Left-sided Colectomy Research Articles

A commentary on 'Short-term outcomes following intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right and left-sided colectomy: a propensity score-matched study'.

A commentary on 'Short-term outcomes following intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right and left-sided colectomy: a propensity score-matched study'.

Early discharge following colectomy for colon cancer: A national perspective.

Although early discharge after colectomy has garnered significant interest, contemporary, large-scale analyses are lacking. The present study utilized a national cohort of patients undergoing colectomy to examine costs and readmissions following early discharge. All adults undergoing elective colectomy for primary colon cancer were identified in the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with perioperative complications or prolonged length of stay (>8 days) were excluded to enhance cohort homogeneity. Patients discharged by postoperative day 3 were classified as Early, and others as Routine. Entropy balancing and multivariable regression were used to assess the risk-adjusted association of early discharge with costs and non-elective readmissions. Importantly, we compared 90-day stroke rates to examine whether our results were influenced by preferential early discharge of healthier patients. Of an estimated 153,996 patients, 45.5% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to Routine, the Early cohort was younger and more commonly male. Patients in the Early group more commonly underwent left-sided colectomy and laparoscopic operations. Following multivariable adjustment, expedited discharge was associated with a $4,500 reduction in costs as well as lower 30-day (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.74, p<0.001) and 90-day non-elective readmissions (AOR 0.74, p<0.001). However, among those readmitted within 90 days, Early patients were more commonly readmitted for gastrointestinal conditions (45.8 vs 36.4%, p<0.001). Importantly, both cohorts had comparable 90-day stroke rates (2.2 vs 2.1%, p = 0.80). The present work represents the largest analysis of early discharge following colectomy for cancer and supports its relative safety and cost-effectiveness.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and quality of life after colectomy.

Clinical experience shows complaints similar to LARS not only after rectal surgery, but even after other types of colorectal surgery. Our aim was to investigate the occurrence of LARS after several types of colorectal surgery and its impact on quality of life. We included adult patients who underwent colorectal surgery at our centre from January 2016 until March 2019, regardless of indication. A questionnaire was sent evaluating LARS and quality of life. The questionnaire was answered by 119 patients. We noticed highest LARS-score after rectum surgery (26.1), but also surprisingly higher LARS-score after right-sided colectomy (21.0) compared to left-sided colectomy (16.4). We report lowest quality of life after rectal surgery, but higher quality of life in left colectomy compared to right colectomy. LARS-score did not significantly correlate with type of procedure; however, higher LARS-scores were noted after right-sided colectomy compared to left-sided colectomy with similar impact on quality of life. We suggest CORS (colorectal resection syndrome) as a more suiting conceptual name instead of LARS to describe functional bowel complaints after colorectal surgery.

Short-term outcomes following intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right and left-sided colectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) during laparoscopic colectomy to those undergoing extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). The study was a single-centre retrospective propensity score-matched analysis conducted. Consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy without the double stapling technique between January 2018 and June 2021 were investigated. The main outcome was overall postoperative complications within 30 days after the procedure. The authors also performed a sub-analysis of the postoperative results of ileocolic anastomosis and colocolic anastomosis, respectively. A total of 283 patients were initially extracted; after propensity score matching, there were 113 patients in each of the IA and EA groups. There were no differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. The IA group had a significantly longer operative time than the EA group (208 vs. 183 min, P =0.001). The rate of overall postoperative complications was significantly lower in the IA group ( n =18, 15.9%) than in the EA group ( n =34, 30.1%; P =0.02), especially in colocolic anastomosis after left-sided colectomy (IA: 23.8% vs. EA: 59.1%; P =0.03). Postoperative inflammatory marker levels were significantly higher in the IA group on postoperative day 1 but not on postoperative day 7. There was no difference in the postoperative lengths of hospital stay between the two groups, and no deaths occurred. The data suggest that performing IA during laparoscopic colectomy can potentially reduce the risk of postoperative complications, especially in colocolic anastomosis after left-sided colectomy.

Robotic-assisted rectosigmoid resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE): technical notes, short-term results, and functional outcome

Rectosigmoid resection rectopexy has been established as an effective therapy for obstructive defecation syndrome. The addition of the NOSE-technique provides an even less invasive approach avoiding minilaparotomy, but can be technically challenging. Application of a robotic platform has been proposed to facilitate the specimen extraction and fashioning of the intracorporeal anastomosis and has been proven to be effective in left-sided colectomies. After establishing laparoscopic rectosigmoid-resection-rectopexy with NOSE, we modified our technique by addition of the robotic platform. Whenever robotic capacity was available, elective patients scheduled for rectosigmoid resection rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome were operated robotically assisted. Demographic and intraoperative data were prospectively collected. Follow up was assessed using the Wexner constipation score, Wexner incontinence score, and Altomare ODS score. The NOSE-RRR technique was completed in all 31 patients. The mean operative time was 166 min (range 67-230). No conversion was required. The median hospital stay was 5 days (range 3-28). Four patients had minor complications (Clavien I). Two patients were reoperated (Clavien IIIb). Functional scores improved significantly postoperatively. Mean Wexner incontinence score was 7.1 preoperatively, 6.9 after 1 month, and decreased significantly to 3.93 after 3 months (p < 0.001). Mean Altomare ODS score was 17.47 preoperatively and 6.93/5.03 after 1/3 months (p < 0.001). Wexner constipation score (12.83) also showed a significant improvement after 1/3 months (6.97/6.67; p < 0.001). NOSE-RRR can be performed safely with a low rate of manageable complications. The technique provides a significant improvement for ODS-Symptoms.

Impact of Frailty Upon Surgical Decision-Making for Left-Sided Colon Cancer.

Background: Frailty is characterized by reduced physiologic reserve, and for patients with colon cancer, frailty is associated with increased morbidity after resection. One commonly cited reason for performing an end colostomy vs a primary anastomosis in left-sided colon cancer is the belief that frail patients do not have the physiologic reserve to withstand the morbidity associated with an anastomotic leak. We explored the impact of frailty on the type of operation performed in patients with left-sided colon cancer. Methods: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for patients with colon cancer who underwent a left-sided colectomy from 2016 to 2018. Patients were categorized using the modified 5-item frailty index. Multivariate regression was used to identify independent predictors of complications and type of operation performed. Results: Of 17,461 patients, 20.7% were considered frail. Frail patients received an end colostomy more often than nonfrail patients (11.3% vs 9.6%, P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, frailty was a significant predictor for total medical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.29-1.63) and readmission (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77) but was not independently associated with organ space surgical site infections or reoperation. Frailty was independently associated with receiving an end colostomy vs a primary anastomosis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.44), but an end colostomy did not decrease the risk of reoperation or organ space surgical site infections. Conclusion: Frail patients with left-sided colon cancer are more likely to receive an end colostomy, but an end colostomy does not lower the risk of reoperation or organ space surgical site infections. Based on these results, frailty alone should not prompt the decision to perform an end colostomy, but further studies are needed to guide surgical decision-making in this understudied population.

Preoperative tumor marking with indocyanine green prior of robotic colorectal resections.

This prospective case-series study aimed to assess the usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic marking of colorectal tumors using Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence in patients that underwent robotic surgical colorectal resections. Consecutive patients that were eligible for colorectal resection with intent to cure in a single hospital (Athens Medical Center), from February 2022 to June 2022, were included. ICG solution was injected into the submucosal layer at 2 opposite sites (180 degrees apart) distal to the tumor, without submucosal elevation. Identification of the tumor marking was then performed after switching to near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence mode. During the robotic procedure, qualitative evaluation of fluorescence was performed by the surgical team (primary surgeon, first assistant, second assistant, research fellow). All 10 patients underwent robotic surgical approach and operations included right-sided colectomy (n = 1), left-sided colectomy (n = 6) and low anterior resection (n = 3). Visualisation of this dye with near-infrared light was very clear with bright intensity in all patients when the marking was performed one day prior of surgery. Preoperative tumor marking with ICG was identified intraoperatively in all cases and the techinque was easily reproducible.

Validation of a left-sided colectomy anastomotic leak risk score and assessment of diversion practices

BackgroundA left-sided anastomotic leak risk score was previously developed and internally but not externally validated. MethodsLeft-sided colectomy anastomotic leak risk scores were calculated for patients within the ACS NSQIP Colectomy Targeted PUF from 2017 to 2018 and institutional NSQIP databases at three hospitals from 2011 to 2019. The calibration and discrimination of the risk score was assessed. ResultsA total of 21,116 patients (ACS NSQIP) and 485 patients (institutional NSQIP) were identified. Anastomotic leak rate was 2.8% and 2.9% respectively. C-statistic in the ACS NSQIP cohort was 0.61 and 0.64 in the institutional cohort compared to 0.66 in the original development cohort. Strong visual correspondence existed between predicted and observed anastomotic leak rates in the ACS NSQIP cohort. ConclusionsThe left-sided anastomotic leak risk score was validated in two new populations. Use of the score would aid in the decision of when to perform a diverting stoma.

Localizing ureteral catheters for left-sided colectomy and proctectomy: Do the risks justify the benefits?

Localizing ureteral catheters for left-sided colectomy and proctectomy: Do the risks justify the benefits?

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies: intra- and postoperative outcomes of 683 patients

BackgroundRobotic-assisted colorectal surgery has gained more and more popularity over the last years. It seems to be advantageous to laparoscopic surgery in selected situations, especially in confined regions like a narrow male pelvis in rectal surgery. Whether robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies can serve as safe training operations for less frequent, low anterior resections for rectal cancer is still under debate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate intra- and postoperative results of robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) compared to laparoscopic (LSC) surgery in left-sided colectomies.MethodsBetween June 2015 and December 2019, 683 patients undergoing minimally invasive left-sided colectomies in two Swiss, high-volume colorectal centers were included. Intra- and postoperative outcome parameters were collected and analyzed.ResultsA total of 179 patients undergoing RAL and 504 patients undergoing LSC were analyzed. Baseline characteristics showed similar results. Intraoperative complications occurred in 0.6% of RAL and 2.0% of LSC patients (p = 0.193). Differences in postoperative complications graded Dindo ≥ 3 were not statistically significant (RAL 3.9% vs. LSC 6.3%, p = 0.227). Occurrence of anastomotic leakages showed no statistically significant difference [RAL n = 2 (1.1%), LSC n = 8 (1.6%), p = 0.653]. Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. Conversions to open surgery were significantly higher in the LSC group (6.2% vs.1.7%, p = 0.018), while stoma formation was similar in both groups [RAL n = 1 (0.6%), LSC n = 5 (1.0%), p = 0.594]. Operative time was longer in the RAL group (300 vs. 210.0 min, p < 0.001).ConclusionRobotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies are safe and feasible compared to laparoscopic resections. Intra- and postoperative complications are similar in both groups. Most notably, the rate of anastomotic leakages is similar. Compared to laparoscopic resections, the analyzed robotic-assisted resections have longer operative times but less conversion rates. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety of robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies as training procedures for low anterior resections.

Localizing ureteral catheters for left-sided colectomy and proctectomy: Do the risks justify the benefits?

BackgroundThe role of ureteral catheters in left-sided colectomies and proctectomies remains debated. Given the rarity of ureteral injury, prior retrospective studies were underpowered to detect potentially small, but meaningful differences. This study seeks to determine the role and morbidity of ureteral catheters in left-sided colectomy and proctectomy using a large, national database. MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Project from 2012 to 2018 was queried. Left-sided colectomies or proctectomies were included. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Results8419 patients with ureteral catherization and 128,021 patients without catheterization were included. After matching, there was not a significant difference in ureteral injury between the groups (0.7% with vs 0.9% without, p = 0.07). Ureteral catheters were associated with increased overall morbidity and longer operative time. Increasing body mass index, operations for diverticular disease, conversion to open, T4 disease and increasing operative complexity were associated with ureteral injury (p < 0.01 for all). ConclusionsUreteral catheterization was not associated with decreased rates of ureteral injury when including all left-sided colectomies. High-risk patients for ureteral injury include those with obesity, diverticular disease, and conversion to open. Selective ureteral catheterization may be warranted in these settings.

Analysis of Perioperative Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection After a Colectomy.

IntroductionThe removal of the terminal ileum may interfere with gut-associated lymphoid tissue function, reduce bile salt reabsorption, and change intraluminal pH, which may contribute to the development of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after ileocolic resections. Therefore, we compared CDI incidence among patients who underwent a colectomy with or without removal of the terminal ileum.MethodsUsing the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy database, we identified 17,962 patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy without removal of the terminal ileum and 5,929 patients who underwent an ileocolic resection involving the removal of the terminal ileum. Patients who underwent an emergency operation or had enterocolitis as the indication for surgery were excluded.ResultsPatients who underwent an ileocolic resection developed higher rates of postoperative CDI than those who underwent a left hemicolectomy (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that removing the ileum was associated with a 50% higher risk of developing CDI than patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy. Additional risk factors for developing postoperative CDI were advanced age (p=0.001) and mechanical bowel preparation (p=0.001). On the other hand, factors independently associated with a lower risk of postoperative CDI were male gender (p<0.001), preoperative oral antibiotics (p<0.001), and preoperative chemotherapy use within 90 days (p<0.013).ConclusionOverall, patients who undergo operations involving the removal of the ileum are at higher risk for developing CDI. To reduce the risk among these patients, we suggest employing preoperative oral antibiotics in part of bowel preparation. Furthermore, it is critical to maintain hygienic measures, such as handwashing and disinfecting surfaces, and attentive care for these patients.

The necessity of intensive surveillance colonoscopy for patients with a remaining right colon after resection of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

To clarify how often postoperative surveillance colonoscopy should be undertaken based on the risk factors for the development of metachronous cancer (MC) and advanced adenoma (AA) after surgery for colorectal cancer. We collected data of consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2012, with preoperative colonoscopy and surveillance colonoscopy at 1year after surgery (406 patients, mean age: 69years, 59% male). The detection rates of AA (with villous features, > 10mm or high-grade dysplasia) and MC by surveillance colonoscopy were the primary outcomes. At 5years, colonoscopy was performed as postoperative surveillance an average of 3.2 times. AA and MC were detected in 57 (14.0%) and 18 patients (4.4%), respectively. Both lesions were more common in the right colon (n = 43) than in the left colon (n = 28). The detection rate did not differ to a statistically significant extent according to the number of colonoscopies performed for surveillance (p = 0.21). However, after left-sided colectomy, both types of lesions were more commonly detected in those who received ≥ 3 colonoscopies than in those with one or two colonoscopies (p = 0.04). A remaining right colon after left-sided colectomy was associated with a higher risk of developing AA and MC. Physicians should consider performing surveillance colonoscopy more frequently if the right colon remains after surgery.

Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis.

PurposeTo estimate the cost impact of using the ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler (ECP) compared with manual circular staplers (standard of care, SOC) among patients undergoing colectomy procedures that involve left-sided anastomosis.MethodsA US hospital-based budget impact model was developed to estimate the impact of ECP in reducing the surgical complication of anastomotic leak. The incremental acquisition cost of ECP vs SOC was compared to the net potential savings from reduced complication costs. The model was based on complication rates from a recently published matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) that compared clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes of patients using ECP with those of a propensity score-matched retrospective SOC control cohort from a real-world clinical practice population. The model assessed total cost, average length of stay (LOS), proportion of patients with a non-home discharge, and all-cause readmission. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model assumptions and inputs.ResultsDespite a higher device cost of $412 for ECP compared with $298 for a manual stapler, annual savings due to avoided complications with ECP was $53,987 for anastomotic leak, assuming 100 procedures per year with each type of circular stapler. ECP also helped to avoid 27 LOS days, 0.38 readmissions and 0.22 non-home discharges. Sensitivity analyses around potential drivers of costs established the robustness of economic savings with the use of ECP – with annual savings being most impacted by the probability of anastomotic leak complication in the DSA.ConclusionThis model demonstrates that among patients undergoing left-sided colectomy procedures, the incremental cost of using the ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler instead of a manual circular stapler was offset by the savings from lowered incidence and cost of management of anastomotic leaks in the hospital setting.

Efficacy of intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation for preventing anastomotic leakage after left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Intestinal perfusion at the anastomotic site is thought to be one of the most influential risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL). We evaluated the efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging at the stump of the proximal colon in left-sided colectomy or rectal resection in terms of decreasing the incidence of AL. Prospectively collected data were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent left-sided colectomy or rectal resection were enrolled (ICG group; n = 197), and patients who had undergone a similar procedure before the ICG group were enrolled from the charts as historical controls (HC group; n = 187). After ICG evaluation, anastomosis was performed where fluorescence was sufficient. The incidence of AL was compared between the ICG and HC groups. Propensity score (PS)-matched data were analyzed to clarify the risk of AL. AL occurred in 6 patients (3.3%) in the ICG group and 17 (10.7%) in the HC group. ICG evaluation revealed 179 patients with good fluorescence and 18 with poor/none perfusion (9.1%). The transection line was changed in all patients with poor/none fluorescence. Three of these 18 patients developed AL (16.7%), though transection line was changed at which is thought to be good. We hope AL in poor/none fluorescence can be prevented at the same rate of cases with good fluorescence. Actually, the rate of that was significantly higher compared with good fluorescence patients (P = 0.038). 93 patients in each group were compared by PS-matched data analysis, which showed the AL rate in the ICG group was significantly lower than that in the HC group (3.2% vs 10.8%, respectively; P = 0.046). Even though this study has limitations of comparison of data prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation could significantly decrease the incidence of AL.

Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study

BackgroundSingle incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and single incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are both advanced minimally invasive operative techniques. However, studies comparing these two surgical methods have not been published. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the short-term outcomes of SIRC with those of SILC. MethodsA total of 21 consecutive patients underwent SIRC and 136 consecutive patients underwent SILC in separate institutes between January 2013 and December 2019. We used retrospective cohort matching to analyze these patients. ResultsPrior to matching, patients who underwent SIRC had a lower percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades III–IV (5% vs. 19%, P = 0.11) compared with patients who underwent SILC. The SIRC group revealed a higher proportion of sigmoid colon lesions and anterior resections than the SILC group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.16). After 1:4 cohort matching, 21 patients were enrolled in the SIRC group and 84 patients were enrolled in the SILC group. No statistically significant difference in terms of operative time (SIRC: 185 ± 46 min, SILC: 208 ± 53 min; P = 0.51), estimated blood loss (SIRC: 12 ± 22 ml, SILC: 85 ± 234 ml; P = 0.12), and complications (SIRC: 4.7%, SIRC: 7.1%; P = 0.31) was observed between these groups. Length of postoperative hospital stay (SIRC: 8.3 ± 1.7 days, SILC: 9.3 ± 6.5; P = 0.10) and number of harvested lymph nodes (SIRC: 21.3 ± 10.3, SILC: 21.3 ± 9.5; P = 0.77) were also similar between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, numbers of harvested lymph node is less in SIRC than SILC (SIRC: 18.1 ± 4.7 vs. SILC: 18.9 ± 8.1, P = 0.04) in anterior resection. ConclusionSIRC and SILC are safe and feasible procedures with similar surgical and pathological outcomes for right- and left-side colectomy.

Intraoperative Colonoscopy During Colorectal Surgery Does Not Increase Postoperative Complications: An Assessment From the ACS-NSQIP Procedure-targeted Cohort.

Intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) is an adjunct in colorectal surgery to detect the location of the lesions and assessing anastomotic integrity. The authors aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility and postoperative morbidity of IOC in left-sided colectomy patients for colorectal cancer. Patients undergoing elective left-sided colectomy without any proximal diversion for colorectal cancer between 2013 and 2016 were reviewed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted database. Demographics, comorbidities, short-term outcomes, and postoperative morbidity of patients were evaluated. A total of 8811 patients were identified and IOC was performed for 1143 (12.97%) patients. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the IOC and non-IOC groups. Patients with IOC had shorter total hospital length of stay. The use of IOC does not adversely affect short-term outcomes after colorectal resections. Surgeons may utilize IOC liberally for left-sided colorectal resections.

Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundCircular staplers perform a critical function for creation of anastomoses in colorectal surgeries. Powered stapling systems allow for reduced force required by surgeons to fire the device and may provide advantages for creating a secure anastomosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel circular powered stapler in a post-market setting, during left-sided colectomy procedures. Materials and methodsConsecutive subjects underwent left-sided colorectal resections that included anastomosis performed with the ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler (ECP). The primary endpoint was the frequency in which a stapler performance issue was observed. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of ease of use of the device via a surgeon satisfaction questionnaire, and monitoring/recording of procedure-related adverse events (AEs). ResultsA total of 168 anastomoses were performed with the ECP. Surgical approaches included robotic-assisted (n = 74, 44.0%), laparoscopic (n = 71, 42.3%), open (n = 20, 11.9%), and hand-assisted minimally invasive (n = 3, 1.8%) procedures. There were 22 occurrences of device performance issues in 20 (11.9%) subjects during surgery. No positive intraoperative leak tests were observed, and only 1 issue was related to a procedure-related AE or surgical complication, which was an instance of incomplete surgical donut necessitating re-anastomosis. Postoperative anastomotic leaks were experienced in 4 (2.4%) subjects. Clavien-Dindo classification of all AEs indicated that 92.0% were Grades I or II. Participating surgeons rated the ECP as easier to use compared to previously used manual circular staplers in 85.7% of procedures. ConclusionThe circular powered stapler exhibited few clinically relevant performance issues, an overall favorable safety profile, and ease of use for creation of left-sided colon anastomoses.

Indocyanine green fluorescent imaging on anastomotic leakage in colectomies: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

The usage of indocyanine green (ICG) dye is commonly associated with decreased anastomotic leakage rates in colectomies. This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis to assess the usage of ICG fluorescence imaging in right-sided colectomies. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Trials, CNKI, and WanFang electronic databases were reviewed, and meta-analysis of proportions, comparative meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis were conducted in this review. Studies comparing ICG usage with conventional approaches of anastomosis were selected, with postoperative anastomotic leak rate being the primary outcome. Ten articles were included, with a total of 675 patients involved, of which 515 patients underwent colorectal surgery with ICG. Anastomotic leak rates with ICG were estimated to be 1% (CI 0.00-0.04) and 3% (CI 0.01-0.06) for right and left procedures, respectively. No significant difference was observed in left-sided colectomies (OR 0.587; 95% CI 0.218-1.582; p = 0.292). There were nearly half the odds of anastomotic leakage when ICG was used in right-sided colectomies (OR 0.524; 95% CI 0.128-2.137). With the ability to potentially avert postoperative anastomotic leakage, coupled with its minimal costs and side effects, administration of ICG in colectomies in centers where equipment is available should be encouraged.

Short-term efficacy of totally laparoscopic left colon cancer radical resection with overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis technique

Objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and short-term efficacy of totally laparoscopic left colectomy for left colon cancer by using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis technique for digestive tract reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect the clinical data of 86 patients with left colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery in Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from October, 2017 to February, 2019. The patients were divided into totally laparoscopic left-sided colectomy (TLLC) (treatment group, n=25 cases) and laparoscopic-assisted left-sided colectomy (LALC) (control group, n=61 cases). The intraoperative and postoperative data were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no surgical-related deaths in both groups. All the patients in the TLLC group underwent laparoscopic resection, while one patient in the LALC group transfer to open surgery. The operation time in TLLC group and LALC group were (164.5±42.3) min and (171.0±43.1) min, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P=0.516). However, the intraoperative blood loss of patients in the TLLC group was (36.4±22.7) ml, which was significantly less than (52.9±32.2) ml in the LALC group (P=0.026). The anastomosis time in the TLLC group was (39.1±6.5) min, which was significantly longer than (24.9±5.4) min in the LALC group (P<0.001). Postoperative exhaust time in the TLLC group was (2.6±0.5) days, which was significantly shorter than (3.3±0.8) days in the LALC group (P<0.001). The incision length in the TLLC group was (4.2±2.2) cm, significantly shorter than (7.0±2.5) cm in the LALC group (P<0.001). The length of the resected bowel was (21.0±7.3) cm in the TLLC group, which was significantly longer than (17.5±5.4) cm in the LALC group (P=0.037). The length of hospital stay in the TLLC group was (6.2±1.9) days, which was significantly shorter than (7.9±1.5) days in the LALC group (P<0.001). The incidences of postoperative complications in the TLLC group and LALC group were 0 and 4.9% (3/61), respectively, without statistically significant (P=0.553). No anastomotic complications occurred in both groups. During the follow-up period, neither group of patients was hospitalized again, and no tumor metastasis or recurrence occurred. Conclusions: It is safe and feasible to apply the TLLC with overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis in patients with left colon cancer. It has better short-term effects such as shorter incisions, faster recovery, and shorter postoperative hospital stays, and is worthy of further promotion.