.01) the vulnerable window, increasing the likelihood of unidirectional block. Moreover, slow conduction during HF further increased dispersion (∼194%). Analysis of variance and post hoc tests show significantly (P <.01) reduced repolarization dispersion when pacing ≥3.5 cm from the scar compared to pacing at 0.2 cm.ConclusionIncreased dispersion of repolarization in the vicinity of the scar and widening of the vulnerable window when pacing in proximity to scar provides a mechanistic explanation for VT induction in ICM-CRT with lead placement proximal to scar. Pacing 3.5 cm or more from scar may avoid increasing VT risk in ICM-CRT patients.

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing

It is now well recognized that heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) derive substantial clinical benefits from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and LBBB has become one of the important predictors for CRT response. The conventional tachypacing-induced HF model has several major limitations, including absence of stable LBBB and rapid reversal of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after cessation of pacing. Hence, it is essential to establish an optimal model of chronic HF with isolated LBBB for studying CRT benefits. In the present study, a canine model of asynchronous HF induced by left bundle branch (LBB) ablation and 4 weeks of rapid right ventricular (RV) pacing is established. The RV and right atrial (RA) pacing electrodes via the jugular vein approach, together with an epicardial LV pacing electrode, were implanted for CRT performance. Presented here are the detailed protocols of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation, pacing leads implantation, and rapid pacing strategy. Intracardiac and surface electrograms during operation were also provided for a better understanding of LBB ablation. Two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging and aortic velocity time integral (aVTI) were acquired to validate the chronic stable HF model with LV asynchrony and CRT benefits. By coordinating ventricular activation and contraction, CRT uniformed the LV mechanical work and restored LV pump function, which was followed by reversal of LV dilation. Moreover, the histopathological study revealed a significant restoration of cardiomyocyte diameter and collagen volume fraction (CVF) after CRT performance, indicating a histologic and cellular reverse remodeling elicited by CRT. In this report, we described a feasible and valid method to develop a chronic asynchronous HF model, which was suitable for studying structural and biologic reverse remodeling following CRT.

Surgical placement of left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronisation therapy after failure of percutaneous attempt.

SummaryObjectiveCardiac resynchronisation therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment to improve functional status and prolong survival of patients in advanced chronic heart failure. This study assessed the surgical outcomes of left anterior mini-thoracotomy for the implantation of left ventricular epicardial pacing leads in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.MethodsOur study consisted of 30 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac resynchronisation therapy with a left thoracotomy between November 2010 and April 2012 in our clinic. Postoperative follow up included the assessment of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, electrocardiography and echocardiography.ResultsThere were 22 male and eight female patients with a mean age of 68 ± 5.04 years. All patients were in NYHA class III or IV. Pre-procedure mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 28.1 ± 4.5% and post-procedural ejection fraction improved to 31.7 ± 5.1%. The pre-operative QRS duration changed from 171.7 ± 10.8 to 156.2 ± 4.4 ms after the operation. Also there was a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension from 6.98 ± 0.8 to 6.72 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0 .05), but no change in left ventricular end-systolic dimension and severity of mitral regurgitation. All patients had successful surgical left ventricular lead placement. There was no procedure-related mortality. The mean follow-up time was 40.4 months.ConclusionSurgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement procedure is a safe and effective technique in patients with a failed percutaneous attempt.

Abstract 12227: Early Stimulation of Fast-Conducting Endocardial Tissue Underlies Improvements in Endocardial Pacing

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered via left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) is associated with improved acute haemodynamic response compared to LV epicardial pacing (EPI-CRT). The mechanisms underlying this improved response remain controversial. Hypothesis: We used computational electrophysiological models to test the hypotheses that the following ordered cardiac properties are advantageous to ENDO-CRT: fast endocardial conduction (FEC), inherent geometry, asymmetric transmural conduction, and tissue anisotropy. Methods: Cardiac activation was simulated using the mono-domain tissue excitation model in 2D canine and human, and 3D canine biventricular models. The latest activation times (LATs) for LV endocardial and biventricular epicardial tissue were calculated (LVLAT and TLAT), as well the percentage decrease in LATs for endocardial (en) vs epicardial (ep) LV pacing (defined as %dLV=100*(LVLATep- LVLATen)/LVLATep and %dT=100*( TLATep- TLATen)/TLATep respectively). Results: Normal canine cardiac anatomy is responsible for %dLV and %dT values of 7.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Concentric and eccentric remodelled anatomies resulted in %dT values of 15.6% and 1.3%, respectively. The 3D biventricular paced canine model resulted in %dLV and %dT values of -7.1% and 1.5%, in contrast to the experimental observations of 16% and 11%, respectively. Adding FEC to this model altered %dLV and %dT to 13.1% and 10.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results provide a physiological explanation for improved response to ENDO-CRT. We predict that patients with viable fast-conducting endocardial tissue and/or distal Purkinje network, as well as concentric remodelling, are more likely to benefit from reduced ATs and increased synchrony arising from endocardial pacing.

Beneficial Effect on Cardiac Resynchronization From Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing Is Mediated by Early Access to High Conduction Velocity Tissue: Electrophysiological Simulation Study.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered via left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) is associated with improved acute hemodynamic response compared with LV epicardial pacing (EPI-CRT). The role of cardiac anatomy and physiology in this improved response remains controversial. We used computational electrophysiological models to quantify the role of cardiac geometry, tissue anisotropy, and the presence of fast endocardial conduction on myocardial activation during ENDO-CRT and EPI-CRT. Cardiac activation was simulated using the monodomain tissue excitation model in 2-dimensional (2D) canine and human and 3D canine biventricular models. The latest activation times (LATs) for LV endocardial and biventricular epicardial tissue were calculated (LVLAT and TLAT), as well the percentage decrease in LATs for endocardial (en) versus epicardial (ep) LV pacing (defined as %dLV=100×(LVLATep-LVLATen)/LVLATep and %dT=100×(TLATep-TLATen)/TLATep, respectively). Normal canine cardiac anatomy is responsible for %dLV and %dT values of 7.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Concentric and eccentric remodeled anatomies resulted in %dT values of 15.6% and 1.3%, respectively. The 3D biventricular-paced canine model resulted in %dLV and %dT values of -7.1% and 1.5%, in contrast to the experimental observations of 16% and 11%, respectively. Adding fast endocardial conduction to this model altered %dLV and %dT to 13.1% and 10.1%, respectively. Our results provide a physiological explanation for improved response to ENDO-CRT. We predict that patients with viable fast-conducting endocardial tissue or distal Purkinje network or both, as well as concentric remodeling, are more likely to benefit from reduced ATs and increased synchrony arising from endocardial pacing.

Four years follow-up of epicardial left ventricular pacing by mini-thoracotomy for cardiac resynchronisation therapy in congestive heart failure (four cases).

To establish whether left ventricular (LV) pacing by mini-thoracotomy is a safe and feasible procedure after failed transvenous cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), we described four cases of patients who demonstrated congestive heart failure (CHF), had transvenous LV lead implantation failures, and underwent a mini-left-lateral thoracotomy and implantation of an epicardial LV lead. After a mean follow-up 45 ± 3.5 months, the haemodynamic benefits of CRT were apparent in four patients. Mean LV ejection fraction increased from 28.4 ± 6.5% to 44.5 ± 13.7% (p = 0.024), in association with a reduction of LV end-systolic diameters from 62.3 ± 10.3 mm to 53.0 ± 13.11 mm (p = 0.029). QRS width decreased from 162.5 ± 23.6 ms to 147.5 ± 18.9 ms (p = 0.014). New York Heart Association values significantly improved before and after the procedure. These results suggest that epicardial LV pacing by mini-thoracotomy for CRT in CHF is feasible and can bring satisfactory long-term results.

Immediate electrical storm of Torsades de Pointes after CRT-D implantation in an ischemic cardiomyopathy patient

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) is the preferred treatment for patients with severe heart failure, dyssynchrony, and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death or for primary ventricular arrhythmia survivors. Rarely, left ventricular epicardial pacing can induce ventricular tachyarrhythmia rather than a beneficial effect. We describe an ischemic cardiomyopathy patient who underwent CRT-D therapy and developed sustained torsades de pointes (TdP) immediately after switching to biventricular pacing (BVP) mode. Here, TdP possibly developed owing to the change in the dispersion of repolarization of the left ventricle myocardium. The diagnosis and management of BVP-induced ventricular arrhythmia is discussed.

Effects of Different Ventricular Pacing Modes on Ventricular Repolarisation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: A Single-centre Study

The aims of this study were to compare ventricular repolarisation parameters in patients who underwent cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) at Sun Yat-sen University Memorial Hospital under different ventricular pacing modes and to understand effects of epicardial pacing on ventricular repolarisation. The study included 55 patients who underwent CRT. During follow-up outpatient visits three months after CRT implantation, the CRT devices were programmed to deliver no pacing (with the exception of patients with third-degree atrioventricular block), biventricular pacing (BivP), right ventricular endocardial pacing (RV-EndoP), and left ventricular epicardial pacing (LV-EpiP). Signals from the standard 12-lead ECG were recorded simultaneously to measure the QT interval, JT interval, and Tp-e interval, from which the heart rate-corrected QTc interval, JTc interval, and Tp-ec interval were determined. The JTc interval and Tp-ec interval were prolonged during LV-EpiP and BivP compared with those during spontaneous cardiac rhythm and RV-EndoP. The JTc dispersion and Tp-ec dispersion were not significantly different among the four pacing modes. Epicardial pacing prolongs myocardial repolarisation time and increases transmural dispersion of repolarisation. Epicardial pacing has no significant effect on the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarisation.

Atrioventricular Left Ventricular Apical Pacing Improves Haemodynamic, Rotational, and Deformation Variables in Comparison to Pacing at the Lateral Wall in Intact Myocardium: Experimental Study

Aim. To assess the effect on left ventricular (LV) function of atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular pacing at the LV apical or lateral wall and to compare the normal torsional and deformation pattern of the intact LV myocardium with those created by the aforementioned LV pacing modes and sites. Methods. Experiments were conducted in pigs (n = 21) with normal LV function to investigate the acute hemodynamic effects of epicardial AV and ventricular LV pacing at the LV apical or lateral wall. Torsional and deformation indices of LV function were assessed using speckle tracking echocardiography. Results. AV pacing at the apex revealed a significant reduction in the radial strain of the base (P < 0.03), without affecting significantly the ejection fraction and the LV torsion or twist. In contrast, AV pacing at the lateral wall produced, in addition to the reduction of the radial strain of the base (P < 0.01), significant reduction of the circumferential and the radial strain of the apex (both P < 0.01) as well as of the ejection fraction (P < 0.002) and twist (P < 0.05). Conclusions. In pig hearts with intact myocardium, LV function is maintained at sinus rhythm level when AV pacing is performed at the LV apex.

Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart

Multisite left ventricular (multi-LV) epicardial pacing has been proposed as an alternative to conventional single-site LV (single-LV) pacing to increase the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy. To compare the effects of multi-LV versus single-LV pacing in dogs with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Studies were performed in 9 anaesthetized dogs with chronic LBBB using 7 LV epicardial electrodes. Each electrode was tested alone and in combination with 1, 2, 3, and 6 other electrodes, the sequence of which was chosen on the basis of practical real-time electrical mapping to determine the site of the latest activation. LV total activation time (LVTAT) and dispersion of repolarization (DRep) were measured by using approximately 100 electrodes around the ventricles. LV contractility was assessed as the maximum derivative of left ventricular pressure (LVdP/dtmax ). Single-LV pacing provided, on average, a -4.0% ± 9.3% change in LVTAT and 0.2% ± 13.7% change in DRep. Multi-LV pacing markedly decreased both LVTAT and DRep in a stepwise fashion to reach -41.3% ± 5% (P < .001 for overall comparison) and -14.2% ± 19.5% (P < .02 for overall comparison) in the septuple-LV pacing configuration, respectively. Single-LV pacing provided a mean increase of 10.7% ± 7.7% in LVdP/dtmax. LVdP/dtmax incrementally increased by the addition of pacing electrodes to 16.4% ± 8.7% (P < .001 for overall comparison). High response to single-LV pacing could not be improved further during multi-LV pacing. Compared with single-LV pacing, multi-LV pacing can considerably reduce both LVTAT and DRep in dogs with LBBB, but the improvement in contractility is limited to conditions where single-LV pacing provides suboptimal improvement. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these acute effects translate in antiarrhythmic properties and better long-term outcomes.