You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Invasive III1 Apr 2017PD36-12 COMPARING COMPLICATIONS AND SURVIVAL OF PRIMARY CYSTECTOMY VS. SALAVAGE CYSTECTOMY AFTER TRIMODAL THERAPY Matthew Mossanen, Ross E. Krasnow, Alberto C. Pieretti, Adam S. Feldman, Jason A. Efstathiou, Michael L. Blute, Niall M. Heney, and Matthew F. Wszolek Matthew MossanenMatthew Mossanen More articles by this author , Ross E. KrasnowRoss E. Krasnow More articles by this author , Alberto C. PierettiAlberto C. Pieretti More articles by this author , Adam S. FeldmanAdam S. Feldman More articles by this author , Jason A. EfstathiouJason A. Efstathiou More articles by this author , Michael L. BluteMichael L. Blute More articles by this author , Niall M. HeneyNiall M. Heney More articles by this author , and Matthew F. WszolekMatthew F. Wszolek More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1561AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Patients with advanced bladder cancer may receive radical cystectomy (RC) or Trimodal therapy (TMT) as treatment. After TMT, failure to respond to induction therapy or recurrence may be followed by salvage RC. We compare the timing and nature of complications, and overall survival between these two procedures at our institution. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients from our contemporary cohort spanning from 2002 to 2013 that underwent primary RC and 22 patients that underwent TMT followed by salvage RC for disease progression. Patients were limited to those with a diagnosis of bladder cancer without radiographic evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis. Early (≤90 day) complication rates were compared using Fisher′s exact test. Overall survival and late (>90 day) complications were compared using Kaplan Meier curves, and the log-rank test. RESULTS From 2003 to 2013 we identified 239 patients who underwent primary RC and 22 patients who underwent salvage RC. The median age of the cohort was 68, 76% were male and the median follow-up was 5 years. The groups had similar baseline characteristics, except that those that underwent salvage RC had higher rates of tobacco use (95% vs 68%, p=0.006), and were less likely have a neobladder (4.6% vs 8.8%, p=0.03). 43 patients (17%) that underwent primary cystectomy received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There were no significant differences between salvage RC and primary RC in terms of overall survival (log-rank P=0.8) or disease specific survival (P=0.7). The overall early complication rate was 77% after salvage RC compared to 57% after primary RC (p=0.07). Early infectious complications were significantly higher after salvage (36% vs 11%, p=0.002). The 1-, 3-, and 5-yr overall late complications rate after salvage RC was 8.3%, 36%, and 68% compared to 5.8%, 14%, and 16% after primary RC (log-rank p=0.033, Figure 1), respectively. After salvage, there was an increased rate of late infectious (23% vs 7.5, p=0.03) and late gastrointestinal (27% vs 4.0%, p=<0.001) complications. CONCLUSIONS The overall survival, disease specific survival, and overall early complication rates are comparable between primary cystectomy and salvage cystectomy after TMT. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e673 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Matthew Mossanen More articles by this author Ross E. Krasnow More articles by this author Alberto C. Pieretti More articles by this author Adam S. Feldman More articles by this author Jason A. Efstathiou More articles by this author Michael L. Blute More articles by this author Niall M. Heney More articles by this author Matthew F. Wszolek More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...