Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Research Articles

Stroke Prevention With Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Cardiac Surgery Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Score Studies.

The role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients without previous atrial fibrillation (AF) is not established. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with normal sinus rhythm who underwent cardiac surgery, with and without concomitant LAAO, to evaluate its effect on the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). A systematic review was conducted from inception until December 2023 for randomized and propensity-score studies comparing CVA in patients without AF undergoing cardiac surgery with or without LAAO. Six studies met our inclusion criteria with a total of 4130 patients: 2146 in the LAAO group and 1984 in the no-LAAO group. The risk ratio of postoperative AF was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.86-1.28); P=0.628. The CVA rates at 5 years were 6.8±1.0% in the no-LAAO group and 4.3±0.8% in the LAAO group (log-rank P=0.021). The Cox regression analysis for CVA in patients undergoing LAAO reported a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94); P=0.022. Landmark analysis at 4 years highlighted a significant difference in overall survival between no-LAAO and LAAO groups, 86±12.2% versus 89.6±11.0%; P=0.041. In this meta-analysis of patients without previous AF undergoing cardiac surgery, LAAO was associated with a decreased risk of CVA, no difference in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, and a significant overall survival benefit at a 4-year landmark analysis. Although these findings support LAAO, the randomized LeAAPS trial (Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion for Prophylactic Stroke Reduction Trial), LAA-CLOSURE trial (A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Trial for Stroke Prevention by Prophylactic Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage in Patients Undergoing Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Surgery), and LAACS-2 trial (Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery-2) will help define the effectiveness of LAAO in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who have risk factors for AF and CVA. URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42024496366.

Understanding the role of the left atrial appendage on the flow in the atrium.

The exclusion/occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is a treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are at high risk of stroke and high risk of bleeding. As the role of the LAA is not well understood or explored, this study aims to assess its role on flow dynamics in the left atrium. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out for nine AF patients before and after LAA exclusion. The flow parameters investigated included the LA velocities, Time Averaged Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS), Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI), Relative Residence Time (RRT), and Pressure in the LA. This study shows that, on average, a decrease in TAWSS (1.82 ± 1.85 Pa to 1.27 ± 0.96 Pa, p < 0.05) and a slight increase in OSI (0.16 ± 0.10 to 0.17 ± 0.10, p < 0.05), RRT (1.87 ± 1.84 Pa-1 to 2.11 ± 1.78 Pa-1, p < 0.05), and pressure (-19.2 ± 6.8 mmHg to -15.3 ± 8.3 mmHg, p < 0.05) were observed in the LA after the exclusion of the LAA, with a decrease in low-magnitude velocities. The exclusion of the LAA seems to be associated with changes in LA flow dynamics. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical implications of these changes.

Two-year safety and effectiveness of hybrid ablation versus catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal AF: mid-term results of the CEASE-AF trial

Abstract Background Hybrid Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) combines epicardial and endocardial ablation through a Heart Team approach to target durable, transmural isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW). While the primary efficacy endpoint at 12 months was met with a significant benefit increase for hybrid ablation, we now report the midterm durability of those results. Purpose To evaluate 24-months safety and effectiveness of Hybrid Ablation with left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) versus Catheter Ablation in patients with persistent AF/enlarged left atrium and longstanding persistent AF (LSPAF). Methods CEASE-AF is a prospective, multi-center, 2:1 randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were 18-75 years of age, had symptomatic, drug-refractory persistent AF and enlarged left atrium (&amp;gt;4 cm) or LSPAF, and were undergoing a first ablation. Hybrid Ablation consisted of two stages: thoracoscopic epicardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation for PV and LAPW isolation and epicardial LAAE followed by endocardial ablation 91-180 days later. Catheter Ablation consisted of minimum PV isolation by endocardial RF ablation, and repeat ablation was allowed between 91-180 days. In both arms, additional lesions were permitted according to institutional practices. Effectiveness was freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) off anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) (except AADs not exceeding doses which previously failed) and was assessed through 48-h Holter monitoring reviewed by an independent core laboratory blinded to the study. Safety was major adverse events throughout the study, adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Results There were 102 Hybrid Ablation and 52 Catheter Ablation patients; 26% were female, mean age was 60.7±7.9 years, mean LAD was 4.7±0.4 cm, and 19% had LSPAF with no differences between arms. The 12- and 24-month results are shown for comparison (Table). Through 24-months, effectiveness was 66.3% (63/95) in the Hybrid Arm and 33.3% (17/51) in the Catheter Arm (absolute difference 33.0% [95% CI 14.3%, 48.3%; p&amp;lt;0.001]). Major adverse event rates through 24-months were statistically similar at 10.8% (11/102) in the Hybrid Arm and 9.6% (5/52) in the Catheter Arm (p=1.0). Through 24-months, repeat ablations were performed in 7.4% (7/95) of the Hybrid Arm versus 37.3% (19/51) of the Catheter Arm (p&amp;lt;0.001), and cardioversions were performed in 14.7% (14/95) of the Hybrid Arm versus 29.4% (15/51) of the Catheter Arm (p=0.034) Conclusions: CEASE-AF demonstrated that superior effectiveness of Hybrid Ablation including LAAE versus Catheter Ablation was durable through 24-month follow-up, with 33% absolute improvement in freedom from AF/AFL/AT. Safety rates continued to be similar between arms. Three-year follow-up is ongoing.

Left atrial appendage clipping during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: a very long-term, single-center experience

Abstract Background/introduction Epicardial left atrial appendage (LAA) clipping is an effective strategy for stroke prophylaxis in high thromboembolic (TE) and bleeding risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition to LAA exclusion from systemic circulation, clipping promotes concomitant appendage isolation, which might have positive impacts on arrhythmia control. Purpose The aim of this study was to report safety, success rate, and the long-term clinical outcomes of LAA clipping in a large cohort of AF patients undergoing concomitant hybrid ablation. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing hybrid AF ablation between 2013 and 2023 were enrolled. Hybrid ablation was performed in a one-step procedure consisting of thoracoscopic epicardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation followed by endocardial mapping and ablation, if needed. Ablation lesion set included pulmonary vein (PV) and posterior wall (PW) isolation, as well as RF applications to the LAA/posterolateral ridge. LAA clipping was performed via Atriclip exclusion system (Atricure, Inc., The Nederlands) after epicardial ablation. Additional endocardial lesions were performed in case of incomplete epicardial ablation or at physician’s discretion. Results A total of 130 patients were included (mean age: 65±9.4; 72.3% males); among them, 19.2% and 55.4% had persistent or long-standing persistent AF, respectively. Mean CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED were 3.1±1.1 and 2.3+-0.5. Five patients (3.8 %) had absolute contraindication to long-term oral anticoagulation, 3 (2.3%) had previous life-threatening bleeding events, 17 (13.1%) had a previous TE event. The final clip size was 35mm in 90.7% cases. Acute success was achieved in 97.7%; failure was due to LAA size (n=1), proximity to phrenic nerve (n=1), or bypass graft (n=1). One patient had incomplete occlusion due to a large secondary lobe, which required a second clip. No periprocedural complications related to clipping were documented. At a mean follow-up of 51±35 months, one (0.8%) patient had a stroke and 3 (2.3%) a transient ischemic attack (4 events per 552 patient/years; 0.7%). One patient had a microreentrant tachycardia mapped from the area near the LAA clipping. Conclusion In a large cohort undergoing hybrid AF ablation, epicardial LAA clipping was safe and highly successful. Acute failure was rare and due to LAA morphology or proximity to phrenic nerve and bypass graft. Thromboembolic event rate was very low.

C-49 | Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion during Cardiac Surgery for patients without a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS

C-49 | Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion during Cardiac Surgery for patients without a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS

Noncomplex ventricular arrhythmia associated with greater freedom from recurrent ectopy at 1 year after mitral repair surgery

ObjectiveThe effect of mitral valve (MV) surgery on the natural history of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in patients with arrhythmic MV prolapse remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the cumulative incidence of VA at 1 year after surgical mitral repair. MethodsA retrospective review of progressively captured data identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent elective MV repair for significant degenerative mitral regurgitation as a first-time cardiovascular intervention in a quaternary reference center between January 2018 and December 2020. A subset of 62 consecutive patients with diagnosed arrhythmic MV prolapse was further evaluated for recurrent VA after MV repair. ResultsThe median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years) and 26 of 62 (41.9%) were female. The median time from initial mitral regurgitation/MV prolaspe diagnosis-to-referral was 13.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.4-25) and from VA diagnosis-to-referral was 8 years (IQR, 3-10.6). Using the Lown-Wolf classification, complex VA (Lown grade ≥3) was identified in 36 of 62 patients (58%) at baseline, whereas 8 of 62 (13%) had a cardioverter/defibrillator implanted for primary (4/8) or secondary (4/8) prevention. Left ventricular myocardial scar was confirmed in 23 of 34 (68%) of patients scanned at baseline. The prevailing valve phenotype was bileaflet Barlow (59/62; 95.2%). All patients underwent surgical MV repair by the same team. Surgical repair was stabilized with an annuloplasty prosthesis (median size 36 mm [IQR, 34-38]). Concomitant procedures included tricuspid valve repair (51/62; 82.3%), cryo-maze ± left atrial appendage exclusion (14/62, 23%), and endocardial cryoablation of VA ectopy (4/62; 6.5%). The 30-day and 1-year freedom from recurrent VA were 98.4% and 75.9%, respectively. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA at baseline. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA preoperatively. Complex baseline VA was the strongest predictor of recurrent VA (hazard ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-84.2; P = .024), irrespective of myocardial fibrosis. ConclusionsIn a series of 62 consecutive patients operated electively for arrhythmic mitral prolapse, VA remained undetected in 75.9% of patients at 1 year. Freedom from recurrent VA was greater among patients without complex VA preoperatively, whereas baseline Lown grade ≥3 was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrent VA at 1 year. These findings attest to the importance of early recognition and prompt referral of patients with mitral prolapse and progressive VA to specialty interdisciplinary care.

Four-year follow-up of outcomes of the hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation: A single-center experience

BackgroundThe CONVERGE trial demonstrated that hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation was more effective than catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) at 1 year. Long-term real-world outcome data are scarce. ObjectiveWe described a single-center experience by evaluating the long-term effectiveness and safety of hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation. MethodsThis is a retrospective single-center study. Patients were followed up to 4 years. The primary end point was the rate of AF recurrence up to 4 years postablation. Secondary end points included reduction in antiarrhythmic therapy use, the effect of the ligament of Marshall removal, epicardial posterior wall, 3-dimensional mapping during epicardial ablation, and left atrial appendage exclusion as adjunct intraoperative interventions for AF recurrence. ResultsOf the 170 patients, 86.5% had persistent AF and 13.5% had long-standing persistent AF. AF-free survival was 87.6% at 1 year, 76.9% at 2 years, 70.4% at 3 years, and 59.3% at 4 years. Antiarrhythmic drug use was 87.6% at baseline and reduced to 21%, 20.6%, 18%, and 14.1% at year 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P < .01 for all). Three-dimensional epicardial mapping showed a significant reduction in combined recurrence from 42% to 25% over 4 years of follow-up (P = .023). Ligament of Marshall and left atrial appendage exclusion showed numerical reduction in AF recurrence from 35% to 26% (P = .49) and from 44% to 30% (P = .07). ConclusionThe hybrid convergent procedure reduces AF recurrence and the need for antiarrhythmic drugs and, while maintaining a good safety profile, for the treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent AF.

Clinical outcomes of patients referred for left atrial appendage exclusion who did and did not undergo the procedure

BackgroundLeft atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Not all patients considered for LAAE undergo the procedure because of ineligibility, anatomic or medical constraints, and preference of the patient. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to report on the management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary LAAE clinic, including all who subsequently did and did not undergo LAAE. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from all patients referred to the comprehensive multidisciplinary LAAE clinic at the University of Michigan between 2016 and 2022. A consecutive 301 patients (age, 75 ± 8 years; 106 women) with atrial fibrillation were evaluated. LAAE was performed in 168 patients (56%) with use of the Watchman device in 146 (49%) and surgically in 22 (7%). LAAE was not performed in 133 patients (44%, no-LAAE group) because of ineligibility in 62 (21%), anatomic constraints in 23 (7%), and preference of the patient in 48 (36%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.6; P = .002) and HAS-BLED score (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.1; P < .001) were higher in the LAAE groups. ResultsAnticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 137 of 146 (94%) and 61 of 133 (61%) in the Watchman and no-LAAE groups, respectively (P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2–4.0 years), in the LAAE (n = 168) and no-LAAE (n = 133) groups, respectively, 39 (23%) vs 29 (22%) deaths, 13 (8%) vs 5 (4%) thromboembolic events, and 24 (14%) vs 23 (17%) bleeding complications occurred. Continued long-term anticoagulation was not a predictor of clinical outcomes. ConclusionAfter a comprehensive evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic, ∼50% of the patients referred for LAAE did not proceed with LAAE and resumed anticoagulation.

Minimally invasive epicardial surgical left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation patients at high risk for stroke and for bleeding

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk for stroke and for bleeding may be unsuitable for either oral anticoagulation or endocardial left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. However, minimally invasive, epicardial left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) may be an option. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of LAAE in high-risk AF patients not receiving oral anticoagulation. MethodsA retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data was conducted to evaluate thromboembolic events in AF patients who underwent LAAE compared to a 1:4 propensity score–matched group of patients who did not receive LAAE (control). Neither group was receiving any oral anticoagulation at baseline or follow-up. Fine-Gray models estimated hazard ratios and evaluated between-group differences. Bootstrapping was applied to generate 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsThe LAAE group (n = 243) was 61% male (mean age 75 years). AF was nonparoxysmal in 70% (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.4; mean HAS-BLED score 4.2). The matched control group (n = 972) had statistically similar characteristics. One-year adjusted estimates of thromboembolic events were 7.3% (95% CI 4.3%–11.1%) in the LAAE group and 12.1% (95% CI 9.5%–14.8%) in the control group. Absolute risk reduction was 4.8% (95% CI 0.6%–8.9%; P = .028). Adjusted hazard ratio for thromboembolic events for LAAE vs non-LAAE was 0.672 (95% CI 0.394–1.146). ConclusionIn AF patients not taking oral anticoagulation who are at high risk for stroke and for bleeding, minimally invasive, thoracoscopic, epicardial LAAE was associated with a lower rate of thromboembolic events.

Definition and anatomical description of the left atrial appendage neck.

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is well known as a source of cardiac thrombus formation. Despite its clinical importance, the LAA neck is still anatomically poorly defined. Therefore, this study aimed to define the LAA neck and determine its morphometric characteristics. We performed three-dimensional reconstructions of the heart chambers based on contrast-enhanced electrocardiography-gated computed tomography scans of 200 patients (47% females, 66.5 ± 13.6 years old). The LAA neck was defined as a truncated cone-shaped canal bounded proximally by the LAA orifice and distally by the lobe origin and was present in 98.0% of cases. The central axis of the LAA neck was 14.7 ± 2.3 mm. The mean area of the LAA neck walls was 856.6 ± 316.7 mm2 . The LAA neck can be divided into aortic, arterial (the smallest), venous (the largest), and free surfaces. All areas have a trapezoidal shape with a broader proximal base. There were no statistically significant differences in the morphometric characteristics of the LAA neck between LAA types. Statistically significant differences between the sexes in the main morphometric parameters of the LAA neck were found in the central axis length and the LAA neck wall area. The LAA neck can be evaluated from computed tomography scans and their three-dimensional reconstructions. The current study provides a complex morphometric analysis of the LAA neck. The precise definition and morphometric details of the LAA neck presented in this study may influence the effectiveness and safety of LAA exclusion procedures.

Abstract 15606: Effectiveness and Safety of the Dual Epicardial &amp; Endocardial Procedure (DEEP) Approach for Treatment of Subjects With Persistent or Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PersAF/LSPAF) With Radiofrequency Ablation

Background: A collaborative approach between Electrophysiologists (EP) and Cardiothoracic Surgeons (CTS) to effectively target pulmonary veins (PVs) and substrate beyond PVs may improve outcomes for persistent and longstanding persistent AF (PersAF/LSPerAF). Hypothesis: A minimally invasive hybrid approach of bilateral thoracoscopic epicardial ablation and left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) with endocardial mapping/ablation (Hybrid approach) is safe and effective to treat advanced AF patients who have failed medical therapy. Aim: DEEP (NCT02393885) aims to establish safety and effectiveness of a Bipolar Radiofrequency (RF) System in a Hybrid approach to treat PersAF/LSPerAF. Methods: DEEP is a prospective, international, single arm trial at 17 sites. Key eligibility: adults with drug refractory PersAF/LSPerAF, left atrial diameter (LAD) ≤5.5cm, failed class I/III AAD, and ≤2 previous failed endocardial catheter ablations (CA). Epicardial surgical ablation included PV isolation, roof and floor lines (posterior LA box), left superior PV to LAA lesion, ganglionic plexi and Ligament of Marshall ablation and LAAE. CA followed 91-121 D post epicardial procedure. After 90 D blanking and 90 D AAD optimization periods, 24-hr rhythm monitoring and ECG were performed 6 and 12 M post CA with symptom driven monitoring between. Primary effectiveness was defined as freedom from atrial arrhythmia (&gt;30 sec) absent new/increased dose of previously failed AAD through 12 M. Safety was device/procedure-related SAEs within 30 D of epicardial ablation and 7 D of CA in all who received anesthesia. Results: Ninety patients were enrolled in 2015-2020, 83.3% PersAF, 16.7% LSPerAF, mean age 63.4±7.74 yrs, 83.3% male, mean BMI 29.9, CHAD2DS2-VASc median 2.0 (1.0, 3.0), 48% failed CA, median AF duration 3.8 yrs, mean LAD 4.5cm. Primary effectiveness 70.6% (60/85; 95% CI 60.9%, 80.3%, p=0.0232) and freedom from AF through 12 M 78.8% (p=0.0002). The adverse event rate was 6.7% (6/90); equal in epi- and endocardial cohort. Both primary endpoints met prespecified success criteria. Conclusion: A collaborative approach between EP and CTS to Hybrid ablation is effective for PersAF/LSerPAF when benefit-risk is deemed favorable, given limited alternative treatments.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic epicardial pacing: A contemporary overview.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has revolutionized the approach and management of pulmonary and cardiac diseases, and its applications have significantly expanded in the last two decades. Beyond its established role in thoracic procedures, VATS has also emerged as a valuable technique for various electrophysiological procedures, including pacemaker implantations, ablation procedures, and left atrial appendage exclusion. This paper presents a thorough review of the existing literature on pacing procedures performed using a VATS approach. By analyzing and synthesizing the available studies, we aim to provide an in-depth understanding of the current knowledge and advancements in VATS-based pacing procedures. A key focus of this review is the detailed description of implantation techniques via a VATS approach.

Fourth Time’s a Charm: Complex Closure of Incomplete Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion

Fourth Time’s a Charm: Complex Closure of Incomplete Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion

Computational Flow Dynamic Analysis in Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus Formation Risk: A Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia characterized by irregular and rapid electrical activity in the atria, leading to ineffective contraction and poor blood flow. More than 90% of the left atrial (LA) thrombi that cause thromboembolic events during atrial fibrillation (AF) develop in the left atrial appendage (LAA). AF modifies the hemodynamics of the left atrium, which can result in thrombosis of the LAA, systemic embolism, and stroke. The current options to reduce thromboembolic events are oral anticoagulation, surgical LAA exclusion, or percutaneous LAA occlusion. However, the mechanism underlying thrombus development in the LAA remains poorly understood. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis can be used to better understand the risk of thrombus formation and subsequent embolic events. CFD enables the simulation and visualization of blood flow patterns within the heart, including complex structures such as the LAA. Using CFD, researchers can analyze the hemodynamics of blood flow, identify areas of stagnation or turbulence, and predict the risk of thrombus formation. The correlation between blood flow dynamics, atrial fibrillation, and the risk of stroke has been highlighted by CFD studies investigating the underlying mechanism of thrombus formation in the LAA. This review study intends to provide a comprehensive overview of the factors involved in thrombus formation and their implications for clinical practice by synthesizing the insights acquired from these CFD studies.

EVOLUTION OF THORACOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: FROM INCEPTION TO CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES

HighlightsThe development and implementation of video-assisted thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation ablation since 2005 by R. Wolf and colleagues have undergone a number of modifications for improvement and simplification. A study of the evolutionary development of thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation is necessary to optimize ablation recruitment and surgical technique for different forms of atrial fibrillation. AbstractThere is a variety of treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF): therapeutic, interventional and surgical. The effectiveness of these methods varies significantly depending on the form of AF. For a long time, surgery was considered the only highly effective treatment for AF. In modern arrhythmology, «Maze IV» and its modifications are considered only as a simultaneous procedure in cardiac surgery. The work of M. Haïssaguerre et al. has established that the main focus of catheter ablation (CA) in AF should be the pulmonary veins, but their isolation in non-paroxysmal AF is questionable. This discovery has stimulated the development of alternative treatment modalities for resistant AF. Recently, video-assisted thoracoscopic epicardial ablation (TSA), which does not require sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, has been increasingly preferred. TSA of AF is an alternative surgical treatment for isolated forms of AF on the working heart. This procedure may include: pulmonary vein ablation, posterior left atrial wall and pulmonary vein ablation and left atrial appendage exclusion, but its effectiveness varies considerably due to the heterogeneity of patients, surgical technique and follow-up period. The aim of this review is to provide data on the evolutionary development of thoracoscopic ablation of AF depending on the choice of surgical access, ablation line set and ablation device.

Comparative analysis of long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic and ablation index-guided catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Aim. To conduct a comparative assessment of the long-term results of thoracoscopic and catheter ablation using the ablation index in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods. A comparative analysis of the long-term results of catheter ablation using the ablation index - group № 1 (36 patients) and thoracoscopic ablation with the left atrial appendage exclusion - group № 2 (42 patients) was performed.Results. The effectiveness of catheter ablation was 57.14%, thoracoscopic ablation - 67.5% at 12-month followup (р=0,128). There were also no statistically significant differences in safety (p=0.55). Analyzing the structure of postprocedural atrial tachycardias in group №1 was demonstrated that AF recurrence was in 93.3%, in group №2 - in 50%. Atypical atrial flutter was documented in 6.6% of cases in group №1 and in 31.5% - in group №2. Typical atrial flutter was documented only in group №2 (18.75% (3)). However, AF recurrence was more common in the catheter ablation group after 6 months of follow-up (p=0.04).Conclusion. Catheter and thoracoscopic ablation are comparable in terms of overall efficacy and safety, however, thoracoscopic ablation provides greater freedom from AF in a 6 month.

The Strengths and Weaknesses of Left Atrial Appendage Ligation or Exclusion (LARIAT, AtriaClip, Surgical Suture)

Left atrial appendage (LAA) epicardial exclusion has been associated with addressing 2 potential deleterious consequences attributed to the LAA, namely, thrombus formation and an arrhythmogenic contributor in advanced forms of atrial fibrillation. With more than 60 years of history, the surgical exclusion of the LAA has been firmly established. Numerous approaches have been used for surgical LAA exclusion including surgical resections, suture ligation, cutting and non-cutting staples, and surgical clips. Additionally, a percutaneous epicardial LAA ligation approach has been developed. A discussion of the various epicardial LAA exclusion approaches and their efficacy will be discussed, along with the salient beneficial affects on LAA thrombus formation, LAA electrical isolation and neuroendocrine homeostasis.

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: Preclinical and Early Clinical Results With the Laminar Device

BackgroundThe Laminar device rotates and closes the left atrial appendage (LAA) using an integrated ball and lock that excludes and eliminates the LAA pouch. There is a low device surface area, minimizing the risk of peridevice leak (PDL) and device-related thrombus (DRT) formation. ObjectivesThis study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Laminar LAA exclusion device in healthy animals and human subjects with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk of ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism. MethodsThe preclinical study implanted the Laminar device into canine subjects that underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopic evaluation, followed by necropsy and histological assessment at 45 and 150-days post-implant. The early clinical study implanted the device in human subjects, followed to 12 months postimplantation. Procedural success was defined as device implantation in the intended location without residual LAA leak >5 mm as seen by TEE. Safety endpoints included freedom from stroke, systemic embolism, pericardial effusion, or tamponade, life-threatening/major bleeding, or death. ResultsThe Laminar device was successfully implanted in 10 canines. In all animals at 45 days and 150 days, no PDL or DRT was found, and histological examination showed fully closed LAAs covered with neo-endocardium. The device was successfully implanted in 15 human subjects with no safety events out to 12 months postimplantation. All subjects had successful protocol-defined LAA closure without DRT at 45 days by TEE and computed tomography, which remained stable through 12 months’ follow-up. ConclusionsThe preclinical and early clinical results demonstrate a promising safety and efficacy profile for the Laminar LAA exclusion device.

Left atrial function after thoracoscopic left atrial appendage exclusion as standalone and as combined with epicardial atrial fibrillation ablation: echocardiographic findings at one- year follow up

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the most common source of thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The Totally Thoracoscopic (TT)-LAA exclusion with epicardial clip is an effective procedure, however the effects on left atrial (LA) function remain unknown. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the impact of TT-LAA exclusion on the LA function in patients undergoing to standalone TT-LAA exclusion and patients received combined procedure, namely: TT-LAA exclusion and Thoracoscopic Epicardial Ablation (TEA). Methods 39 AF Patients underwent to TT-LAA exclusion with the clip. Indication to standalone TT-LAA exclusion was: high risk for ischemic stroke or contraindication to long-term anticoagulant therapy. All patients were screened preoperatively with 3D CT scan, transthoracic and trans-esophageal echocardiography. Intraoperative clip positioning and LAA exclusion were guided by trans-esophageal echo. To evaluate LA function, standard transthoracic echocardiography and 2D strain of LA were performed before surgery, at discharge (3-4 days after the procedure), at 3-month and at 1 year. Routine blood tests and BNP levels were also measured. Results The study enrolled 39 consecutive patients, 25 underwent to standalone TT-LAA exclusion (mean age 78.6 ± 5.7 years, 79% males), and 14 LAA exclusion during TEA (mean age 64.5 ± 8.2 years, 82% males). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were 3.5 and 2.1 respectively. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Figure 1. There were no major complications during the procedure. At median follow-up of 13 months, 1 non cardiovascular death, 1 ischemic stroke and 4 cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred. At 2D strain of LA, the reservoir function decreased significantly after clip implantation and recovered at 3-months follow-up; at 1 year it remained stable. Furthermore, NT-proBNP increased significantly after LAA exclusion with a return to baseline after 3 months. Changes in E/A occurred at predischarge and did not persist at follow up. Echocardiographic findings are summarized in Figure 2. Patients with indication to TEA and LAA exclusion presented a lower LA volume and a lower strain value. Conclusion The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) The amputation of LAA is a safe procedure at long term follow up. 2) LAA amputation with the clip is associated with acute elevation of BNP levels the days after the procedure with return to baseline at 3 months and one year. 3) LAA amputation impairs the LA reservoir function after the procedure, with recovery after 3 months and remains preserved at one-year. This occurs either when LA strain is measured in sinus rhythm or in AF. 4) LAA exclusion results in a change in E/A that does not persist at three months follow-up and at 1 year. 5) Patients with indication to epicardial AF ablation and LAA exclusion present a lower LA volume with a lower strain value than patients undergoing standalone TT-LAA exclusion.

Left atrial appendage exclusion using a stapler with thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation

Highlights. Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation is extremely important and difficult. Lifelong anticoagulant therapy is not always an effective way of preventing thrombosis in the left atrial appendage in this group of patients. In this regard, one of the most urgent problems of modern surgical arrhythmology and cardiac surgery is the search for new open and minimally invasive surgical methods of excluding the left atrial appendage from the blood flow.Aim. To investigate the safety and efficacy of using the left atrial appendage stapler for video-guided thoracoscopic ablation (TSA) of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods. The retrospective, single-center study included 100 patients with non-valvular AF who underwent video-guided thoracoscopic ablation of AF with single-stage left atrial appendage exclusion using an Endo GIA stapler (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA).Results. The mean age of the patients was 56,2±8,8 years, the majority of the patients (73 patients, 73%) were male. Patients with persistent 50 (50%) AF and longstanding AF 50 (50%) were included in the study. The duration of atrial fibrillation was 4 (1,7–7) years. The median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 2 (1–1,5) and 1 (0-1), respectively. The mean anticoagulation therapy-to-ablation time was 4,2±1,9 years. Thirty-eight (38%) patients were prescribed warfarin preoperatively. The completeness of left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion was confirmed by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. The average length of the staple lines was 48 (35–75). A single left atrial appendage exclusion was performed using a 60 mm staples. In 12 (12%) patients, stapler exclusions were performed using two 45 mm staples due to insufficient staple length. None of the patients had ruptures, punctures along the staple lines or rupture of the surrounding epicardial tissue. Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued 6 months after TSA in 70 (70%) patients with sustained sinus rhythm observed on 24-h Holter Monitoring, satisfactory CHA2DS2-VASc scores and after confirmation of absence of left atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography and contrast-enhanced MSCT. No strokes were reported within 1,2±0,7 years after discontinuing anticoagulation therapy.Conclusion. Exclusion of LAA using a stapler for TSA is a highly effective and safe technique for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to alternative methods of excluding the LAA from the systemic blood flow.