Left Atrial Spontaneous Echo Contrast Research Articles

Predictive indicators in peripheral blood and left atrium blood for left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in atrial fibrillation patients

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to demonstrate the discriminating predictive indicators in peripheral blood and left atrium blood for predicting the risk of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) in atrial fibrillation patients underwent catheter ablation.MethodsA total of 108 consecutive AF patients treated with radiofrequency ablation between July 2022 and July 2023 were enrolled and divided into two groups based on preprocedural transesophageal echocardiography: the non LASEC group (n = 71) and the LASEC group (n = 37). Circulating platelet and endothelial- derived MPs (PMPs and EMPs) in peripheral blood and left atrial blood were detected. Plasma soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) were observed. Diagnostic efficiency was measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsPeripheral sP-selectin, vWF and EMPs expressions elevated in all subjects when compared to those in left atrium blood. Levels of sP-selectin and vWF were significantly higher in peripheral blood of LASEC group than those of non LASEC group (p = 0.0018,p = 0.0271). Significant accumulations of peripheral PMPs and EMPs were documented in LASEC group by comparison with non LASEC group (p = 0.0395,p = 0.018). The area under curve(AUC) of combined PMPs and sP-selectin in predicting LASEC was 0.769 (95%CI: 0.678–0.845, sensitivity: 86.49%, specificity: 59.15%), significantly larger than PMPs or sP-selectin alone.ConclusionsExpressions of PMPs, sP-selectin, EMPs and vWF Increased in NVAF patients with LASEC and that might be potential biomarkers for LASEC prediction.

The presence of spontaneous echo contrast didn't increase the risk for left atrial appendage closure: A propensity score matching analysis based on the CLACBAC study

BackgroundLeft atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was effective in preventing thromboembolic events and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LA-SEC) poses a higher risk for thromboembolism is contradictory. We aimed to investigate whether LA-SEC is a risk factor for thromboembolic events in patients who underwent LAAC. Methods258 consecutive patients who underwent successful LAAC were enrolled and divided according to the presence or absence of LA-SEC detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate covariate imbalances. Baseline characteristics, periprocedural details, and clinical outcomes were compared between LA-SEC and non-LA-SEC groups and PSM-matched groups. ResultsOf the 258 patients enrolled, mean age was 71.8 ± 8.3 years and 59.3 % were male. LA-SEC group had a higher percentage of persistent AF and worse cardiac function. No significant difference in peri-procedure parameters was found. Through follow-up of 38.1 ± 10.7 months, the total incidence of thromboembolic events and stroke was 7.8 % and 6.6 %, respectively. Though the event-free survival rate of thromboembolic events (Log-Rank P = 0.042) and stroke (Log-Rank P = 0.010) was significantly lower in the LA-SEC group, multivariable COX regression analysis showed LA-SEC was not an independent predictor of thromboembolic events (Hazard ratio 2.073, 95 % Confidence interval 0.845–5.082, P = 0.111). Further survival analysis between PSM-matched groups with comparable baseline characteristics presented no significant difference in survival free from thromboembolic events (Log-Rank P = 0.616) and stroke (Log-Rank P = 0.312). ConclusionPatients with LA-SEC had worse condition, while LA-SEC per se did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events and stroke for patients who underwent LAAC.

Relationship of inflammatory indices with left atrial appendage thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Inflammatory indices derived from complete blood tests have been reported to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The data about the relationship between inflammatory indices and left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) or dense spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) are limited. To explore the value of inflammatory indices for predicting the presence of LAAT or dense SEC in nonvalvular AF patients. A total of 406 patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography were included and divided into two groups based on the presence (study group) or absence (control group) of LAAT or dense SEC. Inflammatory indices, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), were calculated from complete blood analysis. The associations of inflammatory indices with LAAT/dense SEC were analyzed using logistic regression. LAAT and dense SEC were detected in 11 (2.7%) and 42 (10.3%) patients, respectively. The PLR only showed an association with LAAT/dense SEC in the univariate model. Elevated NLR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.98, P = 0.007) and reduced LMR (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.41-0.83, P = 0.003) were found to be independent risk factors for the presence of LAAT/dense SEC. The areas under the NLR and LMR curves for predicting LAAT/dense SEC were 0.73 (95%CI: 0.66-0.80, P < 0.001) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.65-0.81, P < 0.001), respectively, while the cutoff values were 2.8 (sensitivity: 69.8%; specificity: 64.0%) and 2.4 (sensitivity: 71.7%; specificity: 60.6%), respectively. Increased NLR and decreased LMR may predict LAAT/dense SEC in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Assessment of Coagulation Factors in Patients with Severe Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis in Sinus Rhythm with Left Atrial Appendage Inactivity

BackgroundPatients with severe mitral stenosis (MS) in normal sinus rhythm (NSR), presenting with left atrial appendage (LAA) inactivity and associated left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) are prone to left atrium (LA) or LAA thrombus formation. But unlike for atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulants are not commonly prescribed for this patient subset. This study aimed to compare the levels of procoagulants and fibrinogen in both local (LA) and systemic contexts between patients with severe MS in NSR vs those in healthy control subjects. MethodsThe study involved 35 patients with severe MS in NSR with LAA inactivity and LASEC who were eligible for balloon mitral valvuloplasty vs 35 healthy controls. All patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography to assess MS severity, LAA activity, and LASEC grade, and had blood samples analyzed for procoagulant levels. ResultsResults showed comparable baseline characteristics between groups, with most patients in the New York Heart Association II or III functional classes, and with varying LASEC grades. Patients exhibited significantly higher levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 [patient vs control, 9017 pg/mL (6228.0-10,963.5) vs 1790 pg/mL (842.3-2712), P < 0.0001], thrombin-antithrombin III [patient vs control, 39 ng/mL (5.45-74.85) vs 2.80 ng/mL (1.6-6.5), P < 0.0001], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (patients vs controls, 26.09 ± 8.18 ng/mL vs 8.05 ± 3.53 ng/mL, P < 0.0001), and fibrinogen (3.48 ± 0.89 g/L vs 3.01 ± 0.53 g/L, P = 0.029) in the LA of patients, compared to those in control subjects. Systemic procoagulant levels also were elevated in patients, but D-dimer levels were similar between the 2 groups. ConclusionsThe findings suggest a hypercoagulable state in patients, similar to that in patients with atrial fibrillation. The study advocates for consideration of use of oral anticoagulants in these patients until LA and LAA function improves, to mitigate thrombus formation.

A gray zone: Role of transesophageal echocardiography before atrial tachycardia catheter ablation.

There is a lack of studies in the literature directly investigating the relationship between atrial tachycardia (AT) and left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus, and current guidelines do not provide strong recommendations regarding the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before AT catheter ablation. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between AT and the presence of LA/LAA thrombus and contribute to the literature on the use of TEE before AT catheter ablation. This single-center retrospective observational study screened patients who underwent TEE between February 10, 2019, and February 10, 2023. Patients were assigned to the AT patient and control groups. TEE was conducted to exclude thrombus in the AT ablation group. The control group included patients who underwent TEE for interatrial septum evaluation and had LA imaging during TEE but did not have atrial arrhythmia. To mitigate bias between the AT patient group and the control group, they were randomized 1:1 using propensity-score matching (PSM). Following randomization, each group consisted of 49 patients. All analyses were conducted after PSM. There were no statistically significant differences between the AT patient and control groups in terms of baseline clinical characteristics and echocardiographic features. Additionally, no significant differences were found between the blood viscosities calculated at low and high shear rates in both groups. The study revealed a significant difference between the two groups in the presence of LA spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) (24.5% in AT group vs 0% in Control group, p = .001), but not in the presence of thrombi (8.2% in AT group vs 0% in Control group, p = .117). Compared to the control group, the presence of SEC was significantly higher in the AT patient group. The increased frequency of SEC in AT patients suggests the hypothesis that AT may contribute to LA stasis. The routine use of TEE before AT catheter ablation remains controversial, despite the presence of LA thrombus and SEC in the AT patient group. The clinical assessment of thrombus presence before the procedure must be conducted on a patient-specific basis.

Clinical and instrumental factors associated with sinus rhythm maintenance following direct current cardioversion of late persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation at 6-months follow-up

Abstract Purpose To study the clinical and instrumental factors, associated with sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance following direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in patients with late persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at 6-months follow-up. Methods The cohort single-center study analyzed clinical and instrumental data from 59 late persistent AF patients (with duration of its episode ≥90 days [up to 12 months]), who underwent an elective DCCV. At 6-months follow-up, 32 (54 %%) patients succeeded to maintain SR, in contrast to 27 (46 %) patients with a failure to its maintenance. Results The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed, that the absence of heart failure (HF) stage C (i.e., the presence of its stage B), the higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (by transthoracic echocardiography [TTE]), left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAAFV) &amp;gt;40 cm/s and the freedom from left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) (by transesophageal echocardiography), ‒ all were associated with the higher chance to maintain SR at 6-months follow-up (Figure). At the same time, the higher baseline left atrial dimension (LAD) and more advanced pulmonary hypertension (PH) (by TTE) were associated with the failure of its maintenance to be more probable (Figure). At multivariate analysis, the following predictors of SR maintenance after DCCV at 6-months follow-up were identified: higher LVEF (OR 1,07 (95 % CI 1,01-1,13); р=0,021); LAAFV &amp;gt;40 cm/s (OR 4,33 (95 % CI 1,06-17,78); р=0,042), and less advanced PH (OR 0,24 (95% CI 0,06-0,93); р=0,038). Conclusion Better LV systolic function, LAAFV &amp;gt;40 cm/s and less advanced PH were the predictors of SR maintenance following DCCV in patients with late persistent (with duration of its episode ≥90 days) non-valvular AF at 6-months follow-up.

Prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast on transesophageal echocardiography in patients scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation.

To avoid causing a thromboembolic event in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), patients are treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) prior to the procedure. Despite being on anticoagulants, some patients develop a left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT). To exclude the presence of LAAT, transesophageal ultrasound (TEE) is performed in all patients prior to the procedure. We hypothesized continuous treatment with anticoagulants would result in a low prevalence of LAAT, in patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score. Medical records of consecutive patients planned to undergo AF ablation at Lund University Hospital during the years 2018-2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Examination protocols from transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography were examined for LAAT and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC). Patients with LAAT and SEC were compared to patients without using Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson Chi-squared analysis to test for correlation. Of 553 patients, three patients (0.54%) had LAAT, and 18 (3.25%) had spontaneous contrast (SEC). Patients with LAAT or SEC had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, more often presented in AF at TEE and less often had a normal sized left atrium. There is a low prevalence of LAAT and SEC in patients with AF scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation. Patients with SEC or LAAT tend to have paroxysmal AF less often and more often presented in AF at admission. No patients with CHA2DS2-VASc 0, paroxysmal AF, normal sized left atrium and sinus rhythm at TEE were found to have LAAT or SEC.

A patient with atrial fibrillation and grade III left atrial spontaneous echo contrast after borreliosis. Case report

In the presented case report, a patient with persistent atrial fibrillation developed due to borreliosis and grade III left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) according to transesophageal echocardiography, in order to rule out intracardiac thrombosis and concomitant Lyme carditis, contrastenhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Given the rapid progression of heart failure on the background of tachycardia, the lack of evidence for left atrial appendage thrombosis and myocarditis, electrical cardioversion was performed with the restoration of sinus rhythm and without thromboembolic complications during further follow-up. The issues of the clinical and prognostic significance of SEC, the potential of various diagnostic methods, and the management of such patients are discussed.

Why Does Rivaroxaban Not Work in Severe Mitral Stenosis?

Mitral stenosis is not a rare disease. Rheumatic fever is the principal cause of mitral stenosis. Anulus calcification and congenital heart disease are recognized as other causes of mitral stenosis.[1] In developed countries, the prevalence is approximately 0.6 in 1,000 in the United States, but it is much higher in developing nations: 21 cases per 1,000 in Asia, 15 cases per 1,000 in Africa, and 17 cases per 1,000 in South America.[2] Atrial fibrillation occurs in approximately 32% of symptomatic patients, thus decreasing cardiac output and exercise capacity, and greatly increasing the risk of thromboembolism.[3] Oral anticoagulation is therefore mandatory in these patients. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been found to be noninferior or superior versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g., warfarin) in preventing cardioembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation,[4] patients with atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease were not enrolled in earlier trials, thus excluding this pathological condition from approved indications.[5] Since ensuring adequate anticoagulation with laboratory monitoring while using VKAs may be difficult in developing countries, DOACs have the potential to improve the extension of oral anticoagulation without the need of any laboratory control. The commitment to plan a superiority trial (DOAC vs. VKA) came in 2016 from the cardiology community, which aimed to design a superiority trial involving a single-dose DOAC (no laboratory monitoring) versus VKA (with laboratory monitoring), and since the latter showed a poor time in the therapeutic range in countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.[6] Thus, a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, in comparison with VKA was planned and recently completed (INVICTUS trial). The trial involved patients with rheumatic heart disease from Africa, Asia, and Latin America,[7] enrolling patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease. Eighty-five percent of trial participants had mitral-valve stenosis, which was moderate-to-severe in 82%. These participants had a CHA2DS2VASc score of at least 2, a mitral-valve area of no more than 2 cm2, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), or left atrial thrombus. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard doses of rivaroxaban (20 mg/day) or dose-adjusted VKA (INR: 2.0–3.0). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of follow-up was 3.1 ± 1.2 years. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular (cardiac or noncardiac) or unknown causes. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH).[8] A total of 4,531 participants were included in the final analysis. Mean age of the patients (72.3% women) was 50.5 years.

Associations between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio with left atrial spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThe importance of inflammation in thrombosis is increasingly appreciated. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) are important indicators of systemic inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the associations between NLR and MHR with left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.MethodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study enrolled 569 consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent risk factors of LAAT/SEC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of NLR and MHR in predicting LAAT/SEC. Subgroup and Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess the correlations between NLR and MHR with the CHA2DS2-VASc score.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NLR (OR: 1.49; 95%CI: 1.173–1.892) and MHR (OR: 2.951; 95%CI: 1.045–8.336) were independent risk factors for LAAT/SEC. The area under the ROC curve of NLR (0.639) and MHR (0.626) was similar to that of the CHADS2 score (0.660) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.637). Subgroup and Pearson correlation analyses showed significant but very weak associations between NLR (r = 0.139, P < 0.05) and MHR (r = 0.095, P < 0.05) with the CHA2DS2-VASc score.ConclusionGenerally, NLR and MHR are independent risk factors for predicting LAAT/SEC in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The value of left atrial longitudinal strain in evaluating left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) observed in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a reliable predictor of the risk of future ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Left atrial strain globally reflects atrial function, remodeling and distensibility. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a myogenic remnant of the left atrium, which can actively relax and contract. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is an important part of releasing the pressure of the left atrium. The key role of the left atrium is to regulate the left ventricular filling pressure, act as a reservoir for pulmonary venous return during ventricular contraction, and act as a conduit, transferring blood to the Left ventricle during early ventricular diastole. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between left atrial function and left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast (LAASEC). A retrospective study of 338 patients with non-valvular AF was conducted. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography provided the following metrics of LA strain: LA strain during the reservoir phase (LASr), LA strain during the conduit phase (LAScd). LA or LAA has the dense SEC of more than grade 3, which is defined as mud like change or pre thrombosis. Patients with level 3 SEC (n = 81) has lower LASr than those with lower grades of SEC (n = 257) (7.20 ± 3.70 vs. 17.48 ± 8.67, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that the type of atrial fibrillation (persistent∼), increased heart rate, decreased LASr were independently associated with the dense LAASEC (OR (CI 95%), 5.558 (1.618-19.09), 1.016 (1.006-1.026) 0.002, 1.224 (1.085-1.381), both P < 0.01). Venn Diagram showed that lower CHADVASC2 score groups had dense SEC cases. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for analyzing results and selecting cut off values. The cut off point for LASr < 8.85% and CHADVASC2 score was >2 scores with sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 85%. Lower LASr is independently associated with the dense LAASEC in NVAF and has incremental values superior to clinical scores. The decrease of LASr may be a potential non-invasive parameter for evaluating the higher risk of LAA thrombosis.

Severe Left Atrial Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Characteristics and Impact on Ischemic Risk Postablation.

Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) is an important precursor for intracardiac thrombus and stroke. There are very limited data on characteristics of severe SEC and its impact on ischemic risk of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Transesophageal echocardiography files were reviewed between March 2009 and March 2021 in this monocentric retrospective study. SEC was classified into four levels. The primary endpoint was thromboembolic event (stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and ensuing death), and the secondary endpoint included nonischemic mortality and recurrent atrial arrhythmia. Six hundred SEC cases were enrolled and classified into mild SEC group (Grade 1-2, n = 515) and severe SEC group (Grade 3-4, n = 85). Independent risk factors for severe SEC included higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and LAd/∆LVED (LAd = left atrial diameter; ∆LVED = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter - left ventricular end-systolic diameter). The severe SEC group had a higher peri-procedural ischemic event occurrence (7.1 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.007). At a median follow-up of 55 months, the severe SEC group had a lower freedom rate from ischemic events (90.1 vs. 75.3%, p < 0.001); older age and severe SEC were independent risk factors for ischemic events. In patients undergoing redo-procedure (n = 100), a remarkably reduced ESR (17.8 ± 12.0 vs. 28.2 ± 19.0 mm/h, p < 0.001) was observed in patients whose SEC disappeared. Higher BNP, ESR, and LAd/∆LVED were the independent predictors for severe SEC. Severe SEC was associated with higher peri-procedural and long-term ischemic risks. ESR and LAd/∆LVED, as indicators of hematological and hemodynamic change, seemed helpful in identifying NVAF patients prone to developing severe SEC.

Predictors of sinus rhythm restoration in patients with long-term episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation

The aim – to compare clinical, laboratory and instrumental characteristics of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and duration of AF episode ≥ 90 days, undergoing direct current (DC) cardioversion, in groups with or without further sinus rhythm (SR) restoration, for the purpose of determining the predictors of SR restoration.Materials and methods. The cohort single-center study analyzed clinical, laboratory and instrumental data from 115 persistent AF patients with duration of its episode ≥ 90 days, who underwent an elective direct current cardioversion. Patients were subdivided into the groups depending on SR restoration effectiveness: 59 (51.3 %) and 56 (48.7 %) patients with restored and non-restored SR, respectively.Results and discussion. The group of patients with non-effective DC cardioversion was characterized more severe heart failure (HF) and more frequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cases, as opposed to the group with restored SR. The studied groups differed significantly by the certain echo parameters, characterizing the structure and function of left heart chambers. The transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed a higher left ventricular (LV) dilatation and more frequent pulmonary hypertension (PH) cases in non-restored SR group. According to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data, both groups demonstrated the deterioration of left atrial (LA) function, namely the decrease of LA appendage flow velocity ≤ 40 cm/s in more than 60 % of patients. Additionally, the LA spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) was visualized in vast majority of non-restored SR patients (94.6 %). At the same time, only 2 (3.6 %) patients with non-effective DC cardioversion were free from SEC, as compared to 44 (74.6 %) restored SR patients (р &lt; 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed SEC as an independent predictor of SR restoration.Conclusions. Persistent AF patients with duration of its episode ≤ 90 days and non-effective elective DC cardioversion demonstrated higher stage of HF, more frequent demand for PCI, the higher LV dilatation, and presence of PH (TTE) and LA SEC (TEE). Among other associated factors, the freedom from LA SEC appeared to be the only independent predictor of SR restoration in such patients.

Prognostic Implications of Left Atrial Spontaneous Echo Contrast with Catheter Ablation of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Left Atrial Dilation.

Background: Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) can be detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients with left atrial (LA) dilation. Whether LASEC has prognostic value in predicting the procedure outcomes in patients with an enlarged atrium is unknown. The prognostic implications of LASEC with the catheter ablation of AF patients with LA dilation will be evaluated in this study. Methods: AF patients scheduled to undergo catheter ablation in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China, between January 2018 and June 2020 were screened for this prospective study. All patients underwent TEE before the procedure. Patients with a left atrial diameter (LAD; 45 mm ≤ LAD < 50 mm) and left atrial volume (LAV ≥ 120 mL) were enrolled in this study. The endpoint was AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence-free survival following a 3-month blanking period after the catheter ablation. All patients were followed up for 18 months. Results: This study included 123 AF patients, who were divided into the LASEC (n = 73) and no LASEC (n = 50) groups. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. At the end of 18 months of follow-up, AF/AT recurrence-free survival was achieved in 33 (45.2%) and 34 (68.0%) patients in the LASEC and no LASEC groups, respectively (p = 0.013). In survival analysis, the LASEC group was also associated with a poor outcome of catheter ablation (log-rank test, p = 0.011; Cox regression, p = 0.015, HR = 2.058, 95%CI = 1.151–3.679). Meanwhile, during the follow-up AF/AT recurrence was observed in 30 (57.7%) and 15 (71.4%) cases in the mild and severe SEC groups, respectively. Ischemic stroke occurred in two patients in the LASEC group. Conclusions: LASEC could be a predictor of the recurrence of AF/AT after catheter ablation in AF patients with LA dilation. The higher the degree of LASEC, the worse the prognosis.

Rivaroxaban in Rheumatic Heart Disease–Associated Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundTesting of factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic heart disease–associated atrial fibrillation has been limited.MethodsWe enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease who had any of the following: a CHA2DS2VASc score of at least 2 (on a scale from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of stroke), a mitral-valve area of no more than 2 cm2, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, or left atrial thrombus. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard doses of rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular (cardiac or noncardiac) or unknown causes. We hypothesized that rivaroxaban therapy would be noninferior to vitamin K antagonist therapy. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis.ResultsOf 4565 enrolled patients, 4531 were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 50.5 years, and 72.3% were women. Permanent discontinuation of trial medication was more common with rivaroxaban than with vitamin K antagonist therapy at all visits. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 560 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446 in the vitamin K antagonist group had a primary-outcome event. Survival curves were nonproportional. The restricted mean survival time was 1599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1675 days in the vitamin K antagonist group (difference, −76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], −121 to −31; P<0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the vitamin K antagonist group (restricted mean survival time, 1608 days vs. 1680 days; difference, −72 days; 95% CI, −117 to −28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted.ConclusionsAmong patients with rheumatic heart disease–associated atrial fibrillation, vitamin K antagonist therapy led to a lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular events or death than rivaroxaban therapy, without a higher rate of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer; INVICTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02832544.)

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Estimation of Left Atrial Thrombus or Spontaneous Echo Contrast Risk in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Low to Borderline CHA2DS2-VASc Score.

PurposeLeft atrial thrombus (LAT)/left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) still exists in CHA2DS2-VASc score-defined low/borderline risk population. The purpose of this study is to explore the risk factors that associate with LAT/SEC and to create a nomogram to predict LAT/SEC risk in NVAF patients with low/borderline CHA2DS2-VASc scores.Patients and MethodsA total of 834 NVAF patients with complete data on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors that associate with LAT/SEC, and a nomogram was established based on the results. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis were performed to verify the predictive power of nomogram.ResultsThe rates for LAT/SEC for the training and validation cohorts were 84 (14.7%) and 30 (11.4%), respectively. Independent factors including age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD), smoke, non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF), and E/e’ were considered to construct the nomogram for LAT/SEC. The AUC for nomogram was 0.839 and 0.811 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration and decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had a good prediction capacity and would be clinically useful.ConclusionAge, LVEF, LAD, smoke, NPAF, and E/e’ are independently associated with LAT/SEC in NVAF patients with low/borderline CHA2DS2-VASc scores. The nomogram that incorporates these six variables effectively predict LAT/SEC risk in NVAF patients with low/borderline CHA2DS2-VASc scores.

External validation and comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF scores for predicting left atrial thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (R is renal dysfunction, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (L is left atrial diameter, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) scores have been developed to estimate the risk of left atrial thrombus (LAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, few external validations have been conducted to assess their accuracy. Thus, this study aimed to validate and compare the two modified scores for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF. This study included 399 patients with NVAF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Risk factors related to LAT/SEC were identified through logistic regression analysis, and predictive value and diagnostic efficiency were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Approximately 9.8% (39/399) of the patients with NVAF had LAT/SEC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, lack of anticoagulation therapy, enlarged leftatrialdiameter, enlarged left ventricular end diastolic diameter, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left atrial appendage emptying velocity, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent risk factors for LAT/SEC. The CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.839) and CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (AUC = 0.829) scores showed larger predictive values than the CHA2DS2-VASc (AUC = 0.737) and CHADS2 (AUC = 0.736) scores. The AUC of the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was similar to that of the CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF score (Z = 0.432; P = 0.666). This study validated that the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF scores are useful prognostic scoring systems for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF.

A nomogram to predict left atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients

BackgroundNon-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) significantly increases the risk of stroke. Although there is availability of prediction models, their ability to predict the risk of stroke in NVAF patients remains suboptimal. Therefore, there is need to improve prediction of high-risk individuals, which is critical for efficient management of patients with NVAF.ObjectiveThe objective of our paper is to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), thereby replacing the risk of stroke in NVAF patients.DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study that analyzed clinical data and echocardiographic indices of 387 patients with NVAF from October 2018 to June 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate independent factors that were used to construct the prediction nomogram.AnalysisThe discriminative ability and calibration of the nomogram to predict LAAT/SEC were tested using C-statistic and calibration plot. The performance of the nomogram was assessed against the CHA2DS2 score, CHA2DS2-VASc score and ATRIA score using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), integrated discrimination index (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI).ResultOut of the total 387 patients enrolled in this study, 232 had LAAT/SEC. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), albumin (ALB), LAA ejection fraction (LAAEF) and LAA global peak longitudinal strain (LAA GPLS) were independent predictors of LAAT/SEC. The constructed nomogram had good discriminative (C = 0.886) and calibration (0.876) abilities after bias correction by the C-index. Compared with other models, the decision curve analyses demonstrated that the nomogram had greater net benefits. Besides, the nomogram had significant improvement in predictive performance, sensitivity and reclassification for LAAT/SEC compared with the CHA2DS2 [(c-index: 0.886 vs. 0.576, p < 0.05), (NRI: 0.539, p < 0.05), (IDI: 0.432, p < 0.05)], CHA2DS2-VASc [(c-index: 0.886 vs0.579, p < 0.05), (NRI: 0.513, p < 0.05), (IDI: 0.432, p < 0.05)] or ATRIA [(c-index: 0.886 vs0.583, p < 0.05), (NRI: 0.546, p < 0.05), (IDI: 0.432, p < 0.05)].ConclusionTaken together, our data demonstrated that the developed nomogram was effective and had potential clinical application in the prediction of LAAT/SEC in patients with NVAF.

The Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Left Atrial Pulmonary Vein Single-Phase and Dual-Phase Enhanced CT Scanning for Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis and SEC in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Objective The accuracy of left atrial pulmonary vein CT enhanced single-phase and dual-phase scanning in the detection of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) before radio frequency ablation was compared in atrial fibrillation patients, so as to optimize the scanning scheme. Methods 78 patients with atrial fibrillation who were admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital from October 2020 to September 2021 and underwent bilateral enhanced CT scan of left atrial pulmonary vein and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination for planned frequency ablation were selected. TEE results were used as the “gold standard” to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the first phase, second phase, and double-phase comprehensive mode of enhanced left atrial pulmonary vein CT in detecting left atrial thrombosis and SEC. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 88.9%, 84.1%, 42.1%, and 98.3%, respectively, in the detection of left atrial thrombosis and SEC by the first phase of CT enhanced scan. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 22.2%, 98.6%, 66.6%, and 90.7%, respectively, in the detection of left atrial thrombosis and SEC by the second phase of CT enhanced scan. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 88.9%, 84.1%, 42.1%, and 98.3%, respectively, in the detection of left atrial thrombosis and SEC by the double-phase comprehensive mode of CT enhanced scan. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of CT diagnosis of left atrial appendage thrombosis and SEC between the three modes of the first phase, the second phase, and the double-phase comprehensive CT (P > 0.05). The mean effective radiation dose of double-phase enhanced scan was 7.49 ± 1.02 mSv. Conclusion Single-phase enhanced CT scan of left atrial pulmonary vein can meet clinical requirements and significantly reduce the radiation dose compared with double-phase enhanced CT scan. Therefore, it is recommended as an initial screening examination for patients with atrial fibrillation before radiofrequency ablation.

Association between interleukin 17A levels and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Association between interleukin 17A levels and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.