Latex FLC Research Articles

Urine immunofixation electrophoresis and serum free light chain analyses benefit diagnosis of multiple myeloma in orthopedic patients with normal serum total proteins, creatinine, calcium, and hemoglobin.

A substantial number of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have bone destruction are initially admitted into the orthopedic service at the hospital. However, routine laboratory testing usually fails to identify these patients, thus delaying optimal therapy. Therefore, there is a clear medical need for early diagnosis of MM in these patients. Between 2019 and 2021, 42 patients receiving treatment for orthopedic conditions had normal hemoglobin (Hb), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), creatinine (CREA), and blood calcium (Ca) levels before their surgical procedure(s) but were subsequently pathologically confirmed to have MM, based on their presenting orthopedic symptoms. During the same period, 52 patients with orthopedic conditions were pathologically excluded from the diagnosis of MM and were recruited into our control group. Serum free light chain (sFLC) testing was performed in 94 consecutive patients in the orthopedic service using Siemens N Latex FLC kits. The levels of Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca were also measured. All 42 patients with MM were divided into group A (n = 25: κ proliferation) and group B (n = 17: λ proliferation) by the pathology department. There were no significant differences in levels of Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca between group A and group B and the control group. However, the sFLC κ/λ ratio of group A and B was also significantly different from that of the control group (P < .001). The results of serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) testing demonstrated negative results in 14 cases (58.3%) in group A and 4 cases (25.0%) in group B. Some patients with orthopedic conditions who do not have typical MM laboratory results, such as those with abnormal Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca levels before their operation(s), actually have MM. MM should be highly suspected in patients with unexplained bone lesions and with an abnormal sFLC κ/λ ratio. Further tissue or bone marrow biopsy is needed in these patients even if serum and urine IFE results are negative and light chain ratio is normal.

Accuracy of determination of free light chains (Kappa and Lambda) in plasma and serum by Swedish laboratories as monitored by external quality assessment

BackgroundFree light chain (FLC) measurements are important in diagnosing monoclonal gammopathies. As FLC are heterogeneous, different reagents and instruments for measuring FLC concentrations may give diverging results that affect assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Here we investigated agreement between different FLC methods using data from the Swedish external quality assurance (EQA) programme. MethodsThe two main FLC assays, N Latex FLC (Siemens) and Serum Freelite (The Binding Site), using four nephelometric or turbidimetric instrument platforms, were compared. Results from 27 EQA rounds distributed to 11–16 Swedish hospital laboratories during 2015–2020 were investigated. ResultsThe kappa (κ) FLC measurements deviated significantly over time, but when only nephelometry was used, deviation from the mean was lower (median ranges: −5% to 13 %). The CV was significantly higher for the Freelite assay (mean CV = 8.7) than for the N latex assay (mean CV = 5.7) (p < 0.0001). The coefficient of determination between all combinations of reagents and instrument platforms used was generally good (r2 = 0.76–0.87), and the correlation slope acceptable (0.81–1.2). For lambda (λ) FLC measurements, no concordance between combinations of instruments and reagents is apparent, deviating between −40 % to + 48 % from the mean. The CV was significantly higher for the combination with nephelometry and the Freelite assay (CV mean = 13.9 %) than nephelometry and the N latex assay (CV mean = 9.9 %) (p <0.001). The coefficient of determination varied between combinations of reagents and instrument platforms (r2 = 0.59–0.89) and the slope ranged between 0.48 and 1.5. Significant differences between the two reagents used were sometimes noted. ConclusionsImprecision in λFLC affects the κFLC/λFLC ratio. This may be important in clinical assessment of patients, especially differentiating between monoclonal and polyclonal gammopathies.

Two Serum Free Light Chain Detection Systems in the Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma

To investigate the comparability of the Freelite, Binding Site, Beckman and N Latex FLC, Siemens in the detection of serum free light chain (sFLC) . Fifty newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients in Tianjin Institute of Blood Research from November 2019 to February 2020 were enrolled. The two systems (Freelite, Binding Site, Beckman and N Latex FLC, Siemens) were used to detect the sFLC of the samples. Outlier detection was performed by ESD method, methodological comparison and deviation assessment were performed by Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman regression. Both the systems could quantitatively analyze free kappa light chain serum samples and free lambda light chain samples. Freelite, Binding Site, Beckman and N Latex FLC, Siemens free light chain test showed FLC-κ：36.5 (6.5, 194), 40.5 (6.94, 288), FLC-λ: 30.1 (4.3, 170.5), 35.1 (2.28, 526), rFLC (FLC-κ/ FLC-λ) : 0.82 (0.05, 43.25), 1.03 (0.03, 32.04), dFLC (｜FLC-κ- FLC-λ｜) : -5.8 (-161.97, 183.7), 1.1 (-505.1, 279.01), which existed no outliers. There were systematic differences, and the deviation level was not within the clinically acceptable range. Both the systems can meet the needs of clinical diagnosis and treatment, but there is a significant deviation between the two systems, the results are not comparable, and should be analyzed separately. In particular, the same system should be selected for monitoring the prognosis of MM.

Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays\u2014implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma

The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended.

Performance evaluation of N latex FLC kappa and lambda reagents on the Atellica CH Analyzer

Performance evaluation of N latex FLC kappa and lambda reagents on the Atellica CH Analyzer

Prognostic value of involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio determined by Freelite and N Latex FLC assays for identification of high-risk smoldering myeloma patients.

Background Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic plasma cell disorder with a high risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). The serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio is a powerful prognostic factor for SMM: an sFLC ratio ≥8 has been reported to be associated with a high risk of progression to MM, and an sFLC ratio ≥100 has been described as a criterion for ultra-high-risk SMM, and has been integrated into the definition criteria for MM since 2014. However, all recommendations were based on sFLC measured using the first commercialized assay, Freelite™, while other assays are now available. We aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of N-Latex sFLC to identify high-risk and ultra-high-risk SMM. Methods The sFLC ratio was measured at diagnosis with both Freelite and N-Latex assays in a cohort of 176 SMM patients on a BN Prospec nephelometer. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic and laboratory data were collected at the time of diagnosis and at follow-up. Results Sixty-two patients (35.2%) progressed to MM within 2 years. Compared to Freelite™ sFLC, N Latex sFLC ratios ≥8 and ≥100 provided similar performances for the identification of high-risk and ultra-high risk SMM patients. Conclusions Our results evidenced that the N-Latex assay could be used for SMM monitoring, like Freelite. However, an N-Latex sFLC ratio ≥70 appears to provide similar performances to a Freelite sFLC ratio ≥100, with a slightly better positive predictive value. Both assays provided accurate identification of high-risk and ultra-high risk SMM patients. These results should be confirmed in an independent study.

Comparison of two serum free light chain assays for the diagnosis of primary plasma cell malignant proliferative disease.

Background and aimsThe serum free light chain assay (sFLC) is well established for aiding in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of plasma cell proliferative disorders. There are currently two commercially available sFLC immunoassays, Freelite, based on polyclonal antibody technology, and N Latex FLC, based on monoclonal antibodies. This study aimed to compare the analytical and clinical performance of these two assays in a Chinese population.MethodsThis study included 74 consecutive patients who were newly diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) including multiple myeloma (MM), AL amyloidosis, and light chain deposition disease (LCDD) between January 2014 and May 2015 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Alongside serum and urine electrophoresis analysis, the serum samples were retrospectively tested with both sFLC assays according to the manufacturers' instructions.ResultsThe two sFLC assays showed a moderate correlation for κFLC (Passing‐Bablok slope = 0.645, coefficient of determination (R 2) = 0.83, and Spearman coefficient = 0.904). However, for λFLC, a poor correlation was found (Passing‐Bablok slope = 0.690, R 2 = 0.39, and Spearman coefficient = 0.852). The concordance rate of κFLC, λFLC, and κ/λ FLC ratio were 83.78%, 75.68%, and 86.49%, respectively. The clinical sensitivity of the κ/λ ratios were 83.8% for the Freelite assay and 75.7% for the N Latex FLC assay.ConclusionAlthough the concordance and the clinical sensitivity of the two assays appeared comparable, a number of discrepancies were observed. There is a low correlation between the two assays in clinical practice, suggesting that the assays are not equivalent and, thus, current IMWG guidelines, based on Freelite, cannot be cross‐applied to N Latex FLC.

P96. Intrathecal immunglobulin synthesis: Sensitivity of kappa free light chains in cerebrospinal fluid to identify patients with oligoclonal bands

Objective Intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis can be present in inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system. The gold standard with highest sensitivity for intrathecal immunglobulin G synthesis is the measurement of oligoclonal bands (OCB). There is rising evidence that the determination of a kappa free light chains (KFLC) index has a similar sensitivity in the diagnostics of diseases associated with detection of OCB in CSF. While detection of OCB is time consuming and the qualitative result relies on experienced evaluators, KFLC measurement is a quantitative method that can be rapidly performed in a highly automated setting. In the present prospective study, we aimed to determine a nonselective optimal cut-off value for determination of the KFLC index in routine clinical CSF analysis. Methods 300 consecutive routine serum and CSF samples were measured on the Siemens BN Prospec using the Siemens N Latex FLC kappa Kit on the BN Prospec. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of KFLC for the prediction of OCB in CSF by quantile regression and ROC analysis. The assessed reference limits were prospectively validated in 100 consecutive samples as well as retrospectively in 50 OCB positive paired patient samples. Results Using quantile regression for establishing the 95% percentile of KFLC quotient in relation to Albumin quotient in OCB negative patients ( n = 266) revealed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 95%. The optimal cut-off value for KFLC index for OCB detection using ROC analysis was 4.93 with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 91%. After extrapolation for highest sensitivity to prevent false negative results the cut-off value for KFLC index was 3.56. Validation of this value prospectively in a second cohort of 100 patient samples revealed 88% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Testing this value retrospectively in 50 OCB positive patients revealed 94% sensitivity. Discussion The KFLC index cut-off value 3.56 has a high diagnostic accuracy for detecting intrathecal immunglobulin G synthesis in comparison with OCB. We conclude that KFLC index determination is suitable for a complementary diagnostic step before applying OCB detection as control and as qualitative evaluation of intrathecal immunglobulin G synthesis. By using automated KFLC tests laboratory work flow is optimized. Multi center studies and comparison of different methods are required to confirm the results of this monocentric study.

Kappa free light chains in cerebrospinal fluid to identify patients with oligoclonal bands.

The gold standard for detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis is the measurement of oligoclonal bands (OCB). In the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, the kappa free light chains (KFLC) index has a similar sensitivity and specificity as OCB. This study investigated whether determination of the KFLC index could be used to predict the presence of OCB. The KFLC index was determined prospectively from 295 paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples. KFLC were determined by nephelometry using the N Latex FLC kappa kit (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH) on the BN Prospec analyzer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH) (cohort I). A cut-off value was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis in relation to OCB positivity. These results were validated prospectively in 96 samples (cohort II) as well as retrospectively in samples of 46 patients known to be OCB positive (cohort III). We also compared the agreement of two commercially available nephelometric KFLC assays. In cohort I, a KFLC index of 3.61 yielded 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Prospective validation of this cut-off value in cohort II showed 92% sensitivity and 96% specificity. In cohort III, a sensitivity of 93% was achieved. Comparison of Siemens and Binding Site (Birmingham, UK) assays revealed good agreement (r2 =0.86). The KFLC index with a cut-off value of 3.61 had high diagnostic accuracy to predict immunoglobulin G synthesis via OCB analysis. Determination of the KFLC index provided a quantitative parameter that could be used as an initial diagnostic step in inflammatory central nervous system disorders before measuring OCB.

Clinical usefulness of serum free light chains measurement in patients with multiple myeloma: comparative analysis of two different tests

&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; There are two commercially available tests for measurement of serum free light chains (sFLC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients – Freelite and N Latex FLC. The aim of this study was to perform an assessment and direct comparison of the usefulness of the methods in routine clinical practice.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; 40 refractory/relapsed MM patients underwent routine disease activity assessment studies, along with sFLC analysis using both assays. Correlation and concordance between the tests and sensitivity of studied methods of sFLC assessment were established. Special attention was focused on sFLC results in patients finally evaluated after completing the treatment. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; A weak correlation for the measurement of both κ [Passing–Bablok slope (PB) = 0.7681] and λ chains [(PB) = 1.542] was found. Using Bland–Altman plots, a bias of 0.0467 (κ) and -0.2133 (λ) between the measurements was documented. The concordance coefficient equaled 0.87 for κ, 0.62 for λ and 0.52 for κ/λ ratio. Ten patients had an abnormal Freelite assay κ/λ ratio and normal N Latex FLC κ/λ ratio. Three of these patients had negative serum protein electrophoresis results and fulfilled diagnostic criteria of stringent complete remission (sCR) according to N Latex FLC (but not according to Freelite). When the κ/λ ratio obtained by both methods was compared to patients’ serum/urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation results, sensitivity of Freelite and N Latex FLC was established to be 62.5% and 41%, respectively. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; There was no strong correlation or concordance between the two assays, and the sensitivity in terms of sFLC detection was different. This may cause problems when diagnosis of sCR is considered.

Smart management of sample dilution using an artificial neural network to achieve streamlined processes and saving resources: the automated nephelometric testing of serum free light chain as case study.

Saving resources is a paramount issue for the modern laboratory, and new trainable as well as smart technologies can be used to allow the automated instrumentation to manage samples more efficiently in order to achieve streamlined processes. In this regard the serum free light chain (sFLC) testing represents an interesting challenge, as it usually causes using a number of assays before achieving an acceptable result within the analytical range. An artificial neural network based on the multi-layer perceptron (MLP-ANN) was used to infer the starting dilution status of sFLC samples based on the information available through the laboratory information system (LIS). After the learning phase, the MLP-ANN simulation was applied to the nephelometric testing routinely performed in our laboratory on a BN ProSpec® System analyzer (Siemens Helathcare) using the N Latex FLC kit. The MLP-ANN reduced the serum kappa free light chain (κ-FLC) and serum lambda free light chain (λ-FLC) wasted tests by 69.4% and 70.8% with respect to the naïve stepwise dilution scheme used by the automated analyzer, and by 64.9% and 66.9% compared to a "rational" dilution scheme based on a 4-step dilution. Although it was restricted to follow-up samples, the MLP-ANN showed good predictive performance, which alongside the possibility to implement it in any automated system, made it a suitable solution for achieving streamlined laboratory processes and saving resources.

Comparison of the Freelite serum free light chain (SFLC) assay with serum and urine electrophoresis/immunofixation and the N Latex FLC assay

Few reports have compared available serum free light chain (SFLC) assays. Here, a retrospective audit of the Freelite SFLC assay compared results to electrophoresis (EP)/immunofixation (IFX) and the N Latex FLC assay.A total of 244 samples collected over 3.5 months were studied using the Freelite and N Latex FLC nephelometry assays. Results were compared with serum and/or urine EP/IFX. The precision and linearity of the N Latex FLC assay was examined.Detectable paraprotein by serum or urine EP/IFX was present in 94% of samples with kappa and 100% with lambda FLC restriction. The correlation between the assays was higher for kappa (rho = 0.97) than lambda (rho = 0.89) especially when lambda results were above the upper limit of normal (rho = 0.62). Agreement in the categorical diagnosis as measured by the Cohen's kappa statistic was good (0.70). The N Latex FLC assay displayed good precision and linearity. In discordant samples the Freelite and N Latex FLC assays had equivalent agreement with IFX.Traditional methods of EP/IFX detected paraproteins in the majority of cases. Correlation between the Freelite and N Latex FLC assay is better for kappa than lambda FLC. The two assays are not entirely equivalent. Care should be taken by interpreting physicians and laboratories considering switching assays.

Retrospective audit of the freeliteTM serum free light chain (SFLC) assay: testing patterns, concordance with serum and urine electrophoresis/immunofixation and correlation with the N latex FLC assay

Aims A retrospective audit of the Freelite™ SFLC assay was conducted to compare concordance with electrophoresis (EPG)/immunofixation (IFX) and correlation with the N latex FLC assay. Methods 244 samples collected over 3.5 months were studied by nephelometry using the Freelite™ and N Latex FLC assays. Results were compared with serum (S) and/or urine (UEPG)/IFX. The precision and linearity of the N latex FLC assay were examined. Results 94% of samples with kappa restriction, and 100% with lambda restriction had detectable paraprotein by SEPG/IFX or UEPG/IFX. The correlation between the two assays was good for kappa (R 2 = 0.935) but not lambda (R 2 = 0.775) especially when lambda was above the ULN (R 2 = 0.406). Agreement in the categorical diagnosis of restricted SFLC was good (Cohen's kappa = 0.701). In discordant samples the Freelite™ assay displayed higher agreement with IFX (53% vs 47%). The N latex FLC assay displayed good precision and linearity. Discussion SFLC testing is popular despite traditional methods detecting paraproteins in most cases. Correlation between the Freelite™ and N latex FLC assays is better for kappa than lambda FLC. The two assays are not equivalent and the Freelite™ assay displays better agreement with IFX. Care should be taken by interpreting physicians and laboratories considering switching assays.

Response to Jacobs: N Latex FLC serum free light-chain assays in patients with renal impairment

Response to Jacobs: N Latex FLC serum free light-chain assays in patients with renal impairment

A multicentre study comparing two methods for serum free light chain analysis

Serum free light chain analysis is now well established in the investigation of monoclonal gammopathies. In the UK there has, until recently, been a single supplier of kits for such analysis. Recently, a second method using monoclonal antisera was introduced. We have compared the performance of these two kits in four routine laboratories. Samples submitted for routine analysis (327 samples, 258 [79%] from patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disease) for serum free light chains were tested by both technologies (Freelite, Binding Site and N Latex FLC, Siemens), according to the manufacturers' instructions. Qualitative data were available by both methods on 313 samples for serum free kappa chains and 324 samples for lambda free light chains. We found poor correspondence of 81% for kappa and 74% for lambda. Five percent of samples were significantly discordant in these assays. These assays perform very differently in clinical practice. They cannot be used interchangeably, especially if monitoring patient responses to therapy.

Comparative analysis of immunoglobulin free light chains quantification by Freelite™ (The Binding Site) and N Latex FLC (Siemens) methods

Serum immunoglobulin free light chain assay has proved to be an invaluable biological tool for diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies including multiple myeloma, primary amyloidosis, solitary plasmocytoma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Free light chain quantification, although essential, cannot be achieved by serum protein electrophoresis either because there is no monoclonal peak or because the peak is hidden in beta or alpha-globulin fraction. As for serum protein immunofixation, this major test allows the typing of the paraprotein but does not provide any quantitative evaluation. Hence, the development of free light chain assays constitutes a significant improvement in the management of these patients. In this context, we compared the results of serum free light chains quantification and of calculation of the ratio kappa/lambda, indicator of monoclonality, in forty samples performed on BN ProSpec(®) analyzer, with the two methods available on the European market. This comparative analysis provided evidence of a good correlation of results between the two methods. However, we noticed clinically significant differences in four samples. In addition, this evaluation highlighted the fact that all free light chain results must be biologically validated on the light of different criteria such as serum protein electrophoresis, serum protein immunofixation, presence of proteinuria, presence of renal failure, and additional clinical data, in order to ascertain the best interpretation for clinical use.