Involvement Of Lateral Resection Margin Research Articles

Risk-Scoring System for Prediction of Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Requiring Additional Gastrectomy in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer

PurposeWhen patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) undergo non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection requiring gastrectomy (NC-ESD-RG), additional medical resources and expenses are required for surgery. To reduce this burden, predictive model for NC-ESD-RG is required.Materials and MethodsData from 2,997 patients undergoing ESD for 3,127 forceps biopsy-proven differentiated-type EGCs (2,345 and 782 in training and validation sets, respectively) were reviewed. Using the training set, the logistic stepwise regression analysis determined the independent predictors of NC-ESD-RG (NC-ESD other than cases with lateral resection margin involvement or piecemeal resection as the only non-curative factor). Using these predictors, a risk-scoring system for predicting NC-ESD-RG was developed. Performance of the predictive model was examined internally with the validation set.ResultsRate of NC-ESD-RG was 17.3%. Independent pre-ESD predictors for NC-ESD-RG included moderately differentiated or papillary EGC, large tumor size, proximal tumor location, lesion at greater curvature, elevated or depressed morphology, and presence of ulcers. A risk-score was assigned to each predictor of NC-ESD-RG. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting NC-ESD-RG was 0.672 in both training and validation sets. A risk-score of 5 points was the optimal cut-off value for predicting NC-ESD-RG, and the overall accuracy was 72.7%. As the total risk score increased, the predicted risk for NC-ESD-RG increased from 3.8% to 72.6%.ConclusionsWe developed and validated a risk-scoring system for predicting NC-ESD-RG based on pre-ESD variables. Our risk-scoring system can facilitate informed consent and decision-making for preoperative treatment selection between ESD and surgery in patients with EGC.

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma with anastomosing glands of the stomach.

Gastric intestinal-type adenocarcinoma with anastomosing glands (IAAG) is characterized by architectural abnormality with frequent anastomosing glands and low-grade cytologic atypia. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for IAAG remain unclear. This study included 2828 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancers (EGCs) (78 IAAGs [2.6%] and 2893 well-differentiated [WD] or moderately differentiated [MD] EGCs [97.4%]). Clinicopathologic features and short-term and long-term outcomes of ESD for IAAG were reviewed and compared with those for WD or MD EGCs. Gastric IAAGs were larger and more likely to be confined to the lamina propria than WD or MD EGCs. Histological heterogeneity, flat or depressed lesion and lateral resection margin (LRM) involvement were observed with significantly higher frequencies in IAAGs than in WD or MD EGCs. En bloc with R0 resection and curative resection rates of IAAGs were 79.5% and 73.1%, respectively, and both were significantly lower than those of WD or MD EGCs (93.8% and 82.9%). LRM involvement accounted for 57.1% of the non-curative resection cases in gastric IAAGs. Half of IAAGs with LRM involvement had a crawling pattern at tumor periphery. Among patients undergoing curative ESD for IAAG, no recurrences occurred during a median 52months of follow-up. No lymph node metastasis was found in any of IAAG patients undergoing additional surgery after ESD. Gastric IAAGs have distinct clinicopathologic features from WD or MD EGCs. Given the favorable long-term outcomes after curative resection, ESD can be indicated for early gastric IAAGs.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for papillary adenocarcinoma of the stomach: low curative resection rate but favorable long-term outcomes after curative resection

The previous studies demonstrated aggressive clinicopathologic features of papillary early gastric cancer (EGC). This raised concerns about the appropriateness of current Japanese guidelines that recommend the same endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) criteria for papillary EGC as for well-differentiated (WD) or moderately differentiated (MD) EGCs. This study included 4140 patients who underwent ESD for differentiated-type EGC (87 papillary EGCs and 4259 WD or MD EGCs). The clinicopathologic characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of ESD for papillary EGC were reviewed and compared with those for WD or MD EGC. Papillary EGCs were larger, and had higher lymphovascular and submucosal invasion rates than WD or MD EGCs. Lateral resection margin involvement and histological heterogeneity were found more frequently in papillary EGC than in WD or MD EGC. En bloc with R0 resection and curative resection rates of papillary EGC were 85.1 and 49.4%, respectively, and both were significantly lower than those of WD or MD EGC (93.0 and 82.2%). In mucosal cancers, curative resection rates of papillary EGC and WD or MD EGC were 72.5 and 93.7%, respectively. Among patients undergoing curative ESD for papillary EGC, no extra-gastric recurrences occurred during median 58months of follow-up. Metachronous recurrence occurred in 5.2% of cases. Given the favorable long-term outcomes after curative resection, ESD might be indicated for papillary EGC according to the current Japanese guidelines. As papillary EGC has considerable lymphovascular and submucosal invasion rates, careful histological examination is required to accurately determine whether curative ESD is achieved.

A scoring system for patients with a tumor-positive lateral resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for residual/recurrent tumors in patients with a tumor-positive lateral resection margin (LRM+) after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC) and to establish the criteria for performing additional treatment. A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of EGC. Clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors for residual/recurrent tumor in LRM+ patients were analyzed. Eighty-two patients (84 lesions) with LRM+ after EMR (n=45) or ESD (n=39) were enrolled. Forty patients underwent additional gastrectomy or ESD, and 44 were closely observed. The residual/recurrent tumor rate was 34.5% (29 of 84 lesions). Univariate analysis found that the residual/recurrent tumor was associated with the endoscopic resection type (EMR), undifferentiated histology, number of involved directions, rate of lateral resection margin involvement and the total length (mm) of the lateral resection margin involved by the tumor. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, undifferentiated histology and rate (%) were independent risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 5.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-24.72, p=0.035 and OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, p=0.004, respectively). Clinicopathological factors that were identified from the univariate and multivariate analyses were scored in order to predict residual/recurrent tumors. We suggest a scoring system for additional treatment in patients with LRM+ after endoscopic resection of EGC based on the development of residual/recurrent tumors. This scoring system enables a more detailed selection of cases and may be useful in determining further treatment.

Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

In cases with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC), not all patients are found to have residual or recurrent tumor. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with residual/recurrent tumor in patients with incomplete endoscopic resection of EGC. A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection of EGC at a single institution in South Korea. Patients with a tumor-positive resection margin in the specimen were divided into two groups, with and without residual/recurrent tumor, and the clinicopathologic characteristics were compared. A total of 102 patients with a tumor-positive lateral or vertical resection margin after endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 10) or submucosal dissection (n = 92) were enrolled. Overall, the rate of residual/recurrent tumor was 33.3 % (34/102): 17 residual tumors in 46 patients who immediately underwent additional endoscopic or surgical resection, and 17 recurrent tumors in 56 patients who were initially followed up with regular endoscopy during a median period of 17 (range = 2-70) months. Univariate analysis showed that the presence of ulcer, the direction of the tumor-positive resection margin, and length of lateral resection margin involvement by the tumor were associated with the incidence of residual/recurrent tumor. In multivariate analysis, total length (cm) of lateral resection margin involvement was the only independent risk factor for residual/recurrent tumor (OR 2.05; 95 % CI 1.22-3.44, p = 0.006). Patients with extensive tumor involvement of a lateral resection margin after endoscopic resection of EGC should consider additional endoscopic or surgical resection due to a high risk of residual/recurrent tumor.

311 Quality of surgery

Local recurrence is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following apparently curative resection for colorectal cancer. The overall local recurrence rate is approximately 20%; there is however considerable variation amongst individual surgeons. After correction for stage of the disease at the time of the presentation these differences persist. Pathological studies have shown that the presence of lateral resection margin involvement is associated with the subsequent development of local recurrence. It is therefore tempting to believe that surgeons with a high turn over may achieve better results. Analysis of over 4,000 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery suggests that this is not necessarily. Further studies are required to identify those factors which contribute to high local recurrence rates and are amenable to treatment. Local recurrence is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following apparently curative resection for colorectal cancer. The overall local recurrence rate is approximately 20%; there is however considerable variation amongst individual surgeons. After correction for stage of the disease at the time of the presentation these differences persist. Pathological studies have shown that the presence of lateral resection margin involvement is associated with the subsequent development of local recurrence. It is therefore tempting to believe that surgeons with a high turn over may achieve better results. Analysis of over 4,000 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery suggests that this is not necessarily. Further studies are required to identify those factors which contribute to high local recurrence rates and are amenable to treatment.

Surgical lateral clearance in resected rectal carcinomas.A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic features

Incomplete removal of the tumor is the main cause of local recurrence in rectal carcinomas; this often occurs at the lateral aspects devoid of the peritoneum. The authors examined prospectively 80 resected rectal carcinoma specimens in an attempt to discover a reliable method to detect lateral resection margin (LRM) involvement by these tumors and to identify pathologic factors that would be prognostically important. In each of the 80 resected specimens, the whole tumor was embedded, and whole-mount sections of the entire tumor and the surrounding mesorectum were examined after serial transverse slicing. The distance from the outermost part of the tumor to the LRM (surgical clearance) was measured. Six (7.5%) of the 80 specimens showed LRM involvement (defined as surgical clearance < or = 1 mm) in the single slice seen macroscopically to have the deepest tumor invasion, whereas 16 specimens (20%) were found to have LRM involved after examining all slices microscopically. Surgically clearance had a strong inverse relationship with Dukes staging (P < 0.001) and depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.001). The overall local recurrence rate was 28%; it was much higher (53%) in the patients who had LRM involved by tumor. As a whole, local recurrence was related significantly to LRM involvement (P = 0.006). Survival rates were correlated with macroscopic (n = 3) and microscopic (n = 13) features of the resected specimens using Cox multivariate regression analysis. Three of the nine pathologic parameters isolated (i.e., surgical clearance, cellular differentiation, and number of involved pericolic lymph nodes) were identified as favorable independent prognostic factors. Local recurrence is related closely to LRM involvement. Embedding and examining the entire tumor and mesorectum is the only reliable and satisfactory means of assessing LRM. Detailed pathologic study on the resected tumor is important when assessing the prognosis.

Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer

The extent of tumour growth beyond the muscularis propria (mesorectal spread) was measured in specimens from 167 consecutive patients with rectal cancer. The 5-year survival was significantly greater in patients with slight mesorectal spread (4 mm or less) than in those with more extensive mesorectal spread (55% [95% confidence interval 42-66%] vs 25% [13-38%]). The prognostic value for survival of mesorectal spread was independent of the presence of lymphnode metastases. There were also significant differences in survival between patients with slight and extensive mesorectal spread among patients with Dukes' stage B tumours (66% [41-82%] vs 37% [14-60%]) and those with Dukes' stage C tumours (30% [12-52%] vs 18% [6-34%]). Thus mesorectal spread of rectal cancer is an important determinant of survival, and its accurate measurement may serve to subdivide Dukes' B and C cases. In this study tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin was not a useful predictor of local recurrence, but it did correlate with poor prognosis.