Larger Setup Errors Research Articles

Comparison of setup accuracy of optical surface image versus orthogonal x-ray images for VMAT of the left breast using deep-inspiration breath-hold.

To compare the setup accuracy of optical surface image (OSI) versus orthogonal x-ray images (2DkV) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as ground truth for radiotherapy of left breast cancer in deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). Ten left breast DIBH patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were studied retrospectively. OSI, 2DkV, and CBCT were acquired weekly at treatment setup. OSI, 2DkV, and CBCT were registered to planning CT or planning DRR based on a breast surface region of interest (ROI), bony anatomy (chestwall and sternum), and both bony anatomy and breast surface, respectively. These registrations provided couch shifts for each imaging system. The setup errors, or the difference in couch shifts between OSI and CBCT were compared to those between 2DkV and CBCT. A second OSI was acquired during last beam delivery to evaluate intrafraction motion. The median absolute setup errors were (0.21, 0.27, 0.23cm, 0.6°, 1.3°, 1.0°) for OSI, and (0.26, 0.24, 0.18cm, 0.9°, 1.0°, 0.6°) for 2DkV in vertical, longitudinal and lateral translations, and in rotation, roll and pitch, respectively. None of the setup errors was significantly different between OSI and 2DkV. For both systems, the systematic and random setup errors were ≤0.6cm and ≤1.5° in all directions. Nevertheless, larger setup errors were observed in some sessions in both systems. There was no correlation between OSI and CBCT whereas there was modest correlation between 2DkV and CBCT. The intrafraction motion in DIBH detected by OSI was small with median absolute translations <0.2cm, and rotations ≤0.4°. Though OSI showed comparable and small setup errors as 2DkV, it showed no correlation with CBCT. We concluded that to achieve accurate setup for both bony anatomy and breast surface, daily 2DkV can't be omitted following OSI for left breast patients treated with DIBH VMAT.

Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

ABSTRACTThe purpose of the study was to quantify local setup errors and evaluate the planning target volume (PTV) margins for sub-regions in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The local setup errors of 20 patients undergoing CBCT-guided PMRT were analysed retrospectively. Image registration between CBCT and planning CT was performed using four sub-regions of interest (ROIs): the supraclavicular area (SROI), ipsilateral chest wall region (CROI), ipsilateral chest wall plus supraclavicular region (SROI + CROI) and vertebral region (TROI). Bland–Altman analysis, correlation, local setup errors and PTV margins among these ROIs were evaluated. There was no significant consistency or correlation for registration results between the TROI and the CROI or SROI regions on any translational axis. When using the SROI + CROI as the ROI, the systematic error (Σ) and random error (σ) of the local setup errors for the CROI region were 1.81, 1.19 and 1.76 mm and 1.84, 2.64 and 3.00 mm along the medial–lateral (ML), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The PTV margins for the CROI region were 5.80, 4.82 and 6.50 mm. The Σ and σ of the local setup errors for the SROI region were 1.29, 1.15 and 0.77 mm and 1.96, 2.65 and 2.2 mm, respectively, and the PTV margins were 4.59, 4.73 and 3.47 mm. Large setup errors and local setup errors occur in PMRT. The vertebral body should not be a position surrogate for the supraclavicular region or chest wall. To compensate for the local setup errors, different PTV margins are required, even with CBCT guidance.

Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation

Objective:To compare differences in setup error assessment and correction between planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography images for external beam partial breast irradiation during free breathing.Methods:Nineteen patients who received external beam partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery were recruited. Interfraction setup error was acquired using planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography. After online setup correction, the residual error was calculated, and the setup error was compared. The residual error and setup margin were quantified for planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography images.Results:The largest setup error was observed in the anteroposterior direction for both cone beam computed tomography and planar kilovolt imaging (−1.45 mm, 1.74 mm). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup error (systematic error [Σ]) was less than the planar kilovolt images based on Σ in the anteroposterior direction (–1.2 mm vs 2.00 mm; P = .005), and no significant differences were observed for random error (σ) in 3 dimensions (P = .948, .376, .314). After online setup correction, cone beam computed tomography significantly reduced the residual setup error compared with planar kilovolt images in the anteroposterior direction (Σ: −0.20 mm vs 0.50 mm, P = .008; σ: 0.45 mm vs 1.34 mm, P = .002). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup margin was smaller than the planar kilovolt image-based setup margin in the anteroposterior direction (−1.39 mm vs 5.57 mm, P = .003; 0.00 mm vs 3.20 mm, P = .003).Conclusions:Discrepancy between the setup errors observed with planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography was obvious in the anteroposterior direction. Compared to cone beam computed tomography, the elapsed treatment time was smaller when the initial alignment used kilovolt planar imaging. Whether using planar kilovolt or cone beam computed tomography, residual errors can be reduced to 1.5 mm for external beam partial breast irradiation procedures.

Cone beam CT-based set-up strategies with and without rotational correction for stereotactic body radiation therapy in the liver

Background: Accurate patient positioning is crucial in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) due to a high dose regimen. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is often used for patient positioning based on radio-opaque markers. We compared six CBCT-based set-up strategies with or without rotational correction.Material and methods: Twenty-nine patients with three implanted markers received 3-6 fraction liver SBRT. The markers were delineated on the mid-ventilation phase of a 4D-planning-CT. One pretreatment CBCT was acquired per fraction. Set-up strategy 1 used only translational correction based on manual marker match between the CBCT and planning CT. Set-up strategy 2 used automatic 6 degrees-of-freedom registration of the vertebrae closest to the target. The 3D marker trajectories were also extracted from the projections and the mean position of each marker was calculated and used for set-up strategies 3–6. Translational correction only was used for strategy 3. Translational and rotational corrections were used for strategies 4–6 with the rotation being either vertebrae based (strategy 4), or marker based and constrained to ±3° (strategy 5) or unconstrained (strategy 6). The resulting set-up error was calculated as the 3D root-mean-square set-up error of the three markers. The set-up error of the spinal cord was calculated for all strategies.Results: The bony anatomy set-up (2) had the largest set-up error (5.8 mm). The marker-based set-up with unconstrained rotations (6) had the smallest set-up error (0.8 mm) but the largest spinal cord set-up error (12.1 mm). The marker-based set-up with translational correction only (3) or with bony anatomy rotational correction (4) had equivalent set-up error (1.3 mm) but rotational correction reduced the spinal cord set-up error from 4.1 mm to 3.5 mm.Conclusions: Marker-based set-up was substantially better than bony-anatomy set-up. Rotational correction may improve the set-up, but further investigations are required to determine the optimal correction strategy.

Virtual bolus for total body irradiation treated with helical tomotherapy.

Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for total body irradiation (TBI) is practiced in several centers using the TomoTherapy System. In this context the planning target volume (PTV) is the entire body including the skin. A safety margin in the air surrounding the body should be added to take into account setup errors. But using inverse planning, over‐fluence peak could be generated in the skin region to insure dose homogeneity. This work proposes to study the performance of the use of a virtual bolus (VB). A VB is a material placed on the skin surface during planning, but absent for the real treatment. The optimal VB that compensates large setup errors without introducing a high‐dose increase or hot spots for small setup errors was determined. For two cylindrical phantoms, 20 VBs with different densities, thicknesses or designs were tested. Dose coverage of the PTV (V95%) in the presence of simulated setup errors was computed to assess the VB performance. A measure of the dose increase in the phantom center due to the absence of the VB during treatment was also achieved. Finally, the fluence peak at the phantom edge was measured in complete buildup conditions using a large phantom and a detector matrix. Using these VBs, simulated setup errors were compensated to a minimum value of 2.6 and 2.1 cm for small and large phantom, respectively (and only 1.2 and 1.7 cm with no VB). An optimal double‐layer VB was found with a density of 0.4 kg.m−3 and a total thickness of 8 mm; an inner layer of 5 mm was declared as the target for the treatment planning system and an additional layer of 3 mm was added to avoid the over‐fluence peak. Using this VB, setup errors were compensated up to 2.9 cm. The dose increase was measured to be only +1.5% at the phantom center and over‐fluence peak was strongly decreased.PACS numbers: 87.53 Bn, 87.55 D‐, 87.55 de, 87.55 dk

Measurement of mean cardiac dose for various breast irradiation techniques and corresponding risk of major cardiovascular event.

After breast conserving surgery, early stage breast cancer patients are currently treated with a wide range of radiation techniques including whole breast irradiation (WBI), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, or 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). This study compares the mean heart’s doses for a left breast irradiated with different breast techniques. An anthropomorphic Rando phantom was modified with gelatin-based breast of different sizes and tumors located medially or laterally. The breasts were treated with WBI, 3D-CRT, or HDR APBI. The heart’s mean doses were measured with Gafchromic films and controlled with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters. Following the model reported by Darby (1), major cardiac were estimated assuming a linear risk increase with the mean dose to the heart of 7.4% per gray. WBI lead to the highest mean heart dose (2.99 Gy) compared to 3D-CRT APBI (0.51 Gy), multicatheter (1.58 Gy), and balloon HDR (2.17 Gy) for a medially located tumor. This translated into long-term coronary event increases of 22, 3.8, 11.7, and 16% respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed that the tumor location had almost no effect on the mean heart dose for 3D-CRT APBI and a minimal impact for HDR APBI. In case of WBI large breast size and set-up errors lead to sharp increases of the mean heart dose. Its value reached 10.79 Gy for women with large breast and a set-up error of 1.5 cm. Such a high value could increase the risk of having long-term coronary events by 80%. Comparison among different irradiation techniques demonstrates that 3D-CRT APBI appears to be the safest one with less probability of having cardiovascular events in the future. A sensitivity analysis showed that WBI is the most challenging technique for patients with large breasts or when significant set-up errors are anticipated. In those cases, additional heart shielding techniques are required.

A comparison of two systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

BackgroundReproducibility of different immobilization systems, which may affect set-up errors, remains uncertain. Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins and thus may result in undesirable treatment outcomes. This study compared the reproducibility of patient positioning with Hipfix system and whole body alpha cradle with respect to localized prostate cancer and investigated the existing CTV-PTV margins in the clinical oncology departments of two hospitals.MethodsForty sets of data of patients with localized T1-T3 prostate cancer were randomly selected from two regional hospitals, with 20 patients immobilized by a whole-body alpha cradle system and 20 by a thermoplastic Hipfix system. Seven sets of the anterior-posterior (AP), cranial-caudal (CC) and medial-lateral (ML) deviations were collected from each patient. The reproducibility of patient positioning within the two hospitals was compared using a total vector error (TVE) parameter. In addition, CTV-PTV margins were computed using van Herk’s formula. The resulting values were compared to the current CTV-PTV margins in both hospitals.ResultsThe TVE values were 5.1 and 2.8 mm for the Hipfix and the whole-body alpha cradle systems respectively. TVE associated with the whole-body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly less than the Hipfix system (p < 0.05). The CC axis in the Hipfix system attained the highest frequency of large (23.6%) and serious (7.9%) set-up errors. The calculated CTV to PTV margin was 8.3, 1.9 and 2.3 mm for the Hipfix system, and 2.1, 3.4 and 1.8 mm for the whole body alpha cradle in CC, ML and AP axes respectively. All but one (CC axis using Hipfix) margin calculated did not exceed the corresponding hospital protocol. The whole body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly better than the Hipfix system in terms of reproducibility (p < 0.05), especially in the CC axis.ConclusionsThe whole body alpha cradle system was more reproducible than the Hipfix system. In particular, the difference in CC axis contributed most to the results and the current CC margin for the Hipfix system might be considered as inadequate.

EP-1671: Effect of large set-up errors on conventional and IMRT craniospinal irradiation

EP-1671: Effect of large set-up errors on conventional and IMRT craniospinal irradiation

TU-E-BRB-10: Dosimetric Consequences of Setup Errors Using CBCT for SBRT Localization.

Steep dose gradients and high dose per fraction in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR or SBRT) necessitate highly accurate tumor localization. This study evaluates inter-fraction shifts, as defined by couch correction analysis, and investigates the effect of tumor location and internal target volume (ITV) on these shifts. In addition, residual errors associated with post-CBCT correction and their dosimetric consequences were quantified. Daily free-breathing (FB) CBCT images used for daily localization of 78 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Among the population, 39 patients also received pre-treatment kV images after CBCT alignment. ITV inter-fraction displacement was evaluated by matching the CBCT and the FB helical CT images, and setup errors were quantified using orthogonal kV images. Associations between ITV location and inter-fraction motion were studied by categorizing tumors into the following locations: chest-wall seated (CWS) and island, peripheral, central, or upper, middle and lower. Dosimetric consequences for the patient with the largest setup error were explored. ITV inter-fraction motion included the mean of the systematic error, ?inter=(-1.4, 2.0, 1.6) mm, standard deviation (SD) of the systematic error, Σinter=(2.1, 4.2, 2.9) mm, and SD of random errors, sinter=(2.2, 3.2, 3.6) mm. No significant associations were observed between inter-fraction shifts and tumor location or volume. Using CBCT for image guidance reduced the observed errors to μsetup=(-0.3, 0.1, 0.0) mm, Σsetup=(0.6, 0.6, 0.4) mm and ssetup=(1.2, 0.7, 0.7) mm. Dosimetric consequences for the patient with the largest setup error were explored. It was shown that a 3.0 mm setup margin was sufficient to provide greater than 95% dose coverage to the ITV. CBCT image guidance reduced setup errors significantly such that 2-3 mm, population-based, setup margins provided proper dose coverage to the ITV. Further investigation of inter-and intrafraction error classification by tumor location is warranted.

The impact of microscopic disease on the tumor control probability in non-small-cell lung cancer

PurposeTo indicate which clinical target volume (CTV) margin (if any) is needed for an adequate treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using either 3D conformal or stereotactic radiotherapy, taking the distribution of the microscopic disease extension (MDE) into account. Methods and materialsOn the basis of the linear-quadratic biological model, a Monte-Carlo simulation was used to study the impact of MDE and setup deviations on the tumor control probability (TCP) after typical 3D conformal and stereotactic irradiation techniques. Setup deviations were properly accounted for in the planning target volume (PTV) margin. Previously measured distributions of MDE outside the macroscopic tumor in NSCLC patients were used. The dependence of the TCP on the CTV margins was quantified. ResultsThe presence of MDE had a demonstratable influence on the TCP in both the 3D conformal and the stereotactic technique when no CTV margins were employed. The impact of MDE on the TCP values was greater in the 3D conformal scenario (67% TCP with MDE; 84% TCP without MDE) than for stereotactic radiotherapy (91% TCP with MDE; 100% TCP without MDE). Accordingly, an increase of the CTV margin had the greatest impact for the 3D conformal technique. Larger setup errors, with appropriate PTV margins, lead to an increase in TCP for both techniques, showing the interdependence of CTV and PTV margins. ConclusionsMDE may not always be eradicated by the beam penumbra or existing PTV margins using either 3D conformal or stereotactic radiotherapy. Nonetheless, TCP modeling indicates an overall local control rate above 90% for the stereotactic technique, while a non-zero CTV margin is recommended for better local control of MDE when using the 3D conformal technique.

SU‐E‐T‐416: Geometric and Dosimetric Effects of Residual Setup Error on the Cord and Larynx in Split‐Field Head and Neck Radiation Therapy

Purpose: In split‐field head and neck radiation therapy, image guided alignment of the superior IMRT field may result in large setup errors in the supraclavicular field. The goal of this study was to quantify geometric and dosimetric effects of residual setup error on the cord and larynx using the split‐field technique. Methods: Cord and larynx contours of 27 patients were propagated from a planning CT onto daily in‐room CTs using deformable registration. Cord contours were divided into superior and inferior structures at the match plane. Interfractional variations in the position of the larynx, superior cord, and inferior cord centroids were measured. Deformable registration allowed the calculation of cumulative dose delivered for each patient. The discrepancy between planned and delivered doses was compared for the maximum dose to the superior and inferior cord, mean dose to the larynx, larynx V50 and D60. Results: The group mean error, systematic error, and random error of the larynx centroid positions were 0.12cm, 0.06cm, and 0.08cm, laterally, and 0.15cm, 0.06cm, and 0.08cm in the anterior‐posterior direction. The lateral values for the superior cord were 0.04cm, 0.01cm, and 0.03cm, and for the inferior cord were 0.17cm, 0.06cm, and 0.12cm. Lateral and anterior‐posterior margins were 0.22cm and 0.20cm (larynx), 0.05cm and 0.08cm (superior cord), and 0.22cm and 0.35cm (inferior cord). Maximum cord dose was 43.8Gy. The average change in maximum dose was 0.3Gy (max=1.8Gy) for the superior cord, and −0.6Gy (max=1.2Gy) for the inferior cord. The increases in larynx mean dose, V50, and D60 averaged 1.6Gy (SD=2.5Gy), 3.24% (SD=3.52%), and 4.7Gy (SD=6.1Gy). Conclusions: While the inferior cord demonstrated the largest motion, it remained within the cord block. The increase in maximum cord dose and mean larynx dose were no more than 1.8Gy and 5.1Gy, respectively. The split‐field technique remains clinically viable.Funding provided by the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston.

Increasing treatment accuracy for cervical cancer patients using correlations between bladder-filling change and cervix–uterus displacements: Proof of principle

PurposeTo investigate application of pre-treatment established correlations between bladder-filling changes and cervix–uterus displacements in adaptive therapy. Materials and methodsThirteen cervical cancer patients participated in this prospective study. Pre-treatment, and after delivery of 40Gy, a full bladder CT-scan was acquired, followed by voiding the bladder and acquisition of 4 other 3D scans in a 1h period with a naturally filling bladder (variable bladder filling CT-scans, VBF-scans). For the pre-treatment VBF-scans, linear correlations between bladder volume change and displacements of the tip of the uterus (ToU) and the center of mass (CoM) of markers implanted in the fornices of the vagina relative to the full bladder planning scan were established. Prediction accuracy of these correlation models was assessed by comparison with actual displacements in CT-scans, both pre-treatment and after 40Gy. Inter-fraction ToU and marker-CoM displacements were derived from the established correlations and twice-weekly performed in-room bladder volume measurements, using a 3D ultrasound scanner. ResultsTarget displacement in VBF-scans ranged from up to 65mm in a single direction to almost 0mm, depending on the patient. For pre-treatment VBF-scans, the linear correlation models predicted the mean 3D position change for the ToU of 26.1mm±10.8 with a residual of only 2.2mm±1.7. For the marker-CoM, the 8.4mm±5.3 mean positioning error was predicted with a residual of 0.9mm±0.7. After 40Gy, the mean ToU displacement was 26.8mm±15.8, while prediction based on the pre-treatment correlation models yielded a mean residual error of 9.0mm±3.7. Target positioning errors in the fractioned treatments were very large, especially for the ToU (−18.5mm±11.2 for systematic errors in SI-direction). ConclusionsPre-treatment acquired VBF-scans may be used to substantially enhance treatment precision of cervical cancer patients. Application in adaptive therapy is promising and warrants further investigation. For highly conformal (IMRT) treatments, the use of a full bladder drinking protocol results in unacceptably large systematic set-up errors.

SU‐FF‐J‐61: Evaluation of the Need for Simultaneous Orthogonal Gated Setup Imaging

Purpose: As many clinics would prefer to use a pair of kV radiographs for gated patient setup, it is important to quantify the possible errors that could occur due to the non‐simultaneity of the acquisitions. Method and Materials: The data set from 11 patients includes internal and external coordinates acquired at 30Hz during multi‐fraction SBRT treatments. We simulated a gated setup procedure which included an AP radiograph, followed by a lateral radiograph. The time interval between the two radiographic acquisitions was set to a minimum of 30 seconds based on our clinical experience. The setup position is derived from a combination of both the initial (AP) and the second (LAT) image in the following way: . The 3D error is then the magnitude of the vector from the initial position to the setup position. The calculation was done for every exhale phase in the data for which there was another one at least 30 seconds later at an amplitude within 2 mm from the first. In all, 1908 data points were analyzed. Results: The 3D error is found to be less than 2 mm for 91% of the data points and less than 3 mm for 97% of the data. The maximum error found was 7.5 mm. 97.5% of the second acquisitions could be completed within 35 seconds of the first. The maximum time interval found was 42 seconds. No correlation was found between the length of the time interval and the 3D error. Conclusion: When acquiring gated radiographs for patient setup, no large setup errors should be expected if those images are not taken simultaneously. Conflict of Interest: This work was sponsored, in part, by a grant from Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

Daily stereotactic ultrasound prostate targeting: inter-user variability.

We analyzed the inter-user variability of patient setup for prostate radiotherapy using a stereotactic ultrasound-targeting device. Setup variations in 20 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. Users were a radiation oncologist, a medical physicist, four radiation technologists (RTT) and a radiologist. The radiation oncologist, radiologist, physicist and two RTTs were experienced users of the system (>18 months of experience); two RTTs were users new to the system. Gold standard for this analysis was a control CT acquired immediately following ultrasound targeting. For inter-user variability assessments, the radiation oncologist provided a set of axial and sagittal freeze-frames (standard freeze-frames) for virtual targeting by all users. Additionally each user acquired individual freeze-frames for target alignments. We analyzed the range of virtual setups in each patient along the principal room axes based on standard and individual freeze-frames. The magnitude of residual setup error and percentage of setup change for each user was assessed by control CT/planning CT comparison with individual virtual shifts. A total of 184 alignments were analyzed. The range of virtual shifts between users was 2.7+/-1.4, 3.6+/-1.1, and 4.4+/-1.4 mm (mean+/-SD) in x, y and z-direction for setups based on standard freeze-frames and 3.9+/-2.6, 6.0+/-4.7, and 5.4+/-2.7 mm for setups based on individual freeze-frames. When only virtual shifts of experienced users were analyzed, the mean ranges were reduced by up to 2.4 mm. Average magnitude of initial setup error before ultrasound targeting was 14.3 mm. Average improvement of prostate setup was 63.1+/-23.4% in experienced and 35.14+/-37.7% in inexperienced users, respectively (p<0.0001). Only 5 of 184 (2.7%) virtual alignments would have introduced new larger setup errors (mean 3.2 mm, range 0.2 to 9.5 mm) than the magnitude of the initial setup error. We conclude that ultrasound guided treatment setup for patients treated for prostate cancer can be performed with high inter-user consistency and does lead to improved treatment setup in more than 97% of attempted setups. Experienced use is correlated with a reduced range of setups between users and higher degree of setup improvement when compared with users new to the system

Procedures for high precision setup verification and correction of lung cancer patients using CT-simulation and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR)

Purpose: In a recent study, large systematic setup errors were detected in patients with lung cancer when a conventional simulation procedure was used to define and mark the treatment isocenter. In the present study, we describe a procedure to omit the session at a conventional simulator to remove simulation errors entirely. Isocenter definition and verification was performed at a computed tomography (CT) simulator, and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were used for setup verification and correction at the treatment unit. Methods and Materials: A CT simulation protocol was developed, in which radiopaque markers were used to verify the coincidence of the isocenter marked on the patients’ skin with the isocenter defined in the planning CT scan. This protocol was evaluated for 20 patients. Subsequently, electronic portal images were acquired at the treatment unit. The three-dimensional setup error was established from a template match of the appropriate anatomy visible in two orthogonal beams with the corresponding anatomy in DRRs. An offline setup correction protocol was applied to reduce systematic setup errors. Results: For all patients, the skin marks defined the planning CT scan isocenter to within ± 1.5 mm in each of the three main directions. Random setup errors at the treatment unit were 1.8, 2.0, and 1.9 mm (1 SD) for the lateral ( x), the superior-inferior ( y), and the anterior-posterior (z) directions, respectively. With the use of the correction protocol, the systematic errors for x, y, and z were 1.5, 1.5, and 1.3 mm (1 SD). Conclusions: Because the distributions of treatment setup errors measured against DRRs obtained in our CT simulation were equal to previously obtained distributions measured against simulator films, conventional simulation can be omitted and DRRs are well-suited for setup verification. By adopting our CT simulation procedure, the large systematic simulation setup errors, which remain hidden if a conventional simulation is performed, can be avoided.

Portal dose images II: Patient dose estimation

Due to the many sources of uncertainties in radiotherapy, conventional treatment planning can only provide a nominal presentation of the dose delivered to the patient. Provided that large setup errors can be detected and corrected, we propose that measured and calculated portal dose images can be used to improve estimation of patient dose. The iterative approach described in this paper requires an accurate method of dose calculations, 3-dimensional CT data that closely represents the patient and the measured portal dose image. From the CT data, a portal dose image is calculated for comparison with the measured one. The differences are then used to modify the original CT data so that a new image can be calculated. The process is repeated until the calculated and measured images agree to satisfaction. At that point, the internal dose is calculated using the modified CT data. If the method is successful, daily portal dose images could be used to cumulatively estimate patient dose throughout the course of treatment. This manuscript describes 60Co simulation results to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach.