Left Subclavian Artery Fenestration Research Articles

Comparison of total percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture and chimney technique for left subclavian artery fenestration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.

To compare the outcomes of totally percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture for left subclavian artery (LSA) fenestration (ISMF) and chimney technique in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Data on patients who underwent either chimney-TEVAR (n = 89) or ISMF-TEVAR (n = 113) from October 2018 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were mortality and major complications at 30 days and during follow-up. The technical success rate was 84.3% in the chimney group and 93.8% in the ISMF group (p = 0.027). The incidence of immediate endoleakage was significantly higher in the chimney than ISMF group (15.7% vs 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.027). The 1- and 3-year survival rates in the chimney and ISMF groups were 98.9% ± 1.1% vs 98.1% ± 0.9% and 86.5% ± 6.3% vs 92.6% ± 4.1%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.715). The 3-year rate of cumulative freedom from branch occlusion in the chimney and ISMF group was 95.4% ± 2.3% vs 100%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Both ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR achieved satisfactory short- and mid-term outcomes for the preservation of the LSA in patients with TBAD. ISMF-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes with higher patency and lower reintervention rates. However, ISMF-TEVAR had longer operation times with higher procedure expenses. When LSA revascularization is required during TEVAR, in situ, fenestration, and chimney techniques are all safe and effective methods; in situ, fenestration-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes, but takes longer and is more complicated. LSA revascularization during TEVAR reduces post-operative complication rates. Both in situ ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR are safe and effective techniques for the preservation of the LSA during TEVAR. The chimney technique is associated with a higher incidence of endoleakage and branch occlusion, but ISMF-TEVAR is a more complicated and expensive technique.

Zone 2 Aortic Arch Repair With Single-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts, at Least 3 Years of Follow-up.

The aim of this study is to report the efficiency and safety of single-fenestrated physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) in zone 2 aortic arch pathologies with at least 3 years of follow-up. All consecutive patients with a pathological aortic arch who underwent aortic repair combined with homemade single-fenestrated stent-graft from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed. The patients with a target vessel different from the left subclavian artery (LSA) were excluded. A total of 63 patients were treated for a pathological arch in zone 2 with a single-fenestrated PMEG. 73% were male, and the mean age was 65 years old. 25% were treated for a degenerative aneurysm, 19% for a post dissection aneurysm and 24% for an acute type B dissection. 52% of the patients were treated as an emergency and half of those for an aortic rupture. The LSA fenestration was stented in 70%. During 30 days of follow-up, 2 strokes (3%) were reported, 6 patients (10%) died with 4 of those treated for aortic rupture and 1 had a retrograde aortic dissection. During at least 3 years of follow-up (median 49 months), no reintervention was needed for endoleaks, there was no stent fracture or stent migration. No patient died from an aortic cause. Subgroup analysis comparing the endovascular treatment for various aortic pathologies did not find significant differences in death rate or comorbidity including stroke. When comparing emergent and elective aortic repair, operating time was similar (64 vs 65 minutes), and the LSA fenestration was less frequently stented (52%) in the emergency group. There was no difference in stroke frequency. There was a higher rate of death in the emergency group at 30 days of follow-up, but no patient died from aortic cause in the long-term follow-up. Aortic arch repair with single-fenestrated PMEGs for zone 2 pathological arch disease is associated with acceptable early and midterm major morbidity and mortality. It is suitable for emergency situations. Single-fenestrated PMEG for the left subclavian artery is a safe and efficient option in the short and medium term for the treatment of the aortic arch in zone 2 with 98% technical success. It allows for aortic repair and subclavian artery revascularization in a single step for all patients. It is suitable for a range of main pathologies, including degenerative, dissection-related, isthmus rupture, and embolic pathologies. Additionally, it is always available and easily utilized in emergency cases.

Early and midterm outcomes of in situ fenestration via adjustable puncture needle for Ankura aortic stent graft: A single-center experience.

An analysis was conducted to demonstrate early and midterm outcomes of using adjustable puncture needle-based in situ fenestration (ISF) technique for Ankura aortic stent graft to reconstruct the supra-arch branch in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). A retrospective analysis of 68 cases of aortic lesions with insufficient proximal anchoring area admitted to our department from March 2017 to December 2021 was performed. In situ fenestration thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) was performed at the same time during the operation. Among them, there were fifty-eight cases of thoracic aortic dissection, seven cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm, and three cases of thoracic aortic ulcer. Intraoperative adjustable puncture with needle was used for the Ankura aorta stent graft to perform ISF and reconstruction of the supra-arch branch. The success rate of ISF was 94.1% (64/68). Only in four cases, attempts were made to create ISF in the left subclavian artery (LSA), and all the four were unsuccessful because of sharp and tortuosity angle. Among them, forty-four cases were only LSA fenestration, and one case was left common carotid artery (LCCA) fenestration + LSA embolism. LSA + left vertebral artery (LVA) fenestration was performed in two cases, LSA fenestration +LCCA chimney was performed in fourteen cases, LCCA + LSA fenestration + innominate artery (INA) chimney was performed in one case, and LCCA fenestration + INA chimney + LSA embolism was performed in two cases. The overall neurologic event rate was 3.1% (spinal cord ischemia 0, with stroke observed in two cases). Postoperatively, one patient (1.6%) died on the third day after TEVAR due to the retrograde dissections. There were four cases of endoleak (6.3%; three type I and one type II). The average follow-up was 29.2 ± 14.4months, and no patient died during the follow-up period. Three cases of endoleak disappeared, and one case did not increase further. In addition, other two cases of retrograde dissections were observed at 3 and 5months after TEVAR. Fortunately, they were scheduled for emergency surgery with ascending aorta replacement and improved well. There was only one case of LSA occlusion after ISF which was reconstructed by endovascular treatment. Two patients were found with distal stent graft-induced new entries (dSINE), and TEVAR was performed again during the follow-up period. Early and midterm outcomes demonstrated that ISF via the adjustable puncture needle device for the Ankura aorta stent graft is a feasible and effective treatment method, which can achieve high technical success and satisfactory short-term results.

Physician–Modified Endovascular Graft for Left Subclavian Artery Fenestration during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of physician-modified endovascular graft for preservation of left subclavian artery during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. From June 2019 to October 2022, 66 patients with a variety of thoracic aortic pathologies were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair using physician-modified endovascular graft left subclavian artery fenestration to achieve adequate proximal landing zone. The details of surgical techniques were described. The perioperative morbidity, mortality, and the outcomes of mid-term follow-up were analyzed. Of the 66 patients (men: women, 53:13; age, 55.18 [55.18±10.62] years), 53 (80.30%) presented with type B aortic dissection, 10 (15.15%) with thoracic penetrating aortic ulcer, 2 (3.03%) with thoracic aortic aneurysm, and 1 (1.52%) with left subclavian artery aneurysm. All of them underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair using physician-modified endovascular graft left subclavian artery fenestration on the sterile back table. The technique success rate was 96.97% (n=64). Total operation time was 92min (interquartile range, 86-118), graft modification time was 19min (interquartile range, 17-21), fluoroscopy time was 49min (interquartile range, 41-62), and contrast agent dosage was 165mL (interquartile range, 155-185). 30-day perioperative morbidities were 3 (4.55%) strokes, 1 (1.52%) retrograde type A aortic dissection, 1 (1.52%) aortic intimal intussusception, 1 (1.52%) left arm ischemia, and 3 (4.55%) type Ia endoleaks. Postoperative 30-day mortality and reintervention rates were 1.52% and 4.55%, respectively. Among the 63 patients included in the follow-up of 17months (interquartile range, 7.75-18.25), the primary patency of left subclavian artery fenestration stents was 100%. Late complications were 1 (1.59%) distal stent graft-induced new entry and 1 (1.59%) death due to retrograde type A aortic dissection during the follow-up. The stent graft-induced new entry patient was observed with stable false lumen. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with physician-modified endovascular graft for left subclavian artery revascularization is a safe, feasible, and efficacious technique associated with high success rate. Further study is needed for long-term outcome investigation.

Homemade fenestrated physician-modified stent grafts for arch aortic degenerative aneurysms.

We evaluated the early- and medium-term outcomes of single- and double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total endovascular degenerative aortic arch aneurysm repair. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 52 patients from August 2013 through January 2021 who had undergone homemade fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair for degenerative aortic aneurysms. In all cases, a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA) was fashioned and was the only one stented. For a double-fenestrated endograft, a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated both the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery was added. A total of 52 patients with degenerative aortic arch aneurysms were treated. Of the 52 patients, 36 were men, the mean age was 75± 8years, 31% had received a single LSA fenestration, and 69% had undergone double-fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Of the 52 procedures, 5 (10%) were emergent procedures. The technical success was 100%. The median time required for stent graft modification was 22± 6minutes. The 30-day mortality was 2% (n= 1). Five patients (10%) had experienced a cerebrovascular event, including two transient ischemic attacks, one minor stroke with full neurologic recovery, and two with sequelae. Two patients (4%) had experienced perioperative retrograde dissection during follow-up. No patient had developed a type I, II, or III endoleak from the LSA. No patient had required reintervention. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. During a mean follow-up of 18± 11months, no patient had required conversion to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, or paraplegia. Single or double PMEG is a safe and suitable tool for the treatment of high morbidity pathology such as aortic arch degenerative aneurysm repair. In addition, this device can be used in patients requiring elective or emergency repair.

Total Arch Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Double Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts: 100 Patients

Objective: The aim was to evaluate early and medium-term outcomes of double fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected data included 100 patients, from January 2017 to December 2021, undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 0. The fenestrations were a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated the brach2iocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Only the LSA fenestration was stented. Results: The median duration for stent-graft modification was 23±6 minutes. Of the 100 patients, 70 were men. The mean patient age was 70±10.5 years. Indications for treatment included degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n=32), dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after type A dissections (n=23) and (n=19) after type B dissections, acute complicated type B dissection (n=16), and other pathologies (n=10). Technical success rate was 97%. The 30 day mortality was 2% (n=2). Four patients (4%) had minor stroke with full recovery. One patient (1%) had a type IA endoleak, 1 patient (1%) had a type IB endoleak, and 2 patients (2%) have a type II endoleak from the LSA. Eight patients (8%) required reintervention: 1 type IA endoleak, 1 type IB endoleak, 1 retrograde type A dissection, and 5 because of access-related complications. During a mean follow-up of 24±7.2 months, there were no aortic rupture, paraplegia, and all supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusions: Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is both feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair avoiding the need for anatomical and extra-anatomical surgical revascularization. The long-term durability will need to be assessed in studies with long-term follow-up. Clinical Impact Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair avoiding the need for anatomical and extra-anatomical surgical revascularization. The standout feature of this double fenestrated device is its simple handling during operation with the proximal fenestrations being directed to the orifices of the BT and LCCA automatically when the LSA fenestration is catheterized and secured by covered stent placement. The deployment algorithm actively steers the operator away from superfluous manipulations of the device within the arch and avoids guidewire manipulation in carotid arteries. The long-term durability will need to be assessed in studies with long-term follow-up.

Clinical Validation of the Impact of Branch Stent Extension on Hemodynamics in ISF-TEVAR Involving LSA Reconstruction.

BackgroundThe study of hemodynamics regarding thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is helpful to improve the surgical efficacy.ObjectiveCorrelations between hemodynamic changes and branch stent extension length and interference factors for branch stent extension length of in situ fenestration TEVAR (ISF-TEVAR) involving the left subclavian artery (LSA) were evaluated.Materials and MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 196 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection who received in situ laser fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair with LSA fenestration from April 2014 to March 2021. Branch stent extension to the main stent graft was evaluated by the computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Hemodynamic change of LSA was defined as a 20 mmHg interbrachial systolic pressure difference. The factors affecting the extension of the branch stent were also evaluated.ResultsAll patients underwent ISF-TEVAR with LSA fenestration, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up. The mean length of the branch stent extension was 10.37 ± 0.34 mm, which was used to divide the patients into long and short groups. Asymptomatic hemodynamic changes (defined as a 20 mmHg interbrachial systolic pressure difference) in LSA were observed in 61 patients undergoing ISF-TEVAR involving LSA fenestration. The Spearman correlation analysis showed extension length of a branch stent >1.5 cm elevated the risk of hemodynamic changes.ConclusionOverall, we conclude that branch stent extension length >1.5 cm induced LSA hemodynamic changes. Appropriate shortening of the stent extension length can improve the curative effect of ISF-TEVAR, especially when faced with a type II/III aortic arch and stent angles of <30 degrees.

Endovascular Treatments for Coarctation of the Aorta with Concurrent Poststenotic Aneurysms in Adults

Coarctation of the aorta with poststenotic aneurysms is rare and complex. Here we report a relatively large group of endovascular treatments for the disease. Fifteen patients from two centers between 2006 and 2019 were included in the study. The patients were retrospectively divided into two groups. Patients in the complex group had insufficient proximal landing zone (<2cm) or the zigzag shape of aorta. Their demographics, clinical manifestations, endovascular procedures, and follow-up results were analyzed. There were 7 patients in the simple group and 8 patients in the complex group. Eleven patients were symptomatic. Despite the unfavorable anatomy in the complex group, technical success reached 100%. The diameter of coarctation increased from 8.6mm to 16.7mm with poststenotic aneurysms successfully excluded at the same time. In patients without sufficient proximal landing zone, left subclavian artery was covered by the stent grafts and then sacrificed (three patients) or revascularized (four patients). Other than one patient who suffered iliac artery rupture and received open repair, there was no other perioperative complications. Computed tomography angiography repeated at mean 42months postoperation confirmed patency of stents and the exclusion of aneurysms with no aortic wall injury. Mild endoleaks occurred in two patients in the complex group and were left to observation. During 55.0months follow-up, except for one patient who received secondary left subclavian artery fenestration, all other patients remained asymptomatic. Endovascular treatments for coarctation of the aorta with poststenotic aneurysm showed a high technical success and could be an alternative solution for such disease.

Percutaneous In Situ Microneedle Puncture Fenestration via the Left Subclavian Artery for branched Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

This study explored the feasibility of a totally percutaneous approach to perform in situ microneedle puncture fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) via access from the left subclavian artery (LSA). In total, 23 patients with either thoracic aortic dissection or thoracic aortic aneurysm were treated with in situ LSA fenestration during TEVAR. The procedure was technically successful in all the patients. No serious complications occurred during a mean 9-month follow-up period. In situ microneedle puncture fenestration during TEVAR via the LSA is a feasible and effective method for LSA reconstruction.

Endovascular aortic arch repair with a pre-cannulated double-fenestrated physician-modified stent graft: a benchtop experiment.

The critical step in total endovascular aortic arch repair is to ensure alignment of fenestrations with, and thus maintenance of flow to, supra-aortic trunks. This experimental study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of a double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular graft [single common large fenestration for the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal small fenestration for left subclavian artery (LSA) with a preloaded guidewire for the LSA] for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Eight fresh human cadaveric thoracic aortas were harvested. Thoracic endografts with a physician-modified double fenestration were deployed for total endovascular aortic arch repair in a bench test model. A guidewire was preloaded through the distal fenestration for the LSA. All experiments were undertaken in a hybrid room under fluoroscopic guidance with subsequent angioscopy and open evaluation for assessment. Mean aortic diameter in zone 0 was 31.3 ± 3.33 mm. Mean duration for stent graft modification was 20.1 ± 5.8 min. Mean duration of the procedure was 24 ± 8.6 min. The Medtronic Valiant Captivia stent graft was used in 6 and the Cook Alpha Zenith thoracic stent graft in 2 cases. LSA catheterization was technically successful with supra-aortic trunk patency in 100% of cases. The use of a double-fenestrated stent graft with a preloaded guidewire appears to be a useful technical addition to facilitate easy and correct alignment of stent graft fenestrations with supra-aortic trunk origins.

Double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts for total aortic arch repair in 50 patients

ObjectiveOur aim was to evaluate the early- and medium-term outcomes of using double fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total endovascular aortic arch repair. MethodsThe present single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 50 patients from January 2017 through October 2019, who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The fenestrations were a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Only the LSA fenestration was stented. ResultsThe median duration for stent graft modification was 26 ± 6 minutes. Of the 50 patients, 41 were men. The mean patient age was 68 ± 11.5 years. The indications for treatment included degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n = 17), dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after type A dissection (n = 13), type B dissection (n = 13), aortic ulcer (n = 3), and other pathologies (n = 4). The technical success rate was 94% (47 of 50) overall, and 100% (28 of 28) after a technical modification incorporating a preloaded guide wire for the LSA fenestration (P < .05). The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1). Two patients (4%) had a minor stroke with full recovery. One patient (2%) had a type IB and two patients (4%) had a type II endoleak from the LSA. Four patients (8%) required reintervention: one because of a type IB endoleak and three because of access-related complications. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 8.3 months, no conversions to open surgical repair were required and no aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection occurred. ConclusionsUsing double fenestrated PMEGs for TEVAR is both feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair, avoiding the need for anatomic and extra-anatomic surgical revascularization. The absence of brachiocephalic trunk stenting was not associated with endoleaks or treatment failure and resulted in a lower stroke risk than alternative strategies. The midterm results suggest that stenting of the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery might not be necessary for a large proportion of patients undergoing total endovascular aortic arch repair. The persistence of the seal and ongoing durability require assessment in studies with long-term follow-up data available.

In Situ Laser Stent Graft Fenestration of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with Limited Proximal Landing Zones: 5-Year Outcomes

PurposeTo assess safety and feasibility of in situ laser stent graft fenestration to revascularize the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with limited proximal landing zones with 5 years of follow-up. Materials and MethodsIn a single-center retrospective study, 130 patients with TBAD with limited proximal landing zones (≤ 1.5 cm) underwent in situ laser stent graft fenestration revascularizing the LSA during TEVAR from April 2014 to April 2019. Outcomes were assessed by CT angiography and clinic visits, including technical success rate, operative time, LSA patency, ischemic events, and late aorta-related complications during follow-up. ResultsMean age of patients was 53 y (range, 33–73 y). Primary technical success rate was 96.9% (126/130). Three chimney stents were placed instead of fenestration, and 1 LSA fenestration was combined with a left common carotid artery (LCCA) chimney stent. Mean operative time was 53 min ± 28 with fluoroscopy time of 40 min ± 15. There were no neurologic complications and no deaths, with a mean duration of hospital stay of 9 d (range, 5–21 d). At a mean follow-up of 42 mo (range, 5–60 mo), there was a 97% primary LSA patency. Four patients had a type I endoleak, which disappeared during follow-up. One LCCA became occluded after 6 months. No type II or III endoleaks were found. Retrograde type A aortic dissection and stent graft–induced new distal entry were not found during follow-up. ConclusionsIn situ laser fenestration to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing zones was efficient, safe, and feasible based on 5-year follow-up.

Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16–20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

IF10. In Situ Laser Stent Graft Fenestration of the Left Subclavian Artery for Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection

Aim to assess the security and feasibility of in situ laser stent graft fenestration to reserve left subclavian artery (LSA) for thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with limited proximal landing regions. From April 2014 to July 2018, 130 successive patients under in situ laser stent graft fenestration constructing LSA during TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing regions were analyzed by means of retrospective analysis. Preoperative, together with intraoperative and postoperative medical data were recorded. The mean age of patients was 53 years old (range, 33-73 years), and 76 of 130 patients (58.5%) were male. Single LSA fenestration was formed in 126 patients; thus, the first technological achievement rate was nearly 96.9% (126 of 130 patients). In addition, one LSA fenestration was united with left common carotid artery chimney stent and the other three chimney stents were placed instead of laser fenestration owing to LSA tortuosity. The average operation time was 53 ± 28 minutes and the fluoroscopy duration was 40 ± 15 minutes. Importantly, there were no complexities concerning the preoperative neurologic state and no in-clinic deaths. Additionally, 9 days was the average duration of stay (range, 5-21 days). Patients stayed alive at average 12 months follow-up (range, 3-20 months) with computed tomography angiography showing 97% initial LSA patency. Four patients had type I endoleaks and no fenestration associated with type II or III endoleaks were found. In situ laser fenestration to restore the LSA in TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing regions was efficient, secure, and feasible.

Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection with Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.

To evaluate the early and midterm outcomes of endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA). From November 2012 to July 2018, 15 patients (13 male, 2 female) who had TBAD with ARSA underwent total endovascular repair, including thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), left subclavian artery (LSA) chimney technique, LSA fenestration technique, and double chimney technique (LSA chimney and ARSA periscope). The mean age was 55 years. Kommerell diverticulum (KD) occurred in 2 patients, which were covered by means of oversized aortic stents. All patients had preoperative imaging examinations for assessing cerebral blood flow and the dominant vertebral arteries. All procedures were completed successfully. There was no in-hospital mortality. The mean procedural time was 98 ± 40 minutes (range 50-190). The mean preoperative diameters of the maximum descending aorta, false lumen, and true lumen in the descending aorta versus postoperative were 37 ± 10 mm (range 28-67), 18 ± 9 mm (range 9-41), and 19 ± 6 mm (range 10-35) versus 34 ± 9 mm (range 25-64), 5 ± 8 mm (range 0-28), and 28 ± 5 mm (range 19-37), respectively. Right upper extremity weakness was observed in 2 patients, which recovered gradually during follow-up. Immediate type Ia endoleak was detected in 1 patient. The mean follow-up time was 33 ± 20 months. During follow-up, no ARSA steal syndrome, spinal cord ischemia, or strokes were not observed. Endovascular treatment for TBAD with ARSA was feasible and safe with a satisfactory midterm follow-up outcome.

Double homemade fenestrated stent graft for total endovascular aortic arch repair

ObjectiveThe aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of physician-modified double fenestrated stent grafts for total endovascular aortic arch repair: one proximal large fenestration for the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery and one distal fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). MethodsFrom January 2017 through February 2018, 17 patients (88.2% elective) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with double homemade fenestrated stent graft for total endovascular aortic arch repair to maintain supra-aortic trunk patency. Indications were degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n = 7), dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n = 6), chronic complicated type B aortic dissection (n = 3), and acute complicated type B aortic dissection (n = 1). Routine postoperative follow-up imaging with computed tomography angiography was performed to assess TEVAR and supra-aortic trunks patency and endoleak. ResultsThe median time for stent graft modification was 19 minutes (range, 16-20 minutes). Endovascular exclusion of the aortic arch was achieved in all the cases. One LSA catheterization failed and LSA revascularization was performed by carotid axillary bypass and coverage of the LSA fenestration by additional stent graft placement. Additional planned endovascular procedures were required in three patients: closure of supra-aortic trunks re-entry tears in two cases of dissecting aortic arch aneurysms and one transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe native aortic valve regurgitation. One stroke, with no long-term deficit, was observed. No patients died. All left supra-aortic trunks are patent. No type I endoleak was observed. We only observed one patient with a type II endoleak. During a mean follow up of 7 ± 2 months, there were no conversions to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection. ConclusionsDouble homemade fenestrated TEVAR is both feasible and effective for maintaining the patency of the supra-aortic trunks and allows total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Handmade stent graft fenestration to preserve left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair†.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a handmade fenestrated stent graft over an aortic stent graft for preserving the left subclavian artery (LSA) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). From July 2015 to October 2018, a total of 32 consecutive patients with various thoracic aortic pathologies who underwent TEVAR in which handmade fenestration over a thoracic aortic stent graft was used for LSA were included. Outcomes including technical success, procedure-related complications, perioperative mortality and morbidity and graft patency were analysed. Twenty-four patients (75.00%) presented with aortic dissection, 5 patients (15.63%) with thoracic aortic aneurysm and 2 patients (6.25%) with penetrating aortic ulcer; 1 patient (3.13%) required re-TEVAR due to endoleak and sac expansion from previous TEVAR for thoraco-abdominal aneurysm. TEVAR was performed in a zone 2 landing with single fenestration for LSA (26 patients, 81.25%), zone 1 landing with double fenestration for both LSA and left common carotid artery (5 patients, 15.63%) or zone 1 landing with single fenestration for LSA and a chimney graft for left common carotid artery (1 patient, 3.13%). The technical success rate, defined as the successful alignment of fenestration to LSA, was 93.75%. At a mean follow-up of 17.3 months, 4 cases of endoleak and 2 cases of stent graft-induced new entry were noted, 3 of which were treated endovascularly. Our preliminary results demonstrate the viability of preserving LSA blood flow in TEVAR using a handmade stent graft fenestration to treat various aortic pathologies in various clinical situations and the technical feasibility and short-term results that may justify the use of this method in emergency cases.

Midterm results of laser generated in situ fenestration of the left subclavian artery during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectiveTo analyze the midterm result of in situ fenestration (ISF) of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). MethodsIn this clinical study, between 2014 and 2016, ISF for LSA revascularization was attempted during TEVAR in 10 patients (7 males; median age, 68 years). An excimer laser, placed from the left brachial artery, was used to create a fenestration and all fenestrations were stented with covered stent grafts. Follow-up included computed tomography scans 1 month postoperatively and annually thereafter. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier. ResultsNine of the 10 laser-assisted ISF were successful. No 30-day mortality occurred. One patient had a transient ischemic attacked in the left carotid territory. After a median follow-up of 27 months, all fenestrations were patent. At 1 month, computed tomography follow-up showed nonspecific endoleaks of unknown origin in five of the nine patients. At 27 months follow-up, only two endoleaks remained. One reintervention was done after 24 months owing to a type Ic endoleak from the LSA. Overall TEVAR success, defined as survival with no aneurysm expansion, was eight of nine. One patient showed aneurysm expansion after 14 months. Two deaths occurred (at 33 and 31 months postoperative), one of unknown reason and one aneurysm related. ConclusionsLaser fenestration might be an option for LSA revascularization during emergent or semiurgent TEVAR and electively in patients with hostile neck anatomy (eg, previous neck radiation, short and adipose necks) that might make a carotid–subclavian bypass difficult. The LSA fenestration has excellent patency and TEVAR success was not affected by nonspecific endoleaks around the LSA.

Fenestrated Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Physician Modified Stent Grafts for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection with Unfavourable Landing Zone

The aim was to evaluate the early results of fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (fTEVAR) using physician modified stent grafts (PMSGs) to revascularise aortic branches for acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) with unfavourable proximal landing zone. Twenty consecutive patients who underwent fenestrated TEVAR using PMSGs between November 2015 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative clinical data were recorded. The median patient age was 53 years (range, 18-83 years), and 16 of the 20 (80%) patients were men. Indications were complicated ABAD with unfavourable proximal landing zones, including inadequate proximal landing zone (n=4), retrograde dissection extending to the left subclavian artery (LSA) (n=13), and retrograde haematoma involving the LSA (n=3). Twenty PMSGs (Medtronic Valiant stent grafts, n=4; Relay thoracic stent grafts, n=10; Ankura thoracic stent grafts, n=6) were deployed. One LSA fenestration was created in 19 patients, and one LSA fenestration combined with a left common carotid artery (LCCA) scallop was created in one patient. Branch stents consist of a covered stent for the LSA (n=7), an uncovered stent for the LSA (n=14), and an uncovered stent for the LCCA (n=1). The median duration for stent graft modifications was 40min (range 30-60min). The mean interval between symptom onset and treatment was 5±3 days (range, 1-10 days). The initial technical success rate was 90% (18 of 20). Partial coverage of the LCCA in one patient resolved after uncovered chimney stent implantation in the LCCA. Type III endoleak between the LSA covered stent and the PMSG occurred in this patient 1 week post fTEVAR and resolved after re-intervention with deployment of an Amplatzer occluder device across the site of the leak. A chimney stent was deployed to solve the misalignment of the LSA in another patient. The mean operation time was 101±48min, and fluoroscopy time was 24±16min. There were no in hospital deaths and no peri-operative neurological complications. The median length of stay was 9±6 days (range, 5-26 days). One patient had a left brachial artery (LBA) pseudoaneurysm at the puncture site that required open repair. One patient presented renal deterioration post-operatively and recovered uneventfully after conservative therapy. All patients survived at a mean follow-up of 6.95 months (range, 2-14 months). During follow-up, no post-operative complications occurred and all target vessels remained patent. No fenestration related Type I or III endoleaks were observed. fTEVAR using PMSGs may be a viable alternative for patients who present with ABAD without healthy proximal landing zones and who are unable to wait for a custom made fenestrated device.

Homemade fenestrated stent-graft for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of zone 2 aortic lesions

ObjectiveThe aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of zone 2 aortic lesions. MethodsFrom November 2013 to January 2017, 24 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery revascularization using a homemade fenestrated stent-graft to preserve the patency of the left subclavian artery. Elective cases accounted for 54% (n = 13) of the sample. Indications included acute complicated type B aortic dissection (n = 9), degenerative aneurysm (n = 9), penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 5), and intramural hematoma (n = 1). Routine postoperative follow-up imaging with computed tomography angiography was performed to assess thoracic endovascular aortic repair and left subclavian artery fenestration patency and endoleak. ResultsMedian duration for stent-graft modification was 16 minutes (range, 14-17 minutes). The technical success rate was 100%. One patient had a distal type I endoleak requiring additional stent-graft placement. One patient had partial coverage of the left common carotid artery requiring left common carotid artery stenting. One patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae (4.1%). Overall mortality was 0%. All left subclavian arteries were patent. Two type III endoleaks required additional left subclavian artery covered stent placement. One type II endoleak is currently observed. During a mean follow-up of 13.2 ± 2 months, there were no conversions to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection. ConclusionsThe use of a homemade fenestrated stent-graft for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of zone 2 aortic lesions is both feasible and effective for left subclavian artery revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair involving a spectrum of thoracic aortic pathology. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.