Large-scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Research Articles

The Effect of Energy Deposition Hemispherical Asymmetry on Characteristics of LSTIDs During 17 March 2015 Geomagnetic Storm

AbstractThis article presents the effect of energy deposition hemispherical asymmetry on characteristics of large scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) such as the amplitude and velocity during the geomagnetic storm of 17–18 March 2015. LSTIDs are quantified using total electron content (TEC) derived from Global Navigation Satellite System observations considering a longitude range of 50° over the America, Europe‐Africa, and Asia‐Australia sectors at geomagnetic Conjugate Regions (CR). We applied the cross‐correlation method between time series of change in TEC (ΔTEC) to estimate meridional velocities of LSTIDs in all sectors of both hemispheres. Our results revealed that amplitude of LSTIDs are larger most of the time in the northern hemisphere than the geomagnetic CR in the southern hemisphere which may partly be accounted for by hemispherical energy imbalance during storm time. In addition, on average higher meridional LSTIDs velocities are observed in northern hemisphere in all sectors during 17 March 2015 geomagnetic storm.

Ionospheric behaviors and characteristics in Asian sector during the April 2023 geomagnetic storm with multi-instruments observations

Geomagnetic storms frequently affect satellite navigation, communication and satellite orbits. Monitoring and understanding the ionospheric disturbances and responses to geomagnetic storms are crucial. The detailed ionospheric responses and physical mechanisms to various geomagnetic storms, however, have not yet been extensively studied. In this paper, the ionospheric variation behaviors and features following the April 2023 magnetic storm along the Asian sector are thoroughly studied using multi-instrument observation data, including the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), ionosonde, and other satellites. Large-scale Traveling Ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) are observed from BeiDou Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, GPS and GLONASS. LSTIDs traveled with a speed of 760–1300 m/s from high latitude region to low latitude region with a period of about 40 min. The equatorial propagating LSTIDs were generated by coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which occurred in April 2023 with periodic energy input from the auroral area. The poleward LSTIDs are also observed with a velocity of approximately 600–750 m/s and the period is similar. Neutral wind also influenced the characteristics of the ionospheric response. The [O]/[N2] ratio declined during the storm, which led to the formation of the negative storm phases. The largest vertical total electron content (VTEC) is found, and the strengthened region of TEC is mainly centered between ± 20° within geographical latitude. Equatorial Ionospheric Anomaly (EIA) is also observed, which is probably influenced by the electric field. As the time goes on, the peak on the south side of the EIA is disappearing. Meanwhile, the height of the ionospheric maximum electron density rises, and the electron density falls.

Large‐Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Over the European Sector During the Geomagnetic Storm on March 23–24, 2023: Energy Deposition in the Source Regions and the Propagation Characteristics

AbstractMultiple Large‐Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances (LSTIDs) are observed in the European sector in both day‐time and night‐time during the magnetic storm on March 23–24, 2023. The Total Electron Content (TEC) observation from a network of GNSS receivers shows the propagation of LSTIDs with amplitudes between around 0.5 and 1 TECU originating from auroral and polar cusp regions down to southern Europe (35°N) with velocities between around 500 and 1,600 [m/s]. We study the energy deposition to the LSTIDs in the source regions and the resulting horizontal propagation over storm‐time background density by using continuous measurements of EISCAT incoherent scatter radars in northern Norway and Svalbard that allow for estimating the source energy to the thermosphere‐ionosphere system via Joule heating and particle precipitation. Both EISCAT and GNSS TEC data show that the electron density decreased to 50% in the auroral zone after the storm onset. The ionospheric heating caused a nearly 250% increase in the electron temperature above 200 km altitude and the ion temperature above 100 km altitude. We find that Joule Heating acts as a primary energy source for the night‐time LSTIDs triggered in the auroral region, while the day‐time LSTIDs can be also driven by precipitating particles in the polar cusp. We also find that a significant background density decrease over the whole European sector is caused by this storm for the following day, during which almost no clear LSTIDs are observed.

Investigation of Large Scale Traveling Atmospheric/Ionospheric Disturbances Using the Coupled SAMI3 and GITM Models

AbstractWe present simulation results of the vertical structure of Large Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances (LSTIDs) during synthetic geomagnetic storms. These data are produced using a one‐way coupled SAMI3/Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM) model, where GITM provides thermospheric information to SAMI3 (SAMI3 is Another Model of the Ionosphere), producing LSTIDs. We show simulation results which demonstrate that the traveling atmospheric disturbances (TADs) generated in GITM extend to the topside ionosphere in SAMI3 as LSTIDs. The speed and wavelength (600–700 m/s and 10º–20° latitude) are consistent with LSTID observations in storms of similar magnitudes. We demonstrate the LSTIDs reach altitudes beyond the topside ionosphere with amplitudes of <5% over background which will facilitate the use of plasma measurements from the topside ionosphere to supplement measurements from Global Navigation Satellite System in the study of Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances (TIDs). Additionally, we demonstrate the dependence of the characteristics of these TADs and TIDs on longitude.

Observations and simulations of large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the January 14-15, 2022 geomagnetic storm

Using the total electron content (TEC) observations from GPS, and simulations from the Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamic General Circulation Model (TIEGCM), this work investigates the large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) and the possible involved drivers during the geomagnetic storm on January 14-15, 2022. Based on the term analysis of O+ continuity equation in TIEGCM, it is found that the traveling atmospheric disturbances in equatorward winds are responsible for the LSTIDs, with minor contributions from plasma drifts owing to the prompt penetration electric field. A strong interhemispheric asymmetry of the LSTIDs is observed, which might be attributed to both the equatorward wind disturbances and background plasma. The stronger wind (plasma) disturbances occurs in the winter hemisphere than that in the summer hemisphere. The maximum magnitude of LSTIDs in electron density disturbances occurs at ∼250 and ∼270 km in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively, owing to both the thermospheric equatorward winds and background plasma. An interesting phenomenon that tail-like LSTIDs occur at the dip equator and low latitudes might be related to the eruption of the Tonga volcano, but it is not well reproduced in TIEGCM that deserves further exploration in a future study.

Large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances over central and eastern Europe during moderate magnetic storm period on 22–24 September 2020

We present the results of ground based remote sensing observations of large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) occurring during the moderate magnetic storm evolution (22–24 September 2020) over central and eastern Europe. Three ionosondes located in Juliusruh, Pru˚honice and near Kharkiv, and the Kharkiv incoherent scatter radar were employed to study temporal and spatial LSTID signatures in ionospheric F2 peak density and height and electron density variations at the heights of 100–300 km. Two types of LSTIDs are detected, which are originated during enhancement in auroral activity (2 events) and local sunrise terminator passage (3 events) from the ionosonde data. The magnetic storm-related LSTIDs exhibit equatorward propagation with the horizontal phase velocities of 546 m/s and 576 m/s, similar dominant periods of 135–150 min and 165–180 min over all three sites and a longitudinal dependence in fractional (relative) amplitudes of electron density perturbation. The solar terminator induced LSTIDs demonstrate the variety in both relative amplitudes and dominant periods over different locations. They have a westward apparent horizontal phase velocities of 288–345 m/s, which are close to the solar terminator velocity at ionospheric heights. Employment of incoherent scatter data enabled the detection of additional LSTIDs over Ukraine with the periods in a broader range of 41–168 min, an establishment of phase and onset differences for the oscillations in the ionospheric F2 peak electron density and height.

A new index for statistical analyses and prediction of travelling ionospheric disturbances

Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances (TIDs) are signatures of atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) observed in changes in the electron density. The analysis of TIDs is relevant for studying coupling processes in the thermosphere–ionosphere system. A new TID index ATID is introduced, which is based on an easy extension of the commonly used approach for TID detection. This TID activity index, which can be applied for individual Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) stations and also for mapping TID activity, is capable to study both Large Scale TIDs (LSTIDs) and Medium Scale TIDs (MSTIDs).ATID is well applicable for statistical analyses and investigations of the source mechanisms of TIDs. Correlation studies presented here reveal that LSTID magnitudes at mid-latitudes are well correlated with solar wind derived parameters, like the Kan-Lee merging electric field (EKL), the intermediate function (EWAV) and the modified version of the Akasufo ϵ parameter (ϵ3). Thus, the magnitude of the global solar-wind energy input into the Earth’s magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere system is most relevant for the LSTID generation. The correlation with common geomagnetic activity indices shows that also sudden changes in the magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere system are relevant. Good correlation results are limited to mid-latitudes. High-latitude regions are impacted by auroral processes and low-latitude regions by coupling from below and other instabilities.ATID can be used for the modelling and prediction as demonstrated with a prediction model for storm induced LSTIDs, based on solar wind observations only. Very good performance of this LSTIDs prediction model in mid-latitudes has been proven.

Identification of Large-Scale Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances (LSTIDs) Based on Digisonde Observations

In this paper we analyze Digisonde observations obtained in the European region to specify the effects of large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) on the ionospheric characteristics that define the conditions in the bottomside ionosphere. While this type of disturbances affects all frequency ranges in the F region, the most pronounced effect is detected in the foF2 critical frequency, where the density is the highest. During LSTID activity, a significant uplifting of the F2 layer is observed to accompany an oscillation pattern in the foF2. Concurrent variations in the height of the peak electron density hmF2 and the corresponding scale height, Hm are also observed. These findings are used to propose a new methodology for the identification of LSTIDs, comprising a combination of different criteria. The efficiency of the proposed methodology is tested at middle latitudes during geomagnetically quiet and disturbed intervals as well as during time periods of lower atmosphere forcing affecting the ionosphere.

Storm‐Time Observations of Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances and Ionospheric Irregularities in East Africa

AbstractIn this paper equatorward propagating large scale traveling ionospheric disturbance (LSTID) on 17 March 2015 were investigated using the Statistical Angle‐of‐Arrival and Doppler Method for GPS (SADM‐GPS) radio interferometry technique in data‐scarce East Africa. To apply the SADM‐GPS method, 5 GPS arrays each with 3 GPS receivers arranged in a triangular geometry were used. Our results show that during 15:00–18:00 UT on 17 March, TIDs with mean horizontal velocities between 161.9 and 464.4 m/s were observed. Using the wavelet analysis, the periods of TIDs in a range of 51–69 min that qualify to LSTIDs were revealed. The peak‐to‐peak phase shift of detrended total electron content (TEC) over latitudes in this study confirms the equatorward TID propagation, which was obtained by the SADM‐GPS technique. A pair of magnetometers were used to infer E × B drift and an adequate agreement was found with Swarm satellites derived plasma density that enabled us to explain the behaviour of ionospheric irregularity during the main phase of the geomagnetic storm. Moreover, significant TEC enhancement (reaching ∼20%–105%) were captured by GPS arrays during the period of TID propagation. Nevertheless, the rate of change of TEC (ROT) and ROT index (ROTI) show wavy structures that reflect TID effects over ionospheric modulations during the post noon to evening hours of 17 March 2015.

Aspects related to variability of radiative cooling by NO in lower thermosphere, TEC and O/N2 correlation, and diffusion of NO into mesosphere during the Halloween storms

Nitric Oxide is a very important trace species which plays a significant role acting as a natural thermostat in Earth’s thermosphere during strong geomagnetic activity. In this paper, we present various aspects related to the variation in the NO Infrared radiative flux (IRF) exiting the thermosphere by utilizing the TIMED/SABER (Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics/ Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry) observational data during the Halloween storm which occurred in late October 2003. The Halloween storm comprised of three intense-geomagnetic storms. The variability of NO infrared flux during these storm events and its connection to the strength of the geomagnetic storms were found to be different in contrast to similar super storms. The connection between the quantum of energy outflux from the upper atmosphere into space in terms of NO IRF and the duration of storms is established. The NO radiative cooling, and the closely correlated depletion in O/N2 ratio are controlled by the Joule heating intensity (proxied by AE-index). The collisional excitation rate of NO, calculated using the modelled datasets of WACCM-X (Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with thermosphere and ionosphere extension), correlates well with the observed pattern of radiative emission by NO. Observational datasets from TIMED/GUVI (Global Ultra-Violet Imager) and MIT Haystack observatory madrigal GNSS (Global navigation satellite system) total electron content (TEC) database shows that the TEC and O/N2 enhancement in low-mid northern hemispheric latitudes are mainly controlled by the z-component of Interplanetary magnetic field (IMF-Bz). The penetration of eastward electric field during the storm events is found to be responsible for the overall enhancement of TEC. The contribution of enhanced day-side TEC in observed variation of O/N2 ratio by GUVI is also reported. It is also seen that during substorms related events the night-time polar region experiences more cooling due to NO than the daytime polar region. The connections between the mid- and low-latitude enhancement in NO IRF with the propagation of LSTIDs (Large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances) in combination with the O/N2 variability, and the altitudinal variation in NO flux with the progression of the storm is also investigated. This study presents the evidence on the role of diffusion processes in the large scale enhancement of NO in the mesospheric altitudes.

Interaction Between Equatorial to Low‐Latitude Postmidnight F‐Region Irregularities and LSTIDs in China During Geomagnetic Disturbances Based on Ground‐Based Instruments

AbstractIn this paper, the interaction between equatorial to low‐latitude postmidnight ionospheric irregularities and large‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) on 14 December 2015 during strong geomagnetic disturbances in China is studied by using multiple ground‐based observations. Postmidnight irregularities initiated near the magnetic equator and extended northward to higher latitudes (∼28°N) until the local early morning period (∼05 LT), which is unusual in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Multibeam observations by the very high frequency coherent scatter radar at Fuke (19.5°N, 109.1°E; dip latitude 14.4°N), Hainan Island, China, showed that the meter‐scale field‐aligned irregularities were still in the evolutionary phase during the postmidnight period (∼04 LT) instead of the fossil structures that must already be in their decay phase. Meanwhile, the emergence of the postmidnight ionospheric irregularities was accompanied by the passage of LSTIDs, as revealed by total electron content measurements. Southward and northward LSTIDs, with velocities of ∼550–570 m/s and periods of ∼80–100 min, that originated from opposite hemispheres met at ∼27°–28°N, and the LSTIDs might produce localized perturbation during their passage to initiate the instability for the postmidnight irregularity development. The height of the ionospheric F‐layer measured by the collocated Digisonde at Fuke was suggested to be modulated by the overshielding penetration electric field and storm‐related atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs). This interesting case gives insight into the important role of storm‐related AGWs in providing seeding sources for plasma bubble development and reveals unique characteristics of coupling between LSTIDs and plasma bubbles during the postmidnight sector.

Investigation of the negative ionospheric response of the 8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm over the European sector

In this study, we investigate the negative ionospheric response over the European sector during two storms that took place on 8 September 2017, primarily, by exploiting observations over ten European locations. The spatial and temporal variations of TEC, foF2 and hmF2 ionospheric characteristics are examined with the aim to explain the physical mechanisms underlying the strong negative ionospheric response. We detected very sharp electron density (in terms of foF2 and TEC) decrease during the main phases of the two storms and we attributed this phenomenon to the large displacement of the Midlatitude Ionospheric Trough (MIT). Our study also revealed that the two storms show different features caused by different processes. In addition, Large Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances (LSTIDs) were observed during both storms, followed by enhanced Spread F conditions over Digisonde stations. The regional dependence of ionospheric storm effects was demonstrated, as the behavior of ionospheric effects over the northern part of Europe differed from that over the southern part.

Investigation on Horizontal and Vertical Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Propagation in Global‐Scale Using GNSS and Multi‐LEO Satellites

AbstractGlobal Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations from worldwide ground‐based stations have been extensively used in traveling ionospheric disturbance (TID) detections. However, these observations primarily cover land area, thus causing a challenging problem of interpreting the global propagating characteristics of large‐scale TIDs (LSTIDs), especially over the ocean area. Meanwhile, Total Electron Content (TEC) values derived from ground‐based GNSS signals propagating through the whole ionosphere have an integral character, and we were unable to obtain the propagation and dissipation of TIDs in the vertical direction using solely ground‐based GNSS TEC data. In this study, apart from ground‐based GNSS observations, in situ data and GNSS observations from precise orbit determination receivers on board Low‐Earth‐Orbit (LEO) satellites were integrated for the first time for the global large‐scale TID investigation during the St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm. Through experiments, we found that LEO satellite observations effectively compensate for areas where the TIDs cannot be detected by sparse ground‐based GNSS data, particularly over the ocean and polar areas. The space‐borne TEC and in situ data provided the new observational evidences of LSTIDs propagating up to the topside ionosphere during the 17 March 2015 storm, serving as great supplements to ground‐based GNSS data. Combining space‐borne GNSS data with in situ data at various orbit altitudes offers opportunities for theoretical studies of TID propagations at different ionospheric heights and for a better understanding of the complex coupled processes of the TIDs with the geospace environment.

Comparison of Ionospheric Response to Two Types of Electron Concentration Disturbances

Based on the data of vertical sounding of the ionosphere in Almaty in 2000–2008, the paper deals with the response of the F2-layer to the passage of large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) and the formation of the nighttime enhancements in the electron concentration of the F2-layer. For these two types of perturbations, we compared behavior in the time of the following layer parameters: the height of maximum of the layer (hmF), the height of the bottom of the layer (hbotF), the half-thickness of the layer (Δh = hmF − hbotF), the electron concentration at fixed heights and at the maximum of the layer (NmF), the height profiles of the nighttime enhancement peak-to-peak value of the F2-layer (A), and the height hAm corresponding to the maximum enhancement amplitude. The parameters hmF, hbotF and Δh demonstrate similar dependences associated with the temporal expansion and upward rise of the ionospheric layer and its lowering, accompanied by layer compression, giving an NmF peak at the moment of maximum compression. The common features of the profiles of two types of disturbances are found: the height hAm is always below hmF, there is a good correlation between hAm and hmF, and the difference between hAm and hmF increases linearly with hmF.

Global Propagation of Ionospheric Disturbances Associated With the 2022 Tonga Volcanic Eruption

AbstractIn this study, we use measurements from over 4,735 globally distributed Global Navigation Satellite System receivers to track the progression of traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) associated with the 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai submarine volcanic eruption. We identify two distinct Large Scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) and several subsequent Medium Scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (MSTIDs) that propagate radially outward from the eruption site. Within 3,000 km of epicenter, LSTIDs of >1,600 km wavelengths are initially observed propagating at speeds of ∼950 and ∼555 ms−1, before substantial slowing to ∼600 and ∼390 ms−1, respectively. MSTIDs with speeds of 200–400 ms−1 are observed for 6 hrs following eruption, the first of which comprises the dominant global ionospheric response and coincides with the atmospheric surface pressure disturbance associated with the eruption. These are the first results demonstrating the global impact of the Tonga eruption on the ionospheric state.

First Observations of Large Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Using Automated Amateur Radio Receiving Networks

AbstractWe demonstrate a novel method for observing Large Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances (LSTIDs) using high frequency (HF) amateur radio reporting networks, including the Reverse Beacon Network (RBN), Weak Signal Propagation Reporter Network (WSPRNet), and PSKReporter. LSTIDs are quasi‐periodic variations in ionospheric densities with horizontal wavelengths >1,000 km and periods between 30 and 180 min. On Nov 3, 2017, LSTID signatures were observed simultaneously over the continental United States in amateur radio, SuperDARN HF radar, and GNSS Total Electron Content with a period of ∼2.5 hr, propagation azimuth of ∼163°, horizontal wavelength of ∼1680 km, and phase speed of ∼1,200 km hr−1. SuperMAG SME index enhancements and Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar measurements suggest the LSTIDs were driven by auroral electrojet intensifications and Joule heating. This novel measurement technique has applications in future scientific studies and for assessing the impact of LSTIDs on HF communications.

Long-Term Observation of the Quasi-3-Hour Large-Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances by the Oblique-Incidence Ionosonde Network in North China.

The oblique-incidence ionosonde network in North China is a very unique system for regional ionospheric observation. It contains 5 transmitters and 20 receivers, and it has 99 ionospheric observation points between 22.40° N and 33.19° N geomagnetic latitudes. The data of the ionosonde network were used to investigate the statistical characteristics of the quasi-3-h large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs). From September 2009 to August 2011, 157 cases of the quiet-time LSTIDs were recorded; 110 cases traveled southward, 46 cases traveled southwestward and only 1 case traveled southeastward. The LSTIDs mainly appeared between 10:00 and 19:00 LT in the months from September to the following May. We compared the data of the Beijing, Mohe and Yakutsk digisondes and found that the LSTIDs are most likely to come from the northern auroral region. These LSTIDs may be induced by the atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) and presented obvious seasonal and diurnal varying features, indicating that the thermospheric wind field has played an important role.

Direct Connection Between Auroral Oval Streamers/Flow Channels and Equatorward Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances

We use simultaneous auroral imaging, radar flows, and total electron content (TEC) measurements over Alaska to examine whether there is a direct connection of large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) to auroral streamers and associated flow channels having significant ground magnetic decreases. Observations from seven nights with clearly observable flow channels and/or auroral streamers were selected for analysis. Auroral observations allow identification of streamers, and TEC observations detect ionization enhancements associated with streamer electron precipitation. Radar observations allow direct detection of flow channels. The TEC observations show direct connection of streamers to TIDs propagating equatorward from the equatorward boundary of the auroral oval. The TIDs are also distinguished from the streamers to which they connect by their wave-like TEC fluctuations moving more slowly equatorward than the TEC enhancements from streamer electron precipitation. TIDs previously observed propagating equatorward from the auroral oval have been identified as LSTIDs. Thus, the TIDs here are likely LSTIDs, but we lack sufficient TEC coverage necessary to demonstrate that they are indeed large scale. Furthermore, each of our events shows TID’s connection to groups of a few streamers and flow channels over a period in the order of 15 min and a longitude range of ∼15–20°, and not to single streamers. (Groups of streamers are common during substorms. However, it is not currently known if streamers and associated flow channels typically occur in such groups.) We also find evidence that a flow channel must lead to a sufficiently large ionospheric current for it to lead to a detectable LSTID, with a few tens of nT ground magnetic field decreases not being sufficient.

Influence of the ionosphere on the accuracy of the satellite navigation system

The presence of large and small-scale irregularities TID of the ionosphere in the path of radio wave propagation from the navigation satellite to the GPS receiver is the main challenge for the application of ionospheric research to improve positioning accuracy using single-frequency receivers. In this paper, in contrast to the traditional methods of compensating for the error associated with the ionospheric delay (the Klobuchar method and the use of TEC values), we propose the calculation of the ionospheric delay by the ray tracing method in a model that is as close as possible to the real conditions. To achieve this proximity, a model is proposed that includes various types of TID irregularities. The corresponding algorithms are presented and the numerical results are given. It is shown that single large-scale TIDs can lead to errors of 10–30 m, errors due to small-scale TIDs do not exceed 2 m. © 2001 Elsevier Science. All rights reserved.

Ionosonde Observations of Spread F and Spread Es at Low and Middle Latitudes during the Recovery Phase of the 7–9 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm

This study presents observations of nighttime spread F/ionospheric irregularities and spread Es at low and middle latitudes in the South East Asia longitude of China sectors during the recovery phase of the 7–9 September 2017 geomagnetic storm. In this study, multiple observations, including a chain of three ionosondes located about the longitude of 100°E, Swarm satellites, and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) ROTI maps, were used to study the development process and evolution characteristics of the nighttime spread F/ionospheric irregularities at low and middle latitudes. Interestingly, spread F and intense spread Es were simultaneously observed by three ionosondes during the recovery phase. Moreover, associated ionospheric irregularities could be observed by Swarm satellites and ground-based GNSS ionospheric TEC. Nighttime spread F and spread Es at low and middle latitudes might be due to multiple off-vertical reflection echoes from the large-scale tilts in the bottom ionosphere. In addition, we found that the periods of the disturbance ionosphere are ~1 h at ZHY station, ~1.5 h at LSH station and ~1 h at PUR station, respectively. It suggested that the large-scale tilts in the bottom ionosphere might be produced by LSTIDs (Large scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances), which might be induced by the high-latitude energy inputs during the recovery phase of this storm. Furthermore, the associated ionospheric irregularities observed by satellites and ground-based GNSS receivers might be caused by the local electric field induced by LSTIDs.