Lateral Collateral Ligament Complex Research Articles

Fascia lata allograft – a suitable alternative in ligamentous reconstruction for chronic elbow instability?

BackgroundUp to now there is no gold standard concerning the optimal graft choice in the surgical therapy of chronic elbow instability. As donor site morbidity represents a rare (1-4%) but severe complication of graft harvest, using an allograft seems favorable. Fascia lata mimics the anatomy through its fan shaped configuration of the ligamentous complex of the elbow joint, making it questionable for use as a graft. The aims of the study are a) to evaluate the biomechanical suitability of fascia lata allograft and b) compare clinical and radiological outcome between ligament reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LUCL) using either FibreTape augmented triceps autograft or FibreTape augmented fascia lata allograft. MethodsBiomechanical testing of fascia lata was performed using a 10 kN uniaxial test system with a 1 kN load cell. The retrospective cohort study evaluated all patients who received a ligament reconstruction of the elbow due to chronic instability with allogenic fascia lata or autologous triceps tendon. Exclusion criteria were any type of coexisting fracture or nerval injury. Demographic parameters, patient reported outcome parameters (PROMs) and radiological stability parameters (sonography, fluoroscopy) were evaluated. ResultsTensile testing of 39 fascia lata allografts revealed an ultimate load of 234.8±23.1 N and ultimate strength of 33.4±4.4 MPa. 21 patients were included in the clinical substudy (57.1% men, 42.9% women , age 41.0 ± 12.2 years, BMI 24.9 ± 4.1 kg/m2) with average follow-up of 21.6 ± 17.1 months. No significant differences were found concerning pain level, PROMs or Range of Motion (ROM), between fascia lata and triceps group. There was also no difference concerning sonographic stability of LUCL between the 2 groups (p=0.14). One revision occurred in fascia lata allograft group, 2 in triceps autograft group due to graft elongation. ConclusionCurrently, there is no clinical evidence demonstrating the superiority of either autograft or allograft tissue. Due to its demonstration of sufficient biomechanical properties fascia lata allograft seems an appropriate treatment option for ligamentous reconstruction of chronic elbow instability.

Posterior Translation of the Radial Head in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lateral Epicondylitis.

Posterolateral rotatory instability is produced by disruption of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC); it is commonly induced by trauma, with few cases reported due to lateral epicondylitis. We examined the amount of posterior transition of the radial head with or without LCLC injury, common extensor tendon (CET) injury, and Baker classification in lateral epicondylitis. We retrospectively studied patients with lateral epicondylitis of the humerus who underwent surgery between April 2016 and July 2021. Fifteen elbows with coronal and sagittal images on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. We investigated the amount of posterior transition of the radial head in sagittal MRI images of the elbow, which were compared based on LCLC and CET lesion. The mean age of patients was 49 years. The lesions in four, nine, and two patients were classified as LCLC0, LCLC1, and LCLC2, respectively. The mean radio-humeral distance values among the LCLC lesions were 0.65, 2.46, and 2.22 mm in LCLC0, LCLC1, and LCLC2, respectively, with the RHD between LCLC0 and LCLC1 differing significantly. In five, six, and four patients, the lesions were classified as CET1, CET2, and CET3, respectively. The mean RHD values among the CET lesions were 1.33, 2.68, and 1.48 mm in CET1, CET2, and CET3, respectively. Our results showed that posterior transition of the radial head is greater in patients with lateral epicondylitis with LCLC lesions on MRI than those with normal findings of LCLC.

Arthroscopic assessment for lateral collateral ligament complex deficiency of the elbow: a cadaveric study.

To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy. Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (UHJ) gap (mm) were measured with different sizes of probes from the posterolateral viewing portal. The elbow was 90 degrees flexed with neutral forearm rotation for RCJ gap measurement and 30 degrees flexed with full supination for UHJ gap measurement. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0: intact; Stage 1: the release of the anterior 1/3 LCL complex; Stage 2: the release of the anterior two thirds of the LCL complex; and Stage 3: the release of the entire LCL complex) on each specimen. The mean gap of RCJ and lateral UHJ was used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow. The mean RCJ gap distance in Stage 2 and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .008; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .010). The mean UHJ gap distance of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 1: P = 0.025; Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .010; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .011). In contrast, the release of the anterior 1/3 of the LCL complex (Stage 1) was not significantly increased compared to the mean joint gap distance of RCJ (P = .157). Arthroscopic measurement of joint gap widening in RCJ and UHJ is a reliable assessment method to detect LCL complex deficiency that involves the anterior two thirds or more.

The Boyd approach: a valuable alternative to treating simple to complex elbow fractures and dislocations.

The Boyd approach is a single-incision posterior approach to the proximal radius and ulna based on a lateral anconeus muscle reflection and release of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex. This approach remains a lesser-used technique following early reports of proximal radioulnar synostosis and postoperative elbow instability. Although limited by small case series, recent literature does not support these early reported complications. This study presents a single surgeon's outcomes using the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all patients with simple to complex elbow injuries treated consecutively using a Boyd approach by a shoulder and elbow surgeon was conducted from 2016 to 2020. All patients with at least 1 postoperative clinic visit were included. Data collected included patient demographics, injury description, postoperative complications, elbow range of motion, and radiographic findings including heterotopic ossification and proximal radioulnar synostosis. Categorical and continuous variables were reported using descriptive statistics. A total of 44 patients were included with an average age of 49 years (range 13-82 years). The most commonly treated injuries were Monteggia fracture-dislocations (32%) and terrible triad injuries (18%). Average follow-up was 8 months (range 1-24 months). Final average elbow active arc of motion was from 20° (range 0°-70°) of extension to 124° (range 75°-150°) of flexion. Final supination and pronation were 53° (range 0°-80°) and 66° (range 0°-90°), respectively. There were no cases of proximal radioulnar synostosis. Heterotopic ossification contributing to less than functional elbow range of motion occurred in 2 (5%) patients who elected conservative management. There was 1 (2%) case of early postoperative posterolateral instability due to repair failure of injured ligaments that required revision using a ligament augmentation procedure. Five (11%) patients experienced postoperative neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with ulnar neuropathy. Of these, 1 underwent ulnar nerve transposition, 2 were improving, and 1 had persistent symptoms at final follow-up. This is the largest case series available demonstrating the safe utilization of the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Postoperative complications including synostosis and elbow instability may not be as common as previously understood.

The Relationship between the Bevel of the Radial Head Epiphysis and the Posterior Synovial Fringe During Rotation of the Elbow: An Ultrasonography Study with Possible Implications Regarding the Pathophysiology of Nursemaid's Elbow.

Nursemaid's elbow is the most common upper extremity injury in children under 5 years of age. However, the exact pathomechanism underlying the nursemaid's elbow remains elusive, and approximate one-third of patients present with a nonclassical history. Using a high-frequency ultrasound probe, we attempted to determine the relationship between the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe and the peripheral rim of the radial head epiphysis during rotation. It is possible that the primary reason for the nursemaid's elbow is due to the pronator position. Twenty-one patients had a history of nursemaid's elbow and had a successful reduction before enrollment in this study. A high-frequency linear array 6 to 24 MHz hockey stick transducer was used to detect small morphologic changes in the peripheral rim of the radial head epiphysis and the posterior synovial fringe during rotation of the capitellum-radial joint. In complete pronation, the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe contacts the beveled articular surface of the radial head peripheral rim in all 21 patients. In neutral and complete supination, the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe contacts the convexly nonarticular surface of the radial head peripheral rim and extends deep into the foveal radius. The posterior synovial fringe and the capsule-aponeurotic membrane were tightened in passive pronation in all 21 cases. The posterior synovial fringe and the capsule-aponeurosis membrane were all loose in the neutral and supination positions. The anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe touches the beveled peripheral rim of the radial head epiphysis during complete pronation, and the tension of the lateral collateral ligament complex during pronation may further cause unstable conditions of the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe. We hypothesized that the beveled peripheral rim of the radial epiphysis and its relationship with the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe could be the reason why nursemaid's elbow only occurs while the elbow is in the pronator position.

Mid-term results of the treatment of acute postero-lateral rotational instability of the elbow joint

Background: Dislocations of the forearm are rare injuries with the annual incidence of 6.1 cases per 100 000 population. Postero-lateral rotational instability is the most common complication after the conservative treatment of forearm dislocations. To restore the congruency and provide early movements in the elbow joint, the primary repair or reconstruction of the damaged ligaments of the elbow are required. Aim: to evaluate the clinical and functional results after the surgical repair of the elbow joint ligaments in acute postero-lateral rotational instability. Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of a series of clinical cases, including 17 patients with acute postero-lateral rotational instability, among them 5 simple forearm dislocations, 9 fracture-dislocations of the forearm and 3 fractures of the radial head. Refixation of the lateral ulnar ligament was performed with anchor fixation or bone tunnels. The evaluation was performed using the clinical aspects (the lateral pivot shift test, the range of motion), according to the scale for the evaluation of the elbow joint functional condition (MEPS), Oxford scale of the elbow joint evaluation (OEC), the X-ray results were also estimated. Results: In all the cases the elbow joint stability had been achieved, according to the X-ray and clinical aspects. In 4 cases, additional plasty of the medial collateral ligament was needed and performed after the restoration of the lateral ligament complex. According to the MEPS scale, 58% of the achieved results were excellent, 35% were good and 5.8% were satisfactory. Conclusion: The restoration of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament complex is a safe and effective procedure, which restores the elbow joint stability and allows the patients to return to full physical activity and avoid the development of postero-lateral rotational joint instability.

Biomechanical evaluation of the anterior talo-fibular and calcaneo-fibular ligaments using shear wave elastography in young healthy adults

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the stiffness of the anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneo-fibular ligament (CFL) using shear wave elastography (SWE) with the ankle in the neutral position and in varus, in young healthy adult volunteers. We also evaluated the reliability and reproducibility of the SWE measurements. HypothesisThe stiffness of both ligaments increases with increasing ankle varus. SWE may be a reliable tool for evaluating the lateral collateral ligament complex of the ankle. Material and methodsWe used SWE to evaluate both ankles of each of 20 healthy volunteers (10 females and 10 males). For each test, the foot was placed on a hinged plate and tested in the neutral position and in 15° and 30° of varus. Stiffness was evaluated based on shear wave velocity (SWV). ResultsStiffness of both the ATFL and CFL was minimal in the neutral position (2.06m/s and 3.43m/s, respectively). Stiffness increased significantly for both ligaments in 15° of varus (2.48m/s and 4.11m/s, respectively; p<0.0001) and was greatest in 30° of varus (3.15m/s and 4.57m/s, respectively; p<0.0001). ATFL stiffness was greater in males than in females in 15° (p=0.04) and 30° (p=0.02) of varus. For the CFL, in contrast, stiffness was not different between males and females. Stiffness of the ATFL and CFL was not associated with age, dominant side, height, or foot morphology. No correlations were found between stiffness of the two ligaments in any of the positions. Repeating each measurement three times produced excellent concordance for both ligaments in all three positions. ConclusionThe ATFL and CFL are the main lateral stabilisers of the ankle, and each exerts a specific function. Their stiffness increases with the degree of varus. This study describes a protocol for evaluating ATFL and CFL density by SWE, which is a reliable and reproducible technique that provides a normal range. Level of evidenceIV.

Efficacy of Ultrasonic Tenotomy and Debridement and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

To determine the efficacy of treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and ultrasonic tenotomy and debridement (USTD) as well as risk factors for treatment failure. This was a retrospective study including patients treated for LET with PRP or USTD between January 2018 and December 2021. The efficacy of both procedures was assessed using pain-related patient-reported outcome measures at the 12-week follow-up. Baseline subject characteristics and diagnostic ultrasound findings were analyzed as risk factors for failure of treatment. Failure was classified as a surgical indication for LET within a year of the PRP or USTD. Ultrasonic tenotomy and debridement and PRP both led to significant improvement in patient pain within the 12-week follow-up period. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two procedures. Common extensor tendon tearing on ultrasound and Worker's Compensation cases were found to be risk factors for failure of USTD. Lateral collateral ligament complex involvement and injection were found to be risk factors for failure of PRP. Platelet-rich plasma and USTD are both effective interventions for LET. They have separate risk factors for failure that should be taken in consideration while deciding the treatment approach. These procedures are minimally invasive alternatives to some of the more invasive surgical options to treat LET. Therapeutic III.

Posterolateral stabilization of the elbow by autologous ligament reconstruction to limit long-term development of osteoarthritis.

Posterolateral instability is the most frequent form of both acute and chronic elbow instability. Joint incongruity due to posterolateral unlocking leads to shear and compression stress of the internal aspect of the humeroulnar joint. We carried out long-term analysis of patients with posterolateral elbow instability in order to determine whether, in addition to improving their symptoms, reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex may play a protective role against the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll stabilizes the elbow and also limits the development of osteoarthritis in the long term. Patients with symptomatic posterolateral instability of the elbow and who underwent ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll from January 1995 to December 2010 were identified and retrospectively included for 2 follow-up evaluations at a mean of 5 and 14years. Fourteen elbows in 14 patients were included. All had a negative lateral pivot shift test and none reported a new episode of instability. Two patients (14%) had osteoarthritis. The 2 radiographic evaluations showed no progression of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis developed in 33% of patients with intra-articular fracture. In simple dislocations, pre-existing osteoarthritic lesions were stabilized and there were no new cases of osteoarthritis. Elbow ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll gives effective posterolateral stabilization and appears to protect against progression to osteoarthritic degeneration in the long term. In the absence of associated lesions, it prevents the development of osteoarthritis or the worsening of pre-existing osteoarthritis.

Arthroscopic Modified Elbow Lateral Collateral Ligament Imbrication: An Operative Technique

When the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex fails to support the radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral joints in advanced stages of insufficiency, the patient experiences posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Open lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair with a ligamentous graft has been the standard treatment for PLRI. Despite producing good clinical stability rates, this method is associated with significant lateral soft-tissue dissection and a lengthy recovery period. By fastening the LCL to its humeral insertion, arthroscopic imbrication of the LCL can increase stability. The senior author modified this technique. With the aid of a passer, the LCL complex, lateral capsule, and anconeus may be weaved with a single (doubled) suture, secured with a Nice knot. LCL complex imbrication may be used to restore stability and improve pain and function in patients with grade I and II PLRI.

The AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of the Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Examination.

The AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of the Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Examination.

Trans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation: a novel type of elbow injury

BackgroundBased on our experiences, we found that a kind of elbow injury is characterized by an olecranon fracture accompanied by elbow joint posterior dislocation with the proximal radioulnar joint intact. The aim of this study was to better define this kind of severe elbow instability, which has not been previously reported.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients with olecranon fractures who were treated at our institution from January 2013 to April 2021. Data on these patient demographics, injury characteristics, preoperative and postoperative imaging, surgical management, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. We also made the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria.ResultsA total of 309 patients were diagnosed olecranon fractures in our institution, and ten patients met the inclusion criteria, 9 males and 1 female, with an average age of 40.6 ± 12.7 years (26–68 years). Eight patients (80%) were comminuted, and two were oblique olecranon fracture. Nine patients (90%) suffered coronoid process fractures, eight fractures were type III, and one was type II. Eight patients (80%) suffered radial head fractures, seven fractures were type II, and one was type III. All patients suffered lateral collateral ligament complex injury. All patients underwent surgical management and were followed up on average for 15.8 ± 3.2 months (12–20 months). The motion of the elbow and functional outcome were evaluated with several methods. The mean arc of the elbow movement was 131.6° ± 6.0° (124°–140°), and the mean arc of the forearm rotation was 158.5° ± 17.8° (128°–180°). Nine patients’ functional results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were excellent with a mean score of 96.5 ± 5.3 points (85–100 points), and another was good. The mean score according to the Broberg and Morrey functional rating index was 98.8 ± 2.5 points (92–100 points), nine patients were excellent, and another was good. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score was 0.75 ± 1.2 points (0–3.3 points).ConclusionsTrans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation is a rare injury and has unique characteristics, and it is a kind of complex elbow instability involving the coronoid process and radial head fractures. After bony structure is restored, the repairment of lateral collateral ligament complex is also important to the stability of the elbow joint. Correct understanding of this kind of injury and reasonable treatment plan can achieve good function.

Closed Reduction Technique for Severely Displaced Radial Neck Fractures in Children.

The described technique is useful for achieving closed reduction of severely displaced (i.e., Judet Type-III and IV) pediatric radial neck fractures. It is widely agreed that radial neck fractures with angulation of >30° should be reduced. Various maneuvers have been described, but none uniformly achieves complete reduction in severely displaced radial neck fractures (Types III and IV)1-4. The aim of the present technique is to achieve closed reduction in these severely displaced radial neck fractures without surgical instrumentation. A stepwise approach is described. First, the radial head is viewed in profile under an image intensifier so that it appears rectangular. Varus stress is applied at the medial aspect of the elbow by the assistant, and thumb pressure is applied at the radial head along the posterolateral aspect of the elbow. This results in partial reduction of the radial head. The elbow is then simultaneously flexed and pronated with continuous pressure over the radial head. This final step anatomically reduces the radial head, and hyperpronating the forearm locks it in the corrected position. Operative alternatives to this technique include intra-focal pin-assisted reduction to achieve closed reduction, the Métaizeau technique of achieving indirect closed reduction of the fracture with the aid of a TENS (Titanium Elastic Nailing System) nail, and open reduction5. Nonoperative techniques have also been described for use with Judet Type-II and III fractures, but not with the severely displaced types described in the present article. This technique takes into consideration the anatomy of the capsule and lateral collateral ligament complex. The biomechanical ligamentotaxis helps in achieving anatomic reduction of the radial head. Placing the forearm in pronation tightens the annular and lateral collateral ligaments and prevents redisplacement. There are potential complications with operative treatment, including the risk of nerve injury with percutaneous reduction techniques and the risks of osteonecrosis, premature epiphyseal fusion, and heterotopic ossification with open reduction. These complications can be avoided by the use of the presently described technique. This technique provided satisfactory clinical outcomes in our previous study6, with none of the 10 patients showing signs of growth disturbance, loss of reduction, or reported complications at 12 months. Terminal restriction of supination was observed in 1 patient. No patient had osteonecrosis or elbow deformity. No patient required conversion to an implant-assisted or open reduction procedure. The steps need to be followed sequentially as described in order to achieve an anatomical reduction.After achieving the reduction, it is necessary to keep the forearm in pronation to maintain the reduction with the aid of the lateral ligament complex.This technique may not work in complex fractures with elbow dislocation because of the lack of ligamentous integrity.In the final step, the elbow is pronated and flexed simultaneously, with sustained pressure over the radial head in order to obtain further correction. This is the most critical step of the technique because anatomic reduction of the partially reduced fracture is achieved at this time. Percut. = percutaneousAP = anteroposteriorCR = closed reductionORIF = open reduction and internal fixation.

The Role of the Lateral Collateral Ligament-Capsule Complex (LCL-cc) of the Elbow Under Gravity Varus.

The lateral collateral ligament complex along with the capsule is likely to be at risk during arthroscopic ECRB release in lateral epicondylitis. We hypothesized that disruption of the lateral collateral ligament-capsule complex (LCL-cc) increases the mean contact pressure on the coronoid under the gravity varus. Eight cadaveric elbows were tested under the gravity varus and weighted varus stress tests (2Nm), using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads while allowing passive flexion of the elbow. Mean articular surface contact pressure data were collected and processed using intra-articular thin film sensors and software. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0: Intact; Stage 1: release of anterior 1/3 LCL-cc; Stage 2; release of anterior 2/3 LCL-cc; and Stage 3; release of entire LCL-cc) on each specimen. The mean contact pressure of the coronoid and mean M/L ratio (ratio of contact pressure on medial coronoid to that on the lateral coronoid) were used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow. The overall mean contact pressure significantly increased in Stage 2 (P =.0006 in gravity varus, P =.0002 in weighted varus) and Stage 3 (P <.0001 in gravity varus, P <.0001 in weighted varus) compared to that in Stage 0. In contrast, release of the anterior 1/3 of LCL-cc (Stage 1) did not significantly increase the mean contact pressure on the coronoid in any degree of flexion under gravity varus (P =.06) or weighted varus loading (P =.6). The M/L ratio difference between Stage 0 and Stage 1 was 1.1 ± 1.1 under gravity varus (P =.8) and 2.1 ± 0.9 under weighted varus. (P =.2) The overall M/L ratio in Stage 2 and Stage 3 were significantly higher compared to that seen in Stage 0 under gravity varus (P =.04 in Stage 2, P =.02 in Stage 3) or weighted varus (P =.006 in Stage 2, P <.0001 in Stage 3). Loss of the anterior 2/3 or more of the LCL-cc significantly increases the overall mean contact pressure of coronoid, especially in the medial coronoid under both gravity varus and weighted varus. The LCL-cc also plays a role in the distribution of coronoid contact pressure against gravity varus loads.

Bracing with Tape and Extensor Refixation of Elbow with Posterolateral Instability Due to Cubitus Varus: A Case Report.

A 54-year-old patient had lateral ligament insufficiency due to cubitus varus from a childhood supracondylar fracture. Arthrolysis/synovectomy and at a later stage double-row extensor origin refixation and lateral ulnar collateral ligament bracing with nonabsorbent tape and anchors were performed. Follow-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months showed excellent Mayo Elbow Performance and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Scores (24-month follow-up = 100 and 2.5, respectively). Suture tape augmentation and double-row extensor refixation in cases of lateral collateral ligament complex insufficiency due to cubitus varus may provide improved short-term functional outcomes, from the third postoperative month.

Arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication of the elbow: short-term clinical results.

Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow results from an insufficient lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex. Arthroscopic LCL imbrication may prove a minimally invasive alternative to open lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction with a quicker rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the validity of a modified arthroscopic imbrication technique. We hypothesized that arthroscopic LUCL imbrication would yield stable elbows in patients with grade 1 or 2 chronic PLRI at a minimum of 2 year of follow-up. We retrospectively assessed data of all PLRI patients who underwent arthroscopic LUCL imbrication from 2010 to 2013 (n=20). Stage 3 PLRIs (frank ulnohumeral dislocations) were excluded from this treatment. After confirmation of PLRI during standard elbow arthroscopy, a doubled absorbable suture is shuttled through as much LCL tissue as possible (from the lateral ulnar border to the area proximal to the lateral epicondyle) and the sutures are tied. This results in a plication of the entire LCL complex. Objective elbow stability was assessed using a combination of the pivot shift, table top, and posterior drawer tests. Of 20 included patients, 18 were stable subjectively and objectively at a minimum of 2 year of follow-up. Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 48 preoperatively to 88.9 at final follow-up (P<.001). Mean Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 53 preoperatively to 10.3 at final follow-up (P<.001). One patient developed elbow stiffness. Two patients reported tenderness of the subcutaneous PDS knots. As a less invasive alternative to open LCL reconstruction using a graft, arthroscopic LCL imbrication has demonstrated acceptable rates of perceived elbow stability among patients with stage 1 or 2 PLRI.

Correlations of magnetic resonance imaging classifications with preoperative functions among patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis

BackgroundTo evaluate the correlations between three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classifications and preoperative function in patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis (LE).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with refractory LE who underwent arthroscopic treatment. Signal changes in the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ERCB) were evaluated based on three different MRI classification systems. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to analyse the correlation between each MRI classification and the preoperative functional and visual analogue scale (VAS). The lateral collateral ligament complex (LCL) in all patients was evaluated using both MRI and arthroscopy. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the comparison of preoperative VAS and all functional scores between patients with refractory LE combined with LCL lesions, and those without.ResultsThere were 51 patients diagnosed with refractory LE between June 2014 to December 2020, all of whom were included in this study. The patients included 32 women and 19 men with a mean age of 49.1 ± 7.6 years (range, 39–60 years). The average duration of symptoms was 21.1 ± 21.2 months (range, 6–120 months). The intra-observer agreements for Steinborn et al.’s classification were 77.9%, 76.0%, and 76.7%, respectively. The inter-observer reliabilities of the three classifications were 0.734, 0.751, and 0.726, respectively. The average intra-observer agreement for the diagnosis of abnormal LCL signal was 89.9%, with an overall weighted kappa value of 0.904. The false-positive rate was 50%, and the false-negative rate was 48% for LCL evaluation on MRI. Spearman's rank correlation analysis did not find significant correlation between any of the three MRI classifications and preoperative VAS or any functional scores (all P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the VAS and functional scores between patients with abnormal LCL signals on MRI and those without LCL lesions (all P > 0.05).ConclusionsPreoperative MRI findings in patients with refractory LE cannot reflect the severity of functional deficiency. Preoperative MRI grading of the origin of the ERCB and preoperative MRI for LCL signal change cannot assist the surgical plan for the treatment of patients with refractory LE.

The lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow in a Thai population: an anatomical study of 56 cadaveric specimens.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical features of the lateral collateral complex (LCC) of the elbow in a Thai population. We dissected 56 cadaveric elbows and described the LCC three-dimensionally in sagittal and coronal planes. We found that the characteristics differed from previous reports in other ethnic populations. In the sagittal plane, the centre of the origin of the LCC was located 3 mm anteriorly and 4 mm inferiorly to the apex of the lateral humerus epicondyle, and in the coronal plane it was 4 mm deep. The vertical distance between the origin of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and the lateral epicondyle and the distance from the LUCL insertion to the border of the ulnar bone differed significantly between sexes. These data may be useful for surgeons during reconstruction of injures to the LCC of the elbow.Level of evidence: V.

Anatomic Repair of a Lateral Collateral Ligament and Anterolateral Capsular Complex Injury With Internal Brace Augmentation

Background: Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries are implicated in varus instability of the knee. Often, these accompany other ligamentous injuries including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears, and injury to the anterolateral capsular complex (ALCC). Use of internal brace augmentation with anatomic repair is an alternative to reconstruction to improve patient outcomes and facilitate early range of motion and weight bearing. Indications: We present a case of an anatomic repair of a LCL and an ALCC injury with internal brace augmentation. Technique Description: A curvilinear incision centered over the lateral epicondyle is used. The avulsed LCL and biceps tendon was exposed and a placed #5 FiberWire was placed into the distal LCL, biceps tendon, and the popliteofibular ligament. A split was made in the iliotibial (IT) band and a second #5 FiberWire was placed proximally in the LCL/biceps tendon for additional fixation. A tunnel was made in the fibular head and tibia using a 2.4-mm beath pin and the two #5 FiberWires were passed to the anteromedial tibia. The FiberWires were fixed to the tibia using a 14-mm attachable button system (ABS) manhole cover for suspensory fixation. Repair and internal bracing of the anterolateral capsular complex was accomplished with 2 interlocked TightRopes and a #2 FiberTape. This fixation method achieved repair by compressing the anterolateral capsular complex onto its tibial origin. The suture devices also served to augment the repair and were fixed proximally to the femur using another 14-mm ABS manhole cover. The FiberTape was fixed to the anterolateral tibia distally with a 4.5 mm SwiveLock. The TightRopes were passed through a tunnel to the anterolateral tibia and secured using an ABS Dog Bone. The construct was tensioned in near full extension and gapping was matched fluoroscopically to the contralateral knee. Results: Patient was cleared for full return to sports 9 months postoperatively. At the final follow up visit, the patient had excellent strength, stability, and 135° range of motion on the operative knee. Patient had returned to exercise at home but was unable to return to sports due to COVID-19 restrictions. Conclusion: Anatomic repair of the LCL and the ALCC with internal brace augmentation can serve as an effective alternative to reconstruction and demonstrates excellent patient outcomes regarding restoring stability, ROM, and return to preoperative sports.

Terrible triad injury of the elbow: a historical perspective.

The aims of this study are to summarize (1) the history of terrible triad injury (TTi) treatment and (2) the clinical and biomechanical data that engendered its evolution. A literature search was performed using fiveelectronic databases. Results were discussed as a chronologic review of the relevant literature between 1920 and 2022. In 1962, Osborne was the first to describe a link between elbow dislocation, radial head fracture, and lateral collateral ligament complex injury via a novel mechanism: posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Given that untreated elbow instability leads to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), there has been increasing interest in elbow biomechanics since the 1980s. Data from studies in that period revolutionized the approach to elbow instability. The authors demonstrated that TTi could occur via a PLRI mechanism with a disruption of the lateral collateral ulnar ligament and a functionally competent anterior medial collateral ligament (aMCL). Since the 1990s, due to the difficulty in identifying its pathoanatomic features, some began to speculate about a sequence of injuries and mechanisms leading to TTi. However, the clinical literature has largely been unable to reproduce in vitro findings describing the pathomechanics of TTi. Some aspects of treatment remain controversial including systematic coronoid and aMCL repair. Despite a growing body of biomechanics data, there is no widely accepted surgical protocol for the treatment of TTi. Functional outcomes among patients have greatly improved. Better diagnosis and treatment of infra-clinical instability after a TTi may be an important stepping stone to prevent the onset of moderate/severe PTOA.