Late Closure Group Research Articles

Long-Term Functional Outcome After Early vs. Late Stoma Closure in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Sub-analysis of the Multicenter FORCE Trial

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of early stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer.MethodsPatients participating in the FORCE trial who underwent LAR with protective stoma were included in this study. Patients were subdivided into an early closure group (< 3 months) and late closure group (> 3 months). Endpoints of this study were the Wexner Incontinence, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), EORTC QLQ-CR29, and fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scores at 1 year.ResultsBetween 2017 and 2020, 38 patients had received a diverting stoma after LAR for rectal cancer and could be included. There was no significant difference in LARS (31 vs. 30, p = 0.63) and Wexner score (6.2 vs. 5.8, p = 0.77) between the early and late closure groups. Time to stoma closure in days was not a predictor for LARS (R2 = 0.001, F (1,36) = 0.049, p = 0.83) or Wexner score (R2 = 0.008, F (1,36) = 0.287, p = 0.60) after restored continuity. There was no significant difference between any of the FIQL domains of lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment. In the EORTC QLQ-29, body image scored higher in the late closure group (21.3 vs. 1.6, p = 0.004).ConclusionTiming of stoma closure does not appear to affect long-term bowel function and quality of life, except for body image. To improve functional outcome, attention should be focused on other contributing factors.

Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer.

Protective ileostomy can effectively prevent severe anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the safety and long-term outcomes of early ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery combined with protective ileostomy and adjuvant chemotherapy between April 2017 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into an early closure group during chemotherapy (group A) and a late closure group after chemotherapy (group B). A total of 215 patients were included in this study, with 115 in group A and 100 in group B. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. In group A, durations of stoma status (p < 0.001) and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (p < 0.001) were shorter, and rectal stenosis (p=0.036) and stoma-related complications (p=0.007), especially stoma stenosis (p=0.041), were less common. However, compliance with chemotherapy was worse (p=0.009). There were no significant differences in operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, incidence and severity of LARS, disease-free survival, or overall survival between groups. Early ileostomy closure can effectively reduce the duration of stoma status, duration of LARS, rectal stenosis, and stoma-related complications while not affecting surgical complications and oncological outcomes. Ileostomy closure should not be delayed because of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, follow-up should be strengthened to increase compliance and integrity with chemotherapy.

Timing of Closure of a Protective Loop-Ileostomy Can Be Crucial for Restoration of a Functional Digestion.

IntroductionProtective loop-ileostomy is one of the most common interventions in abdominal surgery to provide an alternative intestinal outlet until sufficient healing of a distal anastomosis has occurred. However, closure of a loop-ileostomy is also associated with complications. Thus, knowledge of the optimal time interval between primary and secondary surgery is crucial.MethodsData from 409 patients were retrospectively analyzed regarding complications and risk factors in closure-associated morbidity and mortality. A modified Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications was used to evaluate the severity of complications.ResultsA total of 96 (23.5%) patients suffered from postoperative complications after the closure of the loop-ileostomy. Early closure within 150 days from enterostomy (n = 229) was associated with less complications (p < 0.001**). Looking at the severity of complications, there were significantly more (p = 0.014*) mild postoperative complications in the late closure group (>150 days). Dysfunctional digestive problems—either (sub-) ileus (p = 0.004*), diarrhea or stool incontinence (p = 0.003*)—were the most frequent complications associated with late closure. Finally, we could validate in a multivariate analysis that “time to closure” (p = 0.002*) is independently associated with the development of complications after closure of a protective loop-ileostomy.ConclusionLate closure (>150 days) of a loop-ileostomy is an independent risk factor in post-closure complications in a multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, circumstances of disease and therapy need to be considered when scheduling the closure procedure.

Relationship between diverting stoma and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: a nationwide study using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan.

Patients at risk of recurrence after curative surgery for rectal cancer usually receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative recovery after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer can be improved by placement of a diverting stoma to reduce anastomotic leakage. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma affects administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients. We identified Japanese patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12months of surgery in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Doses of five types of chemotherapy administered (tegafur/uracil, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) were assessed according to the presence or absence of diverting stoma and the timing of stoma closure. There was no significant difference in the cumulative doses of chemotherapy administered in the 12months after LAR between patients with and without diverting stoma, but more doses were administered in the early postoperative period (0-2months after LAR) in patients without diverting stoma. Also, more doses of chemotherapy, regardless of type, were administered in the late closure group (7-12months after LAR) than in the early closure (≤ 6months) and no closure groups. Presence of a diverting stoma did not influence the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy administered within 12months after LAR but could have delayed the start of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with late closure of a diverting stoma received more doses of adjuvant chemotherapy administered over 12months.

Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer.

BackgroundLow anterior resection syndrome (LARS) has a significant impact on postoperative quality of life. Although early closure of an ileostomy is safe in selected patients, functional outcomes have not been investigated. The aim was to compare bowel function and the prevalence of LARS in patients who underwent early or late closure of an ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer.MethodsEarly closure (8–13 days) was compared with late closure (after 12 weeks) of the ileostomy following rectal cancer surgery in a multicentre RCT. Exclusion criteria were: signs of anastomotic leakage, diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment and postoperative complications. Bowel function was evaluated using the LARS score and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (BFI).ResultsFollowing index surgery, 112 participants were randomized (55 early closure, 57 late closure). Bowel function was evaluated at a median of 49 months after stoma closure. Eighty‐two of 93 eligible participants responded (12 had died and 7 had a permanent stoma). Rates of bowel dysfunction were higher in the late closure group, but this did not reach statistical significance (major LARS in 29 of 40 participants in late group and 25 of 42 in early group, P = 0·250; median BFI score 63 versus 71 respectively, P = 0·207). Participants in the late closure group had worse scores on the urgency/soiling subscale of the BFI (14 versus 17; P = 0·017). One participant in the early group and six in the late group had a permanent stoma (P = 0·054).ConclusionPatients undergoing early stoma closure had fewer problems with soiling and fewer had a permanent stoma, although reduced LARS was not demonstrated in this cohort. Dedicated prospective studies are required to evaluate definitively the association between temporary ileostomy, LARS and timing of closure.

Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis

Retrospective research was conducted to compare outcomes between patients who had early (<6 months) or late (>6 months) loop ileostomy closure. Records of patients >18 years of age who underwent circumstomal reversal of a loop ileostomy over a period of 5 years in 1 hospital's colorectal unit were abstracted and analyzed. Data from patients who had a planned or conversion to laparotomy, a concurrent bowel resection, reversal of double-barrel small bowel and colonic stomas, or closure of an end ileostomy or patients whose records were incomplete were excluded. Demographic information, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, primary operation indication, surgery and inpatient dates, readmission within 30 days of discharge, reasons for readmission, complication type, and Clavien-Dindo classification were extracted and compared between early and late closure groups using independent-sample t test and Fisher's exact test. Among the 75 study participants, 25 had an early closure (mean age 68.6 [range 26 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 3.8 months) and 50 had a late closure procedure (mean age 71.6 [range 46 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 12.8 months). Gender distribution, ASA grades, primary surgery indication, and total number of readmissions were similar between the 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (5.5 days vs 9.4 days; P = .01) and average number of complications was significantly lower (0.33 vs 0.61; P = .04) in the early closure group. Rates of postoperative ileus, anastomotic bleed, and wound-related complications were not significantly different. Hospital length of stay and average number of postoperative complications following circumstomal loop ileostomy closure were significantly lower in the early than in the late closure group. Additional studies are warranted to help guide practice.

Early Closure of Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy: Is It Beneficial for the Patient? A Meta-analysis.

To perform a meta-analysis to answer the question, whether early closure (EC) of defunctioning loop ileostomy may be beneficial for patient as compared with late closure (LC) without exceeding the risk of surgical-related morbidity. Medline and the Cochrane Trials Register were searched for trials published up to November 2016 comparing EC (defined as ≤14days from the index operation in which the ileostomy was performed) versus LC for stoma closure after rectal surgery. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.0. Inclusion criteria MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall morbidity rate, anastomotic leakage rate, and wound infection rate within 90days after elective surgery. Six studies were included and analyzed, yielding 570 patients (252 in EC group and 318 in LC). Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the overall morbidity rate between the EC and LC groups (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.22-1.78; P = 0.38). Despite a significant higher wound infection rate of stoma site (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.14-6.86; P < 0.00001), meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the anastomotic leakage rate between the EC and LC groups (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.22-1.78; P = 0.38). Moreover, both stoma-related complications (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.86; P = 0.02) and small bowel obstruction rates (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.20; P < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the EC group than in the LC group, respectively. Heterogeneity of the studies CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that EC of a defunctioning loop ileostomy is effective and safe in careful selected patients without increasing overall postoperative complications. This promising strategy should be proposed in patients in order to reduce stoma-related complications.

Meta-analysis of early versus late closure of a temporary ileostomy after proctectomy

// Xiaozhun Huang 1, * , Chunling Wang 2, * , Zhangkan Huang 1 , Houhong Zhou 1 , Han Li 1 , Fengxiang Shi 3 , Longde Du 4 , Xianni Ke 5 , Biao Zheng 1 , Shuisheng Zhang 6 and Xu Che 6 1 Department of Abdominal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China 2 Department of Hepatology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou 516000, China 3 Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China 4 Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China 5 Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China 6 Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Xu Che, email: drchexu@126.com Shuisheng Zhang, email: thelifeofwater@126.com Keywords: temporary ileostomy; early closure; late closure; complication; hospital stay Received: November 08, 2017 Accepted: January 03, 2018 Published: January 08, 2018 ABSTRACT Background: A temporary ileostomy is frequently constructed to reduce the risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage. An ostomy is a heavy burden on both patient and society, and early closure is therefore desirable to counteract increased morbidity. The optimal time for stoma closure has been investigated in some studies, although it remains controversial. Methods: We conducted a literature search of PubMed, Wiley, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published till 2017 that focused on perioperative complications and details related to early( 4weeks) closure of temporary ileostomies after proctectomy. Results: Six studies (three randomized controlled trials, two prospective non-randomized trials, and one retrospective trial) satisfied our inclusion criteria, and the outcomes of 767 patients (356 early closures and 411 late closures) were analyzed. There was a significantly lower prevalence of skin irritation ( p =0.0002) in the early group, but no worse morbidity outcomes were observed between the early and late closure groups. Hospital stay length after an ileostomy closure was not prolonged following early closure, suggesting that the increased wound infection risk did not significantly delay discharge. Also, the overall hospital stay length, when time since admission for the original operation was included in the late closure group, showed no significantly longer duration in the early closure group ( p = 0.02). Conclusions: We found that early closure of a temporary ileostomy after proctectomy was feasible in selected patients, with some advantages and disadvantages that need to be weighed by the patient and surgeon.

Outcome of stoma closure in babies with necrotising enterocolitis: early vs late closure.

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent SC following stoma formation for NEC between Jan 2009 and July 2015 was done. Early (EC) versus late closure (LC) was defined as less than 10weeks versus at or after 10weeks of stoma formation. Of 36 patients, M:F was 23:13. Indications for laparotomy were pneumoperitoneum (30) and gangrene (6). Postoperatively, 9/15 (60.0%) of EC group required ventilator support versus none in LC group (p<0.05). It took longer to establish full feeds following EC (12days) versus LC (8days). Median duration of postoperative hospital stay following EC was 31days (18-35) versus 7days (4-54) following LC. Three patients were re-operated for intestinal obstruction (two following EC, one following LC). Three patients developed incisional hernia after EC versus none after LC (p<0.05). One patient died after EC due to staphylococcus septicaemia. Early closure before 10weeks of formation for NEC patients is associated with significant morbidity, increased ventilator requirements and chances of developing incisional hernia.

Effectiveness between early and late temporary ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancer: A prospective study

A temporary stoma is often used in rectal cancer surgery to protect a distal anastomosis, which remains a major concern after rectal cancer surgery, particularly after low anterior resection. The temporary stoma is scheduled for closure. However, the optimal time of closure of the protecting stoma remains unclear because of sparse studies and data. We aimed to detect the efficacy between early and late temporary ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. We conducted a prospective, 2-group design between early and late ileostomy closure group in patients after rectal cancer surgery with temporary stoma. Participants were recruited in a teaching hospital in Guangzhou, China. A total of 161 patients confirmed diagnosis of rectal cancer underwent curative surgery and temporary ileostomy. Participants with temporary ileostomy received closure surgery after 1 (early) or 6 (late) months were assessed by clinical parameters and quality of life. Patients in late closure group received more adjuvant chemotherapy cycles but with comparable incidence of stoma closure–related complications and length of hospital stay compared to early closure group. Participants in late closure group with standardized postoperative chemotherapy might have a better prognosis compared with those in early closure group. An increased emphasis should be given to choose the optimal closure time of patients with rectal cancer having temporary ileostomy. Colorectal nurses could provide support to physician for observation of prognosis of different closure time.

Cost Analysis of Early versus Delayed Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Case-Matched Study

Background/Aims: The optimal timing for the closure of loop ileostomies remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether early ileostomy closure (EC) (<2 weeks post-formation) results in significant healthcare savings as against late closure (LC). Methods: Patients with available cost data that underwent EC between January 2008 and December 2012 were compared against matched patients undergoing LC during the same period. Direct hospital costs for the two groups were compared. Results: There were 42 EC patients and 61 LC patients. EC patients had significantly less ileostomy-related complications (p < 0.001) and hospital readmissions (p < 0.001). Operative time (p < 0.001) and operative cost (p = 0.002) were also both significantly less in the EC group. Community nursing costs favoured the LC group (p = 0.047). The EC group had an increased post-closure wound infection rate (p = 0.02). The mean total direct cost per patient was NZD 13,724 (SD NZD 3,736) for EC and NZD 16,728 (SD NZD 8,028) for LC. Representing an average costs saving of NZD 3,004 per patient favouring EC (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Although EC increases the post-closure wound infection rate, EC reduces ileostomy complications, hospital readmissions and operative costs resulting in significant healthcare savings. In order to improve patient outcomes and make EC even more cost effective, efforts should be taken to reduce wound infections.

Late vs early ostomy closure for necrotizing enterocolitis: analysis of adhesion formation, resource consumption, and costs

BackgroundSurgeons prefer to close ostomies at least 6 weeks after the primary operation because of the anticipated postoperative abdominal adhesions. Limited data support this habit. Our aim was to evaluate adhesion formation—together with an analysis of resource consumption and costs—in patients with necrotizing enterocolitis who underwent early closure (EC), compared with a group of patients who underwent late closure (LC). MethodsChart reviews and cost analyses were performed on all patients with necrotizing enterocolitis undergoing ostomy closure from 1997 to 2009. Operative reports were independently scored for adhesions by 2 surgeons. ResultsThirteen patients underwent EC (median, 39 days; range, 32-40), whereas 62 patients underwent LC (median, 94 days; range, 54-150). Adhesion formation in the EC group (10/13 patients, or 77%) was not significantly different (P = 1.000) from the LC group (47/59 patients, or 80%). No differences were found in the costs of hospital stay, surgical interventions, and outpatient clinic visits. ConclusionsOstomy closure within 6 weeks of the initial procedure was not associated with more adhesions or with changes in direct medical costs. Therefore, after stabilization of the patient, ostomy closure can be considered within 6 weeks during the same admission as the initial laparotomy.

The effect of early and late stoma closure on nutritional outcome at 12 months of age in children with meconium ileus secondary to cystic fibrosis

Introduction: A small but significant number of infants with cystic fibrosis (CF) require neonatal surgery to relieve bowel obstruction from meconium ileus (MI). This often results in stoma formation to encourage feeding, weight gain and recycling of stoma output. We have undertaken a retrospective review to determine the impact of time to stoma closure on nutritional status at 12 months of age. Methods: A retrospective case note review of patients currently attending the Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital Regional CF Clinic (n, 282). We recorded duration of stoma and weight centile at three stages: stoma formation, closure, and at 12 month review. Complications of stoma and hospital stay were also noted. Stoma duration less than 8 weeks was classed as early closure (E) and more than 8 weeks as late (L). The change in weight centile at 12 month review was used as a measure of nutritional outcome. Results: 48 children presented with MI (1990–2007); data were available for 26 included in the study. The early and late closure groups consisted of 19 (median time to closure 5 weeks) and 7 patients (13 weeks) respectively. 63% of the early closure group showed an increased weight centile at 12 months compared to 57% of the late group. Stoma duration did not affect post-closure hospital stay. Late stoma closure was associated with increased cases of post closure obstruction (E vs. L; 15.8% vs. 57.1%). Conclusion: This review suggests that the time to stoma closure does not impact significantly on subsequent nutritional status. More studies are needed to determine the optimal post-operative management in this challenging group of children.

Correlation between the age at repair and speech outcome in patients with isolated cleft palate.

The effect of the age at primary palatal repair on the speech of 3-year old children with isolated cleft palate was assessed. The group comprised 108 consecutive children whose palates were repaired at the mean ages of 12.9 (n = 45), 18.5 (n = 18) and 22.1 months (n = 45). Signs of cleft palate speech and the degree of speech impairment were recorded. The signs sought were: hypernasality, audible nasal air emission, and misarticulations associated with velopharyngeal insufficiency. The speech impairments were subdivided into three categories by combining the signs of cleft palate speech. The results showed that children who were operated on at the age of about 12-18 months were significantly better speakers than those operated on later. Of these 46 were rated as normal or practically normal speakers (73%), compared with 10 of the children who had their repairs delayed until about 22 months (22%). As a result of the speech evaluations, it was predicted that 5 (11%), 0 and 21 (47%) children in the early, middle, and late closure groups, respectively, required secondary surgery to eliminate signs of cleft palate speech associated with velopharyngeal inadequacy. The numbers who had secondary surgery were 4, 0 and 18 in the three groups.