Laxity Measurements Research Articles

Evaluation of retear rates following transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Functional outcomes and GNRB assessment with a mean 6.3 follow-up

The method of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using the tibia-dependent femoral tunnel technique is highly criticized. It would not allow anatomical placement of the graft and would therefore lead to a high rate of retear. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the rate of retear in ACL reconstructions using the transtibial tunnel (TT) technique and assess functional outcomes. The study included 148 patients (153 knees) who underwent ACL reconstruction with a minimum two-year follow-up period. Patients underwent clinical examinations, completed functional questionnaires (KOOS, Lysholm, ACL-RSI), and underwent laximetry measurements with GNRB at 134 N and 200 N. Two patients had retears detected on MRI and underwent revision surgery prior to the study, leaving 151 knees for evaluation. The retear rate was 6.6 %, with an overall rate of 7.8 % when including revision cases. Laxity measurements obtained with GNRB showed a strong correlation with functional scores, indicating worse scores with greater laxity differences (p < 0.0001). The retear rate observed in this study was at the higher end of those reported in the literature. The study indications for TT ACL reconstructions must be defined more specifically to reduce failure rates.Level of evidence: III (retrospective cohort study).

Impact of Joint Laxity on 2-Year KOOS Outcomes of Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The objective of this study was to determine relationships between intraoperative posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrificing posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) laxity measurements throughout flexion and patient outcomes at 2 years post-TKA and to define clinically relevant laxity thresholds to optimize patient outcomes.In a single-surgeon study, PCL sacrificing TKA using a robotics-assisted platform with a digital joint tensioning device was performed in 115 knees in 115 patients. Final intraoperative joint laxity was recorded, and 2-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOSs) were obtained. A Simulated Annealing optimization algorithm was used to identify medial and lateral laxity windows which maximized the 2-year KOOS pain score. Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to compare outcomes between groups.Significant associations were found between intraoperative joint laxity and 2-year KOOS pain outcomes throughout flexion. Clinically relevant laxity windows were defined medially and laterally in mid-flexion and flexion for improved outcomes, whereas only a lateral laxity window could be defined in extension. When all laxity windows were satisfied, a 14.5-KOOS point improvement was found (97.2 vs. 77.8, p = 0.0060) compared to knees which did not satisfy any window. Improvements in Activities of Daily Living (Δ8.8, p = 0.0143), Sports (Δ22.5, p = 0.0108), and Quality of Life (Δ18.7, p = 0.0011) KOOS subscores were also found in knees which satisfied all windows versus 0-1 window.Intraoperative joint laxity is associated with postoperative outcomes in a PS knee design, wherein patients balanced within identified laxity targets reported improved outcomes over those that did not. Clinically significant thresholds were defined and were predominately found in mid-flexion and flexion for medial and lateral laxity. When target windows were combined further improved outcomes were identified.

Large angular correction of arithmetic coronal alignment is associated with residual lateral laxity after total knee arthroplasty in varus knees for Japanese patients.

One of the most common types of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) is type I, which is characterised by varus alignment and apex distal joint line obliquity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of changes in arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) with both postoperative joint laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with CPAK type I following mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Of 111 consecutive knees in 92 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA, 80 knees (72.0%) with CPAK type I phenotype preoperatively were evaluated. All TKAs were performed to achieve neutral MA by a medial stabilising gap balancing technique. Pre- to postoperative change in aHKA was defined as ΔaHKA. The 80 CPAK type I knees were divided into a larger ΔaHKA group (>7°) and a smaller ΔaHKA group (≤7°). PROMs, including the Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12, were assessed before and 2 years after surgery. Pre- and postoperative joint laxity was assessed using a Telos arthrometer. Twenty-two knees showed a larger ΔaHKA, and postoperative lateral joint laxity in varus stress was significantly greater in these patients than in those with a smaller ΔaHKA (6.8° vs. 4.5°, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the groups in PROMs (p = n.s.). Postoperative lateral laxity was associated with larger aHKA changes than smaller aHKA changes in CPAK type I knees after TKA. However, no statistically significant differences in PROMs were found according to the amount of change in aHKA. Level III.

Comparison of postoperative clinical outcomes and knee stability of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using the tibia-first gap navigation technique with a computer-aided system and measured-resection technique: A retrospective analysis of a propensity-matched cohort.

This study aimed to clarify whether the range of motion (ROM), anterior and posterior (AP) stabilityand other clinical measures changed in patients who underwent tibia-first total knee arthroplasty (TF-TKA) using navigation with a computer-aided system after surgery. This is a retrospective study and we conducted a matched cohort analysis of 60 measured resection (MR)-TKAs and 52 TF-TKAs performed by a single surgeon. All the surgeries used the same implant and approach. Baseline differences between the groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. We compared each patient's measured ROM and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and performed knee AP laxity measurements by using a device during routine follow-ups. A total of 40 MR-TKAs with a mean age of 73.5 ± 5.6 years and sex (male 10, female 30) were compared to 40 TF-TKAs with a mean age of 74.0 ± 5.7 years and sex (male 13, female 27) at 2-year follow-ups. Two years postoperatively, there was a significant difference in the AP laxity at 30° of knee flexion between both groups (7.0 ± 3.4 mm vs. 5.2 ± 2.3 mm, p < 0.01). In contrast, no differences were found between both groups for knee flexion (120.8 ± 9°vs. 116.7 ± 9.8°, p = 0.07) and OKS score (41.8 ± 6.9 vs. 41.0 ± 5.9, p = 0.61). The AP stability in the midflexion obtained using the tibia-first technique remained consistent even after 2 years. However, OKS and ROM were not significantly different from those of the MR-TKA group. Retrospective comparative LEVEL III study.

Poster 312: Prospective and Randomized Evaluation of Three Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Techniques Including a Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis (LET): A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation at Minimum 20 Years Follow-Up

Objectives: Modern lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has shown promising results at short term follow-up but there is a lack of studies investigating the incidence of complication and lateral osteoarthritis (OA) at long-term. The aim of the study was to compare in terms of failure rates, clinical outcomes and OA incidence three different ACL reconstruction techniques including hamstring single-bundle (HS group), patellar tendon (BTB) and hamstring over-the-top with LET (LET group). Methods: Seventy-five patients were randomized to receive one of the three ACL reconstruction techniques. At the last follow-up, patients reported outcomes (PROMs), complication and reoperation were collected for every patient. An objective clinical evaluation was performed including anteroposterior laxity measurement (KT-1000) and pivot shift quantification (PS, triaxial-accelerometer). Clinical failures were considered patients with evidence of graft rupture or those with KT-1000 side-to-side &gt; 5mm or with PS side-to-side &gt; &gt;1mm/s2. A radiographic evaluation was performed to assess the incidence of tibiofemoral and patellar OA. Results: Final analysis was conducted on 61 patients (81.3%) at an average 23.0 ± 1.1 years follow-up, 38 patients completed the clinical and radiological evaluation. The LET group showed a higher Tegner score compared to the BTB (p=0.026), mean of 4.41 (up to 7) against 3.47 (up to 5). No difference was identified in the other clinical scores among the three groups (p&gt;0.05). Revision rate and clinical failure were respectively 15.8% and 57.1% for the BTB group, 4.6% and 38.5% for the HS group and 4.6% and 18.8% for the LET group (P= 0.09 to 0.8, ns). No difference in the quantitative evaluation of the Pivot Shift were reported, while AP side-to-side difference was lower in the BTB group compared to the HS group (mean -0.1mm vs. +1.5mm). Finally, the BTB group showed a higher rate of patellofemoral OA compared to the other two groups (p=0,009) while the incidence of lateral OA was not increased in the LET group compared to the other techniques (p=0.50). Conclusions: Satisfactory clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction at long-term follow-up could be achieved with different modern surgical techniques. However, the BTB graft was associated with increased incidence of patellofemoral OA when compared with the other techniques. Finally, LET was associated with increased sport participation and similar rate of lateral OA compared to other techniques at long-term follow-up.

Combined ACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis with a continuous iliotibial band autograft is a viable option in a population of athletes who participate in pivoting sports.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results, return to sport and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) associated with lateral extra-articular tenodesis using continuous plasty with an iliotibial band. This was a prospective multicentre study involving 186 patients who had surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Patients with multiligament ruptures and revision surgery were excluded from the study. All patients included were involved in pivoting sports and wished to resume their activity after surgery. Patients were assessed at a minimum 2-year follow-up using functional and psychological questionnaires (subjective International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner, Lysholm and ACL-RSI scores), ligament assessment including instrumented laxity measurement (Rolimeter), Lachman test and pivot shiftand isokinetic testing. Return to sport was assessed using a questionnaire, and complications and repeat surgeries were recorded. At a mean follow-up of 43.1 months, the subjective IKDC, Lysholm, ACL-RSI and objective IKDC scores were significantly improved (59.8 vs. 94.5 p < 0.0001, 75 vs. 99 p < 0.0001, 60 vs. 93 p < 0.0001, IKDC A 0% vs. 72%, B 12% vs. 27%, C 60% vs. 1% D 28% vs. 0% p < 0.0001). The Tegner activity level was 9 (3-10) before the accident and 9 (3-10) at the last review. Seventy-six percent of the patients had returned to sports at the same level. The differential laxity was 6.6 mm (±1.7) preoperatively and 1.1 mm (±1.4) postoperatively. Additionally, 97% were equal in pivot shift at the last follow-up. At the 6-month isokinetic assessment, the muscle strength recovery for the quadriceps and hamstring was over 85% compared with the healthy side for 79% and 70% of the patients, respectively. Ten patients had graft rupture (5.6%). Four (2.4%) patients had a contralateral ACL rupture, and seven (4%) underwent a reoperation with meniscectomy. Anterior ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis using a continuous strip of iliotibial band enables 76% of patients in a population with a high demand for sports to resume their activities at the same level. The clinical results and complication rates, particularly reruptures (5.6%), were similar to those of other techniques involving lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Level II.

A High Grade of Postoperative Knee Laxity Is Associated With an Increased Hazard of Revision Surgery: A Cohort Study of 4697 Patients With Primary ACL Reconstruction

Background: There is still debate regarding the association between arthrometric knee laxity measurements and subjective knee outcome and revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To assess whether arthrometric knee laxity (measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with the 1-, 2-, and 5-year subjective knee outcomes or revision ACLR at a 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study, Level of evidence 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft at the authors’ institution between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, with no concomitant ligamentous injuries, were identified. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer, 134 N) was assessed 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients who underwent revision ACLR at any institution in the country within 5 years of primary surgery were identified through the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Results: A total of 4697 patients (54.3% male) with available KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were included (normal: side-to-side [STS] ≤2 mm, 3015 [64.2%]; nearly normal: STS 3-5 mm, 1446 [30.8%]; abnormal: STS >5 mm, 236 [5.0%]). The only significant difference in subjective knee outcome between the groups was for the KOOS Symptoms subscale at the 1-year follow-up (STS ≤2 mm, 79.9 ± 16.2; STS 3-5 mm, 82.5 ± 14.8; STS >5 mm, 85.1 ± 14.2; P < .001). No other significant differences between the groups were found preoperatively or at 1, 2, or 5 years postoperatively for any of the KOOS subscales. The hazard for revision ACLR within 5 years of the primary surgery was significantly higher for the groups with an STS of 3 to 5 mm (6.6%; 95/1446) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07-1.87; P = .01) and an STS >5 mm (11.4%; 27/236) (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.69-4.03; P < .001) compared with the group with an STS ≤2 mm (3.8%; 116/3015). Conclusion: A high grade of postoperative knee laxity (STS 3-5 mm and STS >5 mm) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with an increased hazard of revision ACLR within 5 years, but it was not associated with an inferior subjective knee outcome.

Association between intraoperative findings and postoperative knee range motion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alleviates pain and improves daily living activities in individuals with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. However, up to 20% of patients have sub-optimal outcomes after TKA. No studies have clarified the intraoperative factors that affect postoperative range of motion (ROM) after cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. Thus, this study aims to clarify these factors. Patients with knee osteoarthritis with varus knee deformity who underwent CR-TKA between May 2019 and December 2020 were included in this study. One year after surgery, patients were stratified into two groups based on knee flexion: Group F (over 120∘) and Group NF (below 120∘). Patient backgrounds including age, body mass index, hip knee angle, preoperative range of motion for both extension and flexion, intraoperative center joint-gap measurements of 0∘, 30∘, 45∘, 60∘, 90∘, and 120∘ of knee flexion using a tensor, intraoperative anterior-posterior (AP) laxity measurements of 30∘ and 90∘ of knee flexion using an instrumental laximeter were compared between the groups. Univariate analyses between the groups were used to construct the initial model. The receiver operating characteristic curve was also analyzed. The predictive variables included in the final model were selected by stepwise backward elimination. Intraoperative AP laxity with 30∘ of knee flexion smaller than 10.8 mm was a significant positive prognostic factor (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.08-1.79, P= 0.011) of postoperative ROM over 120∘ of knee flexion one year after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 70.9%, 82.4%, 92.9%, and 46.7%, respectively. Intraoperative AP laxity smaller than 10.8 mm was a significant positive predictive factor for obtaining knee flexion greater than 120∘ one year after surgery when using CR-TKA and its PPV was high up to 92.9%.

DYNEELAX Robotic Arthrometer Reliability and Feasibility on Healthy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured/Reconstructed Persons.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are commonly assessed using clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging, but these methods have limitations in reproducibility and quantification. Instrumented laxity measurements using devices, like the DYNEELAX®, offer an alternative approach. However, to date, there is no human data on the DYNEELAX® and the reliability of these devices remains a subject of debate, and there is no consensus on appropriate knee tightening levels for testing. We hypothesized that the DYNEELAX®, with standardized knee tightening, would provide reliable measurements of knee laxity in adult volunteers. This prospective cohort study involved 48 pain-free adult volunteers. Laxity measurements were taken using a robotic-type motorized instrument (DYNEELAX®) on two separate occasions, at least 1 h and no more than 8 h apart, with knee tightening forces of 90 N ± 5 N. Metrics of anterior tibial translation and internal/external tibial axial rotations were recorded. The device displayed excellent intrarater reliability for all the metrics, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 0.96. Anterior translation exhibited the highest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96), with a minimum detectable change of 0.83 mm. DYNEELAX® is reliable in measuring knee laxity in adult volunteers when using standardized stabilizing knee tightening forces of 90 ± 5 N. The most sensitive measurement parameters (in terms of minimum detectable change as a proportion of the observed range) were anterior translation (in mm) at 150 N and secondary compliance.

Utility of Hertel’s exophthalmometer for measurement of eyelid laxity in floppy eyelid syndrome

Utility of Hertel’s exophthalmometer for measurement of eyelid laxity in floppy eyelid syndrome

Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in comparison to hamstring tendon autografts

Purpose One of the pillars of successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the choice of the ideal graft substitute. The central one-third of the quadriceps tendon is apparently a good autograft option, representing a modular reconstructive option with minimal donor site morbidity. The aim of this research is to compare the functional outcome of primary ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autografts in comparison to the hamstring tendon autograft. Patients and methods This prospective, randomized clinical study included 60 patients with torn ACL randomly divided into group I (the control group), whereby ACL reconstruction was performed using the hamstring tendon autograft or group II (the study group), whereby ACL reconstruction was done using the central part of quadriceps tendon pure soft tissue autograft. The study was performed in our hospital between January 2016 and March 2018. The mean follow-up period was 2.2 ± 0.4 years. Assessment was done clinically using the IKDC 2000 subjective and objective scoring system. Objective laxity measurements were performed using the KT-1000 at the end of follow-up. Results Clinical assessment of the patients in the 6th month postoperatively and at the end of follow-up averaged 2.2 ± 0.4 years according to the IKDC 2000 Subjective and Objective Scoring System and revealed significantly better results for group II in early postoperative after 6 months, with comparable results at the end of follow-up. Objective laxity measurements at the end of follow-up revealed that the side-to-side difference is a little bit better in the quad group with no statistically significant results. Conclusion The central part of the quadriceps tendon is a viable autograft option for primary ACL reconstruction with good mid-term functional results, and minimal donor site morbidity as compared with the standard most commonly used hamstring tendon autograft; however, a longer term and multicenter studies are still needed to validate its routine use.

Relationship Between Intraoperative Macroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Findings, Perioperative Surgical Findings, and Postoperative Clinical Outcome After Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

To assess how intraoperative macroscopical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) findings affect perioperative procedures, biomarkers, and postoperative anterior-posterior (AP) laxity and range of motion (ROM) after cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA)and to determine how chronic ACL deficiency may affect postoperative inflammatory biomarker, AP laxity, and ROM. A total of 121 patients with varus knee osteoarthritis without a history of ACL injury who underwent ATTUNE® (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) CR TKA were analyzed. Intraoperative ACL findings were stratified into intact, damaged, and diminished, according to the tension by probing, synovial coverage, and vascularity. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were examined at one, seven, and 14 days after surgery. Knee AP laxity measurements using Kneelax 3 (Monitored Rehab Systems, Haarlem, The Netherlands)and postoperative knee ROM were also compared. One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in CRP levels examined one day after surgery observed between the three groups (8.4 (3.8), 9.8 (4.3), and 13.2 (7.7) mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.018), with post hoc analysis showing that CRP levels one day after surgery were significantly greater in the diminished group than in the intact and damaged groups (P = 0.012 and 0.023, respectively). AP laxity in 30° of knee flexion was observed between the three groups (5.4 (2.3), 5.8 (2.5), and 7.1 (2.8) mm, respectively; P = 0.039), with post hoc analysis showing that AP laxity in 30° of knee flexion was significantly greater in the diminished group than in the intact group(P = 0.038). Knee ROM showed no significant differences. Intraoperative ACL diminishment was associated with higher CRP one day after surgery and midrange AP laxity one year after surgery.

Less Subsequent Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Following Primary Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation—A Retrospective Comparative Therapeutic Trial With 5-Year Follow-Up

To investigate patient outcomes, including revision rate, following primary bone patellar-tendon bone autograft (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without suture tape augmentation (STA) in a young and active cohort. All eligible patients who received primary BPTB ACLR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included in this retrospective cohort study. All patients receiving STA were augmented with the same device. Patients completed the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the visual analog scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, and the Tegner activity scale. Anteroposterior knee laxity was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Posterior tibial slope, femoral tunnel angle, and tibial tunnel placement were calculated for all patients. Subsequent surgical interventions and return to sport (RTS) were obtained from each patient. One hundred fourteen patients (52 BPTB ACLR with STA, 62 traditional BPTB ACLR) with a mean patient age <19 years and a mean final follow-up of ≥5 years were included. Compared with the control group, the STA group demonstrated significantly less subsequent revision ACLR (0 vs. 5, P= .036). All PROMs and KT-1000 measurements improved at final follow-up (P<.001) and were comparable between groups. There were no differences seen in either posterior tibial slope or graft tunnel placement between groups. More than 85% of the patients were able to return to the sport that led to their injury at full capacity with no differences seen in RTS rate, time to RTS, or level of competition between groups. Compared with traditional BPTB ACLR, additional STA appeared to safely and effectively lead to less subsequent revision ACLR while maintaining acceptable PROMs and objective joint laxity measurements in a young and active patient population. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Remnant-Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Results in Similar Clinical, Functional, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes to Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To compare a large cohort of patients who underwent remnant-sparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) with a matched group of patients who underwent anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with respect to clinical laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and functional testing. Patients who underwent rACLR between January 2010 and December 2015 were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and graft type to patients who underwent ACLR. The primary outcome measure was the ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) score at final follow-up of 24 months. Secondary outcomes included functional tests and clinical laxity measurements at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Concurrent intra-articular pathology at the time of surgery and postoperative complications were also recorded. Statistical analyses included the dependent t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A total of 210 rACLR patients were successfully matched to a corresponding cohort of 210 ACLR patients. There were no statistically significant differences in ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) or functional testing results between the groups; however, scores in both groups showed a steady and statistically significant improvement over time. A statistically significant difference was noted with respect to the Lachman test findings, favoring the rACLR cohort (Z= -2.79, P= .005); no between-group difference was seen for the pivot-shift test (Z= -0.36, P= .72). The rACLR group had a significantly lower rate of concurrent meniscal and chondral injury. There was no difference in complications between the groups (Z= -0.49, P= .63). There was no difference in patient-reported or functional testing outcomes in patients undergoing remnant-sparing compared with anatomic single-bundle ACLR. There was, however, a significantly lower rate of positive Lachman test findings after rACLR. Furthermore, the rate of concurrent meniscal and chondral pathology was lower in the rACLR group. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a single hamstring tendon graft and tape locking screw (TLS) fixation leads to good clinical outcome in two years of follow-up

BackgroundThere are many fixation methods for hamstring tendon autograft available for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The intention of this study was to report clinical follow-up data of the Tape Locking Screw (TLS) reconstruction technique. HypothesisDoes TLS method give good long term results in patient satisfaction and in clinical knee tests. Patients and methodsWe selected 119 prospectively collected patients with a two-year follow-up who had an ACL reconstruction using TLS technique. A total of 114 cases were available for follow-up two years postoperatively. The evaluation methods were instrumented laxity measurements, clinical examination and knee scores. ResultsThe Lysholm and IKDC scores improved from preoperative 76 and 50 to 95 and 90, respectively. Tegner activity level before surgery was 3 and improved to 6 at 2 years postoperatively. DiscussionACL reconstruction with TLS technique showed good objective outcome at the 2-year follow-up. We confirmed improvement in all evaluation method variables. Level of evidenceCase series; level of evidence, 4. Trial registrationISRCTN registry, study ID ISRCTN34011837. Registered retrospectively April 29, 2020.

Arthroscopic Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair Restores Anterior Tibial Translation Intraoperatively at Time Zero With No Additional Effect of Suture Augmentation

PurposeTo intraoperatively evaluate the ability of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair (ACLPR) to restore anterior-tibial translation (ATT) at time-zero, and to assess the influence of additional suture augmentation (SA) on ATT. MethodsPatients with proximal ACL tears undergoing arthroscopic ACLPR with dual suture anchor fixation (ACLPR-SA) were included in this time-zero clinical study. Lachmeter laxity measurements were taken to evaluate ATT stability preoperatively in the office (T0) as a standardized diagnostic tool, preoperatively under anesthesia (T1), at time-zero intraoperatively after ACLPR but prior to SA fixation (T2) and following SA fixation (T3). ResultsA total of 27 patients (35.1 ±12.0 years) with proximal ACL tears and significant preoperative (T0) ATT side-to-side difference (SSD) (mean ±SD, 4.1 ±1.5mm) were evaluated. ACLPR was shown to restore ATT SSD at time-zero (mean ±SD, 0.2 ±1.1mm), as a significant reduction in ATT SSD (mean difference ±SE, -4.7 ±.21 mm; p < .001) was achieved comparing pre- and intraoperative measurements after separate refixation of both ACL bundles with suture anchors. Additional SA fixation did not further decrease ATT, comparing measurements of the ipsilateral leg (IL) after ACL refixation and after fixation of the SA (mean difference ±SD, 0.03 ±0.22 mm; p =.496). ConclusionACLPR with dual suture anchor fixation restores time-zero ATT in adults with proximal ACL tears. Additional suture augmentation fixated in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT.Clinical Relevance: This study provides important information about the effectiveness of ACL primary repair in restoring anterior tibial translation. Suture augmentation with the knee fixed in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT, therefore augmentation may not overconstraint the knee or stress shield the repaired ACL.

Inter-Examiner Repeatability of Eyelid Laxity Measurements In Adults: Assessment of a Subjective Technique to Establish Normal Function

Inter-Examiner Repeatability of Eyelid Laxity Measurements In Adults: Assessment of a Subjective Technique to Establish Normal Function

Lower hamstring to quadriceps muscle strength ratio and lower body weight as factors associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in male American football players: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundPrevious studies have aimed to determine the use of certain risk factors in predicting the occurrence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Unfortunately, evidence regarding noncontact ACL injuries in male American football players is limited. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify intrinsic risk factors for noncontact ACL injury among male American football players. MethodsThis study evaluated 152 male American football players in Japan for potential noncontact ACL injury risk factors during a preseason medical assessment, including anthropometric, joint laxity, and flexibility, muscle flexibility, muscle strength, and balance measurements. A total of 25 variables were examined. Participants were monitored during each season for noncontact ACL injury, as diagnosed by physicians. ResultsNoncontact ACL injuries occurred in 11 knees of 11 players (prevalence; 7.1 %). Injured players were significantly more likely to have lightweight (P = 0.049). No statistically significant between-group differences were found for any other variables. Participants with a lower hamstring to quadriceps (H/Q) ratio (P = 0.04) were more likely to sustain noncontact ACL injuries. ConclusionLower H/Q ratio and lower body weight were significantly associated with new-onset noncontact ACL injury in male American football players. These findings will help develop strategies to prevent noncontact ACL injuries in male American football players.

Functional performance tests, clinical measurements, and patient-reported outcome measures do not correlate as outcomes 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PurposeThe results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are evaluated by laxity measures, functional tests, and patients’ perception by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). It is not known, if one of these evaluation instruments is representative or if outcome scores from all must be reported to obtain a full evaluation of the condition. The aim was to study the correlations between these three types of outcomes 1 year after primary ACLR.MethodAll adult patients (range 18–45 years) who had an ACLR between 1.1.2019 and 31.12.2021 were offered 1-year follow-up by an independent observer. Preoperative information about knee laxity and peroperative information about the condition of menisci and cartilage were registered. At 1-year follow-up clinical and instrumented knee stability and function assessed by four different hop tests were registered. Patients completed four PROMs (the Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Lysholm score) and Tegner activity scale and answered anchor questions regarding satisfaction and willingness to repeat the operation.ResultsA total of 190 adults attended the 1-year follow-up and 151 had all assessments. There were only a few positive and weak correlations between performance tests and PROMS and between clinical measurements and PROMS (r = 0.00–0.38), and the majority were of negligible strength. Tegner score had in general the highest correlation (low to moderate). The highest correlation was 0.53 (moderate) between the anchor question about patient satisfaction and Lysholm/IKDC scores. There was no difference in the correlations depending on meniscal condition.ConclusionsIn ACLR patients there was no clinically relevant correlation between scores obtained by PROMs, a battery of functional performance tests and instrumented laxity of the knee at 1-year follow-up. Therefore, one type of outcome cannot represent the others. This is an argument for always to include and report all three types of outcomes, and conclusions based on one type of outcome may not be sufficient.Level of evidenceII.

Outcomes of Slope-Reducing Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Combined With a Third Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure With a Focus on Return to Impact Sports

Background: An increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is a proven risk factor for both native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACL graft insufficiency. Anterior closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (ACW-HTO) for PTS correction is a validated procedure in revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined ACW-HTO and at least a second revision ACLR procedure on knee stability, function, and sports performance in a large series of patients. The hypothesis was that patients would return to impact sports after ACW-HTO combined with a second or third revision ACLR procedure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent a second (or more) revision ACLR procedure and ACW-HTO between June 1, 2015, and June 1, 2019, and had a PTS >12° were included. The mean age was 29.60 ± 6.31 years, and the mean preoperative PTS was 13.79°± 1.50°. The cases were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 2.96 ± 0.83 years (range, 2-5 years). At the last follow-up, the rate of patients returning to impact sports (based on the University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA], activity scale), ACL graft status (per magnetic resonance imaging), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lysholm scores, and laxity measurements using a knee arthrometer were recorded. Results: The total number of patients participating in impact sports and high-impact sports was as follows: 43 and 30, respectively, before the injury; 0 and 0, respectively, preoperatively; and 31 and 12, respectively, postoperatively. At the last follow-up, the UCLA score was ≥8 in 48.44% of the patients, and only 16 patients returned to their preinjury level of activity. At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, there was clinical improvement in the IKDC score from 37.98 ± 12.48 preoperatively to 69.06 ± 12.30 postoperatively (P < .0001), in the Lysholm score from 51.94 ± 14.03 preoperatively to 74.45 ± 11.44 postoperatively (P < .001), and in the UCLA score. However, this clinical improvement did not equate to preinjury values for all outcome scores (P < .001). The preinjury IKDC and Lysholm scores were 76.98 ± 11.71 and 89.26 ± 8.91, respectively. The mean change in anterior knee laxity using a knee arthrometer at 134 and 250 N was −4.03 ± 0.18 mm and −3.63 ± 0.16, respectively. There were 3 cases of a rerupture with a severe pivot shift on the clinical examination. None of these patients underwent revision per the patient's preference. Increased knee recurvatum was observed in one-third of the patients, but all were asymptomatic. Conclusion: In the setting of chronic ACL-deficient knees, PTS reduction (ACW-HTO) with revision ACLR restored knee stability and improved function with an acceptable rate of specific complications. Increased knee recurvatum was observed in one-third of the patients, but all were asymptomatic. Also, approximately half of the patients were able to return to impact sports.