Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis Group Research Articles

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This was a retrospective case series study. Patients who had completed 1-year follow-up after receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, or LASEK at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021 were included. Pentacam pachymetry was performed to measure the CCT. The predicted CCT reduction was obtained through laser platform. The measured CCT reduction was defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative CCT using Pentacam pachymetry. There were 100 eyes treated by SMILE, 100 eyes by FS-LASIK, and 100 eyes by LASEK. There was a significant difference in predicted CCT reduction among the three surgeries (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in measured CCT reduction postoperatively (PGroup = 0.373). At 1year postoperatively, the CCT reduction was overestimated by 17.85 ± 5.36µm in the SMILE group, underestimated by 4.31 ± 7.08µm in the FS-LASIK group, and underestimated by 7.60 ± 8.28µm in the LASEK group (PGroup < 0.001, PTime < 0.001). In the FS-LASIK group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction was not related to the predicted CCT reduction (P = 0.095). The laser platform may overestimate the CCT reduction for SMILE and underestimate it for FS-LASIK and LASEK. FS-LASIK has a much higher level of accuracy in CCT reduction, which is not influenced by refractive correction.

Refractive Outcomes of Combined LASEK and Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking for Moderate Myopia

Purpose: We compared 1 year refractive outcomes between combined laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and accelerated collagen cross linking (CXL LASEK), and LASEK alone.Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective analysis including 166 eyes of 83 moderate myopia patients who underwent CXL LASEK, and 146 eyes of 73 moderate myopia patients underwent LASEK alone. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), keratometry were evaluated preoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.Results: There was significant difference of preoperative SE (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.05), UDVA (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference of preoperative flat K (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.10) and steep K (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.18) between the two groups. At the 1-year follow-up, the SE was ± 0.25 diopter (D) in 80.5% of the CXL LASEK patients and 59.7% of the LASEK patients (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.05). There was significant difference between the SE (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.05), flat K (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.02) and steep K (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.05) rates over time between the two groups. After removing the preoperative results, there was no significant difference between the SE (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.45) over time between the two groups.Conclusions: The postoperative refractive stability of the CXL LASEK group was confirmed.

In vivo confocal microscopy of sub-basal corneal nerves and corneal densitometry after three kinds of refractive procedures for high myopia.

To observe corneal nerve fibers and densitometry after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia. This is a prospective, cross-sectional research study. Patients with high myopia (equivalent spherical lens: -6.00 and -11.00D) who underwent laser corneal refractive surgery were divided into three groups: SMILE, FS-LASIK and LASEK. Scheimpflug imaging of corneal nerves in five areas was observed by confocal microscopy before and 6, 12months after surgery. Corneal densitometry was measured by Pentacam anterior segment analysis system. Overall, 59 patients were enrolled. The nerve density in the central area did not recover to the preoperative level in three groups until 12months. The density and length of corneal nerves in central and lower area were better in the SMILE group 6months postoperatively (p = 0.01), while nerve density did not differ significantly among three groups 12months postoperatively (p = 0.18). Nerve fibers in central and temporal region were wider in LASEK than that in other two groups at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Corneal densitometry in the central 6mm diameter was significantly higher in the LASEK group compared with other two groups 6months postoperatively (p = 0.04). Twelvemonths postoperatively, corneal densitometry in range of all zone was lower in SMILE than in FS-LASIK and LASEK (p = 0.01, 0.03, 0.04). Compared with FS-LASIK and LASEK, SMILE-treated eyes with high myopia had certain advantages in nerve density, length and nerve connection way and had better corneal transparency after operation.

Long-term visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia

BackgroundFew studies have reported the visual outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This study aims to compare the visual quality and corneal wavefront aberrations after SMILE and LASEK for low-myopia correction.MethodsIn this prospective study, we included 29 eyes of 29 patients who received SMILE and 23 eyes of 23 patients who received LASEK between June 2018 and January 2019. The following measurements were assessed: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal wavefront aberrations, and subjective visual quality. All patients were followed up for two years.ResultsAll procedures were uneventful. An efficacy index of 1.19 ± 0.17 was established in the SMILE group and 1.23 ± 0.20 in the LASEK group. No eyes lost more than two lines of CDVA. We found that 93% (27/29) of the treated eyes in the SMILE group and 91% (21/23) in the LASEK group had spherical equivalent (SE) within ± 0.25D. The increases in the total corneal spherical aberration and the corneal front spherical aberration were lower in the SMILE group than in the LASEK group (P < 0.01). In contrast, the increases in the total corneal vertical coma and the corneal front vertical coma in the SMILE group were greater than those in the LASEK group (P < 0.01).ConclusionBoth SMILE and LASEK have good safety, stability, and patient-reported satisfaction for low myopia. SMILE induced less corneal spherical aberration but greater vertical coma than LASEK.

Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia.

The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative corneal biomechanics and assess the influence factors after femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia. In this retrospective study, patients who completed 1-year follow-up were included. The corneal biomechanical parameters, including deformation amplitude ratio 2.0 mm (DA ratio 2.0 mm), integrated inverse radius (IntInv Rad), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), and Ambrosio relational thickness through the horizontal meridian (ARTh), were measured with Corvis STII. We also investigated the relationship between these biomechanics and preoperative or intraoperative variables. Thirty eyes had FS-LASIK and 30 eyes had LASEK. The changes in DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, and SP-A1 after surgery were significantly smaller in the LASEK group than in the FS-LASIK group, while the change in the ARTh was not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were detected in the mean values of postoperative DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, and SP-A1 between LASEK and FS-LASIK, while significant difference was detected in the mean value of postoperative ARTh. There was a significant correlation between the resident stromal bed thickness and the postoperative DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, or SP-A1. The postoperative ARTh has shown significant correlation with postoperative central corneal thickness and the amount of myopic correction. The effect of LASEK on corneal biomechanics was smaller than FS-LASIK when the same central corneal thickness was consumed. LASEK may be performed with a lower risk of postoperative corneal ectasia than FS-LASIK.

Visual outcomes after three different surgical procedures for correction of refractive error in patients with thin corneas.

To investigate and compare the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), laser assisted sub-epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), and LASEK combined with corneal collagen cross-linking (LASEK-CXL) surgery in patients with less than 500 µm of central corneal thickness (CCT). The retrospective medical records review was conducted on the patients with CCT less than 500 µm treated with SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK-CXL. There was a total of 172 eyes, 76 eyes were in the SMILE group, 53 eyes in the LASEK group, and 43 eyes in the LASEK-CXL group. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent refraction (SE), and corneal haze were followed up in the three groups for 12mo. At 12mo postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in UDVA and in the absolute value of SE between the three groups. The predictability within ±0.50 D in the SMILE group (85.5%) was significantly higher than in both the LASEK group (64.2%, P<0.01) and the LASEK-CXL group (69.8%, P=0.04). The efficacy index and safety index were not significantly different among the three groups. Corneal haze at 12mo postoperatively was higher in the LASEK-CXL group (27.9%) than in the SMILE group (2.6%, P<0.01) and in the LASEK group (7.5%, P<0.01). In patients with CCT less than 500 µm, SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK-CXL appear to be effective for myopic correction. Among them, SMILE surgery shows the highest predictability.

Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia

ABSTRACTPurpose: To determine the predictive factors of postoperative myopic regression in subjects who have undergone laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with flaps created using a mechanical microkeratome (MM) or LASIK with flaps created using a femtosecond (FS) laser for −0.50 D to −6.0 D myopia.Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective comparison. We included 236 eyes in the LASEK group, 1,178 eyes in the MM-LASIK group and 1,333 eyes in the FS-LASIK group. Refractive outcomes were recorded at one day; one week; and one, three, six and 12 months postoperatively. Predictors affecting myopic regression and other covariates were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model for the three methods of surgery.Results: At 12 months, the survival rates (no myopic regression) were 63.36%, 74% and 77% in the MM-LASIK, LASEK, and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. Risk factors for myopic regression were indicated for patients with greater preoperative central corneal thicknesses (CCT) (P = .02), female patients (P < .01), patients with aspherical ablations (P = .01) and those with larger transitional zones (TZ) (P < .01). Among the three surgeries, MM-LASIK had a significantly higher probability of postoperative myopic regression (P < .01). Longer durations of myopia (P = .03), steeper corneal curvatures (Kmax) (P < .01) and larger optical zones (OZ) (P < .01) were protective factors.Conclusion: MM-LASIK had the highest risk for myopic regression. OZ, TZ, aspherical ablations, preoperative corneal curvatures and being a female patient had significant influence on myopic regression in −0.50 D to −6.0 D myopia.

Predictors affecting myopic regression in \u2212\u20096.0D to \u2212\u200910.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted

PurposeTo investigate the predictive factors of postoperative myopic regression among subjects who have undergone laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap created with a mechanical microkeratome (MM), and LASIK flap created with a femtosecond laser (FS). All recruited patients had a manifest spherical equivalence (SE) from − 6.0D to − 10.0D myopia.MethodsThis retrospective, observational case series study analyzed outcomes of refraction at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Predictors affecting myopic regression and other covariates were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model for the three types of surgeries.ResultsThe study enrolled 496 eyes in the LASEK group, 1054 eyes in the FS-LASIK group, and 910 eyes in the MM-LASIK group. At 12 months, from − 6.0D to − 10.0D myopia showed that the survival rates (no myopic regression) were 52.19%, 59.12%, and 58.79% in the MM-LASIK, FS-LASIK, and LASEK groups, respectively. Risk factors for myopic regression included thicker postoperative central corneal thickness (P ≦ 0.01), older age (P ≦ 0.01), aspherical ablation (P = 0.02), and larger transitional zone (TZ) (P = 0.03). Steeper corneal curvature (Kmax) (P = 0.01), thicker preoperative central corneal thickness (P < 0.01), smaller preoperative myopia (P < 0.01), longer duration of myopia (P = 0.02), with contact lens (P < 0.01), and larger optical zone (OZ) (P = 0.02) were protective factors. Among the three groups, the MM-LASIK had the highest risk of postoperative myopic regression (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThe MM-LASIK group experienced the highest myopic regression, followed by the FS-LASIK and LASEK groups. Older age, aspheric ablation used, thicker postoperative central corneal thickness, and enlarging TZ contribute to myopic regression; steeper preoperative corneal curvature (Kmax), longer duration of myopia, with contact lens, thicker preoperative central corneal thickness, lower manifest refraction SE, and enlarging OZ prevent postoperative myopic regression in myopia from − 6.0D to − 10.0D.

Comparison of the posterior corneal elevation and biomechanics after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short- and long-term observation

PurposeThis study compares the posterior corneal elevation and corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction in a short- and long-term observation.MethodsThis prospective study included 32 patients in the SMILE group and 32 patients in the LASEK group. Corneal posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior mean elevation (PME), corneal back power (Kb), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were evaluated with Pentacam, and intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were evaluated with the ORA at pre-operation and 3 months and 3 years post-operation.ResultsThree months post-operatively, CH, CRF, and IOP decreased significantly and central posterior surface shifted backward in both groups (p < 0.05). CH was lower in the LASEK group (p = 0.03) and change of CH and CRF per unit corneal tissue removed (ΔCH/ablation depth (AD) and ΔCRF/AD) was lower in SMILE than in LASEK (p = 0.01, 0.03). Three years post-operatively, the PME shifted more posteriorly in LASEK (p = 0.04), but was stable in SMILE (p = 0.06). Kb flattened and ACD was shallower in both groups (compared to preoperative data, p < 0.001). CH in the LASEK group increased and is comparable to that in the SMILE group at 3 years post-operative.ConclusionBoth SMILE and LASEK can change the posterior surface and corneal biomechanics. SMILE may have less influence on corneal biomechanics than LASEK at an early stage post-operative in terms of per unit corneal tissue removed, but the effect became comparable in a long-term observation.

Effects of Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness and Blinking Pattern on Tear Film Instability After Corneal Refractive Surgery.

To investigate associations between changes in tear film instability and the lipid layer thickness (LLT) and blink pattern after corneal refractive surgery (CRS). Forty patients were enrolled in this study. The LLT and blink pattern were evaluated 1 week before and 30 days after CRS using a novel interferometer and an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, and other tear film stability markers were also evaluated. Mean OSDI scores increased from 5.52 to 8.54 (P = 0.016), corneal fluorescence staining scores increased from 0.05 to 0.25 (P = 0.034), first noninvasive tear breakup time (NIBUT-F) decreased from 9.66 to 7.33 seconds (P = 0.014), and average noninvasive tear breakup time (NIBUT-Ave) decreased from 12.32 to 10.26 seconds (P = 0.047) 1 month after CRS. Meanwhile, mean total blink frequency in 20 seconds decreased significantly from 12.62 to 6.31 (P < 0.001); LLT did not change significantly (P = 0.447). The change in NIBUT-Ave was positively correlated with that in LLT (P = 0.003) and negatively correlated with that in the partial blink rate (P = 0.013). The changes in the OSDI questionnaire, NIBUT, LLT, and blink pattern were not different between the laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis groups. A decrease in tear film stability occurs 1 month after CRS, the change in the blink pattern and unchanged LLT preoperatively and postoperatively suggesting that these parameters play a role in maintaining tear film stability after CRS.

Femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis to correct myopic astigmatism

PurposeTo compare femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis (FSBK) versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) to correct moderate to high myopic astigmatism. MethodsRetrospective, nonrandomized, interventional, comparative case series. A total of eight hundred and fifty-two eyes with myopic astigmatism of −1.5 diopters (D) or higher were included in the study. We compared 427 eyes treated with FSBK versus 425 eyes treated with LASEK with or without mitomycin C. Visual and refractive results were evaluated 1 day, 1 week, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. ResultsSix months postoperatively, the residual spherical defect was slightly but significantly higher in the LASEK group (+0.15±0.62D) than in the FSBK group (+0.09±0.35D) (P=0.05). The postoperative residual astigmatism was also slightly but significantly higher in the LASEK group (−0.38±0.52D) than in the FSBK group (−0.26±0.45D) (P=0.0005). No significant differences were found in the efficacy (0.98±0.17 versus 0.98±0.36, P=0.6) and safety indexes (1.04±0.16 versus 1.05±0.37, P=0.1) between FSBK and LASEK. The enhancement rate was significantly higher in the FSBK group (22.6%) than in the LASEK group (15.5%) (P=0.01). ConclusionsBoth FSBK and LASEK are safe and effective procedures to correct moderate to high myopic astigmatism. Slightly better visual and refractive results were observed in FSBK-treated eyes in a 6-month follow-up.

Characteristics of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment After Refractive Surgery: Comparison With Myopic Eyes With Retinal Detachment

To evaluate the characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) in patients with previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and compare them to RD in patients with previous laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and myopic patients with no previous refractive surgery. Retrospective, comparative case series. In 106 eyes of 106 patients with RD, patients with previous refractive surgery included 21 eyes after LASIK and 13 eyes after LASEK; 72 myopic patients with refractive errors of -3.0 diopters or less were grouped as the R (-) group. Characteristics of RD included distribution of RD and associated retinal breaks, location and number of retinal breaks, presence of lattice degeneration, and axial lengths. The mean interval between refractive surgery and the onset of rhegmatogenous RD was 63.7 ± 43.5 months, occurring across a broad spectrum of time intervals. There were no significant differences among the LASIK group, the LASEK group, and the R (-) group in axial length (26.8 mm vs 26.4 mm vs 26.9 mm, respectively); in mean number of retinal holes/tears, (2.1/1.5, 0.9/1.4, 1.5/1.6, respectively); or in the presence of lattice degeneration (52.4% vs 46.2% vs 43.1%, respectively). Distribution of RD and associated retinal breaks were also not significantly different; retinal holes and tears were more prevalent in the temporal quadrants, and inferotemporal quadrants were the most commonly detached areas in both the LASEK and LASIK groups and in the R (-) group. Myopia is a well-known risk factor for rhegmatogenous RD and may contribute more to the development of RD in myopic patients after refractive surgery, rather than refractive surgery itself.

Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: Mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser

To evaluate epithelial healing, postoperative pain, and visual and refractive outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using three epithelial removal techniques. Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial. Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine and Balgensesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, Korea. For the PRK procedure, the corneal epithelium was removed in one of three ways: mechanically (conventional PRK [PRK]) in 88 eyes of 44 patients; using excimer laser (transepithelial PRK [tPRK]) in 106 eyes of 53 patients; or using 20% diluted alcohol, laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) in 106 eyes of 53 patients. Epithelial healing, postoperative pain, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and remaining refractive error. The mean postoperative pain scores were 4.84 +/- 1.45 for PRK, 4.71 +/- 1.62 for tPRK, and 4.63 +/- 1.52 for LASEK (P = .125). The mean epithelial healing rates were 12.3 +/- 4.6 for PRK, 15.2 +/- 4.9 for tPRK, and 18.1 +/- 5.2 mm2/day for LASEK (P < .001). The postoperative 6-month remaining mean spherical equivalents (diopters) were -0.46 +/- 1.01 for PRK, 0.18 +/- 0.91 for tPRK, and -0.82 +/- 1.18 for LASEK (P = .01). The LASEK group showed less favorable UCVA than other groups. There was no significant difference in BSCVA between the groups. Postoperative pain, subepithelial opacity and BSCVA were similar regardless of the epithelial removal procedure. A faster epithelial healing rate did not result in better visual or refractive outcomes. Using the same nomogram, tPRK resulted in a slight overcorrection, and LASEK resulted in a slight undercorrection.