Laparoscopic-assisted Resection Research Articles

Retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results of NOSES technique and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in patients with colorectal cancer.

The aim of research was to study the feasibility and safety of surgery providing specimen extraction through natural orifices in patients with colorectal cancer. This study is a comparative retrospective analysis of findings obtained from 265 patients who underwent surgical treatment using NOSES technique and 275 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted (LA) resection. Data included preoperative patients' information, intraoperative findings, results of postoperative pathological examination of surgical specimens, early postoperative period analysis, and follow-up. Both groups were comparable in terms of gender, age and BMI. The duration of surgery was similar in both groups (p = 0.94). Intraoperative blood loss under NOSES interventions was slightly lower than in laparoscopic-assisted surgeries (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes removed and anal function scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). It was revealed that in the NOSES group, the function of the gastrointestinal tract normalized at an earlier time, slightly the time to start liquid food intake and the duration of postoperative hospital stay were reduced (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference between groups was found in complications, such as pneumonia (p = 0.03). The absolute number of complications was observed more often in the LA surgery group (10.4%) than in the NOSES group (5.8%). Local recurrence was less common in the NOSES group (p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in disease progression (p = 0.16). When analyzing disease-free and overall survival rate in this study, there was no statistically significant difference between the two surgical techniques in terms of their effect on postoperative survival (p > 0.05). The results of this study demonstrate that NOSES technique is a relatively safe and effective surgical option in patients with colorectal cancer. It has high surgical efficiency providing no increased risk of surgical intervention, reducing total number of postoperative complications, reducing duration of postoperative hospital stay, reducing the time for gastrointestinal function recovery and the start of food intake. This study supports that NOSES has clear advantages over conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery.

Oncological survival in pancreatic head ductal carcinoma: hybrid minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy - a single centre analysis.

Surgery remains the only curative treatment option for pancreatic head cancer. Laparoscopic surgical techniques are increasingly used, in line with the development of visceral surgery as a whole. The success of surgery is measured by the oncological outcome. Aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcome and survival after laparoscopic assisted resection of the pancreatic head compared to open surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma. Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of 182 laparoscopic pancreatic head resections for ductal carcinoma were compared with 585 open pancreatic head resections. The laparoscopic procedures were performed between 2010 and 2022, the open procedures between 2002 and 2022. Laparoscopic procedure was significantly superior in terms of intraoperative blood loss (575 vs. 600mL, P=0.021) and operative time (413 vs. 427 min, P=0.033). Tumour size (25 vs. 27mm, P=0.028), need for portal vein resection (P=0.009) and blood transfusion (P=0.004) were significantly greater in the open group (P=0.009). The resection margin remained negative significantly more often in the laparoscopic group (159 [87%] vs. 449 [77%], P<0.001). There was no difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Postoperative survival at 5 years was significantly better in the laparoscopic group (37% vs. 15%, P<0.001). In our cohort, patients who underwent hybrid laparoscopic resection of pancreatic head cancer showed a significantly improved oncological outcome. Most of these effects are due to selection bias, which is not captured by the clinical parameters used to date. Our results highlight the need for additional prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer.

Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers.

It is assumed that robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) may facilitate complex pelvic dissection for rectal cancer compared to the laparoscopic-assisted resection(LAR). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity, short- and long-term oncologic, and functional outcomes between the RAS and LAR approaches. Between 2015 and 2021, all rectal cancers operated on by (LAR) or (RAS) were retrospectively reviewed in two colorectal surgery centers. A total of 197 patients were included in the study, with 70% in the LAR group and 30% in the RAS group. The tumor location and stage were identical in both groups (not significant = NS). The overall postoperative mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups. (0% LAR; 0.5% RAS; NS). The postoperative morbidity was similar between the two groups (60% LAR vs 57% RAS; NS). The number of early surgical re-interventions within the first 30days was similar (10% for the LAR group and 3% for the RAS group; NS). The rate of complete TME was similar (88% for the LAR group and 94% for the RAS group; NS). However, the rate of circumferential R1 was significantly higher in the LAR group (13%) compared to the RAS group (2%) (p = 0.009). The 3-year recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups (77% for both groups; NS). After a mean follow-up of three years, the incidence of anterior resection syndrome was significantly lower in the LAR group compared to the RAS group (54 vs 76%; p = 0.030). The use of a RAS was found to be reliable for oncologic outcomes and morbidity. However, the expected benefits for functional outcomes were not observed. Therefore, the added value of RAS for rectal cancer needs to be reassessed in light of new laparoscopic technologies and patient management options.

Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.

Mid-rectal cancer treatment traditionally involves conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection (CLAR). This study aimed to assess the clinical and therapeutic advantages of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) over CLAR. To compare the clinical outcomes, intraoperative metrics, postoperative recovery, complications, and long-term prognosis between NOSES and CLAR groups. A total of 136 patients were analyzed, with 92 undergoing CLAR and 44 undergoing NOSES. Clinical outcomes were evaluated, and propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control potential biases. The NOSES group exhibited significant improvements in postoperative recovery, including lower pain scores on days 1, 3, and 5 (p < .001), reduced need for additional analgesics (p = .02), shorter hospital stays (10.8 ± 2.3 vs. 14.2 ± 5.3 days; p < .001), and decreased intraoperative blood loss (48.1 ± 52.7 mL vs. 71.0 ± 55.0 mL; p = .03). Patients undergoing NOSES also reported enhanced satisfaction with postoperative abdominal appearance and better quality of life. Additionally, the NOSES approach resulted in fewer postoperative complications. While long-term outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence rates) were comparable between the two methods, NOSES demonstrated superior postoperative outcomes compared to CLAR in mid-rectal cancer treatment, while maintaining similar long-term oncological safety. These findings suggest that NOSES could serve as an effective alternative to CLAR without compromising long-term results.

Case Report: Laparoscopy-assisted resection for intra-abdominal gossypiboma masquerading as a jejunal tumor (with video)

IntroductionIntra-abdominal gossypiboma, a cotton-based retained foreign body after an abdominal surgery, is associated with various clinical manifestations and complications. Its infrequent occurrence and unpredictability make its early diagnosis particularly challenging. We herein present an atypical case of intra-abdominal gossypiboma mistaken for a jejunal tumor.Case presentationA 33-year-old female presented to the emergency room with an acute episode of progressive abdominal pain and distention, nausea, and vomiting for 20 hours. She had undergone an urgent cesarean section due to fetal tachycardia seven years prior. The initial diagnosis of small bowel obstruction (SBO) due to a jejunal tumor was established by computed tomography. Subsequent to successful medical management of the SBO, a laparoscopy-assisted resection of the mass and the adherent jejunal segment was conducted, culminating in a primary side-to-side jejunojejunostomy. Examination of the excised tissue revealed an approximately spherical fibrous mass, 6 × 6 × 5 cm in dimension, embedded in the jejunal wall, housing a 20 × 20-cm gauze. Postoperative recovery and routine follow-up ensued without complications.ConclusionIn light of this case, the need for clinicians to maintain an elevated awareness and suspicion of gossypiboma should be accentuated when evaluating an intra-abdominal mass, especially in patients with a prior history of high-risk laparotomy. Laparoscopic surgery stands out as a technically proficient and minimally invasive strategy for diagnosing and treating intra-abdominal gossypiboma. Besides, it is imperative to emphasize the importance of meticulous surgical procedures and postoperative protocols to prevent such oversights, reaffirming the need for consistent intraoperative counts and checks of surgical items.

Parachute-like pull-through anastomosis for low rectal cancer: a new method for preservation of anal function

BackgroundWith recent improvements in surgical technique, oncological outcomes of low rectal cancer have improved over time. But the QoL impairment as a result of anal functional disorder cannot be ignored. And the incidence of anastomosis-related complications cannot be ignored. To address these problems, a personal technique for pull-through coloanal anastomosis (parachute-like intussuscept pull-through anastomosis) was introduced and evaluated. This technique can relatively reduce surgical complications, minimize the impact of anal function, and obviate a colostomy creation.MethodsBetween June 2020 and April 2021, 14 consecutive patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectal cancer in our hospital. Parachute-like pull-through anastomosis method was performed in all patients. Anal function, perioperative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.ResultsThe mean (SD) operative time of first stage was 282.1 min (range 220–370) with an average estimated blood loss of 90.3 mL (range 33–200). And the mean (SD) operative time of second was 46 min (range 25–76) with an average estimated blood loss of 16.1 mL (range 5–50). Wexner scores declined significantly during the median follow-up of 18 months. Four postoperative anastomosis-related complications occurred in 14 patients, including perianastomotic abscess: 1 case (7%), anastomotic stricture: 1 case (7%), and colonic ischemia of the exteriorized colonic segment: 2 cases (14%).ConclusionThe results suggest that the method can facilitate safe and easy completion of coloanal anastomosis, using parachute-like pull-through anastomosis, with acceptable anal function.

Subepithelial tumors: How does endoscopic full-thickness resection & submucosal tunneling with endoscopic resection compare with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery?

Background and study aims Endoscopic techniques are rapidly emerging for resection of subepithelial tumors (SETs). Submucosal tunneling for endoscopic resection (STER), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) are current alternatives to open surgery. In this study, we aimed to compare the three endoscopic techniques. Patients and methods Consecutive patients who underwent resection of a submucosal esophageal or gastric lesion at several tertiary care centers were included in a dedicated registry over 3 years. Demographics, size and location of resected lesion, histology of specimen, length of procedure, adverse events (AEs), duration of hospital stay, and follow-up data were collected. Results Ninety-six patients were included (47.7 % male, mean age 62): STER n = 34, EFTR n = 34, LECS n = 280. The lesions included leiomyoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and other. The mean lesion size was 28 mm (STD 16, range 20-72 mm). The majority of lesions in the EFTR and laparoscopic-assisted resection group were GISTs. There was no significant difference in clear resection margins, post-procedure complication rates, recurrence rate and total follow-up duration between the groups. However, the LECS group had a procedure time at least 30 minutes longer than STER or EFTR ( P < 0.01). Total hospital stay for the laparoscopic-assisted resection group was also longer when compared to STER (1.5) and EFTR (1.8) ( P < 0.01). Conclusions STER, EFTR, and laparoscopic-assisted resection are efficacious approaches for resection of SETs with similar R0 resection rates, complication rates, and AE rates. Laparoscopic assisted resection appears more time-consuming and is associated with a longer hospital stay.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study

BackgroundNatural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been increasingly applied in radical surgery of abdominal and pelvic organs, but it is still in the exploratory stage. There is insufficient evidence to prove its efficacy.MethodsFrom January 2013 to June 2017, a total of 351 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were eventually included in this study. Patients who underwent NOSES were assigned to the NOSES group, while patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic assisted resection were assigned as to the LAP group. Propensity score matching was used to align clinicopathological features between the two groups.ResultsFrom the perioperative data and postoperative follow-up results of both groups, patients in the NOSES group had less intraoperative bleeding (47.0 ± 60.4 ml vs 87.1 ± 101.2 ml, P = 0.011), shorter postoperative gastrointestinal recovery (50.7 ± 27.3 h vs 58.6 ± 28.5 h, P = 0.040), less postoperative analgesic use (36.8% vs 52.8%, P = 0.019), lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.001), lower rate of postoperative complications (5.7% vs 15.5%, P = 0.020), more satisfaction with body image (P = 0.001) and cosmesis (P < 0.001) postoperatively. The NOSES group had a higher quality of life. Moreover, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.ConclusionNOSES could be a safe and reliable technique for radical resection of rectal cancer, with better short-term outcomes than conventional laparoscopy, while long-term survival is not significantly different from that of conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 5 cm: Results of a retrospective, single-center series of 1,802 consecutive patients

BackgroundThe role of laparoscopy-assisted resection for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors >5 cm is still disputed. We aimed to assess the advantages of laparoscopy-assisted resection for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors >5 cm. MethodsIn total, 1,802 patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors who underwent laparoscopy-assisted surgery or open surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce confounders. ResultsIn total, 518 patients with tumor size >5 cm were enrolled in this study (males: 292, 56.4%; females: 226, 43.6%; median age: 58 years, range: 23–85 years). One hundred and twenty-three (23.7%) patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted resection, and 395 (76.3%) patients underwent open resection. After propensity score matching, 190 patients were included (95 in each group). The laparoscopy-assisted surgery group was superior to the open surgery group considering the blood loss (>200 mL: 6.3% vs 22.1%, P = .005), length of midline incision (6.0 ± 0.9 cm vs 9.6 ± 2.1 cm, P < .001), time to first flatus (49.7 ± 10.5 hours vs 63.9 ± 7.4 hours, P < .001), and shorter hospital stay (10.3 ± 3.2 days vs 11.9 ± 2.9 days, P < .001). The difference in relapse-free survival or overall survival between the laparoscopy-assisted surgery and open surgery groups after matching was not significant (all P > .05). On subgroup analysis, the relapse-free survival and overall survival of the laparoscopy-assisted surgery group were comparable to those of the open surgery group, irrespective of tumor location (gastric or nongastric locations) (all P > .05). ConclusionWhen performed by experienced surgeons, laparoscopy-assisted resection is feasible and safe for gastrointestinal stromal tumors >5 cm, which showed improved short-term outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes, regardless of whether the tumor had a gastric or nongastric location.

Multiple intestinal lymphangiomas with episodic hemorrhage requiring partial laparoscopic resection: a case report

BackgroundLymphangioma is a non-epithelial tumor marked by aggregates of abnormally dilated lymphatics. Mesenteric occurrences account for < 1% of all cases, and < 0.05% involve the gastrointestinal tract. Most are confined to children, rarely affecting adults.Case presentationHerein, we describe an elderly Japanese woman with anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and episodic bleeding due to multiple intestinal lymphangiomas. Abdominal computed tomography revealed multiple low-density defects of mesentery, with areas of intermediate (T1 images) or high (T2 images) signal intensity similarly dispersed in magnetic resonance scanning sequences. Single-balloon enteroscopy was undertaken, enabling identification and tattooing of a small intestinal bleeding source. Laparoscopy-assisted resection at this site served to control related hemorrhage, removing a histologically confirmed hemolymphangioma. Having recovered uneventfully, the patient remained stable 2 months postoperatively.ConclusionsAlthough rare in adults, mesenteric or gastrointestinal lymphangiomas must be considered in a setting of anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Complete resection is advantageous to improve patient symptoms, but limited resection of multiple lesions may be equally effective.

Combined laparoscopic lymphoadenectomy of lateral pelvic and inguinal nodal metastases using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging guidance in low rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a case report

BackgroundIntraoperative near-infrared fluorescence (NIR) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) can demonstrate real-time lymphatic drainage and thus improve the accuracy and completeness of lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer surgery. However, it has not been utilized in the inguinal lymphadenectomy in rectal cancer. This study aimed to describe a case of combined laparoscopic lymphadenectomy of left lateral pelvic and inguinal nodal metastases using NIR imaging with ICG imaging guidance for a rectal cancer patient with left lateral pelvic and inguinal lymph node metastases.Case presentationA 26-year-old man presented rectal cancer located 7 cm from the anal verge and enlarged lymph nodes in the left inguinal area. Pretreatment workup revealed rectal cancer with left lateral pelvic and inguinal lymph node metastases. The patient received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT), including radiation (total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) to the whole pelvis and bilateral inguinal regions together with eight cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, and leucovorin) and three cycles of bevacizumab targeted chemotherapy. After pCRT, both colonoscopy and MR scan revealed a significant response of the primary tumor to pCRT, while MR scan revealed enlarged left lateral pelvic and inguinal lymph nodes. After four months from the completion of radiation (2 months after the last course of bevacizumab targeted therapy), the patient underwent laparoscopic-assisted ultra-low anterior resection and lymphadenectomy of left lateral pelvic and inguinal nodal metastases using ICG-NIR fluorescence imaging. The combined procedure was performed successfully without perioperative complication. Total operative time was 480 min and estimated blood loss 50 mL. Totally 34 lymph nodes were retrieved.ConclusionsThis is the first report of the safety and feasibility of ICG-NIR fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy of left lateral pelvic and inguinal nodal metastases in managing low rectal cancer with lateral pelvic and inguinal LNs metastases.

Urinary Tract Endometriosis: A Multidisciplinary Fight Against a Silent Enemy

To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic robotic assisted approach to urinary tract endometriosis. This is an educational video to explain the main steps of robotic assisted ureteroneocystostomy owing to endometriosis. Tertiary care university hospital. A patient written consent was obtained on March 9, 2021. The local institutional review board confirmed that the video met the ethical criteria. Laparoscopic robotic assisted resection of uterosacral ligament endometriotic nodule, left terminal partial ureterectomy, partial cystectomy, and ureteroneocystostomy. This video shows a stepwise approach to laparoscopic robotic assisted urinary tract endometriosis management demonstrating its feasibility and safety. Urinary tract endometriosis affect only the 0.3% to 6% of women affected by endometriosis, among which the most common localization is the bladder (84%-90%) [1]. The ureteral compression is rare but can lead to obstruction up to silent loss of renal function [2], which is one of the main factors to take into account in the management of this disease [3].

Laparoscopy-assisted Resection of Transverse Colon Cancer with an Abdominal Wall Abscess in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis

Laparoscopy-assisted Resection of Transverse Colon Cancer with an Abdominal Wall Abscess in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Hirschsprung Disease Combined with Colorectal Anastomosis with a Stapling Technique in Infants.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection and colorectal anastomosis with a stapling technique in the treatment of Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) in infants. Methods: From June 2018 to January 2019, 25 cases of HSCR diagnosed by clinical examination and pathology were selected at the Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. All children were treated with standard laparoscopic-assisted transanal endorectal pull-through surgery (the modified Swenson technique). The short segment type and the typical type with a descending colon-rectum anastomosis were both included. The long segment type had an ascending colon-rectal anastomosis after ascending colon turnover. The colorectal anastomosis was divided into traditional manual anastomosis and straight intraluminal stapler (SIS) anastomosis. According to the different methods of anastomosis, the patients were divided into a traditional group and a SIS group. Age, gender, body weight, operation time, blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust and defecation time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative short-term complications were analyzed retrospectively. Results: A total of 25 children were diagnosed with HSCR. There were 17 boys and 8 girls, and their average age was 10.20 months (interquartile range, 8.60-11.30). Their average body weight was 7.90 kg (interquartile range, 7.50-8.40). There were 17 cases of the typical type, 5 cases of the short segment type, and 3 cases of the long segment type. The different colorectal anastomosis methods were divided into 10 cases in the traditional group and 15 cases in the SIS group. There were no intraoperative complications, wound infections, or anastomotic fistula. Compared with the SIS group, children in the traditional group had an increased operative time (129.5 versus 103.00 minutes; P < .0001), increased intraoperative blood loss (20.00 versus 7.00 mL; P < .0001), increased postoperative hospitalization time (12.00 versus 9.00 days; P = .0003), and increased postoperative defecation time (18.40 versus 13.20 hours; P < .0001). After 6-12 months of follow-up, there was no anastomotic stenosis or enterocolitis in the SIS group. In the traditional group, 1 child had anastomotic stenosis, which improved 6 months after anal dilatation. One case of enterocolitis occurred 4 months after the operation and was cured after enema and infusion. Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted resection combined with colorectal anastomosis with the stapling technique in the treatment of HSCR in infants is feasible. It had a short operation time, less bleeding, less trauma, and a rapid recovery of postoperative intestinal function. The anastomosis was smooth, wide, and reliable, and anastomotic fistula and stenosis did not occur.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of general anesthesia alone with those of combined epidural/general anesthesia in Chinese patients with gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopy-assisted tumor resection

Purpose: To compare postoperative opioid consumption, inflammatory response, survival/clinical outcomes and safety profile of epidural combined with general anesthesia (GA) versus GA in stage 1 gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention by laparoscopy.Method: Chinese patients with early-stage gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic-assisted tumor resection were enrolled and received either epidural combined with general anesthesia (group EA + GA) or general anesthesia only (group GA) in allocation ratio of 1:1. The following efficacy variables were assessed: 1) Pain score was measured on VAS scale; 2) post-operative consumption; 3) Quality of recovery; 4) inflammatory response; and 5) survival outcome. Safety was assessed throughout the study period.Results: Data for 200 subjects were analyzed. Compared to GA alone, combination of EA + GA demonstrate significantly greater reduction in post-operative pain with decrease postoperative opioid consumption. Also, the combination of GA and EA inhibited inflammatory response when compared to patients who received GA only. Moreover, the combination of GA and EA did not demonstrate any clinical benefit in survival outcome, when compared to patients who received GA alone, indicating that GA + EA has no role in improving survival outcome among patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. Additionally, EA + GA was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, compared to GA.Conclusion: Overall, the results favor the use of GA + EA in Chinese patients with early-stage gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic-assisted tumor resection. GA + EA combination improves immune response by inhibiting the inflammatory response but has no significant effect on survival outcome.

Coil-Localized Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Symptomatic Gastrointestinal Vascular Malformations in Children and Young Adults.

To describe a technique of intentional preoperative coil localization of symptomatic pediatric GI vascular malformations by pediatric interventional radiology to facilitate fluoroscopically assisted laparoscopic resection. We searched the electronic privacy information center and picture archive and communication system in our center and found 3 cases. The electronic privacy information center and picture archive and communication system databases were the sources for retrieval of demographic, medical, radiological, and procedural information in all 3 cases. After many nondiagnostic investigations in all 3 patients, a GI vascular malformation as a cause of GI bleeding was diagnosed with computed tomography angiography/magnetic resonance angiography and catheter angiography. A preoperative 0.018-inch Hilal coil was placed as close as possible to the vascular malformation during super selective angiography. Laparoscopic surgery was performed within 24 hours of coil placement. In all cases, histology confirmed the resected bowel lesions to be vascular malformations. Intentional endovascular coil localization has the potential to increase the precision of lesion localization and may reduce laparoscopic operative time, when guided by the coil position.

Case report laparoscopy-assisted pre-pubic urethrostomy as a palliative procedure for resection of distal urethral tumor in a female dog

BackgroundThis paper presents the first described case of laparoscopy-assisted prepubic urethrostomy and laparoscopic resection of a tumor of the distal part of the urethra in a female dog as a palliative treatment.Case presentationAn intact, 11 -year-old, mixed breed female dog,weighing 15 kg, was admitted with signs of urinary obstruction and difficultywith catheterization. Vaginal, rectal, and endoscopic examinations revealed a firmmass in the pelvic cavity at the level of the pelvic urethra. Ultrasound andcomputed tomography examination showed enlargement of the urethral wall (5.5 cmwidth and 3 cm thick), which was significantly restricting the patency of theurethra. The lesion affected only the distal part of the urethra without thepresence of local or distant metastatic changes.The affected portion of the urethra was laparoscopically removed while performing pre-pubic urethrostomy with laparoscopy. The patient regained full consciousness immediately after the end of anesthesia, without signs of urinary incontinence. Histopathological examination of the removed urethra revealed an oncological margin only from the side of the bladder. In the period of 2.5 months after the procedure, the owner did not notice any symptoms that could indicate a postoperative recurrence, which was diagnosed three months after the procedure.ConclusionsPre-pubic urethrostomy can be successfully performed with the assistance of laparoscopy. The use of minimally invasive surgery will allow, in selected cases, removal of the urethral tumor, and in inoperable cases, to perform a minimally invasive palliative pre-pubic urethrostomy.

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.

Whether natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) could provide beneficial effects in treating elderly patients is still under debate. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of transanal NOSES with conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection (LA) in elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A retrospective analysis from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Outcomes related to surgery, body image, quality of life, anal function and long-term survival were compared between the two groups with the propensity-score matching (PSM) method. After PSM, 78 patients were successfully compared. Patients with NOSES had faster gastrointestinal function recovery (P = 0.028), less postoperative complications (P = 0.025), lower pain scores on days 1, 3 and 5 after surgery (P < 0.001). The body image score (P < 0.001) and cosmetic score (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the NOSES group than the LA group at 1month after surgery. Patients with NOSES posed better global health status (P < 0.001), role function (P = 0.009), emotional function (P = 0.011) and social function (P = 0.011) at 3months after surgery. Moreover, NOSES showed non inferiority in anal function 6months after surgery. No significant difference could be found regarding to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM). In elderly CRC patients, NOSES harbored favorable postoperative outcomes, excellent cosmetic properties and better quality of life. Besides, anal function and long-term outcomes of NOSES can be sure for elderly patients.

Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is an intra-abdominal procedure that does not require an auxiliary incision to take a surgical sample from the abdominal wall through the natural orifice, but there are few systematic clinical studies on it. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of NOSES. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and follow-up of 165 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent NOSES or conventional laparoscopic surgery at our center from January 2013 to June 2015. From the perioperative data and postoperative follow-up results of both groups, patients in the NOSES group had less intraoperative bleeding (49.3 ± 55.8 ml vs. 75.1 ± 57.3 ml, p = 0.02), shorter postoperative gastrointestinal recovery (42.3 ± 15.5 h vs. 50.1 ± 17.0 h, p = 0.01), less postoperative analgesic use (35.6% vs. 57.6%, p = 0.02), lower postoperative pain scores, lower rate of postoperative complications (6.8% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.01), better satisfaction of the image and cosmesis of the abdominal wall postoperatively, and higher quality of life. Moreover, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between two groups. Overall, NOSES is a safe and reliable minimally invasive surgical technique for patients with low rectal cancer.

Long-Term Outcome Comparison Between Two Specimen Extraction Approaches for Middle Rectum Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Objective. There are few studies comparing the long-term results of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection (LA) in the treatment of middle rectal cancer. This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the reliability of NOSES. Method. From January 2013 to December 2017, all patients diagnosed with median rectal cancer in our hospital who underwent NOSES and LA were enrolled. We used propensity-score matching (PSM) to balance baseline data between the NOSES group and the laparoscopic group. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate OS and DFS. Student's t-test was used to analyze the difference of continuous data. Categorical data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher's exact test. Results. After PSM, 38 patients were included in each group. We found that surgical bleeding volume in the NOSES group was considerably lower than that in the LA group (49.5 ± 47.5mL vs. 86.3 ± 83.5mL, P = .01). From the short-term results, the first flatus and regular diet time in the NOSES group were shorter than those in the LA group (41.3 ± 25.2 vs. 54.0 ± 19.2hours, P < .01 and 63.9 ± 42.6hours vs. 105.1 ± 66.8hours, P < .01, respectively). Long-term OS and DFS were not different between the groups. Conclusion. Therefore, NOSES is a reliable technique for middle rectal cancer treatment. Short-term outcomes are pointedly better than LA, while the two surgical approaches did not differ in the long-term outcomes or complication rate.