MR. FRITZELL is assistant professor of English at Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin. This article is based on research done for his doctoral dissertation, Landscapes of Anglo-America During Exploration and Early Settlement (Stanford University, 1966). Landscape and land are different things. By landscape I mean essentially what is meant by the historian of the fine arts, a descriptive picture with a frame, with clear visual limits. But one can convey an idea of the land or express a feeling about the land without descriptive aids. Approaches and attitudes toward the environment, ideas and images of the land also constitute landscapes. They are the methods by which the facts of geographical existence are ordered and made systematic. American landscapes, as they have been created by writers and artists, have given rise to a perplexing set of conditions, reactions, and attitudes-sometimes comic, sometimes absurd, and almost never consistent. Intentionally or unintentionally, Americans have continued to see their land in terms of conventions and preconceptions borrowed from their European heritage or constructed and derived from traditional systems of thought. Seventeenth century Americans were too busy surviving, trading, shipping, fighting, building, and cultivating to be much concerned with conceptualizing or representing the land. Sixteenth century explorers, on the other hand, were forced to describe the New World-to represent, report, and order the new materials of experience. Explorers like White, Harriot, Laudonniere, Cartier, and Verrazano tried to come to grips with the American land, and we owe them a debt of recognition all too often forgotten. But however hard they tried these explorers were bound to the use of descriptive tools forged in the Old Country. Even in the face of famine and death, America re-
Read full abstract