There are still some patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) experienced unsuccessful recanalization after endovascular thrombectomy. The efficacy of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy for such patients is unknown. We performed this study to investigate whether prior intravenous alteplase could affect the outcome of patients with unsuccessful recanalization. This is a post-hoc analysis of the DIRECT-MT trial. Patients with final extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 0-2a were included. Patients with successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) or could not be assessed for mTICI were excluded. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, while secondary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2), recanalization (modified arterial occlusive lesion) rates at 24-72h by CTA, infarction volume on CT, rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aSICH). Among 656 randomized patients, 92 patients with unsuccessful recanalization were included, of which 55 patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy alone (EVT-group) and 37 patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy preceded by intravenous alteplase (combination group). No statistically significant difference in the 90-day mRS score was observed between the two groups (Adjusted cOR=1.65; 95%CI, 0.76 to 3.59). The volume of infarction, the proportion of 90-day functional independence, recanalization rates at 24-72 h, rates of SICH and rates of aSICH were similar in both groups. We found no evidence that prior intravenous alteplase could affect the clinical or imaging outcome in patients with acute anterior circulation LVOS and unsuccessful recanalization after endovascular thrombectomy.
Read full abstract