Large Hill-Sachs Lesion Research Articles

High Rate of Return to Sport in Contact and Collision Athletes After Arthroscopic Latarjet With Cortical Button Fixation

Background: Contact and collision athletes face a higher risk of recurrent anterior shoulder instability after surgical stabilization. The Latarjet procedure is often preferred given the high incidence of bony lesions. However, this stabilizing procedure, performed either open or arthroscopically, is met with concerns regarding complications and revision surgery rates. Purpose: To evaluate the return to sport (RTS) and assess complication and instability recurrence rates in contact/collision athletes undergoing the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using a guided technique with suture buttons for coracoid fixations. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on contact/collision athletes who underwent the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between January 2011 and March 2018. All patients were operated on arthroscopically using glenoid and coracoid guides and suture button fixation of the transferred coracoid. RTS was defined as the patient being able to participate in his or her activity without any restriction postoperatively. Two independent observers assessed patients using postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to evaluate coracoid positioning and healing. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors associated with persistent apprehension. A group comparison was performed to assess RTS failure risk factors. Results: In 136 contact/collision athletes (mean age, 25 ± 7 years), 93% were satisfied, and 98% achieved shoulder stability at a mean follow-up of 60 months (range, 24-117 months). No suture button–related complications or neurovascular issues were reported. Overall, 82% (112/136) returned to contact/collision sports. The mean time to RTS was 5.3 ± 1.2 months (range, 3-7.3 months). In a CT study performed 2 weeks after surgery, 87% (118/136) of bone grafts were positioned below the equator and 93% (126/136) were flush to the glenoid surface. At the 6-month postoperative CT examination, complete bone block healing was achieved in 84% (114/136). On clinical examination at the latest follow-up, 36 patients (26%) reported some anterior apprehension on testing. On multivariate analysis, patients with severe humeral bone defects (medium to large Hill-Sachs lesions, Calandra grade 2 or 3) had a higher risk of postoperative persistent apprehension. On group comparison, a visual analog scale score >3 and persistent anterior apprehension were found to be associated with failure of RTS. Conclusion: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with suture button fixation allowed 82% of athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability to return to contact or collision sports. Patients with severe humeral bone defects have a higher risk of persistent anterior apprehension and decreased RTS. The arthroscopic-guided procedure with suture button fixation is safe; accurate, with a high rate of anatomic graft positioning and healing; and reliable, with a low recurrence rate.

The Trillat procedure: the man and the technique revisited through the lens of arthroscopy.

The Trillat procedure, initially described by Albert Trillat, is historically one of the first techniques for addressing recurrent anterior shoulder instability, incorporating fascinating biomechanical mechanisms. After lowering, medializing, and fixing the coracoid process to the glenoid neck, the subcoracoid space is reduced, the subscapularis lowered, and its line of pull changed, accentuating the function of the subscapularis as a humeral head depressor centering the glenohumeral joint. Furthermore, the conjoint tendon creates a 'seatbelt' effect, preventing anteroinferior humeral head dislocation. Even though contemporary preferences lean towards arthroscopic Bankart repair with optional remplissage, bone augmentation, and the Latarjet procedure, enduring surgical indications remain valid for the Trillat procedure, which offers joint preservation and superior outcomes in two distinct scenarios: (i) older patients with massive irreparable cuff tears and anterior recurrent instability with an intact subscapularis tendon regardless of the extent of glenoid bone loss; (ii) younger patients with instability associated shoulder joint capsule hyperlaxity without concomitant injuries (glenoid bone loss, large Hill-Sachs lesion). Complications associated with the Trillat procedure include recurrent anterior instability, potential overtightening of the coracoid, leading to pain and a significant reduction in range of motion, risk of subcoracoid impingement, and restriction of external rotation by up to 10°, a limitation that is generally well-tolerated. The Trillat procedure may be an effective alternative technique for specific indications and should remain part of the surgical armamentarium for addressing anterior shoulder instability.

Comparing Access to Engaging Hill-Sachs Lesions Between the Modified Posterior Deltoid Split Approach and Standard Deltopectoral Approach for Bone Grafting.

Hill-Sachs lesions are common after shoulder instability, and treatment options vary but include remplissage or implantation of structural bone graft. Large Hill-Sachs lesions not addressed by remplissage are challenging to manage and may frequently require an open surgical approach for bone filling treatment options. The optimal approach to maximize visualization of the humeral head during these procedures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the area of the humeral head accessed using a modified posterior deltoid split approach versus a standard deltopectoral approach without surgical dislocation, with particular attention to access of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions for the purpose of bone grafting in the setting of anterior shoulder instability. It was hypothesized that both approaches would provide equal access to a simulated Hill-Sachs lesion. Controlled laboratory study. Four human cadaveric shoulders were mounted in the beach-chair position. The modified posterior deltoid split approach and nonextensile deltopectoral approaches were performed. A typical Hill-Sachs lesion was simulated on the humeri. The percentage of the total surface area of the humeral head that was accessed, including access to the simulated Hill-Sachs lesion, was mapped using 3-dimensional digitizing software. The deltopectoral approach provided 45% ± 15.2% access (range, 24% to 58%) to the humeral head versus 22.2% ± 6.1% (range, 17% to 30%) for the modified posterior deltoid split approach (P = .057). The modified posterior deltoid split approach enabled 100% access of the simulated Hill-Sachs lesion compared with 0% for the nonextensile deltopectoral approach. The angle of access to the articular surface was direct and perpendicular with the modified posterior deltoid split approach. The overall surface area of the humeral head accessed via the modified posterior deltoid split approach was less compared with the deltopectoral approach; however, the entire area of a typical Hill-Sachs lesion was able to be accessed from the modified posterior deltoid split approach, whereas this area was not well visualized from the standard deltopectoral approach. The modified posterior deltoid split approach provided sufficient access to the humeral head for the purposes of grafting an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion in the setting of anterior shoulder instability.

Arthroscopic-Controlled Reduction of Hill-Sachs Lesions: Treatment Option for Off-Track Lesions in Young Patients?

Large Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL) are currently treated via a remplissage procedure. Although the good stabilizing properties of this surgery are apparent, there are some disadvantages in terms of the functional outcome. In the following Technical Note, we present a method of arthroscopic-controlled reduction of HSL for anatomical restoration of the humeral head without functional limitations. For HSL reduction, we place a 1.6-mm K-wire in the central lesion under arthroscopic and fluoroscopic control from posterior to anterior in lateral drilling direction. Then, a 7-mm cannulated drill is used for preparing the reduction canal. Afterward, the HSL is reduced via bone tamp, also under arthroscopic and fluoroscopic control. No bone substitution material is used to fill the canal; only a standard wound closure is performed. Arthroscopic-controlled reduction of impacted humeral head fractures seems to be a possible and relatively easy way to perform an anatomical restoration of HSLs. Because the exact location of HSLs can vary slightly, the exact surgical setting might be slightly different each time. Biomechanical studies already show similar stabilizing properties of this procedure compared with established techniques but without losing external rotation. Further studies need to review the potential rate of humeral head necrosis or secondary loss of reduction.

The open Latarjet-Patte procedure for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability in professional handball players at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years

The popularity of team handball is increasing with over 10 million children playing this overhead, throwing and collision sport with highest demands on the shoulder joint. Due to the risk for recurrent instability, the Latarjet-Patte (LP) procedure has been recommended to treat young competitive players. This is the first LP outcome study in professional handball. We included 20 shoulders retrospectively (18 players/17 males/mean age 22.9 years, range 17-35 years; minimum/mean follow-up: 2/6.6 years) operated on by three expert surgeons (2011-2020) with Walch's LP-technique. Preoperative hyperlaxity (25%/n=5), affected throwing arm (55%/n=11), position (backcourt, winger, goalkeeper: 22% each; full back, pivot: 17% each), >2 dislocations prior (20%/n=4), >10 dislocations (5%/n=1), previous failed Bankart/HAGL repair (10%/n=2) and large Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL: 20%/n=4) were documented. Clinical and radiographic outcomes, visual analogue scale (VAS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), Walch-Duplay (WDS), Rowe score (RS) and return to sports (RTS) parameter were recorded. RTS was 85% (n=17/20), RTS to same-level 80% (n=16/20), RTS with no throwing pain 73% (n=8/11), time to training with ball: 3.2/12 and to competition 4.9/12. The mean RS, WDS and SSV were 90, 88, 89 % respectively. Shoulder symptoms lead to giving up handball in 2 cases (10%). One player (5%) stopped for other reasons. One recurrent dislocation (5%) was recorded (non-throwing arm, winger, no recurrence after rehabilitation). Persistent apprehension occurred in one goalkeeper (5%). Four shoulders showed residual pain (20%) relieved in one by screw removal. Resistant pain (throwing shoulder) was seen in 2 backcourt players (10%/one large HSL) and one goal keeper (5%/large HSL; >10 dislocations prior), all three >30years of age. Bone block positioning was correct (no lateral overhang) in all shoulders. One shoulder (5%) showed mild arthritic changes at final follow-up (>10 dislocations, large HSL). The open Latarjet-Patte is consistent in providing shoulder stability combined with return to throwing performance in professional handball players with a short time to RTS and high same-level RTS rate without increasing the risk of arthritic changes. Throwing shoulders of backcourt players, with large HSL or shoulders at age >30 years may have an increased risk for persistent symptoms.

Pediatric and Adolescent Shoulder Instability.

Traumatic and atraumatic shoulder instability is common in pediatric and adolescent patients. It is well-established that young patients with anterior shoulder dislocation are at high risk of recurrent instability. This review assesses the current literature pertaining to management of both anterior instability and MDI in the pediatric and adolescent populations. Current research suggests that pediatric and adolescent patients with shoulder instability have excellent outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair; however, higher rates of recurrent instability requiring revision surgical management have been identified in patients with more than one dislocation episode pre-operatively, those with Hill-Sachs lesions and those under age 16. The addition of the remplissage procedure to an arthroscopic Bankart repair may be useful in preventing recurrent instability for patients with large Hill-Sachs lesions. Open procedures with bony glenoid augmentation may be indicated in patients with significant glenoid bone loss, or those who have failed primary surgical management, with promising outcomes reported following the Latarjet coracoid process transfer procedure in the adolescent population. Pediatric and adolescent patients with hyperlaxity, and those participating in swimming or gymnastics are more likely to have multidirectional instability (MDI). Non-surgical management with physical therapy is the mainstay of treatment for MDI with positive outcomes reported overall. In young patients with MDI who continue to have symptoms of instability and pain that effects daily activities or sports despite an adequate and appropriate course of rehabilitation, surgical management with capsulorrhaphy may be considered, with promising outcomes reported for both open and arthroscopic techniques. Attentive selection of timing and surgical procedure for pediatric and adolescent patients with anterior shoulder instability may help to prevent recurrent instability following shoulder stabilization. Although most pediatric and adolescent patients with MDI do well following non-surgical management alone, those that fail conservative management have good outcomes following arthroscopic or open capsulorrhaphy.

Bulk osteochondral allograft for massive Hill-Sachs defect combined with Latarjet procedure for bipolar bone loss in anterior instability.

A proportion of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability present with bipolar bone loss comprising large Hill-Sachs lesions and substantial glenoid defect. These are surgically difficult cases to treat. We describe a novel surgical procedure of bulk size-matched osteochondral allograft reconstruction for massive Hill-Sachs lesions combined with the Latarjet procedure for these challenging cases.

Management of Complex and Revision Anterior Shoulder Instability

Treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability has gained significant interest in recent years and involves evaluation of both glenoid and humeral sided bone loss. Decision making is more complex in patients with significant humeral or glenoid bone defects or in those who underwent previous instability surgery. Appropriate assessment of the glenoid track is necessary as “off track” lesions typically require treatments beyond arthroscopic labral repair alone. In those with significant humeral or glenoid sided bone loss, the authors recommend three-dimensional computed tomography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging for accurate evaluation. The Glenoid Track Instability Management Score is a useful guide to help direct treatment by using the glenoid track as well as other known risk factors for recurrence. In circumstances with significant glenoid bone loss, typically over 20%, a coracoid transfer such as the Latarjet is recommended. In patients that previously failed a coracoid transfer, the authors recommend a distal tibia allograft; however, distal clavicle and iliac crest autograft have also been reported to have high success rates. In those with large Hill-Sachs lesions, remplissage or bone grafting are recommended. An estimation of the postoperative glenoid track after glenoid bone augmentation is required for appropriate Hill-Sachs lesion treatment. The authors typically recommend against revision instability surgical treatment with arthroscopic repair alone.

Results of Arthroscopic Remplissage with Bankart Repair for the Management of Glenohumeral Instability with Hill-Sachs Bone Defect

Glenohumeral joint instability is one of the commonest disorders of the shoulder as it has a great range of motion on the expense of stability as refered to the bony configuration of the joint. Instability may be traumatic or atraumatic and uni-directional or multidirectional with wide range of patient complaints from mild pain in micro-instability to obvious dislocation. The most commonly used arthroscopic procedure include filling the humeral head defect by capsulo-tenodesis of the infraspinatus tendon and posterior capsule (Remplissage). The aim of this study was to present our results of Bankart repair and Reimplissage in management of recurrent shoulder instability with Hill-Sachs lesions. 20 young, middle age and fit patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with combined Bankart lesion and Hill-Sachs lesion. All Hill-Sachs lesions were large or engaging (Calandra grade 3 at time of arthroscopy) and all were managed by arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with Remplissage. When compared to pre-operative ROM, a statistically significant difference was found in the mean increase of anterior elevation by 2°, external rotation (ER) side by 4◦ and 5° for ER at 90° abduction at final follow-up (p value < 0.001). There were statistically significant difference in the mean decrease of 5° and 10° in ER side and ER at 90° abduction respectively at final follow-up compared to normal side ROM (p value < 0.001), also significant decrease in anterior elevation by 4° and IR at 90° abduction by 2° (p value < 0.001) which were not comparable to other studies but was clinically insignificant. The mean final Rowe and SST scores were 85 and 11.35 respectively indicating a statistically significant difference in mean increase of both the total Rowe and total SST percentage score when compared to pre-operative scores (p value < 0.001). All patients were followed prospectively for a minimum of 12 months. Conclusion: arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage is an effective means of managing shoulder instability in patients with large Hill-Sachs lesions and no significant glenoid bony defect.

Hill-Sachs Remplissage Procedure and its Role in Arthroscopic Stabilisation of the Shoulder

The arthroscopic Hill-Sachs Remplissage procedure was first described in 2004 and published in 2008. It consists of an arthroscopic posterior capsulodesis combined with an infraspinatus tenodesis to achieve a “filling in” effect of posterior humeral head defects. The technique was put forward as a solution to high rates of Bankart repair failure, in the presence of large Hill-Sachs lesions. We describe the evolution of the technique and its outcomes and report on the evolving surgical indications over the last decade in response to new paradigm shifts. Due to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of shoulder instability, emphasis was given to both Bankart soft tissue repair and to the associated bony injuries, accounting for both glenoid and humeral head (bipolar) bone loss. We present the transition from the concept of “engaging” Hill-Sachs lesions to the concept of “on-track” / “off-track” lesions and the current role of Remplissage in shoulder instability surgery which remains paramount. We believe that in view of the critical role of bipolar bone defects in shoulder instability, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the glenoid track of Hill-Sachs lesions is becoming increasingly important in preoperative planning. This allows the orthopaedic surgeon to detect an “off-track” lesion, select the appropriate surgical technique and improve surgical outcomes.

Open Latarjet-Patte Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: Critical Steps and Pearls for the Walch Technique

Background: Latarjet is a term used for different techniques and modifications to expose the glenoid and to transfer and fix the coracoid. The procedure is intricate and technically demanding. Outcomes and complications are heterogeneous in the literature. A master technique, the Walch technique, has been practiced for decades, with outstanding long-term results and patient satisfaction. Indications: Documented anterior dislocations with evidence for emergency reduction, with or without hyperlaxity and confirmation of a traumatic capsuloligamentous lesion. Contraindications include voluntary dislocations and multidirectional instability without these criteria. The Instability Severity Index Score can guide decision making on whether Bankart surgery is sufficient. Large Hill-Sachs lesions may be an indication for additional remplissage. Technique Description: Three key maneuvers and 6 surgical stages need to be mastered for consistent results. Key maneuvers include: (1) arm positioning for all stages, (2) retractor placement, and (3) safe conjoint tendon releases. Six key stages include: (1) coracoid exposure and initial release; (2) osteotomy and subsequent release; (3) bone preparation; (4) subscapularis split and arthrotomy; (5) 360° scapula neck exposure; and (6) cornerstone drill hole positioning, fixation, and simple capsuloplasty. Specific arm positioning facilitates coracoid exposure, releases, subscapularis split, arthrotomy, and retractor insertion, as well as capsular repair. A 360° anterior scapula neck exposure is crucial to drill the inferior cornerstone hole (2.5 for 4.0 partially threaded cancellous screw) 7 mm medial to the articular surface with mandatory direction parallel to the articular surface. The bone block can be dialed to the exact position, preventing lateral overhang. The capsule is closed to the coracoacromial ligament stump in 45° of external rotation. Results: A series of &gt;80 cases with minimum 1-year follow-up (range: 1-5 years) demonstrated excellent results. Outcomes were good to excellent (Subjective Shoulder Value &gt;80% in 95% of cases; Constant score &gt;90% and Rowe score &gt; 90%) in keeping with the Walch results (&gt;1000 cases). The complication rate was low: 1 early coracoid fracture (1.3%), no dislocation and neurological complications, no new arthritis or progression, and good coracoid position without lateral overhang. Conclusion: The Walch technique, although technically demanding, provides excellent, consistently reproducible results once the 3 key surgical maneuvers and 6 stages of the procedure are mastered.

Anterior Shoulder Instability Management: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

AbstractAnterior shoulder instability is common in young athletes. Male individuals younger than 20 years who are involved in contact sports are at particular risk of injury and recurrence. Essential imaging includes radiography and magnetic resonance imaging in all patients, with 3-dimensional computed tomography being helpful to evaluate glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions. Evaluation of the glenoid track is essential to help determine appropriate treatment because off-track scenarios in which the Hill-Sachs width is greater than the glenoid width impart a risk of failure with isolated arthroscopic treatment. Associated injuries also must be evaluated, including bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions, humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL), glenolabral articular disruption (GLAD), anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA), rotator cuff injury, other fractures, and axillary nerve injury. Optimal treatment continues to be debated. Conservative management with physical therapy for rotator cuff and periscapular strengthening can be attempted, with the addition of bracing if continued play is desired until the season’s conclusion. Surgical intervention is considered in patients with recurrent dislocations, glenoid bone loss, or large Hill-Sachs lesions or in young athletes involved in contact or high-risk sports. Treatment options include arthroscopic capsulolabral repair with at least 4 anchors if good tissue quality and no bone loss exist. Remplissage has been recommended by some surgeons if a large Hill-Sachs exists. Open repair is suggested in patients with a high number of recurrent dislocations without bone loss or in those who participate in high-risk sports. Coracoid transfer or the Latarjet procedure is suggested in patients with bone loss greater than 20%. Bone grafting for glenoid bone loss using autograft or allograft, such as distal tibial allograft, is recommended in patients with a failed Latarjet procedure or those with significant bone loss. Hill-Sachs lesion grafting may also be beneficial in those with large lesions that engage.

Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation by Coracoid Osteotomy with or without Bristow–Latarjet Procedure

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of the coracoid osteotomy with or without Bristow–Latarjet procedures in the treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation (CASD).MethodsBetween January 2013 and January 2019, 20 shoulders of 18 patients who were diagnosed with chronic anterior dislocation and underwent open reduction in our trauma center were retrospectively studied. Open coracoid osteotomy with Bristow–Latarjet procedures were performed on 16 shoulders and open coracoid osteotomy without Bristow–Latarjet procedures were performed on four shoulders. Open coracoid osteotomy with or without Bristow–Latarjet procedures were chosen on the basis of the stability of the shoulder after reduction. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, and the range of motion (ROM) for shoulder activity.ResultsThere were three males and 15 females with an average age of 60.94 ± 2.69 years. The time between dislocation and treatment ranged from 21 to 240 days with an average of 73.3 ± 14.4 days. All patients were available for a mean follow‐up of 15.2 ± 4.3 months. No procedure‐related death or incision‐related superficial or deep tissue infection was identified in all cases. No iatrogenic neurovascular injuries or fractures were found in this study. At the time of 12 months follow‐up, the range of motion and the shoulder functional evaluation (VAS [P < 0.001], ASES [P < 0.001], and UCLA score [P < 0.001]) in patients who underwent Bristow–Latarjet procedures were significantly improved. Subluxation after surgical procedure was found and confirmed in one patient and this patient refused to undergo revision surgery. According to the Samilson and Prieto classification system, 16 shoulders were assessed as grade 0, three shoulders were grade 1, one shoulder was grade 2.ConclusionsCoracoid osteotomy with or without Bristow–Latarjet procedure yielded an acceptable clinical result in this study. This method has the advantages of enlarging the exposure of surgical field, assisting reduction of shoulder, and convenient conversion to Bristow–Latarjet procedure. It is an efficient and reliable method for treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation.A 69‐year‐old woman diagnosed with right chronic anterior shoulder dislocation with large Hill–Sachs lesion. The latarjet procedure with remplissage technique was applied for this patient.

Large Hill–Sachs Lesion Combined with a Rotator Cuff Tear in an Acute Traumatic Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder in an Elderly Patient Treated with an Allogenic Iliac Tricortical Bone Graft

Large Hill–Sachs Lesion Combined with a Rotator Cuff Tear in an Acute Traumatic Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder in an Elderly Patient Treated with an Allogenic Iliac Tricortical Bone Graft

Osteochondral allograft transplantation for large Hill-Sachs lesions: a retrospective case series with a minimum 2-year follow-up

PurposeTo investigate the clinical outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation for large Hill-Sachs lesions.MethodsPatients who underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation for large Hill-Sachs lesions were identified. Clinical assessment consisted of active range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and patient satisfaction rate. Radiographic assessment was performed with CT scan.ResultsNineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 21.7 years. The mean preoperative size of the Hill-Sachs lesion was 35.70 ± 3.02%. The mean follow-up was 27.8 months. All grafts achieved union at an average of 3.47 months after surgery. At the final follow-up, graft resorption was observed in 43.1% of patients. The average size of residual humeral head articular arc loss was 12.31 ± 2.79%. Significant improvements (P < .001) were observed for the active ROM, ASES score, Constant-Murley score, and Rowe score. The overall satisfaction rate was 94.7%. No significant difference was found between the resorption group and the nonresorption group in postoperative clinical outcomes.ConclusionOsteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful treatment option for patients with large Hill-Sachs lesions. Although the incidence of graft resorption may be relatively high, the clinical outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up are favorable.Level of evidenceLevel IV, case series

Bankart Repair in Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background: Latest studies have shown effective clinical outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) but have shown some risk factors for re-dislocation after surgery. We assessed whether patients are at a risk for re-dislocation during the first year after ABR, examined the recurrence rate after ABR, and sought to recognize new risk factors. Materials and Methods: We performed ABR utilizing bioabsorbable suture anchors in 51 consecutive shoulders (50 patients) with traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Average patient age was 26.5 (range, 15–40) years. We assessed re-dislocation after ABR using patient telephone interviews (follow-up rate, 100%) and correlated re-dislocation with several risk factors. Results: Re-dislocation after ABR occurred in five shoulders (9.8%), of which 4 sustained re-injuries within the first year with the arm elevated at 90° and externally rotated at 90°. Of the remaining 46 shoulders without re-dislocation, 4 had re-injury under the same conditions within the first year. Consequently, re-injury within the first year was a risk for re-dislocation after ABR (P < 0.001, chi-squared test). Using multivariate analysis, large Hill-Sachs lesions (odds ratio, 6.75; 95% CI, 1.35-64.5) and <4 suture anchors (odds ratio, 9.45; 95% CI, 1.88-72.5) were significant risk factors for re-dislocation after ABR. Conclusion: The recurrence rate after ABR was not associated with the time elapsed and that repair strategies should augment the large humeral bone defect and use >3 anchors during ABR.

Arthroscopic Bone Grafting of the Humeral Head for Treatment of a Deep Hill-Sachs Lesion

Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation often leads to the presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion. A large Hill-Sachs lesion compromises shoulder stability and should be addressed with bone augmentation when it is too deep. Here, we introduce a method of arthroscopic bone grafting of the humeral head for the treatment of a deep Hill-Sachs lesion in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Our indication for this procedure is a deep off-track Hill-Sachs lesion measuring at least 8 mm in depth and 10 mm in width. The main steps of this procedure include graft placement via special shoulder bone grafting instruments, graft suspension fixation using suture anchors, and bone fragment compression using the infraspinatus tendon. We routinely use this technique in combined treatment procedures for complicated anterior shoulder instability.

Osteochondral Allografts in Shoulder Surgical Procedures.

The use of fresh osteochondral allografts has become popular in many joint-preserving orthopaedic procedures and shows early promising results within the shoulder. Distal tibial allograft contains a stout cartilaginous layer that appears to have highly congruent curvature and concavity to the glenoid, which makes for an optimal allograft option for instability. In the setting of large Hill-Sachs lesions, the use of a humeral-head osteochondral allograft is essential to restore geometry, stability, and mechanics of the native glenohumeral joint. One must be cautious with the treatment of glenoid chondral lesions with osteoarticular grafting procedures because of the depth of the glenoid compared with the depth of subchondral bone on the graft necessary to achieve a press fit, and advanced imaging is recommended when planning an operative intervention. Optimizing joint-preservation treatment with osteochondral allografts will rely on the long-term results of these procedures, and careful patient selection, preoperative discussion, and realistic expectations are necessary.

Outcomes of The Remplissage Procedure and Its Effects on Return to Sports

Objectives:Short-term outcomes for remplissage patients with large engaging Hill-Sachs lesions have demonstrated good results. However, limited data is available for longer-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of the remplissage and determine the long-term rate of return to specific sports postoperatively.Methods:This was a retrospective review of patients treated with the remplissage procedure from 2007-2013. All had preoperative MRIs demonstrating large Hill-Sachs lesions by Rowe criteria and glenoid bone loss less than 20%. All Hill-Sachs lesions were “off track” by arthroscopic examination and preoperative imaging. At final follow up, patients had a ROM evaluation and were administered a detailed outcomes survey, which included WOSI and ASES as well as questions regarding sports, employment, physical activities and dislocation events.Results:Fifty-one shoulders (50 patients) were included. Average age at surgery was 29.8 years (15.0-72.4 years) and average follow up was 60.7 months (25.5-97.6 months). 20% of patients had previous surgery on their shoulder. Average postoperative WOSI scores were 79.5% and average ASES scores were 89.3. Six shoulders had dislocation events (11.7%) postoperatively: three were traumatic, and three atraumatic. Increasing number of preoperative dislocations increased the risk of a postoperative dislocation (p<0.001). There was also a trend towards higher postoperative dislocation rates in revision patients (p=0.062). Average loss of external rotation was 5.2 degrees (p=0.13). 95.5% of patients returned to one or more sports postoperatively at an average of 7.0 months. 81.0% returned to their previous intensity and level of sport. 65.5% (19) of patients who played a throwing sport stated they had problems throwing. 58.6% (17) felt they could not normally wind up throwing a ball. Direct rates of return for overhead sports were volleyball 100%, basketball 69%, baseball 50% and football 50%.Conclusion:Remplissage’s re-dislocation rate was 11.7% at an average of five years, with 96% of patients returning to full sports at an average of 7 months. For throwing sports, 65.5% complain of decreased range of motion during throwing. The results should be considered preoperatively in remplissage candidates who are engaged in throwing sports.

Outcomes of the Remplissage Procedure and Its Effects on Return to Sports

Background: Short-term outcomes for patients with large, engaging Hill-Sachs lesions who underwent remplissage have demonstrated good results. However, limited data are available for longer term outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of remplissage and determine the long-term rate of return to specific sports postoperatively. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients treated with the remplissage procedure from 2007 to 2013. All underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating large Hill-Sachs lesions by the Rowe criteria and glenoid bone loss <20%. All Hill-Sachs lesions were “off track” by an arthroscopic examination and preoperative imaging. At final follow-up, patients underwent a range of motion evaluation and were administered a detailed outcome survey, which included Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores as well as questions regarding sports, employment, physical activities, and dislocation events. Results: A total of 50 patients (51 shoulders) were included in the study. The average patient age at surgery was 29.8 years (range, 15.0-72.4 years), and the average follow-up time was 60.7 months (range, 25.5-97.6 months); 20.0% of patients underwent previous surgery on their shoulder. The average postoperative WOSI score was 79.5%, and the average ASES score was 89.3. Six shoulders had dislocation events (11.8%) postoperatively: 3 were traumatic, and 3 were atraumatic. Increased preoperative dislocations led to a greater risk of a postoperative dislocation (P < .001). There was also a trend toward higher postoperative dislocation rates in patients who underwent revision (P = .062). The average loss of external rotation was 5.26° (P = .13). The rate of return to ≥1 sports was 95.5% of patients at an average of 7.0 months postoperatively; 81.0% returned to their previous intensity and level of sport. Of patients who played a throwing sport, 65.5% (n = 19) stated that they had problems throwing, and 58.6% (n = 17) felt that they could not normally wind up throwing a ball. Direct rates of return to overhead sports were volleyball, 100%; basketball, 69%; baseball, 50%; and football, 50%. Conclusion: The redislocation rate after remplissage was 11.8% at an average of 5 years, with 95.5% of patients returning to full sports at an average of 7 months. For throwing sports, 65.5% of patients complained of decreased range of motion during throwing. The results should be considered preoperatively in candidates for remplissage who are engaged in throwing sports.