In this issue of TRANSFUSION two articles describe the effects on erythroid cells of antibody ligation to the red blood cell (RBC) membrane glycoprotein glycophorin C (GPC).1, 2 GPC is a monotopic high-abundance RBC membrane protein that forms a structural linkage to the membrane skeleton via the proteins 4.1R and p55. GPC derives from the GYPC gene, which additionally expresses GPC in a truncated form, glycophorin D (GPD). Glycophorins are extensively sialyated and contribute significantly to the zeta potential (net negative charge) that prevents systemic aggregation of RBCs by mutual repulsion. RBCs lacking both GPC and GPD are known as the Leach phenotype and have irregular ellipsoid shape. GPC and GPD express the 11 Gerbich blood group antigens,3 and three Gerbich-negative phenotypes are known, Gerbich (Ge:–2,–3,4), Yus (Ge:–2,3,4), and the aforementioned Leach phenotype (Ge:–2,–3,–4). Anti-Gerbich (notably anti-Ge3) has previously been noted as a cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN; and further described here by Pate and colleagues2), so knowledge regarding the immune destruction of the fetal RBCs is of relevance to the clinical management of these cases. The study of Wang and coworkers1 reveals that ligation using anti-GPC induces cell death in the erythroleukemic cell line K562 and erythroid progenitors derived from CD34+ umbilical cord blood stem cells. This process remains only partially characterized biochemically, but involves the exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) at the extracellular leaflet of the membrane (it is normally polarized to the intracellular face of the membrane). These findings confirm our earlier study,4 which interestingly also found that Gerbich and Yus phenotype cells lacked this pathway, despite binding anti-GPC on their surface. Thus, anti-Ge3 causing the HDFN described in previous studies, most likely induces PS exposure on fetal RBCs and induces their death and is clearly a different mechanism to that induced by anti-D which involves monocyte binding to the Fc region of RBC bound antibody. The GPC pathway induced by anti-Ge3 (and other anti-GPC) most likely is mimicking binding to the protein by an as yet unknown ligand(s), possibly on macrophages or other white blood cells. The mechanism of PS exposure induced by GPC ligation is also intriguing; the previously mentioned GPC-p4.1R-p55 interaction clearly must trigger the PS exposure in some manner. Indeed, p4.1R is known to bind PS and is regulated by calmodulin.5 It is therefore important that this pathway is unraveled as it may play a fundamental part in RBC turnover. It is somewhat puzzling that despite its huge physiologic significance, mechanisms of RBC turnover (dubbed eryptosis) remain relatively poorly characterized; this deficiency no doubt will be rectified based on the identification of the key RBC membrane proteins that appear to be involved. GPC is now among the candidates. The author is a member of the Transfusion Medicine Advisory Board (TMAB) for Grifols SA.
Read full abstract