Laser Conization Research Articles

Cold Knife Versus Carbon Dioxide for the Treatment of Preinvasive Cervical Lesion.

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) represents a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for younger women. Cold knife (CK) conization and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser conization are two techniques commonly used to remove pre-invasive lesions, offering a potential curative intent in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC. This study aimed to assess the clinical implications and pathological outcomes of CK vs. CO2 laser conization for pre-invasive lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent CO2 or CK conization for high-grade preinvasive lesions (CIN2/3, CIS and AIS) between 2010 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details and pathological outcomes were collected. Pregnancy outcomes, including composite adverse obstetric rates, and oncological follow-up data, were also obtained. Results: In all, 1270 women were included; of them, 1225 (96.5%) underwent CO2, and 45 (3.5%) underwent CK conization. Overall, the rate of positive endocervical or deep margins was lower with CO2 laser compared to CK (4.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015). Incidental CC was diagnosed in 56 (4.4%) patients, with 35 (62.5%) squamous and 21 (46.6%) adenocarcinomas. In a multivariate regression model, the relative risk for positive endocervical or deep margins is significantly greater in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC (p < 0.01). In cases of incidental diagnosis of CC, we found that the probabilities of having either positive endocervical or deep margins after CO2 laser or CK conization are similar, with a higher risk in case of adenocarcinoma lesion. Among women with CC, 42 (75%) opted for radical treatment, while 14 (25%) underwent a follow-up. Only one woman (7.1%) in the follow-up group, who had undergone CK conization, experienced a composite adverse obstetric outcome. No recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 53 months. Conclusions: CO2 laser conization achieved a lower positive margin rate overall. CK and CO2 conization appear to be equivalent oncological options for incidental CC.

Treatment methods for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

To compare the cost-effectiveness of different treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). A cost-effectiveness analysis based on data available in the literature and expert opinion. England. Women treated for CIN. We developed a decision-analytic model to simulate the clinical course of 1000 women who received local treatment for CIN and were followed up for 10 years after treatment. In the model we considered surgical complications as well as oncological and reproductive outcomes over the 10-year period. The costs calculated were those incurred by the National Health Service (NHS) of England. Cost per one CIN2+ recurrence averted (oncological outcome); cost per one preterm birth averted (reproductive outcome); overall cost per one adverse oncological or reproductive outcome averted. For young women of reproductive age, large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) was the most cost-effective treatment overall at all willingness-to-pay thresholds. For postmenopausal women, LLETZ remained the most cost-effective treatment up to a threshold of £31,500, but laser conisation became the most cost-effective treatment above that threshold. LLETZ is the most cost-effective treatment for both younger and older women. However, for older women, more radical excision with laser conisation could also be considered if the NHS is willing to spend more than £31,500 to avert one CIN2+ recurrence.

Perinatalne komplikacije nakon ekscizionog lečenja cervikalne displazije

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women. Mass screenings have significantly decreased its incidence, while causing an increase in precancerous cervical lesions that are mainly diagnosed in women of reproductive age who still have not fulfilled their reproductive goals. The aim of surgical treatment of these premalignant lesions is to prevent the development of cervical cancer, with minimal risks to the reproductive function. The most important perinatal complication is preterm delivery, usually coupled with preterm premature rupture of the membranes and chorioamnionitis. This results in prematurity with low birth weights, which can further result in increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Data on the incidence of spontaneous miscarriages in treated women are non-consistent , however, it is believed that the incidence is higher in the second trimester. Possible predictors of complications are the amount of excised tissue, the type of excision technique, age at the time of surgery, and the length of the period between treatment and conception. Re-excision of the cervix is an additional risk factor for perinatal complications. The risk of perinatal complications is the highest after cold knife conization, followed by laser conization, whereas LEETZ excision means the lowest risk-this is primarily explained by the variations in the cone size. Having in mind that not all precancerous cervical lesions progress to cancer and that all types of excision treatments are associated with an increased incidence of perinatal complications, an adequate approach would entail primarily well-selected patients, i.e., treating only those women who are at real risk of developing cancer. The surgical treatment must be adapted to provide minimal risks for perinatal complications, maximal oncologic safety , and minimal risk of residual and/or recurring disease during a woman's lifespan.

Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The trade-off between comparative effectiveness and reproductive morbidity of different treatment methods for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the risks of treatment failure and preterm birth associated with various treatment techniques. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database for randomised and non-randomised studies reporting on oncological or reproductive outcomes after CIN treatments from database inception until March 9, 2022, without language restrictions. We included studies of women with CIN, glandular intraepithelial neoplasia, or stage IA1 cervical cancer treated with excision (cold knife conisation [CKC], laser conisation, and large loop excision of the transformation zone [LLETZ]) or ablation (radical diathermy, laser ablation, cold coagulation, and cryotherapy). We excluded women treated with hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were any treatment failure (defined as any abnormal histology or cytology) and preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation). The network for preterm birth also included women with untreated CIN (untreated colposcopy group). The main reference group was LLETZ for treatment failure and the untreated colposcopy group for preterm birth. For randomised controlled trials, we extracted group-level summary data, and for observational studies, we extracted relative treatment effect estimates adjusted for potential confounders, when available, and we did random-effects network meta-analyses to obtain odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. We assessed within-study and across-study risk of bias using Cochrane tools. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018115495 and CRD42018115508. 7880 potential citations were identified for the outcome of treatment failure and 4107 for the outcome of preterm birth. After screening and removal of duplicates, the network for treatment failure included 19 240 participants across 71 studies (25 randomised) and the network for preterm birth included 68 817 participants across 29 studies (two randomised). Compared with LLETZ, risk of treatment failure was reduced for other excisional methods (laser conisation: OR 0·59 [95% CI 0·44-0·79] and CKC: 0·63 [0·50-0·81]) and increased for laser ablation (1·69 [1·27-2·24]) and cryotherapy (1·84 [1·33-2·56]). No differences were found for the comparison of cold coagulation versus LLETZ (1·09 [0·68-1·74]) but direct data were based on two small studies only. Compared with the untreated colposcopy group, risk of preterm birth was increased for all excisional techniques (CKC: 2·27 [1·70-3·02]; laser conisation: 1·77 [1·29-2·43]; and LLETZ: 1·37 [1·16-1·62]), whereas no differences were found for ablative methods (laser ablation: 1·05 [0·78-1·41]; cryotherapy: 1·01 [0·35-2·92]; and cold coagulation: 0·67 [0·02-29·15]). The evidence was based mostly on observational studies with their inherent risks of bias, and the credibility of many comparisons was low. More radical excisional techniques reduce the risk of treatment failure but increase the risk of subsequent preterm birth. Although there is uncertainty, ablative treatments probably do not increase risk of preterm birth, but are associated with higher failure rates than excisional techniques. Although we found LLETZ to have balanced effectiveness and reproductive morbidity, treatment choice should rely on a woman's age, size and location of lesion, and future family planning. National Institute for Health and Care Research: Research for Patient Benefit.

Histopathological findings in hysterectomy for cervical stenosis in postmenopausal women: A retrospective case series.

Objective:To analyze the histopathological findings in postmenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for postsurgical cervical stenosis, evaluating the incidental findings of preinvasive or invasive uterine and cervical disease.Methods:Retrospective case series of postmenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for postsurgical cervical stenosis at Gynecological Oncology Unit of Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano—National Cancer Institute from January 2014 to January 2021.Results:During the study period, 36 women underwent hysterectomy for postsurgical cervical stenosis at our institution. Cervical stenosis occurred 10.2 ± 5.6 years from the onset of menopause. In particular, 26 (72.2%) patients underwent a single loop electrosurgical excision procedure or carbon dioxide (CO2)-laser conization before the onset of stenosis. The remaining 10 (27.8%) women had multiple surgical excision before the onset of stenosis. At the final histopathological analysis, 17 (47.2%) patients had a preinvasive or invasive gynecological disease. In particular, 9 cases of cervical disease (including 1 case of endocervical squamous cell carcinoma pT1a) and 6 cases of endometrial hyperplasia emerged. Also, 2 cases of tubo-ovarian diseases were found.Conclusions:Postsurgical cervical stenosis is a challenging clinical condition, especially in women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or microinvasive cervical cancer. As shown, cervical stenosis can prevent an adequate gynecological follow-up and a prompt diagnosis of malignancies. Therefore, postmenopausal women with cervical stenosis should be carefully counseled, and hysterectomy could be a reasonable option, especially in those cases in which a conservative approach is not feasible, failed, or is not accepted by the patient.

Laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Effectiveness and obstetric outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and obstetric outcomes after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. MethodsThis retrospective study included 757 patients who underwent laser conization between 2014 and 2020. Patients with a diagnosis of invasive lesions or adenocarcinoma in situ were excluded. Histological data from the conization specimen, pre and postoperative histological and virological data (Human PapillomaVirus (HPV) test) and obstetric outcomes were collected from the medical record. The primary endpoint was the negative surgical margin rates after laser conization. The secondary endpoint were the size of the operative specimen, the postoperative virological test results (3 to 6 months after surgery), factors associated with negative or positive margin and postoperative obstetric outcomes (prematurity). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared using Student's t-test, χ² test, or Fisher exact test. Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. ResultsThis study included 757 patients. Negative surgical margins were obtained in 76.1% of the cases and were associated with more negative HPV tests at 6 months (64.9% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.006) and fewer repeat surgeries (0.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.013) than for patients with positive margins. Among the patients under 43 years at the time of conization, 71 achieved a pregnancy with a term >22 weeks, and of these 66 (93%) delivered at term (≥37 weeks). ConclusionLaser conization appears to be an effective technique for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia both in terms of the quality of the resection margins and the obstetric prognosis.

Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study

ObjectiveConization aims to remove pre-neoplastic lesions of the uterine cervix. Several techniques for conization have been compared, but evidence regarding the most effective therapeutic option is scant. Here, we aimed to compare the recurrence rate following laser conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with high-grade cervical dysplasia (HSIL/CIN2+). MethodsThis is a retrospective multi-institutional study. Medical records of consecutive patients with HSIL/CIN2+ undergoing conization between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved. A propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied in order to reduce allocation bias. The risk of developing recurrence was estimated using Kaplan-Meir and Cox hazard models. ResultsOverall, 2966 patients had conization over the study period, including 567 (20%) and 2399 (80%) patients having laser conization and LEEP, respectively. Looking at predictors of recurrence, diagnosis of CIN3 (HR:3.80 (95%CI:2.01,7.21); p < 0.001) and HPV persistence (HR:1.81 (95%CI:1.11,2.96); p < 0.001) correlated with an increased risk of recurrence. After applying a PSM we selected 500 patients undergoing laser conization and 1000 undergoing LEEP. Patients undergoing LEEP were at higher risk of having positive surgical margins in comparison to patients undergoing laser conization (11.2% vs. 4.2%). The risk of having persistence of HPV was similar between the two groups (15.0% vs. 11.6%;p = 0.256). Five-year recurrence rate was 8.1% and 4% after LEEP and laser conization, respectively (p = 0.023). HPV persistence was the only factor associated with [5-]year recurrence after both laser conization (p = 0.003) and LEEP (p = 0.001). ConclusionsHPV persistence is the only factor associated with an increased risk of recurrence after either laser conization or LEEP. Owing to the lack of data regarding obstetrical outcomes, we are not able to assess the best therapeutic option for women with cervical dysplasia.

Obstetric outcomes in patients who have undergone excisional treatment for high-grade cervical squamous intra-epithelial neoplasia

ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationships between excisional treatment for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) and obstetric outcomes in terms of preterm delivery risk, premature rupture of membrane (PROM) and type of delivery, and between pre-term delivery and the type of excisional technique (radio frequency excision, laser conization). MethodsThis was a retrospective study of the obstetric outcomes of 2316 women aged 25–45 years who underwent excisional treatment for CIN2+ at the Obstetric and Gynecological Clinic of Ospedale Maggiore della Carità in Novara and at the Obstetric and Gynecological Department of Ospedale Sant’Anna in Torino in the period 2005–2014 and were evaluated until April 2016, and 57,937 untreated women of the same age, from the same centers. ResultsAfter treatment, 320 women had at least one pregnancy leading to delivery after a mean of 3.35 years. Treatment significantly increased the risk of preterm delivery. Compared with no treatment, the risk of preterm birth was higher in women who had undergone treatment (33.13% vs. 6.60%). Techniques removing or ablating more tissue, such as large loop excision of the transformation zone, were associated with worse outcomes (OR 2.96, 95% IC 1.72–5.10).Smoking habits significantly increase the risk of preterm delivery in the treated women (OR 2.82, 95% IC 1.61–4.9).The risk of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) (40% vs. 23.22%), the risk of preterm PROM (pPROM) (13.13% vs. 2.71%) and dystocic births (18.75% vs 4.48%) were also significantly increased after treatment.Caesarean sections were less frequent among the treated women (15.94% vs. 32.41%). ConclusionsOur findings reveal a relationship between cervical excisional treatment and pre-term delivery, PROM, and the method of delivery. In order to minimise risk and guarantee the best obstetric outcome, patient treatment and follow-up should be personalised.

Artificial intelligence estimates the impact of human papillomavirus types in influencing the risk of cervical dysplasia recurrence: progress toward a more personalized approach.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the pretreatment human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype might predict the risk of cervical dysplasia persistence/recurrence. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive 5104 women who underwent the HPV-DNA test were matched with retrospective data of women undergoing either follow-up or medical/surgical treatment(s) for genital HPV-related infection(s). Artificial neuronal network (ANN) analysis was used in order to weight the importance of different HPV genotypes in predicting cervical dysplasia persistence/recurrence. ANN simulates a biological neuronal system from both the structural and functional points of view: like neurons, ANN acquires knowledge through a learning-phase process and allows weighting the importance of covariates, thus establishing how much a variable influences a multifactor phenomenon. Overall, 5104 women were tested for HPV. Among them, 1273 (25%) patients underwent treatment for HPV-related disorders. LASER conization and cervical vaporization were performed in 807 (59%) and 386 (30%) patients, respectively, and secondary cervical conization in 45 (5.5%). ANN technology showed that the most important genotypes predicting cervical dysplasia persistence/recurrence were HPV-16 (normalized importance: 100%), HPV-59 (normalized importance: 51.2%), HPV-52 (normalized importance: 47.7%), HPV-18 (normalized importance: 32.8%) and HPV-45 (normalized importance: 30.2%). The pretreatment diagnosis of all of those genotypes, except HPV-45, correlated with an increased risk of cervical dysplasia persistence/recurrence; the pretreatment diagnosis was also arrived at using standard univariate and multivariable models (P<0.01). Pretreatment positivity for HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-52 and HPV-59 might correlate with an increased risk of cervical dysplasia persistence/recurrence after treatment. These data might be helpful during patients' counseling and to implement new vaccination programs.

Excision of the transformation zone: a comparison between large loop excision of the transformation zone, needle excision of the transformation zone, and laser conization

Objective: To compare three methods of excision of the transformation zone (ETZ). Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study, comparing three techniques of ETZ: LASER CO2, large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), and needle excision of the transformation zone (NETZ) in a cervical pathology unit between January 2016 and July 2017. Material and methods: Data files were consulted and complemented with the institutional medical record SClinico®. The characteristics of the women and the specimen cone were obtained. The complications of the procedures and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were assessed. Statistical analyses were achieved using SPSS® 25 software. Results: During the target period, 201 of women were subjected to LASER CO2, 85 to LLETZ, and 15 to NETZ. The excisional specimens obtained did not show statistical differences in resection margin status and thermal artifacts. On average, only LASER ETZ obtained deeper excisional specimens compared to the other two techniques. During the procedures, NETZ showed a more significant bleeding risk compared to LASER ETZ (RR 0.29, 95%CI 0.09-0.93) and LLETZ (RR 0.17, 95%CI 0.05-0.65). NETZ also presented a 20% higher incidence of postoperative complications. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the women who underwent NETZ showed greater risk of maintaining cytological abnormalities and/or high risk-HPV at the 6th- and 12th-month follow-ups. Conclusion: There is no clear evidence of the best ETZ technique, but it seems that the LASER and LLETZ methods are both safe and effective options in ETZ.

Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists.

Surgical smoke is the gaseous by-product produced by heat generating devices in various surgical operations including laser conization and loop electrosurgical procedures that often are performed by gynecologists. Surgical smoke contains chemicals, blood and tissue particles, bacteria, and viruses, which has been shown to exhibit potential risks for surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists, and technicians in the operation room due to long term exposure of smoke. In this review, we describe the detailed information of the components of surgical smoke. Moreover, we highlight the effects of surgical smoke on carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, and infection in gynecologists. Furthermore, we discussed how to prevent the surgical smoke via using high-filtration masks and smoke evacuation systems as well as legal guidelines for protection measures among the gynecologists.

Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis

To assess the effect of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome, a literature search strategy was conducted to identify all of the references lists of the relevant studies. The fixed or random effect model was used to calculate pooled RRs on the basis of heterogeneity. Twenty-seven publications with n cases and m controls were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that conisation was associated with a higher risk of a preterm delivery (p = .010), PROM (p = .008), and a lower birth weight (p < .001) in overall effect. The subgroup analysis showed that CKC was associated with a significantly increased risk of a preterm delivery (p < .001), and a lower birth weight (p< .001). LLETZ was associated with preterm delivery (p = .004) and a lower birth weight (p = .020). The results suggested that cervical conisation increases the risk of a preterm delivery, PROM, and a lower birth weight, especially in a CKC and LLEETZ procedure.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Currently, the three main excisional procedures for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment are laser conisation, cold-knife conisation (CKC), and a large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). CKC and LEEP/LLETZ were significantly associated with a preterm delivery and low birth weight, and that former was associated with higher relative risks than the latter one.What do the results of this study add? The present results showed that conisation was associated with a higher risk of a preterm delivery, PROM, and a lower birth weight in overall effect. A subgroup analysis showed that CKC was associated with a significantly increased risk of a preterm delivery, and a lower birth weight. LLETZ was associated with a preterm delivery and lower birth weight.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study is of clinical significance by showing that cervical conisation increases the risk of preterm delivery, PROM, and a lower birth weight, especially in a CKC and a LLEETZ procedure.

Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incomplete excision of cervical precancer is associated with therapeutic failure and is therefore considered as a quality indicator of clinical practice. Conversely, the risk of preterm birth is reported to correlate with size of cervical excision and therefore balancing the risk of adequate treatment with iatrogenic harm is challenging. We reviewed the literature with an aim to reveal whether incomplete excision, reflected by presence of precancerous tissue at the section margins, or post-treatment HPV testing are accurate predictors of treatment failure. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of therapeutic failure associated with the histological status of the margins of the tissue excised to treat cervical precancer. We estimated the accuracy of the margin status to predict occurrence of residual or recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade two or worse (CIN2+) and compared it with post-treatment high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. We searched for published systematic reviews and new references from PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL and did also a new search spanning the period Jan 1, 1975, until Feb 1, 2016. Studies were eligible if women underwent treatment by excision of a histologically confirmed CIN2+ lesion, with verification of presence or absence of CIN at the resection margins; were tested by cytology or HPV assay between 3 months and 9 months after treatment; and had subsequent follow-up of at least 18 months post-treatment including histological confirmation of the occurrence of CIN2+. Primary endpoints were the proportion of positive section margins and the occurrence of treatment failure associated with the marginal status, in which treatment failure was defined as occurrence of residual or recurrent CIN2+. Information about positive resection margins and subsequent treatment failure was pooled using procedures for meta-analysis of binomial data and analysed using random-effects models. 97 studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis and included 44 446 women treated for cervical precancer. The proportion of positive margins was 23·1% (95% CI 20·4-25·9) overall and varied by treatment procedure (ranging from 17·8% [12·9-23·2] for laser conisation to 25·9% [22·3-29·6] for large loop excision of the transformation zone) and increased by the severity of the treated lesion. The overall risk of residual or recurrent CIN2+ was 6·6% (95% CI 4·9-8·4) and was increased with positive compared with negative resection margins (relative risk 4·8, 95% CI 3·2-7·2). The pooled sensitivity and specificity to predict residual or recurrent CIN2+ was 55·8% (95% CI 45·8-65·5) and 84·4% (79·5-88·4), respectively, for the margin status, and 91·0% (82·3-95·5) and 83·8% (77·7-88·7), respectively, for high-risk HPV testing. A negative high-risk HPV test post treatment was associated with a risk of CIN2+ of 0·8%, whereas this risk was 3·7% when margins were free. The risk of residual or recurrent CIN2+ is significantly greater with involved margins on excisional treatment; however, high-risk HPV post-treatment predicts treatment failure more accurately than margin status. European Federation for Colposcopy and Institut national du Cancer (INCA).

Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.

Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

To explore associations between specific treatments for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We conducted a population-based cohort study in which treatment data from the Cancer Registry of Norway were linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway to identify adverse pregnancy outcomes. All women (n=545,243) with singleton births (N=943,321) in Norway during 1998-2014 were included; 9,554 of births were in women treated before delivery. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from Cox regression models. There was a significant association between preterm birth and previous treatment of cervical lesions overall (9.7 compared with 5.3%; HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-2.0). The strongest associations were seen for cold knife (13 compared with 5.3%; HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.3) and laser conization (12 compared with 5.3%; HR 2.3, 95% CI 2.0-2.5). The association was stronger for preterm birth at earlier gestational ages and increased with amount of tissue excised. Furthermore, the association weakened with calendar year of treatment. There was also an association with increased risks of spontaneous abortion (0.5 compared with 0.2%; HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.7), and the strongest associations were seen for laser conization (0.6 compared with 0.2%; HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.8-5.3) and a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) (0.4 compared with 0.2%; HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0). Treatment with major excisional procedures, including LEEP, was associated with increased risks of preterm birth and spontaneous abortion. The risk of preterm birth was highest at early gestational ages and for those with the largest amount of tissue excised. Women should be informed about their future risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly preterm birth, after excisional treatment for cervical lesions.

Virological and cytological clearance in laser vaporization and conization for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 3.

Cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) is the precancerous stage of cervical cancer. Standard treatment for high-grade CIN is conization of the cervix. The risk of preterm birth following conization has been discussed recently. In contrast, laser vaporization is believed not to affect perinatal outcome, but the long-term effectiveness of each surgical procedure is still unclear. The aim of this prospective unmatched-cohort study was therefore to compare virological and cytological clearance and recurrence risk between conization and vaporization for CIN3. Subject consisted of CIN3 patients treated at the present hospital between 2007 to 2011 and followed up until December 2014. One hundred and one patients were treated with laser conization, and 137 with vaporization. The surgical procedure was selected on the basis of colposcopy, pathological grade and patient's hope for pregnancy. There were no significant differences in cure rate, human papilloma virus (HPV) clearance rate or recurrence rates between the conization and vaporization groups. Risk ratio of recurrence for each surgical procedure adjusted for age and HPV persistence status were analyzed on Cox proportional hazards modeling. Recurrence risk ratio for patients treated by vaporization was 6.21 (95%CI: 0.65-59.19; P = 0.111) compared with conization and there were no significant differences. No adverse pregnancy outcome was observed in the vaporization group compared with conization. Laser vaporization is useful for young patients with CIN3 who hope for pregnancy in the future.

Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To assess the effect of treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on obstetric outcomes and to correlate this with cone depth and comparison group used.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data...

How do laser ablation and conization compare with each other or alternative surgical techniques in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?

How do laser ablation and conization compare with each other or alternative surgical techniques in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?

The problems of cervical conization for postmenopausal patients.

Cervical conization is the definitive treatment for women of any age who have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). However, complications of the procedure have not been fully investigated in postmenopausal patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results and complications of cervical conization performed on premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. This study recruited 405 patients who had undergone cervical laser conization. The median age was 36 years (range 20 to 75), and there were 361 (89.1%) premenopausal and 44 (10.9%) postmenopausal women. The length of the cone removed from the postmenopausal patients was significantly longer than the length from the premenopausal patients (17.9 ± 3.9 mm vs. 15.7 ± 3.6 mm, respectively; p = 0.02). The rate of positive endocervical cone margins from the premenopausal patients was significantly higher than the rate from the postmenopausal patients (9.1% vs. 0%, respectively; p = 0.037). The rate of cervical stenosis was significantly higher in postmenopausal patients than in premenopausal patients (59.1% vs. 8.3%; respectively; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the rates of frequency of intraoperative complications. Although deep incision is mandatory for complete excision of CIN in postmenopausal patients, it increases the incidence of cervical stenosis. Cervical conization may be a less invasive surgical procedure for older women with CIN than hysterectomy; however, the risk of postoperative complications remains, causing a dilemma for physicians treating postmenopausal women with CIN.

Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after "coin-shaped" conization.

Uterine cervical conization is related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. To deal with this problem, we started conservative coin-shaped conization for reproductive-aged patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Here we report both the obstetrical and oncological impacts of this operation in comparison with the standard cone-shaped resection. A total of 401 women 44 years old or younger were treated in our hospital by CO2 laser conization between 2003 and 2012, and subsequently 50 patients became pregnant. The patients were divided into two groups, a standard cone-shaped conization group (until 2008) and a shallow coin-shaped conization group (beginning in 2008). The pregnancy courses and oncological prognoses of these two groups were studied. Cone height reduction of about 3 mm was done. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the occurrence of oncological complications. In the standard conization group, 18 of the 25 patients delivered at term. In the coin-shaped conization group, 20 of the 25 patients delivered at term. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the occurrence of various obstetrical complications. However, the reduction rate of cervical length over the pregnancy was smaller in the coin-shaped group and the number of patients with a short cervix length of 2 cm or less was smaller in the coin-shaped group. Although conservative coin-shaped conization did not markedly improve the obstetrical prognosis, this operative procedure improved the reduction rate of uterine cervical length over the pregnancy without any increase in oncological complications.