Lateral Mass Screw Insertion Research Articles

Investigation of long lateral mass screw insertion torque.

Here, we assessed a new trajectory and insertion torque for the placement of a long lateral mass screw (LLMS) that offers stronger posterior fixation versus a shorter lateral mass screw (LMS) in the posterior cervical spine. We report a short technical note of the insertion torque of LLMS. The insertion trajectory/torque was evaluated in 30 patients (10 males and 20 females) undergoing posterior cervical LLMS fusions (2021-2023). Patients averaged 65 years of age. Pathology included eight cervical spine injuries, ten cord injuries, four dislocations/fractures, and eight other entities. Variables studied included the length of the LLMS inserted from C3-7, screw deviation rates, insertion torque, and adverse events. A total of 146 screws were inserted: 11 pedicle screws (PSs) and 135 LLMS. The average insertion torque was 105.9 cNm for PS and 64.9 cNm for LLMS. As the screw lengthened by 1 mm, the insertion torque increased by approximately 4.4 cNm. Here, we documented that the insertion torque of LLMS was 66.1 cNm, greater than the 51.0 cNm for LMS, which should provide stronger posterior cervical fixation.

Preoperative planning with 3D navigation software increases lateral mass screw insertion accuracy for open cervical spinal surgeries

Preoperative planning with 3D navigation software increases lateral mass screw insertion accuracy for open cervical spinal surgeries

Posterior Spinal Screw Fixation Techniques and Trajectories: General Overview and an Analysis of How Often They Are Used

Abstract Background: There is a great variety of techniques (translaminar, transfacet, and extrapedicular screws) apart from the traditional pedicle screw in posterior spinal instrumentation. The latter technique is the most widely used around the world (except from the cervical region) since it tends to obtain very good results with a simple approach with fewer complications.Therefore, other trajectories are usually reserved for more specific cases in which the insertion of these purely pedicle screws is not possible. Objective: The objective of this study was to review and analyze the use of different techniques and trajectories of posterior spinal instrumentation by different spinal surgeons around the world. Material and Methods: We developed a survey including posterior spinal screw techniques and trajectories. In this article, we present the data resulting from 122 answers from different spinal surgeons (neuro, orthopedic surgery). Results: Despite advances in the development of new technologies such as neuronavigation (17%) and robotic (1%) available on the market, nowadays, the gold-standard technique for spinal screw insertion is the fluoroscopy-assisted freehand approach (54%). The lumbar spine is the most instrumented spinal region (31%), with a clear preference for purely transpedicular screws. Thoracic and sacroiliac areas presented a greater diversity of screw trajectories. In the cervical spine, there is a clear tendency toward the insertion of lateral mass screws (85% in the atlantoaxial region and 70% in the subaxial region), as opposed to the use of pedicular screws. This is mainly due to the complexity of this area and the risk of damaging important neurovascular structures relatively close to the pedicles. Unexpectedly, two additional techniques were presented: cortical bone trajectory for lumbar screw fixation (for osteoporotic patients) and S2-alar-iliac screw fixation (more used than iliac screws alone). Conclusions: This survey demonstrates that the most used spinal trajectory in the thoracolumbar spinal region is the traditional pedicle screw insertion. Lateral mass was the most common place to insert screws in the subaxial cervical region. The use of robotic systems can improve the position of the screws of more complex techniques. We consider that the different techniques should be known since every surgery will be adapted to the patient’s anatomy and needs.

Nuance in Craniovertebral Junction Surgical Approach for Posterior C1-C2 Harms Stabilization: "Window Transposition" of the External Vertebral Venous Plexus for Bloodless C1 Lateral Mass Screw Insertion: Anatomical Aspects and Technical Notes.

Atlas and axis instrumentation may be necessary in cases of several craniocervical junction pathologies. According to the Harms technique, C1-C2 polyaxial screws are inserted respectively in the C1 lateral masses and in C2 pedicles. C1 lateral mass screw insertion requires the careful subperiosteal dissection of the posterior elements of C1, the identification of the screw entry point by the downward distraction of C2 nerve root, and the cautious sparing of the overlying posterior external vertebral venous plexus (peVVP), whose bleeding, obstructing the surgical field, is sometimes barely controlled by hemostatic agents and swabbing. The authors describe in detail the anatomical aspects of an alternative surgical technique developed for the microsurgical transposition of the C1-C2 interposed external vertebral venous plexus in the case of Harms C1-C2 screw stabilization. The longitudinal median incision of the atlantoaxial membrane, followed by bilateral subperiosteal dissection and microsurgical section respectively at the inferior borders of the C1 laminae and at the superior borders of the C2 laminae, allows, as a "window opening," the symmetrical mediolateral transposition of the peVVP. This procedure provides a faster and cleaner anatomical exposition of the posterior surface of the C1 lateral mass and the C2 isthmus, preventing troublesome intraoperative venous bleeding that hinders C1 lateral mass screw insertion.

Freehand Pre-drilling Technique for Lateral Mass Screw Fixation Is More Efficient and Reliable Versus Sequential Drilling Technique: A Sawbone Analysis.

Background Since posterior cervical fixation with lateral mass screws was introduced in 1979, multiple techniques have been described in the literature. However, no study to date has determined whether pre-drilling all lateral masses prior to screw insertion has a benefit over the traditional sequential drilling and screw insertion on the alignment of the screw-rod construct. This study sought to determine the efficacy and efficiency in achieving alignment with a novel pre-drilling technique compared to the traditional sequential drilling technique. The authors hypothesized that the novel pre-drilling technique could be applied more quickly and precisely than the traditional sequential drilling technique. Methods Eight cervical spine sawbones models were utilized to place 64 lateral mass screws by two surgeons. The pre-drilling technique was utilized to place 32 screws in four models, and the sequential drilling technique was utilized to place the 32 screws in the remaining four models. In the traditional sequential drilling technique, each lateral mass underwent screw tract preparation and insertion before proceeding to the subsequent vertebra. In the pre-drilling technique, all lateral masses were marked and drilled sequentially before screw placement. CT imaging with 3D reconstructions was generated for all models. Variability in screw placement and time taken to fully instrument the models were compared. Results The mean time to completion of the pre-drilling technique was 337 ± 22 seconds compared to 490 ± 22 seconds with the traditional technique (p<0.01). There was a significantly higher variability in the coronal plane within the traditional group between C5 and C6 compared to other adjacent vertebrae (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the start point variability and the overall tightness of line fit between the techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that a novel pre-drilling technique for lateral mass screw insertion may be more efficient and reliable than the traditional sequential drilling technique. In addition, this technique may reduce the need for rod contouring or additional implants to optimize the alignment of cervical instrumentation. However, further clinical studies are necessary to validate the potential clinical and radiologic benefits of this described technique.

Innovative C-Arm-Free Navigation Technique for Posterior Spinal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Subluxation: A Technical Note.

Study design: Technical note. Objectives: To present a novel C-arm-free technique guided by navigation to insert and place a C1 lateral mass screw. Background and Objectives: Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a relatively common sequelae in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and upper cervical trauma. If they present with severe symptoms, surgical intervention such as posterior fusion is indicated. The established treatment for AAS is fixation with a C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw (modified Goel technique) to achieve bony fusion. However, this technique requires fluoroscopy for C1 screw insertion. To avoid exposing the operating team to radiation, we present here a novel C-arm-free C1 lateral mass screw insertion technique for AAS. Materials and Methods: A 67-year-old man was referred to our hospital with neck pain, quadriparesis, and clumsiness and numbness of both upper and lower limbs. He had undergone C3-6 posterior fusion previously in another hospital. In physical examination, he had severe muscle weakness of bilateral upper limbs and hypoesthesia of all four limbs. He had hyper-reflexia of bilateral lower limbs and pollakiuria. His Japanese orthopedic score was 8 points out of 17. Preoperative radiograms showed AAS with an atlantodental interval (ADI) of 7 mm. MRI indicated retro-odontoid pseudotumor and severe spinal cord compression at the C1-2 level. The patient underwent posterior atlantoaxial fixation under navigation guidance. To prevent epidural bleeding during the insertion and placement of a C1 lateral mass screw, we have here defined a novel screw insertion technique. Results: The surgical time was clocked as 127 min and blood loss was 100 mL. There were no complications per-operatively or in the postoperative period. The patient showed almost full recovery (JOA 16/17) at two months follow-up and a solid bony fusion was noticed in the radiograms at one year follow-up. Conclusions: This novel surgical procedure and C1 lateral mas screw placement technique is a practical and safe method in recent advances of AAS treatment. Procedurally, the technique helps prevent epidural bleeding from the screw entry point and also allows for proper C1 screw insertion under navigation guidance without exposing surgeons and staff to the risk of fluoroscopic radiation.

Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography.

Pedicle screws (PSs) or lateral mass screws (LMSs) are used in posterior cervical spine fixation. The former are more firmly fixed but are associated with the risk of neurovascular injury and should be inserted using intraoperative imaging or navigation, which may prolong the surgical duration and is not feasible in all hospitals. This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of LMS insertions without fluoroscopic guidance and screw loosening rates at 6 months postoperatively using computed tomography (CT). We examined 38 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion using 206 LMSs in the C3-C6 range between January 2018 and July 2021. The direction of screw insertion followed the Magerl method, and we inserted screws as bicortically as possible without intraoperative imaging. The screw position was examined using CT at 1 week postoperatively. Screw insertion angles, bicortical insertion rate, facet violation, and neurovascular injury were evaluated. Screw loosening with unicortical and bicortical screws (US and BS, respectively) was investigated using CT at 6 months postoperatively. The average LMS length was 14.1 mm. The average axial and sagittal angles were 33.9° and 29.2°, respectively. Among the 206 LMSs inserted, 167 were BS; of these, 94.6% had screw length protrusion of 0-2 mm. Facet violation was observed in 3.4% of all screws but without neurovascular injury. Six months postoperatively, loosening of 25 screws (12.1%) occurred, including 17 (18.3%) USs and 8 (8.39%) BSs. The screw loosening rate was significantly higher in US than for BS (43.6% [17/39] vs. 4.8% [8/167], P<0.01). Over 80% of LMSs were inserted bicortically without intraoperative imaging. By devising the screw length selection process, we inserted for screw loosening was more common in US and more likely at the fixed end.

Free Hand Technique for Lateral Mass Screws Insertion: A Safe, Accurate, and Simple Procedure for Posterior Cervical Spine Fixation

Free Hand Technique for Lateral Mass Screws Insertion: A Safe, Accurate, and Simple Procedure for Posterior Cervical Spine Fixation

O-Arm Navigated Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lower Cervical Fracture-Dislocation.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with O‐arm navigation in the treatment of lower cervical fracture‐dislocation.MethodsA retrospective clinical study was performed involving 42 consecutive patients with lower cervical spine fracture‐dislocation who underwent CPS fixation surgery with O‐arm navigation (CPS group) or received conventional lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation surgery (LMS group) between August 2015 and August 2019. Accuracy of CPS position was evaluated by postoperative CT. The clinical parameters including preoperative and final follow‐up Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, preoperative Sub‐axial Injury Classification (SLIC) score, number of fixation segments, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, injury mechanism, injury location, surgical complications were also assessed between the two groups.ResultsIn LMS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.5 ± 0.9, ASIA score improvement was 0.8 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.0 ± 1.8, mean operation time was 204 ± 89 min, intraoperative blood loss was 311 ± 127 ml. In CPS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.3 ± 1.2, ASIA score improvement was 0.9 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.2 ± 2.4, mean operation time is 241 ± 85 min, intraoperative blood loss is about 327 ± 120 ml. There was no significant difference in terms of above clinical parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05), the fixation segments in CPS group (3.5 ± 1.1) were less than that in LMS group (4.2 ± 0.7) (P = 0.037). The accuracy of CPS insertion was evaluated based on postoperative CT. Of all the 118 CPSs, 83 (70.3%) were defined as Grade 0; 27 (22.9%) as Grade 1; eight (6.8%) as Grade 2; and none as Grade 3. CPS malposition rate in this study was 6.8%. In this study, there was no direct intraoperative or postoperative complication caused by CPS or LMS insertion. All the operations were successfully completed in two groups. One of the patients in LMS group presented cerebrospinal fluid leak caused by bone fragment broken of the dural sac, which led to delayed incision healing. CPS group and LMS group both had two patients who suffered pulmonary infection after surgery. A total of 78.6% of the patients showed evidence of neurologic recovery. Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases and maintained throughout the follow‐up duration.ConclusionIn the treatment of lower cervical spine fracture‐dislocation, cervical pedicle screw insertion with O‐arm navigation is a safe and effective method for posterior fixation.

Feasibility of lateral mass screw insertion in patients with the risky triad of C1: evaluation of the over-the-arch technique.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and complications of the over-the-arch (OTA) technique for screw insertion into the C1 lateral mass in patients in whom conventional techniques (i.e., posterior arch [PA] and inferior lateral mass [ILM]) are not feasible due to 1) PA with a very small height (< 3.5 mm), 2) a caudally tilted PA blocking the inferior part of the C1 lateral mass, or 3) loss of height at the ILM (< 3.5 mm). The authors reviewed the medical records of 60 patients who underwent C1 screw fixation with the OTA technique (13 screws) and the PA/ILM technique (107 screws) between 2011 and 2019. Vertebral artery (VA) injuries, screw malposition, and bony union were radiologically assessed. Clinical outcome measures, including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score, and occipital neuralgia, were recorded. Thirteen OTA screws were successfully inserted without any major complications. NDI and JOA scale scores did not show significant differences between the two groups at final follow-up. No VA injuries were recognized during screw insertion. There was no evidence of ischemic damage to the VA or bony erosion in the occiput or atlas. Medial wall violation was observed in 1 screw (7.7%); however, no C0-1, C1-2, or lateral wall violations were observed. No patients developed new-onset neuralgia postoperatively after C1 fixation with the OTA technique. The OTA technique was safe and useful for C1 screw fixation in patients in whom conventional techniques could not be employed.

C1 lateral mass screw insertion using cannulated, navigated screws: preliminary results of a novel technique

Purpose The upper cervical spine region is densely populated by neural and vascular structures impeding the approach for fusion surgery. Technological advancement simplify the approach to C1-C2 fusion, thus reduce risks. The current paper purpose is to describe initial experience with a novel technique modification for C1 lateral screw insertion that incorporates cannulated-navigated screw system with intra-operative 3D imaging. Methods A single-center single surgeon database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent placement of C1 lateral mass screw insertion using the novel technique modification described below, on 2020. This cohort was retrospectively analyzed and compared with a cohort of patients who were operated on by the same surgeon with non-cannulated, navigated screws with intra-operative 3D imaging (O-arm, Medtronic, USA) between 2011 and 2019. Following navigated starting hole and drilling of the C1 lateral mass, a blunt guide-wire is used to palpate the hole and cannulated screw is advanced to the correct position over the wire. After initial purchase, a navigated screw driver is used for final screw depth position. Results Twelve C1 lateral mass screws were inserted in six patients using this novel cannulated-navigated screw placement technique and compared to 24 patients operated using navigated non-cannulated screws. Minimal Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) was recorded in five of six cases undergoing the novel cannulated navigated placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Comparison to non-cannulated cohort demonstrated an EBL of 83CC vs. 354CC (Not significant). Mean surgery time was 97min and 118min for the cannulated-navigated and navigated only procedures (p = 0.03, statistically significant) respectively. In the current cohort, all screws were rated in optimal position and no repositioning procedures were performed. Conclusion The new method presented allows for faster and possibly safer and more accurate C1 lateral mass screw insertion.

Posterior First and Second Cervical Vertebrae Fusion by Screw Fixation Technique using the Modern Pre-fabricated Template Method on Cadaver Samples

Introduction:C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicular screws insertion are used for C1-C2 posterior fusion. Fluoroscopy Guided technique is routinely used for screw placement but it is associated with risk of injury to spinal cord and vertebral artery. 3D printing has developed rapidly in the fields of medicine. It is helpful in improving precise treatment and used for instrumentation in spine. We want to evaluate the accuracy of C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pedicle screws insertion by Pre-Fabricated Template made by three-dimensional (3D) printing.Materials and methods:Five cervical samples were obtained from cadavers. Based on fine-cut CT scan 3D-images reconstructed and the path of the screws designed by special software. A template produced by 3D-printer from 3D images. After printing the templates, they were fixed on the relevant vertebra in the operation room and based on the template path, C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicular screws were inserted. Placement of the screws was evaluated using CT scans post-operatively.Results:A total of 14 screws were inserted by above-mentioned method. After evaluation with CT scans none of the screws were entered in the spinal canal. Two screws had vertebral artery canal perforation with less than 50% breach. Violation was judged as noncritical and would probably not have resulted in injury to vertebral artery.Conclusions:The accuracy of C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw insertion is acceptable with pre-fabricated template and can provide a useful aid for screw placement.

Lateral mass screw placement in the atlas: description of a novel surgical technique, radiographic parameters, and review of the literature.

Numerous techniques of C1 lateral mass screw placement have been described. We sought to delineate the radiographic angle of safety medially and laterally and describe a novel surgical technique of C1 lateral mass screw placement. We sought to (I) determine the angle of safety medially and laterally of the C1 lateral mass; (II) assess the size available of the lateral mass in the AP and coronal planes; (III) describe novel technique of insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw utilizing navigation and a novel start point. We retrospectively reviewed cervical computed tomography (CT) images of normal adults. Radiographic measurements were then obtained using these images including the angle (degrees) of safety medially and lateral of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally, as well as the length and width (mm) of the C1 lateral masses. A novel surgical technique was used by identifying the confluence of the medial aspect of the posterior arch and the lateral mass. This confluence is then marked out as the C1 screw start point. Under navigation guidance, lateral mass screws were placed with 0 degrees of medial-lateral angulation from posterior to anterior. Forty-five patients with a mean age of 52.6±25.6 years (33% female) were included. The mean medial and lateral angle of safety of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally was 23±3.8 degrees and 32±5 degrees, respectively. Average length and width of the lateral mass was 17.7 and 13.3 mm respectively. This study describes the radiographic window of safety medially and laterally for safe and reproducible placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Further, a novel technique using a medial start point and navigation guidance with 0 degrees of angulation in the coronal plane is described. Further research is required to assess outcomes of patients utilizing this method as well as biomechanical studies to assess this construct strength compared to others that are frequently used.

The Intersection Between Lateral Mass and Inferomedial Edge of the C1 Posterior Arch: A Reference Point for C1 Lateral Mass Screw Insertion

ObjectiveTo determine the ideal Atlas (C1) lateral mass screw placement and trajectory using the intersection between the lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch as an easily identifiable and reproducible medial reference point. Selection of an ideal entry point and trajectory of C1 lateral mass screw insertion can help to minimize neurovascular injuries. While various techniques for screw insertion have been proposed in the past, they all require extensive dissection of the C1 lateral mass, which can cause profuse bleeding. MethodsNinety-three 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructed images of C1 lateral masses in adult patients were utilized to simulate the placement of C1 lateral mass screws via 4 entry points and 2 trajectory angles referencing off of a medial reference point using Vero’s VISI 17 software. The safety during screw insertion simulation, as well as the screw length, were evaluated. ResultsWe found that C1 lateral mass screws could be safely placed bilaterally at 3 mm lateral to the reference point in both 0° and 15° medial screw angulation without violation of the cortex. The 15° medial angulation allowed for longer (18 mm) screws than the 0° angulation. ConclusionWe recommend starting C1 lateral mass screws 3 mm lateral to the intersection between the lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch at a 15° medial angulation.

An alternative way of C1 screwing: Supralaminar C1 lateral mass screws.

Study Design:This study involves literature review, technical note, and case series.Objectives:The objectives were to analyze indications and contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages for C1 lateral mass screw (LMS) insertion above or partially above the arch, to descript technical features, and to give examples of the practical application of this technique and investigated its safety.Methods:A literature review was carried out in English and Russian in PubMed, Google Scholar, and eLibrary databases. We selected four patients, treated in our clinic, which was carried out partially supralaminar C1 LMS.Results:Only three descriptions of supralaminar C1 LMS were found in the literature. Four adult patients underwent posterior C1–C2 screw fixation with C1 LMS along the superior edge of the C1 arch at our clinic. Partially supralaminar C1 screws were inserted on one of the sides due to the difficulties of using classical techniques. The main reasons for supralaminar screw fixation were narrow C1 lamina, hypertrophied venous plexus, and intraoperative failures of classic techniques application (broken screw trajectory, profuse venous bleeding from the plexus). The average follow-up time for the patients was 2.7 years, no complications were noted, and all had a satisfactory spinal fusion.Conclusions:The proposed types of C1 LMS above or partially above the C1 arch can be useful alternative method of C1 screwing in selected patients. Indications for the use of the supralaminar C1 LMS method can be narrow C1 posterior arch and pedicle, pronounced C1-C2 venous plexus, some V3 segment anomalies at C1 level, small arthritic inferior part of lateral mass, and intraoperative failures of classic techniques application.

Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in the Cervical Spine: Introducing a New Technique.

Study DesignThis was designed as a randomized double blind study to compare the classical Magerl technique of insertion of lateral mass screws with the authors’ technique. The observations regarding length, outcome, and radiology was done by a group blinded to the technique used.PurposeThe present study was designed with the objective of identifying the optimal technique for introducing the lateral mass screws that uses the maximum possible dimension of the lateral mass.Overview of LiteratureLateral mass screw fixation is a common surgery that is performed in the cervical spine. Various modifications for the procedure have been described, such as changes in the entry point, angulation of the screws, and modifications in the exit point. These do not allow the insertion of longer screws that can give more purchase on the bone.MethodsFrom January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018, 176 patients who were scheduled to undergo lateral mass screw fixation were enrolled. They were randomized into two groups; we inserted lateral mass screws using our new technique for one group and by using the classical Magerl technique for the other group. Intraoperative measurements were used to assess the bone-screw interface length. Postoperative radiography and postoperative computed tomography were performed to assess the trajectory of the screws.ResultsTotal 88 patients were included in the study group, including 68 men. The control group included 65 men. The most common indication for surgery was cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The average bi-cortical length that was measured intraoperatively was 19.9 mm in the study group and 16.3 mm in the control group. This was significantly different from the average lengths of screws in the control group.ConclusionsThe trajectory that involves an entry point as close as possible to the posterior inferior medial angle of the lateral mass cuboid and traverses a distance of about 20 mm to obtain a bi-cortical purchase in the diagonally opposite angle may provide a much better and firmer bony purchase in the lateral mass than conventional points of entry and trajectories.

Modified C1 lateral mass screw insertion using a threaded K-wire. A technical note

Instrumented fixation of the C1-C2 motion segment is a standard surgical technique to stabilise that spinal segment. Instability at C1-C2 can arise from a number of conditions. Fixation of the C1 lateral mass usually involves dissection and exposure of the C2 nerve root and the posterior wall of the C2 lateral mass which can result in significant bleeding from the venous plexus. Whilst image guidance is increasing in accessibility, there are few public hospitals in Australia that have access to this technology. The authors describe their technique for insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw over a threaded K-wire to avoid extensive dissection of the C2 nerve root, reducing the risk of significant haemorrhage from the epidural venous plexus during the procedure. A retrospective analysis was undertaken on 18 consecutive patients who underwent C1-C2 instrumented fixation using this technique. Indications for C1-C2 instrumented fixation included traumatic injury (10 patients), failure of non-operative management of odontoid fractures (5 patients), pathological fractures of C2 (2 patients) and inflammatory conditions (1 patient). All patients underwent successful C1-C2 stabilisation using this technique. Blood loss did not exceed 400mls in any patient. There were no vertebral artery injuries and no patient experienced a neurological deterioration. The authors propose that their technique for insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw over a threaded K-wire is safe and effective with a low risk of neurological or vertebral artery injury. The technique may be considered as a slight modification of the Harm’s procedure to reduce disturbance of the adjacent venous plexus and thereby reduction in intraoperative bleeding and operative time.

3-Dimensional printing templates guiding versus free hand technique for cervical lateral mass screw fixation: A prospective study

ObjectiveIn this randomized, single blind and controlled study, the feasibility and precision of 3-dimensional printing templates for cervical lateral mass screw insertion was evaluated. MethodsA total of 6 patients (72 screws), who were diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and developmental cervical spinal stenosis, were randomly divided into A and B two groups. All subjects underwent modified posterior surgery with using cervical lateral mass screws insertion (C4–C6). Group A underwent surgeries with screw insertion assisted by the guidance of 3-dimensional printing templates and Group B underwent surgeries with screw insertion by freehand. The criteria of the accuracy of screw placement were set as the main evaluation indicators. ResultsThere was no significant difference between the 2 groups in age, improvement rate of JOA, operation time and blood loss. According to Bayard’s criteria, 32 screws (88.9%) were described as “acceptable” in group A and 22 screws (61.1%) were described as “acceptable” in Group B (P < 0.05). Based on our criteria, the “excellent and good” rate of screws was 83.3% in group A and 47.2% in Group B, respectively (P < 0.05). The precision of screws’ location in Group A was superior to that in Group B. Conclusions3-Dimensional printing screw insertion templates may achieve (1) comprehensive visualization of the cervical vertebrae and lateral mass and the individual surgical planning using the 3-dimensional model preoperatively. (2) increasing the accuracy of cervical lateral mass screw insertion.

Suboccipital neuralgia after C1 pedicle screw insertion: do we neglect atlantooccipital joint violation? - Case report and literature review

BackgroundOccipital neuralgia is one of the postoperative complications of C1 lateral mass screw insertion, which was deemed to be related with the C2 nerve root dysfunction.Case presentationA 52-year-old female patient presented with gradually progressive numbness and weakness in her extremities for 6 months. X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan revealed obvious anterior atlantoaxial dislocation (ADD), which was reducible on extensive view. Atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation and bone graft was performed. Immediately after the operation, the neurological symptom significantly improved. The patient complained of restricted cervical rotation and suboccipital neuralgia which was exacerbated by rotation with an intensity of 7 on a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 at postoperative day 5. While a satisfactory reduction was detected in the postoperative CT, violation of the left atlantooccipital joint was observed in the left C1 screw. Nimesulide (daily dosage of 0.2 g) and bracing were recommended immediately. At the 2 month follow-up, both the neurological improvement and reduction were maintained. The VAS of suboccipital neuralgia is 3 and decreased to 1 at 6 months postoperative. Bony fusion of the left atlantooccipital joint was confirmed by CT scan at 6 months postoperative. The patient complained that the suboccipital neuralgia was tolerable without the assistance of braces or medications for pain. At the 18 month follow-up, only stiffness of head flexion and rotation was observed without suboccipital neuralgia.ConclusionSuboccipital neuralgia after atlantooccipital joint violation of C1 pedicle screw placement most likely results from C1 nerve root irritation. As the corresponding dermatome differs from the distributing region and aggravated factor of C2 nerve root dysfunction, neuralgia due to C1 irritation was only localized at suboccipital region and exacerbated by rotation.

Accuracy Assessment of Pedicle and Lateral Mass Screw Insertion Assisted by Customized 3D-Printed Drill Guides: A Human Cadaver Study.

Accurate cervical screw insertion is of paramount importance considering the risk of damage to adjacent vital structures. Recent research in 3-dimensional (3D) technology describes the advantage of patient-specific drill guides for accurate screw positioning, but consensus about the optimal guide design and the accuracy is lacking. To find the optimal design and to evaluate the accuracy of individualized 3D-printed drill guides for lateral mass and pedicle screw placement in the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Five Thiel-embalmed human cadavers were used for individualized drill-guide planning of 86 screw trajectories in the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Using 3D bone models reconstructed from acquired computed tomography scans, the drill guides were produced for both pedicle and lateral mass screw trajectories. During the study, the initial minimalistic design was refined, resulting in the advanced guide design. Screw trajectories were drilled and the realized trajectories were compared to the planned trajectories using 3D deviation analysis. The overall entry point and 3D angular accuracy were 0.76±0.52 mm and 3.22±2.34°, respectively. Average measurements for the minimalistic guides were 1.20 mm for entry points, 5.61° for the 3D angulation, 2.38° for the 2D axial angulation, and 4.80° for the 2D sagittal angulation. For the advanced guides, the respective measurements were 0.66 mm, 2.72°, 1.26°, and 2.12°, respectively. The study ultimately resulted in an advanced guide design including caudally positioned hooks, crosslink support structure, and metal inlays. The novel advanced drill guide design yields excellent drilling accuracy.