In view of the current biodiversity crisis and our need to preserve and improve ecosystem functioning, efficient means for characterizing and monitoring biodiversity are required. DNA barcoding, especially when coupled with new sequencing technologies, is a promising method that can, in principle, also be employed by taxonomic lay people. In this study we compare the performance of DNA barcoding by means of a third-generation sequencing technology, nanopore sequencing with classical Sanger sequencing, based on a sample of invertebrates collected from moss pads in a bog in Austria. We find that our nanopore sequencing pipeline generates DNA barcodes that are at least as good as barcodes generated with Sanger sequencing, with the MinION producing better results than the Flongle flowcell. We further find that while many arthropod taxa are well covered in the international reference DNA barcode database BOLD, this clearly is not the case for important taxa like mites and springtails, which hampers large-scale biodiversity assessments. Based on examples from our study we further highlight which factors might be responsible for ambiguous species identification based on BOLD and how this can, at least partly, be solved.
Read full abstract