Left-sided Double-lumen Tube Research Articles

A Comparison of Conventional Rotating Method and Non-Rotating Method for Double-Lumen Tube Insertion Using a Customized Rigid J-Shaped Stylet for One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: The conventional double-lumen tube (DLT) insertion method requires a rotatory maneuver that was developed using direct laryngoscopy and may not be optimal for video laryngoscopy. This study compared a new non-rotatory maneuver with the conventional method for DLT insertion using video laryngoscopy. Methods: Patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation were randomly assigned to either the rotating (R) or non-rotating (NR) method groups. All patients were intubated using a customized rigid J-shaped stylet, a video laryngoscope, and a left-sided silicone DLT. The conventional rotatory maneuver was performed in the R group. In the NR group, the stylet was inserted with its tip oriented anteriorly (12 o'clock direction) while maintaining the bronchial lumen towards the left (9 o'clock direction). After reaching the glottic opening, the tube was inserted using a non-rotatory maneuver, maintaining the initial orientation. The primary endpoint was the intubation time. Secondary endpoints included first-trial success rate, sore throat, hoarseness, and airway injury. Results: Ninety patients (forty-five in each group) were included. The intubation time was significantly shorter in the NR group compared to the R group (22.0 [17.0, 30.0] s vs. 28.0 [22.0, 34.0] s, respectively), with a median difference of 6 s (95% confidence interval [CI], 3-11 s; p = 0.017). The NR group had a higher first-attempt success rate and a lower incidence of sore throats. Conclusions: The non-rotatory technique with video laryngoscopy significantly reduced intubation time and improved first-attempt success rate, offering a viable and potentially superior alternative to the conventional rotatory technique.

Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Saber-Sheath Trachea

Saber-sheath trachea is a deformation of the trachea characterized by a tracheal index of less than 0.67, commonly found in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This condition can lead to symptoms such as shortness of breath, coughing, and recurrent respiratory infections, which may necessitate surgical intervention. We present the case of a 72-year-old male with a left upper pulmonary lobe tumor scheduled for thoracoscopic lobectomy. The patient exhibited severe emphysema and had a tracheal index of 0.28, indicating a significantly narrowed intrathoracic trachea. Preoperative assessments revealed stable vital signs and low risk for perioperative complications, allowing for standard noninvasive monitoring during the procedure. Anesthesia was induced while maintaining spontaneous breathing using inhalation anesthetics. A left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube was successfully placed for lung isolation. Throughout the surgery, airway pressures remained below 20 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, and the patient tolerated ventilation well. Following the procedure, fiberoptic bronchoscopy confirmed the absence of airway complications. The patient experienced a smooth recovery, was discharged after 6 days, and reported feeling well at the 3-month follow-up. This case underscores the importance of careful anesthetic management in patients with saber-sheath trachea undergoing thoracic surgery.

The feasibility and accuracy of the method for selecting the optimal size of double-lumen tube in thoracic surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Double-lumen tubes (DLTs) are commonly used for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic surgery and the selection of an optimal size of DLTs is still a humongous task. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of the method for selecting an optimal size of DLTs in thoracic surgery. Sixty adult patients requiring a left side double-lumen tube (LDLT) for elective thoracoscopic surgery were included in this study. All patients were randomly allocated to the following two groups: Cuffs Collapsed group (CC group, n = 30) and Cuffs Inflated group (CI group, n = 30). In the Cuffs Collapsed group, the outer diameter of LDLT (the outer diameter of the tracheal and bronchial cuffs when they were collapsed as the outer diameter of the LDLT) matched with the inner diameter of the trachea and bronchus measured by the anesthesiologist on the chest CT slice; In the Cuffs Inflated group, the outer diameter of LDLT (the outer diameter of the tracheal and bronchial cuffs when they were inflated as the outer diameter of the LDLT) matched with the inner diameter of the trachea and bronchus measured by the anesthesiologist on the chest CT slice. The primary outcomes were the incidences of airway complications postoperative such as hoarseness and sore throat. The time of intubation and alignment, the incidences of LDLT displacement and adjustment, the peak airway pressure, the plateau airway pressure and the end-tidal carbon dioxide were also recorded. The incidences of airway complications postoperative such as sore throat and hoarseness were lower in the CI group than the CC group (P < 0.05), the intubation times was shorter in the CI group than the CC group (P < 0.05), while the peak airway pressure, the plateau airway pressure and the end-tidal carbon dioxide during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation were no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). The method which matched the inner diameter of the trachea and bronchus measured on chest CT slice with the outer diameter of the tracheal and bronchial cuffs when they were inflated to select an appropriate size of LDLT can reduce the incidence of airway complications.Trials registration: Clinical Trials: gov. no. NCT05739318. Registered at https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov 22/02/2023.

Common double-lumen tube selection methods overestimate adequate tube sizes in individual patients – a 3D reconstruction study

BackgroundAppropriate selection of double-lumen tube sizes for one-lung ventilation is crucial to prevent airway damage. Current selection methods rely on demographic factors or 2D radiography. Prediction of left bronchial diameter is indispensable for choosing the adequate tube size. This prospective observational study investigates if current selection methods sufficiently predict individuals’ left bronchial diameters for DLT selection compared to the 3D reconstruction.Methods100 patients necessitating thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation and left-sided double-lumen tubes, ≥ 18 years of age, and a set of chest X-rays and 2D thorax CT scans for 3D reconstruction of the left main bronchus were included between 07/2021 and 06/2023. The cross-validated prediction error and the width of the 95%-prediction intervals of the 3D left main bronchial diameter utilizing linear prediction models were based on current selection methods.ResultsThe mean bronchial diameter in 3D reconstruction was 13.6 ± 2.1 mm. The ranges of the 95%-prediction intervals for the bronchial diameter were 6.4 mm for demographic variables, 8.3 mm for the tracheal diameter from the X-ray, and 5.9 mm for bronchial diameter from the 2D-CT scans. Current methods violated the suggested ‘≥1 mm’ safety criterion in up to 7% (men) and 42% (women). Particularly, 2D radiography overestimated women’s left bronchial diameter. Current methods even allowed the selection of double-lumen tubes with bronchial tube sections greater than the bronchial diameter in women.ConclusionsNeither demographic nor 2D-radiographic methods sufficiently account for the variability of the bronchial diameter. Wide 95%-prediction intervals for the bronchial diameter hamper accurate individual double-lumen tube selection. This increases women’s risk of bronchial damage, particularly if they have other predisposing factors. These patients may benefit from 3D reconstruction of the left main bronchus.Trial registrationNot applicable.

Anesthetic Management of Bronchobiliary Fistula as a Complication of Liver Hydatid Cyst: A Case Report.

Bronchobiliary fistula (BBF) in adults is a quite infrequent complication characterized by the abnormal interconnection between the right bronchial system and the biliary tract. BBF may occur due to various causes, including trauma, infections, malignancies, and complications of certain surgical procedures involving the liver or the hepatobiliary system. In this paper, we report a case of BBF following liver hydatid cyst resection that developed in a 58-year-old Iranian male. The patient had acute dyspnea with yellowish sputum. After diagnostic measures such as bronchoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and confirmation of the diagnosis of BBF, the patient underwent Intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, placement of pleural drain, sphincterotomy and CBD stents insertion but unfortunately, these measures were not effective and the patient was a candidate for thoracotomy and resection of fistula and the involved lung. During surgery, absolute lung isolation was done by insertion of a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube and uneventful anesthesia was maintained for about 5 hours. Patients with BBF present unique challenges in terms of anesthetic management. Sepsis, pulmonary impairment, electrolyte imbalances and malnutrition will make anesthesiologists face many perioperative challenges. During surgery, absolute lung isolation is typically necessary and achieving effective lung isolation can be quite challenging due to the presence of the fistula. Postoperatively, intensive respiratory support, chest tube drainage, and appropriate antibiotic therapy may be required .In addition, a multidisciplinary approach involving anesthesiologists, thoracic surgeons, and other specialists is crucial.

Expert opinion on the use of fiberoptic bronchospe to check the insertion depth of the left-sided double-lumen tube.

Left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT) is commonly used to achieve one lung isolation in most thoracic surgical procedures. Traditionally, the LDLT is blindly placed using direct or video laryngoscopy. In this brief report, we highlight the importance of using our novel insertion depth formula to predict the appropriate LDLT insertion depth and demonstrate the current evidence supporting the efficacy of the formula. Also, we will discuss two relatively new devices of LDLTs: one with an embedded camera at the distal end of the tracheal lumen and the other with a carinal cuff between the bronchial cuff and the tracheal lumen in reducing the incidence of too deep inserted LDLT. We advocate that using our novel formula and these two new devices may reduce but not eliminate the need for FOB to check the insertion depth of LDLT.

Utilization of an Endobronchial Blocker Through a Double-Lumen Tube as Rescue for Inadequate One-Lung Ventilation.

Failure to provide one-lung ventilation can prohibit minimally invasive thoracic surgeries. Strategies for one-lung ventilation include double-lumen endotracheal tubes or endobronchial blockers, but rarely both. Inability to provide lung isolation after double-lumen endotracheal tube placement requires troubleshooting and sometimes the use of extra equipment. This case describes using a unique Y-shaped endobronchial blocker placed through a left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube after failure to achieve lung isolation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube alone.

A Clinical Comparison of 2 Bronchial Blockers Versus Double-Lumen Tubes for One-Lung Ventilation

To compare the quality of lung collapse, time, and number of attempts required to achieve lung isolation, and incidence of intraoperative malpositioning between the EZ blocker (EZB), Fuji Uniblocker (UB), and the left-sided double lumen tube (DLT). Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Single tertiary-level, university-affiliated hospital. Eighty-nine patients undergoing elective open thoracotomies or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The 89 patients were randomized to receive a DLT, UB, or EZB for one-lung ventilation. The quality of lung collapse at the time of pleural opening and 10 and 20 minutes thereafter were assessed by the surgeon using the Lung Collapse Score (LCS; 0=no lung collapse to 10=best lung collapse). The time and number of attempts required to achieve lung isolation and the number of repositions required during surgery were measured. Tracheobronchial tree measurements were performed by radiologists from preoperative computed tomography imaging. The surgeon remained blinded to the type of device used. Twenty-nine patients were randomized to the DLT group and 30 patients to each of the EZB and UB groups. The LCSs among the groups at pleural opening and 10 minutes after pleural opening were not significantly different (p=0.34 and p=0.08, respectively). However, at 20 minutes after the pleural opening, the LCSs were significantly different among groups (p=0.02), with median scores being significantly lower for DLT (9 [IQR 8-9]) than for EZB (9 [IQR 9-10]; p=0.04) and UB (9.5 [IQR 9-10]; p=0.02). Lung isolation was achieved fastest in the DLT group (p < 0.01). The frequency of difficult placement did not significantly differ among groups, although it occurred most frequently in UB (n=7; 23.3%). Intraoperative repositioning also occurred most often with the UB (n=15; 50.0%). The EZB had the greatest number of cases requiring >2 repositions (n=4, 13.3%). There were no differences between preoperative airway measurements and time to isolation or incidence of intraoperative repositioning among the groups. The LCS was comparable among the 3 devices until 20 minutes after pleural opening, when better scores were obtained in the bronchial blocker groups. Lung isolation was achieved fastest with the DLT. The EZB had the highest incidence of cases requiring >2 intraoperative repositions, mostly occurring in R-sided surgery. For L-sided surgery, the EZB performed equally to the UB. This suggests that using the EZB for R-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be suboptimal. Preoperative airway dimensions did not correlate with time to achieve isolation or incidence of intraoperative malpositioning.

Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube vs EZ-Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background. The EZ-Blocker is the newest generation of bronchial blocker and offers a potential alternative to left-sided double lumen tubes for lung isolation and one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. Methods. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing left-sided double lumen tube to the EZ-Blocker for one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. The time for placement, incidence of intraoperative displacement, and surgeons' rating of lung collapse quality were designated as coprimary outcomes. The safety profiles of the two devices, including the incidence of airway trauma and post-extubation discomfort were also examined. Results. Six randomized controlled trials (495 patients) were analyzed. Compared to the EZ-Blocker, the left-sided double lumen tube was faster to place by a weighted mean difference of [95% CI] of -61.24 seconds [-102.48, -20.00] (P = .004) and was much less likely to become displaced during lung isolation with an odds ratio [95% CI] of .56 [.34, .91] (P = .02). The left-sided double lumen tube and the EZ-Blocker provided similar surgeon-rated quality of lung isolation. Although the left-sided double lumen tube caused a greater degree of post-extubation sore throat, there was a similar incidence of carinal trauma and post-extubation hoarseness compared to the EZ-Blocker. Conclusion. Our analysis suggests that the left-sided double lumen tube can be placed more quickly and is less prone to intraoperative displacement compared to the EZ-Blocker; the quality of lung collapse is similar. Thus, evidence appears to support the continued utilization of the left-sided double lumen tube for routine thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.

Anesthetic Management of a Case of Airway Bleeding During Pulmonary Artery Mass Resection

Airway bleeding is an uncommon complication of pulmonary artery surgery. It can be caused by fragile bronchopulmonary collateral, vessel perforation, and reperfusion pulmonary edema. Early discovery of the breach and anesthetic management are very important for the prognosis of the patients. We present a case of 58-year-old female diagnosed with left pulmonary artery mass. After the resection of the mass, the surgeon injected saline into the pulmonary artery and the patient was ventilated manually. Air bubbles were found in the artery, indicating a breach between the airways and the pulmonary circulation. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed the breach on the lateral wall of the left lower bronchus. We replaced the single lumen endotracheal tube with a 32 left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube to prevent the contamination of the right lung. After a consultation with the thoracic department, left lower lung lobectomy was performed.

Effect of Minimum Bronchial Cuff Volume of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube for One-Lung Ventilation on the Change in Bronchial Cuff Pressure during Lateral Positioning in Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

The minimum bronchial cuff volume (BCVmin) of a double-lumen tube (DLT) without air leaks during lung isolation may vary among individuals, and lateral positioning could increase the bronchial cuff pressure (BCP). We investigated the effect of initially established BCVmin (BCVi) on the change in BCP by lateral positioning. Seventy patients who underwent elective lung surgery were recruited and divided into two groups according to the BCVi obtained during anesthetic induction in each patient. Outcome analysis was conducted using data from 39 patients with a BCVi greater than 0 (BCVi > 0 group) and 27 with a BCVi of 0 (BCVi = 0 group). The primary outcome was a change in the value measured in the supine and lateral positions of the initially established BCP (BCPi; BCP at the time of BCVi injection), which was significantly larger in the BCVi > 0 group than in the BCVi = 0 group (1.5 (0.5-6.0) cmH2O vs. 0.0 (0.0-1.0) cmH2O; p < 0.001). BCVi was related to the left main bronchus (LMB) diameter (Spearman's rho = 0.676, p < 0.001) and the gap between the LMB diameter and the outer diameter of the bronchial cuff (Spearman's rho = 0.553, p < 0.001). Therefore, selecting a DLT size with a bronchial cuff that fits each patient's LMB may be useful in minimizing the change in BCP when performing lateral positioning during thoracic surgery. If the bronchial cuff requires unavoidable initial inflation, it is necessary to be aware that BCP may increase during lateral positioning and to monitor the BCP regularly if possible.

Unexpected Tension Pneumothorax after Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Pulmonary Edema: A Case Report

Tension pneumothorax is a relatively rare complication after anesthetic induction that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Several handling errors related to intubation procedures or equipment and vigorous positive pressure ventilation are potentially important etiologies of tension pneumothorax in patients with underlying lung disease or in mechanically ventilated patients. We describe a case of tension pneumothorax observed after double-lumen tube (DLT) insertion followed by single-lumen tube replacement using an airway exchanger catheter in a mechanically ventilated patient. An 84-year-old female on mechanical ventilation underwent minimally invasive cardiac surgery under general anesthesia. Immediately after left-sided DLT insertion using an airway exchanger catheter, oxygen saturation decreased to 89%, peak airway pressure increased to 35 cm H2O with inadequate tidal volume, and blood pressure gradually dropped to 69/41 mmHg. Breath sounds from the right hemithorax were significantly reduced. Severe collapse of the right lung, a flattened diaphragm, and compressed abdominal organs were identified on chest radiography. Therefore, a tube thoracotomy was performed based on the findings of a tension pneumothorax. Then, oxygen saturation, peak airway pressure with adequate tidal volume, and blood pressure improved, and the distended abdomen normalized. After the pneumothorax resolved, a bronchoscopy was performed. Slight redness was noted in the right bronchus, indicating that the DLT was incorrectly inserted into the right side. In conclusion, the possibility of a tension pneumothorax should be considered during DLT intubation or endotracheal tube replacement with an airway exchange catheter.

Effect of intubation in the lateral position under general anesthesia induction on the position of double-lumen tube placement in patients undergoing unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery: study protocol for a prospective, single-center, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundThe double-lumen tube (DLT) is an essential equipment for thoracic anesthesia and the precise position of DLT placement is particularly important for anesthesia and surgery. However, the incidence of DLT malposition remains high and it leads to lung isolation failure and hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation. This trial aims to explore the clinical application and efficacy of intubation in the lateral position under general anesthesia induction to reduce the incidence of DLT malposition in patients undergoing unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).MethodsIn this prospective, single-center, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial, we will recruit 108 patients, aged 18–80 years, scheduled for elective unilateral VATS with DLT intubation under general anesthesia, and they will be randomly assigned to two groups: a lateral DLT intubation group (group L) and a conventional supine DLT intubation group (group C). The left-sided DLT will be used to intubate in patients of both groups. The position of DLT will be confirmed and adjusted by using the fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). The primary outcome is the incidence of DLT malposition observed via the FOB, and the secondary outcomes include the time of intubation, the frequency and duration of re-adjustments of DLT placement under FOB, whether to re-intubate, intraoperative vital signs, and postoperative recovery.DiscussionAccurate DLT positioning is crucially important for thoracic surgery, but the incidence of DLT malposition is still high in the present clinical practice of thoracic anesthesia. This trial aims to investigate whether lateral DLT intubation can reduce the incidence of DLT malposition, with more stable intraoperative vital signs and less postoperative complications.Trial registrationThe study protocol was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn) with registration number: ChiCTR2200060794 on June 11, 2022.

Various Anaesthetic Techniques used in the Management of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Series of Three Cases

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is relatively uncommon and occurs most commonly after a road traffic accident (5%). Diaphragmatic rupture is mostly associated with vital organ injuries such as the liver, spleen, lungs, bones, pelvis, and brain, which can be severely damaged. The anaesthetic management of a patient presenting with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia depends on any associated vital organ injuries. Hereby, the author present a case series of three patients with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia with different presentations managed accordingly. In the first case, a 37-year-old male presented with diaphragmatic hernia and cervical spine fracture following a road traffic accident. Awake fibreoptic intubation was performed with utmost care to avoid further injury to the cervical spine. After intubation, positive pressure ventilation was given with low tidal volume to avoid barotrauma and to expand the atelectatic lung. The second case involved a 48-year-old male with a history of falling from a height one week prior, who presented with right-sided diaphragmatic rupture and a liver contusion. Intubation was performed using a left-sided double-lumen tube, and one-lung ventilation was applied to facilitate thoracotomy. A thoracic paravertebral block was administered to alleviate postoperative pain, providing good pain relief. In the third case, a 56-year-old male with a known case of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) presented to the hospital following a road traffic accident. The patient had lung contusion and haemopneumothorax with poor pulmonary reserve, and required emergency surgical repair. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was preferred over general anaesthesia, as intubation may cause bronchospasm and life-threatening complications in COPD patients.

Recent advances in double-lumen tube malposition in thoracic surgery: A bibliometric analysis and narrative literature review.

Thoracic surgery has increased drastically in recent years, especially in light of the severe outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Routine "passive" chest computed tomography (CT) screening of inpatients detects some pulmonary diseases requiring thoracic surgeries timely. As an essential device for thoracic anesthesia, the double-lumen tube (DLT) is particularly important for anesthesia and surgery. With the continuous upgrading of the DLTs and the widespread use of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB), the position of DLT in thoracic surgery is gradually becoming more stable and easier to observe or adjust. However, DLT malposition still occurs during transferring patients from a supine to the lateral position in thoracic surgery, which leads to lung isolation failure and hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Recently, some innovative DLTs or improved intervention methods have shown good results in reducing the incidence of DLT malposition. This review aims to summarize the recent studies of the incidence of left-sided DLT malposition, the reasons and effects of malposition, and summarize current methods for reducing DLT malposition and prospects for possible approaches. Meanwhile, we use bibliometric analysis to summarize the research trends and hot spots of the DLT research.

Radiographic Demonstration of Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction during One-lung Ventilation.

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction occurs when the microvasculature perfusing hypoxic alveoli vasoconstricts, diverting blood to oxygenated alveoli to match ventilation with perfusion.1 Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction can occur within seconds and reach a maximum intensity within minutes of hypoxia developing. It appears to be triggered by a mitochondrial redox signal secondary to changes in molecular oxygen that activates voltage-gated potassium and calcium channels which results in vasoconstriction.2 One-lung ventilation can acutely cause global alveolar hypoxia and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the nonventilated lung. It is estimated that blood flow to a nonventilated lung can be reduced by as much as 50% if the lung is without atelectasis.3The pulmonary angiograms were performed in a patient with a history of hemoptysis in whom a computed tomography angiogram demonstrated a pulmonary pseudoaneurysm with a presumed bronchial fistula in the right lung. The patient was scheduled for embolization with interventional radiology under general anesthesia. Because of concern for potential bleeding, lung isolation with a left-sided double lumen tube was positioned with the right lung open to ambient pressure. Isoflurane 1.1% was used for maintenance anesthesia. After approximately 15 min of one-lung ventilation, a pulmonary angiogram was performed that dramatically revealed selective peripheral microvascular perfusion to the left lung, but almost no microvascular perfusion to the right lung (fig. 1A and Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C912). This limited visualization of the right pseudoaneurysm. Repeat angiogram after 5 min of two-lung ventilation restored symmetric microvascular perfusion (fig. 1B and Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C913). The patient subsequently underwent selective catheterization and coil embolization of the pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm.The authors declare no competing interests.Pulmonary Angiogram during One-Lung Ventilation, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C912Pulmonary Angiogram during Two-Lung Ventilation, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C913

The Elevation of Double-Lumen Tube Cuff Pressure During Lung Surgery: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study☆,☆

Excessive tracheal tube cuff pressure can cause postoperative complications; however, the variations in the double-lumen tube cuff pressure in lung surgery have not been investigated. This study aimed to determine the incidence and variations in excess double- lumen tube cuff pressure during one-lung ventilation. A prospective observational study. Single secondary-care hospital. Patients aged ≥18 years scheduled for elective lung surgery using a left-sided double-lumen tube. None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each cuff of the double-lumen tube was connected to a pressure transducer, and the cuff pressure was continuously measured. The excess cuff pressure and its duration (%) were defined as ≥22 mmHg, and the ratio of the duration of excess cuff pressure to the duration of one-lung ventilation, respectively. In total, 147 patients were included in the final analysis. Eighty patients (54.5%) developed cuff pressure elevation in either cuff and 28 patients (19%) in both cuffs. Younger age, male sex, and left-sided surgery were associated with elevated bronchial cuff pressure. Concurrently, younger age, maximal peak inspiratory pressure, and obstructive respiratory dysfunction were associated with an elevated tracheal cuff pressure. A duration of excess cuff pressure >50% in either cuff was found in 34 patients (23%), and both cuffs in 5 patients (3.4%). The correlation between the duration of tracheal and bronchial excess cuff pressure was poor. A high incidence and long duration of excess tracheal and bronchial cuff pressure were observed during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery.

Comparisons of the segments of left-sided double-lumen tracheobronchial tubes as industrial products.

BackgroundAlthough there are at least seven manufacturers producing left-sided double-lumen tubes (DLTs), there have been few reports comparing the segments of these DLTs. In this study, we compared various segments of left-sided DLTs further.Materials and methodsWe examined five manufacturers’ left-sided DLTs: Mallinckrodt, Portex, Rüsch, Sheridan, and Daiken-medical. We conducted the following six trials or measurements, and three supplemental trials or measurements: First, we tried to pass various sizes of steel balls down each lumen in order from the smallest (3 mm) to largest (4.5 mm). If the ball passed on the first attempt, we tried just once; otherwise, we made a second attempt. Second, we measured the external diameter of tracheal and bronchial cuff using a profile projector. Third, we measured the length of the cuff and tip of the bronchial segment of the tubes using the profile projector. Fourth, we measured various lengths of the tubes. Fifth, we measured the external diameter of both lumens and the tubules for tracheal and bronchial cuff inflation. Finally, we measured various cross-sectional areas including the tracheal lumen, bronchial lumen, and tubules for cuff inflation. We also conducted three supplemental studies. First, we measured air volume in the cuff when intracuff pressure equaled 2 or 3 kPa. Second, we defined the configuration of the tracheal and bronchial cuffs. Third, we defined the presence or absence of bevels and also measured the angle of the bevels using the profile projector.ResultsWe performed nine trials and measurements and found large disparities between each manufacturer’s tubes.ConclusionsThe large disparities found between the measurements of the five manufacturers’ tubes may be due to different lots or changes in specifications made by each manufacturer. We found tubes exhibiting lower quality, such as deformations, and non-universal and inconsistent sizing, in the comparison of the manufacturers’ tubes. Practitioners should be aware of the features and aspects of these tubes.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01698-2.

Comparison of Airtraq DL™ and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube placement in simulated difficult airway: A randomised study.

ABSTRACTBackground and Aims:The Airtraq DL ™ is a prototype channeled video laryngoscope, designed specifically for endobronchial intubation with a double-lumen tube (DLT). Evidence on its superiority over Macintosh laryngoscope for DLT placement in the difficult airway is limited. This study compared the efficacy of both these laryngoscopes in the simulated difficult airway.Methods:A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted on 52 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with lung isolation using a left-sided DLT. The patients were randomised into Airtraq DL ™ group (group A) and Macintosh group (group M). The primary objective was to compare the time required for intubation, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate time to best glottic view, Cormack–Lehane (CL) grading, intubation difficulty score (IDS), manoeuvres, attempts at intubation, haemodynamic response and complications. Operating anaesthesiologists were also asked to grade the ease of laryngoscopy and intubation for both devices on a 4-point Likert scale.Results:The mean time to intubation was found to be lesser in group A than in group M (18 ± 6.91 s vs 25.48 ± 9.47 s, P = 0.003). Group A showed better CL grading (P ≤ 0.001), lesser requirement of manoeuvres (P = 0.02) and lower IDS (P = 0.003). Also, group A had significantly better Likert scale results as compared to group M.Conclusion:The Airtraq DL ™ is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope as it requires lesser time for intubation and provides favourable intubating conditions (better CL grading, lesser manoeuvres, lower IDS and improved Likert scales) for double-lumen placement in the simulated difficult airway.

Lung ultrasound is non-inferior to bronchoscopy for confirmation of double-lumen endotracheal tube positioning: a randomized controlled noninferiority study

BackgroundAppropriate placement of left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes (LDLTs) is paramount for optimal visualization of the operative field during thoracic surgeries that require single lung ventilation. Appropriate placement of LDLTs is therefore confirmed with fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) rather than clinical assessment alone. Recent studies have demonstrated lung ultrasound (US) is superior to clinical assessment alone for confirming placement of LDLT, but no large trials have compared US to the gold standard of FOB. This noninferiority trial was devised to compare lung US with FOB for LDLT positioning and achievement of lung collapse for operative exposure.MethodsThis randomized, controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from October 2017 to July 2019. The study enrolled 200 ASA classification 1–3 patients that were scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring placement of LDLT. Study patients were randomized into either the FOB group or the lung US group after initial blind placement of LDLT. Five patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. In the FOB group (n = 98), fiberoptic bronchoscopy was used to confirm lung collapse due to proper positioning of the LDLT, and to adjust the tube if necessary. In the US group (n = 97), lung ultrasonography of four pre-specified zones (upper and lower posterior and mid-axillary) was used to assess lung collapse and guide adjustment of the tube if necessary. The primary outcome was presence of adequate lung collapse as determined by visual grading by the attending surgeon on scale from 1 to 4. Secondary outcomes included the time needed to adjust and confirm lung collapse, the time from finishing LDLT positioning to the grading of lung collapse, and intraoperative parameters such has hypotension or hypertension, hypoxia, and hypercarbia. The patient, attending anesthesiologist, and attending thoracic surgeon were all blinded to the intervention arm.ResultsThe primary outcome of lung collapse by visual grading was similar between the intervention and the control groups, with 89 patients (91.8%) in the US group compared to 83 patients (84.1%) in the FOB group (p = 0.18) experiencing adequate collapse. This met criteria for noninferiority per protocol analysis. The median time needed to confirm and adjust LDLT position in the US group was 3 min (IQR 2–5), which was significantly shorter than the median time needed to perform the task in the FOB group (6 min, IQR 4–10) (p = 0.002).ConclusionsIn selected patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring LDLT, lung ultrasonography was noninferior to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in achieving adequate lung collapse and reaches the desired outcome in less time.Trial RegistrationThis study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03314519, Principal investigator: Kasana Raksamani, Date of registration: 19/10/2017.