Large Hospital Research Articles

Service-level computation in time-varying queueing system with priorities: Application to physician staffing in the emergency department

For many service systems, waiting time is a critical performance indicator of customer experience. This study addresses service-level computation techniques in a time-varying mixed-preemptive priorities queueing system. This queuing system has two distinguishing characteristics. First, it has time-varying arrival rates and service capacities. Second, and more importantly, there are multiple classes of customers, and both preemptive and non-preemptive priorities are considered in this system. Combining these two characteristics in a queueing system makes it difficult to compute the service level for each customer class. We derive the exact computation methods for pointwise and piecewise service levels. Furthermore, we propose closed-form expressions to approximate the service levels. Lastly, we show how to apply these service level computation techniques to a real-life physician staffing problem in the emergency department, in which the service levels of each class of patients are considered as constraints. The computational tests are performed using data generated based on real data from a large hospital. The results show that our staffing solutions are better than the hospital’s current staffing solution, guaranteeing patients’ service levels and reducing physicians’ working times.

Racial and survival disparities in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and non-IBC: a population-based study focused on Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders

BackgroundIt is well known that race is an independent predictor of breast cancer mortality and advanced stage at diagnosis. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer and has distinct clinical and biological features. Previous studies have shown that Blacks have a higher incidence of IBC than Whites. However, the proportion of IBC and the role of race on prognosis in Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NH/PI) populations with breast cancer are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to examine the proportion of IBC to non-IBC in NH/PIs and to identify the clinicopathological, biological, and socioeconomic factors associated with the overall survival of NH/PIs compared to other races.MethodsUtilizing a comprehensive cancer registry from the largest hospital in Hawaii, newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the association between race and clinical outcomes. Variables with P-values <0.05 in the univariate analysis and race (variable of interest) were included in a multivariate analysis.ResultsThe cohort included 3691 patients, 60 of whom had IBC. NH/PI race had the highest proportion of IBC compared to other races (3.44%) but was not found to be an independent poor prognostic factor in IBC (HR 1.17 [95%CI 0.26-5.22]). Conversely, NH/PI race was associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with non-IBC (HR 1.65 [95%CI, 1.14-2.39]) along with other factors such as lack of insurance, underinsured status, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, age, and advanced clinical stage.ConclusionsThe findings of this study highlight that NH/PIs had higher rates of IBC and inferior survival in non-IBC compared to other races but not in IBC. It is essential to disaggregate NH/PI race from Asians in future population-based research studies. Further research is needed to understand the factors contributing to higher rates of IBC and poor survival outcomes in NH/PIs with non-IBC as well as targeted interventions to improve breast cancer outcomes in this population to ultimately help improve survival rates and reduce health inequities in NH/PIs with breast cancer.

Multimodal Quality Initiatives in Sepsis Care: Assessing Impact on Core Measures and Outcomes.

Providing timely and effective care for patients with sepsis is challenging due to delays in recognition and intervention. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has developed bundles that have been shown to reduce sepsis mortality. However, hospitals have not consistently adhered to these bundles, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. To address this, a multimodal quality improvement sepsis program was implemented from 2017 to 2022 in a large urban tertiary hospital. The aim of this program was to enhance the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle compliance and reduce sepsis mortality. At baseline, the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle compliance rates were low, at 25%, with a sepsis observed/expected mortality ratio of 1.14. Our interventions included the formation of a multidisciplinary committee, the appointment of sepsis champions, the implementation of sepsis alerts and order sets, the formation of a Code Sepsis team, real-time audits, and peer-to-peer education. By 2022, compliance rose to 62%, and the observed/expected mortality ratio decreased to 0.73. Our approach led to improved outcomes and hospital rankings. These findings underscore the efficacy of a comprehensive sepsis care initiative, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. A multimodal hospital-wide sepsis performance program is feasible and can contribute to improved outcomes. However, further research is necessary to determine the specific impact of individual strategies on sepsis outcomes.

Behavioral skills training for teaching safety skills to mental health service providers compared to training-as-usual: a pragmatic randomized control trial.

Violence in the healthcare workplace has been a global concern for over two decades, with a high prevalence of violence towards healthcare workers reported. Workplace violence has become a healthcare quality indicator and embedded in quality improvement initiatives of many healthcare organizations. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Canada's largest mental health hospital, provides all clinical staff with mandated staff safety training for self-protection and team-control skills. These skills are to be used as a last resort when a patient is at imminent risk of harm to self or others. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two training methods of this mandated staff safety training for workplace violence in a large psychiatric hospital setting. Using a pragmatic randomized control trial design, this study compares two approaches to teaching safety skills CAMH's training-as-usual (TAU) using the 3D approach (description, demonstration and doing) and behavioural skills training (BST), from the field of applied behaviour analysis, using instruction, modeling, practice and feedback loop. Staff were assessed on three outcome measures (competency, mastery and confidence), across three time points: before training (baseline), immediately after training (post-training) and one month later (follow-up). This study was registered with the ISRCTN registry on 06/09/2023 (ISRCTN18133140). With a sample size of 99 new staff, results indicate that BST was significantly better than TAU in improving observed performance of self-protection and team-control skills. Both methods were associated with improved skills and confidence. However, there was a decrease in skill performance levels at the one-month follow-up for both methods, with BST remaining higher than TAU scores across all three time points. The impact of training improved staff confidence in both training methods and remained high across all three time points. The study findings suggest that BST is more effective than TAU in improving safety skills among healthcare workers. However, the retention of skills over time remains a concern, and therefore a single training session without on-the-job-feedback or booster sessions based on objective assessments of skill may not be sufficient. Further research is needed to confirm and expand upon these findings in different settings.

Evaluation of the Treatment Duration of Japanese Patients With Pancreatic Cancer in a Real-World Setting Using a Large Hospital Claims Database: The SUISEI Study.

To clarify the treatment reality of pancreatic cancer in Japan, focusing on treatment duration and time to death. We retrospectively analyzed Japanese hospital claims data for patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between April 2009 and October 2018 to investigate treatment patterns, duration of first-line chemotherapy, and time to death. Of 81,185 eligible patients, 54.2% were male, the mean age was 71.7 years, and 23.3% (n = 18,884) received chemotherapy as primary treatment. The median treatment duration was 14.1 weeks for the 6.7% of patients who received oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX; recommended first-line regimen) and 16.9 weeks for the 30.2% of patients who received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM + nab-PTX). Time to death for patients who received FOLFIRINOX or GEM + nab-PTX was similar (15.4 and 14.8 months, respectively). The duration of first-line chemotherapy regimens tended to increase annually for both regimens. The time to death for all first-line chemotherapy regimens also increased annually. This study revealed the treatment reality of pancreatic cancer in the real-world Japanese setting. Treatment duration and time to death tended to increase over time and did not differ numerically between FOLFIRINOX and GEM + nab-PTX.

Clinical and Biomedical Applications of Lensless Holographic Microscopy

AbstractMany clinical procedures and biomedical research workflows rely on microscopy, including diagnosis of cancer, genetic disorders, autoimmune diseases, infections, and quantification of cell culture. Despite its widespread use, traditional image acquisition and review by trained microscopists is often lengthy and expensive, limited to large hospitals or laboratories, precluding use in point‐of‐care settings. In contrast, lensless or lensfree holographic microscopy (LHM) is inexpensive and widely deployable because it can achieve performance comparable to expensive and bulky objective‐based benchtop microscopes while relying on components that cost only a few hundred dollars or less. Lab‐on‐a‐chip integration is practical and enables LHM to be combined with single‐cell isolation, sample mixing, and in‐incubator imaging. Additionally, many manual tasks in conventional microscopy are instead computational in LHM, including image focusing, stitching, and classification. Furthermore, LHM offers a field of view hundreds of times greater than that of conventional microscopy without sacrificing resolution. Here, the basic LHM principles are summarized, as well as recent advances in artificial intelligence integration and enhanced resolution. How LHM is applied to the above clinical and biomedical applications is discussed in detail. Finally, emerging clinical applications, high‐impact areas for future research, and some current challenges facing widespread adoption are identified.

Identifying solutions to minimize meal tray waste: A mixed-method approach

Background & aimsOver $150,000 are lost annually due to meal tray waste in a large hospital in the United States. This study aims to explore the root causes of meal tray waste within a decentralized foodservice model and strategies to mitigate waste. MethodsA mixed methods sequential explanatory design was used by first identifying hospital units high and low in meal tray waste using recorded food management data from January 2021 through September 2022, then conducting observations, mobile-interviews (n=16), and in-depth interviews with hospital foodservice staff (n=6) and nurses (n=6) in each unit. Lastly, hospital and topic experts (n=10) were engaged in strategizing solutions to reduce meal tray waste. ResultsFindings indicate meal tray waste is increased when patients discharge and when standard trays (i.e., also known as house trays, which include items not requested by patients) are provided. Meal tray waste points to the unpredictability in a hospital that often arises due to patient circumstances, lack of coordination between nursing and foodservice staff, patients' food preferences, and the need for system and workflow improvements in a decentralized foodservice model. ConclusionsFindings highlight considerations that may be applicable across diverse medical institutions seeking to reduce meal tray waste. Hospitals should choose the best foodservice model that suits their institution to manage operations efficiently, focusing on reducing waste, cost optimization, patient satisfaction, and sustainability.

Code Crimson: A Postpartum Hemorrhage Bundled Intervention Quality Improvement Project.

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternity mortality in the United States. The Code Crimson project aimed to enhance PPH management by implementing a standardized intervention bundle to mitigate morbidity and mortality associated with PPH. At a large Philadelphia tertiary hospital, health disparities existed for severe maternal morbidity and mortality, and PPH was a significant factor. A quality improvement design, using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and interrupted time series analysis, was undertaken. The Code Crimson project implemented a standardized bundle to manage PPH, including blood product administration and massive transfusion protocol activation. After implementing the Code Crimson bundle, there was a significant decrease in blood product use (P <.001), with minor reductions in packed red blood cell administration over 4 units and mean blood loss. The Code Crimson bundle effectively reduced blood product utilization for PPH treatment.

Efficiency of therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill systemic rheumatologic diseases: A single-center 9-year experience.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), an effective method to eliminate harmful soluble mediators associated with tissue injury, serves as a crucial intervention for systemic rheumatologic diseases (SRDs). However, its value in critically ill SRDs remains uncertain. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TPE in SRDs. Critically ill SRD patients admitted to the department of intensive care unit of a large tertiary hospital receiving TPE from January 2011 to December 2019 were included. A total of 91 critically ill SRD patients received TPE were enrolled. Their mean age was 47.67 ± 16.35 years with a female predominance (n = 68). Significant decrease in SOFA score post-TPE treatment was observed (p < 0.05). There were no TPE-related fatalities. Improvement was observed in 64 (70.32%) patients. This study shows favorable clinical outcomes. TPE may be an acceptable treatment option for critically ill SRD patients.

Operationalizing open and restricted-access data—Formulating verifiable criteria for the openness of data sets mentioned in biomedical research articles

Abstract Increasing the availability of research data sets is a goal of many stakeholders in science, and monitoring related practices requires definitions of the entity in question. There are several, largely overlapping, definitions for open data. However, they have so far not been translated into operationalizations that would allow us to detect, in a structured and reproducible way, whether, for a specific research article, the underlying data have been shared. Here, we propose a detailed set of criteria to enable such assessments, focusing on biomedical research. We have used these criteria to distribute performance-oriented funding at a large university hospital and to monitor data sharing practices in a dashboard. In addition to fully open data, we include separate criteria for data sets with restricted access, which we also reward. The criteria are partly inspired by the FAIR principles, particularly findability and accessibility, but do not map onto individual principles. The criteria attribute open data status in a binary fashion, both to individual data sets and, ultimately, articles with which they were shared. The criteria allow a verifiable assessment, based on automated and manual screening steps, which we have implemented and validated, as described elsewhere. Here, we focus conceptually on assessing the presence of shared data.

Evaluation of sex inequity in lung-cancer-specific survival.

Whether sex is an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer survival is the subject of ongoing debate. Both large national registries and single hospital studies have shown conflicting findings. In this study, we explore the impact of sex on lung-cancer-specific survival in an unselected population that is well-characterized with respect to stage and other covariates. All patients diagnosed with lung cancer at a single hospital serving a whole and defined region in Southern Norway during the 10 years 2007-2016 were included. Follow-up data were available for at least 56 months for all patients. Analyses were adjusted for stage, treatment, performance status, smoking, age, histology, epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/immunotherapy treatment and period. Differences in lung-cancer-specific survival by sex were explored using restricted mean survival times (RMST). Of the 1,261 patients diagnosed with lung cancer, 596 (47%) were females and 665 (53%) males, with mean ages of 68.5 and 69.5 years, respectively. The observed 5-year lung-cancer-specific survival rate was 27.4% (95% CI 23.7, 31.2) in females and 21.4% (95% CI 18.2, 24.8) in males. However, after adjustment for covariates, no significant differences by sex were observed. The 5-year RMST was 0.9 months shorter (95% CI -2.1, 0.31, p = 0.26) in males compared to females. In this cohort, sex was not associated with a difference in lung-cancer-specific survival after adjusting for clinical and biological factors. Imbalance in stage at diagnosis was the main contributor to the observed difference in lung-cancer-specific survival by sex.

Prevalence of Work-Related Repetitive Stress Injuries amongst the Health Care Workers in Large Tertiary Care Hospital

Prevalence of Work-Related Repetitive Stress Injuries amongst the Health Care Workers in Large Tertiary Care Hospital

The Effects of Displaying the Time Targets of the Manchester Triage System to Emergency Department Personnel: Prospective Crossover Study.

The use of triage systems such as the Manchester Triage System (MTS) is a standard procedure to determine the sequence of treatment in emergency departments (EDs). When using the MTS, time targets for treatment are determined. These are commonly displayed in the ED information system (EDIS) to ED staff. Using measurements as targets has been associated with a decline in meeting those targets. This study investigated the impact of displaying time targets for treatment to physicians on processing times in the ED. We analyzed the effects of displaying time targets to ED staff on waiting times in a prospective crossover study, during the introduction of a new EDIS in a large regional hospital in Germany. The old information system version used a module that showed the time target determined by the MTS, while the new system version used a priority list instead. Evaluation was based on 35,167 routinely collected electronic health records from the preintervention period and 10,655 records from the postintervention period. Electronic health records were extracted from the EDIS, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized additive models. We evaluated the effects of the intervention on waiting times and the odds of achieving timely treatment according to the time targets set by the MTS. The average ED length of stay and waiting times increased when the EDIS that did not display time targets was used (average time from admission to treatment: preintervention phase=median 15, IQR 6-39 min; postintervention phase=median 11, IQR 5-23 min). However, severe cases with high acuity (as indicated by the triage score) benefited from lower waiting times (0.15 times as high as in the preintervention period for MTS1, only 0.49 as high for MTS2). Furthermore, these patients were less likely to receive delayed treatment, and we observed reduced odds of late treatment when crowding occurred. Our results suggest that it is beneficial to use a priority list instead of displaying time targets to ED personnel. These time targets may lead to false incentives. Our work highlights that working better is not the same as working faster.

Adult psychiatric inpatient admissions and length of stay before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large urban hospital setting in Vancouver, British Columbia

IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic individuals with mental illnesses faced challenges accessing psychiatric care. Our study aimed to describe patient characteristics and compare admissions and length of stay (LOS) for psychiatric-related hospitalizations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using health administrative data comparing individuals with an acute psychiatric admission between two time periods: 1st March 2019 to 31st December 2019 (pre-COVID) and 1st March 2020 to 31st December 2020 (during-COVID). Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to model the association between most responsible diagnosis type and the two-time periods to hospital LOS, reporting the Rate Ratio (RR) as the measure of effect.ResultsThe cohort comprised 939 individuals who were predominately male (60.3%) with a severe mental illness (schizophrenia or mood-affective disorder) (72.7%) and a median age of 38 (IQR: 28.0, 52.0) years. In the multivariable analysis, anxiety disorders (RR: 0.63, CI: 0.4, 0.99) and personality disorders (RR: 0.52, CI: 0.32, 0.85) were significantly associated with a shorter LOS when compared to individuals without those disorders. Additionally, when compared to hospital admissions for non-substance related disorders the LOS for patients with substance-related disorders were significantly shorter during the COVID period (RR: 0.45, CI: 0.30, 0.67) and pre-COVID period (RR: 0.31, CI: 0.21, 0.46).ConclusionsWe observed a significant difference in the type and length of admissions for various psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 period. These findings can support systems of care in adapting to utilization changes during pandemics or other global health events.

Accuracy and completeness of registry-reported unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision.

The key outcome of joint registries is revision events, which inform clinical practice and identify poor-performing implants. Registries record revision events and reasons, but accuracy may be limited by a lack of standardized definitions of revision. Our study aims to assess the accuracy and completeness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision and indications reported to the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) with independent clinical review. Case record review of 2272 patients undergoing primary UKA at four large tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2017 was performed, identifying 158 patients who underwent revision. Detailed review of clinical findings, radiographs and operative data was performed to identify revision cases and the reasons for revision using a standardized protocol. These were compared to NZJR data using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. The NZJR recorded 150 (95%) of all UKA revisions. Osteoarthritis progression was the most common reason on the systematic clinical review (35%), however, this was underreported to the registry (8%, P < 0.001). A larger proportion of revisions reported to the registry were for 'pain' (30% of cases vs. 5% on clinical review, P < 0.001). A reason for revision was not reported to the registry for 10% of cases. The NZJR had good capture of UKA revisions, but had significant differences in registry-reported revision reasons compared to our independent systematic clinical review. These included over-reporting of 'pain', under-reporting of osteoarthritis progression, and failing to identify a revision reason. Efforts to improve registry capture of revision reasons for UKA could be addressed through more standardized definitions of revision and tailored revision options for UKA on registry forms.

Antibiotic regimens tailored by clinical pharmacist supported by intensivist enhance rational use of antibiotics

ABSTRACT Background High antibiotics utility rates have been observed in surgical intensive care units (SICU). The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of engaging a clinical pharmacist in SICU on rational use of antibiotic treatment. Methods This retrospective quasi-experimental experiment involved 505 patients, over a period of one year, admitted to emergency department surgical/trauma ICU of a large tertiary care hospital. Before and during pharmacist participation periods of six months, 226 and 153 patients, respectively, are compared. Results Antibiotics consumption pattern changed with a decrease in total antibiotic consumption from 101.42 to 94.1 Defined Daily Dose/100 patients’ days after the clinical pharmacist participation, in addition to, a statistically significant rise (p = 0.001) in percentage of appropriateness of the prescribed antibiotic therapy from 72.1% to 86.3%. Time to control infection (days) was not statistically different (p = 0.825) in both periods. The average ICU days of stay was statistically significant longer (p = 0.046) during pharmacist attendance (4.42 ± 5.61) in comparison with period without pharmacist attendance (3.31 ± 3.66). The difference in ICU mortality rate was not statistically significance (p = 0.217). Cost per stay increased by 65% during pharmacist intervention period. Conclusions Antibiotic management with pharmacist participation as a part of multidisciplinary team with intensivist can promote rate of the appropriateness of the prescribed antibiotic therapy, lower utility of antibiotic consumption, but with a longer ICU stay, no mortality reduction, and higher expenses per stay. Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04931914.

Longitudinal changes in hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, Dominican Republic

Hand hygiene (HH) can reduce transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in healthcare facilities and is especially important in low- and middle-income countries where HH infrastructure may be insufficient and the burden of HAIs is highest. At baseline, we assessed HH infrastructure and practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) at two large hospitals in the Dominican Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCWs were observed for HH adherence (HHA) (defined as the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or handwashing with soap and water) before and after patient contact and donning new gloves before patient contact. The baseline assessment was repeated following implementation of local production and distribution of ABHR and a HH promotion campaign. Descriptive analyses and regression models evaluated predictors of HHA and glove use. Cumulative HHA was 18.9%. While patient-care areas with a functional HH resource increased from 47% at baseline to 92% after the intervention, HHA declined from 23.0% to 16.7%. HHA was higher after patient contact (aOR = 5.88; 95% CI = 4.17–8.33), during a period of increased COVID-19 risk (aOR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.05–2.77), during invasive patient contacts (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.23–2.17) and when gloves were not used (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01–1.56). The negative association between glove use and HHA diminished when access to HH resources increased. New gloves were donned before 39.6% of patient contacts. Glove use was higher among nurses (aOR = 7.12; 95% CI = 3.02–16.79) and during invasive contacts (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI = 2.27–10.0). While access to HH resources increased after the interventions, HHA did not increase. HHA was lower when COVID-19 risk was lower. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to increase HHA among HCWs.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Death in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Population: Data Analysis from a Large General Hospital in Anhui, China.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical prevention, early diagnosis, and hematological monitoring were challenging areas.This study aims to comparerisk factors and hematological and biochemical data in non-survivor group patientswith COVID-19 versus survivor group patients.A total of 204 patients with COVID-19 were selected as research subjects from December 2022 to January 2023. We analyzed the age, sex, time from onset to admission, and laboratory test indicators upon admission. The differences between surviving and deceased patients and mortality-related risk factors were examined. Among the 204 patients, 168 survived, whereas 36 died during hospitalization. Significant differences were observed between the two groups with COVID-19 across various factors, including age (p < 0.0001), WBC count (p < 0.0001), RBC count (p < 0.05), neutrophils (p < 0.0001), lymphocytes (p < 0.05), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (p < 0.0001), RBC distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD) (p < 0.0001), RBC distribution width coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) (p < 0.0001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p < 0.05), albumin (ALB) (p < 0.0001), creatinine (CR) (p < 0.0001), uric acid (UA) (p < 0.0001), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p < 0.0001), plasma thrombin time (TT) (p < 0.05), prothrombin time (PT) (p < 0.0001), and D-dimer (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that older age, CR, UA, and ALB were independent factors associated with death (p < 0.05).Elderly patients with underlying diseases, abnormal routine blood test indices, and abnormal renal function and coagulation indices are at an increased worse prognosisand should be identified early. Age, UA, CR, and ALB can be used as predictors to assess the worse prognosisin the hospital.

ACCURACY OF REGISTRY-REPORTED REASONS FOR UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION

IntroductionA key outcome measured by national joint registries are revision events. This informs best practice and identifies poor-performing surgical devices. Although registry data often record reasons for revision arthroplasty, interpretation is limited by lack of standardised definitions of revision reasons and objective assessment of radiologic and laboratory parameters. Our study aim was to compare reasons for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision reported to the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) with reasons identified by independent clinical review.MethodsA total of 2,272 patients undergoing primary medial and lateral UKA at four large tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2017 were included. A total of 158 patients underwent subsequent revision with mean follow-up of 8 years. A systematic review of clinical findings, radiographs and operative data was performed to identify revision cases and to determine the reasons for revision using a standardised protocol. These were compared to reasons reported to the NZJR using Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests.ResultsOsteoarthritis progression was the most common reason for revision on systematic clinical review (30%), however this was underreported to the registry (4%, p&lt;0.001). A larger proportion of revisions reported to the registry were for ‘unexplained pain’ (30% of cases vs. 4% on clinical review, p&lt;0.001). A reason for revision was not reported to the registry for 24 (15%) of cases.Discussion and ConclusionWe found significant inaccuracies in registry-reported reasons for revision following UKA. These included over-reporting of ‘unexplained pain’, under-reporting of osteoarthritis progression, and failure to identify a reason for revision. Efforts to improve registry capture of revision reasons for UKA should focus on increasing accuracy in these three areas. This could be addressed through standardised recording methods and tailored revision reason options for UKA for surgeons to select when recording the reasons.

Peri-anesthetic environmental and occupational exposure to desflurane waste anesthetic gas in a large animal veterinary hospital.

The goals were to determine the environmental levels of desflurane waste anesthetic gas and the desflurane occupational exposure of operating room staff during the anesthesia of large animal veterinary patients. Active environmental sampling was performed using single-beam infrared spectrophotometry. Passive sampling with dosimeter badges was used to measure the occupational exposure of anesthesia and operating room staff. Higher concentrations of desflurane (n = 16) were measured at all recovery timepoints relative to the concentrations measured at all locations and timepoints at the start of anesthesia and surgery (p < 0.05). Time-weighted average desflurane concentrations from dosimeter badges (n = 310) were higher for anesthesia staff than for other operating room personnel (p < 0.0001). The anesthetic recovery of large animal patients is a period of increased exposure to desflurane waste anesthetic gas for veterinary staff.