IntroductionThis study investigated the impact of implementing hydraulic condensation (HC) as a second obturation technique in the Endodontic Preclinical course for dental students trained in warm vertical compaction (WVC). MethodsA total of 70 students performed root canal treatment of 2 extracted molars; they performed the HC technique for the first time after a demonstration. The combination of the obturation technique (WVC or HC) and the type of molar (maxillary or mandibular) was randomly assigned, resulting in 4 groups (n = 35). The students answered a questionnaire appraising their learning experience and completed a self-evaluation rubric. Masked instructors graded projects. Data were statistically analyzed (significance set at 5%). ResultsMost of the students (91%) considered learning 2 obturation techniques relevant and considered it difficult to perform the downpack in molars (P < .05). About half of the students (45.7%) responded that HC resulted in fewer errors and disagreed that WVC derives in a more homogeneous obturation; accordingly, 52.9% of the students selected the highest self-grading for HC obturations, while only 38.6% for WVC. No significant difference was found in the distribution of grades attributed by students and instructors (P > .05). Students reported significantly higher levels of confidence for HC and difficulty for WVC (P < .05). No difference was found between the techniques regarding the presence of voids. The presence of multiple errors was more frequent for WVC (P < .05). ConclusionThe findings indicate a positive learning experience and comparable performance among preclinical dental students in implementing HC as an alternative obturation technique.
Read full abstract