You have accessJournal of UrologyBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Surgical Therapy & New Technology III (PD18)1 Sep 2021PD18-03 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF OUTPATIENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC ENLARGEMENT IN NEW YORK STATE AND CALIFORNIA (2005-2016) Michelina Stoddard, Xinyan Zheng, Jialin Mao, Alexis Te, Art Sedrakyan, and Bilal Chughtai Michelina StoddardMichelina Stoddard More articles by this author , Xinyan ZhengXinyan Zheng More articles by this author , Jialin MaoJialin Mao More articles by this author , Alexis TeAlexis Te More articles by this author , Art SedrakyanArt Sedrakyan More articles by this author , and Bilal ChughtaiBilal Chughtai More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002007.03AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) and Laser prostatectomy (Laser) have become the gold standard for treatment of benign prostate enlargement (BPE). Randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of TURP versus Laser have shown that Laser was non-inferior to TURP with similar short-term durability. However, these studies were performed in high volume centers with expert surgeons and may not represent real-world outcomes. To understand the outcomes of TURP versus Laser in a generalized population, we sought to determine the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of TURP versus Laser in the outpatient setting using real-world data from two large states in the US. METHODS: We present a prospectively collected observational cohort study of 85,682 men with benign prostatic enlargement in New York State and California who received transurethral prostatectomy or laser prostatectomy in outpatient and ambulatory surgery settings from January 2005 to December 2016. We used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in patient characteristics between groups. We analyzed short-term outcomes using mixed-effect logistic regressions and long-term outcomes using Cox regressions with a time-dependent treatment variable to account for non-proportionality. We performed a sensitivity analysis using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Patients were aged 70.5±9.7 years (mean±SD) and mostly of white race (71%) with a median follow-up period of 3.8 (interquartile range 1.8—6.3) years. Relative to Laser recipients, TURP recipients had increased risks of 30-day hospital readmission/emergency room visit (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04—1.13, p<0.001); 90-day risks of urinary retention (OR 1.45, CI 1.28—1.65, p<0.001), and hematuria (OR 1.56, CI 1.29—1.89, p<0.001); and higher rate of urethral stricture within 6 months of the index procedure (hazard ratio (HR) 1.47, CI 1.22—1.75, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of UTI 90 days after the index procedure (OR 0.97, CI 0.85—1.11, p>0.05), and decreased long-term risk of reoperation (HR 0.81, CI 0.76—0.88, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TURP was associated with higher risk of short- and long-term complications, but a lower rate of long-term reoperation than Laser for BPE. Therefore, TURP may be more suitable for patients who are willing and/or able to tolerate more complications at the trade-off of lower risk of reoperation. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e356-e356 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michelina Stoddard More articles by this author Xinyan Zheng More articles by this author Jialin Mao More articles by this author Alexis Te More articles by this author Art Sedrakyan More articles by this author Bilal Chughtai More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Read full abstract