Repair Of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Research Articles

Concomitant internal joint stabilizer augmentation with isometric lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair for unstable elbow dislocations: a surgical technique

Complex unstable elbow fracture dislocations can be a challenging pathology to treat for orthopedic surgeons. Historical treatment methods of persistent elbow instability after bony and ligamentous pathology have been addressed include prolonged immobilization, trans-articular pinning, and static or hinged external fixators. However, they can be associated with significant complications and unacceptable rates of unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. As a result, a movable internal fixator known as an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) was developed to help mitigate these complications. The IJS, when utilized, often is inserted at the origin of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). The rotating humeral pin of the IJS must be placed in the elbow’s center axis of rotation at the distal humerus to function properly. The competition for the same footprint makes concomitant anatomic repair of the LUCL challenging. This paper seeks to describe a surgical technique that allows for isometric humeral pin placement of the IJS without sacrificing the ability to restore the LUCL to its anatomic footprint by combining the LUCL suture anchor and IJS humeral pin sites.

Clinical and Functional Results of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair for Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow.

Background Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow arises from damage to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). While various methods exist for reconstructing or repairing the LUCL's attachment to the humerus, the most effective approach remains debatable. This study aims to assess the outcomes of directly repairing the LUCL when the injury occurs at the humeral attachment. Methodology This retrospective study, conducted at the Royal Berkshire Foundation Trust NHS hospital in Reading, UK, assessed outcomes through a review of 15 patients who underwent direct repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament between 2017 and 2022, evaluating a range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the Nestor grading system. Results This study included nine males and six females, with an average age of 38.8 years. Most LUCL injuries arose from elbow dislocation (46.7%). The average follow-up period for patients was 26 months. At the final assessment, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score reached 99. According to the Nestor grading system, 12 patients achieved excellent results, and three had good outcomes. On average, there was an 11.3° loss of final extension and 5° of final flexion, yet achieving a comparable pronation-supination arch to the contralateral side. Conclusion Direct repair of the LUCL for elbow posterolateral rotary instability yielded excellent outcomes, obviating ligament reconstruction. Recognized as minimally invasive, it accelerates recovery, minimizes trauma, and offers a cost-effective procedure for managing instability.

Arthroscopic Modified Elbow Lateral Collateral Ligament Imbrication: An Operative Technique

When the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex fails to support the radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral joints in advanced stages of insufficiency, the patient experiences posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Open lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair with a ligamentous graft has been the standard treatment for PLRI. Despite producing good clinical stability rates, this method is associated with significant lateral soft-tissue dissection and a lengthy recovery period. By fastening the LCL to its humeral insertion, arthroscopic imbrication of the LCL can increase stability. The senior author modified this technique. With the aid of a passer, the LCL complex, lateral capsule, and anconeus may be weaved with a single (doubled) suture, secured with a Nice knot. LCL complex imbrication may be used to restore stability and improve pain and function in patients with grade I and II PLRI.

Biomechanical Stability of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair of the Elbow: The Role of Ligament Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization

Background: Augmented (internal braced) lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair has been biomechanically compared with reconstruction techniques in the elbow. However, LUCL repair alone has not yet been compared with augmented repair and reconstruction techniques. Hypothesis: Internal bracing of LUCL repair would improve time-zero stabilization regarding gap formation, stiffness, and residual torque as compared with repair alone and reconstruction techniques to restore native elbow stability. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Overall, 24 cadaveric elbows were used for either internal braced LUCL repair (Repair-IB) or single- and double-strand ligament reconstruction with triceps (Recon-TR) and palmaris longus tendon graft (Recon-PL), respectively. Laxity testing in external rotation was consecutively performed at 90° of elbow flexion on the intact, dissected, and repaired conditions and with the previously assigned techniques. First, intact elbows were loaded to 7.0-N·m external torque to evaluate time-zero ligament rotations at 2.5, 4.0, 5.5, and 7.0 N·m. Rotation-controlled cycling was performed (total of 1000 cycles) for each surgical condition. Gapping, stiffness, and residual torque were analyzed. Finally, these and 8 additional intact elbows underwent torque-to-failure testing (30 deg/min). Results: The dissected state showed the highest gap formation and lowest peak torques (P < .001). While gap formation of Repair-IB (P < .021) was significantly lower than that of repair without internal bracing at all rotation levels, gaps of Recon-PL were similar to and Recon-TR were significantly higher than those of Repair-IB except for the highest torsion level. Residual peak torques at specific rotation angles between native state and Recon-TR (α2.5), Recon-PL (α4.0), and Repair-IB (α5.5) were similar; all other comparisons were significantly different (P < .027). Torsional stiffness of Repair-IB was significantly higher at all rotation angles measured. Analysis of covariance showed significantly less gap formation over residual peak torques for Repair-IB (P < .001) as compared with all other groups. The native state failure load was significantly higher than Recon-PL and Recon-TR failure loads, with similar stiffness to all other groups. Conclusion: Repair-IB and Recon-PL of the LUCL showed increased rotational stiffness relative to the intact elbow for restoring posterolateral stability to the native state in a cadaveric model. Recon-TR demonstrated lower residual peak torques but provided near-native rotational stiffness. Clinical Relevance: Internal bracing of LUCL repair may reduce suture-tearing effects through tissue and provide sufficient stabilization for healing throughout accelerated and reliable recovery without the need for a tendon graft.

Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture-Tape Augmentation for Traumatic Elbow Instability

Ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation has been used in the operative treatment of joint instability and may have advantages with respect to early motion and stability. The purpose of this investigation was to describe the clinical results of traumatic elbow instability treated with lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation. All cases of acute and chronic elbow instability treated surgically between 2018 and 2020 were included if they underwent ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament as part of the procedure. Cases with <6 months of follow-up were excluded. A manual chart review was performed to record patient demographics as well as injury and surgery characteristics. Radiographic outcomes, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the visual analog pain scale and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, were recorded. Range of motion measurements were recorded at the end of the clinical follow-up, as were surgical complications. Eighteen cases were included with a mean follow-up of 20 months. Five (28%) cases involved a high-energy mechanism, and 11 (62%) cases involved terrible triad fracture dislocations. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and visual analog pain scale scores were 17 and 2, respectively. The mean flexion-extension arc was 124°, and 2 (11%) cases had <100° flexion-extension arc. There were 2 (11%) postoperative complications, and both cases had postoperative instability requiring reoperation. We observed no cases of capitellar erosion from the suture-tape material. For complex elbow instability, ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament results in acceptable functional outcomes and a reoperation rate comparable with other joint stabilization procedures. Therapeutic IV.

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Fixation Techniques for Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Ligament Bracing

Ligament bracing is a technique of suture reinforcement that can be used to augment lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair in the treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow, thereby improving early stability of the repair. However, multiple failures of the ulnar anchor during implantation have been documented. We hypothesized that the use of a cortical button for ulnar fixation of the ligament brace would be biomechanically comparable to a suture anchor construct. Sixteen elbows were tested with a materials testing machine. The intact, dissected, and repaired lateral collateral ligament complex was tested with a cyclic varus rotational torque of 0.5-3.5 Nm in 120°, 90°, 60°, and 30° elbow flexion. For the repair, the specimens were randomized into 2 groups: ulnar fixation of the ligament bracing using a suture anchor and ulnar fixation of the ligament bracing using a cortical button. The number of implant failures was documented. A load-to-failure protocol was conducted in 90° elbow flexion. Load to failure was comparable and was found to be 20.7 Nm in the suture anchor group and 21.8 Nm in the cortical button group. Laxity after ligament bracing did not differ significantly between suture anchor and cortical button fixation. Compared with the native ligament, the laxity was significantly reduced after ligament bracing. The failure mode was slippage of the suture tape through the humeral anchor in all cases. Additionally, the capitellum was damaged in 9 of 16 cases. A cortical button for ulnar fixation of the ligament bracing was comparable with a suture anchor fixation with regard to biomechanical properties such as laxity and load to failure. A cortical button fixation is less prone to failure of insertion. This would improve the implantation technique, while clinical results are expected to be comparable.

Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation

BackgroundSurgical treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) using primary repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex have proven inconsistent. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that augmentation of LUCL repair or palmaris longus tendon reconstruction using a suture tape augmentation would be associated with less rotational displacement and greater torque load to failure (LTF) compared with nonaugmented constructs.MethodsCadaveric elbows (n = 12 matched pairs) were used. Baseline stiffness and displacement values were obtained. The LUCL was transected followed by repair alone, repair with augmentation, reconstruction with palmaris longus graft, or reconstruction with augmentation. Specimens were retested including torque LTF. Paired t tests were performed to assess the biomechanical effects of augmentation.ResultsAugmentation was associated with higher LTF than repair and reconstruction alone (P = .008 and .047, respectively). Displacement was less with augmentation in reconstruction groups (P = .048) but not in repair groups. Suture tape augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than repair alone (P = .01). Although reconstruction with augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than nonaugmented reconstruction, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .057). Mode of failure for repair alone was predominantly suture pulling through repaired ligament. Augmented repairs primarily failed at the anchor-bone interface. Modes of failure for both reconstruction groups were similar, including graft tearing and/or slipping at the anchor.ConclusionWhen positioned in neutral forearm rotation and 90o of flexion to simulate postoperative conditions, augmentation of LUCL repair or tendon reconstruction using suture tape is associated with better resistance to rotational loads compared with nonaugmented repair or reconstruction, while maintaining near-native rotational stiffness.

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair with or without intra-articular fracture.

The pathoanatomy and biomechanics of elbow instability have been previously reported; however, few researchers have dealt with the operative management and clinical consequence of recurrent elbow instability. Recent studies on arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex repair have reported successful outcomes similar to those achieved by open repair. We aimed to determine the validity of arthroscopic repair of the LCL complex in elbows with unstable dislocation with or without intra-articular fracture. Eighteen consecutive patients who had undergone arthroscopic repair of the LCL complex for unstable dislocation of the elbow with or without intra-articular fracture and who were followed for at least 12 months were included in the study. Ligament injury combined with coronoid and/or radial head fractures were treated with arthroscopic technique. Pain, range of motion, clinical outcomes based on the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and surgical complications were evaluated. At 12 months follow-up, all 18 patients demonstrated complete settlement of the instability and mean (and standard deviation) extension of 1.7 ± 3.8°, flexion of 138.3 ± 3.8°, supination of 88.6 ± 5.3°, and pronation of 88.2 ± 5.6°. The average MEPS was 97.7 ± 3.9 points and according to this validated outcome score. However, slight widening (2 mm) of the radiocapitellar joint space was accompanied in one patient, although the varus stress test and pivot shift test were not observed. One patient showed delayed union of the anteromedial facet fracture, and two patients showed pin site irritation, which was a complication of arthroscopic coronoid fracture fixation and was fully resolved after pin removal. In patients with unstable elbow dislocation, with or without an intra-articular fracture, arthroscopic repair of the LCL complex is an effective and alternative treatment option that can restore elbow stability and have satisfactory clinical and radiographic results.

Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair of the Elbow Using a Cortical Button

Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair of the Elbow Using a Cortical Button

Posteromedial rotatory incongruity of the elbow: a computational kinematics study

Our objective was to analyze the effect of different anteromedial coronoid fracture patterns with different combinations of ligamentous repairs. We hypothesized that smaller fractures would be sufficiently treated with ligamentous repair alone but that larger fragments would require a combination of ligament and bony repair versus reconstruction. Two multibody models were created from cadaveric specimens in the ADAMS program. Four different conditions were simulated: (1) no fracture, (2) O'Driscoll anteromedial subtype I (2.5-mm) fracture, (3) subtype II 2.5-mm fracture, and (4) subtype II 5-mm fracture. In each of these conditions, 3 ligament repairs were studied: lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (pMCL), and both LUCL and pMCL. For each condition, kinematics and articular contact areas were calculated. LUCL repair alone increases whereas pMCL repair decreases internal rotation of the ulna relative to all tested posteromedial rotatory instability conditions; their rotational effects are summative when both ligaments are repaired. With a subtype I fracture and both pMCL and LUCL injuries, repairing the LUCL alone corrects angulation whereas rotational stability is satisfactory through the arc from 0° to 90°. In a subtype II 2.5-mm fracture, isolated repair of the LUCL or pMCL is not capable of restoring rotation or angulation. For a subtype II 5-mm fracture, no combination of ligamentous repairs could restore rotation or angulation. This study suggests that LUCL repair alone is sufficient to restore kinematics for small subtype I fractures for an arc avoiding deep flexion; whereas nearly normal kinematics throughout the arc of motion can be achieved if the pMCL is also repaired. Larger anteromedial coronoid fractures should ideally have fragments fixed in addition to ligament repairs.

Strategic approach to O’Driscoll type 2 anteromedial coronoid facet fracture

The purpose of this study was to suggest a strategic approach to the management of anteromedial coronoid facet (AMCF) fracture that is related to posteromedial rotational instability of the elbow through investigation of the surgical outcome of diverse combinations, including internal fixation of AMCF fractures and repair of collateral ligament injury. The study enrolled 18 patients. On the basis of the size of the coronoid fracture and the degree of the soft tissue injuries that were evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and varus stress test under anesthesia, these fractures were managed differently. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale score, modified Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Plain radiographs were used to evaluate the degree of arthrosis. There were 2 cases of O'Driscoll type 2, subtype 1 fractures; 14 cases of type 2, subtype 2 fractures; and 2 cases of type 2, subtype 3 fractures. Seven cases were managed with only AMCF fracture fixation, 4 cases with only lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair, 6 cases with concomitant repair of the LUCL and AMCF fracture, and 1 case with a conservative method. There were no significant differences among O'Driscoll types and among the subgroups of type 2-2 (P > .05). When the elbow showed instability on the varus stress test after AMCF fracture fixation, the soft tissue injuries of the lateral elbow were more severe (P =. 015). Arthrosis was not correlated with the patient's symptoms (P > .05). AMCF fracture can be treated by only AMCF fracture fixation, only LUCL repair, or a combination of these techniques, depending on the size of the AMCF fracture fragment and the degree of the lateral soft tissue injuries.

Fixation of the Coronoid Process in Elbow Fracture-Dislocations

Terrible triad injuries consist of a posterior dislocation of the elbow, a coronoid fracture, and a radial head fracture. The coronoid plays a pivotal role as an anterior buttress, yet the optimal management of the coronoid fracture remains unknown. We hypothesize that suture lasso fixation of the coronoid fracture leads to fewer complications and improved outcomes compared with screw or suture anchor fixation techniques. A retrospective chart review performed at three tertiary care centers identified forty consecutive patients treated for terrible triad injuries of the elbow with a minimum follow-up of eighteen months (mean, twenty-four months; range, eighteen to fifty-three months). All patients were managed with a standard approach consisting of: (1) repair or replacement of the radial head; (2) repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) of the elbow; and (3) repair of the coronoid fracture with one of two techniques: Group I (n = 28) consisted of the "lasso" technique and Group II (n = 12) consisted of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with screws or suture anchors. For the study population, the mean postoperative arc of elbow motion was 115° (range, 75° to 140°), the average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 16 (range, 0 to 43), and the average Broberg-Morrey score was 90 (range, 64 to 100). For repair of the coronoid fracture, the suture lasso technique was more stable than the other techniques intraoperatively, both before (p < 0.05) and after (p < 0.05) LUCL repair, and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). ORIF was associated with a higher prevalence of implant failure (p < 0.05), and suture anchors were associated with a higher prevalence of malunion and nonunion (p < 0.05). For terrible triad injuries, greater stability with fewer complications was achieved with use of the suture lasso technique for coronoid fracture fixation.

Preliminary report on lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction or repair for treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability of elbow

To explore the preliminary results of lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction or repair for posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of elbow. Between December 2006 and September 2010, 9 consecutive patients (9 elbows) undergoing surgical reconstruction or repair of LUCL for the treatment of elbow PLRI were studied. Surgical reconstruction of LUCL was performed with a tendon graft in 6 elbows and reattachment of LUCL to humerus in 3. The mean patient age was 28 years (range: 17 - 48). All patients had a previous history of elbow injury. Among them, 6 had a history of elbow dislocation. The average duration of symptoms was 10.7 months (range: 5 days - 30 months). The outcomes were graded with respects to objective and subjective stability, pain and range of motion as defined by Nestor. All patients were followed up. The mean follow-up period was 20 months (range: 4 - 49). Postoperatively, no patient had residual instability or a positive pivot shift test in elbow. Their outcomes were graded as excellent (n = 6), good (n = 2) and fair (n = 1). Subjective assessment revealed that all were satisfied with their surgical outcomes. An accurate recognition of PLRI of elbow is important for its appropriate management. Tendon graft is recommended for the reconstruction of LUCL. Surgical ligament reconstruction or repair is the preferred treatment option for restoring normal functions and elbow stability. Further studies are warranted because of a limited number of patients in the present study.