Lateral Compartment Osteoarthritis Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Large Single Surgeon Cohort

IntroductionLateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. However, due to the rarity of the procedure, long-term outcomes and survivorship are poorly understood. We report the clinical and radiographic outcomes after lateral UKA. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent lateral UKA by a single fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon from 2001 to 2021 with a minimum two year follow up. There were 161 knees in 153 patients (average age 69 years) that met inclusion criteria, with a mean follow up of 10.0 years (range 0.05 to 22.2). All patients underwent the procedure via a minimally invasive lateral parapatellar approach with a fixed-bearing implant. Patient demographics, complications, radiographic findings, patient-reported outcomes, and the need for revision surgery were evaluated. Survivorship was defined with the endpoint as revision of components. ResultsThere were eight patients (5.0%) who underwent conversion to TKA for lateral UKA implant failure or progression of arthritis. There were three patients (1.9%) who underwent ipsilateral medial UKA due to medial compartment arthritis progression with preserved mechanical alignment and patello-femoral joint. There were eight additional procedures that did not require implant changes, including five irrigation and debridements for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (3.1%), two wound closures for dehiscence (1.3%), and one loose body removal (0.6%). ConclusionLateral UKA showed a survivorship rate of 98.0% at 5 years, 96.0% at 10 years, and 94.5% at 15 years. When including patients who underwent additional surgery for the progression of arthritis, survivorship was 97.4% at 5 years, 95.4% at 10 years, and 91.3% at 15 years. Lateral UKA should be seen as a durable treatment option for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis.

Robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10-year follow-up.

There is a lack of literature reporting on long-term outcomes following robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study assessed the long-term survivorship, patient-reported satisfaction and pain scores following robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). A single surgeon's database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA with a cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis prior to May 2015. Patients were contacted to determine implant survivorship, satisfaction and pain. Kaplan-Meier models were applied to analyse survival. A total of 77 knees (70 patients) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.5 years (range: 8.1-13.3) were included. Five knees were revised, corresponding to a 10-year survivorship of 96.1% and estimated survival time of 12.7 ± 0.3 years (95% confidence interval: 12.2-13.2) with all-cause revision as the endpoint. Unexplained pain (40.0%) and progression of OA (40.0%) in contralateral compartments were the most reported reasons for revision. Among patients without revision, 94.4% were either satisfied or very satisfied with their lateral UKA and the average pain score was 1.1. Robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA led to high implant survivorship and patient satisfaction, and low pain scores at long-term follow-up. Progression of OA in contralateral compartments and unexplained pain were the most frequent reasons for revision. These findings support the continued use of robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment OA; however, its clinical value over conventional techniques remains to be established in prospective comparative studies. Therapeutic Level IV.

Age and medial compartmental OA were important predictors of the lateral compartmental OA in the discoid lateral meniscus: Analysis using machine learning approach.

The objective of this study was to develop a machine learning model that would predict lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in the discoid lateral meniscus (DLM), from which to then identify factors contributing to lateral compartment OA, with a key focus on the patient's age. Data were collected from 611 patients with symptomatic DLM diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging between April 2003 and May 2022. Twenty features, including demographic, clinicaland radiological dataand six algorithms were used to develop the predictive machine learning models. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis was performed on the best model, in addition to subgroup analyses according to age. Extreme gradient boosting classifierwas identified as the best prediction model, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.968, the highest among all the models, regardless of age (AUROC of 0.977 in young age and AUROC of 0.937 in old age). In the SHAP analysis, the most predictive feature was age, followed by the presence of medial compartment OA. In the subgroup analysis, the most predictive feature was age in young age, whereas the most predictive feature was the presence of medial compartment OA in old age. The machine learning model developed in this study showed a high predictive performance with regard to predicting lateral compartment OA of the DLM. Age was identified as the most important factor, followed by medial compartment OA. In subgroup analysis, medial compartmental OA was found to be the most important factor in the older age group, whereas age remained the most important factor in the younger age group. These findings provide insights that may prove useful for the establishment of strategies for the treatment of patients with symptomatic DLM. Level III.

Mid-term effects of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for the medial compartment osteoarthritis with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency by proportioning with the pure medial compartment osteoarthritis

Objective: To evaluate the mid-term efficacy of one-stage unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) with ACL deficiency. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of 13 patients (14 knees) who underwent UKA with ACL reconstruction for knee medial compartment OA combined with ACL deficiency in Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences from January 2012 to January 2020 were retrospective analyzed. A 1∶1 proportioning study was conducted with 13 patients (14 knees) who underwent UKA due to medial compartment OA with intact ACL during the same period. The matching conditions were the same gender, age, surgical side, anesthesia method, comorbidities, and imaging lesions. There were 26 patients (28 knees) in the two groups, including 6 males (6 knees) and 20 females (22 knees), aged (58.9±4.2) years. The range of motion (ROM) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were used to evaluate the knee joint function at the last follow-up. The anteroposterior, lateral and axial X-ray films of the knee joint and the weight-bearing full-length X-ray films of the lower limbs were taken during follow-up. The hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, the posterior slope angle (PSA) of tibial prosthesis, and the anterior tibial translation (ATT) were recorded and compared between the two groups. The progression of lateral compartment OA, prosthesis loosening, and dislocation were evaluated. The mid-term follow-up clinical efficacy of the two surgical methods was compared, and the etiology of the patients was analyzed to verify the clinical efficacy and patient selection of one-stage UKA combined with ACL reconstruction. Results: The follow-up time of the two groups was (7.14±2.45) years. At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in joint ROM between the combined group and the UKA group (120.90°±2.95° vs 122.29°±3.22°, P=0.260). There was no significant difference in OKS score between the two groups [(42.50±1.99) vs (43.21±2.26), P=0.380]. There was no significant difference in HKA angle and ATT distance between the two groups before operation (both P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the results were better than those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in HKA Angle between the combined group and the simple group (177.79°±1.25 ° vs 177.86°±1.29°, P=0.880). Tibial prosthesis PSA and ATT distance were not significantly different between the two groups [(4.57°±0.94° vs 4.50°±1.34°and (0.21±0.89) mm vs (0.14±1.35) mm, both P>0.05)]. There was no prosthesis loosening and obvious progression of lateral compartment OA in both groups at the last follow-up. Conclusion: For young patients with medial compartment OA secondary to ACL deficiency, UKA combined with ACL reconstruction is recommended, it can obtain good mid-term results.

Unicompartmental knee replacement combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides comparable results to total knee replacement with no increased risk of complications.

There is controversy about the management of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) in young, active patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. This study compares the subjective, radiological, and functional results of total knee replacement (TKR) vs. combined medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) with ACL reconstruction. Twelve patients suffering from medial OA and ACL deficiency with varus knee deformity and/or tibial slope<10° and absence of patellofemoral-related problems were eligible for combined UKR and ACL reconstruction (Group A). Twenty-six patients matched for age, male/female ratio and body mass index who received TKR in the same time frame were included as a control group (Group B). Oxford Knee Score (OKS), WOMAC index of osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and routine X-rays were used for assessment. Ten years after surgery, the mean overall KOOS score, OKS, WOMAC index increased from preoperatively, showing a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). In terms of KOOS, OKS, or WOMAC scores at the most recent follow-up, there was no discernible difference between the groups (p=n.s.). Three years following surgery, one female patient in group A received revision TKR due to the lateral compartment's osteoarthritis developing and the patient's pain persisting. Concerning radiographic assessment, at the most recent follow-up (average 7.9years in group A and 8.8years in group B), there were no radiographic indications of implant loosening or proof of pathologic radiolucent lines. UKR combined with ACL restoration offers clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to TKR 10years following surgery with no elevated risk of complications.

Short term outcomes following robotic arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Robotic-arm assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) is associated with improved accuracy of implant positioning and excellent early functional outcomes. However, there is paucity of evidence regarding outcomes following RA-UKA for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term clinical and patient reported outcomes of lateral compartment UKA, utilising robotic-arm assistance. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 21 consecutive patients who underwent lateral RA-UKA. The study included 9 (42.9%) males and 12 (57.1%) females with a mean age of 63.4 ± 9.2 years. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was measured pre-operatively and at 1-year post-operatively, while range of motion (ROM) and complications were also recorded. There was significant improvement of OKS at 1 year's follow up compared with the baseline score (21.8 ± 5.6 vs. 45.2 ± 2.8 respectively; p < 0.001). There was also an improvement in pre-operative ROM when compared to ROM at 1 year's follow up (123.5° ± 8° vs. 131.5° ± 6.3° respectively; p < 0.001). None of the study patients underwent revision surgery within 1 year's follow-up. In our study, lateral RA-UKA resulted in significant improvements in clinical and patient reported outcomes with low complications rates. Further long-term comparative studies are needed to assess the utility of lateral RA-UKA vs. conventional UKA.

Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty of the Lateral Compartment: A Series of 246 Cases.

Isolated osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee is less common than that of the medial compartment, resulting in significantly fewer lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) being performed. This study aimed to evaluate results of a fixed-bearing UKA for the treatment of lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. A prospectively collected cohort of 255 patients undergoing fixed-bearing UKA of the lateral compartment using the Triathlon PKR (Stryker, Warsaw, IND) implant with a minimum 2-year follow-up was reviewed. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, radiographic alignment, complications, reoperations, and revisions were recorded. Patient factors and pre- and post-surgical alignment were assessed for their association with a minimum important change (MIC) of the total WOMAC score. A total of 246 implants with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (2-10.8 years) were included (4% lost to follow-up). The total WOMAC score increased from 61.3 ± 3.5 to 85.3 ± 7.5, exceeding the MIC in 215 patients (88%). Exceeding the MIC was not associated with age, body mass index, or alignment. The 5-year implant revision rate was 1.6% (3/187). The fixed-bearing Stryker Triathlon PKR implant for lateral UKA resulted in good clinical outcomes with a low revision rate at midterm follow-up. Body mass index, age, and pre- and post-surgical alignment did not correlate with the clinical outcome. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if the clinical improvement and low revision rate can be maintained.

Fixed lateral unicompartmental knee replacement is a reliable treatment for lateral compartment osteoarthritis after mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental replacement

PurposeLateral osteoarthritis following medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is usually treated with total knee replacement, however, lateral UKR is a less invasive option that preserves a well-functioning medial UKR. This study aimed to determine the 5-year outcome of the cemented Fixed Lateral Oxford UKR (FLO) when used for the treatment of severe lateral disease after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.MethodsForty-four knees with lateral bone-on-bone osteoarthritis (n = 43) and avascular necrosis (n = 1) treated with the FLO following medial Oxford UKR were followed up prospectively. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Tegner Activity Score (TAS) were collected pre- and post-operatively. Life-table analysis was used to determine survival rates.ResultsThe mean patient age at the time of FLO surgery was 74.4 years with a mean time of 12.1 years between the primary medial UKR and the conversion to a bi-UKR with a FLO. Mean follow-up of the FLO was 3.5 years. After FLO no intra-operative or medical complications, re-admissions, or mortality occurred. There was one reoperation in which a bearing was exchanged for a medial bearing dislocation. There were no revisions of the FLO, so the FLO survival rate at 5 years was 100% (24 at risk). The mean pre-operative OKS was 22, which significantly (p < 0.0001) improved to a mean of 42, 42, and 40 at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. The median TAS had a non-significant improvement from 2.5 (Range 0–8) pre-operatively to 2 (Range 1–6) at 5 years postoperatively.ConclusionThe FLO is a reliable treatment for lateral osteoarthritis following medial UKR. At 5 years there was a 100% survival of the FLO with a mean OKS of 40.Level of evidenceIV, Prospective Case Series.

Hinge prostheses in the revision of unicompartmental knee replacement: a descriptive analysis of data from the national joint registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an effective surgical strategy in patients with isolated medial or lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Study aims were to (1) describe the epidemiology of patients undergoing revision of UKR to a hinge knee replacement (HKR); (2) identify factors influencing time to revision; (3) evaluate HKR survival. An analysis of National Joint Registry data was undertaken, exploring revision of UKR to HKR between 2007 and April 2021. Descriptive analysis of eligible patients and Cox Regression to identify key determinants of time to revision were performed. Failure of HKR post-revision was assessed using survival analysis. 111 patients underwent revision of UKR to HKR. Median age at revision was 70years and most common indications were instability (n = 42) and infection (n = 22). The most common implant was a rotating HKR. Significant independent factors associated with earlier revision were periprosthetic fracture (p = 0.03) and malalignment (p = 0.03). Progressive osteoarthritis (p = 0.01) and higher ASA grades (3: p = 0.01, 4: p < 0.01) delayed time to revision; patient sex and age were not significant factors. Ten patients required subsequent re-revision; median age at re-revision was 61years. HKR revised from UKR had an 89.3% revision-free risk at 5years. Male sex (p < 0.01) and younger age (p < 0.01) were associated with re-revision. Factors associated with time to revision may be used to counsel patients prior to UKR. The survivorship of the HKR of 89.3% at 5years is concerning and careful consideration should be given when using this level of constraint when revising UKR in younger or male patients.

Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy With Patellar Osteochondral Allograft

The primary indications for performing a medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy are valgus knee malalignment, lateral knee compartment overload, lateral meniscus insufficiency, and/or lateral compartment osteoarthritis or cartilage damage. Without correction of this malalignment, there is an increased risk for chondral damage in the lateral and patellofemoral compartment of the knee. The optimal candidates for this procedure are young, active individuals with moderate to severe arthritis in the lateral compartment. Recently, preoperative planning for high tibial and distal femoral osteotomies (HTOs and DFOs) using 3-dimensional (3D) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has increased in popularity. Successful patient outcomes have been reported using this technique. This Technical Note illustrates our preferred technique that uses 3D PSI in addition to a patellar OCA transplant when treating a symptomatic cartilage lesion associated with genu valgum.

Short- and mid-term effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis of knee

To investigate the short- and mid-term effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for post-traumatic arthritis (PTA) of knee. The clinical data of 30 patients with PTA of unilateral knee between March 2014 and September 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 14 males and 16 females with an average of 64.5 years (range, 33-81 years). The average body mass index was 26.7 kg/m 2 (range, 19.8-35.6 kg/m 2). The types of injuries that caused PTA included intra-articular fracture in 16 cases, extra-articular fracture in 8 cases, and soft tissue injury in 6 cases. The initial injuries were treated by conservative therapy in 12 cases and by surgical therapy in 18 cases. Ten cases were medial compartment osteoarthritis and 20 cases were lateral compartment osteoarthritis. According to Kellgren-Lawrence staging, there were 19 cases of grade Ⅲ and 11 cases of grade Ⅳ. The operative time, the length of hospital stay, complications, and subjective satisfaction were recorded. The Oxford Knee Function Score (OKS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and knee range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate knee function. Weight-bearing X-ray films were taken to measure the femoro-tibial angle (FTA) and to assess alignment correction of the lower limb. The operative time ranged from 50 to 95 minutes (mean, 63.7 minutes), the length of hospital stay ranged from 3 to 8 days (mean, 6.9 days). Superficial infection occurred in 2 patients, while the remaining incisions healed by first intention. There was no deep vein thrombosis or neurovascular injury. All patients were followed up 17-109 months (median, 70 months). At last follow-up, OKS score, HSS score, and ROM in 30 cases significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Lower limb alignment was significantly corrected and there was significant difference in FTA of the varus and valgus knees between pre- and post-operation ( P<0.05). The patient satisfaction rate was 86.7% (26/30). Two cases developed contralateral osteoarthritis progression during follow-up. No bearing dislocation, prosthesis loosening or sinking occurred and none required further revision. For patients with PTA of knee, UKA can obtain definite short- and mid-term effectiveness with high patient satisfaction.

Effects of Lateral Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy on Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Background: Lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment increases the rate of lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT) with a concomitant varus-producing opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is an option yet to be evaluated biomechanically. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to clarify the biomechanical effects of the realignment procedure in the setting of LMAT. We hypothesized that (1) given the dependence of the lateral compartment on the lateral meniscus, a DFO and increasing degrees of varus would be insufficient to restore lateral compartment pressures to normal from a lateral meniscus-deficient state, and that (2) LMAT would restore lateral compartment pressures to the intact state while DFO would decrease lateral compartment pressures for any given state of the meniscus. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees underwent opening-wedge varus-producing DFO secured by an external fixator. Anatomic alignment was standardized to 6° of mechanical valgus, and each joint was tested in full extension. Submeniscal placement of thin film pressure sensors allowed for the recording of contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and contact area. The specimens were loaded on a biaxial dynamic testing machine with loading angles between 9° valgus and 6° varus of mechanical alignment. Conditions tested included intact meniscus, meniscal deficiency, and meniscal transplantation. Results: Isolated varus-producing DFO to 6° in the meniscus-deficient state failed to restore joint pressures and contact areas to the intact state, with significant changes in mean contact pressure (175%), mean peak contact pressure (135%), and contact area (–41%) (all P &lt; .05 vs intact), while LMAT restored all outcome measures (all P &gt; .05 compared with intact). After LMAT, every additional 1° of DFO correction contributed to a decrease in the mean contact pressure, peak pressure, and contact area of 5.6% (–0.0479 N/mm2), 5.9% (–0.154 N/mm2), and 1.4% (–6.99 mm2) for the lateral compartment and 7.3% (+0.034 N/mm2), 12.6% (+0.160 N/mm2), and 4.3% (+20.53 mm2) for the medial compartment, respectively. Conclusion: Isolated DFO was inadequate to restore load distribution in meniscus-deficient knees, while concomitant LMAT restored near normal forces and improved the lateral compartment biomechanical profile. Clinical Relevance Our findings support the concomitant use of LMAT and varus-producing DFO in the setting of lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment. This study provides tools for the orthopaedic surgeon to individualize the correction for each patient.

Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy With Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair

Background: Valgus malalignment leads to excessive loading of the lateral compartment and has been associated with lateral compartment meniscal injuries and early-onset knee osteoarthritis. Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is a treatment option that allows correction of the mechanical access to offload the lateral compartment. Lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy and medial meniscal root repairs are both aimed to address the pathologic biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint and when successful can delay or even prevent progression to end-stage osteoarthritic changes in the lateral and medial compartment, respectively. Indications: Distal femoral osteotomy is indicated for patients with normal metabolic bone health and valgus malalignment who may present with concurrent lateral meniscal injury, symptomatic lateral compartment arthritis, or a chronic medial collateral ligament tear/laxity. Technique Description: Long-leg alignment radiographs and preoperative magnetic resonance images are required to evaluate the degree of mechanical access deviation and to evaluate for soft tissue injury, as there is often concomitant lateral meniscal or cartilage pathology present. This technique demonstrates the optimal order of surgical steps for DFO with a concurrent medial meniscal root repair. The senior author’s preferred order is to first perform the open lateral approach and expose the lateral cortex for the placement of plate prior to arthroscopic work and excess fluid extravasation. Intra-articular work is then performed with a diagnostic arthroscopy followed by medial meniscal root repair. Finally, the osteotomy and subsequent internal fixation are performed. Results: The literature on opening-wedge DFO outcomes is heterogeneous, with variable rates of successful outcomes and complications. Saithna et al reported that International Knee Documentation Committee and the pain subdomain of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores significantly improved postoperatively following lateral opening-wedge DFOs in patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis. The 10-year success rate of varus-producing DFO has been reported to be 64% to 85%. Discussion: We describe a technique for correction of a valgus deformity with opening-wedge DFO and concurrent meniscal root repair. This surgical technique effectively restores the native femoral and tibial axis with appropriate load distribution and also concurrently restores the appropriate function of the medial meniscus which allows axial force dispersion via hoop stresses for the medial compartment. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Functional and Radiographic Results of Arthroscopy-Assisted Lateral Open-Wedge Distal Femur Osteotomy for Lateral Compartment Osteoarthritis with Valgus Knee.

Treating lower extremity malalignment-related knee osteoarthritis, especially valgus alignment, is a challenge. A high revision rate was observed with patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, so distal femur osteotomy has regained its popularity. This research aimed to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes of arthroscopy-assisted lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomy (LOWDFO) for patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis and valgus knees with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Our study retrospectively included isolated lateral osteoarthritis (Outerbridge grade 3 and grade 4) of the knee related to valgus alignment and a young age (<65 y/o) with the demand for a high-impact activity event. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and functional outcomes were evaluated. Significant pre-operative and postoperative mechanical correction was observed with mechanical axis deviation (preop/postop: −28.77 ± 12.98/−9.45 ± 7.36, p < 0.001), hip-knee angle (preop/postop: 7.64 ± 3.62/2.68 ± 2.04, p < 0.001), and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA, preop/postop: 10.9 ± 4.14/5.66 ± 3.71, p < 0.001). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score also showed improvement after the operation (preop/postop: 57.36 ± 11.98/79.02 ± 4.58, p = 0.002). In conclusion, lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomy is effective in treating patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis and valgus knees with a low complication rate and excellent outcome.

Predictive Factors for Lateral Hinge Fracture in Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy

Background: Recent studies have reported that lateral hinge fracture (LHF) has a negative effect on bone healing at the osteotomy site after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO). However, limited evidence exists in the literature regarding the predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO. Hypothesis: A large medial closing gap and a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area would increase plain radiography–based and/or computed tomography (CT)–based LHF in MCDFO. Study Design: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 67 knees of 53 patients (mean age, 37.4 ± 16.9 years) who underwent MCDFO between May 2009 and June 2021. The surgical indications for MCDFO were genu valgum deformity combined with either lateral compartment osteoarthritis or recurrent patellar dislocation. The presence of LHF was evaluated based on immediate postoperative plain radiography and CT scans. The predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: LHFs were identified in 21 knees (31.3%) through plain radiography and in 40 knees (59.7%) through CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the medial closing gap and lateral hinge position were predictive factors for plain radiography– and CT-based LHF after MCDFO. Controlling for other variables, we found that an increase in the medial opening gap by 1 mm increased the likelihood of plain radiography–based LHF by a factor of 1.805 (95% CI, 1.291-2.525; P = .001) and CT-based LHF by 1.333 (95% CI, 1.003-1.772; P = .048). Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area increased the likelihood of plain radiography–based LHF by a factor of 9.870 (95% CI, 2.179-44.720; P = .003) and CT-based LHF by 5.686 (95% CI, 1.124-28.754; P = .036). Conclusion: A large medial closing gap and lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area are associated with LHF in MCDFO. Care should be taken to prevent LHF in MCDFO with a large medial closing gap. Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area should be avoided to decrease the incidence of LHF in MCDFO.

Poster 216: The Effects of Lateral Opening Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy on Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Objectives:Lateral meniscus deficiency with valgus malalignment increases the risk and rate of lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (LMAT) with concomitant varus-producing lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) is an available option to treat this pathology. No biomechanical data currently exists evaluating the effect on joint forces with these combined procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of LMAT with concomitant varus-producing LOWDFO on lateral and medial compartment biomechanics. We hypothesize that LMAT restores lateral compartment biomechanics back to native intact forces, varus-producing LOWDFO improves lateral compartment forces following LMAT, and medial compartment forces change to a lesser degree in response to mechanical varus.Methods:Ten human cadaveric knees underwent varus-producing LOWDFO and were placed in an external fixator. Anatomic alignment was standardized for each knee and utilized as a proxy for mechanical alignment. Thin film Tekscan pressure sensors were placed sub-meniscal and specimens were loaded on a biaxial dynamic testing machine to 800N within a custom designed apparatus, with loading angles between 9° valgus and 6° varus of mechanical alignment. Testing conditions included the intact meniscus, lateral meniscus deficiency, and LMAT. Statistical analysis was performed by creating two-factor random-intercepts linear mixed-effects models to compare peak pressure and contact area among the three experimental meniscus conditions.Results:Isolated varus-producing LOWDFO to 6° varus in the setting of meniscus deficiency was unable to restore joint forces to the level of the intact meniscus in neutral alignment (Mean Contact Pressure: 175%, Peak Pressure 135%, Contact Area -41%, P>0.05). LMAT restored mean contact and peak pressures, with no significant differences compared to the intact meniscus (P<0.05). LMAT resulted in significantly lower contact areas from 9° valgus to 0° (P>0.05), but this was restored to intact state at 3° and 6° varus (P<0.05). Within the lateral compartment following LMAT, every additional 1° of DFO correction contributes to a decreased in mean contact pressure of 5.6% (-0.0479 N/mm2)(Figure 1), a decrease in peak pressure of 5.9% (-0.154 N/mm2)(Figure 2), and a decrease in contact area of 1.4% (6.99 mm2)(Figure 3), as compared to forces in neutral alignment. Within the medial compartment following LMAT, every additional 1° of DFO correction contributes to an increase in mean contact pressure of 7.3% (+0.034 N/mm2), an increase in peak pressure of 12.6% (+0.160 N/mm2), and an increase in contact area of 4.3% (20.53 mm2), as compared to forces in neutral alignment. However, baseline forces in the medial compartment are significantly lower at baseline compared to lateral compartment forces (P>0.05).Conclusions:This is the first biomechanical study evaluating the effects of concomitant LMAT and varus-producing LOWDFO. Isolated varus-producing LOWDFO is inadequate to restore forces in the meniscus deficient knee. LMAT restores near normal forces, and concomitant LOWDFO improves the lateral compartment biomechanical profile. Although to a smaller magnitude, force changes in the medial compartment are significant with varus-producing LOWDFO. Unloading to 0° following LMAT may be ideal. Overall, this study provides tools to for the surgeon to individualize alignment correction for each patient to optimize outcomes.Figure 1.Mean Contact PressureFigure 2.Peak Contact PressureFigure 3.Contact Area

Isolated Lateral Tibiofemoral Compartment Osteoarthritis: Survivorship and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lateral Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at Mean 10-Year Follow-up.

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent option to alleviate disability and restore function in patients with lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship and long-term outcomes in both younger/middle-aged and older patients with lateral compartment OA following non-robotically-assisted, fixed-bearing lateral UKA and to determine if an acceptable symptom state can be achieved. All patients were managed with fixed-bearing lateral UKA by a single surgeon utilizing a lateral parapatellar approach without robotic assistance. The primary outcome variables were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscale scores. In addition, the other KOOS subscores, the Lysholm score, the achievement of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and the Veterans RAND (VR-12) Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and Mental Component Summary score (MCS) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: younger/middle-aged patients (<60 years of age) and older patients (≥60 years of age). A cohort of 256 patients underwent medial (n = 193) or lateral (n = 63) UKA. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. At mean of 10 years (range, 4 to 17 years) of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any patient-reported outcome measures (p > 0.05). The percentage of patients in whom PASS was achieved on the KOOS ADL and Sport subscores was 82% and 88%, respectively, in the younger cohort and 80% and 80%, respectively, in the older cohort. The mean survival estimate of the prothesis was 15.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 16.2 years) for the entire cohort. The estimated rate of implant survival in the younger cohort was 100% at 5 and 10 years, and the estimated rate of implant survival in the older cohort was 98% at 5 years and 96% at 10 years. Lateral fixed-bearing, non-robotic UKA for the treatment of isolated lateral compartment OA resulted in >80% of patients reaching an acceptable symptom state in terms of both activities of daily living and sporting activities. UKA provides an excellent option that provides longevity with high PASS rates and return to activities with a low risk of complications and failure. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Midterm Survivorship of Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a popular alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Few studies have investigated outcomes following robotic-assisted lateral UKA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-assisted lateral UKA. A retrospective case series was conducted on all robotic-assisted lateral UKAs performed by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2019. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and Kozinn and Scott criteria were collected. Implant survivorship was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with all-cause reoperation and conversion to TKA as endpoints. Participating patients were assessed for patient satisfaction and the Forgotten Joint Score-12. Correlations between patient demographics and patient outcome scores were investigated. In total, 120 lateral UKAs were identified, 84 of which met inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.0). Five-year survivorship was 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.5-96.7) with all-cause reoperation as the endpoint, and 100% (95% CI 95.0-100) with conversion to TKA as the endpoint. One patient was converted to TKA after the 5-year mark, resulting in a 6-year survival for conversion to TKA of 88.9% (95% CI 44.9-98.5). Average Forgotten Joint Score-12 score was 82.7/100, and patient satisfaction 4.7/5. Mean coronal plane correction was 2.5° ± 1.9° toward the mechanical axis. Neither final postoperative alignment nor failure to meet classic Kozinn and Scott criteria for UKA resulted in differences in patient-reported outcomes. The current study demonstrates high mid-term survivorship and excellent patient-reported outcomes with robotic-assisted lateral UKA. Robotic-assisted lateral UKA is a viable treatment option for isolated lateral compartment arthritis even in patients who do not meet classic indications.

Paper 18: Treatment of Lateral Meniscus Tears Influences OA Rate following ACL Reconstruction at 9-year Follow-Up

Objectives:Recent studies have described an increased risk of osteoarthritis (OA) following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Systematic reviews have suggested that meniscal pathology, which occurs in up to 60% of patients with ACL injury, increases this risk. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of lateral meniscus tears and repair versus partial lateral meniscectomy on the risk of OA in patients following ACLR.Methods:All patients who underwent primary autograft or allograft bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) transtibial ACLR by a single surgeon between 1999-2019, were identified. Revision ACLR, multi-ligamentous reconstructions, and patients with less than 2-year imaging follow-up were excluded. Patients with lateral meniscus pathology at the time of ACLR were identified and treatment (e.g. lateral meniscectomy or lateral meniscus tear) was extracted. OA was defined at follow-up as Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade III-IV on plain radiographs. Chi-square tests assessed differences in incidence rates (p<0.05).Results:A consecutive series of 113 patients (57 males, 56 females; age 35.7±11.9 years) with BPTB ACLR were included. The mean follow-up was 9±5 years. The prevalence of lateral meniscus tears was 60.2% (68/113) and the prevalence of lateral compartment OA at follow-up was 14% (16/113) Patients with a lateral meniscus tear were 4.7 times more likely to develop OA compared to patients with no lateral meniscus tear. 20.6% of patients (14/68) with lateral meniscus tear developed lateral OA compared to 4.4% of patients (2/45) without lateral meniscus tear (p=0.0158). Patients who underwent lateral meniscal repair (n=16) had significantly lower prevalence of OA (0/16) compared to patients who underwent lateral meniscectomy (14/52) (p=0.0196).Conclusions:At nine-year follow-up, patients with a lateral meniscus tear at time of ACLR were more likely to develop OA compared to patients with no lateral meniscus tear and patients treated with partial meniscectomy had higher prevalence of OA compared to those treated with meniscus repair. In patients who require ACLR, care should be taken in evaluating and treating the lateral meniscus to decrease the likelihood of the development of OA. We believe lateral meniscal repair is essential for lateral meniscus tears at the time ACL reconstruction to help avoid development of OA.Figure 1.

Combined lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: risk of osteoarthritis.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure, combined with an intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), is used to reduce rotational laxity and the risk of graft failure. However, concern of overtightening of the lateral compartment and subsequent osteoarthritis remains. The aim of this study is to evaluate the degenerative changes in the lateral compartment and to compare the clinical and radiographical results between two LET techniques. Eighty-three patients (86knees) were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 67.7months (range 49-85months). Forty-two knees had an ACL reconstruction combined with a LET procedure according to the modified Lemaire technique and 44 knees according to the modified Coker-Arnold technique. IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores were used. Osteoarthritis was radiographically evaluated by the Kellgren-Lawrence classification. There were 12 patients (28.6%) in the modified Lemaire subgroup and 13 patients (29.5%) in the modified Coker-Arnold subgroup that had doubtful or mild radiologic signs of osteoarthritis. No patients had moderate or severe signs at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in radiological signs of osteoarthritis. In the modified Lemaire subgroup, we report a mean IKDC of 86.31 (± 13.794), a mean Lysholm of 87.83 (± 12.802) and a mean Tegner of 5.38 (± 2.556). In the modified Coker-Arnold subgroup, a mean IKDC of 87.27 (± 11.653), a mean Lysholm of 91.89 (± 8.035) and a mean Tegner of 5.16 (± 2.420) were reported. There were no statistical significant differences between both techniques. In eight patients, a complication was identified, 3 of which had a failure of the ACL reconstruction. The chosen LET-technique seems to have minimal effect on both the clinical and the radiographic results. The LET is a safe procedure, and it does not increase the risk of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment.