Notary Law Research Articles

The Urgency of Implementing a Cyber Notary in Indonesia: A Comparative Study with The United States

Introduction: Current technological developments have an influence on all aspects of human life, including government administration. Notaries are non-governmental public officials who provide public services in providing good governance for the community. However, notarial services in Indonesia are carried out conventionally, which slows down notarial services. Different things happened in America. America is a country that has advanced technology.Purposes of the Research: The aim of this research is to analyze the urgency of implementing cyber notary in Indonesia, find differences in legal regulations and application of law regarding cyber notary in Indonesia and America and find the right solution in organizing cyber notary in Indonesia.Methods of the Research: The research used normative juridical method with secondary data from primary legal sources including various laws and acts like Law Number 2 of 2014, Law Number 30 of 2014, and others related to notarial acts, personal data protection, and blockchain technology in California and Illinois.Results of the Research: The research reveals Indonesia lacks comprehensive laws for cyber notaries. Learning from the US, which has established regulations, Indonesia needs to revise its Notary Law to incorporate cyber notaries and uphold principles of good governance.

Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding the Honorary Council's Approval of Summoning a Notary in the Examination of Criminal Cases

In writing this journal the author discusses legal issues regarding the Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning the Approval of the Honorary Notary Council for Summoning Notaries in the Examination of Criminal Cases. The Constitutional Court (MK) stated that it did not accept and rejected the judicial review of Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions regarding the examination of Notaries in the judicial process with the approval of the Notary Honorary Council ( MKN). The Petitioners argue that the phrase with the approval of the Notary Honorary Council in Article 66 of the Law on the Position of Notaries places the Notary Honorary Council as having absolute and final authority to approve or disapprove a notary's summons to attend a case examination. This means that investigators, public prosecutors and judges cannot take further legal action if the Notary Honorary Council does not give their approval. With the Constitutional Court's decision issued by the Constitutional Judge regarding Article 66 paragraph (1) of the Notary Law, a problem arises regarding the basis of the judge's consideration of the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the Honorary Council's approval of the summons of a Notary in the examination of criminal cases. The approval of the Notary Honorary Council in granting permission to the parties to take or notarize and examine the Notary remains valid. The Constitutional Court (MK) stated that it did not accept and rejected the material review requested by the Indonesian Prosecutors Association.

Legal Protection of Persons with Hearing Disabilities Associated with the Obligation to Read Deeds (Verlijden) For Notaries in Making Notarial Deeds

The Security Office Act (UUJN) contains legal provisions regarding the authenticity of recorded documents that are read but not heard by persons with disabilities; especially Article 16, Section 1, paragraph m of Law No. 16. Law No. 2 of 2014 on the Notary Public (UUJN) Regulation. The research questions of this study are: (1) How are certified texts read but not heard by deaf people; In this study, research methods based on law and theory are used. The data collection process was carried out through literature research. The results of the research show that: (1) Reading the work by the author with the help of a translator is valid if the actual production still complies with the regulations determined by the notary law. (2) The notary must be legal and impromptu, must include information on the official translation promise that the notary knows how to translate, and the face document at the end of the residence document. Making the work done by the notary on behalf of the hearing impaired people realistic, thus obtaining the legal rights of the hearing impaired as a service to the users and binding the legal goods on both parties, especially third parties.

IMPLEMENTATION OF CODE OF ETHICS SANCTIONS AGAINST NOTARIES WHO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEIR DUTIES

The Notary Code of Ethics sets the standards of behavior that Notaries must adhere to in order to act ethically and in accordance with the law. One of the sanctions for violations of the Notary Code of Ethics is dismissal with dishonor. This study aims to analyze the implementation of ethical code sanctions against Notaries who have committed criminal acts within the scope of their duties based on a final and binding court decision, which must go through a complaint process, and to analyze the ethical code sanctions in the form of dismissal with dishonor that can be imposed on Notaries who have committed criminal acts based on a final and binding court decision. Using a normative juridical approach, this research is prescriptive in nature. Data collection was conducted through literature study, presented in a systematically arranged narrative text, and analyzed qualitatively normatively. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the implementation of ethical code sanctions against Notaries who have committed criminal acts within the scope of their duties based on a final and binding court decision must go through a complaint process. In the process of applying ethical code sanctions to a Notary proven to have committed a criminal act while performing their duties, the Honorary Council can seek facts regarding the alleged ethical code violation committed by the Notary either after receiving a written complaint from members of the organization or the public who have been harmed by the Notary, accompanied by convincing facts and evidence of the alleged ethical code violation by a member of the association. This process indicates that efforts to enforce the ethical code against Notaries who commit criminal acts within the scope of their duties still depend on complaints from aggrieved parties. Ethical code sanctions in the form of dismissal with dishonor can be imposed on Notaries who have committed criminal acts based on a final and binding court decision. The decision to impose such ethical code sanctions is an appropriate and suitable step as a consequence for Notaries regarding the code of ethics and Notary Law (Undang-UndangJabatanNotaris, hereafter UUJN). The Notary Code of Ethics establishes standards of behavior that Notaries must adhere to, including acting ethically and by the law, as well as preventing similar violations. This indicates that the Notary profession and public interest take precedence over individual interests and is also an important step in maintaining the reputation of the Notary profession.

Analysis of the Principle of Notary Independence in Notarial Deed Making in Review of the Notary Position Law and the Notary Professional Code of Ethics

The position of notary is an office of trust and is a noble profession (officum nobile), in carrying out the duties of his office the notary is regulated by Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning the office of notary which has been amended by Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Office of Notary and also regulated in the Code of Ethics for the Notary Profession. in carrying out the duties of a notary has obligations and authorities, one of which is the obligation to be independent. In this study aims to analyze how the ideal regulation so that the principle of notary independence in making deeds can be carried out properly. this research is a notmative legal research where the author approaches the problem by studying the provisions of the applicable law and studying the views and doctrines in legal science relating to the obligation of notaries to act independently in carrying out their job duties. The Notary Position Law has actually provided a legal framework to support the independence of notaries in carrying out their duties. However, the application of this principle of independence in daily practice may depend on how the notary complies with the law and professional ethics and there is still a legal gap where there is no specific regulation relating to the independence or impartiality of notaries. The definition of notary independence in the Notary Law and the notary code of ethics is very limited, with no classification regarding the form of the law, as with the independence of judges who have a clearer classification, it would be better if the code of ethics of the notary profession explains in more detail regarding the independence of notaries in terms of structural, functional, financial, and independence in carrying out the duties of the office of notary.

Measuring the Criteria for Notary Accountability in the Use of Online Media as a Means of Notary Promotion in Indonesia

Purpose: This article aims to examine the criteria for notary accountability concerning the use of online media for notary promotion in Indonesia. Drawing on Gustav Radbruch's theory, the study analyzes the elements of intentionality, legal certainty, and the pursuit of profit, as outlined in the Notary Law and the Provisions of the Notary's Code of Ethics. Additionally, it explores the notion of the notary profession as an officium nobile, emphasizing its noble position and ethical responsibilities. Methods: The research methodology involves a theoretical analysis based on Gustav Radbruch's legal theory and relevant provisions of Indonesian law pertaining to notary accountability. Through a qualitative examination, the study delves into the criteria for notary accountability, particularly concerning the use of online media for promotional purposes. Legal principles and ethical considerations are applied to evaluate the implications of notary actions in the digital age. Results and Discussion: The analysis reveals that the criteria for notary accountability encompass elements of legal certainty, intentionality, and the pursuit of profit, as delineated in legal frameworks and ethical codes. Maintaining the noble position of the notary profession entails upholding ethical standards and adhering to legal norms, ensuring fairness and justice in notarial practices. The discussion emphasizes the need for holistic and ethical examinations in cases of alleged violations, to uphold the principles of justice and accountability. Implications of the Research: The findings of this study have implications for notarial practice in Indonesia, highlighting the importance of ethical conduct and legal compliance, particularly in the context of online media usage for promotional activities. By elucidating the criteria for notary accountability, the research contributes to enhancing professional standards and fostering public trust in notarial services. Originality/Value: This article contributes to the literature by examining the criteria for notary accountability within the framework of online media promotion, drawing on Gustav Radbruch's legal theory and Indonesian legal provisions. By addressing the ethical and legal considerations inherent in notarial practices, the study provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of notarial accountability in the digital age, thus adding to the body of knowledge on professional ethics and legal responsibility.

NOTARY'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DEED HE MADE IN DECISION NUMBER 126/PDT/2018/PT YYK

In executing his duties as a Public Official, a Notary must comply with the Notarial Office Regulations, the Code of Ethics, and also with the oath taken when appointed as a Notary, where the Notary is obliged to carry out his duties with trustworthiness, honesty, diligence, independence, and impartiality as stipulated in Article 4 paragraph (2) of the Notary Law. However, in Decision Number 126/PDT/2018/PT YYK, the Notary did not comply with these rules. The formulation of the problem in this study is: (1) What is the responsibility of the Notary for the deeds he made based on Decision Number 126/PDT/2018/PT YYK? (2) What are the legal consequences of the deeds made by the Notary based on Decision Number 126/PDT/2018/PT YYK? The research conducted uses normative juridical research with a legislative approach. The legal material collection technique is through literature study. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Based on the research results, the Notary who made the deed in case Number 126/PDT/2018/PT YYK did not adequately apply the principle of caution, causing one of the parties to suffer losses, and the results of the second research on the legal consequences of the Notary's deed should be revoked, but the judge has a different opinion.Keywords: Notary’s Responsibilities; Authentic Deed.

AUTHORITY OF NOTARY IN LEGALIZING THE UNDER-HAND AGREEMENT DEED: EXAMINING RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

This research examines the legal authority of notaries in legalizing underhand deed agreements based on their responsibilities and legal consequences. The method used in this research is normative legal research method, which is based on statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results obtained show that the responsibility of a notary in legalizing a deed agreement under the hand must be able to guarantee that he is able to carry out, implement, and realize the existence of laws governing the activities of legalizing letters under the hand including to see or check the validity of agreements made by related parties by being careful and disciplined in carrying out procedures for legalizing letters under the hand in accordance with the Notary Position Law. The legal consequences arising in the ratification of the agreement of the deed under the hand, namely if the letter has been legalized by the Notary, the letter under the hand has formal evidentiary power but does not have outward and material evidentiary power. In carrying out its duties, if a Notary is proven to have violated the law, it can be subject to civil sanctions in the form of reimbursement of costs, compensation and interest by passing the evidentiary process. However, a Notary cannot be convicted if they have not committed a violation of a criminal article and have acted in the interest of implementing the provisions of the Notary Law

FORCE MAJEURE AND NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY: THE CASE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF DEED MINUTES

Notaries, in carrying out their duties, have the authority to create authentic deeds, where authentic deeds serve as perfect evidence in court proceedings. According to Article 16 of the Notary Law (UUJN), the notary's obligation is not only to create authentic deeds but also to store them as part of the notary's protocol, which is a state document or archive that must be properly preserved and stored to prevent loss or destruction under any circumstances. The focus of this thesis is on the scenario where the notary's office, the place where all archives or protocols are stored, experiences a disaster or force majeure. The question arises whether the notary is still responsible for the destruction of the notarial protocol in such a case. The objective of this research is to examine and analyze the notary's responsibility for deed minutes that are destroyed due to force majeure and the legal construction of deed minute storage to minimize their loss due to force majeure. In this regard, concerning civil law liability, if the notary's negligence in safeguarding the notarial protocol results in losses for the parties involved, the notary's actions may be qualified as an Unlawful Act (PMH). PMH is regulated in Articles 1365 to 1367, stating that any unlawful act causing harm to others makes the perpetrator liable for the resulting losses. The legal consequences for a notary whose negligence leads to the loss or damage of deed minutes and failure to store them properly may result in administrative sanctions as stipulated in Article 9, paragraph (1), letter d of UUJN, which entails temporary suspension from the position of notary due to violating the obligations and prohibitions of the profession.

The Validity Of The Additional Obligations Of The Notary Profession Through PP Number 43 Of 2015 Of The Notary As The Reporting Party

The Indonesian government has enacted Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering, along with its implementing regulation, Government Regulation Number 43 of 2015 on Reporting Parties in the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes. This regulation designates Notaries as one of the reporting parties in Suspicious Financial Transactions related to Money Laundering (TFM), obligated to submit reports to the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK). Meanwhile, Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f of the Notary Law states that in carrying out their duties, Notaries must maintain the confidentiality of deed contents. Here, there is a contradiction between legal regulations. This study aims to examine and analyze the validity and legal consequences of the additional professional obligations for Notaries as stipulated in the Notary Law, supplemented by Government Regulation Number 43 of 2015, designating Notaries as reporting parties in TFM related to Money Laundering. The research indicates that the confidentiality duty of Notaries is not absolute; in other words, the obligation to maintain confidentiality in the Notary Law can be set aside by other laws, in this case, the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering through Government Regulation Number 43 of 2015, a directly authorized implementing regulation. The additional obligation as a reporting party cannot be considered a violation of the principle of notary confidentiality but rather a form of protection, with Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 9 of 2017 serving as an implementation of the prudence principle for Notaries in performing their duties. Furthermore, the legal consequences for Notaries, if they breach their duty as keepers of official secrets, may include criminal sanctions based on Article 322 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives, civil sanctions under Article 1365 of the Civil Code, and administrative sanctions under Article 85 of the Notary Law. Additionally, if a Notary fails to report suspicious financial transactions resulting in criminal activities, the Notary faces the threat of punishment as regulated in Article 5 of the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering, which includes passive involvement in money laundering crimes (Article 55 of the Criminal Code) and active assistance in criminal activities (Article 56 of the Criminal Code).

Notary's Position as aMediator in Resolving Disputes

A Notary is bound by Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notaries (Notary Law). According to the Notary Law, a notary cannot have a profession that interferes with his performance, including being a mediator. In reality, notaries are often found mediating parties faced with civil disputes. The problem that will be analyzed in this research is the position of a Notary as a Mediator for the parties regarding the Deed they make without violating the PJN code ofethics and how to implement mediation by the Notary for the parties.The type of research used is an empirical legal research method because it directly examines several notaries in Malang City.The results of this research state that a notary can act as a mediator in resolving ongoing disputes for the parties regarding the Deed they have made. Notaries can mediate disputes without violating the code of ethics for notary office regulations, as stated in Chapter II, article 2 of the Notary Code of Ethics. Anotary who carries out the function of a mediator can occur if the condition of the dispute or the parties have not found a mutual agreement. In the legal relationship regarding a legal act that they want to carry out, it is necessary to have a third party who helps to finda solutionand findagreementjointly representing the interests of the parties so that they can be resolved together

Simplification of real-estate contracts with the Land Administration System: a case study of Poland

This article examines the practicalities of Notaries Public using the Land Administration System for e-service transfer of property ownership. Herein, we use the example of the Polish Integrated Real Estate Information System (IREIS) in the activities of a Notary Public. Good governance and its genesis and IREIS developmental stages are initially assessed with emphasis on the functionality of the system and integration of the databases containing the information needed to prepare for notarial duties. The most important legal provisions applied to the conducting of professional duties by notaries are then discussed. These notably include the provisions of Notary Law and the Civil Code. Notarial tasks were then examined with regard to the possibility and admissibility of using the IREIS to accelerate their activities, decrease delays in essential formalities and minimize associated costs. Conclusions are drawn, and these include the forecast of future innovative solutions by e-service communication.

Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian oleh Notaris di dalam Menerima Uang Pemisah Sertifikat dan Pembayaran BPHTB

This research explores the implementation of the prudence principle by notaries in handling land certificate separation fees and BPHTB payments. As public officials, notaries play a crucial role in providing legal certainty and protection to the public. In executing their duties, notaries must maintain integrity and public trust by adhering to UUJN (Notary Law) and PMPJ (Principle of Recognizing Service Users). The study employs a juridical-normative method with legal and case-based approaches, conducting qualitative data analysis. In the acceptance of entrusted funds, notaries are required to ensure client identities, meticulously verify data, and maintain transparency and accountability. Although there is no explicit rule allowing notaries to accept BPHTB payments, some cases indicate notaries receiving funds from clients for these payments, albeit beyond their formal jurisdiction. Notarial responsibilities are based on the principle of error, encompassing actions, elements of fault, losses, and causality. Notarial errors can result in civil, administrative, and criminal liabilities. Therefore, the application of prudence, moral integrity, and compliance with the law are pivotal in preserving notarial responsibilities and public trust in the profession. This study emphasizes the importance of notaries adhering to prudence, understanding their boundaries, and facing legal accountability. Strict supervision and stringent penalties are necessary to raise awareness and deter notarial misconduct. Regulations concerning the notary's role in tax payments need reassessment, and the public should be educated about BPHTB payments to prevent issues with notaries. These measures are anticipated to enhance notarial integrity, public confidence, and legal certainty in Indonesia.
 

Legal Consequence Towards An Authentic Act That Was Not Ready By Notary And Not Signed Jointly By The Parties Based On Law Of Notary

It is not uncommon for procedures to deviate from the stipulated statutory provisions in the process of creating an authentic deed, particularly concerning bank credit transactions. This pertains to the procedure of reading and signing legitimate deeds prepared by a Notary, notwithstanding the Notary's responsibility to recite the deed in front of an audience, with at least two witnesses, and to have it signed simultaneously by the parties involved, the witness, and the Notary. The goal of this study is to evaluate the legal repercussions and obligations of a notary when a deed is not read by the notary and is not signed jointly by the parties. The descriptive-analytic method with a normative juridical perspective was used in this research. The research results show that legal sanctions for a deed that is not read by a Notary and not jointly signed by the parties will have consequences for the deed, namely reducing the evidentiary value of the original deed to a deed made privately. So, the accountability sanctions can be imposed on notaries, such as reprimands, dismissals, temporary termination from membership, even sanctions for dismissal (onzetting), and also dishonorable dismissal from associations, this is of course based on the Notary Office Regulations and their responsibilities that have been stated in the Notary Code of Ethics.

The Status Of Deeds Of Shareholders’ General Meeting Made By Notary Through Teleconference Media Based On The Law Number Two Of 2014

The provisions of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability companies, specifically Article 77 Paragraph (1), stipulate that a General Meeting of Shareholders (hereinafter referred to as GMS) can be conducted through teleconferencing. Naturally, this provision facilitates shareholders in convening GMS meetings. Yet, in this case, Law Number 40 of 2007 does not provide a comprehensive explanation of the procedures for organizing a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS). The organization of a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), wherein the minutes of the meeting are crafted directly by a notary in the form of an authentic deed, must conform to the regulations as stipulated in Law Number 40 of 2014 regarding the role and position of a notary. It is important to note that the minutes of a GMS conducted via teleconference, the aforementioned documentation, which will later be formalized into an authentic deed by a notary, must still adhere to the stipulations set forth in notary law. This compliance is essential due to the legal implications associated with the authentic deed and its impact on the notary's professional responsibilities. In this study, the normative-legal method was employed to analyze legal issues arising from and related to legal norms, as stipulated in statutory regulations. This approach was complemented by a library research method, specifically involving the examination of library materials. During this phase, the analysis of secondary data was conducted, encompassing an exploration of the legal norms, laws, and regulations applicable in Indonesia.

Legal Consequences of not Attaching Fingerprints to Minuta to Notary Deed

An authentic deed drawn up by a Notary as a general or public official becomes very important and is needed by parties as appearers. One of the Notary's obligations regulated in Article 16 (1) c explains that the Notary is obliged to attach letters and documents as well as the fingerprints of the person appearing on the Minuta Deed. However, what becomes a legal issue in this scientific research article is what if the appearer does not want to affix or attach his fingerprints to the minutes of the deed because Article 16 (1) c still contains a vague norm. So that the purpose of this scientific research article is to analyze whether the Notary is personally responsible for not including fingerprints at the request of the appearer and whether not including the fingerprints of the appearer in the minutes results in the position of the notary deed as an authentic deed. The method in this scientific research article uses the method of normative legal scientific research articles. The results of the analysis of this scientific research article show that first, not attaching or affixing the appearers fingerprints to a minutes of notary deed based on the request of the appearer itself remains the responsibility of the notary. Second, not affixing the fingerprints of the appearer on the minutes of the Notary Deed theoretically does not have any effect on the validity, but based on the evidentiary side this can be a consideration for the judge to then abort the minutes of the Notary deed under the hand. So, it is necessary to revise the provisions related to fingerprints in the Notary Law with the aim of clarifying and it becomes necessary to explain in more detail and detail the mechanism of affixing or attaching fingerprints to the minutes of notary deed.

Ratification of Notary Deed for Persons with Physical Disabilities

Signature is a formal aspect that must be fulfilled in making a deed. However, problems are often encountered in the field when the person signing is a person with a disability. So that the purpose of this research is to analyze the ratification of notarial deeds for persons with disabilities and how the urgency and legal implications of applying the fingerprints of the presence on the minutes of the notary deed. The method used in this research is a normative research method. The results of this analysis show that first, preventive legal protection for persons with physical disabilities in making deed before a notary is contained in Notary Law which is stated in article 44 paragraph (1) Notary Law. Second, attaching the fingerprints of the appearer to the minute of the deed is considered important to prove the appearer/appearers/the parties to the minute of the notary deed against denial of the signature in the event of a dispute in the future, as well as giving more legal force to the notarial deed.

The Urgency of Electronic Notary Protocol Storage in E-Notary Perspective

The more advanced times and technology oblige all elements in society to also participate in these developments, including in the context of the legal field, especially in the field of Notary Public, namely the electronic storage of Notary Protocols. However, there is still no regulation that clearly, unequivocally, and concretely regulates the electronic storage of Notary Protocols in positive law regarding notary affairs in Indonesia, resulting in a legal vacuum (vacuum norm). So, the purpose of this legal scientific research article is to analyze whether the urgency of storing Notary Protocols electronically in the perspective of e-notary and how the legal certainty of storing Notary Protocols electronically in Notary Law. The legal scientific research article method used is a general method, namely the normative legal scientific research article method. So that the results of this legal scientific research articles are first, there is no certainty about how to maintain and store the Notary Protocol to be prone to damage, loss and destruction when stored conventionally, even though in terms of urgency, electronic storage of Notary Protocols is very important to make it easier for Notaries, both in terms of economics and law. Second, the implementation of ENotary cannot be implemented because there is no legal certainty in the form of laws and regulations that specifically regulate services by Notaries in electronic form. So that there is a need for more specific rules that strictly regulate the mechanisms and responsibilities of Notaries in carrying out their duties and authorities in storing Notary Protocols and it is hoped that the government can create a legal umbrella regarding matters related to technology in the notary world in Indonesia.

Juridical Review of the Civil Dispute Peace Deed Made Before Notary

The purpose of this study was to determine the legal position of a civil dispute settlement agreement and to determine the role of a notary based on position in making a civil dispute settlement agreement. The research method uses descriptive methods to explain, describe, and describe in accordance with the problems that are closely related to this research, and comparative methods to find similarities and differences of opinion by experts to be used as a comparison. The results of the research The legal position of the Peace Deed made before a notary is an authentic deed, which has legal force that can be used as the strongest and most complete evidence. This peace deed guarantees the rights and obligations of the parties for the sake of certainty, order, and legal protection for interested parties in the civil dispute settlement process. Therefore, the peace deed is written evidence, the strongest and most complete and can make a real contribution to dispute resolution quickly and cheaply. The peace deed made before a notary has a legal standing against the court's decision as a complete means of proof and the authority of the notary in making a peace deed as his position as a public official authorized to make authentic deeds, the notary is also authorized to be a mediator as regulated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of a Notary (hereinafter referred to as the Notary Law) according to the Notary Law a notary may not.

Juridical Analysis of the Roles and Responsibilities of a Notary Against Deeds that are not read before the Parties

As a public official, a Notary has a role and obligation to ensure that what is in accordance with the wishes of the parties. A notary has the obligation to read the deed to the parties and write a statement of the circumstances of the appearer when he appears before the notary along with the reasons or statement of the deed not being read in the cover of the deed which is a provision contained in the law. If there is a misunderstanding between the parties regarding the preparation of the deed and causes ambiguity over the deed made, then the strength and usefulness of the notary deed needs to be questioned and also regarding the responsibility for the role of the notary who deliberately does not read the deed before the parties. In this study the aim is to examine further the role of the Notary in deed that is not read out before the parties and regarding the validity of the deed that is not read out. The research method used in this study is normative juridical, which is statutory research. It is carried out by examining problems using regulations that are related and relevant to the problem, in this case the rules that have to do with the field of notary law, namely UUJN and the Code of Ethics. Notary Public. The results of the study are that reading the deed is an obligation that must be carried out by a notary and if the notary's deed is not read out it will cause the deed to be null and void and the strength of proof becomes a private deed.