Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy In Patients Research Articles

A modified method for Billroth-II gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

BackgroundThere are many types of gastrojejunostomy reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer, each of which has merits and demerits. This study introduced a novel method (called pant-shaped anastomosis) involving the construction of a side-to-side anastomosis between the afferent loop and efferent loop at the site of gastrojejunal anastomosis using a linear stapler. The results of applying pant-shaped anastomosis to LADG were also analyzed.MethodsThe clinical data of 96 patients who underwent LADG with pant-shaped anastomosis between June 2018 and June 2020 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Wuhu City, China) were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsAll procedures were successfully completed without conversion to open laparotomy. An average pant-shaped anastomosis took 22 min to construct and had a mean incision length of 5.3 cm. The mean time to postoperative first flatus was 3.5 days. The mean time to intake of an oral semiliquid diet was 5.5 days. The average postoperative hospital stay was 8.2 days. No patient developed extraluminal bleeding, intraluminal bleeding, anastomosis leakage, afferent obstruction, internal herniation or pancreatitis. The proportion of patients who experienced significant reflux was 10.1% (Visick III–IV). In total, 62.6% of patients exhibited endoscopic reflux gastritis of grade 1 or less.ConclusionsPant-shaped anastomosis is a safe and simple procedure. It is a feasible option to reduce afferent obstruction after LADG in patients with distal gastric cancer.

Morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer after laparoscopy-assisted or open distal gastrectomy: a randomized-controlled trial.

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LDG) combined with D2 lymphadenectomy may be safely performed in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) by experienced surgeons at specialized high-volume institutions as shown in the Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS)-01. However, studies focusing on the use of LDG in patients with gastric cancer older than 65 years are rare. This study was designed to investigate the morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted or open distal gastrectomy (ODG). In this prospective, randomized, open, parallel controlled trial, patients older than 65 years with tumor located at the middle or lower part of the stomach will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomly divided into a laparoscopic group and an open surgery group. The early post-operative complications, intra-operative complications and post-operative recovery will be compared between the two groups. This trial will provide valuable clinical evidence for the objective assessment of the feasibility, short-term safety, and potential benefits of LDG compared with ODG for gastric cancer in the elderly patients. This trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. (Identifier: NCT02246153.) in September 22, 2014.

Impact of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer has been rapidly adopted for the treatment of both early and advanced gastric cancers which need lymph node dissection, but remains difficult procedure, especially in patients with obesity. We evaluated the impact of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes of LADG for gastric cancer. We retrospectively investigated 243 patients who underwent LADG for gastric cancer between January 2007 and December 2014. The patients were classified based on their body mass index (BMI) into the Obese (BMI≥25) and Non-Obese (BMI<25) Groups. Patient characteristics, clinicopathologic and operative findings, and short- and long-term outcomes were investigated and compared between the groups. The groups did not differ in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, the presence of comorbidities, or pathologic stage. Operative time (265±46.6 vs. 244±55.6min; P=0.007) and estimated blood loss (113±101.4 vs. 66.5±95.2ml; P=0.007) were greater in the Obese Group. Fewer lymph nodes were retrieved in the Obese Group (38±23.7 vs. 47.5±24.3; P=0.004). No differences were evident in postoperative complication rate (20% vs. 17%; P=0.688) or the duration of postoperative hospital stay (9±8.5 vs. 9±5.1days; P=0.283) between the two groups. In the Obese Group, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower than in the Non-Obese Group (67.6% vs. 90.3%; P=0.036). Furthermore, 5-year disease-specific survival was significantly lower in the Obese Group than in the Non-Obese Group (72.7% vs. 94.9%; P=0.015). LADG in patients with obesity could be performed as safe as in patients without obesity, with comparable postoperative results. But obesity may be a poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Safety of Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Patients Aged 75 Years or More

Safety of Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Patients Aged 75 Years or More

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer poses few limitations for selected elderly patients: a single-center experience.

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for early gastric cancer have been demonstrated in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of LADG in patients ≥80 years of age with early gastric cancer, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of 1–2, and a performance status (PS) of 0–1.Case presentationFrom April 2009 to July 2011, 12 elderly patients aged ≥80 years and 43 younger patients underwent LADG for early gastric cancer. Seven of the 55 patients underwent LADG and simultaneous surgery including surgery for colorectal cancer, cholecystectomy, or other conditions. Forty-eight of the 55 patients who underwent only LADG were studied. Demographics and postoperative outcomes were compared.ResultsThe postoperative complication rate, time to first ambulation, time to first flatus, time to first fluid intake, and postoperative hospital stay were similar in these two groups. Nutritional status as assessed by body weight, serum albumin, and total protein at 1 and 3 months after surgery was also similar in these two groups.ConclusionsPostoperative outcomes were acceptable in the elderly patients included in the study. LADG for early gastric cancer is a safe and effective treatment in elderly patients aged ≥80 years with an ASA status of 1–2 and PS of 0–1.

Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: Results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01).

4 Background: Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is widely performed for gastric cancer in Eastern countries, although large scale prospective data are still lacking. We conducted a phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01) to compare the short and long term outcomes of LADG versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer in Korea. Methods: The primary end point was 5-year overall survival. The morbidity within 30 postoperative days and the surgical mortality were compared to evaluate the safety of LADG as a secondary end point. A total of 1,416 patients were randomly assigned to the LADG group (n = 705) or the ODG group (n = 711) between Feb 1, 2006 and Aug 31, 2010. Results: 1,256 were eligible for per protocol (PP) analysis (644 and 612, respectively). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the LADG group (LADG vs. ODG; 13.0% vs. 19.9%, P =.001). In detail, the wound complication rate of the LADG group was significantly lower than that of the ODG group (3.1% vs. 7.7%, P &lt;.001). The major intra-abdominal complication (7.6% vs. 10.3%, P =.095) and mortality rates (0.6% vs. 0.3%, P =.450) were similar between groups. Modified intention-to-treat analysis showed similar results with PP analysis. Conclusions: LADG for patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer is safe and has a benefit of lower occurrence of wound complication compared with conventional ODG. Clinical trial information: NCT00452751.

Laparoscopy-Assisted Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) to determine whether LADG is an acceptable alternative to open distal gastrectomy (ODG). LADG combined with less than D2 or D2 lymphadenectomy for EGC is still a controversial surgical intervention for its uncertain oncological safety and economic benefit. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis that included randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of LADG versus ODG to evaluate whether the safety and efficacy of LADG in patients with EGC are equivalent to those of ODG. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database was performed. Eligible trials published between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2010, were included in the study. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were carried out by RevMan 5.0 software. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADEpro 3.2.2. Twenty-two studies with 3411 participants were included in this study. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved in LADG was close to that retrieved in ODG (in the less than D2 resection: weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -5.78 to 2.19; P = 0.38; heterogeneity: P < 0.00001, I = 98%; and in the D2 resection: WMD = -1.53; 95% CI, -3.56 to 0.51; P = 0.14; heterogeneity: P = 0.23, I = 26%). The overall postoperative morbidity was significantly less in LADG than in ODG (relative risk = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74; P < 0.00001; heterogeneity: P = 0.94, I = 0%). LADG reduced the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative analgesic consumption, and hospital duration, without increasing the total hospitalization costs and cancer recurrence rate. The long-term survival rate of patients undergoing LADG was similar to that of patients undergoing ODG. However, LADG was still a technically dependent and time-consuming procedure. Conversion rate of LADG was 0% to 2.94%. The reported reasons for conversion were bleeding, adhesion, and safety resection margin requirement. : There were potential biases and significant heterogeneity in some clinical outcome measures in this study. Methodologically high-quality controlled clinical trials were sparse for this new surgical intervention. According to The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, when assessing the safety and efficacy of LADG by comparing with those of ODG with the defined clinical outcomes in patients with EGC, the quality of the currently available clinical evidence was very low. LADG may be a technically feasible alternative for EGC when it is performed in experienced surgical centers in which patients undergoing LADG may benefit from the faster postoperative recovery. However, the currently available evidence cannot exclude the potential clinical benefits or harms, especially in the node-positive cases. Methodologically high-quality comparative studies are needed for further evaluation.

Comparative Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open Subtotal Gastrectomy for pT2 Gastric Cancer

PurposeLaparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is a widely accepted surgery for early gastric cancer. However, its use in advanced gastric cancer has rarely been studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and survival outcomes of LADG for pT2 gastric cancer.Materials and MethodsBetween January 2004 and December 2009, we evaluated 67 and 52 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and LADG, respectively, with diagnosis of pT2 gastric cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and survival were retrospectively compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were statistically significant differences in the proximal margin of the clinicopathological parameters. The operation time was significantly longer in LADG than in ODG (207.7 vs. 159.9 minutes). There were 6 (9.0%) and 5 (9.6%) complications in ODG and LADG, respectively. During follow-up periods, tumor recurrence occurred in 7 (10.4%) patients of the ODG and in 4 (7.7%) patients of the LADG group. The 5-year survival rate of ODG and LADG was 88.6% and 91.3% (p=0.613), respectively. In view of lymph node involvement, 5-year survival rates were 96.0% in ODG versus 97.0% in LADG for patients with negative nodal metastasis (p=0.968) and 80.9% in ODG versus 78.7% in LADG for those with positive nodal metastasis (p=0.868).ConclusionAlthough prospective study is necessary to compare LADG with open gastrectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy might be considered as an alternative treatment for some pT2 gastric cancer.

Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

With the application of laparoscopy, laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of patients with early gastric cancer has been performed, but the safety and effectiveness of this method need to be explored. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open distal gastrectomy for patients with early gastric cancer. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) identified all the randomized clinical trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for patients with early gastric cancer published in the last 10 years. Quality assessment was done on each trial and relevant data were extracted from qualified trials. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.2.2 software (Cochrane). Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 218 patients were included. Comparing laparoscopic resection with open resection, results showed less estimated blood loss (WMD (weighted mean difference): -121.86; 95% CI (confidence interval): -145.61, -98.11; P < 0.001), earlier postoperative first flatus (WMD: -0.95; 95% CI: -1.09, -0.81; P < 0.001), and shorter durations of hospital stays (WMD: -2.27; 95%CI: -3.47, -1.06; P = 0.0002), but longer surgery times (WMD: 58.71; 95% CI: 52.69, 64.74; P < 0.001) and fewer lymph nodes dissected (WMD: -3.64; 95% CI: -5.80,-1.47; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative complications (OR (odds ratio): 0.57; 95% CI: 0.31,1.03; P = 0.06). The short-term outcome of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for patients with early gastric cancer is superior to the open procedure, but its long-term outcome should be proven by further outcomes of RCTs.

The impact of obesity on LADG for early gastric cancer

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has become a viable alternative treatment for patients suffering with early gastric cancer. Surgeons have long thought that obesity might increase the rate of intraoperative or postoperative complications. We set out to clarify the effect that obesity has on performing LADG for the treatment of early gastric cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients who had undergone LADG for early gastric cancer between May 1998 and March 2004. We measured the degree of obesity by using the body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)), and we compared the surgical outcomes between the normal BMI group (BMI < 23 kg/m(2)) and the high BMI group (BMI > or = 23 kg/m(2)). We further subdivided the patients into four groups: normal BMI males and normal BMI females, and high BMI males and high BMI females, and we analyzed them in terms of operation times, numbers of retrieved lymph nodes, and rates of postoperative complications. There were no significant differences between the normal and high BMI groups in terms of the patients' characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative courses, postoperative complications, and operation times. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of retrieved lymph nodes or in the rate of postoperative complications among the four groups (P = 0.5030 and P = 0.3489, respectively). However, there was a statistically significant difference in operation times among the four groups (P = 0.004). Specifically, the males in the high BMI group required a longer operation time than did the females with a normal BMI (P = 0.006) and the females with a high BMI (P = 0.019). For LADG in patients with early gastric cancer, obesity may affect the operation time, and men with high BMI require a longer operation time than do women with normal or high BMI.

Learning Curve of a Laparoscopy Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for a Surgeon Expert in Performing a Conventional Open Gastrectomy

Purpose: The laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy has been increasingly reported as the treatment of choice for early gastric cancer. However, expert surgeons, who have performed a conventional open gastrectomy for a long time, tend to have a negative attitude toward laparoscopic procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the learning curve of a laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for a surgeon expert in performing an open gastrectomy and to analyze the factors that have an effect on a LADG. Materials and Methods: Between April 2005 and March 2006, 62 patients underwent a LADG with D1+beta lymph-node dissection. The 62 patients were divided into 10 sequential groups with 6 cases in each group (the last group was 8 cases), and the time required to reach the plateau of the learning curve was determined by examining the average operative times of these 10 groups. Other factors, such as sex, BMI, complications, transfusion requirements, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, and change of postoperative hemoglobin level, were also analyzed. Results: With the group (after 30 cases), the operative time reached a plateau (average: 170 min/operation). The differences between before the case and after the case with respect to changes in the postoperative hemoglobin level, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, the transfusion requirements, and the complications rate were not significant. Conclusion: According to an analysis of the operative time, experience with 30 LADGs in patients with early gastric cancer is the point at which the plateau of the learning curve (7 months) is reached. Abundant experience with a conventional open gastrectomy and a well-organized laparoscopic surgery team are important factors in overcoming the learning curie earlier.