Leflunomide Group Research Articles

Discovery of a new class of potent pyrrolo[3,4-c]quinoline-1,3-diones based inhibitors of human dihydroorotate dehydrogenase: Synthesis, pharmacological and toxicological evaluation

Twenty N-substituted pyrrolo[3,4-c]quinoline-1,3-diones 3a-t were synthesized by a cyclization reaction of Pfitzinger's quinoline ester precursor with the selected aromatic, heteroaromatic and aliphatic amines. The structures of all derivatives were confirmed by IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS spectra, while their purity was determined using HPLC techniques. Almost all compounds were identified as a new class ofpotent inhibitors against hDHODH among which 3a and 3t were the most active ones with the same IC50 values of 0.11 μM, about seven times better than reference drug leflunomide. These two derivatives also exhibited very low cytotoxic effects toward healthy HaCaT cells and the optimal lipophilic properties with logP value of 1.12 and 2.07 respectively, obtained experimentally at physiological pH. We further evaluated the comparative differences in toxicological impact of the three most active compounds 3a, 3n and 3t and reference drug leflunomide. The rats were divided into five groups and were treated intraperitoneally, control group (group I) with a single dose of leflunomide (20 mg/kg) group II and the other three groups, III, IV and V were treated with 3a, 3n and 3t (20 mg/kg bw) separately. The investigation was performed in liver, kidney and blood by examining serum biochemical parameters and parameters of oxidative stress.

Effectiveness of methotrexate and leflunomide as corticoid-sparing drugs in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

The need for glucocorticoid-sparing drugs (GCSD) remains an important issue and is an unmet need in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). We therefore aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of methotrexate (MTX) and of leflunomide (LEF) in daily clinical practice in PMR patients from Argentina. A multicentre and observational study (medical records review) of PMR patients seen between 2007 and 2023, who had at least three months of follow-up after starting a GCSD, either MTX or LEF, was performed. Results are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges [25th-75th (IQR)] for continuous variables and percentages for categorical ones. The two treatment groups were compared using χ2 test for categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the log-rank test for time-to-event data. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression. In all cases, a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. One-hundred and eighty-six patients (79% female) with a median age of 72 years (IQR, 65-77 years) were included. One-hundred and forty-three patients (77%) were prescribed MTX (15, IQR 10-15) and 43 (23%) LEF (20 mg, fixed dose). Flare-ups (relapses and recurrences) occurred in 13 patients (7%) and were comparable between both groups. Persistent GCSD intake was observed in 145 patients (78%). Glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal was achieved in 67 of these 145 patients (46%) and this occurred more frequently in the LEF group (P = 0.001). Furthermore, time until prednisone discontinuation was shorter in the LEF-treated patients (4.7 months, IQR 3-20 on LEF versus 31.8 months, IQR 10-82 on MTX, P = 0.000). Remission was found more frequently in the LEF group (P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, the probability of remission was higher with LEF therapy (P = 0.010) and this finding persisted in the subgroup analysis who were followed up < 40 months (OR 3.12, 95% CI = 1.30-7.47, P = 0.011). This study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of LEF and even its superiority in achieving remission when compared with MTX as GCSD in PMR patients. Further research is needed to support these findings.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectiveThe effectiveness of immunosuppressive and corticosteroid treatments for Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) remains thoroughly evaluated. We undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids plus leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy.MethodsEligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We also searched the references of the included studies. Our protocol followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Eligibility criteria were defined using a PICOS framework.ResultsOur study included three articles presenting 342 patient cases. Findings revealed that low-dose corticosteroids combined with the leflunomide group were effective in relieving urine protein excretion (UPE) [mean difference (MD) = -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41 to -0.30, P < 0.00001] compared with the full-dose corticosteroids group. Regarding serum creatinine (SCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), complete remission rate, and overall response rate, there was no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Regarding safety, low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events [odds ratio (OR): 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.91, P = 0.04]. Besides, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of respiratory infection, abnormal liver function, diarrhea, herpes zoster, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, pneumonia, diabetes, and urinary tract infection (P > 0.05).ConclusionsLow-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide are a safe and effective treatment for progressive IgA nephropathy.Trial registrationThe PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022361883.

Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).MethodA retrospective cohort study was performed with the following...

Seasonal and Treatment-Related Variation in 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Concentration in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Background/Objectives: 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH-D) is a fat-soluble compound that plays many essential functions, including bone formation, neuromuscular functions, and prevention of osteoporosis and inflammation. Recent data indicate that its metabolites are associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) progression and neuropathic pain in RA patients. We aimed to assess the effect of RA pharmacotherapy and seasonal variation on serum levels of 25-OH-D in RA patients who received treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) for at least one year. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of data collected from 101 patients with RA who received treatment for at least one year. All of them have supplemented 25-OH-D (2000 IU daily) for at least one year. Results: We observed a significant seasonal variation in 25-OH-D concentration (p = 0.004). Moreover, there were significant differences (p = 0.03) between LEF (50.63 ± 17.73 ng/mL) and MTX (34.73 ± 14.04 ng/mL) treatment groups, but only for the summer population. A correlation was observed between 25-OH-D and RA duration-once again, in the summer population (the whole group-r = -0.64; treatment subgroups-r = -0.82 for LEF and -0.61 for MTX). Deficiency of 25-OH-D (below 20 ng/mL) was confirmed in 28.7% of patients, while 18.8% had suboptimal 25-OH-D levels (20-30 ng/mL). Conclusions: Our results showed that both RA pharmacotherapy and seasonal variation affect the serum levels of 25-OH-D in patients with active RA.

The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine versus leflunomide in patients with IgA nephropathy: a single-center experience

PurposeTo date, our understanding of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) pathophysiology has remained incomplete; therefore, treatment remains largely empiric, and the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants remain controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine and leflunomide therapy in a retrospective cohort of patients with IgAN.MethodsWe screened the IgAN registration database in our department, and a total of 159 kidney patients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN were enrolled, with 57 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (hydroxychloroquine group), 52 patients receiving leflunomide plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (leflunomide group), and 50 patients receiving only a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor-only group). Changes in proteinuria, hematuria, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as adverse events, were analyzed during the follow-up period.ResultsAt the end of 6-month follow-up, proteinuria significantly decreased by 70.36 (57.54, 79.33)%, 57.29 (46.79, 67.29)% and 41.20 (25.76, 48.94)% in the hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor-only groups, respectively, compared to baseline (all P values < 0.001). Hematuria significantly decreased by 71.07 (56.48, 82.47)% in the leflunomide group (P < 0.001). The eGFR improved by 3.72 ± 2.97%, 3.16 ± 2.00% and 1.91 ± 2.41%, respectively, in the hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor-only groups, but without statistical significance. No serious adverse events occurred during the follow-up period.ConclusionBoth hydroxychloroquine combined with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and leflunomide combined with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were more effective than a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor alone in improving proteinuria in IgAN patients. Hydroxychloroquine was more effective in reducing proteinuria, and leflunomide showed superiority in reducing hematuria. Our results need to be verified in large-scale randomized controlled trials.Graphical abstract

Treatment of BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Leflunomide Versus Cidofovir.

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is a clinicopathological entity that negatively affects graft function in kidney transplant recipients. We compared the efficacy of leflunomide and cidofovir to treat BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Medical records of pediatric recipients with BK viremia for the period 2004 through 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, and patients diagnosed with BK polyomavirusassociated nephro-pathy were included in the study. A serum BK virus level above 104 copies/mL was accepted as BK viremia. We defined BK polyomavirusassociated nephropathy as detection of BK virus SV40 antigen on immunochemistry staining of renal graft tissue accompanied by signs of tubulointerstitial nephritis or elevated serum creatinine in addition to BK viremia. Of 304 kidney transplant recipients, 53 had persistent BK viremia; 36 of these patients (61.1% male) were included in the study with the diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Twelve patients (33.3%) received cidofovir, and 14 (38.8%) received leflunomide. Results were similar between the cidofovir and leflunomide groups for serum creatinine level at last follow-up (0.91 ± 0.29 vs 0.94 ± 0.37 mg/dL, respectively; P = .843) and graft failure rate (8.3% vs 14.2%, respectively; P = .632). Graft failure was observed in 8.3% of patients with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Leflunomide and cidofovir showed similar efficacy for treatment of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus mycophenolate mofetil in treating IgG4-related disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Combination therapy of glucocorticoids (GCs) plus leflunomide (LEF) and GCs plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was reported to have good efficacy and safety in the management of IgG4-RD. However, studies comparing the efficacy and safety of these two combination therapies were unavailable. Herein, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of GCs plus LEF and GCs plus MMF in treating IgG4-RD. This study included 130 newly diagnosed IgG4-RD patients who received the therapy of GCs plus LEF (group I) and GCs plus MMF (group II). Clinical data at baseline and after treatment, treatment response, relapse rate, and adverse effects were recorded and analyzed. Patients in both groups responded well to the treatment in the 1st-month follow-up, and 100% of patients achieved treatment response. However, at the 6th and 12th-month follow-up, the total response rate of group II was higher than that in group I (75.6 vs. 53.7%, p = 0.038 and 85.4% vs. 61.0%, p = 0.013, respectively). In addition, the duration of disease remission in group II was longer than that in group I (9(6-9) vs. 6(6-6) months, p = 0.014). Moreover, more patients in group I had adverse effects compared with group II (36.6 vs. 7.3%, p < 0.01); andthe most common adverse events of LEF were rash (12.2%) and elevation of liver enzymes (9.8%). The combination therapy of GCs plus low-dose MMF had better efficacy and safety in the management of IgG4-RD compared with the therapy of GCs plus LEF.

Comparative evaluation of effect of various means of basic and genetically engineered biological therapy on clinical course, rate of development of osteodestructive changes, quality of life and state of stress resistance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (open observational study)

Objective. To study the effect of various basic and genetic engineering biological therapies (infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab) used as first, second- and third-line drugs in combination with methotrexate on clinical course, quality of life (QOL), and the evolution of articular erosions and synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 12 months of follow-up.Material and methods. This paper is an open observational study of the efficacy and safety of various basic and genetic engineering biological therapy agents (bDMARD) in patients with early active RA who are in the Mechnikov North-West State Medical University registry. Included are 151 patients with early RA (eRA), the average age is 58.2 ± 5.5 years, the disease duration is 6.5 ± 0.3 months, DAS 28-CRP – 4.48 ± 0.87. At the first stage, basic therapy was administered to patients with eRA by random sampling: sulfasalazine (CC) 2 g per day (group I – 55 patients), methotrexate (MT) – 20 mg per week (group II – 55 patients), or leflunomide (LF) 20 mg per day (group III – 41 patients). The follow-up was 12 months. At the second stage, 101 patients with persisting moderate (DAS 28: 3.2–5.1) and high levels of RA activity (DAS 28 &gt; 5.1) despite ongoing therapy with DMARDs were assigned MT at a dose of 25 mg per week (subgroup 1–25 patients), or MT – 20 mg per week in combination with infliximab (INF) – 3 mg/kg (subgroup of 2–25 patients), or – MT 20 mg per week and rituximab (RM) – two infusions of 1000 mg at the week 0 and 2 and then at the week 52nd and 54th with a duration of observation of 12 months. In the third stage, 20 patients (16 women and 4 men aged 28 to 67 years) with a high disease activity DAS 28-CRP despite previous therapy with MT and INF or RM were transferred to therapy with an IL6 – tocilizumab receptor blocker as a second-line or third-line drug. The duration of observation ranged from 6 months to five years.Results. By 12 months of treating DMARDs, clinical remission was achieved more often in the MT group than in the LF group (43.2 and 32.4 %) (p &lt; 0.05), and was accompanied by a decrease in the expression of markers of early activation of T-lymphocytes, IL-1β, IL-2 and IL-4. In the SS group, clinical remission was not observed, while there was a significant increase in the median of the total Sharpe score and erosion score relative to the baseline. The prescription of INF or PM as the first bDMARD after 12 months led to a significant increase in the physical and psychological components of the patients' QL and positive dynamics of the HAQ index compared to baseline values. The use of tocilizumab as a second-line and third-line drug in patients with active RA and the ineffectiveness of previous therapy for DMARD and bDMARD contributed to a significant decrease in DAS 28-CRP by as early as 24 weeks of follow-up. Cases of serious adverse reactions (AE) are not marked.Conclusions. There were no statistically significant differences in the dynamics of CRP, ESR, circulating immune complex and X-ray progression indicators between the groups of patients who received biological therapy of INF and RM, which confirms the possibility of ‘switching’ therapy from the first bDMARD to the drugs of subsequent lines with an increase in the clinical activity of RA. Tocilizumab can be a second- and third-line drug with an ‘escape’ effect from other bDMARDs.

Performance of leflunomide as a steroid-sparing agent in giant cell arteritis: A single-center, open-label study.

The management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) remains challenging and many patients require prolonged glucocorticoid treatment due to high disease relapse rates. We aimed to evaluate the role of leflunomide as a steroid-sparing agent in GCA. This prospective open-label study included patients diagnosed with GCA between July 2014 and August 2020 and followed them for 96 weeks. At the time of diagnosis all patients received treatment following a predefined glucocorticoid regimen. At week 12 of follow-up, 10 mg of leflunomide per day was recommended as an adjunctive therapy. The decision to start with leflunomide treatment was patient-dependent. Follow-up visits were performed adhering to a predetermined protocol. The number of relapses, the cumulative glucocorticoid dose and treatment-related adverse events were recorded and compared between glucocorticoid-only and leflunomide groups. Of the 215 GCA patients [67.6% female, median (IQR) age 74 (66-79) years], 151 (70.2%) received leflunomide at week 12 (leflunomide group); the others continued with glucocorticoids (glucocorticoid-only group). During the study 64/215 (29.8%) patients relapsed. Of the 51 patients who relapsed after 12 weeks, 22/151 patients (14.6%) and 29/64 patients (45.3%) were in the leflunomide and glucocorticoid-only group, respectively (p = 0.001; NNT 3.3 for leflunomide). Furthermore, 80/151 patients in the leflunomide group managed to stop glucocorticoids at week 48 [with relapses in 6/80 patients (7.5%)]. The cumulative glucocorticoid dose was lower in the leflunomide group (p = 0.009). In our cohort, leflunomide safely and effectively reduced the GCA relapse rate and demonstrated a steroid-sparing effect in over three quarters of patients.

Hepatoprotective effects of carvedilol and crocin against leflunomide-induced liver injury

Leflunomide-induced liver injury has been an important problem since its approval. Although, severe cases of leflunomide-induced liver injury leading to hospitalization are rare, the risk is higher with concurrent liver disease or use of other hepatotoxic drugs.The current study was conducted to investigate the potential protective effects of carvedilol and crocin alone and in combination against leflunomide-induced hepatic injury and to clarify the possible mechanism(s) through which carvedilol and crocin may elicit their effects.Fifty male albino mice were allocated into five groups: normal control group, leflunomide group, carvedilol group, crocin group, and combination group. These groups were given vehicle, leflunomide, leflunomide plus carvedilol, leflunomide plus crocin, and leflunomide plus combination of carvedilol and crocin, respectively. The study was conducted for 8 weeks, and different parameters were assessed.The results demonstrated that leflunomide significantly increased the serum levels of AST, ALT, ALP, hepatic MDA, nitrite, mTOR gene, PI3K gene, TGF-β, and the pathological changes alongside with the significant decrease of serum albumin, total protein, hepatic catalase, and GSH. While the coadministration of carvedilol, crocin and their combination with leflunomide significantly decreased the serum levels of AST, ALT, ALP, hepatic MDA, mTOR gene, PI3K gene, TGF-β, and the pathological changes alongside with the significant elevation of serum albumin, total protein, hepatic catalase, and GSH.This study is suggesting several solutions for Leflunomide-induced hepatotoxicity demonstrated by the protective effect of the antihypertensive drug carvedilol, the natural product crocin, and their combination which was demonstrated to be superior to each drug alone.

Retrospective analysis of leflunomide and low-dose methylprednisolone for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy combined with membranous nephropathy.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) combined with Membranous Nephropathy (MN) was observed in some patients with the increasing of Diabetic patients. However, no treatment guidelines are available for DKD combined with MN. In this study, we for the first time analyzed the safety and efficacy of leflunomide (LEF) combined with low-dose glucocorticoid methylprednisolone (MP) in the treatment of DKD with MN. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with the highest number of DKD combined with MN diagnosed by renal biopsy between December 2016 and December 2020. The inclusion criteria were a history of diabetes for more than 20 months, no glucocorticoid therapy or immunosuppressant therapy for at least 6 months, urine protein level greater than 3.5 g, and a follow-up time of 16 months. In addition to conservative treatment, the patients received LEF monotherapy (LEF, n = 38) or LEF combined with low-dose methylprednisolone (LEF+MP, n = 26). After 16 months of treatment, the complete remission rate was 2.6%, and the remission rate was 15.8% in the LEF group; in the LEF+MP group, the complete remission rate and the remission rate were 23.1% and 34.6%, respectively. At month 16, the urine protein level was lower than the baseline value in both groups (p < 0.05) and was significantly lower in the LEF+MP group than in the LEF group (p < 0.05). Serum albumin levels were higher than the baseline value in both groups (p < 0.05), with no significant between-group difference (p > 0.05). No inter- or intragroup difference in serum creatinine or glycated hemoglobin was observed. During treatment, the relapse rate was lower in the LEF+MP group than in the LEF group (p < 0.05). No irreversible adverse events were observed. In summary, LEF+MP is more effective than LEF monotherapy for DKD combined with MN. Large, long-term, randomized, double-blind, controlled studies are needed to further validate the clinical efficacy of LEF+MP.

Leflunomide versus azathioprine for maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial and long-term follow-up

ObjectivesPrevious studies have compared mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis (LN). Leflunomide is an immunosuppressant widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of...

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib versus leflunomide with glucocorticoids treatment in Takayasu arteritis: A prospective study

To investigate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF) versus tofacitinib (TOF) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. Sixty-seven active patients were recruited from an ongoing observational TAK cohort, including 35 patients treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) and LEF and 32 patients treated with GCs and TOF. The observation period was 12 months. The effectiveness rate (ER), remission rate, inflammatory parameters reduction, vascular imaging changes, GCs tapering, disease relapse and side-effects were evaluated between two groups. These aspects were also assessed separately among treatment-naïve or -refractory patients. The ER at 6 and 12 months was 88.57% (31/35) vs. 87.50% (28/32) (p = 1.00) and 71.43% (25/35) vs. 71.88% (23/32) (p = 1.00) in the LEF and TOF group. The percentage of patients with persistent remission from 6th to 12th months and GCs≤7.5 mg/day at 12 months was higher in TOF group (15 (46.88%) vs. 6 (17.14%) p = 0.02). The relapse prevalence was 6 (17.14%) and 7 (21.88%) (p = 0.76), respectively. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was decreased significantly at 6 months in both groups (p<0.05), whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) level was reduced significantly at 6 months only in the TOF group (p = 0.007). The proportion of patients with imaging improvement was higher in the TOF group (eight (25.00%) and two (5.71%), p = 0.04). Side-effect prevalence was higher in the LEF group (11 (31.43%) vs. 3 (9.38%), p = 0.04). In conclusion, LEF and TOF were comparable for TAK treatment. TOF might be a potential agent to maintain disease remission at a low dose of glucocorticoids in TAK.

Comparing methotrexate monotherapy with methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis (COMPLETE-PsA): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, trial.

Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the preferred first-line treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis, although there is a paucity of evidence for the efficacy of conventional synthetic DMARDs and especially their combination. We aimed to investigate whether a combination of methotrexate plus leflunomide is superior to methotrexate monotherapy at improving disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. This single centre, investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Sint Maartenskliniek in the Netherlands (locations included Boxmeer, Geldrop, Woerden, and Nijmegen). Patients aged 16 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis and active disease (defined as two or more swollen joints; dactylitis counting as one swollen joint) were included. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) and stratified by high disease activity (psoriatic arthritis disease activity score [PASDAS] ≥5·4) to either methotrexate plus leflunomide (combination therapy) or methotrexate plus placebo (monotherapy), using computer-generated stratified variable block randomisation. In both groups, patients received oral methotrexate 15 mg per week for the first 4 weeks and 25 mg per week thereafter combined with two leflunomide 10 mg tablets once per day or two placebo tablets. During the study period, the patients, nurses, researchers, and treating physicians were all masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the difference in mean PASDAS at week 16, adjusted for baseline PASDAS, between the combination and monotherapy groups, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7404) on Dec 3, 2018. Between Feb 19, 2019, and March 11, 2021, 82 patients were screened for eligibility. Four patients were ineligible and 78 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either methotrexate plus leflunomide (n=39) or methotrexate plus placebo (n=39). 50 (64%) of 78 patients were male, 28 (36%) were female, and the median age of patients was 55·0 years (IQR 42·0-64·0). Methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy was superior to methotrexate monotherapy at week 16 (PASDAS 3·1 [SD 1·4] vs 3·7 [SD 1·3]; treatment difference -0·6, 90% CI -1·0 to -0·1; p=0·025). There were no study deaths. The most frequently occurring adverse events were nausea or vomiting (17 [44%] of 39 patients in the methotrexate plus leflunomide group vs 11 [28%] of 39 in the methotrexate plus placebo group), tiredness (9 [23%] vs 13 [33%]) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (12 [31%] vs 7 [18%]. Generally, the incidence of mostly mild adverse events was higher in the methotrexate plus leflunomide group than in the methotrexate plus placebo group. Methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy results in greater improvement in disease activity according to PASDAS in patients with psoriatic arthritis. However, methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy is less well tolerated than methotrexate monotherapy. Regional Junior Researcher Grant from the Sint Maartenskliniek.

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective study.

The clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LFN) at a dose of 10 mg/day in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is still unclear. We conducted this retrospective study to identify its efficacy and safety in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) at a dose of 10 mg/week. We enrolled RA patients who were treated in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2020, and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 criteria were adopted. The following data was collected: age, duration of disease, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody, white blood cell (WBC), and hemoglobin (Hb) level. The primary outcomes included the changes of the above variables and the incidence of adverse events after treatment in both groups. From January 2013 to December 2020, a total of 612 patients with RA treated in our hospital were screened. After excluding cases that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 33 cases remained in LFN group, and there were 59 cases in the MTX group. The baseline characteristics were similar between the LFN and MTX groups. After 24 weeks of treatment, there were still no significant differences between the two groups in all of the above variables. The infection rate was slightly higher in patients treated with MTX than those treated with LFN, while diarrhea episodes were more common in the LFN group. Our data indicated that compared with MTX at a dose of 10 mg/week, a low dose of LFN at 10 mg/day might be a preferable treatment choice for RA patients.

Clinical efficacy and safety of full-dose versus half-dose corticosteroids plus leflunomide for IgA nephropathy

BackgroundThe results of leflunomide (LEF) in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) were inconsistent.MethodsA total of 149 kidney biopsy-confirmed IgAN patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 and protein excretion levels ≥0.75 g/d were enrolled, with 65 subjects receiving half-dose CS plus LEF (LEF group), and the 84 counterpart patients accepting full-dose corticosteroid (Full CS group). The primary outcomes included the complete remission (CR) rates and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The secondary outcomes were the overall remission (OR) rates and a combined event (eGFR reduced ≥30%, end-stage renal disease [ESRD], hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or kidney transplantation).ResultsDuring the 18 months of follow-up, the CR rates were 72 and 64% in the LEF and Full CS groups (P = 0.299), respectively. The proportion of patients with OR rates in the LEF group and Full CS group was 89% versus 75%, respectively (P = 0.027). Serious AEs were observed only in the Full CS group (P = 0.017). The incidences of total AEs (P = 0.036) and infections (P = 0.024) were lower in the LEF group than in the Full CS group.ConclusionsLEF combined with half-dose CS is superior to full-dose CS in the treatment of IgAN.

Sustained Drug Treatment Alters the Gut Microbiota in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Several studies have investigated the causative role of the microbiome in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but changes in the gut microbiome in RA patients during drug treatment have been less well studied. Here, we tracked the longitudinal changes in gut bacteria in 22 RA patients who were randomized into two groups and treated with Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi formula (HQT) plus methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) plus MTX. There were differences in the gut microbiome between untreated (at baseline) RA patients and healthy controls, with 37 species being more abundant in the RA patients and 21 species (including Clostridium celatum) being less abundant. Regarding the functional analysis, vitamin K2 biosynthesis was associated with RA-enriched bacteria. Additionally, in RA patients, alterations in gut microbial species appeared to be associated with RA-related clinical indicators through changing various gut microbiome functional pathways. The clinical efficacy of the two treatments was further observed to be similar, but the response trends of RA-related clinical indices in the two treatment groups differed. For example, HQT treatment affected the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), while LEF treatment affected the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Further, 11 species and 9 metabolic pathways significantly changed over time in the HQT group (including C. celatum, which increased), while only 4 species and 2 metabolic pathways significantly changed over time in the LEF group. In summary, we studied the alterations in the gut microbiome of RA patients being treated with HQT or LEF. The results provide useful information on the role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of RA, and they also provide potentially effective directions for developing new RA treatments.

Comparison between leflunomide and sulfasalazinebased triple therapy in methotrexate refractory rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

To compare efficacy and safety of two different combination csDMARD therapy in Methotrexate-failed Rheumatoid arthritis patients. In this 24-week open-label, parallel-group non-inferiority, single-center clinical trial, Methotrexate-failed Rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease duration < 2years, were randomized to either of the two treatment regimens-Methotrexate + Leflunomide + Hydroxychloroquine or Methotrexate + Sulfasalazine + Hydroxychloroquine. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving EULAR good response at 12weeks. Non-inferiority of Leflunomide based therapy was confirmed if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval of treatment difference between the 2 groups was lower than the selected non-inferiority margin of (-20%) in primary endpoint at 12weeks. Secondary endpoints were improvement in DAS28, functional outcome and adverse events at 24weeks. 136 eligible patients were randomized to either Leflunomide or Sulfasalazine group (68 in each group).63 and 59 patients in Leflunomide and 66 and 61 patients in Sulfasalazine group completed 12 and 24weeks of trial, respectively. In Intension-to-treat analysis, EULAR good response was achieved by 58.8% and 54.4% patients (p = 0.7) at the end of 12weeks, and 61.7% and 64.7% patients (p = 0.8) at the end of 24weeks-in Leflunomide and Sulfasalazine group respectively. At 12weeks, the difference in EULAR good response with 2-sided 95% confidence interval between 2 groups was 4.4% (-12%, 20%) in intention-to-treat and 5.8% (-11%, 23%) in perprotocol analysis.15 and 21 adverse events were recorded in Leflunomide and Sulfasalazine group respectively. Parenteral Methotrexate was required more in Sulfasalazine group due to gastrointestinal intolerance. Leflunomide based csDMARD therapy is non-inferior to Sulfasalazine based csDMARD therapy in Methotrexate-failed Rheumatoid arthritis patients with comparable safety profile. Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02930343) dated 10.09.2016.

Jinwu Jiangu Capsule affects synovial cells in rheumatoid arthritis through PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Jinwu Jiangu Capsule is a medicinal formula from the Chinese Miao nationality. Leflunomide is recommended in organizational guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To investigate the effect of Jinwu Jiangu Capsule on PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal pathway in cells taken from RA patients New Zealand rabbits were administrated with Jinwu Jiangu Capsule suspension to prepare serum containing medicine. Lyophilized powder was prepared from this serum for cell treatment. The expression of LC3-II and PI3K, AKT, mTOR were detected by IF and western blot. Moreover, the levels of Atg1, Atg5, Atg14 were detected by RT-qPCR. The results showed that the expression of LC3-II was increased, and fluorescence spot of LC3-II was obvious in high-dose of Jinwu Jiangu Capsule group. Jinwu Jiangu Capsule decreased the level of PI3k, Akt, and mTOR protein, and increased the levels of Atg1, Atg5 and Atg14. Specially, the high-dose of Jinwu Jiangu Capsule had the most obvious inhibitory and up-regulation effects. However, there was no significant difference in the expression of Akt, mTOR and Atg1 in the medium-dose of Jinwu Jiangu Capsule group compared with the leflunomide group. In conclusion, Jinwu Jiangu Capsule regulates autophagy by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in RA.