Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication Research Articles

Laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Randomized prospective study

Laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Randomized prospective study

Corrigendum to ‘‘Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication utilizing the remnant stomach for treatment of GERD after Roux-en Y gastric bypass: How I do It’’

Corrigendum to ‘‘Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication utilizing the remnant stomach for treatment of GERD after Roux-en Y gastric bypass: How I do It’’

Lap. Nissen fundoplication leads to better respiratory symptom control than Toupet in the long term of 20 years

IntroductionHaving performed anti-reflux surgery for thirty years, it was important to reexamine our patients in the long term to enlarge the body of evidence concerning classical and extraesophageal symptoms that are differently controlled by Nissen or Toupet fundoplication.ObjectivesWe report a cohort of 155 GERD patients who underwent fundoplication within a tailored approach between 1994 and 2000. Changes in the perioperative functional outcome, GERD symptoms, and quality of life are being analyzed 10 and 20 years after the operation.ResultsThe operation resulted in a superior quality of life compared to a patient cohort treated with PPI therapy. We found that both surgical methods (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication) cure classical symptoms equally (heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia). GERD patients receiving a Toupet fundoplication seem more likely to suffer from extraesophageal GERD symptoms 10 and 20 years after surgery than patients with a Nissen fundoplication. On the other hand, some patients with Nissen fundoplication report dysphagia even 10 and 20 years after surgery.ConclusionBoth the laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications provide excellent symptom control in the long term. Moreover, the Nissen fundoplication seems to be superior in controlling extraesophageal reflux symptoms, but at the expense of dysphagia. In summary, tailoring the operation based on symptoms seems advantageous.

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication: a safe and effective anti-reflux option in lung transplant recipients.

Fundoplication is known to improve allograft outcomes in lung transplant recipients by reducing retrograde aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease, a modifiable risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has historically been the anti-reflux procedure of choice, but the procedure is associated with discernable rates of postoperative dysphagia and gas-bloat syndrome. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication, an alternate anti-reflux surgery with lower rates of foregut complications in the general population, is the procedure of choice on our institution's lung transplant protocol. In this work, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication in our lung transplant recipients. A prospective case series of 44 lung transplant recipients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication by a single surgeon between September 2018 and November 2020 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative results from 24-h pH, esophageal manometry, gastric emptying, and pulmonary function studies were collected alongside severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Median DeMeester score decreased from 25.9 to 5.4 after fundoplication (p < 0.0001), while percentage of time pH < 4 decreased from 7 to 1.1% (p < 0.0001). The severity of heartburn and regurgitation were also reduced (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0029 respectively). Overall, pulmonary function, esophageal motility, gastric emptying, severity of bloating, and dysphagia were not significantly different post-fundoplication than pre-fundoplication. Patients with decreasing rates of FEV1 pre-fundoplication saw improvement in their rate of change of FEV1 post-fundoplication (p = 0.011). Median follow-up was 32.2months post-fundoplication. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication provides objective pathologic acid reflux control and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux improvement in lung transplant recipients while preserving lung function and foregut motility. Thus, laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is a safe and effective antireflux surgery alternative in lung transplant recipients.

Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication Utilizing the Remnant Stomach for Treatment of GERD After Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass: How I Do It

Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an alternative to fundoplication in patients with concurrent obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, up to 25% of bypassed patients continue to have GERD. When medical management in this population fails, laparoscopic fundoplasty using the remnant stomach is a viable option. This video describes our approach to this procedure.

Nissen Versus Toupet Fundoplication For Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease, Short And Long-term Outcomes. A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains one of the most commonly encountered gastrointestinal disorders. Proton pump inhibitors still show an inadequate effect on about 10% to 40% of the patients. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is the surgical alternative for managing GERD in patients who are not responding to proton pump inhibitors. This study objected at comparing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) concerning the short-term and long-term outcomes. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated the studies comparing between Nissen fundoplication and LTF for the treatment of GERD. Studies were obtained by searching on the EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed central database. The LTF group showed significantly longer operation time, less postoperative dysphagia and gas bloating, less pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter, and higher Demeester scores. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in the perioperative complications, the recurrence of GERD, the reoperation rate, the quality of life, or the reoperation rate. LTF is favored for the surgical treatment of GERD being of lower postoperative dysphagia and gas bloating rates. These benefits were not at the expense of significantly additional perioperative complications or surgery failure.

Laparoscopic Nissen Versus Toupet Fundoplication for Short- and Long-Term Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the most common standard technique worldwidely for Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Another type of fundoplication, laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF), intends to reduce incidence of postoperative complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis are required on short- and long-term outcomes based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between LNF and LTF. We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Knowledge for RCTs comparing LNF and LTF. Outcomes included postoperative reflux recurrence, postoperative heartburn, dysphagia and postoperative chest pain, inability to belch, gas bloating, satisfaction with intervention, postoperative esophagitis, postoperative DeMeester scores, operating time (min), in-hospital complications, postoperative use of proton pump inhibitors, reoperation rate, postoperative lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure (mmHg). We assessed data using risk ratios and weighted mean differences in meta-analyses. Eight eligible RCTs comparing LNF (n = 605) and LTF (n = 607) were identified. There were no significant differences between the LNF and LTF in terms of postoperative reflux recurrence, postoperative heartburn, postoperative chest pain, satisfaction with intervention, reoperation rate in short and long term, in-hospital complications, esophagitis in short term, and gas bloating, postoperative DeMeester scores, postoperative use of proton pump inhibitors, reoperation rate in long term. LTF had lower LOS pressure (mmHg), fewer postoperative dysphagia and inability to belch in short and long term and gas bloating in short term compared to LNF. LTF were equally effective at controlling reflux symptoms and improving the quality of life, but with lower rate of complications compared to LNF. We concluded that LTF surgical treatment was superior for over 16 years old patients with typical symptoms of GERD and without upper abdominal surgical history upon high-level evidence of evidence-based medicine.

Efficacy of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication compared to endoscopic and surgical procedures for GERD treatment: a randomized trials network meta-analysis.

We aim to review and quantitatively compare laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF), Nissen fundoplication (LNF), anterior partial fundoplication (APF), magnetic augmentation sphincter (MSA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and placebo for the treatment of GERD. A number of meta-analyses compared the efficacy of surgical and endoscopic procedures for recalcitrant GERD, but considerable debate on the effectiveness of operative strategies remains. A systematic review of MEDLINE databases, EMBASE, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the aforementioned surgical and endoscopic GERD treatments was performed. Risk ratio and weighted mean difference were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to assess relative inference. Thirty-three RCTs were included. Surgical and endoscopic treatments have similar RR for heartburn, regurgitation, bloating. LTF has a lower RR of post-operative dysphagia when compared to APF (RR 3.3; Crl 1.4-7.1) and LNF (RR 2.5; Crl 1.3-4.4). The pooled network meta-analysis did not observe any significant improvement regarding LES pressure and pH < from baseline. LTF, APF, LNF, MSA, RFA, and TIF had have a similar post-operative PPI discontinuation rate. LTF has a lower rate of post-operative dysphagia when compared to APF and LNF. The pre-post effects, such as GERD-HQRL, LES pressure, and pH <4, should be avoided in meta-analyses because results may be biased. Last, a consensus about the evaluation of GERD treatments' efficacy and their outcomes is needed.

Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication for Lung Transplant Recipients: Outcomes and Effects on Symptoms

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplant (LTx) recipients often experience GERD, which predisposes them to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and obstructive chronic lung allograft dysfunction, ultimately resulting in early rejection and death. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) has historically been the procedure of choice for LTx-related GERD. However, LNF is associated with high rate of postoperative dysphagia and bloating in the general population. Hence, we evaluate laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) as an option for antireflux surgery in LTx recipients, investigating the effects of LTF on DeMeester score, gastric emptying, esophageal manometry, and patient symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective review of LTx patients who underwent LTF at a single center by 1 surgeon (n = 59) between September 2018 and November 2020 was performed, excluding a patient who had a revision of their fundoplication. Preoperative and postoperative esophageal manometry, gastric emptying studies, and patient-reported GERD symptoms were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9 Version 9.3.1 for macOS, GraphPad Software. RESULTS: After LTF, DeMeester score and relative risk of abnormal esophageal function and gastroparesis were significantly decreased, with most patients having lower gastroparesis severity score. Reports of heartburn, regurgitation, and bloating were also reduced. However, the rates of dysphagia were similar. There was no decline in pulmonary function. CONCLUSION: LTF, in addition to providing antireflux control in LTx recipients, has low rate of complication and trends with overall improvement of gastrointestinal issues. LTF ultimately has the potential to be the antireflux operation of choice in LTx recipients, protecting against early rejection and death.

P-031 AN UNUSUAL CASE OF AN INCARCERATED 5MM PORT SITE HERNIA FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION

Abstract Aim Port site hernias are a rare, but recognised risk of laparoscopic surgery. Literature supports fascial closure at port sites of 10mm or greater. However, there are few reported cases of herniation through 5mm port sites. Methods This case report focuses on a 67-year-old female who underwent an uncomplicated primary laparoscopic Toupet's fundoplication. 11 days post procedure she presented with an incarcerated port site hernia. CT scan demonstrated high grade small bowel obstruction with a transition point at the site of the 5mm right sided port. A laparotomy was performed, the hernia reduced, small bowel was viable, and the port site hernia was closed internally using vicryl sutures. Results The incidence of 5mm trocar-site hernias is rare. A recent literature review found only 10 such cases related to general surgery (cholecystectomy:6; appendicectomy: 2; right hemicolectomy: 1; paraesophageal hernia:1). Risk factors for port-site hernias include: high BMI, midline position, size, number and type of trocar tip. The limited current literature identifies excessive trocar manipulation as the major risk factor for developing 5mm port-site hernias, yet routine fascial closure is not supported. Conclusion Herniation at 5mm port sites is rare but attention should be paid when patients present with symptoms suggesting its occurrence.

Comparison of Early Outcomes of Laparoscopic Floppy Nissen Fundoplication and Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication in the Treatment of Type III and IV Hiatal Hernia

Objective: This study aims to compare the laparoscopic Floppy Nissen fundoplication technique (LFNFT) and the laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication technique (LTFT) used in treating Type III and IV hiatal hernias (HHs).&#x0D; Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted after ethical approval. Patients who underwent Type III and IV hiatal hernia surgery were searched between January 2020 and May 2022. Patients who underwent LFNFT and LTFT for hiatal hernia repair were selected. Patients under 18 and patients who were followed up in our clinic after surgery were excluded from the study. The clinical and follow-up differences between the groups were evaluated statistically.&#x0D; Results: Of the 38 patients who met the study criteria, 27 (71.1%) were female. The mean age of all patients was 41.39±14.03 years (21-77). 10 (26.3%) patients had Type 3 HH, and the remaining patients (73.7%) had Type 4 HH. LFNFT was performed on 27 (71.1%) patients, and LTFT on 11 (28.9%). Complications developed in 14 (36.8%) patients in the postoperative follow-up, and the most common difficulty was gas bloating, with a rate of 13.1%. In comparing the groups, LTFT was preferred in the male patients (p=0.005) and younger patients (p

Paraesophageal hernia repair with laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication: impact on pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms and quality of life.

Paraesophageal hiatal hernia (PEH) is characterized by protrusion of intra-abdominal organs into the posterior mediastinum. Respiratory symptoms and reduced pulmonary function have been described as possibly related to lung compression. To assess the effect of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) for PEH repair on pulmonary function, measured with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and respiratory symptoms. Retrospective, single-center, cohort study (November 2015-2020). All patients that completed pre- and postoperative (12months) PFTs assessment were included. The gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), reflux symptom index (RSI) and short form-36 (SF-36) were used. Overall, 71 patients were included. The median age was 67.1years and the majority were females (78.8%). Baseline PFTs were within normal limits in 91% of patients. At 12month follow-up, total lung capacity (TLC) (4.77 vs. 5.07 L; p = 0.0251), vital capacity (VC) (2.97 vs. 3.31 L; p = 0.0065), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (2.07 vs. 2.44 L; p < 0.001) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (2.78 vs. 3.19 L; p < 0.001) were significantly improved. No significant differences were found for diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (17.09 vs. 17.24; p = 0.734), and FEV1/FVC (0.77 vs. 0.77; p = 0.967). Interestingly, improvements were more pronounced in patients with large PEH (type IIIb and IV). At 12month follow-up, both gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms were significantly improved and 94% of patients were satisfied with the operation. The GERD-HRQL (18.1 ± 7.9 vs. 4.01 ± 2.4; p = 0.001), RSI (37.8 ± 9.7 vs. 10.6 ± 8.9; p < 0.001) and all SF-36 items were improved. LTF for the treatment of PEH is safe and seems to be effective up to 12month follow-up with improved lung volumes, spirometry values, quality of life, gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms.

Role of Laparoscopic Fundoplication in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease- A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disease affecting 3-7% of Asians and becoming a major health care burden in elderly population. Surgical intervention with laparoscopic fundoplication is the effective tool in the management of GERD. Aim: To evaluate the role and advantages of laparoscopic fundoplication in the management of cases with GERD and to compare the laparoscopic Nissen’s fundoplication and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication in management of GERD. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective and prospective study was conducted in the Department of General surgery at Government Medical College, Nizamabad from August 2019 to July 2021. A total of 36 cases of both sexes, clinically diagnosed as chronic GERD undergone laparoscopic Nissen’s fundoplication and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication surgery were recruited. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of disease status was done at the end of third month and sixth month. Collected data was analysed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The chi- square test was used to test the significance of qualitative data. The p&lt;0.005 was considered as statistically significant. Results: In total data collected for 36 cases, majority cases were between 31-40 years (n=13) and 41-50 years (n=11). Total of 19 patients had undergone Laparoscopic Nissen's Fundoplication while 17 patients were of Laparoscopic Toupet's Fundoplication surgery. The mean difference of age was statistically not significant (p&gt;0.05). Postsurgical significant improvement was observed in cases of grade 3 (n=7), grade 4 (n=19) and grade 5 (n=10) oesophagitis. The mean duration to start oral liquids was 1.29 days and 1.08 days, mean duration of surgery was 3.62 hours and 3.19 hours, mean duration of hospital stay was 4.12 and 3.67 days and the average ambulatory period was 1.46 and 1.62 days in laparoscopic nissen’s group and laparoscopic toupet’s group, respectively. Conclusion: The laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication were comparable in the management of postoperative Complications. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was comparatively more in laparoscopic Nissen’s group than laparoscopic toupet’s group. However, the incidence was diminished within six months of postoperative follow-up.

653 LAPAROSCOPIC TOUPET FUNDOPLICATION RARELY INFLUENCES THE DECLINE IN FEV1 SEEN AFTER LUNG TRANSPLANT

Abstract Lung allografts have the shortest survival of any solid organ transplant. The leading cause of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). The aetiology of BOS remains poorly understood, with infections, immunosuppression and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) amongst the proposed co-factors. A recent systematic review of GORD and BOS examined six retrospective case series with relatively small numbers and conflicting results. Our dataset is the largest cohort reported to date. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database containing 149 consecutive lung transplant recipients undergoing laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. A single expert surgeon (&amp;gt;5000 procedures) with published high-quality long-term outcomes in the non-transplant population did the operations. All were referred with symptoms of GORD and/or positive 24-hour ambulatory pH study. FEV1 was measured at three time points before (6, 3 and 1 month) and after (3, 6 and 12 months) surgery. Data were analysed using random intercept generalised linear (mixed) models to examine changes in FEV1 across time, as well as graphical methods (least squares method for FEV1 trendlines and two-tailed t-test). Results Median age was 56 (IQR 44–66) years; 84/149 were male. 132 had bilateral sequential single lung transplantation. The underlying pathologies were representative—emphysema, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease. 8 patients died within 6 months of fundoplication. Using a linear mixed model there was no significant change in FEV1 across time after surgery compared with the last pre-operative measurement (p = 0.48). A significant reduction in FEV1 was seen in those undergoing fundoplication after CLAD was diagnosed (1.47 L, 95% CI 1.21–1.72, p &amp;lt; 0.001). There was no change in trajectory of FEV1 when trendlines for each patient were analysed (p = 0.777). Conclusion As with any solid organ transplant, lung allografts unfortunately suffer failure with time. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication performed in a high-volume centre by an experienced surgeon did not appear to alter this. In particular, once CLAD is diagnosed it seems that the decline in function (FEV1) is accelerated and cannot be salvaged by fundoplication. A minority of patients had their declining FEV1 stabilised or improved by surgery, but it is not yet possible to predict response.

633 CONVERSION TO TOUPET FUNDOPLICATION WITH DISTAL GASTRECTOMY AND ROUX-EN-Y GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY AFTER FAILED NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION

Abstract Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication fails in almost 15% of patients and most of them must be re-operated in order to improve reflux symptoms, esophagitis, or hiatal hernia. Surgical options are to redo LNF, distal gastrectomy alone or combination of both procedures. Redoing LNF, is associated with high rate of postoperative complications and re-failure. Purpose To present the early and medium-term postoperative outcomes of patients submitted to Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication combined with Distal Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. Methods prospective study including 23 patients submitted to Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication who presented recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux after the operation. They were studied with endoscopy, barium swallow, manometry and 24 h pH monitoring in order to determine presence of esophagitis, anatomical deformities, defective Lower Esophageal Sphincter and pathologic acid reflux. Surgical process consisted on re-establishing the anatomy of the esophago-gastric junction, and then perform laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication combined with distal gastrecvtomy and Roux Y gastrojejunostomy. Results After surgery statistically significant improvement regarding heartburn (p &amp;lt; 0.0001), dysphagia (p &amp;lt; 0.0001) and retrosternal chest pain (p &amp;lt; 0.0001) as well as in the endoscopic esophagitis was observed. No significant LES pressure increase after the operation was observed. (from 7.88 + 2.7 to 10.5 + 3.36) (p = 0.15), but the abnormal acid reflux improved significantly after the reoperation, %time pH &amp;lt; 4 decreases from 12.00 + 6.62 to 4.3 + 4.04 (0.0004) and DeMeester score from 44.82 + 21.8 to 11.95 + 5.14 (0.0008) respectively. Conclusion The proposed procedure is safe option to treat successfully patients after failed Nissen fundoplication. Reflux symptoms, esophagitis, presence oh hiatal hernia and reflux score improved after the procedure.

378 REDO LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATON IN A PATIENT WITH WRAP MIGRATION FOLLOWING TWICE FAILED NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION

Abstract Re-operation for wrap failure is a complex procedure required in 3–6% of patients. This video demonstrates a successful laparoscopic redo fundoplication in a patient who had previously undergone laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication twice for GERD in another institution, first for GERD in 2014 and then for recurrence of reflux. Patient presented to us with dysphagia and regurgitation. The work-up revealed wrap migration into the right pleural cavity. A successful redo laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication was performed. Methods The video describes the procedure of laparoscopic re do fundoplication. Results Patient is doing well at a follow up of 16 months. Conclusion Re-do laparoscopic fundoplication can be successfully accomplished through laparoscopic approach. Video https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Perelnr0fwGIk1kiAexYvXnJY01cO98C/view?usp=sharing.

RefluxStopTM, a novel device to address gastroesophageal reflux disease: Short-term results

Abstract Objective To report safety, feasibility, and patient’s functional short-term outcome of novel RefluxStop anti reflux operation. Methods All patients (n = 20) who received laparoscopic implantation of the RefluxStop device from September 2018 to November 2020 in a university hospital were included for retrospective analysis. Incidence of adverse device-effects and procedure-related adverse events are reported as safety endpoints. Feasibility was assessed reporting operation duration, rate of conversion to open surgery and technically correct position of the device by control radiography during patient’s follow up. Subjective (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) - questionnaires; after 6 weeks and every six-month thereof) and objective data (24h-pH-manometry, barium swallows and upper endoscopies) are reported as functional outcome parameters. Comparison between values at baseline versus post-procedure follow-up are performed using the paired samples T-test, if appropriate. Results Median follow up was 4 (1 – 22) month. Three out of 20 patients had previous upper gastrointestinal surgery (EndoStim implantation). No serious adverse device related events occurred. One patient with dysphagia required balloon dilatation at the oesophageal gastric junction 4 weeks postoperatively. Median duration of surgery was 85 (59-188) minutes. There was no conversion to open surgery. There was significant reduction in the mean of total GERD-HRQL score at baseline compared to 6-weeks after surgery with 23.9 and 4.3 (p &amp;lt; 0.001) as well as at baseline and 6 month after surgery with 28.4 and 6.8 (p = 0.021), respectively. At 6 weeks follow up, all of the subjects had over 50% improvement of the GERD-HRQL score compared to baseline. One patient with acceptable device positioning developed symptom recurrence and received conversion to laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication after 10 months. Conclusion RefluxStop procedure seems to be a safe operation with promising short-term results. For high-level recommendation, further studies looking for long-term results and randomized comparisons to the standard anti reflux procedures like Nissen or Toupet fundoplication are required.

REVIEW OF 5 YEARS RESULTS AFTER SURGERY FOR GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: NISSEN VS TOUPET

Abstract INTRODUCTION Multiple studies attempt to demonstrate the superiority of Toupet fundoplication over the classic Nissen technique in the treatment of gastro- oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In our study we compared the results of both techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective descriptive study of patients operated because of GERD using laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication in our centre between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. RESULTS 80 patients were operated, 56 Nissen (70%) versus 24 Toupet (30%). Both groups are comparable in terms of mean age, distribution by sex, obesity, toxic habits, the prevalence of typical symptoms, DeMeester, and presurgical lower oesophagal sphincter pressure; although there are differences regarding the presence of associated hiatal hernia and within them the type. A similar surgical time (136.59 vs 132.71 minutes) and mean stay (4.02 vs 5 days) were observed. In the Nissen group, 12 patients (21.42%) presented initial postoperative dysphagia, requiring 2 endoscopic dilations and 5 reoperations, compared to 5 patients (20.83%) in the Toupet group, that did not require dilation and with 1 reoperation. The conversion and mortality rate was 0% in both groups, with a variable follow-up of 22.08 versus 14.45 months. CONCLUSIONS Both techniques present similar results, including the rate of postoperative dysphagia, which is one of the most feared complications. However, it would be necessary to increase the size and longer follow-up to establish long-term results.

Peculiarities of surgical treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Objective. To analyze the effectiveness of various methods of laparoscopic antireflux operations in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.&#x0D; Materials and methods. The results of treatment of 177 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 1st - 62 patients who underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery of our own modification (Patent of Ukraine No 59772); 2nd - 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication; 3rd - 24 patients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. &#x0D; Results. 36 months after surgery in the 1st group the recurrence rate of gastroesophageal disease was 1.6%, recurrence of hernia of the esophageal orifice - 1.6%, in the 2nd group - 7.7 and 3.3%, respectively; in the 3rd group - 12.5 and 8.3%, respectively.&#x0D; Conclusions. The application of a new integrated approach to the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease reduces the number of postoperative complications (gas -bloat syndrome - 3 times, dysphagia - 5 times), the recurrence rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease - 5 times and recurrence of esophageal hernia - 2 times, improves the quality of life of patients 36 months after surgery in 2.6 times and increases the timeliness of diagnosis and facilitates the choice of differentiated treatment tactics.

Results after minimally invasive Toupet fundoplication technique: a narrative review

: Posterior partial fundoplication (PPF) was developed as an alternative surgical strategy to Nissen fundoplication, in attempt to reduce the rate of side-effects, mainly dysphagia and gas bloat syndrome. Allowing patients to maintain belching ability, this operation could lead to minor gas-related symptoms than total fundoplication. The procedure was first described by Andrè Toupet in 1963 and consisted of a posterior 180° wrap of the gastric fundus through a midline incision. After the first report of anti-reflux surgery performed with the laparoscopic approach, several authors have translated PPF into a minimally invasive approach. A review of literature has been performed to evaluate the results of minimally invasive PPF, focusing on the rate of dysphagia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) recurrence. The evidence suggests that laparoscopic PPF is a safe and feasible procedure, and provides similar reflux control compared to laparoscopic total fundoplication, with lower risk of postoperative dysphagia. However, the duration of laparoscopic PPF effect on reflux control over time is questioned, as data on long-term results after laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication are lacking. Further studies are needed to provide long-term functional and clinical results of laparoscopic PPF in order to draw definitive conclusions. Therefore, the controversy regarding the optimal surgical strategy for the management of gastroesophageal reflux continues.