Latarjet Procedure For Anterior Instability Research Articles

Are Patients Who Undergo the Latarjet Procedure Ready to Return to Play at 6 Months? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group Cohort Study

Background: The Latarjet procedure is growing in popularity for treating athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability, largely because of the high recurrence rate of arthroscopic stabilization, particularly among contact athletes with bone loss. Purpose: (1) To evaluate return of strength and range of motion (ROM) 6 months after the Latarjet procedure and (2) to determine risk factors for failure to achieve return-to-play (RTP) criteria at 6 months. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 65 athletes (83% contact sports, 37% overhead sports; mean ± SD age, 24.5 ± 8.2 years; 59 male, 6 female) who enrolled in a prospective multicenter study underwent the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability (29% as primary procedure for instability, 71% for failed prior stabilization procedure). Strength and ROM were assessed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. RTP criteria were defined as return to baseline strength and <20° side-to-side ROM deficits in all planes. The independent likelihood of achieving strength and motion RTP criteria at 6 months was assessed through multivariate logistic regression modeling with adjustment as needed for age, sex, subscapularis split versus tenotomy, preoperative strength/motion, percentage bone loss, number of prior dislocations, preoperative subjective shoulder function (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index percentage), and participation in contact versus overhead sports. Results: Of the patients, 55% failed to meet ≥1 RTP criteria: 6% failed for persistent weakness and 51% for ≥20° side-to-side loss of motion. There was no difference in failure to achieve RTP criteria at 6 months between subscapularis split (57%) versus tenotomy (47%) (P = .49). Independent risk factors for failure to achieve either strength or ROM criteria were preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (per 10-point decrease: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.43; P = .006), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index percentage (per 10% decrease: aOR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92; P = .01), and a preoperative side-to-side ROM deficit ≥20° in any plane (aOR, 5.01; 95% CI, 1.42-21.5; P = .01) or deficits in external rotation at 90° of abduction (per 10° increased deficit: aOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.06-2.88; P = .02). Conclusion: A large percentage of athletes fail to achieve full strength and ROM 6 months after the Latarjet procedure. Greater preoperative stiffness and subjective disability are risk factors for failure to meet ROM or strength RTP criteria.

Is Return To Play At 6 Months After Latarjet Safe? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group Cohort Study

Objectives: The Latarjet procedure is the becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of young athletes with recurrent instability. Earlier return to play protocols have been trialed with the thought that one is primarily waiting on bone healing. However, the impact of post-operative range of motion (ROM) and strength must be considered as well. Return to play has traditionally been accepted at 6 months post-operatively, but it is unknown what percentage of athletes achieve full strength and range of motion at that point. The purpose of this study was to 1) To evaluate rates of return of full strength and range of motion at 6 months after Latarjet, and 2) determine whether rates of results vary by percent bone loss, subscapularis split versus tenotomy, or athlete status (contact or overhead). Methods: Ten participating sites throughout the United States enrolled patients in a multicenter prospective cohort study. Sixty-five athletes met inclusion criteria (mean age 24.5 SD 8.2; 59 male, 6 female) and underwent Latarjet procedure for anterior instability (19/65 (29%) primary operation, 46/65 (71%) had a prior failed anterior stabilization). All participated in either contact sports (83%) and/or overhead sports (37%). Regarding anterior glenoid bone loss, 10% had &lt;10% bone loss, 55% had 11-20%, and 35% had 21-30%. The Latarjet procedure was performed with either subscapularis tenotomy (64%) or split (36%). Strength and range of motion were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months after surgery. Return to play (RTP) criteria were defined as full strength as well as less than 20 degrees side-to-side ROM deficits in all planes. The independent likelihood of strength and motion RTP criteria at 6 months for percent bone loss as well as subscapularis tenotomy vs split was assessed with multivariate logistic regression modeling with adjustment as needed for age, sex, preoperative strength/motion, number of prior dislocations, and participation in contact versus overhead sports. Results: 45% of patients failed to meet one or more return to play criteria: 9% failed for persistent weakness and 39% for ≥ 20 degree side to side loss of motion. All patients with loss of motion had ≥ 20 degree external rotation (ER) deficits either with elbow at side (88%) or at 90 degrees abduction (44%). There was no difference in achieving RTP criteria at 6 months between subscapularis split versus tenotomy either for strength (p=0.89) or range of motion (p=0.53). Contact athletes had a 53% RTP rate while overhead athletes had a 67% passage rate (p=0.17). Pre-operative weakness was not significantly predictive of post-operative weakness (p=0.13), and pre-operative external rotation was not predictive of post-operative ER deficits (p=0.16). Percent bone loss was not predictive of side-to side post-operative ROM deficits or weakness (p&gt;0.20 all planes of motion). No other predictors for failure to meet RTP criteria at 6 months were identified. Conclusion: A large percentage of athletes do not have full return of strength and range of motion at 6 months following Latarjet procedure. Further consideration may be warranted prior to releasing these athletes to contact sports.

Efficacité de l’intervention de Latarjet dans l’instabilité d’épaule chez l’épileptique

IntroductionPowerful contractions during epileptic seizures may cause shoulder dislocation and instability. The aim of the study is to evaluate the functional and radiographic results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder dislocation in patients with epilepsy and compare the functional results of these patients with the results of patients without epilepsy. HypothesisIs Latarjet procedure effective in epileptic patients as non-epileptic patients with anterior shoulder instability? Material and methodEleven shoulders of 9 patients with epileptic seizures causing anterior shoulder instability were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had a Latarjet procedure after neurologic evaluation and treatment arrangement. Epileptic seizures after the operation and shoulder dislocation after a seizure were investigated. For functional evaluation, ROWE, ASES and constant scores were utilized, whereas standard X-Ray views were used for radiologic evaluation. The results of epileptic patients with Latarjet procedure were compared with non-epileptic patients (53 patients, 54 shoulders) for anterior shoulder instability. ResultsThree (33 %) of the 9 epileptic patients had recurrent seizures after Latarjet procedure, whereas 1 of the 11 shoulders (9 %) had dislocation after an epileptic seizure. Functional scores were found to be significantly improved in epileptic (P<0.001) and non- epileptic patients (P<0.001). No significant differences for functional results were found between epileptic and non-epileptic patients after Latarjet procedure for anterior instability (P>0.05). One shoulder of 11 in the patients with epilepsy group (9 %) and one shoulder of the 54 shoulders non-epileptic patients group (1.8 %) had a redislocation. The rate of postoperative redislocation was significantly higher in patients with epilepsy (P: 0.008). DiscussionEpileptic patients have a high rate of recurrent seizures even with proper medical treatment. Significant functional improvements and shoulder stability may be achieved after Latarjet procedure in epileptic patients. These functional results were comparable with those of non-epileptic patients with Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Level of evidenceIII (case-control study).

The effectiveness of the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability in patients with epilepsy

IntroductionPowerful contractions during epileptic seizures may cause shoulder dislocation and instability. The aim of the study is to evaluate the functional and radiographic results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder dislocation in patients with epilepsy and compare the functional results of these patients with the results of patients without epilepsy. HypothesisIs latarjet procedure effective in epileptic patients as non-epileptic patients with anterior shoulder instability? Material and methodEleven shoulders of 9 patients with epileptic seizures causing anterior shoulder instability were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had a Latarjet procedure after neurologic evaluation and treatment arrangement. Epileptic seizures after the operation and shoulder dislocation after a seizure were investigated. For functional evaluation, ROWE, ASES and Constant scores were utilized whereas standard X-ray views were used for radiologic evaluation. The results of epileptic patients with Latarjet procedure were compared with non-epileptic patients (53 patients, 54 shoulders) for anterior shoulder instability. ResultsThree (33%) of the 9 epileptic patients had recurrent seizures after Latarjet procedure, whereas 1 of the 11 shoulders (9%) had dislocation after an epileptic seizure. Functional scores were found to be significantly improved in epileptic (P<0.001) and non-epileptic patients (P<0.001). No significant differences for functional results were found between epileptic and non-epileptic patients after Latarjet procedure for anterior instability (P>0.05). One shoulder of 11 in the patients with epilepsy group (9%) and one shoulder of the 54 shoulders non-epileptic patients group (1.8%) had a redislocation. The rate of postoperative redislocation was significantly higher in patients with epilepsy (P=0.008). DiscussionEpileptic patients have a high rate of recurrent seizures even with proper medical treatment. Significant functional improvements and shoulder stability may be achieved after Latarjet procedure in epileptic patients. These functional results were comparable with those of non-epileptic patients with Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Level of evidenceIII (case-control study).

Contribution of osseous and muscular stabilizing effects with the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability without glenoid bone loss

The Latarjet procedure is used to treat anterior shoulder instability. Authors contend that the main concept of the operation is using the conjoined tendon as a sling to lower the subscapularis, reinforcing the anteroinferior capsule. The effects of the "sling," as well as stability and range of motion (ROM), after the Latarjet procedure have not been documented. In this study, we test the Latarjet procedure, attempting to account for the effect of the conjoined tendon. We also use the model to characterize the kinematic effects and stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure. Six cadaveric shoulders were tested in the intact state, after anterior capsulotomy, and after the Latarjet procedure. An apparatus was designed that allowed for loading of the conjoined tendon. ROM and translation were quantified. After conclusion of testing in the Latarjet group, the conjoined tendon was released and specimens were retested to determine stability attributable to the sling effect versus the osseous effect alone. We found no statistically significant differences with regard to ROM after the Latarjet procedure. The Latarjet procedure did significantly decrease anteroinferior translation. However, when the conjoined tendon was unloaded, there was a significantly decreased resistance to anterior translation. After conjoined tendon release, there was no effect on inferior translation. This study confirmed that the Latarjet procedure successfully decreases anteroinferior translation while maintaining ROM. It did not support the belief that inferior stability is provided by the sling effect. The model developed can serve as the basis for future testing. basic science study, biomechanics.