Left-sided Colorectal Surgery Research Articles

Robotic Splenic Flexure Takedown: Single Docking Crossed-Arm Technique.

Splenic flexure mobilization is typically required in the management of left-sided colon and rectal resections to achieve tension-free anastomosis. Although the da Vinci Xi® surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was designed for multi-quadrant operations, robotic mobilization of the splenic flexure continues to be challenging for some surgeons. Re-docking and patient repositioning may be required, which can be time-consuming, especially in centers without motion-activated operating tables. However, there are some tips and tricks to overcome these challenges. Here, we describe our single docking crossed-arm technique, which facilitates splenic flexure mobilization. We demonstrate our technique in a 61-year-old woman with sigmoid colon cancer, and informed consent was obtained. The operation starts in the medial-to-lateral approach by ligating the inferior mesenteric artery and vein. After the left colon mobilization, robotic arm one (tip-up fenestrated grasper) is positioned on the patient's left, while arms two, three, and four are on the patient's right. A tip-up fenestrated grasper, inserted through port #1, retracts the descending colon medial and inferior towards the cecum. Then, we cross the arms from the lateral aspect of arm one and takedown the flexure without the collision of robotic arms. After the lateral side dissection is completed, we change the position of the instruments to mobilize the transverse colon. This time, the tip-up grasping instrument is used to retract the colon through the left lower quadrant, which enables us to work in the medial aspect of the grasping instrument. Dissection can be performed using bipolar forceps, monopolar scissors, or vessel-sealing devices. We achieved complete mobilization of the splenic flexure. With this technique, dissection can be carried medially and cranially beyond the falciform ligament. After the splenic flexure takedown and freeing up the mesocolon above the pancreatic body, tension-free anastomosis can be performed. In this approach, re-docking is not necessary. During robotic left-sided colorectal surgery, the crossed-arm technique with single docking avoids robotic arms collision and restricted mobility of the left upper quadrant instrument (port#1). This technique facilitates robotic splenic flexure mobilization and eliminates re-docking/repositioning, leading to shorter operative time and improved intraoperative flow. See Video Vignette.

Laser speckle flowgraphy has comparable accuracy to indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in assessing bowel blood perfusion.

To investigate the accuracy of laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG), a noninvasive method for the quantitative evaluation of blood flow using mean blur rate (MBR) as a blood flow parameter in the assessment of bowel blood perfusion compared to indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA). We enrolled 46 patients who underwent left-sided colorectal surgery. LSFG and ICG-FA were applied to assess blood bowel perfusion, with MBR and luminance as parameters, respectively. In both measurement methods, the position where the parameter suddenly decreased was defined as the blood flow boundary line. Subsequently, the blood flow boundaries created after processing the blood vessels flowing into the intestinal tract were determined using LSFG and ICG-FA, and concordance between the two was examined. Blood flow boundaries were visually identified using color tone changes on a color map created based on MBR in LSFG and using differences in luminance in ICG-FA. The distances between the transection line and blood flow boundaries determined using each method were compared. The location of blood flow boundaries matched in 65% (30/46) of cases. Although locations differed in the remaining 35% (16/46), all were located on the anal side near the transection line, and the difference was not clinically significant. The average distances between the transection line and blood flow boundary were 2.76 (SD = 3.25) and 3.71 (SD = 4.26) mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.38). LSFG was shown to have comparable accuracy to ICG-FA, and may be useful for evaluating bowel perfusion.

Assessing anatomical variations of the inferior mesenteric artery via three-dimensional CT angiography and laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a retrospective observational study

To assess the anatomy of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and its branches by reviewing laparoscopic left-sided colorectal cancer surgery videos and comparing them with preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) angiography, to verify the accuracy of 3D-CT vascular reconstruction techniques. High-definition surgical videos and preoperative imaging data of 200 patients who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colorectal cancer surgery were analysed, and the alignment of the IMA and its branches in relation to the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) was observed and summarized. The above two methods were used to measure the length of the IMA and its branches. Of 200 patients, 47.0% had the sigmoid arteries (SAs) arise from the common trunk with the superior rectal artery (SRA), and 30.5% had the SAs arise from the common trunk with the left colic artery (LCA). In 3.5% of patients, the SAs arising from both the LCA and SRA. The LCA, SA, and SRA emanated from the same point in 13.5% of patients, and the LCA was absent in 5.5% of patients. The range of D cm (IMA length measured by intraoperative silk thread) and d cm (IMA length measured by 3D-CT vascular reconstruction) in all cases was 1.84–6.62 cm and 1.85–6.52 cm, respectively, and there was a significant difference between them. (p < 0.001). The lengths between the intersection of the LCA and IMV measured intraoperatively were 0.64–4.29 cm, 0.87–4.35 cm, 1.32–4.28 cm and 1.65–3.69 cm in types 1A, 1B, 1C, and 2, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.994). There was only a significant difference in the length of the IMA between the 3D-CT vascular reconstruction and intraoperative observation data, which can provide guidance to surgeons in preoperative preparation.

Clinical Utility of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Real-Time Quantification of Bowel Perfusion in Minimally Invasive Left-Sided Colorectal Resections.

Left-sided colorectal surgery demonstrates high anastomotic leak rates, with tissue ischemia thought to influence outcomes. Indocyanine green is commonly used for perfusion assessment, but evidence remains mixed for whether it reduces colorectal anastomotic leaks. Laser speckle contrast imaging provides dye-free perfusion assessment in real-time through perfusion heat maps and quantification. This study investigates the efficacy of advanced visualization (indocyanine green versus laser speckle contrast imaging), perfusion assessment, and utility of laser speckle perfusion quantification in determining ischemic margins. Prospective intervention group using advanced visualization with case-matched, retrospective control group. Single academic medical center. Forty adult patients undergoing elective, minimally invasive, left-sided colorectal surgery. Intraoperative perfusion assessment using white light imaging and advanced visualization at 3 time points: T1-proximal colon after devascularization, before transection, T2-proximal/distal colon before anastomosis, and T3-completed anastomosis. Intraoperative indication of ischemic line of demarcation before resection under each visualization method, surgical decision change using advanced visualization, post hoc laser speckle perfusion quantification of colorectal tissue, and 30-day postoperative outcomes. Advanced visualization changed surgical decision-making in 17.5% of cases. For cases in which surgeons changed a decision, the average discordance between the line of demarcation in white light imaging and advanced visualization was 3.7 cm, compared to 0.41 cm ( p = 0.01) for cases without decision changes. There was no statistical difference between the line of ischemic demarcation using laser speckle versus indocyanine green ( p = 0.16). Laser speckle quantified lower perfusion values for tissues beyond the line of ischemic demarcation while suggesting an additional 1 cm of perfused tissue beyond this line. One (2.5%) anastomotic leak occurred in the intervention group. This study was not powered to detect differences in anastomotic leak rates. Advanced visualization using laser speckle and indocyanine green provides valuable perfusion information that impacts surgical decision-making in minimally invasive left-sided colorectal surgeries. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía colorrectal del lado izquierdo demuestra altas tasas de fuga anastomótica, y se cree que la isquemia tisular influye en los resultados. El verde de indocianina se utiliza habitualmente para evaluar la perfusión, pero la evidencia sobre si reduce las fugas anastomóticas colorrectales sigue siendo contradictoria. Las imágenes de contraste moteado con láser proporcionan una evaluación de la perfusión sin colorantes en tiempo real a través de mapas de calor de perfusión y cuantificación.OBJETIVO:Este estudio investiga la eficacia de la evaluación de la perfusión mediante visualización avanzada (verde de indocianina versus imágenes de contraste moteado con láser) y la utilidad de la cuantificación de la perfusión con moteado láser para determinar los márgenes isquémicos.DISEÑO:Grupo de intervención prospectivo que utiliza visualización avanzada con un grupo de control retrospectivo de casos emparejados.LUGARES:Centro médico académico único.PACIENTES:Cuarenta pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva, mínimamente invasiva, del lado izquierdo.INTERVENCIONES:Evaluación de la perfusión intraoperatoria mediante imágenes con luz blanca y visualización avanzada en tres puntos temporales: T1-colon proximal después de la devascularización, antes de la transección; T2-colon proximal/distal antes de la anastomosis; y T3-anastomosis completa.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Indicación intraoperatoria de la línea de demarcación isquémica antes de la resección bajo cada método de visualización, cambio de decisión quirúrgica mediante visualización avanzada, cuantificación post-hoc de la perfusión con láser moteado del tejido colorrectal y resultados posoperatorios a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:La visualización avanzada cambió la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas en el 17,5% de los casos. Para los casos en los que los cirujanos cambiaron una decisión, la discordancia promedio entre la línea de demarcación en las imágenes con luz blanca y la visualización avanzada fue de 3,7 cm, en comparación con 0,41 cm (p = 0,01) para los casos sin cambios de decisión. No hubo diferencias estadísticas entre la línea de demarcación isquémica utilizando láser moteado versus verde de indocianina (p = 0,16). El moteado con láser cuantificó valores de perfusión más bajos para los tejidos más allá de la línea de demarcación isquémica y al mismo tiempo sugirió 1 cm adicional de tejido perfundido más allá de esta línea. Se produjo una fuga anastomótica (2,5%) en el grupo de intervención.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio no tuvo el poder estadístico suficiente para detectar diferencias en las tasas de fuga anastomótica.CONCLUSIONES:La visualización avanzada utilizando moteado láser y verde de indocianina proporciona información valiosa sobre la perfusión que impacta la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas en cirugías colorrectales mínimamente invasivas del lado izquierdo. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo).

Intracorporeal antimesenteric ancillary trocar: an anastomotic technique facilitating natural orifice specimen extraction in left-sided colorectal surgery.

Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in left-sided colorectal surgery requires application of the circular stapler anvil to the proximal bowel without exteriorization through an additional abdominal incision. We describe an intracorporeal method to secure the stapler anvil, termed the intracorporeal antimesenteric ancillary trocar (IAAT) technique. The ancillary trocar is attached to the stapler anvil before introduction into the abdominal cavity through the anal or vaginal orifice. The colon is incised before the trocar spike is brought out through the antimesenteric surface 3-4 cm within the cut edge. A linear stapler is used to seal the bowel end. The ancillary trocar is detached and retrieved via the NOSE conduit. Following the NOSE procedure, a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis is performed with the transanal circular stapler. Ten consecutive patients underwent elective left-sided colorectal resection with IAAT for NOSE (seven transanal, three transvaginal) from January to June 2023. Median age and body mass index were 66 (range 47-74) years and 24.3 (range 17.9-30.8) kg/m2 respectively. Two (20%) patients underwent sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid volvulus while eight (80%) underwent anterior resection for colorectal cancer. Median operating time, operative blood loss and postoperative length of hospital stay were 170 (range 140-240) min, 20 (range 10-40) mL and 1 (range 1-3) day respectively. There were no postoperative complications, readmissions or reoperations. Median follow-up duration was 3 (range 1-6) months. The IAAT double-stapling side-to-end anastomotic technique is safe and feasible for patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with NOSE, resulting in good outcomes.

Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study

PurposesTo compare the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) between Ethicon manual circular staplers (two-row) versus Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology (three-row) and between Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ Series technology (two-row) versus Tri-Staple™ technology.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients who underwent a left-sided colorectal surgery 2019–2022 in U.S. Premier Healthcare Database to assess the risk of AL within 30 days post-index procedure. The study devices were Ethicon manual circular staplers, Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology, and Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology.ResultsAcross 447 hospitals, the cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of AL within 30 days post-index procedure were 7.78% (6.91–8.74%) among 8337 patients in the Ethicon manual circular stapler cohort, 7.54% (6.87–8.27%) among 7928 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology cohort, and 8.19% (6.57–10.07%) among 1306 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology cohort. Comparative analyses revealed no difference comparing Ethicon manual circular staplers with Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with Tri-Staple™ technology (risk ratio [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52–1.01) or comparing Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with DST™ technology to Tri-Staple™ technology (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53–1.06).ConclusionIn this analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing a left-sided colorectal surgery from a U.S. hospital database, the risk of AL observed with manual two-row circular staplers was similar to that seen with three-row devices. This study affirms the safety of manual two-row circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis.

Endoscopic Stricturoplasty with Linear Stapler: An Efficient Alternative for the Refractory Rectal Anastomotic Stricture

IntroductionSymptomatic anastomotic stricture is a rare but major complication after left-sided colorectal surgery. Hydraulic balloon dilatation is the first-line treatment in cases where the complication occurs, but 20% of patients present with refractory strictures after multiple sessions. Endoscopic stricturoplasty with the use of a linear stapler is a novel therapeutic alternative for those difficult cases.Materials and MethodsWe identified all patients in our department who underwent endoscopic stricturoplasty with a linear stapler between 2004 and 2022. The technical, periinterventional, and follow-up data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsWe identified nine patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The procedure was technically possible in eight cases, whereas in one case, the anatomy of the anastomosis did not allow for a correct placement of the stapler. All patients with a technically successful procedure were relieved from their symptoms and could have their ostomy reversed. There was no periprocedural morbidity and mortality. Two patients presented with a recurrent stricture eight and 26 months after the initial stricturoplasty, and the procedure was successfully repeated in both cases.ConclusionsEndoscopic stricturoplasty is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of refractory anastomotic strictures in the distal colon and rectum for patients with a suitable anatomy.

Robotic Anterior Resection for Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer using Single Port Access.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and a robotic surgical system have recently been included in contemporary colorectal surgical practice. 1-4 SPLS may result in better cosmetic outcomes, reduced postoperative incisional pain, fewer incisional hernias, minimal organ damage, and fewer wound complications. 2,5 However, SPLS for left-sided colorectal cancer is a challenging technique, even for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons, owing to the difficulty of constructing instrument triangulation and using endo-staplers in the pelvic cavity from a single umbilical port with adequate distal margins. The Da Vinci Si Single-Site ® system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) was specifically developed to overcome SPLS limitations. Since the robotic instruments are crossed at the port site, but the software "reassigns" them to the surgeon's hand on the robotic console, the platform can easily create instrument triangulation while minimizing external robotic arm collisions. 6-8 Due to the lack of wrist articulation, the limited range of motion of the semi-rigid robotic instruments, and the limited choice of instruments, the Single-Site ® platform has not yet been widely utilized for colorectal diseases. A novel robotic technique, the da Vinci SP ® system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), was designed for single-site surgery. This platform has a robotic arm with a high degree of freedom that is introduced directly into the peritoneal cavity through a single incision. The benefits of the single-port da Vinci robot platform include a holographic display of the instrument location, wristed articulation and flexible elbows, a console-controlled camera, and three-dimensional optics. This robotic system for single-port access can perform lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery using 4-arm wrist articulation while preserving the autonomic nerves during left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer

BackgroundThe effect of fecal stream diversion on the gut microbiota is still uncertain. The present study was designed to assess the effect of fecal stream diversion on the composition of the gut microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. We included patients undergoing left-sided colorectal cancer surgery with (ileostomy group) or without (control group) diverting ileostomy. Fecal samples were collected from 10 patients in each group before surgery (t1) and after ileostomy repair in the ileostomy group and 6–12 months after the initial surgery in the control group (t2). The fecal microbiota was assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing, and changes in the composition of the fecal microbiota were compared between the two groups.ResultsAlpha diversity analysis revealed that the complexity of fecal microbiota decreased between t1 and t2 only in the ileostomy group. Beta diversity analysis also showed dissimilarity between t1 and t2 only in the ileostomy group. The composition of the microbiota was similar between the two groups at t1. However, at t2, the ileostomy group had lower proportion of beneficial bacteria (Lachnospiraceae, 3.8% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001; Ruminococcaceae, 0.6% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.001; Blautia, 0.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001; Faecalibacterium, 0.2% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of harmful bacteria (Proteobacteria, 17.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.006; Clostridium, 16.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.013; Streptococcus, 17.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.002) than the control group.ConclusionsFecal stream diversion was closely associated with less diversity and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota.

Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe powered circular stapler, which was developed with the aim of providing reliable and reproducible anastomosis, provides complete anastomosis, resulting in a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of anastomotic leakage between a conventional manual circular stapler (MCS) and the ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler (ECPS) in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer who underwent anastomosis with the double stapling technique.MethodsA total of 187 patients with left-sided colorectal cancer who underwent anastomosis with the double stapling technique with a conventional MCS or the ECPS during surgery at Osaka City University Hospital between January 2016 and July 2022 were enrolled in this study.ResultsThe incidence of anastomotic leakage in the ECPS group was significantly lower than that in the MCS group (4.4% versus 14.3%, p = 0.048). Furthermore, even after propensity score matching, an association was found between the use of the ECPS and a reduced incidence of anastomotic leakage.ConclusionThe ECPS has the potential to help reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage in left-sided colorectal surgery.

Education Team Time Out in Oncologic Visceral Surgery Optimizes Surgical Resident Training and Team Communication–Results of a Prospective Trial

Surgical education is highly dependent on intraoperative communication. Trainers must know the trainee's training level to ensure high-quality surgical training. A systematic preoperative dialogue (Educational Team Time Out, ETO) was established to discuss the steps of each surgical procedure. Over 6 months, ETO was performed within a time limit of 3 minutes. Digital surveys on the utility of ETO and its impact on performance were conducted immediately after surgery and at the end of the study period among the staff of the participating disciplines (trainer, trainee, surgical nursing staff, anaesthesiologists, and medical students). The number of surgical substeps performed was recorded and compared with the equivalent period one year earlier. ETO was performed in 64 of the 103 eligible operations (62%). Liver resection (n = 37) was the most frequent procedure, followed by left-sided colorectal surgery (n = 12), partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 6), right-sided hemicolectomies (n = 5), and thyroidectomies (n = 4). Anaesthesiologists most frequently reported that ETO had a direct impact on their work during surgery (90.9%). The influence scores were 46.8% for trainees, 8.8% for trainers, 53.3% for surgical nursing staff and 66.6% for medical students. During the implementation of ETO, a trend towards more assisted substeps in oncologic visceral surgery was seen compared to the corresponding period one year earlier (51% vs.40%; p = 0.11). ETO leads to improved intraoperative communication and more performed substeps during complex procedures, which increases motivation and practical training. This concept can easily be implemented in all surgical specialties to improve surgical education.

Vascular anatomical study of persistent descending mesocolon in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) is a rare congenital atypia of fixation of the descending colon, and currently, very few detailed studies exist on its vascular anatomy. This study was conducted to evaluate the features of the vascular anatomy of PDM to help avoid intraoperative lethal injury and subsequent postoperative complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 534 patients who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. PDM was diagnosed using preoperative axial computed tomography (CT) view. The vascular anatomical features were compared between PDM and non-PDM cases based on three-dimensional (3D)-CT angiography findings. Additionally, the perioperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in the 534 patients were also compared between PDM and non-PDM cases. Of the total 534 patients, 13 patients (2.4%) presented with PDM. No branching pattern of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) specific to PDM was found. In the running direction of the IMA and sigmoidal colic artery (SA), the midline-shift of IMA and the right-shift of SA were significantly more in PDM than in non-PDM cases, respectively (38.5% vs. 2.5%, P ≤ .0001; 61.5% vs. 4.6%, P ≤ .0001). The perioperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in the 534 patients were similar between PDM and non-PDM cases. Because changes in the direction of the vascular running are often observed due to adhesions and shortening of the mesentery in PDM cases, performing a detailed preoperative evaluation of vascular anatomy using imaging modalities such as 3D-CT angiography is important.

Challenges in the interdisciplinary treatment of leakages after left-sided colorectal surgery: endoscopic negative pressure therapy, open-pore film drainage therapy and beyond

PurposeThe treatment of anastomotic leakage after left colorectal surgery remains challenging. Since its introduction, endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) has proven to be advantageous, reducing the necessity of surgical revision. The aim of our study is to present our experience with endoscopic treatment of colorectal leakages and to identify potential factors influencing treatment outcome.MethodsPatients who underwent endoscopic treatment of colorectal leakage were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoint was the healing rate and success of endoscopic therapy.ResultsWe identified 59 patients treated with ENPT between January 2009 and December 2019. The overall closure rate was 83%, whereas only 60% of the patients were successfully treated with ENPT and 23% needed further surgery. The time between diagnosis of leakage and uptake of endoscopic treatment did not influence the closure rate, but patients with chronic fistula (> 4 weeks) showed a significantly higher reoperation rate than those with an acute fistula (94% vs 6%, p = 0.01).ConclusionENPT is a successful treatment option for colorectal leakages, which appears to be more favorable when started early. Further studies are still needed to better describe its healing potential, but it deserves an integral role in the interdisciplinary treatment of anastomotic leakages.

Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery.

Mortality from emergency left-sided colorectal surgery can be substantial due to acuteness of the presentation and the urgent need to operate in the setting of a limited preparation in a morbid patient. Determine the 30-day postoperative outcomes and identify risk factors for complications and mortality following emergency colorectal operations. Retrospective SETTINGS: Three tertiary hospitals in three countries. Factors that were studied included age, sex, ASA score, type and extent of the operation, and presence/absence of malignancy. Unadjusted 30-day patient outcomes examined were complications and mortality. Differences in proportions were assessed using the Pearson chi-square test while logistic regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the correlation between risk factors and outcomes. 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 104 patients. Among 104 patients, 70 (67.3%) were men, and 34 (32.7%) were women. The mean (SD) age was 57.2 (17.1) years. The most common indication for emergency colonic surgery was malignant obstruction in 33 (31.7%) patients. The postoperative complication rate was 24% (25/104), and the mortality rate was 12.5% (13/104) within 30 days of the operation. The ASA status (P=.02), presence of malignancy (P=.02), and the presence of complications (P=.004) were significantly related to mortality in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. The 30-day mortality of emergency colorectal operations is greatly influenced by the presence of malignancy in the colon and physiological status at the time of the procedure. The retrospective design and small sample size. None.

Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aims to evaluate comparative outcomes following midline versus off-midline specimen extractions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. A systematic search of electronic information sources was conducted. Studies comparing 'midline' versus 'off midline' specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections performed for malignancies were included. The rate of incisional hernia formation, surgical site infection (SSI), total operative time and blood loss, anastomotic leak (AL) and length of hospital stay (LOS) was the evaluated outcome parameters. Five comparative observational studies reporting a total of 1187 patients comparing midline (n = 701) and off-midline (n = 486) approaches for specimen extraction were identified. Specimen extraction performed through an off-midline incision was not associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; P = 0.68), the occurrence of AL (OR: 0.76; P = 0.66) and future development of incisional hernias (OR: 0.65; P = 0.64) compared to the conventional midline approach. No statistically significant difference was observed in total operative time (mean difference [MD]: 0.13; P = 0.99), intraoperative blood loss (MD: 2.31; P = 0.91) and LOS (MD: 0.78; P = 0.18) between the two groups. Off-midline specimen extraction following minimally invasive left-sided colorectal cancer surgery is associated with similar rates of SSI and incisional hernia formation compared to the vertical midline incision. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for evaluated outcomes such as total operative time, intra-operative blood loss, AL rate and LOS. As such, we did not find any advantage of one approach over the other. Future high-quality well-designed trials are required to make robust conclusions.

Comparison of robotic reduced-port and laparoscopic approaches for left-sided colorectal cancer surgery

Background/objectiveThe reduced-port approach can overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic surgery while maintaining its advantages. Here, we compared the effects of robotic reduced-port surgery and conventional laparoscopic approaches for left-sided colorectal cancer. MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2016, the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of 17 patients undergoing robotic reduced-port surgery and 49 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer were compared. ResultsThe two groups were comparable in almost all outcome measures except for the distal resection margin, which was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The between-group differences in reoperation, incisional hernia development, and overall and progression-free survival were nonsignificant; however, the total hospital cost was significantly higher in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (US$13779.6 ± US$3114.8 vs. US$8556.3 ± US$2056.7, P < 0.001). ConclusionRobotic reduced-port surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer is safe and effective but more expensive with no additional benefit compared with the conventional laparoscopic approach. This observation warrants further evaluation.

Oral antibiotics and a low-residue diet reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Anastomotic leakage is a potential complication after colorectal surgery. We investigated the effects of oral antibiotics and a low-residue diet on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal surgery. Outcomes were retrospectively compared between 64 patients who underwent mechanical bowel preparation alone (group A) and 183 patients who underwent mechanical bowel preparation with addition of oral kanamycin and metronidazole (group B) on the day before left-sided colorectal surgery. After surgery, patients in group A received a normal diet containing dietary fiber and those in group B received a low-residue diet. The primary outcome was the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes were rates of other postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and laboratory data. Anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, and diarrhea were less common in group B than in group A (4.9% vs 18.8%, 6.6% vs 23.4%, and 25.7% vs 43.8%, respectively). Postoperative C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower in group B. The median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in group B than in group A (8days vs 9days, P = 0.010). Adaptive double least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression revealed that use of preoperative oral antibiotics and a postoperative low-residue diet were associated with lower incidence of anastomotic leakage (odds ratio 0.163, 95% confidence interval 0.062-0.430; P < 0.001). Oral antibiotics and a low-residue diet reduced the incidence of anastomotic leakage and shortened the postoperative hospital stay by 1day.

Prediction of anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study utilizing quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurs with some frequency in all types of colorectal cancer surgery and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and recurrence rates. Complications might be prevented by monitoring intra-operative bowel perfusion at the anastomotic site. A pilot study concerning the objective and quantitative measurement of tissue perfusion by monitoring regional tissue saturation of oxygen (rSO2) was conducted, using the In Vivo Optical Spectroscopy (INVOS™) system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). This study evaluated the ability of the INVOS™ system to predict AL after left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. rSO2 measurements of the oral side of the site of bowel anastomosis were taken before anastomosis in 73 patients. Clinical factors, including rSO2, were analyzed to identify risk factors for AL. Among 73 patients, 6 (8.2%) experienced AL. The rSO2 values of the oral anastomotic site were significantly lower in AL patients than in non-AL patients. In the multivariate analysis, the rSO2 value of the oral anastomotic site was an independent risk factor for AL. Monitoring the rSO2 at the anastomotic site enabled the prediction of AL. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of the INVOS™ system for monitoring intestinal rSO2 is in progress.

EP.TH.965Use of Oral Antibiotics as Adjunct to Systemic Antibiotics and Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Left Sided Colorectal Surgery. It is the time to trust the best available evidence and change the practice

Abstract Aims To prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy of oral antibiotics as an adjunct to intravenous antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in patients undergoing left sided colorectal surgery. Methods All participants aged 18 years or older and of any gender undergoing an elective open or laparoscopic left sided colorectal resection for benign or malignant colorectal pathologies were considered. The intervention of interest was oral neomycin 1g every 4 hours combined with oral metronidazole 400mg every 8 hours from 24 hours before the proposed surgery. Surgical site infections (SSIs), anastomotic leak, paralytic ileus, need for intervention, and mortality were the evaluated outcome parameters. Results Forty-two consecutive patients received oral antibiotics as an adjunct to intravenous antibiotics and MBP before left sided colorectal surgery. The mean age was 58.8 ± 11.5. There were 23 males (54.8%) and 19 females (45.2%). Use of oral antibiotics was associated with SSI infection rate of 2.4% (1 patient). The rates of clinically significant and non-significant anastomotic leak were 0% and 2.9%, respectively. Moreover, postoperative ileus happened in 11.9% of patients. Furthermore, there was no mortality or need for re-intervention. Conclusions Use of oral antibiotics as an adjunct to intravenous antibiotics and MBP in patients undergoing left-sided colorectal surgery was associated with a surprisingly low rate of SSIs and no significant anastomotic leak. It is time to trust the best available evidence and incorporate the use of oral antibiotics as an adjunct to intravenous antibiotics and MBP in colorectal surgery protocols in the UK hospitals.

Anatomical framework for pre-operative planning of laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery: Potential relevance of the distance between the inferior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric vein

BackgroundThe medial-to-lateral approach is favored by most colorectal surgeons for laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection and mobilisation of the left colon. The peritoneal access window, i.e. the distance between the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) must be large enough to perform the procedure safely and successfully. However, studies investigating the IMA–IMV distance and factors affecting this variable, are scarce. Therefore, we examined the IMA–IMV and D3-IMA distances to determine an anatomical framework on planning and adapting surgical therapy. Basic proceduresThe IMA–IMV and D3-IMA distances were retrospectively measured in 230 patients (127 Male/103 Female, Median Age=54.5) who had undergone pre-operative CT-scanning before laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. Two observers rated the images and interrater reliability was calculated. Subgroup, simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed in order to detect potential interaction between morphometric variables and IMA–IMV distance. Main findingsWe demonstrated a significant correlation between the inferior margin of the duodenum and the origin of IMA. Determination of the IMA–IMV distance was simple and reproducible. Approximately 45% of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal procedures had a narrow distance (≤50mm). There was a sexual dimorphism in IMA–IMV distance, being consistently large in males. There were no other pre-operative factors which predicted whether the peritoneal dissection window for a medial-to-lateral approach was sufficient. ConclusionsOur results provide new data for a better understanding of metric variations in abdominal vascular structures and complement previous observations. In view of our results, we recommend pre-operative measurement of the IMA–IMV before colorectal surgery where the medial-to-lateral approach is planned. Given that a narrow distance may predict a difficult dissection, this factor should be taken into account to determine the optimal surgical approach in each patient.