Laryngeal Mask Airway Fastrach Research Articles

Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster® versus Fastrach® LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial.

Background and Aims:BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway, a newer supraglottic airway device, is claimed to be an efficient conduit for endotracheal intubation. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an established device for the same. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate the success rate of blind intubation using either of these LMAs.Methods:Sixty patients of age group 20-60 years undergoing general anaesthesia were randomised in 2 groups, of 30 patients each, for tracheal intubation using either BlockBuster® LMA (Group B) or the Intubating LMA Fastrach® (Group F). After induction of anaesthesia, LMAs were inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, fibreoptic scopy was performed to assess the glottis visualisation score. Blind intubation was attempted through the supraglottic airway devices (SAD). The primary objective was first pass successful intubation and secondary outcomes were ease, time for LMA insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), LMA removal time, fibreoptic scoring and complications. Data was analysed using SPSS V22 software.Results:The first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was 90% in Group B and 66.6% in Group F (P = 0.028), while the overall success rate of intubation was 96.6% in Group B and 89.9% in Group F (P = 0.3). The OSP in Group B was 33.7 ± 1.8 and 22.7 ± 1.5 cm H2O in Group F (P = 0.001). Complications such as sore throat and blood stain were reduced with BlockBuster® LMA.Conclusion:BlockBuster® LMA provides higher first pass success rate of blind tracheal intubation with less complications like sore throat and blood staining.

Pre-hospital i-gel blind intubation for trauma: a simulation study.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of i-gel blind intubation (IGI) as a rescue device for definitive airway management in ground intubation for pre-hospital trauma patients.MethodsA prospective randomized crossover study was conducted with 18 paramedics to examine intubation performance of two blind intubation techniques through a supraglottic airway devices (IGI and laryngeal mask airway Fastrach), compared with use of a Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL). Each intubation was conducted at two levels of patient positions (ground- and stretcher-level). Primary outcomes were the intubation time and the success rate for intubation.ResultsThe intubation time (sec) of each intubation technique was not significantly different between the two positions. In both patient positions, the intubation time of IGI was shortest among the three intubation techniques (17.9±5.2 at the ground-level and 16.9±3.8 at the stretcher-level). In the analysis of cumulative success rate and intubation time, IGI was the fastest to reach 100% success among the three intubation techniques regardless of patient position (all P<0.017). The success of intubation was only affected by the intubation technique, and IGI achieved more success than MCL (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 11.6; P=0.03).ConclusionThe patient position did not affect intubation performance. Additionally, the intubation time with blind intubation through supraglottic airway devices, especially with IGI, was significantly shorter than that with MCL.

Comparison of the Supraglottic Airway Devices Classic, Fastrach and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy, Safety and Complications.

This prospective randomised study was designed to compare the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Classic, LMA Fastrach and LMA Supreme regarding ease of insertion and insertion time as primary outcomes and reposition, success rate of trials, effects on haemodynamic parameters, provision of an adequate and safe airway, amount of leakage and oropharyngeal and systemic complications as secondary outcomes. In this clinical trial, 90 patients aged 18-70 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) group I-II were randomised into three groups as providing airway via LMA Classic, LMA Fastrach or LMA Supreme instead of tracheal intubation. No muscle relaxant was used. The allocated LMA was inserted by the same anaesthetist; bispectral index (BIS) was between 40% and 60%. There was no statistical difference among the groups regarding the ease of insertion and insertion time as primary outcomes; the incidence of repositioning during placement was significantly higher in the LMA Classic group than that in other groups (p<0.05) and the rates of bloodstain on the device as well as oropharyngeal mucosal oedema were higher in the LMA Fastrach group than those in other groups (p<0.05) as secondary outcomes. We suggest that LMA Classic, LMA Supreme and LMA Fastrach had similar effectiveness regarding efficiency and airway safety. However, LMA Supreme seems to be more advantageous as it is more appropriate for fewer oropharyngeal complications and there was no repositioning.

Supraglottic Airways: The History and Current State of Prehospital Airway Adjuncts

This review discusses the history, developments, benefits, and complications of supraglottic devices in prehospital care for adults and pediatrics. Evidence supporting their use as well as current controversies and developments in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and rapid sequence airway management is discussed. Devices reviewed include the Laryngeal Mask Airway, Esophageal Tracheal Combitube, Laryngeal Tube, I-Gel, Air-Q, Laryngeal Mask Airway Fastrach, and the Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT).

Endotracheal intubation using a fiberoptic bronchoscope and laryngeal mask airway in ICU

Endotracheal intubation using a fiberoptic bronchoscope and laryngeal mask airway in ICU

The usefulness of the laryngeal mask airway Fastrach for laryngeal surgery

Suspension laryngoscopy under general anaesthesia with a tracheal tube has been widely used for laryngeal microsurgery, but it has some limitations such as intense cardiovascular stimulation during anaesthesia of short duration, occasionally a poor surgical field, and the possibility of a mass being hampered by the tracheal tube. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Fastrach and fibreoptic bronchoscope with a conventional suspension laryngoscope in laryngeal microsurgery. Forty patients scheduled for laryngeal microsurgery were enrolled in this prospective randomized study consecutively. After general anaesthesia was induced, laryngeal microsurgery was performed with a fibreoptic bronchoscope through the LMA Fastrach or conventional suspension laryngoscope. The best view of the surgical field, evaluated by percentage of glottic opening score, was obtained by the up-down manipulations of the LMA Fastrach or repositioning the suspension laryngoscope. Blood pressure and heart rate changes at the baseline, preinsertion, and postinsertion were recorded. Percentage of glottic opening score of the LMA Fastrach group was 100 and that of the suspension laryngoscope group was 80 (P < 0.05). The LMA Fastrach insertion was performed without remarkable systolic or diastolic blood pressure or heart rate changes, but systolic, diastolic blood pressure or heart rate were increased after intubation in the suspension laryngoscope group. The LMA Fastrach during fibreoptic bronchoscope-guided laryngeal surgery provided a good surgical field and haemodynamic stability without additional risk compared with the conventional suspension laryngoscope.

Prospective Clinical and Fiberoptic Evaluation of the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway ™

In March 2007, a new disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) became available. The LMA Supreme (The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, St. Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands) aims to combine the LMA Fastrach feature of easy insertion with the gastric access and high oropharyngeal leak pressures of the LMA ProSeal. The authors performed an evaluative study with the LMA Supreme, size 4, on 100 women to measure the ease of insertion, determinate the laryngeal fit by fiberoptic classification, evaluate the oropharyngeal leak pressure, and report adverse events. Insertion of the LMA Supreme was possible in 94 patients (94%) during the first attempt, and in 5 patients (5%) during the second attempt. In one small patient, the LMA Supreme could not be inserted because of limited pharyngeal space. This patient was excluded from further analysis. Insertion of a gastric tube was possible in all patients at the first attempt. The median time for LMA Supreme insertion was 10.0 s (+/-4.7 s; range, 8-30 s). Laryngeal fit, evaluated by fiberscopic view, was rated as optimal in all patients, both immediately after insertion of the LMA Supreme and at the end of surgery. After equalization to room pressure, the mean cuff volume needed to achieve 60 cm H2O cuff pressure was 18.4 ml (+/-3.8 ml; range, 8-31 ml). The mean oropharyngeal leak pressure at the level of 60 cm H2O cuff pressure was 28.1 cm H2O (+/-3.8 cm H2O, range, 21-35 cm H2O). Eight patients (8.1%) complained of a mild sore throat. No patient reported dysphagia or dysphonia. Clinical evaluation of the LMA Supreme showed easy insertion, optimal laryngeal fit, and low airway morbidity. Oropharyngeal leak pressure results were comparable to earlier data from the LMA ProSeal.

Gastroesophageal regurgitation during anesthesia and controlled ventilation with six airway devices

Study Objective To investigate the frequency of gastroesophageal regurgitation and respiratory mechanics during positive pressure ventilation using 5 supraglottic devices or an endotracheal tube (ETT). Design Prospective, randomized study. Setting Operating rooms in a university-affiliated hospital. Patients 180 ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18 to 65 years old, who underwent elective orthopedic, minor vascular, peripheral plastic, or urologic surgery during general anesthesia. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated to one of 6 airway device groups (n = 30 each): (1) Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway; (2) Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Classic; (3) LMA Fastrach; (4) LMA ProSeal; (5) laryngeal tube; and (6) ETT (SIMS Portex, Ltd, Hythe, Kent, UK). After insertion of the designated device, the lungs of each nonparalyzed patient were mechanically ventilated. Measurements Hypopharyngeal pH, peak inspiratory pressures, sealing pressures, and lung compliance were measured. Hypopharyngeal pH lower than 4 was considered a regurgitation event. Main Results Regurgitation (episodes of pH <4) occurred in between one and 5 patients of each study group, with no statistical difference. Sealing pressures were similar among all the airway device groups. Conclusions The frequency of gastroesophageal regurgitation in anesthetized, unparalyzed, mechanically ventilated patients was similar in patients whose lungs were ventilated with either the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway, LMA Classic, Fastrach, ProSeal, laryngeal tube, or ETT.

Use of the bispectral index to predict a positive awareness reaction to laryngeal mask airway–Fastrach insertion and intubation

To determine whether the bispectral index (BIS) can be monitored to predict and indicate an awareness reaction to laryngeal mask airway-Fastrach (LMA-Fastrach) insertion and intubation at BIS values between 40 and 60. Fifty-one American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) class I or II status patients aged over 20 years were included in this study. Midazolam 0.1 mg/kg was given for pre-medication, 30 min before induction. For induction, a 0.1-microg/kg bolus injection of remifentanil was followed by infusion, and propofol was administered until the eyelash reflex disappeared; the infusion rate was adjusted to maintain BIS values between 40 and 60. Loss of the eyelash reflex, loss of response to verbal commands, yawning and total propofol consumption were recorded. Patients were tested for awareness twice at 1-min intervals using the isolated forearm technique. The test was considered to be positive if the patient squeezed a hand when asked; after muscle relaxation, the patient was intubated and the test was repeated. In the recovery room and ward, patients were asked whether they could recall this event. Seven patients tested positive: two following LMA-Fastrach insertion and the remaining five following intubation. None of the patients had recall. Awareness during anaesthesia may occur at BIS levels that indicate adequate anaesthesia, but this is not associated with recall of the events later.

Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician

We tested the feasibility of using the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach (ILMA) as a ventilatory device and for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician. After completion of a training programme, a single experienced emergency physician used the technique for all patients requiring out-of-hospital tracheal intubation over a 10-month period. If access to the head and neck was limited, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was inserted from below and to the side, otherwise it was inserted from above the head. Data about the time for the ambulance to reach the patient, whether or not access to the head and neck was limited, whether or not circulation was successfully restored, and the insertion and intubation success rates were noted. The mean (range) time for the ambulance to reach the patient was 12 (10-20) min. Access to the head and neck was limited in 8/37 (22%). Circulation was successfully restored in 10/37 (27%). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was successfully inserted at the first attempt in 35/37 (95%) and at the second attempt in 2/37 (5%). The tracheal tube was successfully inserted in 25/37 (67.5%) at the first attempt, 7/37 (19%) at the second attempt and 5/37 (13.5%) at the third attempt. There were no overall failures for intubating laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation. There were no differences in success rate between positions. Oesophageal intubation was detected and corrected in 2/37 (5%). The intubating laryngeal mask airway has a high success rate as a ventilatory device and as a flexible lightwand-guided airway intubator during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a well-trained emergency physician. This technique may be particularly useful when there is limited access to the head and neck.

Eleventh International Symposium on Anesthesia and Intensive Care.

Eleventh International Symposium on Anesthesia and Intensive Care.