Reviewed by: Building Transfer Student Pathways for College and Career Success ed. by Mark Allen Poisel and Sonya Joseph Jessica Hale Building Transfer Student Pathways for College and Career Success Mark Allen Poisel and Sonya Joseph (Editors) Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and the National Institute for the Study of Transfer Experiences, 2018, 153 pages, $30.00 (softcover) Building Transfer Pathways for College and Career Success is the result of a sponsorship collaboration between the National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and the National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students (NISTS). Editors Mark Allen Poisel (Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs and the University of Arkansas at Little Rock) and Sonya Joseph (Assistant Vice President of Student Affairs at Valencia Community College) are experts on student transfer, each with decades of experience cultivating transfer-receptive institutions. Their original exploration of this topic, Transfer Students in Higher Education: Building Foundations for Policies, Programs, and Services That Foster Student Success (Poisel & Joseph, 2011), was published more than seven years ago, and since then the number of transfer students and the complexity of the transfer environment have dramatically increased. This text tracks the progress that has been made to increase transfer student degree attainment and explores what efforts have been made to improve the quality of the transfer experience as well, with a focus on research, policy, and practice. In chapter 1 Douglas T. Shapiro sets out with three goals: elucidate various transfer pathways, use data to characterize the population of transfer students, and share transfer student success outcomes. Data from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center show that the pathways by which students arrive at any institution are much more diverse than the traditional vertical transfer from a 2-year institution to a 4-year institution, and these pathways extend well beyond the traditional 4 years. Perhaps more importantly, the data correlate students’ success in attaining degrees with their patterns of transfer. Shapiro advocates for sharing this information with students to illuminate how transfer choices may impact their overall success. He also advocates for creating policies and services that support transfer students even if that means preparing students for degree attainment at another institution. In chapter 2 Nancy Dietrich, Gloria Gammell, and India Lane, examine a collaboration between the state legislature, the Governor’s office, and the entire higher education community to address Tennessee’s low educational attainment rates by increasing the number of degrees attained through reverse transfer: a process for transfer students who are currently attending a 4-year school to combine 4-year college credits with their community college credits to receive an associate’s degree. Not only does reverse transfer increase the number of degree completers at the community college, but associate’s degree completion correlates with successful completion of a 4-year degree. The authors outline the evolution of this program and its impact on transfer students and provide recommendations for other states contemplating similar programs. Chapter 3 highlights the decade-long partnerships between the Maricopa Community College system and Arizona State University, and between Valencia College and the University of Central Florida. Authors Joyce C. Romano and Maria L. Hesse share that these two vertical transfer partnerships set in large higher education systems have produced increased student achievement at both the community college and university levels. The foundation of these two transfer models is curricular clarity and transfer readiness. The [End Page 635] authors present a six-dimensional model of transfer readiness, highlighting the importance of a student’s personal aspirations, purpose, curricular plan, academic preparation, career preparation, and social preparation along with how these components have been embedded in each of the aforementioned transfer programs. They end the chapter calling upon higher education professionals to begin creating similar, intentional programs and services for this diverse student population. In chapter 4 Stephanie Foote urges readers to consider the complexity of a transfer student’s context, along with factors such as transfer capital and customized delivery formats, when developing a transfer orientation program. Foote encourages the use of student development theories to better understand transfer populations and recommends designing programs accordingly. Foote then highlights a handful of...
Read full abstract