Lateral Root Repair Research Articles

Poster 344: The New "Terrible Triad": Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Concurrent Meniscal Lateral Root and Medial Ramp Repairs

Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to compare patient reported outcomes (PROMs) between isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR) and ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs and compare PROMs between different medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repair techniques. Methods: All patients with isolated (ISO) ACL reconstruction or ACL reconstruction with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs with a minimum 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. A final total of 42 ISO-ACL patients were matched based upon age, sex, and body mass index to 40 in the “terrible triad” (TT) cohorts. Outcome measures were obtained from 32 patients in the ISO cohort, and 38 patients in the TT cohort. The PROMs used for this study include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee, Cincinnati, Tegner, Lysholm, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) questionnaire forms. T tests and chi-square goodness of fit tests were used to compare the above PROMs both pre- and postoperatively within each cohort, and between cohorts and rates of revision or reoperation. Results: The preoperative and postoperative PROMs between patients in the isolated cohort and the triad cohort demonstrated no significant differences, except for the Physical category of the VR-12, in which the triad cohort had significantly higher results (p = 0.04) (Figure 1). Both the isolated cohort and the triad cohort reported significant differences between pre- and postoperative PROMs within their own cohorts. When comparing methods of surgery, including all-inside vs. inside-out for the medial meniscus repairs and tunnel versus no-tunnel for the lateral meniscus root repairs, no significant differences were found between postoperative PROMs. Additionally, no significant difference was found in revision or reoperative rates between the triad and isolated cohorts (p = 0.374) (Figure 2), the all-inside versus inside-out medial meniscus cohorts (p = 0.267), or the tunnel vs. no-tunnel lateral meniscus cohorts (p = 0.781). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in PROMs between isolated ACLR versus ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs. While the complexity of the TT ACLR patients was more involved, PROMs and healing rates were similar and performing concurrent medial ramp and lateral root repairs at the time of ACLR should be considered.

Arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tears

Anatomic repair of the torn meniscal root using transosseous sutures through the proximal tibia. Nontraumatic meniscal root tears without severe degenerative changes (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤ 2), good quality meniscal tissue, traumatic root tears with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament tears or multiligament injuries. Uncorrected varus or valgus malalignment (>3°), osteoarthritis Kellgren-Lawrence grades III and IV, and diffuse articular cartilage changes International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grades III and IV of the effected compartment, noncompliance. Root tear confirmed by probing; location for the planned root refixation on the tibial plateau is identified. Atibial socket or full transtibial tunnel created with an aiming drill guide. Using aself-retrieving suture passing device or acurved suture passer, the torn meniscus root sutured with no.0 non-absorbable braided suture. Meniscal sutures passed through the tibial tunnel and the meniscus root reduced into the socket or tunnel by tensioning the free ends of the sutures, followed by fixation on the tibial cortex. Toe touch weight-bearing for 6weeks, restricted range of motion (0-60° of flexion) for 6weeks, no axial loading at flexion angles >90° until 6months postoperatively. For medial root tears, pullout repair significantly improves functional outcome scores and seems to prevent the progression of osteoarthritis in theshort-term. Complete healing observed in only 60% of patients. Negative prognostic factors: varus malalignment > 5°, cartilage degeneration Outerbridge grade III and IV, and older age. Outcomes after lateral root repair are encouraging with apparent prevention of progression of osteoarthritis.

Posterior root tear of the medial and lateral meniscus

An avulsion of the tibial insertion of the meniscus or a radial tear close to the meniscal insertion is defined as a root tear. In clinical practice, the incidence of these lesions is often underestimated. However, several biomechanical studies have shown that the effect of a root tear is comparable to a total meniscectomy. Clinical studies documented progredient arthritic changes following root tears, thereby supporting basic science studies. The clinical diagnosis is limited by unspecific symptoms. In addition to the diagnostic arthroscopy, MRI is considered to be the gold standard of diagnosis of a meniscal root tear. Three different direct MRI signs for the diagnosis of a meniscus root tear have been described: Radial linear defect in the axial plane, vertical linear defect (truncation sign) in the coronal plane, and the so-called ghost meniscus sign in the sagittal plane. Meniscal extrusion is also considered to be an indirect sign of a root tear, but is less common in lateral root tears. During arthroscopy, the function of the meniscus root must be assessed by probing. However, visualization of the meniscal insertions is challenging. Refixation of the meniscal root can be performed using a transtibial pull-out suture, suture anchors, or side-to-side repair. Several short-term studies reported good clinical results after medial or lateral root repair. Nevertheless, MRI and second-look arthroscopy revealed high rates of incomplete or absent healing, especially for medial root tears. To date, most studies are case series with short-term follow-up and level IV evidence. Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 chondral lesions and varus malalignment of >5° were found to predict an inferior clinical outcome after medial meniscus root repair. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term results and to define evident criteria for meniscal root repair.