Late-detected Developmental Dysplasia Research Articles

Comparative long-term outcomes of Petit-Morel versus overhead traction methods versus immediate closed reduction for late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic review

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of traction to assist reduction in patients with late-detected developmental dislocation of the hip using the Petit-Morel technique versus the Bryant overhead traction technique, and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of these two traction techniques with immediate closed reduction. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was performed to identify relevant studies. Studies on Petit-Morel and overhead traction techniques and immediate closed reduction were then screened, selected, and data collected; included studies were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Results: In total, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The Petit-Morel group had a successful reduction rate of 87% while the overhead traction group had a successful reduction rate of 67.1%, and the immediate closed reduction group had a successful reduction rate of 78.4% (Petit-Morel versus overhead traction, p < 0.001; overhead traction versus immediate closed reduction, p < 0.001, Petit-Morel versus immediate closed reduction, p = 0.021). The Petit-Morel group had an overall avascular necrosis rate of 2.7%, compared to 10.6% for overhead traction and 21.5% for immediate closed reduction (Petit-Morel versus overhead traction, p = 0.001; Petit-Morel versus immediate closed reduction, p < 0.001; overhead traction versus immediate closed reduction, p < 0.001). The Petit-Morel group achieved a satisfaction rate of 86.4% according to the Severin classification, as compared to 71.2% in the overhead traction group and 76.4% in the immediate closed reduction group (Petit-Morel versus overhead traction, p < 0.001; Petit-Morel versus immediate closed reduction, p = 0.018; overhead traction versus immediate closed reduction, p = 0.195). Conclusion: Petit-Morel and overhead traction techniques did not outperform immediate closed reduction in terms of redislocation rates, and radiological satisfaction, the Petit-Morel technique, has lower clinically significant avascular necrosis rates than overhead traction and immediate closed reduction. Level of evidence: Level III.

Clinical outcomes of gradual reduction of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip using ultrasound-guided flexion abduction continuous traction: a midterm follow up study.

Reducing the avascular necrosis (AVN) rate in infants treated for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is important. We previously reported the clinical outcomes of gradual reduction via ultrasound-guided flexion abduction continuous traction (FACT-R), which achieved a 99% reduction with an AVN rate of 1.0% in infants <12 months. Here, we investigated the clinical outcomes of late-detected DDH after FACT-R. Infants ≥12 months who were treated with FACT-R for DDH from January 1995 to 2007 and followed up for 6 years were enrolled. Treatment comprised continuous traction, a hip-spica cast, and an abduction brace. The rates of reduction, redislocation, AVN, and secondary osteotomy surgery were evaluated. In the study patients (n = 26, hips 30), the mean age at the time of traction therapy was 23 months (range: 13-44) and the mean follow-up was 12.5 years (range: 6-16.4). Female gender and the left side were predominant. The rates of reduction, redislocation, and AVN were 100%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. However, 25 hips (83%) required secondary osteotomy surgery, including Salter innominate osteotomy in 21 hips, Salter innominate osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy in 3 hips, and triple pelvic osteotomy in 1 hip. They had a larger acetabular index after FACT-R (P = 0.04) and a longer duration of FACT-R (P = 0.05). All hips were successfully reduced, with no redislocation or AVN. However, most hips required a secondary osteotomy surgery because of residual dysplasia. Careful follow-up and informed consent for secondary osteotomy surgery is thus essential.

Morphological Changes and Concentricity of the Hip Joint During Gradual Reduction in Infants with Late-Detected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Study.

The relationship between hip morphological changes and joint concentricity in infants with late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) treated with gradual reduction remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated hip morphological changes and concentricity in infants with late-detected unilateral DDH using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during gradual reduction. We enrolled 20 infants aged ≥ 12months with unilateral DDH. Treatment comprised continuous traction, a hip-spica cast, and an abduction brace. MRI was performed before treatment, immediately after hip-spica cast placement, after cast removal, and at the end of the brace. We evaluated the acetabulum and femoral head morphology and joint concentricity. The mean age was 25months, and female sex and the left side were predominant. Before treatment, the acetabulum was small and shallow and the femoral head was spherically flat on the affected side. Immediately after the continuous traction, the affected acetabulum and femoral head were still smaller than the healthy/contralateral one. However, they improved to a deeper acetabulum and round femoral head. Intra-articular soft tissue (IAST) and femoral-acetabular distance (FAD) continuously decreased, indicating gradual improvement in joint concentricity. Deeper formation of the acetabulum and round shaping of the femoral head had occurred even in non-concentric reduction. The shape and concentricity of the hip joint improved after treatment; however, the acetabulum and femoral head remained small. The deeper acetabulum and round femoral head were observed the non-concentric reduction before the concentric reduction was achieved. The continuous decrease in IAST and FAD indicates effective post-traction therapy.

The incidence of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip and its functional outcomes: a 17-year cohort study using selective ultrasound screening.

We aimed to establish the incidence of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with a selective ultrasound (US) examination over 17 years using the femoral head coverage (FHC) as a US measurement. The secondary aim was to establish the everyday function using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The incidence of late-detected DDH was based on 60,844 children. Patients diagnosed for the first time after 3 months and before the age of 8 years were included. In the second part of the study, consent to participate was mandatory. PROMIS-25 Pediatric, PROMIS-25 Parent, and EQ-5D-5L were used according to the patient's age to assess everyday function. The incidence of late-detected DDH was 0.48/1,000. The median age at diagnosis was 8 months (range 4-41 months), with a tendency to require repeated treatment with open surgery if DDH was diagnosed later. Most children reported no or minor health problems with a mean of 18 years' follow-up. We found that selective US examination of the hips by measuring the FHC is a reliable method to examine newborns for DDH resulting in a low incidence of late-detected DDH amounting to 0.48/1,000 newborn children.

Secondary Surgery and Residual Dysplasia Following Late Closed or Open Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Outcomes studies following successful closed reduction of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) reveal high rates of secondary reconstructive surgery with limited comparative data demonstrating lower rates of residual dysplasia with open reduction. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcomes, with regard to radiographic evidence of residual dysplasia and secondary reconstructive procedures, between late closed and late open reduction for DDH in patients 6 to 24 months of age at reduction. We identified all patients between 6 and 24 months of age who underwent closed or open reduction for DDH between 1980 and 2008 and were followed until at least 10 years of age. Outcomes included radiographic measurement of acetabular dysplasia after triradiate cartilage closure, development of osteonecrosis, and the need for secondary procedures for residual dysplasia. One hundred and four hips underwent index closed reduction and 54 hips underwent index open reduction. There was no significant difference in the age at reduction (p = 0.07). Among the 116 hips for which initial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were available, most closed reductions (55%) were performed in International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade-III hips whereas most open reductions (71%) were performed in IHDI grade-IV hips. Analysis of the hips that did not undergo a secondary procedure showed that those with an index open reduction had a greater lateral center-edge angle (mean and standard deviation, 27.2° ± 10.0° versus 22.4° ± 6.8° in the closed reduction cohort; p = 0.02), lower femoral head extrusion index (22.2% ± 8.9% versus 26.0% ± 6.2%; p = 0.04), and lower Sharp angle (43.3° ± 6.0° versus 46.6° ± 3.1°; p = 0.002) at triradiate closure. There was no difference in the prevalence of osteonecrosis (Bucholz-Ogden grades II, III, and IV) between the closed and open reduction cohorts (22% versus 19%, respectively; p = 0.60). Secondary procedures were performed more frequently after closed reduction than after open reduction (47% versus 30%, respectively; p = 0.03). In patients with late reduction of DDH, closed reduction was associated with increased residual dysplasia and it was associated with a higher rate of secondary surgery in those >12 months old despite a decreased severity of displacement based on the IHDI classification. Additional, prospective studies with assessment of functional outcomes are needed to validate these findings. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Response to comment on Terjesen and Horn: 'Prognostic value of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip'.

Response to comment on Terjesen and Horn: 'Prognostic value of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip'.

Comment on Terjesen and Horn: 'Prognostic value of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip'.

Comment on Terjesen and Horn: 'Prognostic value of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip'.

Prognostic value of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip.

PurposeThe aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of three classifications of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), especially to assess whether they are predictive of long-term outcomes.MethodsTwo groups of patients were analyzed. Group 1 (57 patients, 69 hips) underwent closed reduction between 1958 and 1962. Mean age at reduction was 20.3 months (4 to 65). Group 2 (50 patients, 54 hips) treated between 1996 and 2005, was used for analysis of the association between severity of dislocation and treatment (open or closed reduction). The primary radiographs were graded according to the Tönnis classification, the classification of the International Hip Dysplasia Institute and a new method based on the position of the most lateral point of the proximal femoral metaphysis (lateral metaphysis height classification, LMH). The outcome at a mean age of 51.2 years (55 to 60) was graded according to the occurrence of osteoarthritis (OA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).ResultsThere were significant associations between the classifications, and the intra- and interobserver agreements were high. More severe grades of DDH were significantly associated with age ≥ 18 months and with open reduction. None of the classifications were significantly associated with long-term OA. The LMH method was significantly associated with the need for THA, whereas the other classifications were not.ConclusionAll the classifications were reliable in grading severity of DDH. The LMH method seems preferable in clinical practice because the main landmarks were easy to define and because it had long-term prognostic value.Level of EvidenceIII

Effect of abduction on avascular necrosis of the femoral epiphysis in patients with late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction: a MRI study of 59 hips.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore whether increasing the hip abduction angle would increase the incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN) in patients with late- detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) treated by closed reduction (CR) and spica cast immobilization.MethodsA total of 55 patients (59 hips) with late-detected DDH underwent MRI after CR. Hip abduction angle and hip joint distance were measured on postoperative MRI transverse sections. The acetabular index and centre-edge angle were measured on plain radiographs at the last follow-up. The presence of AVN according to Kalamchi and McEwen’s classification was assessed. We retrospectively analyzed the associations among abduction angles, hip joint distances, radiographic parameters, AVN and final outcomes, exploring the relationship between hip joint abduction angle and AVN rate.ResultsThe mean age at the time of CR was 14.4 months SD 5.5 (6 to 28), and the mean follow-up was 26.2 months SD 8.1 (12.4 to 41.7). The mean hip abduction angle was 70.2° SD 7.2° (53° to 85°) on the dislocated side and 63.7° SD 8.8° (40° to 82°) on the normal side; the mean hip joint distance was 5.1 mm SD 1.9 (1.3 to 9.1) on the dislocated side and 2.2 mm SD 0.6 on the normal side (1.3 to 3.3). Eight of 59 hips (13.6%) developed AVN. Neither the amount of abduction nor hip joint distance increased the AVN rate (p = 0.97 and p = 0.65, respectively) or the dislocation rate (p = 0.38 and p = 0.14, respectively).ConclusionAbduction angle up to 70.2° following CR did not increase the AVN rate in children aged six to 28 months with late-detected DDH treated by CR.Level of evidenceIII.

Traction does not decrease failure of reduction and femoral head avascular necrosis in patients aged 6-24 months with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction: a review of 385 patients and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of preliminary traction on the rate of failure of reduction and the incidence of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) in patients with late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction. A total of 385 patients (440 hips) treated by closed reduction satisfied the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided in two groups according to treatment modality: a traction group (276 patients) and a no-traction group (109 patients). Tönnis grade, rate of failure reduction, AVN rate, acetabular index, center-edge angle of Wiberg, and Severin's radiographic grade were assessed on plain radiographs, and the results were compared between the two groups of patients. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed based on the existing comparative studies to further evaluate the effect of traction on the incidence of AVN. Tönnis grade in the traction group was significantly higher than in the no-traction group (P = 0.021). The overall rate of failure reduction was 8.2%; no significant difference was found between the traction (9.2%) and no-traction groups (5.6%) (P = 0.203). The rates of failure reduction were similar in all Tönnis grades, regardless of treatment modality (P > 0.05). The rate of AVN in the traction group (14%) was similar to that of the no-traction group (14.5%; P = 0.881). Moreover, the rates of AVN were similar in all Tönnis grades, regardless of treatment modality (P > 0.05). The meta-analysis did not identify any significant difference in the AVN rate whether preliminary traction was used or not (odds ratio = 0.76, P = 0.32). At the last follow-up visit, the two groups of patients had comparable acetabular indices, center-edge angles, and Severin's radiographic grades (P > 0.05). In conclusion, preliminary traction does not decrease the failure of reduction and the incidence of AVN in developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction between 6 and 24 months of age.

Closed reduction in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip: indications, results and complications.

PurposeThe aim of the study was a review of the literature in order to evaluate the results and complications of closed reduction in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsThis study consisted of an analysis of the literature relative to late-detected DDH treatment options considering hip congruency, rates of re-dislocation and of avascular necrosis.ResultsGradual closed reduction (Petit-Morel method) appears to be an effective method concerning joint congruency restitution. Dislocation relapse and avascular necrosis are more efficiently prevented with closed versus open reduction. The tendency for spontaneous correction of acetabular dysplasia decreases if closed reduction is performed after 18 months of age. Patient age at the beginning of traction should be considered for the prognosis, with a lower rate of satisfactory results showing after the age of 3 years.ConclusionIn our opinion, the Petit-Morel method is a suitable treatment option for children aged between six months and three years with idiopathic DDH.

Early diagnosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip: what can we do in China?

Universal ultrasound screening in newborn has been accepted for reducing the incidence of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Unfortunately, the neonatal ultrasound screening strategy has not been applied in the mainland of China, which leads to a high incidence of late-detected DDH.Before implementing the neonatal ultrasound screening strategy, the clinical screening by limited abduction is valid to early diagnose the dislocated hip joint.Additionally, it is necessary to screen all the newborn with high risk factors of DDH, such as positive family history, breech presentation and postnatal hip extended swaddling.Early screening of DDH is the common responsibi-lity of child care doctors, including community health physician, pediatrician or pediatric orthopedist.Currently, it is imperative to build regional neonatal ultrasound screening system for DDH in the regions with tertiary pediatric orthopedic center. Key words: Developmental dysplasia of the hip; Early diagnosis; Ultrasound screening; High risk factors

Have Changes in Treatment of Late-detected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip During the Last Decades Led to Better Radiographic Outcome?

Despite considerable changes in the treatment of of late-detected congenital or developmental hip dislocation (DDH) during the last 50 years, it is unclear whether and to what degree these changes have led to better long-term outcome for the patients. The aims of this study were to see whether decreasing use of skin traction and instead a more aggressive approach to open reduction resulted in (1) reduced use of secondary procedures; (2) improved radiographic appearance of the hips at long-term followup; and (3) changes in the proportion of patients developing avascular necrosis. Two groups of patients were compared retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were patient age older than 3 months and younger than 5 years at the initiation of treatment, no associated anomaly, no previous treatment in other hospitals, and available radiographs from the time of diagnosis to skeletal maturity. Group A consisted of 56 patients (51 girls [91%]; 74 hips) primarily treated during the period 1958 to 1962. Group B comprised 38 patients (36 girls [95%]; 40 hips) treated during the period 1996 to 2002. The mean age at the time of hip reduction was 20 months (SD 9.6) in Group A and 17 months (SD 11.9) in Group B. The mean time in skin traction had decreased from 35 days (SD 12.5) to 11 days (SD 5.7) over the years (p < 0.001). Open reduction was performed in six of 74 hips (8%) in Group A and 15 of 40 hips (37%) in Group B (p < 0.001). The immobilization time in the hip spica had decreased from 9 to 6 months (p < 0.001). The indication for secondary procedures to correct residual dysplasia was center-edge angle < 20° and was similar in both groups. A modified version of the radiographic classification of Severin was used to compare the results. Secondary procedures to correct residual dysplasia were performed in 28 of 74 hips (38%) in Group A and seven of 40 hips (18%) in Group B (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.89; p = 0.025) At skeletal maturity, the proportion of patients with satisfactory radiographic results (Severin Grades I/II) was larger in Group B (33 of 40 hips [82%]) than in Group A (46 of 74 hips [62%]; OR, 0.35; CI, 0.14-0.89; p = 0.025). Femoral head coverage, assessed as the center-edge angle, was greater in Group B than in Group A (mean 26° versus 22°; CI, 0.8-7.9; p = 0.016). There was no difference in the proportion of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (seven of 74 hips [9%] in Group A and five of 40 [13%] in Group B; OR, 1.4; CI, 0.4-4.6; p = 0.614). The move away from prolonged use of skin traction and toward more frequent open reduction for children with a late diagnosis of DDH appears to result in fewer secondary procedures and a better radiographic appearance of the hip at skeletal maturity. Based on the present results, we cannot conclude whether preliminary traction is needed; this question should be evaluated in future long-term studies with a prospective, randomized design. Level III, therapeutic study.