Lead For Treatment Research Articles

Randomized phase II evaluation of nivolumab (nivo), or relatlimab (rela), or combined nivo-rela lead-in followed by nivo-rela as first line therapy for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (mel).

9525 Background: A phase II study of nivo and rela was designed to evaluate the separate antitumor activity of nivo and rela vs. the combination for first-line treatment of pts with advanced mel. We report objective response rate (ORR) at week (wk) 4 and 16, progression-free survival (PFS) for pts receiving lead-in with nivo or rela vs. combination, and correlations with immune-related pathological response (irPR) at wk 4 tumor biopsy. Methods: Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to lead-in treatment with 1 cycle of nivo (480mg IV q4wk), rela (160mg IV q4wk), or nivo-rela followed by combination therapy in all pts. The primary endpoint was ORR to nivo-rela by RECISTv.1.1 at wk 16. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), ORR according to lead-in therapy at wk4, safety, and major pathological response on biopsy at 4wk (MPRbx) per Stein et al, Ann Oncol (2019). Results: The trial enrolled 43 advanced mel pts, median age=67 years, female=15 (35%), ECOG PS 0=34 (79%), BRAFmutant=18 (42%), Stage IV=35 (81%), and LDH >ULN=37 (86%). Pts were randomized to nivo=15, rela=14, and nivo-rela=14 lead-in arms. ORR at wk 4 were 3 (20%), 1 (7.1%), and 0 (0%) in nivo, rela, and nivo-rela lead-in arms, respectively. Among 41 evaluable pts who received at least one cycle of nivo-rela radiological assessment at wk16 was partial response (PR)=14 (34.2%), stable disease (SD)=15 (36.6%), and progressive disease (PD)=12 (29.3%). ORR at wk 16 were 6 (42.9%), 2 (15.4%), and 6 (42.9%) for nivo, rela, and nivo-rela lead-in arms, respectively. Median PFS for the whole cohort was 6.5 mos (95%CI 2.2-not reached [NR]), 4.7 mos, 1.8 mos, and NR in nivo, rela, and nivo-rela lead-in arms, respectively. After adjusting for BRAF status, rela lead-in was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR=3.41, 95% CI 1.11-10.4, p=0.03). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 14 (32.6%) pts. & TRAEs (any grade) leading to treatment discontinuation were observed in 9 (20.9%). After 1 cycle of nivo one pt developed myocarditis leading to death without proceeding to nivo-rela. MPRbx at wk 4 was observed in 11 (31.4%) of 35 evaluable pts and were 50%, 0%, and 43% in nivo, rela, and nivo-rela lead-in arms, respectively. MPRbx was associated with wk16 radiological response (p=0.04) and improved PFS (HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.87, p=0.03). Nivo-rela resulted in increased CD8 and CD4+FOXP3- cell densities at wk4 (p<0.01 and p=0.03, respectively) and CD8 density at wk 4 was associated with improved PFS (p=0.02). Conclusions: Nivo-rela results in 34.2% ORR and median PFS of 6.5m in pts with advanced mel after lead-in nivo, rela or combination therapy. This first single agent lead-in rela evaluation demonstrated wk 4 ORR of 7%, wk 16 ORR of 15.4% and median PFS 1.8 mos. MPRBx and CD8 density at wk4 are associated with improved PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT03743766 .

Abstract PO1-19-08: Phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy in combination with CD40 agonist and Flt3 ligand in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Only a subset of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) demonstrate response to FDA approved PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and few have durable responses. Data suggests that breast cancers have defects in antigen presentation and that antigen presenting cells especially the cDC1 subtype of dendritic cells (DCs) are required for response to ICB. CD40 agonists activate antigen presenting cells including DCs and B cells and repolarize macrophages to an anti-tumor phenotype. Flt3 ligand is a growth factor that increases differentiation and expansion of DCs. We recently demonstrated in pre-clinical TNBC models that the combination of liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy, a CD40 agonist, and a Flt3 ligand improves outcomes compared to alternate combinations. Methods: This is a single arm phase I pilot study of liposomal doxorubicin, CDX-1140 (CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody), and CDX-301 (recombinant Flt3 ligand) combination therapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced metastatic TNBC. Patients will be randomized to 3 lead-in arms (triplet therapy, doublet immunotherapy only, or liposomal doxorubicin only) for one cycle prior to receiving triplet therapy with tissue biopsies done before and after the lead-in treatment. CDX-301 will be given for only two cycles; liposomal-doxorubicin and CDX-1140 will be continued until disease progression or clinically limiting toxicities. Primary endpoint is determination of a recommended phase II dose based on treatment-related adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include anti-tumor immune response after triplet therapy, after immunotherapy alone, and after liposomal doxorubicin alone; median progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate. Key eligibility criteria are unresectable stage III or stage IV TNBC (ER ≤10%, PR ≤10%, HER2/neu negative), 1st to 3rd line treatment for metastatic disease (1st line patients need to be PD-L1 negative by 22C3 assay), measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, consent for pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies of amenable soft tissue tumor lesions, no prior treatment with an anti-CD40 antibody or a Flt3 ligand, no anthracycline treatment in the metastatic setting, no prior progression while on anthracycline-based therapy or within 6 months of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and no history of non-infectious pneumonitis or current pneumonitis. This trial will enroll up to 45 patients across multiple sites (NCT05029999) and is currently open at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Texas Oncology, University of Chicago, University of Texas San Antonio, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, and Johns Hopkins. Citation Format: Sangeetha Reddy, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Navid Sadeghi, Samira Syed, Cesar Santa-Maria, Virginia Kaklamani, Nan Chen, Denise Yardley, Yisheng Fang, Isaac Chan, Nisha Unni, Sarah Kashanian, Namrata Peswani, Shahbano Shakeel, Meredith Carter, Kelly Kyle, Farjana Fattah, Chul Ahn, Ina Patel, Joshua Gruber, Dawn Klemow, Glenda Delgado, Nicole Sinclair, Michael Yellin, Heather McArthur, Rita Nanda, Suzanne Conzen, Carlos Arteaga. Phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy in combination with CD40 agonist and Flt3 ligand in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-08.

Comparative Effectiveness of Ibrutinib Flexible Dosing Treatment Strategies on Time to Next Treatment in a Largely Community-Based Claims Database: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Introduction: Outside of a clinical trial setting, ibrutinib is the most well-characterized of the covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in the first-line (1L) setting. However, the impact of ibrutinib dose adjustment on clinical outcomes remains to be defined. In this real-world effectiveness study, we compared time to next treatment (TTNT) as a proxy for disease progression for dose adjustment and standard dose treatment strategies in patients with CLL/SLL receiving 1L single-agent IBR. Methods: This study utilized the Komodo Health payer-complete dataset, derived from U.S. health insurance claims from >150 private insurers covering >160 million individuals from 2015-2023; 53% of these patients are from community centers. Adult patients with CLL/SLL were included if they initiated 1L single-agent IBR 420 mg/day between March 2016 - April 2023 (IBR initiation date = index date; 1L single-agent IBR was defined as no other CLL/SLL treatment in the 12-month baseline period or within 28 days after index). A target trial emulation (TTE) approach was utilized to compare TTNT, defined as the time between the index date to the initiation of a next line of therapy (LOT), for two treatment strategies: 1) Dose adjustment strategy, defined as a lead-in IBR treatment at 420mg/day for 3-12 months, followed by dose adjustment to <420mg/day until next LOT or IBR discontinuation; 2) Standard dose strategy, defined as a continuous IBR treatment at 420mg/day without any dose adjustment for >12 months until next LOT or IBR discontinuation. The TTE approach minimizes immortal time bias in a naïve observational analysis as patients in the dose adjustment cohort cannot initiate next LOT before dose adjustment occurs [Hernan et al. Am J Epidemiol. 2016]. To explicitly emulate a target trial, two clones were created for each patient, with one clone contributing person-time and event to each treatment strategy of interest, respectively. A clone was artificially censored when the actual treatment path deviated from the assigned treatment strategy. Selection bias due to artificial censoring was corrected using time-varying inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW), accounting for post-index time-varying clinical factors related to IBR dose adjustment or IBR discontinuation. TTNT hazard ratio (HR; robust 95% confidence interval [CI]) was estimated using an IPCW-weighted pooled logistic regression model. Alternative lead-in periods with IBR standard dosing (3-6 and 3-9 months) were also evaluated. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk, defined as having a preexisting CV comorbidity or a high CHA 2DS 2-Vasc risk score. Results: 3,342 adults initiated 1L single-agent IBR at 420 mg/day. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 67.5 (10.6) years, 62% were male, and mean (SD) Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3.0 (1.5). The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 19.6 (7.5, 35.0) months. During the study period, 463 patients (14%) initiated a subsequent LOT. The high CV risk subgroup consisted of 2,640 (79%) patients. In the overall study population, 608 (18%) patients experienced a dose adjustment after the index date. Of those, the dose adjustment occurred ≤3 months, ≤6 months, and ≤12 months post-index in 159 (26%), 300 (49%), and 440 (72%) patients, respectively, with dose used at the first reduction of 70 mg, 140 mg, or 280 mg in 4 (1%), 85 (14%), and 519 (85%) patients, respectively. The dose adjustment strategy (420 mg/day for 3-12 months followed by a reduced dose) was not associated with increased risk of initiating next LOT (adjusted HR [95% CI] 0.95 [0.80, 1.14]) compared to the continuous standard dose strategy; results for the alternative lead-in periods and the high CV risk subgroup were consistent with the primary scenario. Conclusions: In this real-world comparative effectiveness study with the majority of patients from community centers, dose adjustment of 1L single-agent IBR treatment for CLL/SLL is not associated with an increased risk of initiating next LOT when compared to continuous standard dose treatment. These findings suggest that a flexible dosing approach with IBR may be an effective option to maintain an optimal balance of clinical therapeutic efficacy and safety for patients with CLL/SLL in the 1L setting.

U.S. patient preferences for long-acting HIV treatment: a discrete choice experiment.

Recent advances in long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) could provide new options for HIV treatment and reduce adherence barriers, if regimens are acceptable to patients. We elicited preferences for key attributes of potential LA-ART regimens among people with HIV (PWH) in the United States, focusing on four treatment modes (oral tablets, subcutaneous injections, intramuscular injections, and implants), product characteristics and location of administration. A discrete choice experiment was conducted among PWH aged ≥18 years recruited from HIV clinics in Washington State and Atlanta, Georgia from March 2021 to June 2022. Participants responded to 17 choice scenarios, each with three options: two systematically generated hypothetical LA-ART regimens and a constant opt-out (their current daily oral treatment). LA-ART regimen descriptions included treatment mode, pain, dosing frequency, location, pre-treatment time with undetectable viral load, pre-treatment negative reaction testing and "late-dose leeway" (i.e. flexibility or forgiveness in timing the next dose). We used conditional logistic regression, with an interaction between treatment mode and pain, to estimate preference weights for all attribute levels. Seven hundred participants (350 at each site) enrolled, with median age 51years (range 18-73); 70% identified as cisgender male, 24% as cisgender female and 6% as non-binary or transgender. LA oral tablets were the only mode preferred over current daily oral treatment, with annual implants and injections the next most preferred LA-ART option. Longer time between doses was preferred, and administration at home was preferred to clinics, which were preferred to pharmacies. Attributes with less impact on preferences included oral lead-in treatment to achieve viral suppression or test for negative reactions and late-dose leeway around the prescribed dosing interval. Participants in Atlanta were more likely to prefer their current daily oral ART than participants from Seattle. PWH in the United States may soon have several options for LA-ART. Our results suggest that LA oral tablets will be preferred by many patients over their current daily oral treatment, while implants and injections with longer duration may be acceptable to some. Future research should investigate sources of preference heterogeneity and actual uptake of and adherence to LA-ART products, when available.

Feasibility study to evaluate capabilities for conducting psychiatric clinical research within the Rwandan mental healthcare system

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large clinical trial within the Rwandan mental healthcare system that would establish the safety, efficacy and benefit of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) and...

Abstract OT2-17-01: Phase 1 trial of anthracycline chemotherapy in combination with CD40 agonist and Flt3 ligand in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Only a subset of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) demonstrate response to FDA approved PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and few have durable responses. Data suggests that breast cancers have defects in antigen presentation and that antigen presenting cells especially the DC1 subtype of dendritic cells (DCs) are required for response to ICB. CD40 agonists activate antigen presenting cells including DCs and B cells and also repolarize macrophages to an anti-tumor phenotype. Flt3 ligand is a growth factor that increases differentiation and expansion of DCs. We recently demonstrated in pre-clinical TNBC models that the combination of liposomal-doxorubicin chemotherapy, a CD40 agonist, and a Flt3 ligand improves outcomes compared to alternate combinations. Methods: This is a single arm phase I pilot study of liposomal-doxorubicin, CDX-1140 (CD40 agonist), and CDX-301 (Flt3 ligand) combination therapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced metastatic TNBC. Patients will be randomized to 3 lead-in arms (triplet therapy, doublet immunotherapy only, or liposomal-doxorubicin only) for 1 cycle prior to receiving triplet therapy with fresh tissue biopsies before and after the lead-in treatment. CDX-301 will be discontinued after 2 cycles; liposomal-doxorubicin and CDX-1140 will be continued until disease progression or clinically limiting toxicities. Primary endpoint is determination of a recommended phase 2 dose based on treatment-related adverse events including dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include anti-tumor immune response after triplet therapy, after immunotherapy alone, and after liposomal-doxorubicin alone; median progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate. Key eligibility criteria are unresectable stage III or stage IV TNBC (ER ≤10%, PR ≤10%, HER2/neu negative), 1st to 3rd line metastatic treatment setting (1st line patients need to be PD-L1 negative by 22C3 assay), measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, consent for pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies of amenable soft tissue tumor lesions, no prior treatment with an anti-CD40 antibody or a Flt3 ligand, no anthracycline treatment in the metastatic setting, no prior progression while on anthracycline-based therapy or within 6 months of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and no history of non-infectious pneumonitis or current pneumonitis. This trial will enroll up to 45 patients across multiple sites (NCT05029999). Citation Format: Sangeetha Reddy, Meredith Carter, Isaac Chan, Nisha Unni, Namrata Peswani, Dawn Klemow, Samira Syed, Shahbano Shakeel, Farjana Fattah, Chul Ahn, Yisheng Fang, Heather McArthur, Nicole Sinclair, Michael Yellin, Denise Yardley, Nan Chen, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Rita Nanda, Suzanne D. Conzen, Carlos Arteaga. Phase 1 trial of anthracycline chemotherapy in combination with CD40 agonist and Flt3 ligand in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-17-01.

Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Adolescents: 12-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Fluoxetine-Referenced, Fixed-Dose Study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). After 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a Brief Psychosocial Intervention (BPI) plus placebo, patients (aged 12-17 years) with MDD (DSM-5) who did not meet response criteria (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised [CDRS-R]; total score≥40 plus<40% reduction and a Parent Global Assessment score >2) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8 weeks of BPI plus double-blind treatment with vortioxetine 10 mg, vortioxetine 20 mg, fluoxetine 20 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change from randomization in CDRS-R total score at week 8; the primary comparison was the average effect of 2 vortioxetine doses vs placebo. Of 784 patients enrolled in the lead-in, 616 were randomized. At week 8, the mean change in CDRS-R total score averaged for vortioxetine doses was -18.01 (SE= 0.98) and the mean difference vs placebo was 0.21 (P = .878; not significant). For fluoxetine, the mean change in CDRS-R total score was -21.95 and the mean difference vs placebo was -3.73 (P = .015). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in≥5% of patients in either vortioxetine arm and at least twice more frequently than placebo were nausea, headache, vomiting, and dizziness. Patients in all groups showed reduction in CDRS-R scores by the end of the study, with no difference between combined doses of vortioxetine and placebo. The primary endpoint was not met, thereby rendering the study negative. The overall favorable safety profile of vortioxetine in an adolescent patient population was consistent with that seen in adults. Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-Dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Patients Aged 12 to 17 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02709746.

Phase II study of nivolumab (nivo) with relatlimab (rela) in patients (pts) with first-line advanced melanoma: Early on-treatment major pathologic response on biopsy.

9514 Background: A phase II study of nivo and rela was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and mechanism of this combination and components for first-line treatment of pts with advanced melanoma. Pts received lead-in treatment with 1 cycle of nivo (480mg IV q4wk), rela (160mg IV q4wk), or nivo-rela followed by combination therapy. We assessed the effect of each lead-in treatment on immune-related pathological response (irPR) at 4-wk biopsy to develop early biomarkers of antitumor response. Methods: Core biopsy of an index lesion was performed at baseline and after 4 wk on-treatment. Immune characteristics of pathological response were assessed on H&amp;E sections, including presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), neovascularization, proliferative fibrosis, plasma cells, and lymphoid aggregates. irPR score was calculated as described by Stein JE et al Ann Oncol 2019, from 0 (no irPR features) to 3 (major pathologic response on biopsy [MPRbx], ≤10% residual viable tumor). We assessed the association between irPR and radiological response (RECIST v1.1) at 4-wk evaluations. Results: The current cohort includes 22 pts, median age = 67, male = 13. Pts were randomized to nivo = 7, rela = 7, and nivo-rela = 8 lead-in groups. Two pts had no irPR evaluation due to early progression and unscorable tumor. Among 20 evaluable pts, proliferative fibrosis, neovascularization, plasma cells, brisk TIL, and lymphoid aggregates were identified in 50%, 35%, 26.3%, 25%, and 5% of cases, respectively. Lead-in nivo (n = 2/6), rela (n = 0/6), and nivo-rela (n = 3/8) resulted in irPR = 3 in 25% of pts. Radiological response was identified as partial response (PR) = 1/22 (4.5%), stable disease (SD) = 12/22 (54.5%), and progressive disease (PD) = 9/22 (41%). Among pts with PD, 44% received rela-, 33% nivo-, and 22% nivo-rela- lead-in. Pts with irPR score = 3 had radiological PR = 1, SD = 3, and PD = 1 at 4wks. No association was found between MPRbx and radiological response at 4 wks. Conclusions: Four-wk MPRbx may serve as an early biomarker of treatment response in advanced melanoma. Lead-in treatment resulted in MPRbx of 25% and was greatest with nivo-rela lead-in. Correlations between 4 wk MPRbx and later radiological responses, survival and other endpoints will be made at completion of trial accrual. Clinical trial information: NCT03743766. [Table: see text]

Phase 1 pilot study with dose expansion of chemotherapy in combination with CD40 agonist and Flt3 ligand in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

TPS1126 Background: Only a subset of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer demonstrate response to currently approved PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade, and few have durable responses. Antigen presentation defects may be a reason for this low response because deficiency of antigen-presenting DC1 dendritic cells is associated with poor anti-tumor immunity. CD40 agonists are a class of agents that activate antigen presenting cells including dendritic cells and B cells and also repolarize macrophages. Flt3 ligand is a growth factor that increases dendritic cells. In line with this, we recently demonstrated in pre-clinical models that the combination of liposomal-doxorubicin chemotherapy, a CD40 agonist, and a Flt3 ligand improves outcomes of breast cancer compared to alternate combinations. Methods: This is a single arm phase I pilot study of liposomal-doxorubicin, CDX-1140 (CD40 agonist), and CDX-301 (Flt3 ligand) combination therapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Patients will be randomized to 3 lead-in arms (triplet therapy, doublet immunotherapy only, liposomal-doxorubicin only) prior to receiving full triplet therapy with fresh tissue biopsies before and after the lead-in treatment. CDX-301 will be discontinued after 2 cycles; liposomal-doxorubicin and CDX-1140 will be continued until disease progression or clinically limiting toxicities. Primary endpoint is determination of a recommended phase 2 dose based on treatment-related adverse events including dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include anti-tumor immune response after triplet therapy, after immunotherapy alone, and after liposomal-doxorubicin alone; median progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate. Key eligibility criteria are unresectable stage III or stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (ER ≤10%, PR ≤10%, HER2/neu negative), 1st to 3rd line metastatic treatment setting (1st line patients need to be PD-L1 negative by 22C3 assay), measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, consent for pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies of amenable soft tissue tumor lesions, no prior treatment with an anti-CD40 antibody or a Flt3 ligand, no anthracycline treatment in the metastatic setting, no prior progression while on anthracycline-based therapy or within 6 months of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and no history of non-infectious pneumonitis or current pneumonitis. This trial will enroll up to 45 patients across multiple sites. Clinical trial information: NCT05029999.

ETNA-VTE Europe: Benefits and risks of venous thromboembolism treatment using edoxaban in the first 3 months

IntroductionEdoxaban had a positive risk-benefit ratio for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to conventional therapy with warfarin. The objective of this analysis of the ongoing ETNA-VTE Europe study was to assess the real-world benefits and risks of edoxaban during the first 3 months of treatment, the highest risk period for further VTE events. MethodsETNA-VTE Europe is a prospective, non-interventional, post-authorization study, conducted in eight European countries. Participants had initial or recurrent acute VTE (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) that occurred ≤2 weeks prior to enrolment and received edoxaban therapy. ResultsThe analysis set included 2672 patients (PE ± DVT, n = 1117; DVT only, n = 1555); mean age 62.9 ± 16.0 years, bodyweight 81.9 ± 17.4 kg, estimated glomerular filtration rate 95.4 ± 42.8 mL/min; 46.4% were female.Overall, 66.4% of patients (PE ± DVT, 68.5%; DVT-only, 64.8%) received heparin lead-in treatment for at least 5 days. Most patients (87.7%) received edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily.Event rates at 3 months were: recurrent VTE 0.34% (n = 9), major bleeding 0.97% (n = 26), all-cause mortality 0.79% (n = 21). Rates were numerically higher in the PE ± DVT group compared with the DVT-only group (recurrent VTE, 0.45% (n = 5) versus 0.26% (n = 4); major bleeding, 1.34% (n = 15) versus 0.71% (n = 11); and all-cause mortality 1.16% (n = 13) versus 0.51% (n = 8)). ConclusionsThe results support the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in a general VTE population during the most critical time period, the first 3 months. The outcomes of this study extend the principal efficacy and safety data on edoxaban into the routine clinical practice setting.

1532. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK) Modeling and Simulation of Long-Acting (LA) Cabotegravir (CAB) to Inform Strategies Following Dosing Interruptions in HIV-1-Infected Subjects

BackgroundCAB is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor under investigation as an injectable LA formulation for the treatment and prevention of HIV, and as a tablet formulation as an oral lead-in (OLI) and bridging treatment for dose interruptions. The monthly injection regimen of CAB LA and rilpivirine (RPV) LA was noninferior to standard oral therapy in maintaining HIV-1 suppression in Phase 3 trials. PPK modeling and simulation was used to inform strategies for managing dosing interruptions.MethodsA 2-compartment model with first-order oral and LA absorption and elimination adequately described the data from 1,647 healthy (28%) and HIV-infected (72%) adult subjects in 16 studies. Gender was a significant covariate on LA absorption; therefore, simulations of 5,000 virtual subjects were performed using a 4:1 male:female ratio to ensure 1,000 representative females and covariate sampling with replacement from the analysis dataset. One- to 12-week delays in dosing of the second, third, and fourth injection were simulated, and predicted troughs were compared with the 5th percentile (0.65 μg/mL) of trough concentrations following the first injection in Phase 3. Simulations of 1–2 months of oral bridging with CAB 30 mg once daily from time of a missed injection until CAB LA dosing resumed were performed, with the median Cmax (13.1 μg/mL) observed following oral CAB 60mg once daily in Phase 2b as an upper reference.ResultsProportions of subjects predicted to achieve target plasma CAB trough concentrations are shown by length of delay and injection visit in Table 1. Oral bridging with CAB 30mg once daily starting at the time of a planned missed injection is predicted to provide exposures within ranges observed in clinical studies (Figure 1).ConclusionDosing delays of up to one week appear to have minimal impact, but the effect is more likely to become problematic with longer delays, particularly in the first few months of dosing. Oral bridging provides therapeutic and safe exposures for planned interruptions in LA dosing. Regardless of use of oral bridging, simulations support resuming CAB LA dosing for interruptions <1 month (<2 months between injections) and reinitiating CAB LA with a loading dose and subsequent monthly injections for interruptions ≥ 1 month (≥ 2 months between injections). Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Exceptional responders to abexinostat (ABX) plus pazopanib (PAZ) in pretreated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and other solid tumors: Long-term follow-up of a phase 1b study.

3022 Background: We previously reported the initial phase 1b study results of PAZ + ABX, a potent pan-HDAC inhibitor, demonstrating acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity (Aggarwal et al. JCO 2017). We report the long-term follow up of exceptional responders and additional correlative analyses associated with clinical outcomes. Methods: Key efficacy endpoints included objective response rate and duration of response. Peripheral blood histone acetylation, HDAC expression, and plasma VEGF levels were analyzed and associated with clinical outcomes. Results: 51 pts (RCC subset; N = 22) were enrolled between June 2012 and October 2015. 10 pts (20%) had experienced disease progression on prior PAZ; 59% had received any prior VEGF-targeting therapy. 9 evaluable pts (18%) (N = 6 RCC; 2 thyroid; 1 mesothelioma) achieved partial tumor response (PR), of which 6 had prior progression on VEGF-targeting therapy. 7/10 (70%) of pts with prior disease progression on PAZ monotherapy had reduction in tumor burden on study. The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range 1.2 to 70+), and clinical benefit rate (PR or stable disease &gt; 6 months) was 33%. Five treatment-refractory pts achieved durable PRs lasting for &gt; 2 years duration, and one previously PAZ-refractory patient with RCC remains on treatment with ongoing PR for &gt; 6 years. Higher HDAC2 expression was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (median PFS 5.9 vs. 3.5 months, log-rank p = 0.02). Induction of histone acetylation on ABX lead-in treatment was associated with subsequent time to progression (p = 0.002). On-treatment plasma VEGF levels were inversely correlated with PBMC histone acetylation (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Markedly durable responses with PAZ + ABX are achievable, including in pts with PAZ- and VEGF-refractory RCC and other solid tumor malignancies. Host factors including HDAC expression and acetylation status may identify those most likely to benefit. A randomized phase 3 study is underway of PAZ + ABX as a first- or second-line therapy in pts with locally advanced or metastatic RCC (RENAVIV; NCT03592472). Clinical trial information: NCT01543763.

Beta2 -adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol increases protein turnover rates and alters signalling in skeletal muscle after resistance exercise in young men.

Animal models have shown that beta2 -adrenoceptor stimulation increases protein synthesis and attenuates breakdown processes in skeletal muscle. Thus, the beta2 -adrenoceptor is a potential target in the treatment of disuse-, disease- and age-related muscle atrophy. In the present study, we show that a few days of oral treatment with the commonly prescribed beta2 -adrenoceptor agonist, salbutamol, increased skeletal muscle protein synthesis and breakdown during the first 5h after resistance exercise in young men. Salbutamol also counteracted a negative net protein balance in skeletal muscle after resistance exercise. Changes in protein turnover rates induced by salbutamol were associated with protein kinase A-signalling, activation of Akt2 and modulation of mRNA levels of growth-regulating proteins in skeletal muscle. These findings indicate that protein turnover rates can be augmented by beta2 -adrenoceptor agonist treatment during recovery from resistance exercise in humans. The effect of beta2 -adrenoceptor stimulation on skeletal muscle protein turnover and intracellular signalling is insufficiently explored in humans, particularly in association with exercise. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study investigating 12 trained men, the effects of beta2 -agonist (6×4mg oral salbutamol) on protein turnover rates, intracellular signalling and mRNA response in skeletal muscle were investigated 0.5-5h after quadriceps resistance exercise. Each trial was preceded by a 4-day lead-in treatment period. Leg protein turnover rates were assessed by infusion of [13 C6 ]-phenylalanine and sampling of arterial and venous blood, as well as vastus lateralis muscle biopsies 0.5 and 5h after exercise. Furthermore, myofibrillar fractional synthesis rate, intracellular signalling and mRNA response were measured in muscle biopsies. The mean (95% confidence interval) myofibrillar fractional synthesis rate was higher for salbutamol than placebo [0.079(95% CI, 0.064 to 0.093) vs. 0.066(95% CI, 0.056 to 0.075%)×h-1 ] (P<0.05). Mean net leg phenylalanine balance 0.5-5h after exercise was higher for salbutamol than placebo [3.6(95% CI, 1.0 to 6.2nmol)×min-1 ×100 gLeg Lean Mass-1 ] (P<0.01). Phosphorylation of Akt2, cAMP response element binding protein and PKA substrate 0.5 and 5h after exercise, as well as phosphorylation of eEF2 5h after exercise, was higher (P<0.05) for salbutamol than placebo. Calpain-1, Forkhead box protein O1, myostatin and Smad3 mRNA content was higher (P<0.01) for salbutamol than placebo 0.5h after exercise, as well as Forkhead box protein O1 and myostatin mRNA content 5h after exercise, whereas ActivinRIIB mRNA content was lower (P<0.01) for salbutamol 5h after exercise. These observations suggest that beta2 -agonist increases protein turnover rates in skeletal muscle after resistance exercise in humans, with concomitant cAMP/PKA and Akt2 signalling, as well as modulation of mRNA response of growth-regulating proteins.

Change in tumor lysis syndrome risk after lead-in treatment in a phase 1b/2 study of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

7528Background: Venetoclax (VEN) is highly effective for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) during VEN initiation is a major risk and management, includ...

Optimizing clobazam treatment in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome

Given the complexities managing Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS)—comorbid conditions, multiple associated seizure types that tend to be refractory to treatment—dosage optimization of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment is a challenge. In the absence of clinical trial data on optimization of AED dosage in patients with LGS, dose titration is guided by personal experience, anecdotal evidence, and specific patient factors (age, comorbid conditions and medications, seizure types, etc.). The goal of this study was to determine whether a 20% increase in adjunctive clobazam was a reasonable benchmark for improved seizure response in patients with LGS who had responded to adjunctive clobazam treatment during a 12-week lead-in trial.This was a post hoc analysis of data from a long-term, open-label extension (OLE) study, which comprised patients who completed 1 of 2 pivotal clobazam lead-in studies. During the lead-in studies, patients received either placebo or clobazam (0.25, 0.50, or 1.0mg/kg/d) (maximum 40mg/d); during OLE, patients received clobazam up to 2.0mg/kg/d (maximum 80mg/d). The post hoc analysis population comprised patients who had ≥25%, ≥50%, or ≥75% seizure reduction from baseline during lead-in clobazam treatment and ≥12months of follow-up data during OLE. Successful dosage increase (i.e., dosage optimization) was defined as ≥20% clobazam dosage increase from OLE baseline, and improved seizure control from OLE baseline (improvement in seizure responder status, or >50% reduction in total seizure frequency). Patients were stratified by responder status after lead-in treatment (OLE baseline) and by lead-in clobazam dosage received.The findings of the analysis indicated that clobazam dosage increases of ≥20% during long-term treatment improved seizure control >80% of patients with LGS who responded to clobazam during lead-in treatment. Rates of successful dosage increase during OLE were high regardless of lead-in dosage received, with the highest rate of successful dosage increase among patients who received low-dosage clobazam during lead-in. Similarly, rates of successful dose increase were high regardless of lead-in seizure responder category, with the highest rates occurring in patients with the highest (≥75%) lead-in response.

Nivolumab for Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL): Results from the Phase 2 Checkmate 205 Study

Nivolumab for Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL): Results from the Phase 2 Checkmate 205 Study

Exploring the long-term safety of asenapine in adults with schizophrenia in a double-blind, fixed-dose, extension study.

PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to assess long-term safety with sublingual asenapine 2.5 or 5 mg twice daily (BID) in patients with schizophrenia.Patients and methodsActively treated patients on asenapine 2.5 mg BID, asenapine 5 mg BID, or olanzapine 15 mg once daily (QD) who completed a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and olanzapine-controlled study continued lead-in treatment in this 26-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, olanzapine-controlled Phase IIIB extension study; placebo patients were assigned to asenapine 2.5 mg BID treatment. Safety analyses were based on the all treated set (patients who received one or more doses of extension trial medication); change from baseline analyses used the acute study baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in laboratory parameters were monitored; weight change for asenapine versus olanzapine was the key secondary objective. Descriptive statistics were used; weight change was analyzed using a mixed-model repeated-measure approach.ResultsOf the 120 patients in the all-treated set, 60% completed treatment (asenapine 2.5 mg BID 66.1% overall, asenapine 5 mg BID 52.4%, olanzapine 15 mg QD 56.3%). The incidence of TEAEs was higher for placebo patients from the lead-in study who switched to asenapine 2.5 mg BID for extension treatment (71.0%) versus patients continuing asenapine 2.5 mg BID (38.7%), asenapine 5 mg BID (38.1%), or olanzapine 15 mg QD (25.0%). The most common TEAE (≥5% in every group) was worsening of schizophrenia. Least squares mean change in body weight from the acute study baseline to week 26 was +0.6 kg for overall asenapine 2.5 mg BID, +0.8 kg for asenapine 5 mg BID, and +1.2 kg for olanzapine 15 mg QD. There were no clinically relevant changes in metabolic parameters; values were generally similar across treatment groups.ConclusionAsenapine 2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID were generally well tolerated in long-term treatment. Weight gain was less for overall asenapine 2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID than for olanzapine 15 mg QD.

A randomized, controlled, open label phase II study of erlotinib (E) with or without the MET antibody emibetuzumab (Emi) as first-line treatment for EGFRmt non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have disease control after an 8-week lead-in treatment with erlotinib.

9019 Background: MET expression is a mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFRmt NSCLC and correlated with poor prognosis. Emi (LY2875358) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal bivalent MET antibody that blocks ligand dependent and independent HGF/MET signaling. This Phase 2 study compared the clinical activity of Emi + E versus single agent E in 1st line EGFRmt metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Stage IV, EGFRmt NSCLC pts with disease control following an 8-week lead-in E (150 mg PO QD) treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive Emi (750 mg IV Q2W) + E or E alone. Pts were stratified by ECOG PS, ethnicity, MET expression status, and response at the end of the lead-in. The primary endpoint was PFS from randomization. Additional endpoints included safety, OS, PK, and exploratory analysis of MET-expressing populations. Results: Out of181 pts enrolled, 141 pts were randomized (Emi+E: 71; E: 70). In the ITT population, median PFS for EMI+E was 9.3 months (m) compared with 9.5 m for E (HR = 0.89: 90% CI 0.64-1.23; p = 0.534). Exploratory analysis of MET-high expressing pts (MET 3+ expression in ≥90% of tumor cells; n = 24 pts) showed a 15.3 m improvement in PFS (EMI+E: 20.7 m; E: 5.4 m [HR: 0.39; 90% CI: 0.17-0.91]). No difference in PFS was observed in the complementary population (HR: 1.1 [90% CI: 0.7-1.7]). Similar frequencies of related AEs were reported for both treatment arms. Drug-related TEAEs that were more frequent ( &gt; 10%) for Emi+E were peripheral edema and fatigue (all grade 1 or 2). Emi serum concentrations were consistent with previously obtained PK results, and no apparent exposure-response was observed. Median OS in the ITT population was not achieved (NA) for either arm. In MET-high expressing pts, median OS was 20.6 m for E (90% CI: 8.87, NA) whereas it was not achieved for Emi+E (90% CI: NA, NA). Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in PFS was noted in the ITT population.Exploratory analysis confirmed that high MET expression is a negative prognostic marker for pts treated with E and indicated that these pts may receive clinically meaningful benefit from Emi+E. Clinical trial information: NCT01897480.

Long-term Safety of Asenapine in Pediatric Patients Diagnosed With Bipolar I Disorder: A 50-Week Open-Label, Flexible-Dose Trial.

BackgroundSublingually administered asenapine was approved in March 2015 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for patients aged 10–17 years with an acute manic or mixed episode associated with bipolar I disorder (BP-1). This is the first long-term safety and tolerability study of asenapine in this population.MethodsFollowing the 3-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients aged 10–17 years with an acute manic or mixed episode associated with BP-1, patients could enroll in this flexible-dose (2.5–10 mg twice daily) open-label extension (OLE) study for an additional 50 weeks, conducted from August 2011 to September 2014 in the United States and Russia. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed and predefined TEAEs of interest reported in addition to metabolic and anthropometric parameters. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Clinical Global Impressions scale in bipolar illness (CGI-BP) were used to assess effectiveness.ResultsA total of 321 patients (lead-in study treatment: placebo, n = 80; asenapine, n = 241) were included; 267 (83.2 %) reported one or more TEAE and 181 (56.4 %) discontinued early, 48 (15.0 %) due to TEAEs. Of the predefined TEAEs of interest, combined somnolence/sedation/hypersomnia occurred most frequently (42.4 %) followed by oral hypoesthesia/dysgeusia (7.5 %). In total, 109 (34.8 %) patients experienced clinically significant weight gain (≥7 % increase). No clinically meaningful changes were noted for laboratory parameters measured. Eighteen patients met the criteria for new-onset metabolic syndrome (MBS) post-baseline during the extension study, whereas 10 patients who met MBS criteria at baseline did not meet MBS criteria at endpoint. A total of 12 patients met MBS at baseline and endpoint. Mean change in YMRS total score from OLE baseline was −9.2 points at week 50, and change in CGI-BP severity overall score was similar among all treatment groups (those who initially received asenapine and those who initially received placebo). After 26 weeks of treatment in the OLE, 79.2 % of patients were classified as YMRS 50 % responders relative to acute trial baseline.ConclusionsAsenapine was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients with BP-1 during ≤50 weeks of open-label treatment; among predefined TEAEs of interest, the combination of somnolence/sedation/hypersomnia was the most common.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01349907.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40272-016-0184-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterised by joint pain, swelling and a limitation of movement caused by inflammation. Subsequent joint damage can lead to disability and growth restriction. Treatment commonly includes disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate. Clinical practice now favours newer drugs termed biologic DMARDs where indicated. To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four biologic DMARDs [etanercept (Enbrel(®), Pfizer), abatacept (Orencia(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), adalimumab (Humira(®), AbbVie) and tocilizumab (RoActemra(®), Roche) - with or without methotrexate where indicated] for the treatment of JIA (systemic or oligoarticular JIA are excluded). Electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for published studies from inception to May 2015 for English-language articles. Bibliographies of related papers, systematic reviews and company submissions were screened and experts were contacted to identify additional evidence. Systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness were undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A cost-utility decision-analytic model was developed to compare the estimated cost-effectiveness of biologic DMARDs versus methotrexate. The base-case time horizon was 30 years and the model took a NHS perspective, with costs and benefits discounted at 3.5%. Four placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for the clinical effectiveness review (one RCT evaluating each biologic DMARD). Only one RCT included UK participants. Participants had to achieve an American College of Rheumatology Pediatric (ACR Pedi)-30 response to open-label lead-in treatment in order to be randomised. An exploratory adjusted indirect comparison suggests that the four biologic DMARDs are similar, with fewer disease flares and greater proportions of ACR Pedi-50 and -70 responses among participants randomised to continued biologic DMARDs. However, confidence intervals were wide, the number of trials was low and there was clinical heterogeneity between trials. Open-label extensions of the trials showed that, generally, ACR responses remained constant or even increased after the double-blind phase. The proportions of adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar between the treatment and placebo groups. Four economic evaluations of biologic DMARDs for patients with JIA were identified but all had limitations. Two quality-of-life studies were included, one of which informed the cost-utility model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab versus methotrexate were £38,127, £32,526 and £38,656 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. The ICER for abatacept versus methotrexate as a second-line biologic was £39,536 per QALY. The model does not incorporate the natural history of JIA in terms of long-term disease progression, as the current evidence is limited. There are no head-to-head trials of biologic DMARDs, and clinical evidence for specific JIA subtypes is limited. Biologic DMARDs are superior to placebo (with methotrexate where permitted) in children with (predominantly) polyarticular course JIA who have had an insufficient response to previous treatment. Randomised comparisons of biologic DMARDs with long-term efficacy and safety follow-up are needed to establish comparative effectiveness. RCTs for JIA subtypes for which evidence is lacking are also required. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015016459. The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.