Late Tracheostomy Group Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Early vs. Late Tracheostomy in Ventilated COVID-19 Patients.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic prompted a significant use of intensive care resources for managing hypoxic respiratory failure. A substantial portion of these patients required mechanical ventilation. While intubation is common, its impact on mortality improvement has been questionable. Tracheostomies have become crucial for patients needing prolonged ventilation. However, tracheostomies also risk infections, ranging from early-stage mild cellulitis to later-stage nosocomial pneumonia. Our study evaluates the incidence of bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy early (within 14 days) versus late (more than 14 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation) during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center study at Royal Medical Services Military Hospital. The study included COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy and were admitted to the ICU from March 2020 to March 2022. We analyzed the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the timing of weaning from mechanical ventilation, and outcomes between early and late tracheostomized patients. Analyzed variables included demographics, comorbidities, use of steroids, tocilizumab, inflammation parameters, tracheostomy timing, incidence of bacterial infections, complications, and outcomes. Results The study comprised 36 patients. We found no statistically significant difference in the incidence of bacterial infections between the early and late tracheostomy groups (P>0.05). Complications and overall outcomes did not show significant statistical associations. Inotropes use was more frequent in the late tracheostomy group (P=0.122). In contrast, continuous renal replacement therapy was higher in the early tracheostomy group, showing no significant association (P>0.05). Mortality was higher in the early tracheostomy group, with nine deaths compared to seven in the late tracheostomy group. Interestingly, infection with Acinetobacter baumannii was associated with a statistically significant lower mortality rate, with 75% survival following tracheostomy. Conclusions Findings suggest that tracheostomy timing does not significantly impact the incidence of bacterial pneumonia or other complications, such as the use of inotropes, continuous renal replacement therapy, or mortality rates. These results support the use of personalized decision-making while conducting tracheostomies. Further research is necessary to determine the impacts of tracheostomy timing on patient outcomes more definitively.

Comparison Between Early and Late Tracheostomy in ICU Patients Including COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background Tracheostomy is a common intervention for intensive care unit (ICU) patients for various reasons. The superiority of early versus late tracheostomy is still unfounded for non-COVID-19 cases. The COVID-19 pandemic complicated the matter, as little literature was available on the ideal timing of tracheostomy for patients with COVID-19. Research question This study aimed to establish the superiority of early or late tracheostomy for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases by comparing outcomes, including ICU mortality, ventilation days after tracheostomy, and ICU length of stay (LOS). Study design and methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on ventilated ICU patients both with and without COVID-19 at a university hospital between January 2020 and December 2021. During the study period, 1,393 ventilated patients were scanned, and 156 were found to be tracheostomized. Tracheostomy was considered to be early when performed within 10 days of intubation, after which it was considered to be late. Results Tracheostomy was performed early for 84/156 (53.8%) of tracheostomized patients and late for 72/156 (46.2%) of patients. The overall mortality was 42.9% (36/84) versus 69.4% (50/72) (P=0.001, OR=3.03, 95% CI=1.563-5.874), 31.4% versus 65.5% in the non-COVID-19 group and 60.6% versus 72.1% (P=0.005, OR=2.640, 95% CI=1.345-5.181) in the COVID-19 group for the early and late tracheostomy groups, respectively. Ventilation days were higher for the late tracheostomy group than for the early tracheostomy group in the non-COVID-19 group (17.10 versus 9.18 days, P<0.001). However, it was almost the same for the early and late tracheostomy groups in the COVID-19 group (14.15 versus 13.86 days,P=0.821). The ICU LOS was greater for the late tracheostomy group for both the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that ICU mortality is significantly associated with age, ventilation days, and ICU LOS. Interpretation The results of this study indicate that early tracheostomy was associated with lower mortality, fewer ventilation days, and shorter LOS in both the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups.

Establishment and validation of a predictive model for tracheotomy in critically ill patients and analysis of the impact of different tracheotomy timing on patient prognosis

BackgroundIn critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), it is unable to determine early which patients require tracheotomy and whether early tracheotomy is beneficial.MethodsClinical data of patients who were first admitted to the ICU and underwent invasive ventilation for more than 24 h in the Medical Information Marketplace in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized into successful extubation and tracheotomy groups according to whether they were subsequently successfully extubated or underwent tracheotomy. The patients were randomly divided into model training set and validation set in a ratio of 7:3. Constructing predictive models and evaluating and validating the models. The tracheotomized patients were divided into the early tracheotomy group (< = 7 days) and the late tracheotomy group (> 7 days), and the prognosis of the two groups was analyzed.ResultsA total of 7 key variables were screened: Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, pneumonia, traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, left and right pupil responses to light, and parenteral nutrition. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the prediction model constructed through these seven variables was 0.897 (95% CI: 0.876–0.919), and 0.896 (95% CI: 0.866–0.926) for the training and validation sets, respectively. Patients in the early tracheotomy group had a shorter length of hospital stay, IMV duration, and sedation duration compared to the late tracheotomy group (p < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionThe prediction model constructed and validated based on the MIMIC-IV database can accurately predict the outcome of tracheotomy in critically ill patients. Meanwhile, early tracheotomy in critically ill patients does not improve survival outcomes but has potential advantages in shortening the duration of hospitalization, IMV, and sedation.

The Effect of Delay Following the Clinical Decision to Perform Tracheostomy in the Critical Care Setting.

Tracheostomy in patients who are critically ill is generally performed due to prolonged mechanical ventilation and expected extubation failure. However, tracheostomy criteria and ideal timing are poorly defined, including equivocal data from randomized controlled trials and median intubation to tracheostomy times that range from 7-21 d. However, a consistent finding is that only ∼50% of late tracheostomy groups actually undergo tracheostomy, with non-performance due to recovery or clinical deterioration. Unlike in many jurisdictions, elective surgical procedures in our institution require a court-appointed guardian, which necessitates an approximately 1-week delay between the decision to perform tracheostomy and surgery. This offers a unique opportunity to observe patients with potential tracheostomy during a delay between the decision and the performance. ICU patients who were ventilated were identified for inclusion retrospectively by an application for guardianship relating to tracheostomy, the intention-to-treat point. The main outcomes of tracheostomy, extubation, or death/palliative care after inclusion were noted. Demographics, outcomes, and event timing were compared for the 3 outcome groups. Tracheostomy-related guardianship requests were made for 388 subjects. Of these, 195 (50%) underwent tracheostomy, whereas 127 (33%) were extubated and 66 (17%) either died before tracheostomy (46 [12%]) or were transitioned to palliative care (20 [5%]). The median time (interquartile range) from guardianship request until a defining event was the following: 6.2 (4.0-11) d for tracheostomy, 5.0 (2.9-8.2) d for extubation (P < .001 as compared to tracheostomy group), and 6.5 (2.5-11) d for death/palliative care (P = .55 as compared to tracheostomy). Neurological admissions were more common in the tracheostomy group and less common in the palliative group. Other admission demographics and hospitalization characteristics were similar. Hospital mortality was higher for subjects undergoing tracheostomy (58/195 [30%]) versus extubation (24/127 [19%]) (P = .03). Delay in performing tracheostomy due to legal requirements was associated with a 50% decrease in the need for tracheostomy. This suggests that decision-making with regard to ideal tracheostomy timing could be improved, saving unnecessary procedures.

The effect of tracheotomy timing on short- term prognosis in hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage patients after craniectomy: a retrospective analysis of early vs late intervention

Objective: The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and short-term prognosis in patients with hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage (HICH) with basal ganglia haematoma volume ≥ 60 mL who underwent early tracheotomy versus late tracheotomy post-craniectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted based on the data of 102 patients with basal ganglia haematoma volume ≥ 60 mL after craniectomy between 2016 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: early tracheotomy and late tracheotomy. This study evaluated the effect of early tracheotomy on prognosis within 90 days and the impact of tracheotomy timing on overall survival in patients with HICH. Results: Patients in the early tracheotomy group showed a significant reduction in duration of ventilation and intracranial pressure (ICP) at 24 hours (post-tracheotomy) compared to those in the late tracheotomy group. Multivariable logistic regression indicated that late tracheotomy after craniectomy, old age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 6, large haematoma volume, and pneumonia after tracheotomy were risk factors for poor prognosis within 90 days in patients with HICH undergoing tracheotomy postoperatively. In terms of the impact of tracheotomy timing on overall survival in patients with HICH, 46 patients died within a follow-up period of 90 days; 19 in the early tracheotomy group (overall survival rate 62.7%), and 27 in the late tracheotomy group (overall survival of 47.1%). Conclusions: Early tracheotomy significantly improved the short-term prognosis of patients with HICH, with a higher overall survival rate compared to late tracheotomy within 90 days of illness.

A cross-sectional study to evaluate the impact of early tracheostomy in management of neurosurgical patients.

Tracheostomy is a crucial procedure in the management of neurosurgical patients, and determining the appropriate timing for the intervention remains a contentious issue. While some experts advocate for early tracheostomy, others recommend a more conservative approach of closely monitoring the patient's condition before performing the procedure. To shed light on this debate, a retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 78 cases who underwent tracheostomy in the neurosurgical ICU of Yashosai Hospital, Nanded, Maharashtra, between January and December 2022. The study relied on hospital records, and descriptive statistics were used to represent the quantitative data. The study's findings showed that the majority of the study subjects were male, with an average age of 46.3 + / - 15.2years. The results suggested that early tracheostomy was associated with improved outcomes in terms of shorter durations of tracheostomy, hospital stays, ICU stays, and mechanical ventilation. However, the incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the early and late tracheostomy groups. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the optimal management of neurosurgical patients, with implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.

The impact of delayed tracheostomy on critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study in a chinese tertiary hospital

ObjectivesThe timing of tracheostomy for critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) is a topic of controversy. Our objective was to determine the most suitable timing for tracheostomy in patients undergoing MV.DesignRetrospective cohort study.Setting and participantsOne thousand eight hundred eighty-four hospitalisations received tracheostomy from January 2011 to December 2020 in a Chinese tertiary hospital.MethodsTracheostomy timing was divided into three groups: early tracheostomy (ET), intermediate tracheostomy (IMT), and late tracheostomy (LT), based on the duration from tracheal intubation to tracheostomy. We established two criteria to classify the timing of tracheostomy for data analysis: Criteria I (ET ≤ 5 days, 5 days < IMT ≤ 10 days, LT > 10 days) and Criteria II (ET ≤ 7 days, 7 days < IMT ≤ 14 days, LT > 14 days). Parameters such as length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and duration of MV were used to evaluate outcomes. Additionally, the outcomes were categorized as good prognosis, poor prognosis, and death based on the manner of hospital discharge. Student’s t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, Chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were employed as appropriate to assess differences in demographic data and individual characteristics among the ET, IMT, and LT groups. Univariate Cox regression model and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model were utilized to determine whether delaying tracheostomy would increase the risk of death.ResultsIn both of two criterion, patients with delayed tracheostomies had longer hospital stays (p < 0.001), ICU stays (p < 0.001), total time receiving MV (p < 0.001), time receiving MV before tracheostomy (p < 0.001), time receiving MV after tracheostomy (p < 0.001), and sedation durations. Similar results were also found in sub-population diagnosed as trauma, neurogenic or digestive disorders. Multinomial Logistic regression identified LT was independently associated with poor prognosis, whereas ET conferred no clinical benefits compared with IMT.ConclusionsIn a mixed ICU population, delayed tracheostomy prolonged ICU and hospital stays, sedation durations, and time receiving MV. Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified delayed tracheostomies as independently correlated with worse outcomes.Trial registrationChiCTR2100043905. Registered 05 March 2021.http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx

Effect of tracheotomy timing on patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

We assessed the effects of tracheostomy timing (early vs. late) on outcomes among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant RCTs of tracheotomy timing on patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data. Outcomes in patients with early tracheostomy and late tracheostomy groups were compared and analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata14.0 and RevMan 5.4 software. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022360319). Twenty-one RCTs were included in this Meta-analysis. The Meta-analysis indicated that early tracheotomy could significantly shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD: -2.77; 95% CI -5.10~ -0.44; P = 0.02) and the length of ICU stay (MD: -6.36; 95% CI -9.84~ -2.88; P = 0.0003), but it did not significantly alter the all-cause mortality (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73~1.00; P = 0.06), the incidence of pneumonia (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74~1.01; P = 0.06), and length of hospital stay (MD: -3.24; 95% CI -7.99~ 1.52; P = 0.18). In patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the tracheostomy performed at an earlier stage may shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of ICU stay but cannot significantly decrease the all-cause mortality and incidence of pneumonia.

Frequency of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia among ICU Admitted Patients with Early Versus Delayed Tracheostomy

Objective: Patients on mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently develop ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), an acquired lung infection. The incidence of VAP varies highly in different setups. This study aimed to determine the incidence of VAP in the surgical ICU and the associated costs. Materials &amp; Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted and included 116 patients who had a tracheostomy in the surgical ICU of Lahore General Hospital. They were observed for the occurrence of VAP, mortality, ICU stay in days, and cost of the ICU stay. Tracheostomies done before 7 days from mechanical ventilation with the expectation of needing extended ventilatory support were classified as early tracheostomies (Group E), whereas those performed after 7 days owing to failure to wean were classified as late tracheostomies (Group L). Results: Patients in the early tracheostomy group had a mean age of 45.16 years, while those in the late tracheostomy group had a mean age of 50.00 years. Compared to the early tracheostomy group, the late tracheostomy group had a greater incidence of VAP, 8(25.8%) and 24(53.33%), and mortality, 8(25.8%) and 22(48.88%), respectively. Mean values like pre-tracheostomy ventilation were 4.70 &amp; 12.17 days, ICU stay was 9.54 &amp; 16.64 days and total cost in PKR was 796774.19 &amp; 1438888, respectively among early tracheostomy &amp; late tracheostomy groups. Conclusion: The occurrence of VAP and mortality is significantly lower in patients who have undergone early tracheostomy.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Early and Late Tracheostomy.

The timing of tracheostomy in ventilated patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the effect of early tracheostomy (≤7 d) with late tracheostomy (>7 d) on the prognosis of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. This was a retrospective observational cohort study. The data of 175 patients who received tracheostomy at the ICU between January 1, 2015-July 31, 2022, were collected. Patients were excluded from the study if medical records were incomplete or they underwent tracheostomy as part of a planned operation procedure. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to correct the baseline characteristics between the early and late tracheostomy groups. The treatment process and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) between groups. After propensity score matching, 88 subjects were included in the analysis. Compared with the late tracheostomy group, the incidence of VAP, hospital length of stay, sedation-free days, ventilator-free days, and ICU-free days were longer in the early tracheostomy group. There were no significant differences in the 90-d mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS;: Early tracheostomy can reduce the occurrence of complications for ICU patients.

Early Tracheostomy in Older Trauma Patient Is Associated With Comparable Outcomes to Younger Cohort

IntroductionEarly tracheostomy (ET) is associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia (PNA) and mechanical ventilation duration (MVD) in hospitalized patients with trauma. The purpose of this study is to determine if ET also benefits older adults compared to the younger cohort. MethodsAdult hospitalized trauma patients who received a tracheostomy as registered in The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2013 to 2019 were analyzed. Patients with tracheostomy prior to admission were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts consisting of those aged ≥65 and those aged <65. These cohorts were analyzed separately to compare the outcomes of ET (<5 d; ET) versus late tracheostomy (LT) (≥5 d; LT). The primary outcome was MVD. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and PNA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with significance defined as P value < 0.05. ResultsIn patients aged <65, ET was performed within a median of 2.3 d (interquartile range, 0.47-3.8) after intubation and a median of 9.9 d (interquartile range, 7.5-13) in the LT group. The ET group's Injury Severity Score was significantly lower with fewer comorbidities. There were no differences in injury severity or comorbidities when comparing the groups. ET was associated with lower MVD (d), PNA, and HLOS on univariate and multivariate analyses in both age cohorts, although the degree of benefit was higher in the less than 65 y cohort [ET versus LT MVD: 5.08 (4.78-5.37), P < 0.001; PNA: 1.45 (1.36-1.54), P < 0.001; HLOS: 5.48 (4.93-6.04), P < 0.001]. Mortality did not differ based on time to tracheostomy. ConclusionsET is associated with lower MVD, PNA, and HLOS in hospitalized patients with trauma regardless of age. Age should not factor into timing for tracheostomy placement.

Early Tracheostomy and Outcomes in Ventilated Pediatric Trauma Patients

IntroductionThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric ventilated patients who underwent early tracheostomy. Our hypothesis is early tracheostomy will be associated with less ventilator days, Intensive care (ICU) days and hospital days. MethodsThe Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the calendar year 2017 through 2019 was used for the study. All pediatric trauma patients ≤17 years who were admitted to the hospital and were placed on mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Other variables included patients’ demography, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, types of procedure that were performed for hemorrhage control. Propensity score matching analysis was performed between the early (≤7 days) and late tracheostomy (>7 days) groups. The primary outcome of the study was total hospital length of stay. Other outcomes were ICU days, ventilator days. ResultsPropensity score matching created 643 pairs of patients. The median age (years [interquartile range]) of the patient was 14 [8–16]. Most patients suffered from severe injuries with a median ISS 29 [22–38] and GCS score was 3 [3–8]. There was no significant difference identified between the early and the late groups, in hospital stay (24 [23, 26] vs. 24 [23, 26], P = 0.5), ICU days (14 [9–22] vs. 16 [9–23], P = 0.073) and ventilator days (10 [6–17] vs. 11 [7–18], P = 0.068). The incidence of pneumonia between the groups was (8.7% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.347). ConclusionEarly tracheostomy failed to show any outcomes benefit in ventilated pediatric trauma patients.

Tracheostomy in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: Early versus late tracheostomy

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between predictors and the time of tracheostomy after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI). MethodsFive hundred twenty-six patients with TCSCI treated between January,2012 and December, 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were subdivided into two groups: early tracheostomy (≤7 days from initiation of endotracheal intubation) and late tracheostomy. Comparisons between early tracheostomy and late tracheostomy were statistically analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify independent predictors of tracheostomy and calculate probability for different grades of combining predictors to predict tracheostomy. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between the grade of combining predictors and the time to tracheostomy. ResultsAmong 526 eligible patients, 63(12.0%) had a tracheostomy performed. Compared with late tracheostomy group, patients in early tracheostomy group had higher ISS, more severe neurological status while fewer In-hospital LOS days and ICU LOS days. By Logistic regression analysis, severe American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS A), the neurological level of injury (NLI>C5), higher Injury Severity Score (ISS>16) and advanced age (over 50 years old) were identified as independent predictors for tracheostomy. Depending on the likelihood of tracheostomy, the combining predictors were graded into five categories. As the value of probability was higher than 50%, Grade I-III made optimistic predictions about tracheostomy. According to Spearman’s correlation analysis, early tracheostomy had a strong association with Grade I, while late tracheostomy was closely correlated with Grade III. ConclusionsFactors related to the decision of tracheostomy were ASIA impairment scale, neurological level of injury, injury severity score and age. The grades of combining predictors could support indication for predicting the time of tracheostomy.

Impact of Early Tracheostomy on Clinical Outcomes in Trauma Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Causal Analysis

To assess the indications, timing, and clinical outcomes that result from the early tracheostomy (ET) administration, by causal inference models. A retrospective observational study. Multiinstitutional intensive care unit in the United States PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 626 trauma patients. An ET versus late tracheostomy (LT). Trauma patients with tracheostomy were identified from 2 public databases named Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care-IV and eICU Collaborative Research Database. Tracheostomy was defined as early (≤7 days) or late (>7 days) from intensive care unit admission. A marginal structural Cox model (MSCM) with inverse probability weighting was employed. For comparison, the authors also used time-dependent propensity-score matching (PSM) to account for differences in the probability of receiving an ET or LT. A total of 626 eligible patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 321 (51%) received a ET. The MSCM and time-dependent PSM indicated that the ET group was associated with reduced ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) and a shorter mechanical ventilation (MV) duration than the LT group. Yet, mortality did not show any difference between the two groups. The authors' study observed that ET was not associated with reduced mortality in trauma patients, but it was associated with reduced VAP risk and MV duration. The results warrant further validation in randomized controlled trials.

Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.

The timing of tracheostomy (TR) in severe stroke patients receiving mechanical ventilation has not been determined. In this study, we compared some prognostic indicators of early tracheostomy (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT). A meta-analysis was performed to obtain a higher level of evidence of the timing of TR in patients with severe stroke receiving mechanical ventilation. The study was a retrospective single-center study. We divided the severe stroke patients who received TR from June 2020 to June 2022 into the ET group and LT group. The demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics and prognostic indices were compared. For this meta-analysis, we systematically searched PubMed and other databases. The compared prognostic indicators included mechanical ventilation time, ICU length of stay (LOS), total LOS, ventilator-related pneumonia (VAP) incidence, and mortality. A total of 61 patients were included in our study, including 32 patients in the ET group and 29 patients in the LT group. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the NIHSS score in the ET group was higher than that in the LT group (P < 0.05). In terms of outcome indicators, compared with the LT group, the median mechanical ventilation time in the ET group was shortened by 5.5 days (P = 0.034). The ICU LOS and total LOS in the ET group were significantly lower than those in the LT group (median 14.5 days vs 22 days, P = 0.004; 21 days vs 27 days, P = 0.019). The meta-analysis showed that ET could significantly shorten the ICU LOS (MD -3.89 [95% CI: -6.86, -0.92]) and the total LOS (MD -7.70 [95% CI: -8.57, -6.83]) and significantly reduce the occurrence of VAP (OR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.87]). The results of our retrospective study and meta-analysis support that ET can shorten the ICU LOS and total LOS and reduce the occurrence of VAP. Therefore, it has a positive effect on the prognosis of patients with severe stroke who need mechanical ventilation support.

Prediction of factors influencing the timing and prognosis of early tracheostomy in patients with multiple rib fractures: A propensity score matching analysis.

ObjectiveTo investigate the factors affecting the timing and prognosis of early tracheostomy in multiple rib fracture patients.MethodsA retrospective case-control study was used to analyze the clinical data of 222 patients with multiple rib fractures who underwent tracheotomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University from February 2015 to October 2021. According to the time from tracheal intubation to tracheostomy after admission, the patients were divided into two groups: the early tracheostomy group (within 7 days after tracheal intubation, ET) and late tracheostomy group (after the 7th day, LT). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate the differences in baseline characteristics Logistic regression was used to predict the independent risk factors for early tracheostomy. Kaplan–Meier and Cox survival analyses were used to analyze the influencing factors of the 28-day survival.ResultsAccording to the propensity score matching analysis, a total of 174 patients were finally included in the study. Among them, there were 87 patients in the ET group and 87 patients in the LT group. After propensity score matching, Number of total rib fractures (NTRF) (P < 0.001), Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P < 0.001) and Volume of pulmonary contusion(VPC) (P < 0.000) in the ET group were higher than those in the LT group. Univariate analysis showed that the patients who underwent ET had a higher survival rate than those who underwent LT (P = 0.021). Pearson's analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between NTRF and VPC (r = 0.369, P = 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis showed that the areas under the curves were 0.832 and 0.804. The best cutoff-value values of the VPC and NTRF were 23.9 and 8.5, respectively. The Cox survival analysis showed that the timing of tracheostomy (HR = 2.51 95% CI, 1.12–5.57, P = 0.004) and age (HR = 1.53 95% CI, 1.00–2.05, P = 0.042) of the patients had a significant impact on the 28-day survival of patients with multiple rib fractures. In addition, The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the 28-day survival of patients in the ET group was significantly better than that of the LT group, P = 0.01.ConclusionsNTRF, ADRS and VPC are independent risk factors for the timing and prognosis of early tracheotomy. A VPC ≥ 23.9% and/or an NTRF ≥ 8.5 could be used as predictors of ET in patients with multiple rib fractures. Predicting the timing of early tracheostomy also need prediction models in the future.

Indication-based timing of tracheostomy and its effects on outcome in the pediatric intensive care unit.

The objective of study was to find an association between the timing of tracheostomy with duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and length of stay (LOS) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and hospital. The data were collected prospectively from 2000 to 2018 and were analyzed retrospectively. Data included clinical diagnosis, indication, and duration (days) of MV, LOS in PICU and hospital before and after tracheostomy. Patients who did not receive MV or underwent MV for <24 h were excluded. According to the indication of tracheostomy enrolled patients were divided into four groups-airways anomalies (AA), central neurological impairment (CNI), cardiopulmonary insufficiency (CPI), and neuromuscular disorders (NMD). Patients in each group were divided into early (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT) category based on the median (interquartile range interquartile range [IQR]) days of pretracheostomy MV. Two hundred and fifty six patients were analyzed. The frequency and median [IQR] days of pretracheostomy MV were -AA 54 [7(3,16)], CNI 120 [12(9,16)], CPI 51 [25(16.5,30.5)], and NMD 31[12(8,16.5)]. In AA patients, median (IQR) durations of posttracheostomy MV [2(1,5.2) versus 3.5(2,12); p = 0.032], PICU [7(5,8.2) versus11(7,18); p = 0.004] and hospital [12(9.7,21) versus 21.5(12,28); p = 0.027] stays were lower in ET as compared with LT group. Posttracheostomy MV duration was significantly short in ET patients with CNI and NMD (p < 0.005). The total days of MV, PICU and hospital stay were significantly lower in ET as compared with LT patients in all four groups (p < 0.01). As compared with LT, ET patient had shorter durations of total MV and PICU and hospital stay.

Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A significant proportion of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Tracheostomy is increasingly performed when a prolonged course of IMV is anticipated. To determine clinical and resource utilization benefits of early versus late tracheostomy among COVID-19 patients. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were used to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing early and late tracheostomy from January 1, 2020, to December 1, 2021. Twelve studies were selected, and 2222 critically ill COVID-19 patients hospitalized between January to December 2020 were included. Among the included patients, 34.5% and 65.5% underwent early and late tracheostomy, respectively. Among the included studies, 58.3% and 41.7% defined early tracheostomy using cutoffs of 14 and 10 days, respectively. All-cause in-hospital mortality was not different between the early and late tracheostomy groups (32.9% vs. 33.1%; OR = 1.00; P = 0.98). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated a similar mortality rate in studies using a cutoff of 10 days (34.6% vs. 35.5%; OR = 0.97; P = 0.89) or 14 days (31.2% vs. 27.7%; OR = 1.05; P = 0.78). The early tracheostomy group had shorter ICU length of stay (LOS) (mean: 23.18 vs. 30.51 days; P < 0.001) and IMV duration (mean: 20.49 vs. 28.94 days; P < 0.001) than the late tracheostomy group. The time from tracheostomy to decannulation was longer (mean: 23.36 vs. 16.24 days; P = 0.02) in the early tracheostomy group than in the late tracheostomy group, but the time from tracheostomy to IMV weaning was similar in both groups. Other clinical characteristics, including age, were similar in both groups. Early tracheostomy reduced the ICU LOS and IMV duration among COVID-19 patients compared with late tracheostomy, but the mortality rate was similar in both groups. The findings have important implications for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, especially in a resource-limited setting.

"HYPER-EARLY" Tracheostomy within 48 hours has less Complications and Better Prognosis Compared to Traditional Tracheostomy.

Tracheostomies may be performed "early" or "late." There is no agreement on the best timing for tracheostomy. This study compares tracheostomies and complications when performed within 48 hours with those performed from 48hours to 21days. Patients who underwent tracheostomy in the 2017-2018 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) were categorized into 2 groups: early tracheostomy (≤48hours) and late tracheostomy (>48hours to 21days). Primary outcome measured was mortality. Chi square models, Mann-Whitney U Test, and multivariate logistics were used for data analysis. 843 patients had tracheostomy performed, of which 16% underwent early tracheostomy. Majority were male in both early (84%) and late (74%) tracheostomy groups. Mortality was not statically significant in early (13%) or late (9%) (P = .151). Total duration of ventilation in early tracheostomy group was less (5days) compared to late tracheostomy group (16 days, P < .001). Patients with late tracheostomy had almost 18% cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) when compared to early tracheostomy patients (7%, P < .001). Early tracheostomy patients also had shorter hospital length of stay (HLOS) (13 vs 27days) and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (7 vs 20days) than late tracheostomy patients (P<.001). Early tracheostomy patients also had shorter hospital length of stay (HLOS) (13 vs 27 days) and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (7 vs 20days) than late tracheostomy patients (P < .001). Tracheostomy performed as early as 48hours is beneficial as it demonstrates a decrease time on ventilator, decreased HLOS, as well as lower VAP rates. Our data shows "hyper-early" tracheostomies might be more beneficial that the current national practice.

Airway management following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: is tracheostomy mandatory?

ObjectivesAirway management following maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction is a fundamental part of the perioperative management. In oral cavity microvascular reconstruction, the airway is potentially compromised by airway edema, flap edema or bulkiness, hematoma formation, or upper airway sequelae from surgery. Classical teaching advocates elective tracheostomy in patients undergoing maxillofacial free flap reconstruction, while others keep patients intubated overnight (delayed extubation). The optimal method for perioperative airway management is still debated. This study aim was to evaluate the morbidity associated with elective tracheostomy in patients undergoing maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction and to recognize those patients who can avoid elective tracheostomy. MethodsRetrospective review of patients who underwent maxillofacial microvascular free flap reconstruction, between November 1st 2010 and October 31st 2019 in our center. ResultsOne-hundred and nine patients underwent microvascular reconstruction in the maxillofacial region. Sixty-one patients underwent an elective tracheostomy upon the primary surgery. Forty-eight patients were left intubated overnight. Seven patients underwent a late tracheostomy which was performed upon a neck re-exploration for postoperative complications, except for one patient which was due to failed extubation attempt. Patients who didn’t receive an elective tracheostomy were younger and had a shorter duration of postoperative hospitalization. Seven patients suffered from tracheostomy- related complications, all of them underwent elective tracheostomy and none were from the late tracheostomy group. ConclusionsOur results suggest, the routine use of elective tracheostomy in maxillofacial microvascular free flap reconstruction is unnecessary. Elective tracheostomy should be considered on case-to-case basis. Level of evidence4.