Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research Articles

Midterm Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Revision Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

It is unknown whether the outcomes achieved in the early period after revision lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (RLMAT) are maintained through the midterm period. To evaluate the midterm clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent RLMAT. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We reviewed the outcomes of 19 RLMATs in 18 patients with at least 5 years of follow-up data. The mean follow-up period was 6 ± 1.1 years (range, 5-8.5 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and the Tegner activity level. Radiographic progression of arthritis was measured by the absolute and relative joint space widths on 45° of knee flexion posteroanterior radiographs preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up.Failure was defined as meniscocapsular separation, removal, or tear of more than half of the meniscal allograft on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Of the 18 patients, 3 underwent ≥2 RLMATs. The survival rate was evaluated according to the number of revision surgeries. For knees with an intact meniscus transplant at the final follow-up, the modified Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly improved compared with preoperatively, but the Tegner activity level was unchanged. No significant differences were found in the absolute and relative joint space widths postoperatively. There were 6 failures within 3 years after RLMAT; the overall 5-year survival rate was 68.4% (13/19 knees). All failed knees showed bucket-handle tear patterns on MRI due to meniscocapsular healing failure. The survival rate decreased as the number of RLMATs increased-73.3% for a first RLMAT (n = 15 knees), 66.7% for a second RLMAT (n = 3 knees), and 0% for a third RLMAT (n = 1 knee). Midterm MRIs of 8 well-healed RLMATs showed evidence of meniscal degeneration; nonetheless, this did not affect clinical outcomes. The midterm results of RLMATs demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 68.4% and positive clinical and radiological outcomes for failed MATs despite unimproved activity levels. Inadequate meniscocapsular healing was the leading cause of failure, and it needs to be carefully considered when performing RLMATs.

Early Graft Tear As a Major Risk Factor for the Clinical Failure of Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

Background: Graft tears are often observed on magnetic resonance imaging after lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Their characteristics, such as the location and configuration, are likely to be different depending on the timing of the injury. However, the clinical relevance of early and late graft tears has not been investigated. Hypothesis: (1) Both early and late graft tears would be associated with the clinical failure of lateral MAT, and (2) an early graft tear (ET) would lead to worse outcomes than a late graft tear (LT) or an intact graft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 261 patients who had undergone lateral MAT between March 2000 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The graft tear was investigated using magnetic resonance imaging, which was performed routinely during the first postoperative year and every 2 years thereafter. The patients were classified according to the timing of the graft tear: no graft tear (NT) group, ET (≤1 year after surgery) group, and LT (>1 year after surgery) group. Clinical failure was defined as (1) reoperations including arthroplasty, realignment osteotomy, revision MAT, and meniscectomy (>50% of the graft or to the zone of the meniscocapsular junction) or (2) a Lysholm score of <65. Risk factors for a low survival rate were investigated using Cox regression analysis. A comparison of the Lysholm scores for each group was also performed. Results: There were 24 (9.2%) patients who had clinical failure at a mean follow-up of 7.5 ± 4.3 years. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 92.8% (95% CI, 91.1%-94.5%). A graft tear was noted in 80 patients: 23 patients in the ET group and 57 patients in the LT group. The most common tear pattern was a meniscocapsular tear in the ET group and a complex tear in the LT group. The hazard ratios for clinical failure in the ET and LT groups were 30.7 (95% CI, 9.4-76.4; P < .001) and 4.0 (95% CI, 1.3-12.9; P = .013), respectively. The Lysholm score of the ET group (82.7 ± 14.8) was significantly lower than that of the other 2 groups (NT: 87.6 ± 11.7; LT: 90.7 ± 9.0; P = .024). Conclusion: An ET was a major risk factor for the clinical failure of lateral MAT. An LT was associated with a lower survival rate. An ET was also associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Single-incision bone bridge lateral meniscus allograft transplantation: preserving neurovascular safety with promising results for posterior horn distortion and graft maturation.

This study aimed to investigate the graft maturation and safety of single-incision bone bridge lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (LMAT). This study involved 35 patients who underwent LMAT between 2019 and 2020. All patients completed at least 2years of follow-up (median 34months; range 24-43) and underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the trajectory safety of the leading suture passer and all-inside suture instrument (Fast-Fix). Graft status was evaluated according to the Stoller classification. Based on preoperative MRI measurements, the expected trajectory of the leading suture passer did not transect the common peroneal nerve (CPN), with the closest distance between the expected trajectory and CPN being 1.4mm and the average distance being 6.8 ± 3.2mm. The average distance from the lateral meniscal posterior horn (LMPH) to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (PNVB) was 7.4 ± 2.6mm and the nearest was 4.8mm. The expected trajectory of the all-inside suturing instrument did not transect the PNVB when the distance was at least 12mm, from the most lateral margin of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Grade 3 signal intensity in the posterior third of the allograft on MRI was observed in 6 of 35 (17.1%) patients. Amongst the grade 3 signal intensities in the posterior one-third of the allografts, 3 of the 35 (8.5%) LMATs had a distorted contour. The single-incision bone bridge LMAT technique introduced in this study is a convenient approach that preserves neurovascular safety and provides good results for the distortion of the posterior horn of the allograft and graft maturation. The safety zone for the penetrating devices during the procedure extended from 12mm laterally to the most lateral margin of the PCL to the medial margin of the popliteal hiatus. IV.

Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Shows a Long-Term Chondroprotective Effect on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2 Mapping at 7-Year Minimum Follow-Up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the long-term chondroprotective effect of lateral MAT (meniscal allograft transplantation) using quantitative MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) T2 mapping. MethodsIn patients who underwent isolated lateral MAT, quantitative MRI T2 mapping was conducted preoperatively and postoperatively with at minimum follow-up of 7 years to assess the articular cartilage status. On the sagittal section image bisecting the lateral femoral condyle, the weight-bearing portions of the femoral and tibial articular cartilage were divided into three segments each—six segments in total—based on the meniscal coverage area. The regions of interest analysis were performed on the six segments to measure the mean T2 value. Then, the whole layer was divided into deep and superficial layers for further zonal analysis. The longitudinal change in T2 values was statistically analyzed using paired t-tests. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Lysholm score. ResultsA total of 31 patients were included in the study, with the MRI follow-up period of a minimum follow-up of 7 years (mean 8.9±1.3 years; range, 7.0–11.2 years). The mean T2 value of the whole layer showed significant improvement in all segments of the femoral cartilage and the posterior segment of tibial cartilage. In the zonal analysis, the mean T2 value of the tibial cartilage showed significant improvement in the superficial layer of the mid to posterior portion, while the deep layer remained stable. In contrast, the mean T2 value of the femoral cartilage showed significant improvement in the superficial and deep layers in all segments. The mean Lysholm score significantly improved from 62.6±12.8 to 90.9±10.5 (P < .001). ConclusionThis study suggests that MAT appears to have a long-term chondroprotective effect on the articular cartilage as judged by quantitative T2 mapping. Level of EvidenceLevel Ⅳ, Case series.

Isolated meniscus allograft transplantation with soft-tissue technique effectively reduces knee laxity in the presence of previous meniscectomy: In-vivo navigation of 18 consecutive cases

ObjectivesAlthough meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is a well-established procedure with satisfactory clinical results, limited in vivo kinematic information exists on the effect of medial and lateral MAT performed in the clinical setting. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of arthroscopic isolated medial and lateral MAT with a soft-tissue fixation on pre- and post-operative knee laxity using a surgical navigation system. Methods18 consecutive patients undergoing MAT (8 medial, 10 lateral) were enrolled. A surgical navigation system was used to quantify the anterior-posterior displacement at 30 and 90 degrees of knee flexion (AP30 and AP90), the varus-valgus rotation at 0 and 30 degrees of knee flexion (VV0 and VV30) and the dynamic laxity on the pivot-shift test (PS), which was determined through the anterior displacement of the lateral tibial compartment (APlat) and posterior acceleration of the lateral tibial compartment during tibial reduction (ACC). Data from laxity before and after MAT were compared through paired t-test (p ​< ​0.05). ResultsAfter medial MAT, there was a significant decrease in tibial translation of 3.1 ​mm (31%; p ​= ​0.001) for AP30 and 2.3 ​mm (27%; p ​= ​0.020) for AP90, a significant difference of 2.5° (50%; p ​= ​0.002) for VV0 and 1.7° (27%; p ​= ​0.012) for VV30. However, medial MAT did not determine any reduction in the PS kinematic data. Lateral MAT determined a significant decrease in the tibial translation of 2.5 ​mm (38%; p ​< ​0.001) for AP30 and 1.9 ​mm (34%; p ​= ​0.004) for AP90 as well as a significant difference of 3.4° (59%; p ​< ​0.001) for VV0 and of 1.7° (23%; p ​= ​0.011) for VV30. There was also a significant reduction of the PS of 4.4 ​mm (22%; p ​= ​0.028) for APlat and 384.8 ​mm/s2 (51%; p ​= ​0.005) for ACC. ConclusionMAT with soft-tissue fixation results in a significant laxity reduction in an in-vivo setting. Medial MAT improved knee kinematics by determining a significant reduction with particular emphasis on AP translation and VV manoeuvre. Conversely, Lateral MAT determined a massive reduction of the PS and a mild decrease of the AP translation and VV manoeuvre. Study designControlled laboratory study.

Osteotomy of the Femoral Lateral Collateral Ligament Insertion for a Tight Lateral Compartment in Complex Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

Background: In cases of complex arthroscopic knee surgery in the lateral compartment, such as performing lateral meniscus repair or transplantation, a tight lateral compartment can jeopardize the best possible care and could lead to iatrogenic cartilage injury. This technique shows a way to increase arthroscopic working space in a tight lateral compartment by performing an osteotomy of the femoral insertion of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), utilizing a novel adjustable loop refixation technique. Indication: The femoral LCL insertion osteotomy can be performed if increased visualization and working space of the lateral compartment are needed during the complex arthroscopic knee surgery. Technique Description: After identification of the LCL femoral insertion, a 2-mm drill is passed through the LCL insertion to prepare for an anatomic reduction. The osteotomy is performed by taking a small bone plug together with the complete LCL insertion. Increased visualization and working space in the lateral compartment are obtained without damaging the intrinsic LCL structure. For reinsertion, the bone plug and proximal LCL is whipstitched with a high-strength suture and fixated to an adjustable loop Ultrabutton. The adjustable loop is shuttled through a predrilled 4.5-mm femoral tunnel and flipped on the medial side. The adjustable button is tensioned in 30° of flexion until the bone plug is anatomically reduced. Results: We present 1 patient who underwent a femoral LCL osteotomy during arthroscopic lateral meniscus allograft transplantation. The osteotomy healed without any issues, and there was no residual LCL laxity; which was confirmed with varus stress radiographs. Discussion/Conclusion: A femoral LCL insertion osteotomy can release a tight lateral compartment without damaging the intrinsic LCL structure. The adjustable loop fixation avoids the use of more traditional screw and washer fixation techniques, which tend to be more prominent and have the potential to back out. An osteotomy is more invasive than the “pie-crusting” technique of the medial collateral ligament for a tight medial compartment. However, it is required due to the poor intrinsic healing capacity of the LCL. Care should be taken to anatomically reduce the bone plug to avoid iatrogenic creation of LCL laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Tear patterns and locations are different between lateral and medial compartments in patients with early anatomical failure after meniscal allograft transplantation.

To investigate the characteristics of anatomically failed grafts within 1year after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and compare the differences between lateral and medial MATs. The records of consecutive patients with anatomically failed grafts within 1year after primary MAT between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed. Anatomical failure was defined as a tear covering > 50% of the allograft or an unstable peripheral rim. The pattern and location of the graft tears were analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopy. A total of 21 patients were included. All 21 patients had anatomical failure with tears involving > 50% of the allograft, whereas 15 had an unstable peripheral rim of the allograft. The mean failure time was 6.6 ± 3.6months in all patients (lateral MAT, n = 15; medial MAT, n = 6). In the lateral MAT group, meniscocapsular separation was the most common pattern (n = 10, 66.7%), followed by complex (n = 3, 20.0%), radial (n = 1, 6.7%), and longitudinal (n = 1, 6.7%) tear. In the medial MAT group, a root tear was the most common pattern (n = 5, 83.3%), followed by a complex tear (n = 1, 16.7%). Meanwhile, in the lateral MAT, the midbody was the most frequently affected location (n = 9, 60.0%), followed by the posterior (n = 5, 33.3%) and anterior (n = 1, 6.7%) areas; in the medial MAT group, the posterior (n = 5, 83.3%) was the most frequently affected location, followed by the anterior area (n = 1, 16.7%). Significant differences in the pattern (P = 0.002) and location (P = 0.043) of the graft tears were found between lateral and medial MATs. In patients with early failure after MAT, meniscocapsular separation in the midbody of the lateral compartment and root tears in the posterior area of the medial compartment were the most common. Thus, surgeons are encouraged to pay extra attention to these vulnerable areas during the early period after MAT. IV.

Revision and Conversion to Arthroplasty Are Low Among Adolescents Undergoing Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Using the Bridge-In-Slot Technique at Midterm Follow-Up

To report midterm outcomes after primary medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) withfresh-frozen allografts implanted with the bridge-in-slot technique in the adolescent patient population. Adolescent patients less than 18 years old at the time of primary MAT from 1999 to 2016 were retrospectively identified. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Lysholm, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales scores were collected before surgery and at 1-year, 2-year, and a minimum 5-year follow-up. Thresholds for achieving clinically significant outcomes were calculated, and the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was determined. Meniscus reoperation (partial, subtotal, or total meniscectomy, repair, or failure) and failure (revision MAT or conversion to arthroplasty) rates were determined. Forty-four (female n= 33; male n= 11) of 62 identified patients met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 9.5 ± 3.8 years (range, 5.0-17.7). Lateral MAT was performed in most patients (n= 35/44 [80%]). Isolated MAT was performed in 27 (61%) patients. Common concomitant procedures included osteochondral allograft transplantation (32%), autologous chondrocyte implantation (18%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (14%). MCID, PASS, and SCB were achieved by patients at a minimum 5-year follow-up for IKDC (62%; 76%; 31%), Lysholm (62%; 79%; 23%), and KOOS questionnaires (Pain [65%; 81%; 41%], Symptoms [58%; 81%; 47%], Activities of Daily Living [53%; 77%; 35%], Sport [86%; 75%; 50%], and Quality of Life [59%; 81%; 59%]), respectively. Fourteen patients (32%) underwent reoperation at an average of 5.0±4.3 years (range, 0.8-14.0) after MAT. Three (7%) patients met criteria for failure, requiring revision MAT an average of 3.8 ± 1.1 years (range, 2.8-4.9) after transplantation. No patients underwent arthroplasty. Overall survival free from failure at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 100%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. At the time of final follow-up, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with their current physical status. Primary MAT in adolescent patients resulted in significant and durable functional improvements at mid- to long-term follow-up. At an average of 9.5 years after surgery, meniscal reoperation rate was 32% whereas graft survival free of revision MAT was 93%. Adolescents undergoing MAT demonstrated similar functional outcomes and graft survivability when compared to available adult MAT literature. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Poster 341: Clinical Outcomes of Concomitant Arthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

Objectives: Single-stage meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a technically challenging procedure for management of knee pain and instability in younger patients. However, there is limited data on specific outcomes of this procedure, such as return to work and functional status relative to the U.S. population at large. The purpose of this study was to assess surgical and patient-reported outcomes following concomitant ACLR and MAT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent concomitant ACLR and MAT at our institution from 2010 to 2021. We included patients who underwent either concomitant primary or revision ACLR and medial or lateral MAT with a minimum follow-up of 8 months. Complications, graft failures, and reoperations were abstracted from patient records and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, satisfaction, Lysholm Knee Scale, return to sport, and return to work outcomes were assessed using an email survey. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Physical Function Scores were used to measure patients’ functional status relative to the U.S. population. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The cohort consisted of 18 knees of 17 individual patients (16 unilateral, 1 bilateral). The cohort were majority male (15 patients; 83%) with mean age of 31.6 years (range 19-49) and mean BMI of 27.6 (range 22.2-53.3). Mean follow-up time was 47.3 months (range 8-101). A majority underwent revision ACLR (12 patients; 67%) with medial MAT (18 patients; 92%). Reoperation rate was high (5 patients; 28%) but only one patient experienced recurrence of painrequiring TKA. Patient-reported outcomes (n = 14) were generally positive with low VAS pain (mean 2.2), high satisfaction (mean 77.9%), and fair Lysholm score (mean 81.1) though satisfaction was lower among revision ACLR patients versus primary ACLR patients (mean 67% vs 100%; p = 0.04). Return to work rate was high (13 patients; 93%) while return to sport rate was low (6 patients; 43%). Postoperative PROMIS scores were comparable or superior to the national average and correlated significantly with patient satisfaction (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: The concomitant ACLR and MAT procedure is associated with excellent knee pain and functional outcomes, low rates of complications and meniscus graft failure, and high rate of return to work after surgery. However, rate of return to sport is low and satisfaction is worse among revision ACLR patients. Overall, the single-stage ACLR and MAT procedure appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients with concomitant ACL and meniscus deficiency.

Effects of Lateral Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy on Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Background: Lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment increases the rate of lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT) with a concomitant varus-producing opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is an option yet to be evaluated biomechanically. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to clarify the biomechanical effects of the realignment procedure in the setting of LMAT. We hypothesized that (1) given the dependence of the lateral compartment on the lateral meniscus, a DFO and increasing degrees of varus would be insufficient to restore lateral compartment pressures to normal from a lateral meniscus-deficient state, and that (2) LMAT would restore lateral compartment pressures to the intact state while DFO would decrease lateral compartment pressures for any given state of the meniscus. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees underwent opening-wedge varus-producing DFO secured by an external fixator. Anatomic alignment was standardized to 6° of mechanical valgus, and each joint was tested in full extension. Submeniscal placement of thin film pressure sensors allowed for the recording of contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and contact area. The specimens were loaded on a biaxial dynamic testing machine with loading angles between 9° valgus and 6° varus of mechanical alignment. Conditions tested included intact meniscus, meniscal deficiency, and meniscal transplantation. Results: Isolated varus-producing DFO to 6° in the meniscus-deficient state failed to restore joint pressures and contact areas to the intact state, with significant changes in mean contact pressure (175%), mean peak contact pressure (135%), and contact area (–41%) (all P &lt; .05 vs intact), while LMAT restored all outcome measures (all P &gt; .05 compared with intact). After LMAT, every additional 1° of DFO correction contributed to a decrease in the mean contact pressure, peak pressure, and contact area of 5.6% (–0.0479 N/mm2), 5.9% (–0.154 N/mm2), and 1.4% (–6.99 mm2) for the lateral compartment and 7.3% (+0.034 N/mm2), 12.6% (+0.160 N/mm2), and 4.3% (+20.53 mm2) for the medial compartment, respectively. Conclusion: Isolated DFO was inadequate to restore load distribution in meniscus-deficient knees, while concomitant LMAT restored near normal forces and improved the lateral compartment biomechanical profile. Clinical Relevance Our findings support the concomitant use of LMAT and varus-producing DFO in the setting of lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment. This study provides tools for the orthopaedic surgeon to individualize the correction for each patient.

Survivorship After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Plus Concurrent Cartilage Procedure in Patients With Poor Cartilage Status: A Comparative Study

Background: The effect of a concurrent cartilage procedure in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) in patients with bipolar cartilage lesions (high-grade lesions on both the femoral and the tibial side) is not well studied. An objective evaluation of graft status after MAT and a concurrent cartilage procedure has not been reported. Purpose: To investigate the effect of concurrent cartilage procedures and lateral MAT on objective and clinical outcomes, including survival, in patients with bipolar cartilage lesions. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 149 patients with high-grade (International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society grade 3 or 4) cartilage lesions were enrolled and assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on the cartilage procedure and cartilage status at the time of MAT. Femoral cartilage procedures (microfracture, n = 18; osteochondral autograft transfer, n = 13) and lateral MAT were performed in 31 patients with bipolar cartilage lesions (cartilage procedure group). Another 70 patients with bipolar lesions underwent only lateral MAT without cartilage procedure (bipolar lesion group). The remaining 48 patients, who had high-grade lesions only on the tibial side and underwent lateral MAT without a cartilage procedure, were selected as a control group (unipolar lesion group). Anatomic survival was objectively assessed by follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy. Clinical survivorship was determined with a Lysholm score <65 or need for additional surgery, such as revision MAT. Results: The mean Lysholm score improved from 67.2 ± 15.9 preoperatively to 86.7 ± 11.1 with a mean follow-up of 78.0 ± 51.2 months (P < .001). The postoperative scores were not significantly different between the 3 groups. The estimated 5-year anatomic survival rate in the cartilage procedure group (86.7%) was higher than that in the bipolar lesion group (65.0%; P = .043) but comparable with that in the unipolar lesion group (90.2%; P = .572). The estimated 5-year clinical survival rates were not significantly different between the groups (P = .187). Conclusion: A concurrent femoral cartilage procedure improved the anatomic survival rate in patients with bipolar chondral lesions who underwent lateral MAT. This finding suggests that the cartilage procedure is an effective treatment choice and may improve the status of an allograft after lateral MAT for patients with bipolar cartilage lesions.

Effect of High Body Mass Index on Survivorship After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Preoperative body mass index (BMI) is one of the correctable factors before surgery. Few studies have investigated the effect of BMI on the survivorship of lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Hypothesis: Patients with a high BMI have inferior survivorship after lateral MAT when compared with those with a normal BMI. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Overall, 306 consecutive patients who underwent lateral MAT were retrospectively reviewed. According to the classification criteria of the World Health Organization, patients were split into 2 groups: normal weight (BMI <25.0) and overweight (BMI ≥25.0). There were 104 patients (34.0%) allocated into the overweight group. Given the demographic heterogeneity between the groups, propensity score matching was performed. Before and after propensity score matching, the anatomic and clinical survival rates of the 2 groups were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Anatomic failure was defined as a tear covering >50% of the allograft or unstable peripheral rim on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy. Clinical failure was defined as a Lysholm score <65 or need for additional surgery, such as revision MAT. Results: For all patients, the mean ± SD follow-up period was 6.9 ± 4.2 years. The mean BMI of the overweight and normal weight groups was 27.8 ± 2.6 and 22.0 ± 1.9, respectively. The mean Lysholm scores at the last follow-up were not significantly different between the groups. However, the anatomic survival rate in the overweight group (77.9%) was significantly lower than that in the normal weight group (90.1%) (P < .001). The clinical survival rate (82.7%) in the overweight group was significantly lower than that in the normal weight group (95.0%) (P < .001). After propensity score matching for patient characteristics, which left 87 patients per group, the anatomic and clinical survival rates were significantly lower in the overweight group. Conclusion: Preoperative high BMI was associated with inferior anatomic and clinical survival rates. The results of the current study suggest that weight loss before lateral MAT may be required in overweight patients for the improvement of anatomic and clinical survival rates.

Bone bridge technique for lateral meniscal allograft transplantation: no difference in clinical outcome compared to the soft tissue technique.

There is considerable debate regarding the optimal method of fixation for lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), with bone bridge techniques technically harder but allowing maintenance of root attachments, while soft tissue techniques are potentially more challenging for healing. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of the bone bridge and soft tissue techniques for lateral MAT in terms of failure, re-operation rate, complications and patient reported outcomes. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for patients undergoing primary lateral MAT with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Patients following surgery utilising the bone bridge technique (BB) were compared with historical control patients who underwent MAT with the soft tissue technique (ST). Outcome was assessed by failure rate, defined as removal or revision of the meniscus transplant, survivorship by Kaplan-Meir analysis, re-operation rates, and other adverse event. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared using data at the 2-year point or 1year if not reached 2years. One-hundred and twelve patients following lateral meniscal transplants were included, 31 in the BB group and 81 in the ST historical control group, with no differences in demographics between both groups. Median follow-up for the BB group was 18 (12-43) months compared to 46 (15-62) months for the ST group. There were 3 failures (9.6%) in the BB group v 2 (2.4%) in the ST group (n.s.) with a mean time to failure of 9months in both groups. 9 patients (29%) required a re-operation (all cause) in the BB group v 24 patients (29.6%) in the ST group (n.s). There was no difference in complications between both groups. There was significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in all PROMs (Tegner, IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm) between baseline and 2-year follow-up for both groups but no between-group differences. Lateral MAT has a high success rate for symptomatic meniscal deficiency with significant benefits irrespective of the fixation technique. There is no advantage in performing the more technically demanding BB technique over ST fixation. Level 2.

Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Distal Femoral Osteotomy

Background: Meniscal allograft transplantation improves functional and patient-reported outcomes in patients with meniscal deficiency without significant osteoarthritis. In addition, it is known that valgus malalignment of the knee can lead to meniscal and chondral damage, and surgery is often indicated to restore the mechanical axis and slow progression of osteoarthritis. Indications: Indications for this procedure include patients with symptomatic lateral meniscal deficiency with associated valgus deformity of the knee. Patient’s age must be less than 50 years, body mass index less than 35 kg/m2, meniscal deficiency, and ipsilateral pain with or without swelling. Ligament tears, focal cartilage loss, and malalignment are not contraindications if also corrected. Technique Description: We begin by removing the remaining lateral meniscus, taking care to leave a small peripheral rim of meniscus. A transpatellar tendon arthrotomy is performed, and the meniscal allograft is passed through the arthrotomy and into the knee. An inside-out repair is performed using vertical mattress sutures. The sutures are tightened and tied with the knee at 30° to 40° of flexion. The distal femoral osteotomy is then performed. An approach is made to the lateral femur, where initial guidewires are placed using fluoroscopic guidance. The initial saw cut is made about 75% of the way across the femur, and an osteotome is used to complete the osteotomy. Care is taken to preserve the far medial cortex. An adjustable wedge osteotome is placed to open the lateral cortex in accordance with the preoperative template. The cortical wedge is fashioned using the tibial allograft from the meniscal transplant and is placed into the osteotomy. The osteotomy is secured using a locking plate with locking screws, and this is confirmed in safe position using fluoroscopy prior to the conclusion of the case. Results: Patients will have effective deformity correction and alleviation of pain. Many patients can return to sport without restrictions following appropriate rehabhilitation. Conclusion: Lateral meniscal allograft transplantation with distal femoral opening wedge osteotomy is an effective treatment for symptomatic lateral meniscal insufficiency with associated valgus deformity of the knee in patients without osteoarthritis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Graft Extrusion of 3 Millimeters Is Acceptable at a Minimum of 5-Year Outcomes for Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

To determine the acceptable amount of graft extrusion based on long-term radiographic outcomes in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). 94 lateral MAT patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up period were reviewed. Graft extrusion was measured on MRI scans taken 1 year after surgery, and the study population was divided according to the amount of extrusion: group A, extrusion <3 mm; group B, 3 mm ≤ extrusion <5 mm; and group C, extrusion ≥5 mm. For radiographic evaluation, the bilateral lateral joint space widths (JSWs) were measured on a standing 45° flexion posteroanterior radiograph. To standardize the measurements, the affected JSW was divided by the contralateral JSW. The change in the standardized JSW (ΔJSWstd) between the preoperative and latest follow-up assessments was analyzed according to the three groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed to control other related factors, such as lower limb alignment and cartilage status at the time of MAT. The acceptable amount of graft extrusion was calculated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the third quartile of ΔJSWstd. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm score and were compared among the groups. The mean follow-up duration was 8.3 ± 3.1 years. There were 54, 25, and 15 patients in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. In multiple regression analysis, both group B and group C had significant associations with ΔJSWstd and their beta coefficients were comparable (group B, P < .001, β= .642; group C, P < .001, β= 0.613). No significant difference in ΔJSWstd was found between group B and group C (P= .494). On the basis of the ROC curve, the acceptable amount of graft extrusion was 3.74 mm (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 77.8%). There were no differences in the Lysholm scores among the three groups (P= .329). ΔJSWstd differed between graft extrusion <3 mm (group A) and graft extrusion ≥3 mm (group B and group C). However, there was no significant difference in ΔJSWstd between group B and group C. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was found according to graft extrusion. This study gave supporting evidence for the currently recognized acceptable amount of graft extrusion (3 mm). Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Mid-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation with Suture-Only Fixation Plus Capsulodesis.

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is an effective reconstructive procedure for treating a symptomatic postmeniscectomy syndrome. It consists of replacing the lost meniscal tissue aiming to improve the clinical outcomes and prevent progressive deterioration of the joint. The aim of this study was to evaluate meniscal graft survivorship and report on the radiographic (in terms of graft extrusion and joint space width and alignment) and the functional results through a midterm follow-up of lateral MAT performed with a soft tissue fixation technique after capsulodesis. In total, 23 patients who underwent lateral MAT as a single procedure were included. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm, Tegner, and visual analog scale scales were used for patient assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging and a complete radiographic protocol were conducted to determine the degree of meniscal extrusion and the changes in the degree of osteoarthritis and coronal alignment. Assessments were performed after 2 and 7 years of follow-up. A significant improvement in all the scores, relative to preoperative values, was found after 7 years of follow-up. This improvement remained consistent throughout the first and second follow-up periods. A mean absolute extrusion of 2.2 mm ± 1.6 and an extrusion percentage of 28.0% ± 11.43 were found, with no significant differences throughout the follow-up periods. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the frontal mechanical axis and joint space narrowing between the preoperative value and at the first and second follow-up periods. A survival rate of 85.7% was found after 7 years of follow-up. Capsulodesis results in a low degree of meniscal extrusion in isolated lateral MAT fixed with a suture-only technique, which is maintained after 7 years of follow-up, with a high graft survival index (>85%) and satisfactory results on the functional scales.

Nonextruded Grafts Result in Better Cartilage Quality After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Quantitative 3-T MRI T2 Mapping

Background: Several studies have reported that graft extrusion after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is associated with deterioration of surgical outcomes. However, no study has investigated the effect of graft extrusion on the articular cartilage using objective quantitative methods. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to investigate the influence of graft extrusion on the chondroprotective effect of lateral MAT on knee articular cartilage. We hypothesized that MAT without graft extrusion would result in better cartilage quality than MAT with graft extrusion. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Altogether, 105 patients who underwent isolated lateral MAT were divided into the extrusion and nonextrusion groups based on postoperative 3-month magnetic resonance imaging. Quantitative T2 mapping was performed on pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at midterm follow-up (mean ± SD, 3.2 ± 0.7 years). The weightbearing area of the femoral and tibial plateau articular cartilage was divided into 6 segments (F1, F2, F3, TP1, TP2, and TP3) from the anterior to posterior direction according to the meniscal coverage area. Each segment was further segmented into superficial and deep layers for zonal analysis. Longitudinal change in cartilage T2 value was compared between the groups. Lysholm scores were used to evaluate clinical function. Results: The mean T2 value of the nonextrusion group showed a significant improvement in 14 of 18 segments after lateral MAT, whereas the extrusion group demonstrated no statistically significant change. The biochemical properties of cartilage tissue as judged by quantitative T2 mapping indicated improvement in the nonextrusion group as compared with the extrusion group in the F2, TP2, and TP3 segments overall; the deep layers of the F1, F2, and TP2 segments; and the superficial layer of the TP3 segment (P < .05). Conclusion: This study shows that the nonextruded graft results in better cartilage properties of the knee joint after lateral MAT as compared with the extruded graft at midterm follow-up.

Comparison of Radiologic Results after Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation with or without Capsulodesis Using an All-Soft Suture Anchor.

Background and Objectives: Studies analyzing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after simultaneously performing lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and capsulodesis are currently rare. This study aimed to compare the MRI results between the group that performed lateral MAT alone and the group that performed both lateral MAT and capsulodesis simultaneously. Materials and Methods: A total of 55 patients who underwent lateral MAT with a 1-year follow-up MRI were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure: group I (isolated lateral MAT, n = 26) and group C (combined lateral MAT and capsulodesis, n = 29). Differences between groups were compared regarding subjective knee scores, graft extrusion, graft signal, articular cartilage loss, and joint space width (JSW). Results: The subjective knee scores improved significantly in both groups (all, p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences in these scores between both groups at the 1-year follow-up. Group C showed less coronal graft extrusion at the 1-year follow-up (1.1 ± 1.7 mm vs. 2.4 ± 1.8 mm, p < 0.001). Pathologic coronal graft extrusion (≥3 mm) was found in seven (26.9%) patients in group I and three (10.3%) in group C. Concerning the graft signal, group C showed less grade 3 signal intensity in the posterior root of the graft. There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative cartilage status between groups. Regarding JSW, there were no significant differences in postoperative JSW between both groups. However, in group C, JSW significantly increased from 3.9 ± 0.4 mm to 4.5 ± 1.4 mm (p = 0.031). Conclusions: In lateral MAT, capsulodesis (open decortication and suture anchor fixation) could reduce graft extrusion without complications. In the future, large-volume and long-term prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm the clinical effects following capsulodesis.

Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Provides a Chondroprotective Effect on Articular Cartilage: Quantitative 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2 Mapping

This study aimed to assess the cartilage status in patients who underwent isolated lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) using preoperative and postoperative quantitative 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 mapping at midterm follow-up period. Patients who underwent lateral MAT without cartilage treatment procedures between 2010 and 2019 were assessed by quantitative MRI preoperatively and postoperatively. On the sagittal section image following the center of the lateral femoral condyle, the weightbearing area of the articular cartilage was divided into six segments based on the meniscal coverage area from anterior to posterior direction. The mean T2 values of each six segments were measured for three regions of interest: overall, deep, and superficial layers. The change in T2 values was statistically analyzed by paired t-tests. The Lysholm score was used to evaluate clinical function. A total of 105 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 3.2 years (range, 2.0-5.4 years). Among the six segments, the mean T2 value showed significant improvement in the overall layer of F2 (the middle weightbearing area of femoral condyle) and TP3 (the posterior weightbearing area of tibia condyle) segments (P = .013 and .021, respectively) and the superficial layer of the F3 (the posterior weightbearing area of femoral condyle) segments (P = .028). The mean T2 value of all the other segments did not show statistically significant change. The mean Lysholm score significantly improved from 66.5±15.8 to 89.3±10.0 (P <.001). Overall, 73.3% and 96.2% of the patients met MCID and PASS respectively. The mean T2 value of the articular cartilage of the weightbearing area was either maintained or showed statistically significant improvement depending on the location following isolated lateral MAT. Thus, the transplanted meniscus seems to have the chondroprotective effect on the weightbearing cartilage. Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Assessment of Anatomic Restoration and Clinical Outcomes Between Medial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

Background:Proper anatomic restoration is an important consideration for meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), even with the different anatomica characteristics between the medial meniscus and lateral meniscus.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of anatomic restoration in medial and lateral MAT (MMAT and LMAT) procedures and to compare their outcomes. We hypothesized that (1) the anatomic differences between the medial and lateral menisci will mean a less accurate anatomic restoration for MMAT and (2) clinical outcomes after MMAT will be inferior compared with LMAT.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:We retrospectively evaluated 20 patients who underwent MMAT using the bone plug technique and 21 patients who underwent LMAT using the keyhole technique at a single institution from July 2014 to June 2019. Demographic data, previous surgeries, and concomitant procedures were recorded, as were lower limb alignment and osteoarthritis grade on radiographs. Using preoperative and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, the meniscal position, rotation, extrusion, and intrameniscal signal intensity were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores.Results:The mean follow-up was 41.15 ± 18.86 and 45.43 ± 21.32 months for the MMAT and LMAT patients, respectively. Concomitant procedures were performed in 90% of MMATs and 15% of LMATs. There was no significant difference between the native and postoperative root positions after LMAT; however, for MMAT, the position of the anterior root was located significantly posteriorly (P = .002) and medially (P = .007) compared with preoperatively. In addition, the allograft medial meniscus was restored in a more internally rotated position (P = .029). MMATs also exhibited significantly increased meniscal extrusion compared with LMATs (posterior horn, P < .001; midbody, P = .027; anterior horn, P = .006). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at final follow-up in intrameniscal signal intensity or clinical scores.Conclusion:LMAT showed higher accuracy than MMAT in restoring meniscal position and rotation, and there was less meniscal extrusion. However, clinical scores improved after both LMAT and MMAT compared with preoperative values, and midterm clinical outcomes were similar. The small anatomical errors seen in the MMAT technique were not clinically relevant at midterm follow-up.